Use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in hepatitis B virus carriers with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis: a case series in Taiwan

The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy in patients with psoriasis who are hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers is usually not recommended, and routine antiviral prophylaxis is suggested for those who need the treatment. We report our experience on the safety of anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with psoriasis who are HBV carriers in our clinic using HBV viral load as a guide for HBV treatment. Between 2007 and 2011, seven HBV carriers receiving TNF-α inhibitors for psoriasis in our clinic were collected retrospectively. The HBV viral load and aminotransferase levels were regularly monitored. Two of the seven patients were inactive HBV carriers, and the other five patients had chronic hepatitis B. Only one patient received antiviral agents before the anti-TNF-α treatment. The mean duration of the anti-TNF-α treatment was 26.6 months (range, 14-45 months). These patients were followed up from the start of the anti-TNF-α therapy for a mean duration of 28.9 months (range, 14-45 months). HBV reactivation was observed in three patients, one of whom required antiviral treatment. No HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was observed. In conclusion, prevention of HBV reactivation by monitoring of HBV viral load is cost-effective and may decrease the risk of developing drug resistance from routine anti-HBV prophylaxis treatment. It can be considered as an alternative in psoriasis patients treated by TNF-α inhibitors, especially in areas with a high HBV burden and in hepatitis B e-antigen-negative patients who have a lower risk of viral reactivation.

Management of recurrent cutaneous abscesses during therapy with infliximab

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody, belonging to the class of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents, approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Drugs of this class are known to be associated with an infective risk, probably because they interfere with inflammatory and immune response at different levels. Although cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infections seem to be more frequent than any other infection in the course of anti-TNF-α treatment, only a few case reports in the literature deal with this side effect, and, in particular, with its management.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to report a case of recurrent methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) cutaneous abscesses during therapy with infliximab and successful management.

CASE SUMMARY

In July 2009, a 53-year-old white woman (weighing 85 kg) affected by psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis was administered infliximab (5 mg/kg IV), based upon clinical appearance and previous unsuccessful treatment with cyclosporine, methotrexate, etanercept, and adalimumab. Three days after the first 3 infusions (at weeks 0, 2, and 6) she complained about the recurrent onset of painful, erythematous, indurated, and pus-draining cutaneous nodules located on her abdomen. The swab always revealed the presence of MSSA, and antibiotic oral therapy with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (875 + 125 mg BID for 7 days) was established, with complete resolution of the abscesses. Routine laboratory findings were in normal ranges, with the exception of an elevated erythrosedimentation rate and an increased white blood cell count (range, 13,000-15,000/mm(3)) with neutrophilia (range, 75%-80%). HIV infection was ruled out. In agreement with the infectious disease consultant, 1 day before the fourth infusion, a prophylactic antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (875 + 125 mg BID for 5 days) was added to the therapeutic regimen. This treatment schedule was successfully repeated at each following infusion (every 8 weeks), and no recurrence of skin abscesses was observed. The patient provided signed authorization for publication of this case.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report describes a woman with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis who developed MSSA skin abscesses after each of the first 3 infliximab infusions, which did not recur for the next 6 infusions after amoxicillin + clavulanic acid was added to her regimen, pre- and 4 days postinfusion. Adequately designed, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed to determine whether such prophylactic antibiotic treatment is well tolerated or effective for this common complication of therapy with anti-TNF-α agents, when withdrawal of the drug is not advisable, as in this case.

Clinical applicability of Quantiferon-TB-Gold testing in psoriasis patients during long-term anti-TNF-alpha treatment: a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis patients who are treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists are at increased risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and should be adequately screened and monitored during active treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate in a prospective study, the performance of Quantiferon-TB-Gold in tube (QFT) in vitro assay compared to the conventional tuberculin skin test (TST) in detecting LTBI among a cohort of non-BCG-vaccinated patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis during long-term treatment (12 months) with TNF-alpha antagonists.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients underwent QFT and TST testing at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of continuous anti-TNF-alpha treatment. Diagnosis of LTBI was made on the basis of a positive QFT result and negative chest-radiographic and microbiological assays. Patients with LTBI were subjected to standard isoniazid chemoprophylaxis and after 1 month, they resumed anti-TNF-alpha treatment with subsequent QFT and TST testing after 6 months. In all the cases, a follow-up period of 12 months was observed.

