To teach is to learn twice. Resident teachers learn more

A Virtual Multi-institution Pediatric Radiology Peer Teaching Conference Improves Knowledge of Educators

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Medical education led by peers and near-peers has been shown to benefit both teachers and learners and can be successfully incorporated into radiology education. The authors created a virtual, multi-institution pediatric radiology conference employing peer and near-peer teaching with the goals of improving radiology knowledge and enhancing the educational experience of radiology trainees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two radiology residency programs implemented a common pediatric radiology curriculum and joint quarterly virtual peer teaching conference. Conferences featured short teaching sessions led by six to ten radiology trainees and were facilitated by attending pediatric radiologists. Knowledge assessments (KA) consisting of multiple-choice questions inspired by conference learning objectives were sent to peer educators before the conference (pre-conference), directly after the conference (immediate post-conference), and three months after the conference (delayed post-conference). Surveys were distributed to peer educators immediately after conferences to assess conference reception and solicit feedback. Quantitative data was analyzed using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and post-hoc Tukey HSD test.

RESULTS

Four conferences featured 33 peer educators consisting primarily of first-year (60.6 %), second-year (18.2 %), and third-year (15.2 %) radiology residents. Compared to pre-conference scores, immediate post-conference scores were significantly increased (HSD 13, p = 0.02) and delayed post-conference scores were increased without statistical significance (HSD 5.8, p = 0.29). Almost all survey respondents perceived the conferences as helpful, well-organized, and effective in teaching pediatric radiology. A majority of participants expressed interest in participating in future peer teaching radiology conferences.

CONCLUSION

A virtual pediatric radiology peer and near-peer teaching conference held between two radiology residencies improved short-term radiology knowledge of educators and was highly received.

To teach is to learn twice, revisited: a qualitative study of how residents learn through teaching in clinical environments

BACKGROUND

Teaching helps the teacher's own learning as a professional-as the saying goes, 'to teach is to learn twice'. Near-peer teaching in clinical practice has been shown to contribute to the development of both teaching skills and necessary competencies for doctors. Research on how near-peer teachers learn through their teaching roles has mainly focused on classroom learning. However, understanding how the phenomenon of 'teaching is learning twice' occurs in clinical settings and its influencing factors is important for the development of a quality workplace learning environment. Therefore, this study investigated how residents learn through teaching in clinical practice and the factors influencing this process.

METHODS

This study's methodology is based on the constructivist grounded theory from a social constructivist perspective. Several teaching hospitals in Japan were included, and the study participants were post-graduate year 2 residents (PGY2s) from these hospitals. The interviews were recorded, transcribed into text, and analysed by the first author.

RESULTS

From January 2016 to July 2022, 13 interviews were conducted with 11 PGY2s from nine educational hospitals. The PGY2s played diverse educational roles in clinical settings and learned competencies as physicians in almost all areas through such roles. We found that knowledge transfer and serving as role models stimulated PGY2s' intrinsic motivation, encouraged reflection on their own experiences, and promoted self-regulated learning. Further, educating about procedural skills and clinical reasoning prompted reflection on their own procedural skills and thought processes. Supporting post-graduate year 1 residents' reflections led to the refinement of PGY2s' knowledge and thought processes through the verbal expression of their learning experiences. Such processes required the formation of a community of practice. Thus, education promoted learning through reflection and clarified the expert images of themselves that PGY2s envisaged.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that residents acquire various physician competencies through multiple processes by teaching as near-peer teachers in clinical settings, that a community of practice must be formed for near-peer teaching to occur in a clinical setting, and that teaching brings learning to those who teach by promoting reflection and helping them envision the professionals they aim to be.

5 Slides in 5 Minutes: Incorporating CanMEDS Competencies on Acute Care Surgery

BACKGROUND

The University of British Columbia (UBC) Division of General Surgery developed an initiative entitled "5-in-5s" to improve educational opportunities on the Acute Care Surgery (ACS) service. We examined whether 5-in-5s are felt to be a valuable teaching tool, and evaluated their ability to incorporate CanMEDS competencies within the General Surgery program.

METHODS

A web-based survey was distributed to all general surgery trainees and staff on ACS that have participated in 5-in-5s.

RESULTS

A total of 37 responses were collected (62% response rate). All respondents felt 5-in-5s were valuable overall. Four of the seven CanMEDS competencies were evaluated. About 100% felt their knowledge was positively impacted by presenting, and 80% by attending alone. About 71% of respondents agreed that 5-in5s provided opportunities for health advocacy, 50% for collaboration, and 36% for leadership.

CONCLUSION

We identified 5-in-5s as a valuable teaching method and a novel approach to integrate CanMEDS competencies into ACS training.

The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Residents Perspectives on Learning to Teach Over 7 Years

Despite increasing emphasis on the development and implementation of Residents-as-Teachers programs, resident perspectives on their roles as teachers have rarely been explored. This paper explores trends across 7 years of data collected from resident leaders across North American orthopaedic residency programs.

