Clinical experience with the long-term use of 1% apraclonidine. Incidence of allergic reactions

How latanoprost changed glaucoma management

Glaucoma is currently considered one of the leading causes of severe visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Topical medical therapy represents the treatment of choice for many glaucoma patients. Introduction of latanoprost, 25 years ago, with an entirely new mechanism of action from that of the antiglaucoma drugs used up to that time was a very important milestone. Since then, due mainly to their efficacy, limited systemic side effects and once daily dosing, prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) have become as the first-choice treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma. PGAs are in general terms well tolerated, although they are associated with several mild to moderate ocular and periocular adverse events. Among them, conjunctival hyperemia, eyelash changes, eyelid pigmentation, iris pigmentation and hypertrichosis around the eyes are the most prevalent. The objective of this paper is to review the role of PGAs in the treatment of glaucoma over the 25 years since the launch of Latanoprost and their impact on clinical practice outcomes.

Nummular keratitis: A rare manifestation of brimonidine allergy

A 32-year-old male, with juvenile open-angle glaucoma on chronic antiglaucoma therapy and recently introduced brimonidine eye drops to the treatment regimen, developed bilateral follicular conjunctivitis with subepithelial infiltrates (SEIs) initially resembling common infectious keratoconjunctivitis entities. The persistent nature of the conjunctivitis, the lack of positive conjunctival cultures, the absence of systemic symptoms, the full resolution of the condition upon discontinuation of antiglaucoma drops, and the commencement of topical steroids, along with the reappearance of SEIs upon reintroducing brimonidine; suggested an immune-mediated drug reaction secondary to a Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.2% formulation. The interval between the initiation of brimonidine and the onset of the drug reaction was 13 months and shortened to 1 week upon re-exposure to the drug. The condition fully resolved without further sequelae off brimonidine. Brimonidine is notoriously known for causing ocular allergic reactions, the most common being follicular conjunctivitis, but very few reports exist describing its adverse effects on the cornea. This case highlights that brimonidine may directly or indirectly induce an immune reaction affecting the cornea in the form of SEIs. Brimonidine is, thus, capable of mimicking more commonly recognized infectious disease entities causing keratoconjunctivitis. This is the second report of a similar manifestation linked to its use.

Ocular surface disease: a known yet overlooked side effect of topical glaucoma therapy

Ocular surface disease (OSD), a disorder affecting the lacrimal and meibomian glands and the corneal and conjunctival epithelium, is a well-known complication of topical glaucoma therapy. OSD can present as a new or pre-existing condition that virtually any anti-glaucoma formulation can exacerbate. As such, both glaucoma and OSD frequently coexist. Typical OSD symptoms include ocular discomfort, redness, burning, and dryness, whereas signs include periorbital and eyelid skin pigmentation, conjunctival scarring, and superficial punctate keratitis. Pressure-lowering eyedrops can cause toxic, allergic, and inflammatory reactions on the ocular surface. The latter can result from either preservatives or direct toxicity from the active molecule. Although usually mild, OSD can cause significant symptoms that lead to poor quality of life, decreased compliance to therapy, glaucoma progression, and worse visual outcomes. Given the chronic nature of glaucoma, lack of curative therapy, and subsequent lifelong treatment, addressing OSD is necessary. This manuscript aims to provide an up-to-date overview of OSD's signs, symptoms, and pathogenic mechanisms from glaucoma therapy toxicity.

Ocular Surface Disease and Anti-Glaucoma Medications: Various features, Diagnosis, and Management Guidelines

PURPOSE

Assessment of ocular surface in patients using anti-glaucoma medications (AGM) is rarely a priority for clinicians since glaucoma management targets intraocular pressure and preserves vision. This review summarizes the various adverse effects of topical AGM on the ocular surface and highlights the importance of ocular surface assessment in these patients.

METHODS

A literature search of articles (English only) on the subject matter was conducted focusing on recent articles published in the past 5 years.

