Photorefractive keratectomy to create toric ablations for correction of astigmatism

Three-year outcomes of mixed astigmatism correction with single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with a large ablation zone

PURPOSE

To evaluate refractive and visual outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK) in the treatment of mixed astigmatism with the use of an aberration-neutral profile and large ablation zone.

SETTING

Nicolaus Copernicus University and Oftalmika Eye Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational case series.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent transPRK to correct mixed astigmatism and completed the 3-year follow-up. Procedures were performed with an Amaris 750S excimer laser using an aberration-neutral profile and optical zone of 7.2 mm or more.

RESULTS

A total 48 eyes of 39 patients were included. Preoperatively, mean spherical manifest refraction was +1.37 ± 0.98 diopter (D) (0.25 to 4.00 D), and astigmatism was -4.00 ± 0.76 D (-2.25 to -6.00 D). Three years postsurgery, it was -0.17 ± 0.26 D and -0.41 ± 0.44 D, respectively. Attempted spherical equivalent correction within ±0.50 D was achieved in 45 eyes (94%) and cylindrical correction in 34 (71%). Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/20 or better in 38 eyes (79%), and postoperative uncorrected was 20/20 or better in 29 eyes (60.0%). No eye had lost 2 or more Snellen lines of CDVA, whereas 3 eyes (6%) gained 2 or more lines. In 4 eyes (8%), haze of low intensity was observed at the periphery, with scores between 0.5 and 1.0, and only 1 eye getting a score of 2 in 0- to 4-degree scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed astigmatism correction with large-ablation-zone transPRK provided good results for efficacy, safety, predictability, and visual outcomes in a 3-year follow-up.

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy in Moderate to High Astigmatism With a Non-wavefront-Guided Aberration-Neutral Ablation Profile

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in moderate to high astigmatism with a non-wavefront-guided aberration-neutral ablation profile using SmartPulse allocation.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, myopic patients with a preoperative cylinder of 2.00 diopters (D) or greater were analyzed at 3 months of follow-up. Transepithelial PRK treatments were performed in each patient with the Amaris 1050RS laser (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) creating aspheric ablation profiles by applying a SmartPulse allocation. Standard examinations and wavefront analyses were included for low and high ocular residual astigmatism subgroups.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight eyes (44 patients) were included in the cohort. The eyes were divided into separate ocular residual astigmatism subgroups: 17 eyes presented with less than 0.50 D (low ocular residual astigmatism) and 24 eyes with greater than 0.75 D (high ocular residual astigmatism). The mean refractive cylinder in the entire cohort was 2.84 ± 0.86 D preoperatively and 0.40 ± 0.39 D postoperatively, with 81% of the eyes within 0.75 D of the target astigmatism. At 3 months of follow-up, significant improvement (P < .05) was seen in terms of sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent, and uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity. CDVA improved in 40% of eyes and 3% of eyes lost one line of CDVA. No clinically relevant changes were seen in higher order aberrations. The refractive changes showed an excellent match with the keratometric changes. The difference between the low and high ocular residual astigmatism subgroups was not significant except for the change of Snellen lines of CDVA (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Transepithelial PRK using a non-wavefront-guided aberration-neutral ablation profile performed by applying SmartPulse allocation yielded excellent visual outcomes. The preoperative astigmatism was reduced to subclinical values. Both subgroups were effective in terms of UDVA, CDVA, spherical and astigmatic correction, and preserving higher order aberrations. However, the low ocular residual astigmatism subgroup was slightly more prone to gain lines of CDVA. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(7):466-474.].

Compound Myopic Astigmatism Correction using a Mask In-the-Rail Excimer Laser Delivery System. Preliminary Results

PURPOSE

The latest development in the erodible mask technology is an excimer laser containing the mask in the laser optical pathway. This paper reports the results of the first human series of consecutive treatments performed for the correction of compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

We have treated 83 eyes. Spherical equivalent attempted correction ranged between -1.75 and -11.75 D (mean -7.07+/- 2.45 D), astigmatic attempted correction ranged between -1.00 and -5.00 D (mean -2.42+/- 1.02 D). The sphere correction was made by diaphragm using a multi-zone software with three ablation zones: 100% of the total attempted correction for the central 5.0 mm zone, 70% for the second 6.0 mm zone, 30% for the outer 6.5 mm zone. Cylinder correction was made sequentially after myopic correction using the appropriate mask.

RESULTS

One month after treatment, mean refractive error was + 1.07 +/- 1.24 D (range + 4.50/-1.75 D) for spherical equivalent, and -0.49 +/- 0.57 D (range + 0.75/-2.00 D) for astigmatism. Forty-eight eyes (57.8%) had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. At six months, mean refractive error was +0.42 +/- 0.97 D (range + 3.75/-1.00 D) for spherical equivalent, and -0.44 +/- 0.51 D (range +0.25/-3.00 D) for astigmatism. Vector analysis showed that 57 eyes (68.7%) had 5 or less degrees rotation. Seventy-two (86.7%) and 54 eyes (65.1%) had uncorrected visual acuity equal or better than 20/40 and 20/25 respectively. One eye (1.2%) showed a best corrected visual acuity loss of more than one line, but 8 eyes (9.6%) had a gain of more than one line. One-year results on a smaller series (33 eyes) overlap with the six-month results.

CONCLUSIONS

The mask in-the-rail excimer laser delivery system appears to be effective and predictable in the correction of compound myopic astigmatism. We observed no significant regression of the astigmatic correction over time. Longer follow-up on larger series is necessary to draw final conclusions.

Long-term results of excimer laser procedure to correct astigmatic refractive errors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, stability, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) as treatment of astigmatism.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Ninety-four eyes of 52 patients, treated with PRK for compound myopic astigmatism, compound hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism were studied during a 36-month period. Main outcome measures were uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity (UCVA, BCVA), refraction, and corneal transparency. Astigmatism correction was analyzed by a power vector method.

RESULTS

In myopic astigmatism group (42 eyes), postoperative UCVA was 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes, 20/25 or better in 38 eyes out of 42 (90.5%), and 20/20 or better in 25/42 eyes (59.5%). No eye lost lines of the BCVA, 40/42 (95.2%) eyes had refraction within ± 1D and 37/42 (88.1%) within ± 0.50 D. In the hyperopic astigmatism group (28 eyes), the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes, 20/25 or better in 26/28 eyes (92.8%), and 20/20 or better in 24/28 eyes (85.7%); 1/28 eyes (3.6%) lost 1 line of the BCVA, 23/28 eyes (82.1%) were within ± 1D, and 21/28 (75%) were within ± 0.50D. In the mixed astigmatism group (24 eyes), the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes, 20/25 or better in 22/24 eyes (91.7%) and 20/20 in 15/24 (62.5%) eyes. No eye lost lines of BCVA, 23/24 eyes (95.8%) were within 1.0 D, and 20/24 eyes (83.3%) were within 0.50 D of defocus refraction. Power vector analysis showed a significant reduction of blurring strength in all examined groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PRK is a safe and effective procedure for correction of all types of astigmatism, with good stability and efficacy at 3-year follow-up.