RESULTS

During the 12-month-study period, 14% of patients presented a QFT conversion. During active anti-TNF-alpha treatment, a QFT conversion was observed in 10% of patients (five cases). Agreement between QFT and TST was moderate (κ=0.408) at screening, good (κ=0.734) after 6 months and fair (κ=0.328) after 12 months of treatment. A total of 18% of patients presented a positive, discordant TST during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

A single-test QFT-based screening strategy for LTBI in psoriasis patients receiving long-term anti-TNF-alpha treatment could reduce the incidence of false-positive LTBI cases, preventing unnecessary TB chemoprophylaxis.

Dermatologist preferences for first-line therapy of moderate to severe psoriasis in healthy adult patients

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, dermatologists' treatment preferences are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess dermatologists' preferences for first-line treatments and their selection determinants.

METHODS

We surveyed 1000 US dermatologists (500 National Psoriasis Foundation and 500 American Academy of Dermatology members who treat psoriasis) about their preferences for first-line treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in healthy adults of childbearing age using standardized patient vignettes.

RESULTS

The response rate was 39% (N = 387). Preferred therapies for male and female patients were: ultraviolet (UV) B (40% and 56%, respectively), etanercept (15% and 19%), methotrexate (16% and 4%), and adalimumab (12% and 10%). Of respondents, 66% administered phototherapy in their practice. After adjusting for all physician characteristics, those preferring first-line UVB for male or female patients were significantly more likely to have phototherapy in their practice (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.6 and OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, respectively) and to have used UVB in more than 10 patients in the last 3 months (OR 8.0, 95% CI 3.9-16.4; OR 9.6, 95% CI 4.3-21.6). Dermatologists in the Midwest were more likely than those in the Northeast to prefer adalimumab first line for male and female patients.

LIMITATIONS

We surveyed only dermatologists with interest in treating psoriasis and elicited their treatment preferences for a single base case scenario. Treatment preferences may differ between survey respondents and nonrespondents.

CONCLUSION

UVB is most commonly preferred as a first-line treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis in healthy adults, and preferences vary based on region, phototherapy availability, and prior treatment use.

Advances in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

PURPOSE

Advances in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including new biological agents and related drugs, are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Most patients with psoriasis have mild disease that can be treated with topical agents alone; however, over one third of patients have more-extensive disease, called moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although effective, traditional therapies, including methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin, and phototherapy, have serious adverse effects that limit both the initiation and duration of treatment, necessitating sequential treatment regimens. With the increasing knowledge of the immune nature of the disease, biological agents that target T lymphocytes, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-12, and IL-23 have been used successfully in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab are also highly effective in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Ustekinumab, a new agent that targets IL-12 and IL-23, was approved for marketing in 2009 and offers similar efficacy and safety profiles to the anti-TNF agents. While the rapid onset and apparent lack of long-term toxicity of biological agents make them major advances in the treatment of more severe forms of psoriasis, the lack of extensive experience with these agents in patients with psoriasis leaves several unresolved issues that must be addressed before their exact place in therapy can be determined.

CONCLUSION

With the development of biological therapies over the past 10 years, health care providers have a much broader choice of highly effective agents with which to treat patients suffering from moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Though costly to use, biological agents offer considerable advantages over previously available systemic therapies.