RESULTS

The use of multiple anti-glaucoma medications in glaucoma patients increases patients' exposure to the drug and the preservatives present in these medications. Long-term use of these medications has deleterious effects on the conjunctiva, cornea, eyelids, and periocular tissues like trichiasis, entropion, symblepharon, forniceal shortening, punctate keratopathy, non-healing epithelial defects, and pannus. Treatment requires drug withdrawal or substitution by oral or topical non-preserved and less toxic preparations of AGMs. The ocular surface and symptoms can improve if the condition is diagnosed early and after drug withdrawal in over 90% of eyes. However, stopping or changing AGMs can often present with its own unique set of challenges in intra-ocular pressure control which may often need glaucoma surgery in close to 20% of eyes for IOP control.

CONCLUSION

Topical antiglaucoma medications (with their preservatives) can induce severe ocular surface and periorbital changes. Early identification and withdrawal of the offending drug/preservative can help to reverse the changes except in eyes with extensive cicatrization.

A rare case of spontaneous expulsive suprachoroidal haemorrhage in a glaucomatous eye treated with topical alpha-adrenergic agonist

Spontaneous expulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage is a rare ocular condition, which usually occurs after sudden decompression of the eyewall. Most of the cases of expulsive hemorrhage reported had a predisposing glaucoma with the combination of corneal pathology. We are reporting a case of spontaneous expulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage in a glaucoma patient probably due to perpetuated inflammatory reaction and frequent eye rubbing induced by allergic reaction to topical alpha adrenergic agonist in a compromised cornea.

Brimonidine related acute follicular conjunctivitis: Onset time and clinical presentations, a long-term follow-up

To evaluate the duration of topical brimonidine therapy before the onset of brimonidine-related allergic conjunctivitis and the clinical characteristics associated with the development of brimonidine allergy.We retrospectively enrolled patients who presented brimonidine allergy from December 1, 2008 to November 30, 2020. The duration of brimonidine treatment, concomitant medications, benzalkonium chloride (BAK) exposure, change in IOP, and season of onset were evaluated.292 patients were included, among which 147 were female and 145 were male. The mean age was 58.3 ± 13.6 years old. The mean (median) duration of brimonidine therapy was 266.6 (196) days, with a peak at 60-120 days. The duration was similar whether the patients received brimonidine monotreatment or in combination with other glaucoma drugs, with or without BAK. The IOP increased by 5.6% after brimonidine allergy (P < .001), which was even higher in the brimonidine monotherapy group (9.2%, P < .001). There was no significant IOP elevation in patients treated with multiple glaucoma medications.Around half of brimonidine allergy occurred within 6 months, with a peak in 2 to 4 months. The duration did not differ in patients receiving brimonidine monotherapy or multiple glaucoma medications. The presence of BAK did not affect the duration either. When brimonidine allergy occurred, there was a loss of IOP control, especially in patients receiving brimonidine monotherapy. It is recommended to switch to other types of glaucoma medications for better IOP control.

Glaucoma: Management and Future Perspectives for Nanotechnology-Based Treatment Modalities

Glaucoma, being asymptomatic for relatively late stage, is recognized as a worldwide cause of irreversible vision loss. The eye is an impervious organ that exhibits natural anatomical and physiological barriers which renders the design of an efficient ocular delivery system a formidable task and challenge scientists to find alternative formulation approaches. In the field of glaucoma treatment, smart delivery systems for targeting have aroused interest in the topical ocular delivery field owing to its potentiality to oppress many treatment challenges associated with many of glaucoma types. The current momentum of nano-pharmaceuticals, in the development of advanced drug delivery systems, hold promises for much improved therapies for glaucoma to reduce its impact on vision loss. In this review, a brief about glaucoma; its etiology, predisposing factors and different treatment modalities has been reviewed. The diverse ocular drug delivery systems currently available or under investigations have been presented. Additionally, future foreseeing of new drug delivery systems that may represent potential means for more efficient glaucoma management are overviewed. Finally, a gab-analysis for the required investigation to pave the road for commercialization of ocular novel-delivery systems based on the nano-technology are discussed.

Effect of brimonidine tartrate on basophil activation in glaucoma patients

AIM

To evaluate the mechanism of which brimonidine tartrate 0.15% causes clinical hypersensitivity.