Excimer laser correction of moderate to high astigmatism with a non-wavefront-guided aberration-free ablation profile: Six-month results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the postoperative clinical outcomes and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in eyes with astigmatism greater than 2.00 diopters (D) that had laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a non-wavefront-guided aberration-free ablation profile.

SETTINGS

Private practice.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the 6-month results of LASIK for astigmatism greater than 2.00 D. Standard examinations and preoperative and postoperative wavefront analyses were performed. Aspheric treatments with a non-wavefront-guided ablation profile were planned using software integrated into the Amaris flying-spot excimer laser system, which was used to perform the ablations. The LASIK flaps were created using an LDV femtosecond laser. Clinical outcomes were predictability, refractive outcomes, safety, efficacy, and wavefront aberration.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 84% of the 50 eyes evaluated achieved 20/20 or better uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and 40% achieved 20/16 or better UDVA. Forty-four percent of eyes were within +/-0.25 D of the attempted astigmatic correction, and 78% were within +/-0.50 D. The mean SE was -0.12 D +/- 0.25 (SD) and the mean astigmatism, 0.50 +/- 0.26 D. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved in 36% of eyes; 4% of eyes lost 1 line of CDVA. The predictability slope for astigmatism was 0.97 and the intercept, -0.15 D. There were no clinically relevant changes in any aberration metric from preoperatively to postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Excimer laser LASIK using a non-wavefront-guided aberration-free ablation profile yielded excellent visual outcomes. The preoperative astigmatism was reduced to subclinical values with no clinically relevant induction of HOA.

[LASIK treatment for graft astigmatism]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the advantages of LASIK as a treatment for postkeratoplasty residual astigmatism.

PATIENTS

and

METHOD

Retrospective, noncomparative, monocentric study on 14 patients with penetrative keratoplasty. Visual acuity, objective refraction, intraocular pressure, slit lamp biomicroscopy, videotopography, pachymetry, and patient satisfaction were studied before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Refraction was stable 6 months after treatment in 93% (13/14) of the patients. The mean uncorrected visual acuity increased from 0.16 to 0.4. Two out of four patients (14.3%) were retreated because visual acuity did not improve after the first treatment; 35% did not need any optical correction after the intervention. The measured astigmatism showed a significant decrease, from 65% greater than 5 D before treatment to 82% under 2 D after treatment. Only two out of 14 patients (14.3%) were not satisfied. No intraocular or postoperative complications were reported in this study.

CONCLUSION

LASIK seems to be an interesting option in the treatment of postkeratoplasty residual astigmatism. This study has shown its efficacy and safety in this indication. Its originality lies in the one-step procedure, with the flap and photoablation done in a single step. However, it is still dependent on the operator and most particularly the equipment (laser, microkeratome, aberrometry).

Amniotic membrane corrects surgically induced astigmatism

Human amniotic membrane (AM) has been widely used for the reconstruction of ocular surface. We conducted this study to investigate whether AM shows efficacy in maintaining the correction of astigmatism or not. We performed photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) on rabbits and grafted AM on the cornea. The effect of AM on the degree of astigmatism was evaluated by topography and cycloplegic refraction. As will be shown, AM did not show any efficacy in maintaining the correction of astigmatism. On the contrary, AM not only eliminated PARK-induced astigmatism but prevented surgically induced astigmatism. We suggest that AM could be a useful tool for controlling the astigmatism induced by laser refractive surgery. Further clinical study is still left to be elucidated.

Elliptical ELSA (LASEK) instruments for the treatment of astigmatism

PURPOSE

To investigate newly designed, elliptical ELSA (excimer laser subepithelial ablation) instruments for the treatment of astigmatism.

SETTING

University Eye Clinic Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, and the Rayne Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

METHODS

The new ELSA instrument set consists of an elliptical microtrephine (11.0 mm x 8.0 mm) with a 70 microm calibrated blade and an elliptical alcohol cone (11.5 mm x 8.5 mm). With this instrument set, ELSA (the laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy [LASEK] described by Camellin) was performed in 34 astigmatic eyes. The cylindrical correction was between 1.00 diopters (D) and 3.50 D and the spherical correction, between -0.75 D and -8.75 D. In all eyes, the follow-up was 6 months. The postoperative refractive outcome was analyzed using Alpins vector analysis.

RESULTS

Excimer laser subepithelial ablation was performed without intraoperative complications in all eyes. At 6 months, the mean spherical correction was -0.04 D +/- 0.27 (SD) (range +0.75 to -0.75 D) and the mean cylindrical correction, 0.27 +/- 0.23 D (range 0 to 0.75 D). The mean index of success was 0.18 +/- 0.15.

CONCLUSIONS

With the elliptical instruments, ELSA was an effective and safe surgical procedure for astigmatism.

Scraping and Mitomycin C to Treat Haze and Regression After Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictability of therapeutic scraping and application of a diluted 0.02% mitomycin C solution to treat haze and regression after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia.

METHODS

We performed a non-comparative, non-randomized retrospective study of 35 eyes of 30 patients who had previously undergone PRK for myopia and developed haze and regression after treatment. The range of refractive error after regression was -0.75 to -5.50 D (mean -2.92 D). Haze, ranging from grade 3 to 4 (scale: 0 to 4) caused a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity loss of 1 to 6 Snellen lines. All eyes were treated 6 to 12 months after PRK by scraping the stromal surface and application of a 0.02% mitomycin C solution for 2 minutes using a soaked merocel sponge. No laser ablation was performed. Corneal transparency, refractive error, and visual outcomes were evaluated over a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

All eyes had significant improvement in corneal transparency. Thirty-one eyes had haze grades lower than 1, which were maintained over time. Only four eyes showed haze grades 1 to 2 and two of them needed further treatment using the same technique. At 12 months after treatment, all eyes were within +/-1.50 of original intended correction (mean 0.04 +/- 0.63 D). BSCVA improved in all eyes. No toxic effects were observed during re-epithelialization or during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Single application of diluted mitomycin C 0.02% solution following scraping of the corneal surface was effective and safe in treating haze and regression after PRK.