Methods

Data were collected during the American Orthopaedic Association's resident-only engagement activity known as the C. McCollister Evarts Resident Leadership Forum (RLF). A total of 997 of 1,050 RLF participants responded from 2015 to 2021.

Results

Residents perceived themselves as having a strong influence on medical students' education more so than any other teacher. However, less than one third are provided with any formal instruction from their institutions to support their teaching, and nearly 3 quarters of participants felt there was room for improvement in their teaching effectiveness. For the most part, resident perspectives have stayed relatively consistent over time.

Discussion

Residents are keen and willing to invest time into developing their teaching effectiveness. There may be a need for improved advocacy to program directors to increase the presence and availability of formal Residents-as-Teachers programs to support residents in their roles as teachers. We offer suggestions for the composition of such programs for consideration.

Resident Physicians as Clinical Educators in Anesthesiology: A Narrative Review

The importance of resident physicians as clinical educators is widely acknowledged in many clinical specialties and by national accreditation organizations for medical education. Within anesthesiology training programs, there is growing attention to the role of trainees as clinical educators. This narrative review describes the theoretical and demonstrated benefits of clinical teaching by residents in anesthesiology and other medical fields, summarizes current efforts to support and promote residents as educators, and suggests ways in which anesthesiology training programs can further assess and develop the role of residents as clinical educators.

Lessons From a Near-Peer Junior Doctor Teaching Program in Trauma and Orthopedics

INTRODUCTION

 A junior doctor teaching program delivered by near-peers can foster collaboration in a less-pressured and conducive learning environment. The aim of this study was to provide an analysis of an orthopedic teaching program in a high-resource environment utilizing readily available tools and resources that are potentially available in most hospitals globally.  Methods: This study involved the utilization of an outcome-based learning approach with regular formal feedback. An anonymized Google Forms survey using a 10-point Likert scale was conducted after a 30-week period. The survey tool was sent out to 28 doctors and two senior nurse practitioners who participated in the program either as tutors, learners, or both. A total of 19 out of 30 respondents completed the survey giving a 63% survey completion rate. The setting for this study was the trauma and orthopedics department in a United Kingdom district general hospital.

RESULTS

 Learners' confidence in their orthopedic knowledge and skills pre-program had a median response of eight with a mode of seven whereas confidence following engagement on the program improved with a median response of nine and a mode of 10. At an alpha level of 0.05, this observed improvement was statistically significant using the Mann-Whitney U test (p=0.466). Tutors' perception of the usefulness of the teaching feedback had a median response of nine with a mode of 10. Relevance of the selected topics had a median response of nine and a mode of 10. Inclusion in the teaching program to cater to learner diversity had a median response of nine and a mode of 10. The effectiveness of a blended approach for learning had a median response of nine and a mode of 10.  Conclusion: This study has provided evidence of the benefits of a near-peer teaching program. This is especially important in the post-coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic recovery period where easily accessible and well-grounded educational programs will be useful to complement the deanery teachings for trainees. This is important as this may be the main source of formal teaching for non-trainee junior doctors in many hospital settings. Additional research will be needed to further explore the pros and cons of such programs within a surgical specialty like orthopedics with an emphasis on the various pedagogical approaches to teaching and learning for junior doctors working in a busy clinical setting.

Teaching Medical Students to Teach: A Narrative Review and Literature-Informed Recommendations for Student-as-Teacher Curricula

PURPOSE

Medical students play an important role as teachers. This narrative review synthesizes the student-as-teacher (SaT) literature that incorporates formal teaching skills training, with the goal of proposing literature-informed recommendations for SaT curriculum development within the context of competency-based medical education.

METHOD

In January and August 2020, the authors searched Medline and Embase and conducted forward citation searches in Scopus to identify articles from 1985 to 2020 related to teaching medical students to teach. Search terms included "student(s) as teacher(s)," "near-peer teaching," and "teaching to teach." The findings from selected articles were summarized and synthesized.

RESULTS

Forty-three articles met the inclusion criteria: 33 papers describing specific SaT curricula, 3 literature reviews, 6 stakeholder surveys, and 1 Delphi study. While students often engage in teaching roles, formal teaching skills training is not always provided. Existing curricula are usually optional, delivered as short courses, and offered to senior students. Course content commonly includes topics related to planning and delivering learning activities and providing feedback. Of the numerous teaching modalities employed, students indicate a preference for interactive and experiential learning. Methods used to assess students' teaching skills vary; however, direct observation and feedback are valued assessment methods. Program evaluations have shown positive outcomes, including high student satisfaction and enhanced self-confidence as teachers.

CONCLUSIONS

Informed by these findings and outcome-based educational frameworks, the authors suggest 4 guiding principles for SaT curricula: (1) teaching skills training should be formally implemented in undergraduate medical education and should, whenever possible, be compulsory; (2) teaching skills should be taught longitudinally and progressively along the undergraduate to postgraduate continuum; (3) curriculum content should be aligned with a school's preexisting curriculum and local context; and (4) authentic opportunities for students to engage in teaching roles should be included. They also propose recommendations for curriculum content, teaching modalities, and assessment methods.