METHODS

A prospective case-control study comparing 8 glaucoma patients with clinical hypersensitivity to brimonidine to a control group consisting 13 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were stimulated with brimonidine 0.15%, timolol 0.5% or brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate 0.2%/0.5%. Premixed antibodies (CD63/FITC and aIgE/PE) were added for direct staining and whole-blood samples were lysed, fixed and analyzed by a flow cytometer. The basophil population was defined by high IgE cell expression. Degranulation was identified by the expression of the activation molecule CD63.

RESULTS

Basophil activation was not significant when comparing percent of activated basophils of patients and healthy controls after exposure to brimonidine (2.58%, 2.45%, respectively, P=0.72). There was a significant suppression of basophil activation when a combination of brimonidine-timolol (0.87%) was compared to timolol (2.27%; P=0.012) and to brimonidine alone (2.58%; P=0.017).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study do not support the hypothesis that brimonidine induces an immediate allergic reaction. Basophil activation was suppressed by the presence of β-blockers in patients hypersensitive to brimonidine and in healthy individuals. This finding indicates that timolol suppress brimonidine drug reaction by a different mechanism.

Update on the Medical Treatment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Glaucoma comprises a group of progressive, neurodegenerative disorders characterized by retinal ganglion cell death and nerve fiber layer atrophy. Several randomized controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of intraocular pressure lowering to slow or halt the measurable progression of the disease. Medical therapy, in places where it is easily accessible, is often the primary method to lower intraocular pressure. We review the medical options currently available and possible future options currently in development. The 5 contemporary classes of topical agents in use include prostaglandin analogs, beta blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, alpha agonists, and cholinergics. In addition, several fixed combination agents are commercially available. Agents from each of these classes have unique mechanisms of action, adverse effects, and other characteristics that impact how they are used in clinical practice. Despite the plethora of medical options available, there are limitations to topical ophthalmic therapy such as the high rate of noncompliance and local and systemic adverse effects. Alternate and sustained drug delivery models, such as injectable agents and punctal plug delivery systems, may in the future alleviate some such concerns and lead to increased efficacy of treatment while minimizing adverse effects.

Present and New Treatment Strategies in the Management of Glaucoma

Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death and axonal loss. It remains a major cause of blindness worldwide. All current modalities of treatment are focused on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), and it is evident that increased IOP is an important risk factor for progression of the disease. However, it is clear that a significant number of glaucoma patients show disease progression despite of pressure lowering treatments. Much attention has been given to the development of neuroprotective treatment strategies, but the identification of such has been hampered by lack of understanding of the etiology of glaucoma. Hence, in spite of many attempts no neuroprotective drug has yet been clinically approved. Even though neuroprotection is without doubt an important treatment strategy, many glaucoma subjects are diagnosed after substantial loss of RGCs. In this matter, recent approaches aim to rescue RGCs and regenerate axons in order to restore visual function in glaucoma. The present review seeks to provide an overview of the present and new treatment strategies in the management of glaucoma. The treatment strategies are divided into current available glaucoma medications, new pressure lowering targets, prospective neuroprotective interventions, and finally possible neuroregenrative strategies.

The impact of timolol maleate on the ocular tolerability of fixed-combination glaucoma therapies

Glaucomatous optic atrophy is the second most common cause of blindness worldwide, and lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only proven method to slow or stop the progression of the disease. Approximately 40% of patients with elevated IOP will require more than one medication to obtain a modest 20% reduction in IOP, and as a result, some patients may require two medications, provided in either two separate bottles or in one bottle with the use of fixed-combination therapies. Each therapy has its own unique safety and efficacy profile. Topical beta-blockers have a particularly favorable ocular-tolerability profile, and several studies of fixed-combination medications containing the beta-blocker timolol maleate have shown a lower prevalence of some ocular adverse events for the fixed-combination therapy compared to the non-beta-blocker individual component. In this review, we examined clinical data pertaining to the ocular surface tolerability of fixed-combination medications containing timolol maleate in comparison to the individual components. In particular, preference was given to prospective, randomized, multicenter trials of 3 months in duration or longer that compared a fixed-combination therapy to monotherapy with the individual components. A review of the literature revealed that some fixed-combination therapies can provide a reduced risk of common side effects compared to their individual components, with conjunctival hyperemia and ocular allergy being less frequent in some timolol-containing fixed-combination therapies. This effect appears to be most significant for latanoprost 0.005%, bimatoprost 0.03%, and brimonidine 0.2%.