Evaluation of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for medium and high myopia in eyes that were not good candidates for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Carones Ophthalmology Center, Milan, Italy.

METHODS

This prospective randomized masked study comprised 60 consecutive eyes (60 patients). The inclusion criteria were a spherical equivalent correction between -6.00 and -10.00 diopters (D) and inadequate corneal thickness to allow a LASIK procedure with a residual stromal thickness of more than 250 microm. The eyes were divided into 2 groups according to the randomization protocol. After PRK, the study group eyes were treated with a single intraoperative dose of mitomycin-C (0.2 mg/mL), applied topically with a soaked microsponge placed over the ablated area and maintained for 2 minutes. The control eyes did not receive this treatment. Refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and slitlamp evidence of corneal opacity (haze) or other visible complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

No toxic or side effects were encountered postoperatively. No study group eye had a haze rate higher than 1 during the 6-month follow-up; 19 eyes (63%) in the control group did (P =.01). At 6 months, the between-group difference in the refractive outcome was statistically significant (P =.05), with 26 study group eyes (87%) and 14 control eyes (47%) within +/-0.50 D of the attempted correction. No study group eye had a BCVA loss during the follow-up; 7 control eyes had lost 1 to 3 lines at 6 months (P =.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic use of a diluted mitomycin-C 0.02% solution applied intraoperatively in a single dose after PRK produced lower haze rates, better UCVA and BCVA results, and more accurate refractive outcomes than those achieved in the control group.

Photorefractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism with the MEL-70 G-Scan excimer laser

PURPOSE

To assess the safety, efficacy, predictability and stability of photorefractive keratectomy in compound myopic astigmatism with a moderate and high cylinder component.

METHODS

Photorefractive keratectomy was done in 42 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism with the spherocylindrical algorithm of the MEL-70 excimer laser, with wide ablation zones.

RESULTS

Spherical equivalent refraction changed from -4.19 +/- 1.65D to -0.05 +/- 0.31D, refractive cylinder from -2.01 +/- 0.71D to -0.09 +/- 0.20D and mean sphere from -3.22 +/- 1.76D to -0.02 +/- 0.26D. Mean uncorrected visual acuity rose from 0.12 +/- 0.17 to 0.91 +/- 0.10. No eye lost lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 and the efficacy index 0.98. Six months from the treatment all eyes were within +/- 1D, 8.9% of eyes were within 0.50D and 44% were plano of target refraction. Refractive and topographical stability were achieved between one and three months after treatment. Transient haze was observed between one and three months after PRK.

CONCLUSIONS

Photorefractive keratectomy with the MEL-70 excimer laser to correct myopic astigmatism was a safe and effective procedure with good stability at six months' follow-up. Refractive and visual outcome confirmed that excellent predictability can be expected.

Laser in situ Keratomileusus for Mixed and Simple Myopic Astigmatism With the Nidek EC-5000 Laser

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for mixed and simple myopic astigmatism using bitoric ablation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in 65 eyes of 38 consecutive patients to evaluate uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and cyclopegic and manifest refraction, before and 3 and 6 months after LASIK (Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome, Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser).

RESULTS

At 3 and 6 months after LASIK, 40 eyes of 24 patients (64.5%) were available for follow-up examination. Mean age was 25.9 +/- 6.6 years (range 18 to 43 yr). Mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction was -1.40 +/- 0.80 D (range -3.80 to +0.50 D) mean preoperative cylinder was -3.30 +/- 1.30 D (range -1.00 to -6.00 D). At 6 months follow-up, mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was +0.30 +/- 0.46 D (range -0.38 to +1.88 D), mean cylinder was -0.73 +/- 0.61 D (range -2.25 to 0 D). There was a 77.8% decrease in astigmatism magnitude. According to vector analysis, mean achieved vector magnitude was 80% of intended. Fifty percent (20 eyes) had a cylinder within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. Twenty-three eyes (57.5%) had a spherical component within +/- 0.50 D. Eighty-five percent (34 eyes) had postoperative UCVA of 20/40 or better. Ten percent (four eyes) lost two lines of Snellen BSCVA, whereas 35% (14 eyes) gained one or more lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Bitoric LASIK with the Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome and Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was effective and safe for the reduction of cylinder in mixed and simple myopic astigmatism. Moderate undercorrection of the cylinder was evident.

Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Myopic Astigmatism With the Nidek EC-5000 Laser

PURPOSE

We studied the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate to high simple and compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Ninety-two eyes of 46 consecutive patients who had LASIK for myopic astigmatism (64 eyes, astigmatism 3.00 to 9.00 D; myopia 0 to -20.00 D), or simple myopia (28 eyes, myopia -4.00 to -20.00 D; astigmatism 0 to 0.50 D) were retrospectively studied. Mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction (SE) in the myopia group was -8.11 +/- 3.94 D and in the astigmatism group, -8.55 +/- 4.49 D. All eyes underwent LASIK using the Nidek EC-5000 laser by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

At 6 months after LASIK in the myopia group versus the astigmatism group, 24 eyes (85%) vs. 54 eyes (84%) were available for follow-up, 12 eyes (50%) vs. 13 eyes (24%) had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20, 19 eyes (79%) vs. 44 eyes (81%) had UCVA of 20/40, 8 eyes (33%) vs. 18 eyes (33%) had SE within +/- 0.50 D, 15 eyes (62%) vs. 39 eyes (72%) had SE within +/- 1.00 D, and mean SE was -1.22 +/- 1.17 D vs. -0.74 +/- 1.46 D. Mean astigmatism (vertexed to the corneal plane) in the astigmatism group was 2.77 D at 0 degrees before surgery and 0.32 D at 7 degrees at 6 months. None of the myopic eyes and three of the astigmatic eyes (5%) lost > or = 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 laser for myopic astigmatism was reasonably effective, predictable, and safe. Astigmatism was under-corrected with the nomogram implemented in this study.

Toric intraocular lens implantation: 100 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the first 100 consecutive cases of toric posterior chamber silicone intraocular lens (IOL) implantation by 2 community-based ophthalmologists.

SETTING

Two private practices in western Virginia, USA.

METHODS

Data on the first 100 consecutive toric IOL implantations in 81 patients were collected in a prospective manner. Cataract surgery was performed using topical anesthesia and phaco-chop, phaco-flip, or divide-and-conquer phacoemulsification. A Staar AA4203TF or AA4203TL IOL with a 2.00 diopter (D) or 3.50 D toric power was implanted using a lens injector. After the viscoelastic material was removed, the IOL was rotated to the desired orientation. The IOL orientation was assessed postoperatively at 1 day, 1 to 2 weeks, and the last visit. The mean follow-up was 23 weeks +/- 17 (SD).