Current psoriasis treatments in an Italian population and their association with socio-demographical and clinical features

BACKGROUND

Patient adherence is a key element for therapeutic success and represents a major concern for all healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of our study was to assess the frequency of use of treatments currently available for psoriasis and its association with specific socio-demographical and clinical variables.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 1689 patients, aged 12-85 years. Information concerning socio-demographical variables, clinical features and the type of current treatment was collected. Items on patients' satisfaction of current treatments and of dermatologist-patient relationship were also included. The chi-squared test was used to estimate the association between the categorical variables, whereas Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to the interval and ordinal variables. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared trend test was used to evaluate the degree of satisfaction related to dermatologist-patient relationship.

RESULTS

Of the 1689 psoriatic patients, 54.1% did not use any treatments and 45.9% used at least one treatment. The use of drugs was significantly associated exclusively to severity of disease and affected body surface area. Systemic therapies, both traditional treatments and biological agents, were mainly used in patients with disease duration >10 years and disease severity. Treatment adherence was significantly associated to the degree of patient's satisfaction of his/her relationship with the dermatologist. Alternative treatment such as over the counter medications and acupuncture were used by 33% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The majority of psoriatic patients do not use any treatments. However, treatment adherence significantly increases when dermatologists clarify the treatment schedule, inform patients and meet the patients' needs.

Safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α agents in psoriasis patients who were chronic hepatitis B carriers: a retrospective report of seven patients and brief review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Issues concerning the potential risks of reactivating chronic hepatitis B virus arise when the use of anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNFα) agents is imperative in patients with concurrent psoriasis and hepatitis B virus infection.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report the experience regarding safety in the management of patients with coexisting psoriasis and chronic hepatitis B with the anti-TNFα agents: infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab.

METHODS

The psoriasis outpatient database of our dermatological department was searched for psoriasis and hepatitis B diagnoses and the medical records of these patients were reviewed for use of anti-TNFα agents.

RESULTS

Seven cases (four women and three men) were identified, with mean age of 51years (34-65years). Three patients received adalimumab, three patients were given etanercept and one infliximab. All patients received lamivudin, 100mg/day, which started 2weeks before the initiation of anti-TNFα medication and went on during the whole treatment period. Follow-up period extended from 6-24months. All patients were inactive HbsAg (+) carriers. Liver function tests - at baseline and at the end of follow-up period - were within the normal range. There was no considerable rise in the viral load in any case, from baseline until the last available measurement, although a patient receiving infliximab showed an increase that reached 600 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

Successful treatment of psoriasis with anti-TNFα agents in patients who are inactive HBsAg carriers is possible and could be safe under the conditions of concomitant lamivudin administration and intensive monitoring. Larger randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Strategies for improving the quality of care in psoriasis with the use of treatment goals--a report on an implementation meeting

Targeted treatment, early intervention and the use of treatment goals is a new approach in medicine that has been implemented across several disciplines (e.g. diabetes, pulmonary arterial hypertension and rheumatoid arthritis) over the last 5-10 years. As in other chronic diseases, well-defined treatment goals may be helpful in guiding physicians in their care of patients with psoriasis, thereby obviating poor outcomes. Individual treatment goals were recently developed for the first time in psoriasis by a European Consensus group of experts from 19 European countries to supplement guidelines and promote the consistent use of available therapies to improve patient care. Goal-oriented therapy involves treating according to a treatment algorithm, regularly monitoring therapeutic response and prompt modification of therapy if goals are not met. In the absence of hard outcomes in psoriasis (e.g. biomarkers or biomedical predictors of clinical response), the European Consensus group based their treatment goals on changes in Psoriasis Area Severity Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Further evidence generation is important to determine whether surrogate markers for disease progression (e.g. co-morbidities) or predictors of clinical response can be identified for psoriasis. Furthermore, psoriasis may have a potential cumulative effect on the life course of patients, the understanding of which is likely to provide the rationale for earlier treatment strategies in psoriasis. For the work of the European Consensus group to have an impact on clinical care, transmission of treatment goals into guidelines, along with implementation of treatment goals at both the regional and national level is needed. Thus, dermatology experts from Europe, the Middle East, Australia and Canada gathered in Frankfurt, 2010, for a 1.5 day educational meeting run by the Progressive Psoriasis Initiative to discuss how treatment goals in psoriasis might best be implemented in clinical practice. The meeting conclusions are presented here.