Glaucoma management: relative value and place in therapy of available drug treatments

Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only proven therapeutic intervention for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Despite advances in laser and microsurgical techniques, medical IOP reduction remains the first-line treatment option for the majority of patients with open-angle glaucoma. Prostaglandin analogs are the most efficacious topical agents and carry a remarkable safety profile. Topical beta-blockers, alpha-agonists, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are often employed as adjunctive agents for further IOP control. Newer preserved and nonpreserved formulations are available and appear to be less toxic to the ocular surface. Oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, miotic agents, and hyperosmotics are infrequently used due to a host of potentially serious adverse events. Medical therapies on the horizon include rho-kinase inhibitors, neuroprotective interventions, and gene therapies.

Managing adverse effects of glaucoma medications

Glaucoma is a chronic, progressive disease in which retinal ganglion cells disappear and subsequent, gradual reductions in the visual field ensues. Glaucoma eye drops have hypotensive effects and like all other medications are associated with adverse effects. Adverse reactions may either result from the main agent or from preservatives used in the drug vehicle. The preservative benzalkonium chloride, is one such compound that causes frequent adverse reactions such as superficial punctate keratitis, corneal erosion, conjunctival allergy, and conjunctival injection. Adverse reactions related to main hypotensive agents have been divided into those affecting the eye and those affecting the entire body. In particular, β-blockers frequently cause systematic adverse reactions, including bradycardia, decrease in blood pressure, irregular pulse and asthma attacks. Prostaglandin analogs have distinctive local adverse reactions, including eyelash bristling/lengthening, eyelid pigmentation, iris pigmentation, and upper eyelid deepening. No systemic adverse reactions have been linked to prostaglandin analog eye drop usage. These adverse reactions may be minimized when they are detected early and prevented by reducing the number of different eye drops used (via fixed combination eye drops), reducing the number of times eye drops are administered, using benzalkonium chloride-free eye drops, using lower concentration eye drops, and providing proper drop instillation training. Additionally, a one-time topical medication can be given to patients to allow observation of any adverse reactions, thereafter the preparation of a topical medication with the fewest known adverse reactions can be prescribed. This does require precise patient monitoring and inquiries about patient symptoms following medication use.

Clinical options for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure

Elevated IOP in clinical practice is usually seen in glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Glaucoma affects 60 million people worldwide and 8.4 million are bilaterally blind from this chronic disease.1 Options for reducing IOP rely on pharmacological agents, laser treatments and surgery which may be penetrating or non-penetrating. The last twenty years has seen significant changes in all of these strategies. This review aims to cover these clinical options and introduce some of the new technologies currently in development for the clinical lowering of IOP.

Recent advances in pharmacotherapy of glaucoma

Glaucoma is a slow progressive degeneration of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and the optic nerve axons, leading to irreversible blindness if left undiagnosed and untreated. Although increased intraocular pressure is a major risk factor of glaucoma, other factors include increased glutamate levels, alterations in nitric oxide (NO) metabolism, vascular alterations and oxidative damage caused by reactive oxygen species. Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness globally, accounting for 12.3% of the total blindness. Glaucoma has been broadly classified as primary or secondary open-angle or angle-closure glaucoma. The primary goal in management of glaucoma is to prevent the risk factor, especially elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), using medications, laser therapy or conventional surgery. The first-line treatment of glaucoma usually begins with the use of a topical selective or nonselective blocker or a prostaglandin analog. Second-line drugs of choice include alpha-agonists and topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Cholinergic agonists are considered third-line treatment options. When a single therapy is not sufficient to lower the IOP, a combination therapy is indicated. To enhance the patient compliance, drug delivery systems like electronic devices, ocular inserts, tansdermal and mechanical drug delivery systems have been developed. Use of viscoelastic agents in ophthalmic formulations, emulsions and soluble ophthalmic drug inserts (SODI) enhance patience compliance and ocular drug delivery in patients in long-term glaucoma therapy. For patients who do not respond to antiglaucoma medications, laser trabeculoplasty and incisional surgery are recommended. Several nutrients and botanicals hold promise for the treatment of glaucoma, but most studies are preliminary, and larger, controlled studies are required. Future directions for the development of a novel therapy glaucoma may target glutamate inhibition, NMDA receptor blockade, exogenously applied neurotrophins, open channel blockers, antioxidants, protease inhibitors and gene therapy.