RESULTS

The IOLs performed in a predicable fashion. The mean astigmatism correction with IOLs within 15 degrees of the intended axis was 1.62 D with the 2.00 D IOL and 2.86 D with the 3.50 D IOL. Eleven patients had IOLs that were rotated more than 15 degrees away from the intended axes; in 3, the astigmatism was worse than preoperatively. The mean preoperative refractive and keratometric astigmatism was 2.48 D and 2.11 D, respectively. The mean postoperative astigmatism was 0.87 D and 2.05 D, respectively. At the last follow-up, half the patients had residual refractive astigmatism of 0.50 D or less and 45% had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better. Of postoperative patients with a 20/30 visual acuity with or without correction, 52% could see this well no correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that toric IOL implantation can help an estimated 20% of patients with astigmatism achieve good vision and a reduced need for distance spectacles. If IOL rotation occurs, it is usually during the first week and can be remedied by repositioning the IOL at 1 week.

Poly(methyl methacrylate) model study of optical surface quality after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate lenses produced by excimer laser ablation of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) plates.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

METHODS

Two Nidek EC-5000 scanning-slit excimer laser systems were used to ablate plane-parallel plates of PMMA. The ablated lenses were examined by focimetry, interferometry, and mechanical surface profiling.

RESULTS

The spherical optical powers of the lenses matched the expected values, but the cylindrical powers were generally lower than intended. Interferometry revealed marked irregularity in the surface of negative corrections, which often had a positive "island" at their center. Positive corrections were generally smoother. These findings were supported by the results of mechanical profiling. Contrast sensitivity measurements carried out when observing through ablated lenses whose power had been neutralized with a suitable spectacle lens of opposite sign confirmed that the surface irregularities of the ablated lenses markedly reduced contrast sensitivity over a range of spatial frequencies.

CONCLUSION

Improvements in beam delivery systems seem desirable.

Outcome of corneal and laser astigmatic axis alignment in photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To compare the refractive results of laser astigmatic treatment in eyes in which the astigmatic axes of the eye and laser are aligned by limbal marking at the 6 o'clock position and in eyes that are not marked.

SETTING

University Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 143 eyes that had photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy with the VISX Star excimer laser. The eyes were divided into marked (G1) and unmarked (G2) groups. Based on the preoperative astigmatism, each group was subdivided into low astigmatism (</=1.00 diopter [D]) and high astigmatism (>/=1.25 D). Early postoperative manifest refractions (1.0 to 2.5 months) were analyzed. The Alpins vector analysis method was used to calculate the target induced astigmatism, surgically induced astigmatism, difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME), angle of error (AE), and index of success (IS).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups in DV, ME, and IS. When the subgroups were analyzed, the DV and ME were comparable; the IS in the G1 high astigmatism subgroup was significantly better than that in the G2 high astigmatism subgroup (0.22 +/- 0.08 and 0.29 +/- 0.04, respectively; P <.0001). There was comparable scatter of AE values; 30% and 36% in G1 and G2, respectively, had an AE of 0. Similar scatter was observed in the subgroups. Of the eyes that had an AE of 0, 90% and 43% in the high astigmatism subgroups of G1 and G2, respectively (P <.05), had full correction of astigmatism.

CONCLUSION

Limbal marking and subsequent eye and laser astigmatic axis alignment improved the refractive outcome of laser astigmatic treatment of >/=1.25 D. A preliminary report of an ongoing prospective randomized study of eyes that had laser in situ keratomileusis is included.

Toric intraocular lenses for correcting astigmatism in 130 eyes

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the results after implantation of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism in patients undergoing either cataract or clear lens extraction surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred thirty eyes of 99 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and posterior chamber toric IOL implantation from January 1997 through February 1998 were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

Implantation of a toric IOL was performed after cataract surgery (122 eyes) or clear lens extraction surgery (eight eyes). Both preoperative corneal cylinder and refractive cylinder powers were more than 1.50 diopters (D) for all the eyes included in this study. To provide a comparison, we also studied 51 eyes of 45 patients meeting the same preoperative criteria for degree of corneal and refractive cylinder who underwent implantation of a spherical (nontoric) IOL combined with limbal relaxing incisions. The data for both study and comparison groups were analyzed retrospectively. The selection for the two groups was arbitrary.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), mean spherical equivalent, residual refractive cylinder, and toric IOL axis.

RESULTS

In the toric IOL group, 84% of eyes achieved 20/40 or better UCVA. In the spherical IOL group, 76% achieved 20/40 or better UCVA. The mean postoperative refractive cylinder was -1.03 +/- 0.79 D in the toric IOL group and -1.49 +/- 0.75 D in the spherical IOL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that phacoemulsification and posterior chamber toric IOL implantation is a largely predictable new surgical option to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism in cataract or clear lens extraction surgery.

Paracentral photoablations to correct higher grades of naturally occurring astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of paracentral ablations in treating higher degrees of naturally occurring myopic and hyperopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Augenklinik, Kreiskrankenhaus Bad Hersfeld, Germany.

METHODS

Twenty-five eyes (7 with hyperopia, 18 with myopia) with naturally occurring corneal astigmatism greater than 1.75 diopters (D) were treated by excimer laser. The mean refractive cylinder was -4.05 D +/- 1.46 (SD) (range -1.75 to -7.00 D). The intention was to reduce the astigmatism without consideration of the spherical refractive error. Two paracentral ablations were performed by photorefractive keratectomy with treatment zones of 3.5 mm in the flatter meridian of the cornea. Objective refraction, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), changes in corneal radius, development of haze, and regression were recorded.

RESULTS

The paracentral ablations induced a steepening of the corneal radius in the flatter meridian from 8.12 mm (mean preoperative value) to 7. 84 mm (mean postoperative value) and thus reduced the mean refractive cylinder to -1.12 +/- 0.82 D (range 0.00 to - 3.00 D), corresponding to a mean reduction of 78%. No eye experienced a loss of Snellen lines. The preoperative BCVA (mean 20/25; range 20/50 to 20/20) was unchanged postoperatively

CONCLUSIONS

Paracentral ablations resulted in a stable corneal curvature immediately after epithelial healing, with a moderate regression over time. Paracentral ablations with the excimer laser appear to be a safe and effective method to correct higher grades of corneal astigmatism.

Selective zonal ablations with excimer laser for correction of irregular astigmatism induced by refractive surgery

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of selective zonal ablations with excimer laser for the correction of irregular astigmatism induced by refractive surgery.