Residents as teachers in Neurology: a Germany-wide survey on the involvement of neurological residents in clinical teaching

Background

Residents play an important role in the clinical training of medical students, spending up to 25% of their daily work teaching. In the US medical curriculum didactic courses for residents already exist and their role as a teacher is firmly anchored. In Germany, there are no fixed regulations or residents-as-teachers-programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activities of neurological residents in clinical teaching.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cross-sectional online survey among neurological residents in Germany. The evaluation was carried out descriptively and by means of text analysis.

Results

138 residents from 39 German neurological university hospitals answered the survey. Nearly half of them needed the teaching activity as part of their career planning. The residents are mostly involved in practical courses. More than 80% stated, that they enjoy teaching. 64% stated that there were no preparatory courses for teaching at their hospital/university. 78.4% of the respondents received no or merely insufficient feedback for their own teaching and 62.5% had only little or even no knowledge about the university curriculum.

Conclusions

By teaching medical students, residents play an outstanding role in recruiting students for neurology and, simultaneously, teaching leads an improvement in the residents’ own learning. To encourage young neurologists as teachers and—at the same time as learners—Clinic directors and universities should promote residents-as-teachers programs in neurology and reward the residents’ teaching activities.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42466-022-00170-3.

Residents-as-Teachers Curriculum for Radiation Oncology: A Targeted Needs Assessment

PURPOSE

Achieving competency as educators is increasingly recognized as a critical part of residents' training in graduate medical education across specialties. In addition to teaching medical students, radiation oncology residents often play a vital role in peer and interprofessional education. We conducted a survey to identify the needs of radiation oncology residents for developing skills in teaching.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An anonymous, web-based survey was developed and distributed to resident physicians at US radiation oncology programs. Analyses describe respondent demographics, experiences with teaching, and interest in various aspects of a formal "residents-as-teachers" curriculum.

RESULTS

There were 171 completed survey responses (27.5% response rate). A total of 146 residents (85.4%) reported receiving no formal training in teaching before residency, and 121 (70.8%) reported no formal training during residency. Residents who had formal training in teaching were significantly more likely to be "quite" or "extremely" confident about teaching compared with residents who had no prior formal training (76.0% vs 51.4%; P = .022). Residents most commonly taught other residents and medical students (163 [95.3%] and 160 [93.6%] respondents, respectively). The most common settings for teaching were one-on-one teaching (164 respondents [95.9%]), small-group lectures (135 respondents [78.9%]), and intradepartmental lectures (136 respondents [79.5%]). In response to open-ended questions regarding desired teaching opportunities and domains for teaching development, many residents expressed a lack of confidence in teaching and were interested in improvement across many aspects of teaching.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation oncology residents are expected and desire to teach in a multitude of settings across a wide variety of audiences. However, a significant proportion of radiation oncology residents lack formal training and rarely receive feedback for their teaching skills. The results of this national survey support the development of a residents-as-teachers curriculum for radiation oncology residents that would address the needs for and significant interest in this area.

A qualitative study of the perceived value of participation in a new Department of Surgery Research Residents as teachers program

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand the perspectives of surgical residents who completed a Research Residents as Teachers Program (RRATP).

METHODS

Our RRATP included a 6 h workshop followed by formal teaching opportunities across one academic year. Resident teachers participated in semi-structured interviews, which were inductively analyzed for prominent themes.

RESULTS

Eight surgical research residents completed the RRATP workshop and taught 330 h (median = 26 h, range: 8-105). Interview participation rate was 100%; kappa was 0.81. Residents reported four themes: 1) increased knowledge of teaching principles with subsequent teaching changes, specific factors that contributed to their development as a teacher, numerous personal benefits to participation, and broad positive consequences for the surgical department including improved culture and patient care.

CONCLUSION

A RRATP can generate a significant number of formal teaching hours by surgical research residents, who perceive a high value of formal education training to themselves and their surgical residency program.

A Multi-faceted Educational Approach for Pain Metric Recording Prior to Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: Effects on Documentation by an Acute Pain Service

Background

Despite the increased use of electronic medical records (EMRs) in past years, the recording of clinically useful baseline pain information may still be lacking. An educational effort targeted at the acute pain service and reinforced by electronic prompting may be an effective way to promote electronic documentation of relevant pain metrics. The objective of this study was to assess whether an educational effort with electronic prompting in the EMR promotes the documentation of baseline pain scores and preoperative opioid use by an acute pain service (APS).

Methods

A total of 98 patients were included in this study: 49 in the study group and 49 in the control group. The study group consisted of patients who underwent knee and hip arthroplasties after the institution of a multimodal analgesia educational program that also incorporated an electronic prompt to promote behavior change. Primary outcomes were the frequency of documentation of baseline pain scores and preoperative opioid use.

Results

After the implementation of the education initiative, 67% of the patients had baseline pain scores recorded in the preoperative APS documentation, compared to 20% in the control group (p = 0.0001). Preoperative opioid use was recorded in 24% of APS documentation within the control group, but this increased to 73% after the educational intervention (p = 0.0001). Documentation of resting pain scores on the day of surgery also increased from 59% to 87% (p = 0.0014).