Effects of common topical antiglaucoma medications on the ocular surface, eyelids and periorbital tissue

Glaucoma affects millions of people around the world. With the baby boom generation aging, the number of people affected by primary open-angle glaucoma in the US is expected to reach 3.3 million by 2020, and about half may not know they have the disease. The treatment of most forms of glaucoma includes the use of topical agents that enhance aqueous humour outflow, reduce aqueous production, or both. Topical intraocular pressure-lowering drugs must penetrate across the tissues of the eye to reach their therapeutic targets. Often, these tissues show the first signs and symptoms of drug toxicity and adverse effects. These include eyelid dermatitis, malpositions, lacrimal system scarring, ocular discomfort upon instillation, tear film instability, conjunctival inflammation, subconjunctival fibrosis, conjunctival epithelium changes, and corneal surface and endothelial impairment. For these reasons, ophthalmologists should evaluate the risks and benefits of ophthalmic medications before initiating therapy, identify the minimum dosages necessary to achieve a therapeutic benefit, and monitor patients for local and systemic adverse effects. Adverse events may be reduced by changing to a different class of topical medication, using corticosteroids, lubricating the eyes frequently, and reducing exposure to preservatives. This in turn can lead to higher levels of adherence to antiglaucoma therapy, improved outcomes and a reduction in the costs associated with long-term glaucoma complications. This article reviews the ocular adverse effects associated with the various classes of topical antiglaucoma drugs, with a particular focus on the ocular surface, eyelids and periorbital tissue.

Update on the role of alpha-agonists in glaucoma management

Glaucoma is the second most common cause of world blindness (following cataract) with estimated cases reaching 79.6 million by 2020. Although the etiology of glaucoma is multi-factorial, intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable factor in glaucoma management proven to alter the natural course of the disease. Among various classes of IOP-lowering medications currently available, alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists are used either as monotherapy, as second-line therapy, or in fixed combination with beta-blockers. Non-selective adrenergic agonists such as epinephrine and dipivefrin are infrequently used today for the treatment of glaucoma or ocular hypertension, and have been replaced by the alpha-2-selective agonists. The use of apraclonidine for IOP reduction in glaucoma or OHT is limited due to a high rate of follicular conjunctivitis. The alpha-2-selective agonist in use today is brimonidine. The brimonidine-purite formulations are preferred to brimonidine-benzalkonium chloride (BAC) formulations due better tolerability while maintaining similar efficacy. Brimonidine is also effective when used in combination with a beta-blocker. Using brimonidine-timolol fixed combination (BTFC) as first-line therapy has an added potential for neuroprotection. This would be a valuable strategy for glaucoma treatment, for patients who are intolerant of prostaglandin analogs, or for patients where prostaglandin analogues are contraindicated as first-line therapy, such as in patients with inflammatory glaucoma.

Comparison of allergy rates in glaucoma patients receiving brimonidine 0.2% monotherapy versus fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%-timolol 0.5% therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of ocular allergy in glaucoma patients prospectively treated with 0.2% brimonidine-0.5% timolol fixed combination (Combigan) compared with the incidence of ocular allergy in patients treated with 0.2% brimonidine (Alphagan) monotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a comparative, non-randomized, single-site, interventional study involving patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or exfoliation syndrome who had not previously used brimonidine in any formulation and had no history of ocular allergy. In one study arm, 102 patients were prospectively treated with twice-daily 0.2% brimonidine-0.5% timolol fixed combination. In the other study arm, medical charts at the same center were reviewed to identify a control group of 102 patients who had been treated with twice-daily 0.2% brimonidine monotherapy. Follow-up was at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months of treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Ocular allergy defined as the presence of follicles and redness severe enough to warrant discontinuation of the medication.