DESIGN

Thirty-one eyes of 26 patients. Retrospective and noncomparative case series.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical results of the two series of consecutive cases of irregular astigmatism induced by refractive surgery. One group showed a topography map with a defined pattern: decentered ablation, decentered steep central island, central irregularity, and peripheral irregularity. The other group showed an irregular astigmatism without defined pattern. Selective zonal ablation was performed with a broad-beam excimer laser. Laser ablations were adjusted according to the Munnerlyn formula. A phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) mode was used in all cases without using viscous masking solution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and Holladay diagnostic summary (Eye Sys 2.000) were considered before and after surgery to obtain the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the visual acuity and corneal topography. The corneal uniformity index (CUI) was used to evaluate the corneal surface changes induced by the selective zonal ablations in the correction of irregular astigmatism. It proved to be a useful tool in the understanding of astigmatic changes when it is not possible to apply the vector analysis.

RESULTS

In group 1, the irregular astigmatism was significantly improved in 96.4% of cases. The CUI was improved from 58+/-0.3% to 87+/-0.8%, P < 0.005 (Student's t-test). The improvement of the BCVA was from 20/40+/-20/100 to 20/25+/-20/100, P < 0.005 (Student's t-test). The results obtained in group 2 were not clinically significant in terms of improvement of CUI and BCVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the corneal topographic map as a guide, selective zonal ablations with excimer laser can be used to create a more regular corneal surface, when a defined pattern of topographic irregularities can be defined.

Photoastigmatic Refractive Keratectomy or Laser in situ Keratomileusis for Moderate and High Myopic Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) to treat moderate and higher myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

A retrospective nonrandomized study of 78 eyes with myopic astigmatism (range, 2.00 to 6.00 D) was undertaken. Thirty-eight eyes were treated with LASDK and 40 eyes were treated with PARK. Groups were similar in terms of baseline sphere and refraction. Photoablation for both LASDX and PARK was performed by single pass for correction of -6.00 D or less spherical equivalent refraction or multi-pass, multi-zone at 4, 5, and 6 mm for corrections greater than -6.00 D. Astigmatism was corrected using a single-pass ablation at 6.0 mm diameter. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal topography, and patient satisfaction were measured preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Six months postoperatively, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 100% of LASEK eyes and 90.0% of PARK eyes; 20/25 in 86.84% LASEK eyes and 47.5% of PARK eyes; 20/20 in 65.75% of LASEK eyes and 15% of PARK eyes. Postoperative residual cylinder was -0.54 ± 0.32 D in LASEK eyes and -1.28 ± 0.80 D in PARK eyes. Postoperative residual cylinder axis remained stable (within 15° at 1 month postoperatively) in 61.1% of LASEK eyes and 40% of PARK eyes. In 5.3% of the LASEK eyes, corneal haze developed; 95.5% of PARK eyes developed corneal haze. One LASIK eye lost best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and 3 eyes (7.89%) had a cap complication. Three eyes (7.5%) lost 2 lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to severe corneal haze. Among LASEK patients, 92.1% were highly satisfied and 62.5% of PARK patients were highly satisfied.

CONCLUSION

For myopic astigmatism between 2.00 and 6.00 D, LASEK provided better accuracy, fewer complications, and higher patient satisfaction than PARK. PARK may achieve an incomplete cylindrical correction and may have a higher associated rist of loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. [J Refract Surg 2000;16(suppl):S268-S271).

Photoastigmatic Refractive Keratectomy in Myopes

PURPOSE

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) was studied in a multi-center clinical trial. The Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was evaluated for its effect on refraction, visual acuity, and safety measures as part of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated study.

METHODS

Eight U.S. centers enrolled adults with eyes having refractive astigmatism up to 4.00 D and a myopic spherical equivalent refraction up to -8.00 D. Results are reported for 749 eyes of 486 patients with at least 6 months follow-up. The rectangular beam scanning Nidek EC-5000 used a 5.5-mm-diameter treatment zone, a 7.0-mm-diameter peripheral blend zone, and a 40 Hz pulse rate for surface treatment of myopic astigmatism. Nomogram corrections to machine settings were required to achieve the desired results.

RESULTS

Preoperative average spherical equivalent refraction of -4.90+/-1.74 D was reduced to -0.02+/-0.79 D at 6 months. Refractive stability was established at 3 months. Over 62% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of desired correction at 6 months, with over 86% within +/-1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity improved by an average of 10 Snellen lines; over 64% of eyes saw 20/20 or better uncorrected and over 93% saw 20/40 or better uncorrected at 6 and 12 months. PARK treatment effectively reduced astigmatism with little average axis error or magnitude error. Corneal haze and safety concerns were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser provided significant reduction of myopia and astigmatism, with minimal complications.

Excimer ablation design and elliptical transition zones

PURPOSE

To describe the rationale behind elliptical and other transition designs used with the excimer laser.

SETTING

Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

METHODS

Ablation zone designs were analyzed for the number of transition points for myopia and hyperopia. The advantages and disadvantages of elliptical transition zones are demonstrated graphically, with an emphasis on smooth ablation zone design to maximize the optics and biologic tolerance by the eye.

RESULTS

The use of an individualized elliptical transition maximizes a circular effective optical zone and can enhance the smoothness of the transition zone while minimizing excessive tissue removal.

CONCLUSION

Elliptical transition zones may improve the optics and biologic tolerance of excimer laser treatments.

One year clinical results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of excimer laser photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) to correct compound myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Departments of Ophthalmology, Robert Debré Hospital and Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 27 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism treated with a Nidek EC 5000 excimer laser. The refractive results were measured at 1 year, and the cylindrical component was analyzed by the Alpins method. Mean preoperative myopia was -4.50 diopters (D) (range -0.75 to -4.00 D) and mean preoperative cylinder, -1.64 D (range -0.75 to -4.00 D).

RESULTS

At 1 year, the spherical equivalent was -0.47 D (range +1.00 to -3.00 D) and residual subjective astigmatism, -0.40 (range -0.25 to -1.50 D). Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was obtained in 22 of the 27 eyes; 21 eyes were within +/- 1.0 D of emmetropia. Vector analysis showed a mean coefficient adjustment of 1.50 D +/- 0.53 (SD), a mean axis shift of 2.64 +/- 12.10 degrees, and a mean magnitude of error of 0.45 +/- 0.56 D. Haze was absent in 22 eyes and grade 1+ in 5 eyes. Five eyes gained 1 line of best corrected visual acuity and 3 lost 1 line. No patient lost more than 1 line.