Conclusions

The introduction of a multi-dimensional educational effort focused on baseline pain metric recording within the context of an analgesic change of practice increased assessment of both baseline pain and preoperative opioid use by APS. These results can be applied to other settings in which a focused change of practice is required and an electronic medical record already utilized.

Teaching skills for medical residents: are these important? A narrative review of the literature

BACKGROUND

There is extensive evidence, mainly from the United States and Canada, that points towards the need to train medical residents in teaching skills. Much of the "informal curriculum", including professional values, is taught by residents when consultants are not around. Furthermore, data from the 1960s show the importance of acquiring these skills, not only for residents but also for all doctors. -Teaching moments can be identified in simple daily situations, like discussing a clinical situation with patients and their families, planning patients' care with the healthcare team or teaching peers and medical students. The aim here was to examine the significance of resident teaching courses and estimate the effectiveness of these courses and the state of the art in Brazil.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the literature, using the MEDLINE, PubMed, SciELO and LILACS databases to extract relevant articles describing residents-as-teachers (RaT) programs and the importance of teaching skills for medical residents. This review formed part of the development of a doctoral project on medical education.

RESULTS

Original articles, reviews and systematic reviews were used to produce this paper as part of a doctoral project.

CONCLUSIONS

RaT programs are important in clinical practice and as role models for junior learners. -Moreover, these educational programs improve residents' self-assessed teaching behaviors and teaching confidence. On the other hand, RaT program curricula are limited by both the number of studies and their methodologies. In Brazil, there is no such experience, according to the data gathered here, except for one master's thesis.

A national needs assessment of emergency medicine resident-as-teacher curricula

Both the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education require residents to be engaged in teaching to develop skills as educators. Although proposed guidelines for an emergency medicine (EM) resident-as-teachers (RAT) curriculum were published in 2006, little has been published regarding RAT curriculum implementation or outcomes since. A crucial first step in developing a formal RAT curriculum for EM educators to pilot, implement, and evaluate is an assessment of current needs and practices related to RAT curricula in EM residencies. The aim of this study was to conduct a needs assessment of EM residency programs regarding RAT curricular resources and practices. We invited all EM residency programs to participate in a web-based survey assessing their current RAT curricula and needs. 28 % responded to our needs assessment. Amongst responding programs, 60 % had a RAT curriculum. Of programs with a required medical student rotation, 59 % had a RAT curriculum. Of programs without a RAT program, 14 % had a program in development, and 18 % had a teaching resident program without a curriculum. Most RAT programs (72 %) were lecture-based and the majority (66 %) evaluated using survey data. 84 % of respondent programs demonstrated a desire for a national RAT curriculum. We find that despite national mandates, a large portion of programs do not have a RAT curriculum in place. There is wide variation in core content and curriculum evaluation techniques among available curricula. A majority of respondents report interest in a standardized web-based curriculum as one potential solution to this problem. Our results may help inform collaborative efforts to develop a national EM RAT curriculum.

Are Australian medical students being taught to teach?

BACKGROUND

The current global trend of growth in medical training is increasing the demand for the teaching and supervision of medical students and junior doctors. If well trained and supported, junior doctors and medical students represent an important teaching resource. Unfortunately, there is limited evidence available on whether Australian medical students are equipped with teaching skills. This study aimed to gain insight into the type and amount of teaching-skills training and peer-to-peer teaching present in Australian medical schools.

METHODS

A survey of Australian medical schools was conducted between May and December 2014. An online 22-item questionnaire was sent to all 19 Australian medical schools.

RESULTS

The response rate to the questionnaire was 100 per cent. Eleven Australian medical schools reported offering a teaching-skills programme, of which five were described as compulsory formal programmes. Eight schools did not offer such a programme, citing time restraints and other subjects taking higher priority. Formal peer-to-peer teaching opportunities were described by 17 schools, with 13 offering this electively. Two schools reported that they did not offer such opportunities because of time restraints, the belief that the quality of expert teaching is superior and because of a lack of staffing. The demand for the teaching and supervision of medical students and junior doctors is increasing CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing number of medical students and subsequently junior doctors in Australia, a minority of Australian medical schools report including a formal, compulsory teaching-skills programme. These results may imply a lost opportunity to use the positive effects of teaching-skills programmes, and are in line with studies from other countries.

Peer-assisted learning for foundation doctors

BACKGROUND

Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is a widely accepted learner-led educational model encouraging cooperative active learning. Whereas attention has historically focussed on the use of PAL in undergraduate contexts, less is known about the benefits and challenges of using PAL for postgraduate clinical trainees. This study describes the implementation and evaluation of a PAL scheme for UK foundation-year trainees (newly qualified doctors).