RESULTS

The incidence of ocular allergy over 18 months of treatment was 8.8% (9/102) in the fixed-combination group compared with 17.6% (18/102) in the brimonidine group (p=0.097). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis suggested that ocular allergy may be reduced or delayed in patients treated with the brimonidine-timolol fixed combination (p=0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

The brimonidine-timolol fixed combination was associated with a 50% lower incidence in ocular allergy compared with 0.2% brimonidine monotherapy. This difference between treatments was not statistically significant (p=0.097) but is likely to be clinically important. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the incidence of ocular allergy associated with brimonidine-timolol fixed combination treatment.

Allergic contact dermatitis from ophthalmics: 2007

We previously reviewed allergic contact dermatitis due to ophthalmic drugs and contact lens solutions. Since 1997, an additional 15 allergens have been reported. Here, we provide a review and discussion of these allergens.

Brimonidine

Brimonidine tartrate is a highly selective alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist indicated for the chronic treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Glaucoma, a serious worldwide public health problem causing blindness in 5.2 million people, is treated by drugs that lower the intraocular pressure (IOP), a primary risk factor in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Currently, beta-blockers are the most common therapy. In two 12-month clinical comparison trials with timolol 0.5% (n = 926), twice-daily brimonidine produced IOP lowering comparable to twice-daily timolol. In a 3-month trial with betaxolol 0.25% suspension (n = 206), twice-daily brimonidine was more effective in lowering IOP than twice-daily betaxolol. Brimonidine was well-tolerated ocularly and systemically in these trials. It caused no clinically significant mean changes in heart rate or blood pressure. Brimonidine produced no significant effect on FEV1 in clinical trials, and it is not contraindicated in patients with cardiopulmonary disease. Brimonidine 0.2% dosed twice daily has clinical utility as a first-line drug therapy. It is an effective and safe alternative to beta-blockers, particularly in patients at risk for pulmonary or cardiovascular disease. It decreases aqueous humour production and increases uveoscleral outflow, and has an additive ocular hypotensive effect used concomitantly with other agents. Brimonidine has demonstrated neuroprotective properties in laboratory animal studies. Additional studies are warranted to determine whether brimonidine has clinical benefit in protecting the optic nerve head from glaucomatous damage. Brimonidine is an important contribution to glaucoma management.

[Anterior uveitis and topical brimonidine: a case report]

We report the case of a 66-year-old patient treated for 13 months with brimonidine, who presented granulomatous anterior uveitis associated with an increase in intraocular pressure, allergic conjunctivitis and blepharitis in both eyes. No ocular or general cause for uveitis was found. The uveitis responded rapidly to cessation of brimonidine. This report illustrates that anterior uveitis can occur when brimonidine is used after approximately 1 year of treatment. Physicians must be informed of this side effect even though it is rare, with only four similar cases having been described in the literature.