CONCLUSION

Excimer laser PARK successfully corrected low and moderate myopia combined with up to 4.0 D of astigmatism with a low mean angle of error. To increase the accuracy of toric ablation, specific algorithms for the cylinder component are needed.

Astigmatism Outcomes Following Spherical Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to examine the change in astigmatism after spherical photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). These effects are essential to optimizing photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) to correct astigmatism to within fractions of a diopter.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 98 eyes of 178 patients with mild to moderate myopia and cylinder < or = 1.00 diopter (D) treated with spherical PRK (VISX 20/20 STAR excimer laser system); 31 eyes had epithelium removed mechanically with a blade and 67 eyes by a laser-scrape technique.

RESULTS

Refractive astigmatism was reduced by greater than 0.25 D in 27 eyes (28%); refractive astigmatism was induced by greater than 0.25 D in 31 eyes (32%); the average vector-corrected difference between an eye's astigmatism before and after surgery was 0.01 +/- 0.52 D (P = .85). Eyes with high topographic astigmatism but low refractive cylinder before PRK showed an average of 0.07 +/- -0.60 D change in refractive cylinder after PRK. Refractive astigmatism of more than 0.25 D was induced in 16 eyes (44%) that received manual removal of epithelium versus 15 eyes (24%) that received laser removal of epithelium (odds ratio 2.51, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

When using PRK for astigmatism correction, refractive cylinder before surgery rather than topographic astigmatism may be the most appropriate method for targeting the astigmatism correction, especially when the two values are discordant. An unpredictable mild increase or decrease in astigmatism may be expected.

Excimer laser treatment of myopic astigmatism. A comparison of three ablation programs

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the precision, accuracy, and safety of three different modes of excimer laser surgery for myopic astigmatism.

DESIGN

A prospective interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 150 eyes with compound myopic astigmatism were treated.

INTERVENTION

Ablation programs included the VISX Twenty/Twenty excimer laser using either the sequential mode (58 eyes) or the elliptical mode (54 eyes) and the Technolas-Chiron Keracor 116 hybrid scanning laser (38 eyes).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in cylinder and sphere, vector analysis (polar values), uncorrected visual acuity, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were evaluated at 1, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

By 12 months, sphere was reduced by 95.1%, 87.7%, and 75% in low-astigmatism eyes treated with the VISX sequential, VISX elliptical, and Technolas modes, respectively, and by 92.2%, 98%, and 77.6% in high-astigmatism eyes. By 12 months, cylinder was reduced by 51.5%, 72.2%, and 36.3% in low-astigmatism eyes and by 70%, 78%, and 45.6%, respectively, in high-astigmatism eyes. Vector analysis showed that the elliptical treatment produced more significant reductions in mean polar values than the other two treatments at various timepoints.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the ablation approach may influence the clinical result.

Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for primary treatment and revision of myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results in 43 eyes treated with a rotating mask for myopic astigmatism and followed for up to 1 year.

SETTING

Lucerne Eye Clinic, Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (42 eyes) were selected to have photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK). In 33% (14 eyes), this treatment was the second or third ablation. The Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 excimer laser was operated in toe scanning slit mode, and a rotating mask was used. To evaluate cylindrical shaping, vector analysis was performed.

RESULTS

One year after PARK, mean uncorrected visual acuity in all patients (26 eyes) improved from 20/160 preoperatively to 20/40. Surgically induced astigmatism in 20 of 26 eyes (77%) was within +/- 1.00 diopter (D) of the targeted induced astigmatism. At 1 year, 81% of patients who had primary excimer laser treatment for myopic astigmatism equivalent to -10.00 D or less were within +/- 1.00 D of target refraction compared with 44% of re-treated eyes.

CONCLUSION

The result of PARK in eyes with low to moderate degrees of myopic astigmatism was satisfactory. However, in eyes with extensive scarring and wound healing activity after the first ablation, re-treatment was less predictable.

Photoastigmatic Refractive Keratectomy for Compound Myopic Astigmatism with a Nidek Laser

BACKGROUND

With advances in the delivery of excimer laser energy to the cornea, spherocylindrical ablations are now possible. The refractive and visual outcome of eyes undergoing photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy with a minimum of 12 months follow-up are presented.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 160 consecutive eyes that underwent photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using the Nidek EC5000 excimer laser was undertaken. One year follow-up data were available on 89 eyes. Vector analysis of the change in cylindrical error, by the Alpins method, was performed. Before surgery, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -5.68 diopters (D) (SD 2.67 D) with a mean cylinder power of -1.40 D (SD 0.75).

RESULTS

At 1 year after surgery, the mean spherical equivalent was -0.44 D (SD 0.87). Seventy-one eyes (79.8%) had a spherical equivalent within 1.00 D of the target refraction and 79 eyes (89%) achieved 6/12 or better, unaided. Four of 89 eyes (4.5%) lost more than two lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity with 9 eyes (10%) gaining Snellen acuity, comparing preoperative spectacle-corrected acuity with postoperative uncorrected visual acuity. The mean coefficient of adjustment (targeted induced astigmatism vector magnitude divided by surgically induced astigmatism vector magnitude) was 1.11 (SD 1.33), indicating undercorrection of the cylinder. The mean angle of error was 0.73 degree (+/- 10.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive visual acuity outcome after photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy was good. Current algorithms undercorrect the cylinder power, but are adequately aligned. Algorithms for toric ablations in the Nidek EC5000 need to be improved.

Excimer photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia and astigmatism with the Coherent-Schwind Keratom

PURPOSE

To summarize the initial results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in 114 eyes of 89 patients using the Coherent-Schwind system and assess its safety, efficacy, and predictability.

SETTING

Hospital San Jose de Monterrey-ITESM, Mexico.

METHODS

The Coherent-Schwind Keratom excimer laser was used to correct low myopia (manifest spherical equivalent from -1.00 to -6.00 diopters [D], with manifest cylinder of -1.00 D or less) or myopic astigmatism (manifest spherical equivalent from -2.75 to -6.75 D, with manifest cylinder from -1.00 to -4.50 D) with standard settings. Ablation zone diameters were from 5.9 to 6.3 mm (low myopia) and 5.9 to 8.2 mm (astigmatism) with a repetition rate of 12 Hz. Follow-up was from 1 month (low myopia, n = 71; astigmatism, n = 35) to 6 months (low myopia, n = 36; astigmatism, n = 17).

RESULTS

Six months after PRK, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 94% of the low myopia eyes (n = 36) and 77% of the astigmatism eyes (n = 17). Intended correction was within 1.00 D of the target spherical equivalent in 81 and 88% of eyes, respectively. No eyes in the low myopia group lost two lines of best corrected visual acuity, although 12% in the astigmatism group did.