METHODS

Following a needs assessment, a peer-led component was introduced into the weekly foundation teaching programme at the hospital. Each week a peer tutor presented a topic relevant to the foundation curriculum, and peer participants provided written feedback. Questionnaire-based evaluation of the scheme was conducted 7 months after implementation.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight per cent of trainees completed the evaluation. Eighty-eight per cent were satisfied with the PAL scheme. Crucially, PAL was seen to address historic barriers to effective learning. Educational content seemed to be better matched to the learning needs and experience of learners, with particular value placed on case-based peer discussions. Furthermore, PAL seemed to promote a learning environment in which questions and conjectures could be safely shared. Although some peer tutors found presenting to peers anxiety-provoking, the majority agreed that PAL not only helped develop their teaching ability but also positively impacted on their everyday clinical work. Less is known about the benefits and challenges of using PAL for postgraduate clinical trainees DISCUSSION: The PAL scheme was well received by participants and supports its use outside of its traditional undergraduate focus. Trainees identified a number of pedagogical benefits through serving as both tutor and tutee. Delivering teaching skills and feedback skills training were identified as future developments to further maximise the educational benefits of PAL.

Residents as teachers: Near peer learning in clinical work settings: AMEE Guide No. 106

This AMEE Guide provides a framework to guide medical educators engaged in the design and implementation of "Resident as Teacher" programs. The suggested approaches are based on established models of program development: the Program Logic model to guide program design, the Dundee three-circle model to inform a systematic approach to planning educational content and the Kirkpatrick pyramid, which forms the backbone of program evaluation. The Guide provides an overview of Resident as Teacher curricula, their benefits and impact, from existing literature supplemented by insights from the authors' own experiences, all of whom are engaged in teaching initiatives at their own institutions. A conceptual description of the Program Logic model is provided, a model that highlights an outcomes-based curricular design. Examples of activities under each step of this model are described, which would allow educational leaders to structure their own program based on the scope, context, institutional needs and resources available. Emphasis is placed on a modular curricular format to not only enhance the teaching skills of residents, but also enable development of future career educators, scholars and leaders. Application of the Dundee three-circle model is illustrated to allow for a flexible curricular design that can cater to varying levels of educational needs and interests. In addition, practical advice is provided on robust assessment of outcomes, both assessment of participants and program evaluation. Finally, the authors highlight the need for congruence between the formal and hidden curriculum through explicit recognition of the value of teaching by institutions, support for development of teaching programs, encouragement of evidence-based approach to education and rewards for all levels of teachers.

A peer-designed selective in anesthesiology, critical care, and perioperative medicine for first- and second-year medical students

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to design and implement a preclinical elective (termed selective) in anesthesiology, critical care, and perioperative medicine and to report survey results assessing the impact of the selective on first- and second-year medical students' understanding of basic concepts, comfort with procedural skills, and interest in the specialty.

DESIGN

Preinvention and postintervention survey evaluation was used as the design of this study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants in this study are first- and second-year medical students.

INTERVENTIONS

A 1-week introductory anesthesiology curriculum was developed to include didactic sessions, shadowing experiences, lunch and dinner panels, mentorship and networking opportunities, and procedural workshops in airway management, ultrasound, and vascular access techniques.

MEASUREMENTS

Preselective and postselective surveys using a 10-point scale (1, strongly disagree; 10, strongly agree) were administered 1 week before and after the selective.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 8 students participated in the selective, with a 100% survey response rate. Students reported significant increases for all survey questions regarding basic concepts and skills. The largest increases were reported in comfort with airway management skills, understanding of the perioperative surgical home model, and vascular access skills. All participants indicated a higher likelihood of pursuing anesthesiology as a career and attributed their increased interest in anesthesiology to the selective.

CONCLUSIONS

This new selective was successful in giving first- and second-year medical students a comprehensive overview of anesthesiology and increasing medical student interest in the specialty. The success of this selective leads to promising belief that similar peer-designed educational experiences can be developed at other medical schools to improve education and interest in this area of medicine.

Survey of Residents' Attitudes and Awareness Toward Teaching and Student Feedback

BACKGROUND

Teaching medical students is an important component of residency; however, little is known about student feedback regarding resident teaching skills.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to explore resident awareness of medical student feedback mechanisms and how feedback is obtained, and also identified attitudes about teaching more commonly found in residents who seek feedback.

METHODS

We surveyed all resident physicians at a university-affiliated academic health center about awareness of student feedback regarding their teaching abilities, and their attitudes related to teaching that may impact whether residents seek feedback.

RESULTS

Of 605 residents, 335 (55%) responded, with 72% (242 of 335) noting they did not formally review student feedback of their teaching with their advisor during regularly scheduled meetings, 42% (140 of 332) reporting they did not know of any formal feedback mechanisms, and 28.4% (95 of 334) reporting they had not received feedback from students in any format. Although only a quarter of residents solicit feedback always or often, more than half would like feedback always or often. Reported barriers to feedback included student apprehension, time constraints, and lack of a formal system. A majority of residents had positive attitudes toward teaching and felt that student feedback would help teaching ability and medical proficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

A large percentage of residents at 1 teaching institution reported not receiving feedback from students on their teaching abilities. Residents who did receive feedback were more likely to have actively solicited it. Overall, residents believe that this feedback from students would benefit their clinical and teaching performance.