Switching to adalimumab for psoriasis patients with a suboptimal response to etanercept, methotrexate, or phototherapy: efficacy and safety results from an open-label study

BACKGROUND

Strategies for transitioning patients with psoriasis from suboptimal therapy have not been delineated.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of transitioning to adalimumab for the treatment of psoriasis in patients with suboptimal response to prior therapy with etanercept, methotrexate (MTX), or narrowband (NB)-ultraviolet (UV)B phototherapy.

METHODS

In this 16-week, open-label, phase IIIb trial, patients with chronic plaque psoriasis discontinued suboptimal therapy between 11 and 17 days (etanercept) or between 4 and 10 days (MTX and NB-UVB) before initiating adalimumab (80 mg at week 0, then 40 mg every other week from week 1). The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving a Physician Global Assessment of "clear" or "minimal" at week 16.

RESULTS

At week 16, Physician Global Assessment of "clear" or "minimal" was achieved by 52% of all enrolled patients (79 of 152) and 49%, 61%, and 48% in the etanercept, MTX, and NB-UVB subgroups, respectively. Four patients (2.6%) experienced at least 125% worsening of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score relative to screening value at any study visit. The adalimumab safety profile was consistent with results from other psoriasis clinical trials.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its relatively short 16-week duration, small patient enrollment, and open-label design.

CONCLUSION

Patients who had a suboptimal response to etanercept, MTX, or NB-UVB phototherapy experienced a similar, approximately 50% likelihood of achieving a clinically relevant response to adalimumab. Immediate transition to adalimumab from prior suboptimal therapy, with no dosage tapering or overlap, had a low risk of psoriasis flare.

Exaggerated Imiquimod Application Site Reactions in the Context of Systemic Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibition: More Than a Coincidental Occurrence?

Topical imiquimod and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors have gained wide acceptance as safe and effective treatments for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and moderate to severe psoriasis, respectively. While mild to moderate application site reactions (ASRs) are a well-known and common phenomenon associated with imiquimod, the potential of TNF-α blockers to elicit cutaneous inflammatory reactions has only recently been recognized. We present two cases of severe, atypical ASRs which occurred during NMSC treatment with imiquimod in the context of infliximab administration for psoriasis, and consider the grounds supporting a non-fortuitous association. To date, no relation has ever been suggested between TNF-α inhibitors and increased susceptibility to developing exaggerated ASRs with imiquimod. We believe that this subject deserves further analysis; meanwhile, increased attention should be drawn to the possibility of this adverse interaction, as simultaneous treatment with TNF-α blockers and imiquimod is becoming increasingly frequent in daily practice.

Fumarates vs. methotrexate in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a multicentre prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate and fumarates are effective systemic therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis according to the European S3 guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and the adverse events of methotrexate and fumarates.

METHODS

Sixty patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris were randomly assigned to treatment for 16 weeks with either methotrexate (30 patients; 15 mg per week) or fumarates (30 patients; 30 mg, followed by 120 mg according to a standard progressive dosage regimen) and were followed up for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint with respect to the efficacy was the difference in mean change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) after 12 weeks of treatment. The study was powered to detect a difference of five points. Analyses were by intention to treat.

RESULTS

Six patients were excluded because five were not eligible and one withdrew consent. Two patients in the methotrexate group and one in the fumarate group dropped out during the 12 weeks of treatment because of nonappearance at the outpatient clinic. In total, 25 patients in the methotrexate group and 26 in the fumarate group were evaluated in the primary analysis. After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean ± SD PASI decreased from 14·5 ± 3·0 at baseline to 6·7 ± 4·5 in the 25 patients treated with methotrexate, whereas it decreased from 18·1 ± 7·0 to 10·5 ± 6·7 in the 26 patients treated with fumarates. After adjustment for baseline values, the absolute difference (fumarates minus methotrexate) in the mean values at 12 weeks was 1·4 (95% confidence interval -2·0 to 4·7; P = 0·417).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized trial methotrexate and fumarates were found to be equally effective in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. No serious or irreversible adverse events were observed in any of the patients.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents: subanalysis of BELIEVE

BACKGROUND

Few large clinical studies have evaluated whether switching tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNFs) is likely to improve psoriasis in patients with prior anti-TNF treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this subanalysis of the BELIEVE study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for psoriasis in patients with and without previous anti-TNF treatment.