Management of glaucoma: focus on pharmacological therapy

Glaucoma represents a major cause of vision loss throughout the world. Primary open-angle glaucoma, the most common form of glaucoma, is a chronic, progressive disease often, though not always, accompanied by elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). In this disorder, retinal ganglion cell loss and excavation of the optic nerve head produce characteristic peripheral visual field deficits. Patients with normal-tension glaucoma present with typical visual field and optic nerve head changes, without a documented history of elevated IOP. A variety of secondary causes, such as pigment dispersion syndrome and ocular trauma, can result in glaucoma as well. Treatment of all forms of glaucoma consists of reducing IOP. With proper treatment, progression of this disease can often be delayed or prevented. Treatment options for glaucoma include medications, laser therapy and incisional surgery. Laser techniques for the reduction of IOP include argon laser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty. Both techniques work by increasing outflow of aqueous humour through the trabecular meshwork. Surgical options for glaucoma treatment include trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage tube implantation and ciliary body cyclodestruction. While each of these types of procedures is effective at lowering IOP, therapy usually begins with medications. Medications lower IOP either by reducing the production or by increasing the rate of outflow of aqueous humour within the eye. Currently, there are five major classes of drugs used for the treatment of glaucoma: (i) cholinergics (acetylcholine receptor agonists); (ii) adrenoceptor agonists; (iii) carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs); (iv) beta-adrenoceptor antagonists; and (v) prostaglandin analogues (PGAs). Treatment typically begins with the selection of an agent for IOP reduction. Although beta-adrenoceptor antagonists are still commonly used by many clinicians, the PGAs are playing an increasingly important role in the first-line therapy of glaucoma. Adjunctive agents, such as alpha-adrenoceptor agonists and CAIs are often effective at providing additional reduction in IOP for patients not controlled on monotherapy. As with any chronic disease, effective treatment depends on minimising the adverse effects of therapy and maximising patient compliance. The introduction of a variety of well tolerated and potent medications over the past few years now allows the clinician to choose a treatment regimen on an individual patient basis and thereby treat this disorder more effectively.

Changing paradigms in the medical treatment of glaucoma

Glaucoma is defined by a typical optic neuropathy accompanied by characteristic visual field loss and eventual blindness. The major risk factor for glaucoma is elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Lowering IOP is currently the only proven method for reducing the risk of glaucomatous visual field loss and remains the primary goal of therapy. With the recent introduction of many new medications that lower IOP, the definition of what constitutes maximum tolerated medical therapy has been changing. The treatment can now be tailored better to each individual patient. The regimen needs to be affordable, easy to understand, and least interfering with the patient's quality of life. beta-blockers still are the mainstay of initial therapy, but more and more prostaglandin analogs and also alpha-2 agonists are being used initially. Systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and cholinergics are being used less frequently.

Short- and long-term safety of glaucoma drugs

Glaucoma, a leading cause of blindness worldwide, is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder. Patients with glaucoma may require long-term administration of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications. These medications belong to several classes of molecules including beta-adrenergic blockers, cholinergic agents, alpha-adrenergic agonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and ocular hypotensive lipids. Most adverse effects associated with IOP-lowering medications are mild and ocular in nature; however, several of them are associated with systemic risks as well as serious ocular effects, especially following chronic use. The following review discusses the acute and long-term effects of commonly used IOP-lowering medications.

Allergic reactions to brimonidine in patients treated for glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Allergic reactions to ophthalmic drugs have not been studied extensively in ophthalmology. We performed a study to estimate the incidence of allergy to brimonidine in patients treated for glaucoma.

METHODS

We identified all patients in a private glaucoma practice who started therapy with brimonidine between Mar. 19, 1998, and Aug. 14, 1999. We recorded the patient's diagnosis, age, sex, concomitant glaucoma medication, previous allergy to glaucoma medication and allergy to brimonidine. Allergy was defined as allergic contact dermatoconjunctivitis or follicular conjunctivitis.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients identified, 36 (25.7%) had had an allergic reaction to brimonidine. Contact dermatoconjunctivitis was noted in 19 patients (52.8%) and follicular conjunctivitis in 18 (50.0%). The rate of development of those two manifestations was linear and almost parallel throughout the study period. In logistic regression analysis previous allergy to a topically given antiglaucoma medication (t = -5.13) and concurrent use of levobunolol (t = 3.46) were retained as the most probable predictor variables of allergy to brimonidine. Life-table analysis showed a fairly linear curve, with no peak in allergy rate. Allergic reactions occurred throughout the year, with a small peak in March.

INTERPRETATION

We found a rate of allergy to brimonidine of 25.7%. Concomitant levobunolol use and allergy to another glaucoma medication were associated with a higher allergy rate.

Anterior uveitis as a side effect of topical brimonidine

PURPOSE

To report anterior uveitis as a late side-effect of topical brimonidine tartrate 0.2% (Alphagan; Allergan Inc., Irvine, California).