Peer observation and feedback of resident teaching

BACKGROUND

Resident doctors (residents) play a significant role in the education of medical students. Morning work rounds provide an optimal venue to assess resident teaching. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of peer observation of resident work rounds, to evaluate resident perceptions of peer observation and to evaluate resident perceptions of peer feedback.

METHODS

  Twenty-four internal medicine residents were simultaneously observed by an attending physician and a peer while teaching during work rounds (between August2008 and May 2009). At year-end, residents received a survey to characterise their attitudes towards peer observation and feedback.

RESULTS

Twenty-one residents (87.5%) completed the survey. Half (52.4%) felt that participating in the peer observation study stimulated their interest in teaching during work rounds. Prior to participation in the study, fewer than half (42.9%) felt comfortable being observed by their peers, compared with 71.4 percent after participation (p=0.02). The proportion of residents who felt comfortable giving feedback to peers increased from 26.3 to 65.0percent (p=0.004), and the proportion of residents who felt comfortable receiving feedback from peers increased from 76.2 to 95.2 percent (p=0.02).

DISCUSSION

Peer observation and feedback of resident teaching during work rounds is feasible and rewarding for the residents involved. Comfort with regards to being observed by peers, with receiving feedback from peers and with giving feedback to peers significantly increased after the study. Most residents reported changes in their teaching behaviour resulting from feedback. Residents felt that observing a peer teach on work rounds was one of the most useful activities to improve their own teaching on work rounds.

Anesthesiology Residents-as-Teachers Program: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The role of residents as teachers has grown over time. Programs have been established within various specialties to formally develop these skills. Anesthesiology residents are frequently asked to provide supervision for novice learners and have numerous opportunities for teaching skills and clinical decision making. Yet, there are no educational programs described in the literature to train anesthesiology residents to teach novice learners.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether a resident-as-teacher program would increase anesthesiology residents' self-reported teaching skills.

METHODS

An 8-session interactive Anesthesiology Residents-as-Teachers (ART) Program was developed to emphasize 6 key teaching skills. During a 2-year period, 14 anesthesiology residents attended the ART program. The primary outcome measure was resident self-assessment of their teaching skills across 14 teaching domains, before and 6 months after the ART program. Residents also evaluated the workshops for quality with a 9-item, postworkshop survey. Paired t testing was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Resident self-assessment led to a mean increase in teaching skills of 1.04 in a 5-point Likert scale (P < .001). Residents reported the greatest improvement in writing/using teaching objectives (+1.29, P < .001), teaching at the bedside (+1.57, P  =  .002), and leading case discussions (+1.64, P  =  .001). Residents rated the workshops 4.2 out of 5 (3.9-4.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents rated their teaching skills as significantly improved in 13 of 14 teaching domains after participation in the ART program. The educational program required few resources and was rated highly by residents.

Feedback based on observation of work rounds improves residents' self-reported teaching skills

INTRODUCTION

Residents provide a significant amount of bedside teaching to medical students and more junior colleagues, but often do not receive feedback that is tailored to this aspect of their professional performance.

OBJECTIVE

To assess residents' self-reported improvement in teaching skills after feedback based on direct observation of work rounds.

METHOD

The authors initiated a program of direct observation of residents' teaching during work rounds during the academic year 2007-2008. Eleven interested faculty volunteers, including chief residents, observed teaching on work rounds by 18 second-year residents in internal medicine during 35 total encounters. Within 24 hours, the faculty observers provided individualized feedback to the resident teachers regarding the quantity and quality of their teaching based on the data collected with the Teaching on Work Rounds observation form. At the end of the year, a survey was conducted to assess the residents' receptivity to this program.

RESULTS

Each observation averaged 92 minutes per observer, for 81.5 recorded hours of observations. Eighty percent of the residents felt that they were better teachers because of the feedback they received, and 87% subsequently reported having made conscious changes in their teaching during work rounds.

DISCUSSION

A direct observation program of residents' teaching on work rounds improved residents' interest in teaching while motivating them to make conscious changes in their teaching based on the individualized feedback they received.

A Pilot Study of a "Resident Educator And Life-long Learner" Program: Using a Faculty Train-the-Trainer Program

PURPOSE

We sought to create a resident educator program using a Train-the-Trainer (TTT) approach with adaptable curricula at a large tertiary health care center with a medical school and 60 accredited residency programs.

METHODS

The Resident Educator And Life-long Learner (REALL) Program was designed as a 3-phase model. Phase 1 included centralized planning and development that led to the design of 7 teaching modules and evaluation tools for TTT and resident sessions. Phase 2 entailed the dissemination of the TTT modules (Learning Styles, Observational Skills, Giving Feedback, Communication Skills: The Angry Patient, Case-Based Teaching, Clinical Reasoning, Effective Presentations) to faculty trainers. In phase 3, specific modules were chosen and customized by the faculty trainers, and implemented for their residents. Evaluations from residents and faculty were collected throughout this process.