METHODS

The BELIEVE study enrolled patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and prior failure, intolerance or contraindication to ≥2 systemic therapies. In this 16-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, patients received adalimumab (80 mg, week 0; 40 mg every other week, weeks 1-15) with either topical vehicle or topical calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (C/B) applied once daily for 4 weeks, then as needed. The primary endpoint was ≥75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) at week 16. This post hoc subanalysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of adalimumab, with and without topical therapy, in BELIEVE patients who had prior exposure to anti-TNFs.

RESULTS

Of 730 patients enrolled, 282 (38.6%) had prior anti-TNFs and 448 (61.4%) were anti-TNF-naïve. Combining topical vehicle and topical C/B study populations, 61.7% of patients with prior anti-TNFs achieved PASI 75 at week 16, compared with 71.7% of anti-TNF-naïve patients (P=0.095). Adalimumab resulted in clinically meaningful improvement regardless of which prior anti-TNF agent had been used, the number of prior anti-TNFs tried, or reasons for discontinuation of prior anti-TNF therapy. Adverse event incidences were similar between patients with and without prior anti-TNF therapy.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab was effective and well-tolerated in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti-TNF therapy.

Assessment and management of methotrexate hepatotoxicity in psoriasis patients: report from a consensus conference to evaluate current practice and identify key questions toward optimizing methotrexate use in the clinic

Experts in psoriasis, hepatology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics convened to discuss the safety and monitoring of methotrexate with respect to hepatotoxicity when used in the treatment of psoriasis. Methotrexate is an efficacious and cost-effective treatment for psoriasis, but is associated with significant safety issues, particularly relating to hepatotoxicity. Current British, Dutch, German, EU and US guidelines for baseline evaluations, monitoring and prevention of hepatotoxicity in patients with psoriasis receiving methotrexate were evaluated. Liver safety monitoring is currently reliant upon multiple methods, including biopsy, serological tests for biomarkers such as type III procollagen amino terminal propeptide (PIIINP), and liver function tests based on liver enzymes. Monitoring of patients receiving long-term therapy is expected to be improved by the utilization of serum biomarkers currently in development such as the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) panel and other non-invasive tests of hepatic architecture, such as fibroelastography, microbubbles and magnetic resonance imaging. Appropriate studies to determine optimal dosing to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity, potentially utilizing pharmacogenetic principles, are clearly needed. Key questions for future research are identified including needs for optimal screening and monitoring, identification of appropriate biomarkers, assessment of relationships between dosing and safety, utility of liver biopsy, optimal dosing regimens (including route of administration), methods to measure methotrexate levels in blood, and use of methotrexate as a standardized active comparator in trials of experimental drugs used to treat psoriasis.

The use of cyclosporine in dermatology: part I

Cyclosporine is a calcineurin inhibitor that acts selectively on T cells. It has been used in dermatology since 1997 for its US Food and Drug Administration indication of psoriasis and off-label for various other inflammatory skin conditions, including atopic dermatitis, blistering disorders, and connective tissue diseases. In the last decade, many dermatologists have hesitated to use this important drug in their clinical practices because of its toxicity profile. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanism of action of cyclosporine and its current uses and dosing schedules. It is our goal to create a framework in which dermatologists feel comfortable and safe incorporating cyclosporine into their prescribing regimens.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this learning activity, participants should be able to describe the mechanism of action of cyclosporine, recognize the potential role of cyclosporine in dermatology and the evidence to support this role, and incorporate cyclosporine into his or her prescribing regimens.

