Evaluation of the lower limb vasculature before free fibula flap transfer. A prospective blinded comparison between magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the preoperative assessment of crural arteries and their skin perforators prior to free fibular transfer. Patients and methods Fifteen consecutive patients, scheduled for free vascularized fibular flap transfer, were subjected to DSA as well as MRA of the crural arteries of both legs (n = 30). All DSA and MRA images were assessed randomly, blindly, and independently by two radiologists. Each of the assessors scored the degree of stenosis of various segments on a 5 point scale from 0 (occlusive) to 4 (no stenosis). The Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to assess the agreement between DSA and MRA scores. In addition, the number of cutaneous perforators were scored and the assessors were asked if they would advise against fibula harvest and transplantation based on the images. Results A Cohen's Kappa of 0.64, indicating "substantial agreement of stenosis severity scores" was found between the two imaging techniques. The sensitivity of MRA to detect a stenosis compared with DSA was 79% (CI 95%:60-91), and a specificity of 98% (CI 95%: 97-99). In 53 out of 60 assessments, advice on suitability for transfer were equal between DSA and MRA. The median number of cutaneous perforators that perfuse the skin overlying the fibula per leg was one for DSA as well as MRA (P = 0.142).Conclusions A substantial agreement in the assessment of stenosis severity was found between DSA and MRA. The results suggest that MRA is a good alternative to DSA in the preoperative planning of free fibula flap transplantation.

Preoperative MR angiography for free fibula osteocutaneous flap transfer

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is currently considered the most useful test to evaluate the vascular anatomy of the lower leg prior to free fibula osteocutaneous flap transfer. This study aimed to confirm the validity of preoperative MRA.

METHODS

In 19 patients underwent free fibula osteocutaneous flap transfer for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction, the MRA and intraoperative findings and the postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed. The location and number of distal septocutaneous perforators (dSCPs) that were preoperatively identified and harvested with flaps were documented.

RESULTS

Preoperative MRA detected dSCPs with 100% sensitivity. MRA findings also revealed the diversity of vascular structures, such as the tibio-peroneal bifurcation location and the anatomical relationship between the peroneal vessels and the fibula. No patients suffered postoperative ischemic complications in the donor leg. The total flap survival rate was 95 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative MRA effectively excluded large vessel anomalies and peripheral vascular disease, and precisely identified the septocutaneous perforators. Additionally, preoperative MRA contributed to a safer fibular osteotomy by predicting the anatomical relationship between the peroneal vessels and the fibula.

Free-Flap Reconstruction of Large Full-Thickness Lip and Chin Defects

Objectives:

We describe our experience in the reconstruction of large 3-layer lip defects using free revascularized lower-arm and fibula flaps.

Methods:

Between 2005 and 2009, nine patients underwent free-flap reconstruction after oncological surgery involving the lip and chin with or without mandibular involvement. The flap techniques are described, and postoperative functional and aesthetic results were recorded.

Results:

There were no flap failures. All patients showed intact oral function and good aesthetic results. Two patients died of distant metastases, 8 months and 17 months after surgery.

Conclusions:

Three-layer defects of the lip ideally require free-flap reconstruction, which has a high probability of achieving good functional and aesthetic results.

Microvascular reconstruction of the mouth, face and jaws. Oromandibular reconstruction - free fibula flap

Dental surgeons may encounter in their clinical practice patients who present with aggressive pathologies that require early diagnosis and prompt treatment. This action may limit the extent of tissue damage and, where relevant, improve survival outcome. Clinicians should therefore be aware of the range of resective, reconstructive and rehabilitative options that are available in the management of these patients. We present our experience with the free fibula flap used for oromandibular reconstruction; this was undertaken in 21 patients following resective surgery for malignant pathology, cytologically benign but biologically aggressive odontogenic pathology and radiation induced osteonecrosis. We also review the history, surgical anatomy, surgical assessment and potential complications that are relevant to the free fibula flap.