CONCLUSION

The Coherent-Schwind excimer laser appears to be effective in the treatment of low myopia and astigmatism, with results comparable to those of other laser systems after 6 months of follow-up. Further study of best corrected visual acuity loss after treatment of compound myopic astigmatism with this laser is warranted.

Photorefractive Keratectomy for Hyperopic and Mixed Astigmatism

BACKGROUND

The correction of astigmatism with photorefractive keratectomy has been recommended in simple and myopic astigmatism. Therefore in this study the excimer laser was used to correct compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism.

METHODS

We present a prospective clinical study of photorefractive keratectomy in 30 eyes of 24 patients with compound hyperopic astigmatism with a mean spherical equivalent of +4.30 D and mean astigmatism of 2.33 D (group I) and in 17 eyes of 15 patients with mixed astigmatism with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of +0.46 D and mean astigmatism of 4.75 D (group II). The excimer laser used in this study was an MEL 60 (Aesculap-Meditec). In both groups an 18-month follow-up study was performed.

RESULTS

In the compound hyperopic astigmatism group after 18 months, 14 of 17 treated eyes (82.3%) were within +/-1.00 D, and 11 (64.7%) were within 60.50 D of the intended correction. In the mixed astigmatism group after 18 months, 10 of 11 eyes (90.9%) were within +/-1.00 D, 8 eyes (72.7%) were within +/-0.50 D of the intended correction. In regard to the stability the 1 year regression of spherical equivalent in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group is 0.78 D and in the mixed astigmatism group 0.37 D. At 18 months, spectacle corrected visual acuity in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group was unchanged or improved in 14 eyes (87.5%); 2 eyes (12.5%) had lost one line. In the mixed astigmatism group at 18 months, spectacle corrected visual acuity was unchanged or improved in 9 eyes (81.8 %); 2 eyes (18.1%) lost one line. Preoperatively, the mean uncorrected visual acuity was 20/100 in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group and the mixed astigmatism group. At 18 months, 14 eyes (93.3%) in the compound hyperopic astigmatism group had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better; 4 (26.6%) eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. In the mixed astigmatism group, 9 (81.8%) eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better; 4 (36.3%) eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better.

CONCLUSION

Photorefractive keratectomy is an efficient and relatively safe procedure for reducing or eliminating compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism up to 6.00 D.

Astigmatic change 1 year after excimer laser treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

SETTING

Royal Victorian Ear and Eye Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

METHODS

This study comprised 333 PARK patients and 155 PRK patients treated with a VISX 20/20 excimer laser and followed prospectively for 12 months. Vector analysis of the change in astigmatism was used to calculate the SIA in the PRK group and the percentage of astigmatism corrected in the PARK group.

RESULTS

Among patients with low cylinders astigmatic correction varied greatly, particularly in those treated for large amounts of myopia. The spherical PRK treatments yielded a mean induced postoperative astigmatism of 0.47 diopter. There was a linear relationship between this inadvertent SIA and increasing myopia.

CONCLUSION

Excimer laser surgery for myopia creates a low degree of random, unpredictable SIA that may be the result of irregular epithelial thickening during postoperative healing. This creates a background noise of astigmatic change upon which the targeted astigmatic correction is superimposed.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy to correct astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct astigmatism.

SETTING

Hôpital Morvan, Brest, France.

METHODS

A 193 nm excimer laser was used to perform toric ablation with an expanding slit to flatten the cornea in the steeper meridian and/or to correct myopia with an iris diaphragm in 72 eyes (55 patients): 68 eyes for compound myopic astigmatism and 4 for astigmatism only.

RESULTS

Preoperative cylinder was -2.14 diopters (D) +/- 1.99 (SD) (range -0.50 to -5.50 D); 6 months postoperatively, it was -1.75 +/- 1.34 D (range -0.25 to -5.25 D). Preoperative spherical equivalent was -5.33 +/- 3.22 D (range -0.25 to -14.50 D); 6 months postoperatively, it was -0.86 +/- 2.32 D (range 2.50 to -9.75 D). The axial error was within 30 degrees. Uncorrected visual acuity was 0.50 or better in 64.5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall patient satisfaction seemed the result of the myopic correction; cylindrical correction was incomplete. Future software refinements should improve the results. In particular, single elliptical ablation seems to offer theoretical advantages.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy using an erodible mask to treat myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using an erodible mask to treat myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Douglas Memorial Hospital Medical Centre, Fore Erie, Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

Photorefractive keratectomy was done on 25 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with myopic astigmatism using the OmniMed excimer laser and a compound single-use myopic erodible mask manufactured to produce a specific spherical and cylindrical correction for each individual patient. Follow-up ranged from 6 months for 25 patients to 1 year for 5 patients.

RESULTS

Six months after PRK, the mean preoperative sphere of -7.46 diopters (D) decreased to -0.17 D and the mean preoperative cylinder of 2.31 D dropped to 0.69 D; 73% of astigmatism was corrected. In the five eyes followed for 1 year, 94% of astigmatism was corrected. Correction of the myopic component was less predictable, with a wider than anticipated range of overcorrection.

CONCLUSIONS

Excimer laser PRK successfully corrected myopic astigmatism in patients with low and high myopia. The less predictable myopia results may have been secondary to increased procedure time, corneal dehydration, and difficulty in patient fixation and thus alignment.

One-year follow-up results of photorefractive keratectomy for low, moderate, and high primary astigmatism

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for high, moderate, and low degrees of primary myopic astigmatism.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-two eyes of 54 patients with different degrees of compound myopic astigmatism underwent PRK. The eyes were divided by degree of refractive astigmatism into three groups-high (-2.75 to -5.0 diopters [D]), moderate (-1.25 to -2.50 D), and low (< or = 1.0 D). Refraction, corneal topography, slit-lamp findings, and visual acuity with and without correction were assessed.

RESULTS

At 12 months, the mean reduction from the preoperative refractive cylinder was 80.7% in the high astigmatism group, 68.4% in the moderate astigmatism group, and 47.6% in the low astigmatism group. The post-treatment residual cylinder axis remained stable in 23 (38.3%) of 60 eyes and deviated in 37 (61.7%) of 60 eyes. The maximal deviation of the residual cylinder axis was 15 degrees. Of the 89.2% of eyes with low cylinder, 81.8% had moderate cylinder, and 85% of the eyes with high cylinder achieved a final uncorrected visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/35 at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically significant reduction in the refractive cylinder was found in the high, moderate, and low astigmatism groups. The difference between the mean reduction of the high and moderate cylinders compared with the mean reduction of the low cylinders also was found to be statistically significant. The laser used in this study is an efficient tool for correcting high and moderate astigmatism. However, regarding low astigmatism, it was found to be less effective.