[Treatment of psoriasis using biologics]

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, which is characterized by red, scaly, raised plaques. Its symptoms may range in severity and there are severe clinical subtypes of psoriasis including pustular psoriasis. Pre-biological systemic therapies were targeting mainly keratinocyte proliferation and T cell activation. However, there were cases, in which these classic therapies were not fully effective or could not be used because of the accompanied severe organ failure of the psoriasis patient. Recent progress in psoriasis research has clarified which of the cells, cell surface molecules and cytokines play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Biological systemic therapies targeting these molecules have turned out to be extremely effective in treating psoriasis and are now used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis worldwide. These biological therapies are not only more effective than pre-biological systemic therapies, but also show more rapid response, and long-term efficacy is expected. The TNF-alpha inhibitors are now approved as the first biological therapy for psoriasis in Japan. These TNF-alpha inhibitors are expected to be a new standard therapy for severe psoriasis, however, since the long-term safety is an unsolved issue, careful clinical monitoring is required. (193 words).

Topical delivery for the treatment of psoriasis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Psoriasis is one of the most common human skin diseases. Topical therapy forms the cornerstone in the management of mild-to-moderate psoriasis. Topical therapies are also used as adjunctive to systemic therapy in moderate and severe forms of the disease.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

In this review, an overview of psoriasis pathogenesis, new topical medications for psoriasis, new targets and molecules, combination topical therapies and combination of topical and phototherapy is provided. Over the past decade several efficacious and acceptable treatment options have emerged from the age-old therapies. The development of sophisticated formulation options has led to an enhancement in the rate and extent of drug delivery across the skin, increasing therapeutic value and improving patient compliance.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Readers will learn about monotherapy and combination topical products as well as new topical drug delivery technology to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. This review will highlight the need to generate more dermal pharmacokinetic data for better understanding of the impact of formulation change on skin pharmacokinetics to help design improved topical drug delivery systems.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

New topical formulations have the potential to achieve better efficacy with improved safety profile.

Current status and new developments in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis with biological agents

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting 1-3% of the general population. Among psoriatic patients, 5-40% are affected by psoriatic arthritis. Due to the chronic nature of the disease, patients suffer from substantial psychological and financial burdens, thus adding to a significantly impaired quality of life. Traditional systemic therapies for psoriasis, such as methotrexate, cyclosporin A, retinoids or PUVA therapy, have a potential for long-term toxicity and may not always provide sufficient improvement of the disease. The development of novel therapies targeting key steps in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis now provide new and efficient treatment options. Biological therapies for the treatment of psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis are defined by their mode of action and can be classified into three categories: the T-cell modulating agents (alefacept and efalizumab), the inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha blockers, e.g. adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab and infliximab) and the inhibitors of interleukin (IL) 12 and IL-23 (e.g. ustekinumab and briakinumab). This article provides a brief overview of the currently approved biological agents in the European Union and of some newer agents, such as briakinumab, certolizumab and golimumab.

Perioperative infliximab application ameliorates acute rejection associated inflammation after intestinal transplantation

As we have shown in the past, acute rejection-related TNF-α upregulation in resident macrophages in the tunica muscularis after small bowel transplantation (SBTx) results in local amplification of inflammation, decisively contributing to graft dysmotility. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the chimeric-monoclonal-anti-TNF-α antibody infliximab as perioperative single shot treatment addressing inflammatory processes during acute rejection early after transplantation. Orthotopic, isogenic and allogenic SBTx was performed in rats (BN-Lewis/BN-BN) with infliximab treatment. Vehicle and IV-immunoglobulin-treated animals served as controls. Animals were sacrificed after 24 and 168 h. Leukocyte infiltration was investigated in muscularis whole mounts by immunohistochemistry, mediator mRNA expression by Real-Time-RT-PCR, apoptosis by TUNEL and smooth muscle contractility in a standard organ bath. Both, infliximab and Sandoglobulin® revealed antiinflammatory effects. Infliximab resulted in significantly less leukocyte infiltration compared to allogenic controls and IV-immunoglobulin, which was accompanied by lower gene expression of MCP-1 (24 h), IFN-γ (168 h) and infiltration of CD8-positive cells. Smooth muscle contractility improved significantly after 24 h compared to all controls in infliximab treated animals accompanied by lower iNOS expression. Perioperative treatment with infliximab is a possible pharmaceutical approach to overcome graft dysmotility early after SBTx.