RESULTS

A total of 45 faculty trainers representing 27 residency programs participated in the TTT program, and 97% of trainers were confident in their ability to implement sessions for their residents. A total of 20 trainers from 11 residency programs implemented 33 modules to train 479 residents, and 97% of residents believed they would be able to apply the skills learned. Residents' comments revealed appreciation of discussion of their roles as teachers.

CONCLUSION

Use of an internal TTT program can be a strategy for dissemination of resident educator and life-long learner curricula in a large academic tertiary care center. The TTT model may be useful to other large academic centers.

Senior pediatric residents as teachers for an innovative multidisciplinary mock code curriculum

BACKGROUND

Resuscitation education for pediatric residents may be limited due to the low frequency of actual codes in children. Mock codes represent an opportunity to increase trainee education in acute resuscitations, and we designed a unique multidisciplinary mock code curriculum that uses senior pediatric residents as teachers.

METHODS

A novel mock code curriculum was designed and integrated into an existing night-float rotation. Our 2-tiered curriculum not only focuses on improving teaching proficiency for resident educators (REs) but also includes separate goals to augment simulation-based resuscitation education for resident participants (RPs) and the multidisciplinary staff.

RESULTS

Seventy-six residents (17 REs, 59 RPs) and more than 75 nurses have participated in the curriculum. After participation, 100% of residents felt that this curriculum would improve the quality of actual resuscitations, and 94% of RPs reported receiving valuable feedback. Comfort with teaching and feedback increased for REs (P < .05), and comfort in resuscitation and crisis resource management improved for RPs (P < .05). The nursing staff also felt that communication, teamwork, and collaboration improved due to implementation of this curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

A unique mock code curriculum can improve resident comfort with teaching, peer facilitation, feedback, and resuscitation. Curricular interventions of this nature may also be able to improve the balance between service and education within a residency training program. As we move toward a competency based training model within graduate medical education, further investigation is needed to link educational modifications of this nature to clinical outcomes and actual resident performance.

Professional development is enhanced by serving as a mini-CEX preceptor

INTRODUCTION

The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) is widely used for the evaluation of medical trainees' clinical competence. To our knowledge, no study has examined the effect of mini-CEX on the preceptors. Based on the principle of "to teach is to learn twice," we hypothesized that the act of precepting a mini-CEX would enhance preceptors' own learning and performance.

METHODS

A 21-item questionnaire incorporating the 3 out of 4 levels of Kirkpatrick's model was completed by experienced mini-CEX preceptors. Data collected from the questionnaire included ratings of Kirkpatrick's level of "Reaction" (level 1) and "Behavior" (level 3) and the frequencies of relearning the clinical skills related to mini-CEX, which assessed Kirkpatrick's "Learning" (level 2).

RESULTS

A majority of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that precepting the mini-CEX both increased reflection on their own clinical practice and had a positive impact on their clinical skills. More than 80% of preceptors reported relearning one or more of the mini-CEX clinical skills. Experienced preceptors relearned the clinical skills more frequently than the less experienced preceptors. About one-third of respondents indicated that being a preceptor of mini-CEX increased both self-confidence and health care quality in their own clinical practice.

DISCUSSION

These findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting that participating as a preceptor in a mini-CEX has a positive impact on the preceptor's professional development. Further studies are needed, including analyzing mechanisms of mini-CEX on the clinical skills of preceptor, and assessing whether similar effects can be observed in other teaching hospitals in different cultural contexts.

How to teach evidence-based medicine to teachers: reflections from a workshop experience

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To summarize 20-year experience of conducting a workshop designed for educators who wish to improve their teaching skills of evidence based medicine (EBM). The goal is to provide tips for educators interested in replicating this educational model.

METHODS

Qualitative description of factors associated with the success of the workshop.

RESULTS

The factors considered by instructors to be most helpful are: the small group interactive design, role-play and simulation of real world learning environments, a mentorship model and high educator to learner ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this experience is observational and does not represent high quality evidence, certain attributes in the design of EBM workshops may lead to better dissemination of EBM concepts. Educators may consider empirically applying some of these attributes and testing their efficacy in comparative studies.

Improving teaching skills in obstetrics and gynecology residents: evaluation of a residents-as-teachers program

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if a residents-as-teachers program improves residents' teaching skills.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four residents (13 intervention, 11 controls) participated in a controlled trial of a residents-as-teachers program. The intervention group attended a 10.5-hour workshop-based program. Afterwards, both groups were tested with a 6-station Objective Structured Teaching Examination (OSTE), conducted by standardized students. Both groups also completed teaching skills self-assessment questionnaires. In addition, the intervention group completed evaluations of each workshop.

RESULTS

On the OSTE, the intervention group outscored the control group overall (mean: 74 vs 63, P =.001, 95% CI: 6-7 points) and on 4 out of 6 stations. Intervention residents increased their teaching self-assessment mean ratings from 3.5 to 4.0; residents gave the 6 workshops a mean rating of 4.49 (1-5 scale, 5 = best).

CONCLUSION

The residents-as-teachers program improved the teaching skills of residents. Their self-assessment of their teaching skills also improved. They rated the workshops highly.

A literature review of "resident-as-teacher" curricula: do teaching courses make a difference?