Photorefractive Keratectomy for Compound Myopic Astigmatism With an Eye Cup Erodible Mask Delivery System

BACKGROUND

The erodible mask is a new energy delivery system for the 193-nm argon fluoride excimer laser. It consists of a polymethyl-methacrylate button, whose profile is transferred by photoablation onto the corneal surface. We present the 6- and 12-month results of this technique in the correction of compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

We performed the mask procedure on 21 eyes of 16 subjects (mean age, 30.7 years; range, 24 to 46) to correct combined myopia and astigmatism. Attempted myopic correction ranged between -1.50 diopters (D) and -10.00 D (mean, -7.07 D). Attempted astigmatic correction ranged between -1.50 D and -4.00 D (mean, -2.46 D).

RESULTS

Mean procedure error was: sphere +0.74 D (range, -3.00/+5.00), cylinder -1.41 D (range, -3.50/0.00) at 1 month after surgery; sphere +0.18 D (range, -2.50/+ 3.50), cylinder -1.56 D (range, -4.00/0.00) at 6 months; and sphere -1.30 D (range, -3.00/0.00), cylinder was -1.25 D (range, -2.00/-0.50) at 12 months (10 eyes). During follow up, haze values were never higher than 1, except for one case of haze 2 that regressed to 0 during follow up. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity improved in all eyes where emmetropia was envisaged; none of the eyes lost spectacle-corrected visual acuity lines 6 or 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The erodible mask proved effective and fairly predictable mainly in the correction of the spherical component of refractive error, while the correction of astigmatism revealed greater unpredictability, with a constant trend to undercorrection.

Excimer laser correction of high astigmatism after keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of excimer laser correction of high astigmatism after keratoplasty.

SETTING

Kiel University Eye Hospital, Kiel, Germany.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we treated high astigmatism in 16 patients using a 193 nm excimer laser with a rotating mask system to make a toric ablation. Thirteen patients had postkeratoplasty astigmatism, 3, idiopathic natural astigmatism. Preoperative refractive cylinder ranged from 3.0 to 9.0 diopters (D). Minimum follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Mean uncorrected visual acuity increased by 3.3 lines in 13 patients. Best corrected visual acuity decreased by no more than two lines in 6 patients and improved by at least one line in 6 patients. Mean cylindrical reduction was 2.8 D. Haze was classified from 0.5 to 2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the excimer laser technique effectively reduced high corneal astigmatism. The main problems incurred were development of a hyperopic shift and, in some patients, an uncertain refractive outcome. Reasons for inadequate correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism included a slightly decentered mask and irregular astigmatism from the circular scar.

Excimer laser keratectomy for astigmatism occurring after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To review the results of photorefractive keratectomy used to treat astigmatism occurring after penetrating keratoplasty.

METHODS

Seven patients who had undergone corneal transplantation previously and had significant postoperative astigmatism were included. All these patients were intolerant of spectacle and contact lens correction. Excimer laser keratectomy was performed to reduce the astigmatic error. Minimum follow-up of 12 months was necessary for study inclusion.

RESULTS

The average refractive cylinder decreased from 5.32 diopters (D) preoperatively to 2.79 D postoperatively. The refractive cylinder was reduced in six of the seven eyes attempted. The average preoperative keratometric cylinder decreased from 5.54 D (range, 1.50-10.00 D) to 4.00 D (range 1.00-7.50 D) postoperatively. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged (within 1 line) in three eyes, improved in two, and decreased in two. The complications included a loss of at least two lines in spectacle-corrected visual acuity in two eyes and scarring in one.

CONCLUSIONS

Excimer laser keratectomy can reduce the astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. The excellent results in some eyes offer promise for this technique in the future.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy has been used for the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. This laser removes tissue through a process termed photoablative decomposition, in which incident photon energy is sufficient to break molecular bonds. Selective removal of tissue across the anterior corneal surface results in a change in anterior corneal curvature. The surgical outcome may be influenced also by interindividual variability in wound healing and pharmacologic interventions. The nature of the excimer laser-tissue interaction, and clinical outcomes of predictability, stability and complications of surgery for myopia are discussed in detail.

Development of an algorithm for corneal reshaping with a scanning laser beam

The corneal-ablation rate, the beam-intensity distribution, and the initial and the desired corneal topographies are used to calculate a spatial distribution map of laser pulses. The optimal values of the parameters are determined with a computer model, for a system that produces 213-nm radiation with a Gaussian beam-intensity distribution and a peak radiant exposure of 400 mJ/cm(2). The model shows that with a beam diameter of 0.5 mm, an overlap of 80%, and a 5-mm treatment zone, the roughness is less than 6% of the central ablation depth, the refractive error after correction is less than 0.1 D for corrections of myopia of 1, 3, and 6 D and less than 0.4 D for a correction of myopia of 10 D, and the number of pulses per diopter of correction is 2500 when the beam-intensity distribution is Gaussian and 580 when it is flat.

Cyclotorsion in the seated and supine patient

We used Maddox double-rod measurements to determine if positionally induced ocular cyclotorsion occurs when a patient moves from the seated to supine position. Maddox double-rod measurements were determined twice while patients (N = 30) viewed a fixation light at a distance of 7 feet in both the seated and supine positions. The difference between axis measurements made in seated and supine positions was not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference between the two measurements made in the seated and in the supine positions. These data show that the eyes do not undergo positionally induced ocular cyclotorsion when a patient moves from a seated to a supine position.

Correcting myopic astigmatism with an areal 193 nm excimer laser ablation

A new system to correct symmetric bow-tie myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser using oval apertures for toric ablations is described. Initial results in two patients who had -5.0 and -5.5 diopters of astigmatism after surgery with six-months follow-up showed a reduction of up to 85% with a minimal axial error of two degrees.

Lasers in ophthalmology

This article reviews the principle uses of ophthalmic lasers, providing historical background with an emphasis on new applications and areas of investigation. Ophthalmic photocoagulation was the first medical laser application and has restored or maintained vision in millions of people. More recently, photodisruption and, increasingly, ablation have gained prominence for treating a wide range of ocular pathology. The unique properties of lasers have also been harnessed for diagnostic purposes, with optical coherence tomography representing a significant improvement over existing imaging methods. Many ophthalmic applications of lasers have been developed, but the field is a dynamic one which continues to evolve along with laser technology itself.