Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and Clostridium difficile toxin positivity

Single-center experience with perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infections in kidney transplant recipients

Background

Infections in kidney transplant recipients are particularly challenging owing to the immunosuppressive treatment, usually long history of chronic illness, comorbidities and prior exposures to antibiotics. Among the most common complications early after surgery are surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and evaluate epidemiological data regarding surgical site infections. Moreover, we were able to compare the current results with historical data from our institution when different perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was practiced.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective case–control study in a group of 254 deceased donor renal graft recipients transplanted in a single Central European institution. We evaluated epidemiological findings and resistance patterns of pathogens causing surgical site infections. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine risk factors for surgical site infections.

Results

We revealed no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without surgical site infections. Ten surgical site infections (3.9%) were diagnosed (six superficial incisional, two deep incisional, and two organ/space). Eight species (19 strains) were identified, most of which were multi-drug resistant (63%). The most common was extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (26%). We showed that statistically significant differences were present between reoperated and non-reoperated patients (adjusted odds ratio: 6.963, 95% confidence interval 1.523–31.842, P = .012).

Conclusions

Reoperation is an individual risk factor for surgical site infection after kidney transplantation. According to our experience, cefazolin-based prophylaxis can be safe and is associated with relatively low prevalence of surgical site infections.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Reduces the Rate of Surgical Site Infection in Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review

Surgical site infection occurs with high frequency in gastrointestinal surgery, contributing to the high incidence of morbidity and mortality. The accepted practice worldwide for the prevention of surgical site infection is providing single- or multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, most suitable antibiotic and optimal duration of prophylaxis are still debated. The aim of the systematic review is to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis in controlling surgical site infection rate following esophagogastric surgery. PubMed and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until 31 October 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing different antimicrobial regimens in prevention surgical site infections. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with standard methods. Overall, eight studies concerning gastric surgery and one study about esophageal surgery met inclusion criteria. No significant differences were detected between single- and multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Most trials assessed the performance of cephalosporins or inhibitor of bacterial beta-lactamase. Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is effective in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection. Multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis is not recommended for patients undergoing gastric surgery. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of antimicrobial prophylaxis in esophageal cancer patients.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Clean Pediatric Surgical Procedures: A Necessity or Redundancy?

Background

The clinical utility of antimicrobial prophylaxis in clean pediatric surgical cases remains enigmatic. The present study aims to evaluate the prevalence of surgical site infections in instances where antibiotic prophylaxis is not employed prior to clean pediatric surgical procedures.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study that included data of all pediatric clean surgical procedures from January 2018 till January 2020 was conducted. All children undergoing clean surgical procedures who did not receive antibiotics at least two weeks prior to the procedure were included in the study. The exclusion criteria included patients with congenital heart disease, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, nephrotic syndrome, immunodeficiency, and prior administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. All patients were followed for two to four weeks for any signs of surgical site infections.

Results

Of the 178 patients included, 119 were male and 59 were female, with the mean age hovering at 8.19 ± 2.87 years. Orchidopexy and herniotomy were the most commonly performed surgical procedures, and were performed in 56 (31.46%) and 54 (30.33%) patients, respectively. Only one case of postoperative surgical site wound infection was reported, accounting for a prevalence rate of 0.56%.

Conclusion

In clean pediatric surgical procedures, the risk of surgical site infections is exceedingly low. The unnecessary use of antibiotics in children can cause deleterious adverse effects and promote antimicrobial resistance. In a carefully selected pediatric population, administration of antibiotic prophylaxis might confer no added benefit.

Perioperative antibiotics for preventing post-surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for infections due to the complexity of surgical procedures combined with the impact of immunosuppression. No consensus exists on the role of antibiotics for surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of prophylactic antimicrobial agents for preventing surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies was searched up to 21 April 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in any language assessing prophylactic antibiotics in preventing surgical site infections in solid organ transplant recipients at any time point after transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed quality, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Other outcomes included urinary tract infections, pneumonias and septicaemia, death (any cause), graft loss, graft rejection, graft function, adverse reactions to antimicrobial agents, and outcomes identified by the Standardised Outcomes of Nephrology Group (SONG), specifically graft health, cardiovascular disease, cancer and life participation. Summary effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of the evidence was assessed using the risk of bias and the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight eligible studies (718 randomised participants). Overall, five studies (248 randomised participants) compared antibiotics versus no antibiotics, and three studies (470 randomised participants) compared extended duration versus short duration antibiotics. Risk of bias was assessed as high for performance bias (eight studies), detection bias (eight studies) and attrition bias (two studies). It is uncertain whether antibiotics reduce the incidence of surgical site infections as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.85; 5 studies, 226 participants; I² = 25%). The certainty of the evidence was very low for all other reported outcomes (death, graft loss, and other infections). It is uncertain whether extended duration antibiotics reduces the incidence of surgical site infections in either solid organ transplant recipients (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.48; 2 studies, 302 participants; I² = 0%) or kidney-only transplant recipients (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.48; 1 study, 205 participants) as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low. The certainty of the evidence was very low for all other reported outcomes (death, graft loss, and other infections). None of the eight included studies evaluated antimicrobial agent adverse reactions, graft health, cardiovascular disease, cancer, life participation, biochemical and haematological parameters, intervention cost, hospitalisation length, or overall hospitalisation costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to methodological limitations, risk of bias and significant heterogeneity, the current evidence for the use of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics in transplantation is of very low quality. Further high quality, adequately powered RCTs would help better inform clinical practice.