What's new in psoriasis? Analysis of the clinical significance of new guidelines and systematic reviews on psoriasis published in 2008 and 2009

This review summarizes the clinical importance of 18 systematic reviews and guidelines on psoriasis published or indexed between November 2008 and October 2009. The topics covered include guidance on the use of topical, systemic and biological therapies for the treatment of psoriasis; comorbidities associated with psoriasis; and complementary therapies for psoriasis. A similar and more detailed review to this appeared in the 2009 Annual Evidence Update on Psoriasis from NHS Evidence - Skin Disorders in November 2009.

Definition of treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: a European consensus

Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis are undertreated. To solve this persistent problem, the consensus programme was performed to define goals for treatment of plaque psoriasis with systemic therapy and to improve patient care. An expert consensus meeting and a collaborative Delphi procedure were carried out. Nineteen dermatologists from different European countries met for a face-to-face discussion and defined items through a four-round Delphi process. Severity of plaque psoriasis was graded into mild and moderate to severe disease. Mild disease was defined as body surface area (BSA) ≤10 and psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) ≤10 and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) ≤10 and moderate to severe psoriasis as (BSA > 10 or PASI > 10) and DLQI > 10. Special clinical situations may change mild psoriasis to moderate to severe including involvement of visible areas or severe nail involvement. For systemic therapy of plaque psoriasis two treatment phases were defined: (1) induction phase as the treatment period until week 16; however, depending on the type of drug and dose regimen used, this phase may be extended until week 24 and (2) maintenance phase for all drugs was defined as the treatment period after the induction phase. For the definition of treatment goals in plaque psoriasis, the change of PASI from baseline until the time of evaluation (ΔPASI) and the absolute DLQI were used. After induction and during maintenance therapy, treatment can be continued if reduction in PASI is ≥75%. The treatment regimen should be modified if improvement of PASI is <50%. In a situation where the therapeutic response improved ≥50% but <75%, as assessed by PASI, therapy should be modified if the DLQI is >5 but can be continued if the DLQI is ≤5. This programme defines the severity of plaque psoriasis for the first time using a formal consensus of 19 European experts. In addition, treatment goals for moderate to severe disease were established. Implementation of treatment goals in the daily management of psoriasis will improve patient care and mitigate the problem of undertreatment. It is planned to evaluate the implementation of these treatment goals in a subsequent programme involving patients and physicians.

Safety and efficacy of the tumor necrosis factor antagonists

Psoriasis is one of the most common systemic inflammatory diseases and affects the quality of life of the affected persons profoundly. Further knowledge of the pathogenesis and new biotechnological techniques have made it possible to develop new targeted therapies, such as antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Today, 3 TNF inhibitors, infliximab, adalimumab, and Etanercept, have been approved for the treatment of psoriasis arthritis, psoriasis, and other indications like Crohn's disease, depending on the distinct substance by the European Medicines Agency. Golimumab was approved in September 2009 for the use in psoriasis arthritis, respectively. These substances have added new effective treatment options to the therapeutic armamentarium of psoriasis. To use these new treatments for the best of our patients, it is important to know the correct application, the advantages, as well as contraindications or possible adverse effects of the substances. This article provides an update on the TNF-alpha inhibitors with emphasis on practical daily use. Most data are on the basis of high-quality studies and official guidelines, but if necessary, data from recent publications or clinical expertise have been added. In summary, with TNF inhibitors we have gained effective new treatment options showing a favorable safety profile when paying attention to safety aspects before and during therapy (screening, monitoring).