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evaluation methods of resident teaching courses and to estimate the effectiveness of these teaching courses.

DESIGN

We searched the literature from 1975 to May 2003 using the PubMed MESH terms internship and residency and teaching; 1,436 articles were identified and 77 contained information regarding teaching courses. Fourteen articles contained information regarding outcomes of resident teaching courses and were selected for intensive review.

MAIN RESULTS

Five uncontrolled pre-post studies used resident self-reported teaching skills/behaviors as outcome measures; all reported some improvement in self-reported skills. Three uncontrolled pre-post studies examined live or videotaped resident teaching encounters and all revealed improvement in some teaching skills. One uncontrolled trial and three nonrandomized controlled trials used learner evaluations of resident teaching behaviors as outcomes and all revealed an improvement in ratings of residents after course participation. Four randomized controlled trials of resident teaching curricula are included in this review. One study did not show any quantitative benefit of a resident teaching course on performance on an objective structured teaching evaluation. Two studies assessing resident teaching evaluations before and after course participation showed conflicting results. One study noted improvements in resident teaching skills assessed through videotape analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident teaching courses improve resident self-assessed teaching behaviors and teaching confidence. Teaching courses are linked to improved student evaluations. Further studies must be completed to elucidate the best format, length, timing, and content of resident teaching courses and to determine whether they have an effect on learner performance.

The in-house education of clinical clerks in surgery and the role of housestaff

BACKGROUND

While on surgical rotations, clinical clerks spend more time on the ward and in the emergency department than in any other location. Consequently, their in-house experience is of great importance to their education-yet the teaching processes in these settings have never been fully explored. Unlike the structured pre-clerkship years, the exact breakdown of a clerk's hospital-based education is difficult to elucidate. To effectively evaluate a clerkship curriculum, it is essential to know what clerks are being taught outside of seminars, how that teaching occurs, and by whom. This study proposes a methodology by which a surgical clerkship curriculum can be evaluated.

METHODS

For the purpose of the study, surgery clerks carried written and audio logs of their informal teaching encounters during one on-call period (30 hours). These included who taught them, where, by what methods, for how long, and what prompted the teaching. A survey of similar variables was administered to all clerks who rotated through general surgery over 4 months and to all general surgery residents.

RESULTS

Four clerks returned completed logs (100% response rate), and 17 clerks (85% response) and 15 residents (100% response) were surveyed. Audiotaped and written logs were similar, demonstrating good recall. Students recorded an average of 11 teaching encounters (range 3 to 20) per 30 hour period, lasting a total of 73 minutes (range 17 to 178) and each 6.7 +/- 14 minutes long. Both logs and surveys identified most teaching as unsolicited, done mostly by junior and chief residents, focused chiefly on diagnosis and using a Socratic style. Most teaching occurred in the operating room, yet its occurrence was unpredictable; in surveys the emergency room and clinic settings were perceived as more important. Staff surgeons contributed 27% of the logged encounters yet were perceived in surveys as the least contributors. Residents' and clerks' perceptions of teaching were similar except for residents overvaluing the amount of senior teaching (P = 0.04). The resident level correlated significantly with the comfort of teaching (r = 0.618, P = 0.04). Senior residents encouraged more problem-solving, whereas juniors favored minilectures. Only one resident had received formal teaching instruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Informal teaching of surgery clerks is variable and occurs through multiple short encounters in many settings and by various trainees. Efforts to improve the teaching process should focus on providing formal teaching instruction early in residency, specifically geared toward short encounters in flexible settings. Both the operating room as a learning environment and staff surgeons as informal teachers must be intentionally integrated into the teaching process.

Teaching on the run: teaching skills for surgical trainees

BACKGROUND

Increasing recognition of the need for training in teaching skills for clinical teachers has coincided with data that registrars and residents conduct much 'on the job' teaching as part of their routine work. While attention has been devoted to training consultants, support for the teaching role of the junior staff has been relatively neglected. The aim of the present report is to describe the teaching experiences of surgical registrars and the impact of a registrar teaching workshop.

METHOD

A half-day programme combining presentation and discussion of surgical teaching with practical skills sessions was designed for surgical registrars at Prince of Wales Hospital. The programme included observation and feedback of brief teaching simulations at the bedside of volunteer patients to newly commenced clinical students, and small group sessions on clinic and operating theatre teaching. A pre-workshop questionnaire sought information about the registrars' own teaching, and a survey 3 months after the workshop determined if any changes to teaching practice had occurred.

RESULTS

The registrars were generally moderately to very confident with their teaching ability but more than 75% felt that they were more confident after the workshop. Only three of 39 registrars had received any instruction aimed at improving their teaching skills, yet 34/39 had taught either on the ward, in the clinics or in the operating room. Follow-up after 3 months revealed that most registrars were enjoying their teaching tasks more, and half had increased their teaching since the workshop and began discussing teaching with their surgical colleagues.

CONCLUSIONS

The present project demonstrates that relatively brief interventions focused on skill development may enhance the confidence and enjoyment of junior clinical teachers and increase the frequency of 'teaching on the run'.