METHODS

Four patients aged 79 to 91 (mean, 83) years, who developed acute anterior uveitis while using topical brimonidine for chronic glaucoma, were clinically evaluated for causes of uveitis. When the inflammation had completely cleared, topical brimonidine was recommenced in one eye only to determine causality.

RESULTS

All four patients developed acute granulomatous anterior uveitis, which resolved rapidly on stopping brimonidine and receiving treatment with topical corticosteroids. The uveitis occurred 11 to 15 (mean, 13.8) months after commencement of brimonidine 0.2% twice daily. None of the patients had a previous history of uveitis, and no other identifiable cause of uveitis was found. In all patients, on rechallenge with brimonidine instilled twice daily to one eye, uveitis recurred within 3 weeks in that eye only.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that brimonidine can cause anterior uveitis as a late side effect. The inflammation settles rapidly on stopping the medication and on using topical corticosteroids and recurs on rechallenge with brimonidine.

Pharmaceutical management of the childhood glaucomas

Glaucoma in childhood is a diverse, blinding group of conditions, which presents a major therapeutic challenge. Treatment is primarily surgical with medical treatments used as an adjunct. None of these drugs has been granted approval by the regulatory agencies for use in children, but they are used on a compassionate basis. Issues of efficacy and safety of these medications in children are discussed. beta-adrenoceptor blockers have been employed as first line pharmaceutical therapy for many years. Recently three new classes of drugs have been developed for use in glaucoma in adults. beta-blockers remain first line therapy if there are no contraindications such as asthma. Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAI) appear to be less effective than beta-blockers, but seem safe systemically, although associated with local irritation. They are useful as an adjunct to beta-blockers or as first line therapy when beta-blockers are contraindicated. Prostaglandins have not proved as effective in childhood glaucoma as in adult glaucoma, although it works well in some patients with juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG) and others with aphakic glaucoma. alpha-adrenergic agonists, although effective at least in the short-term, have serious, potential systemic side effects, which demand close observation when used in neonates and young infants.

Pharmacological therapy for glaucoma: a review

For some time the medical treatment of glaucoma has consisted of topical beta-blockers, adrenergic agents, miotics and oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs). However, the therapeutic arsenal available for the medical treatment of glaucoma has recently extended with new classes of ocular hypotensive agents i.e. prostaglandins, local CAIs and alpha2-adrenergic agents. Beta-blockers are still the mainstay in glaucoma treatment and are first line drugs. However, even if they are applied once daily, as with timolol in gel forming solution and levobunolol, the possible cardiopulmonary adverse effects of beta-blockers remain a cause for concern. When monotherapy with beta-blockers is ineffective in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) or is hampered by adverse effects, a change of monotherapy to prostaglandins, local CAIs, alpha2-adrenergic agonists (brimonidine) or to dipivalyl epinephrine is advised. Prostaglandins, local CAIs and alpha2-adrenergic agonists, such as brimonidine, may in time become first line drugs because they reduce IOP effectively and until now systemic adverse effects have rarely been reported with these agents. The development of a pro-drug of either a local CAI or an alpha2-adrenergic agonist with a sustained and continuous effect on IOP level, which could be applied once a day is suggested. Because of these new developments, miotics, i.e. pilocarpine and carbachol, are recommended as second or third line drugs. The cholinesterase inhibitors are considered third line drugs as better agents with fewer local and systemic adverse effects have become available. Oral CAIs may be used temporarily in patients with elevated IOPs e.g. postsurgery or post-laser, or continuously in patients with glaucoma resistant to other treatment. Combining ocular hypotensive drugs is indicated when the target pressure for an individual patient cannot be reached with monotherapy. Combination therapy of beta-blockers is additive with prostaglandins, topical CAIs and miotics. Prostaglandins such as latanoprost can be combined with beta-blockers, adrenergic agents, local CAIs and miotics. Combinations with brimonidine or local CAIs need further investigation. Treatment of glaucoma with the new ocular hypotensive agents, either in monotherapy or combination therapy, may provide lower IOPs and delay or postpone the need for surgery.