Cutaneous malignancies during treatment with efalizumab and infliximab: When temporal relationship does not mean causality

Some of the traditional psoriasis therapies, such as PUVA therapy and ciclosporin, have been linked to an increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer. More recently, an increased risk of cancer has also been a concern with newly introduced biologic agents. The authors report a case of multiple cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas arising on the lower limbs of a patient receiving efalizumab first and subsequently infliximab following many years of treatment with conventional therapies including PUVA and ciclosporin. Both these previous therapies likely contributed to the development of the skin tumors of this patient. Several case reports have documented that the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors may be associated with non-melanoma skin cancer, in particular squamous cell carcinoma. However, case reports, although numerous and well documented, do not fulfil the requirements for testing a cause-effect hypothesis. Since data from animal models indicate that TNF inhibition does not increase the incidence of malignancies, additional longer-term studies are necessary to ascertain whether a link exists between anti-TNF-α and non-melanoma skin cancer above that normally observed in psoriasis patients.

Critical appraisal of quality of clinical practice guidelines for treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, 2006-2009

Numerous international clinical guidelines for management of psoriasis have recently been published. We evaluated the quality of guidelines published between 2006 and December 2009 using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Eight guidelines from five separate working groups fulfilled inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Four used the standards established by the AGREE instrument in the process of development of their guidelines. Each of the guidelines uniformly received high domain scores (i.e., > 90%) for scope and purpose (range of 94-100%), and clarity and presentation (range of 92-100%). Nevertheless, each of the eight guidelines had important shortcomings (item scores < or = 2/4, in which 4 indicates strongly agree and 1 indicates strongly disagree that specific items have been adequately addressed) in at least one item including: stakeholder involvement (by lack of piloting and inadequate determination of patient views), development rigor (inadequate procedure for updating), applicability (by lack of discussion on organizational barriers), and editorial independence (from funding body). Despite the use of predefined standards in their development, important deficiencies exist in the most recent clinical treatment guidelines for psoriasis.

Narrow-band UVB phototherapy of nasal polyps: results of a pilot study

Nasal polyposis (NP) is characterized by high recurrence rate despite medical and/or surgical treatment. The major mechanism of action of ultraviolet B light (UVB) is induction of apoptosis in inflammatory cells. Therefore phototherapy may represent a new therapeutic approach in NP. A pilot feasibility study was performed to assess the tolerability and clinical efficacy of UVB phototherapy in NP. Thirteen subjects with bilateral grade 1-3 NP were enrolled in an open-labeled prospective pilot study. Patients were exposed to gradually increasing doses of UVB light over a 12 week period (3 exposures/week). Subjects rated their nasal obstruction symptom scores weekly on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 6. The NOSE quality of life questionnaire was used at baseline and end of treatment period. Adverse events were monitored by endoscopy. Ten subjects completed the study. Nasal obstruction symptom scores and quality of life (NOSE) improved at end of treatment compared to baseline. Treatments were well tolerated and no device related adverse events were reported. The results suggest that phototherapy may represent a potential new treatment option in nasal polyps.

Potential role of ustekinumab in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis

Psoriasis is a relatively common, chronic and disabling skin disease, with an immune-related pathogenesis and a genetic background which may be triggered by several environmental factors including smoking and infections. There is no cure but several treatment options are available. The treatment of psoriasis is far from being satisfactory due to impractical modalities of topical treatment and suboptimal safety profile of the systemic treatments available. In the last few years, parallel to an improved understanding of the disease pathogenesis, there has been a boost in research on new agents for the treatment of psoriasis. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, is one such new agent. Psoriasis and its management are briefly reviewed before focusing on the evidence for ustekinumab in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis through a systematic search of the main registries of ongoing trials up to December 2009. Ustekinumab proved to be very effective short term in the control of clinical manifestations in psoriasis compared with placebo and with etanercept. Long-term and comparative data are still limited. There is a need for continuing research on the long-term effectiveness and safety of the drug.