[Diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: the value of optical coherence tomography]

Besides the relapse rate and neurological examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in multiple sclerosis (MS) monitoring. However, MRI is costly and even in Germany not always readily available. Additionally, routine MRI scans are not sensitive enough regarding differentiation between demyelination and neurodegeneration and show a discrepancy between lesion load and the degree of disability. In contrast, optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a validated non-invasive method for the quantification of neurodegenerative processes in the retina, as they appear in MS and other neurological diseases. The OCT is inexpensive, easy to handle and highly reproducible. Additionally, it is well tolerated and thus represents a promising tool for monitoring of neurodegenerative disorders. This article describes in detail the OCT technique and its usefulness for both diagnosis and monitoring of MS.

Optical Coherence Tomography Reveals Distinct Patterns of Retinal Damage in Neuromyelitis Optica and Multiple Sclerosis

Background

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are difficult to differentiate solely on clinical grounds. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies investigating retinal changes in both diseases focused primarily on the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) while rare data are available on deeper intra-retinal layers.

Objective

To detect different patterns of intra-retinal layer alterations in patients with NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and RRMS with focus on the influence of a previous optic neuritis (ON).

Methods

We applied spectral-domain OCT in eyes of NMOSD patients and compared them to matched RRMS patients and healthy controls (HC). Semi-automatic intra-retinal layer segmentation was used to quantify intra-retinal layer thicknesses. In a subgroup low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) was assessed.

Results

NMOSD-, MS- and HC-groups, each comprising 17 subjects, were included in analysis. RNFL thickness was more severely reduced in NMOSD compared to MS following ON. In MS-ON eyes, RNFL thinning showed a clear temporal preponderance, whereas in NMOSD-ON eyes RNFL was more evenly reduced, resulting in a significantly lower ratio of the nasal versus temporal RNFL thickness. In comparison to HC, ganglion cell layer thickness was stronger reduced in NMOSD-ON than in MS-ON, accompanied by a more severe impairment of LCVA. The inner nuclear layer and the outer retinal layers were thicker in NMOSD-ON patients compared to NMOSD without ON and HC eyes while these differences were primarily driven by microcystic macular edema.

Conclusion

Our study supports previous findings that ON in NMOSD leads to more pronounced retinal thinning and visual function impairment than in RRMS. The different retinal damage patterns in NMOSD versus RRMS support the current notion of distinct pathomechanisms of both conditions. However, OCT is still insufficient to help with the clinically relevant differentiation of both conditions in an individual patient.