Association Between Preoperative Oral Antibiotics and the Incidence of Postoperative Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk of postoperative Clostridium difficile infection in patients receiving preoperative oral antibiotics remains controversial and a potential barrier for implementation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between preoperative oral antibiotics and the incidence of postoperative C difficile infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, PubMed (not Medline), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to September 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared bowel preparation regimens in adult patients who underwent colorectal surgery were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The incidence of postoperative C difficile infection in adults receiving oral antibiotics versus no oral antibiotics was used as the primary outcome. ORs were pooled using generalized linear/mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Fourteen randomized controlled trials and 13 cohort studies comparing bowel preparation with oral antibiotics to those without oral antibiotics were identified. The pooled OR from 4 eligible randomized controlled trials was suggestive of a greater odds of C difficile infection in the oral antibiotic group (OR = 4.46 (95% CI, 0.96-20.66)); however, the absolute incidence of C difficile infection was extremely low (total 11 events among 2753 patients). The pooled OR from 6 eligible cohort studies did not demonstrate a significant difference in the odds of C difficile infection (OR = 0.88 (95% CI, 0.51-1.52)); again, a very low absolute incidence of C difficile infection was identified (total 830 events among 59,960 patients).

LIMITATIONS

This meta-analysis was limited by the low incidence of C difficile infection reported in the studies and the low number of randomized controlled trials included.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of C difficile infection in patients who undergo colorectal surgery is very low, regardless of bowel preparation regimen used. Considering the beneficial role of oral antibiotics in reducing surgical site infection, the fear for C difficile infection is not sufficient to omit oral antibiotics in this setting.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO - IDCRD42018092148.

Surgical site infections: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs) in solid organ transplantation. SSIs are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients. Depending on the organ transplanted, SSIs occur in 3%-53% of patients, with the highest rates observed in small bowel/multivisceral, liver, and pancreas transplant recipients. These infections are classified by increasing invasiveness as superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space SSIs. The spectrum of organisms implicated in SSIs in SOT recipients is more diverse than the general population due to other important factors such as the underlying end-stage organ failure, immunosuppression, prolonged hospitalizations, organ transportation/preservation, and previous exposures to antibiotics in donors and recipients that could predispose to infections with multidrug-resistant organisms. In this guideline, we describe the epidemiology, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, potential pathogens, and management. We also provide recommendations for the selection, dosing, and duration of peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis to minimize post-operative SSIs.

Increased Resistance of Skin Flora to Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Hip Revision Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND/AIM

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a major complication after total joint replacement and is the primary indication for revision arthroplasty. Specifically, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) can cause low-grade infections. Despite the use of cephalosporin-based antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) and antiseptic treatment at the surgical site, evidence suggests that a significant number of cases of dermal CNS results in low-grade PJI. Thus, this study examined the bacterial colonization and resistance patterns at the surgical site. We hypothesized that the bacteria developed resistance to antibiotics that are frequently used in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety patients, including 63 primary and 27 revision THA patients, were enrolled in this study. For each patient, a single swab of the skin at the surgical site was subjected to clinical microbiology to assess bacterial colonization. Furthermore, resistance to a sentinel panel of antibiotics (benzylpenicillin, erythromycin, tetracycline, oxacillin, fusidic acid, clindamycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin/moxifloxacin, rifampicin, linezolid and vancomycin) was tested.

RESULTS

In 96.7% of the patients, at least one bacterial strain was identified at the surgical site, with CNS strains comprising 93.1% of the total. The sentinel panel showed that 30.7% of the CNS strains exhibited maximal resistance to oxacillin, a commonly used cephalosporin. Additionally, oxacillin resistance increased 1.9-fold (p=0.042) between primary and revision THA. Notably, 8.1% of the CNS stains found on patients undergoing primary THA were resistant to gentamicin, an aminoglycoside, and this rate increased 4.7-fold (p=0.001) for patients undergoing revision THA.

CONCLUSION

CNS strains have significant resistance to standard AMP, particularly in individuals undergoing revision THA.

The effectiveness and safety of two prophylactic antibiotic regimes in hip-fracture surgery

Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefuroxime can reduce the incidence of deep wound infection (DWI) in hip-fracture surgery, but may increase the risk of C. difficile infection (CDI). An alternative is gentamicin with beta-lactam for which a question exists around clinical effectiveness and safety, given the gentamicin-associated nephrotoxicity particularly in the elderly and narrower sensitivity spectrum. We compared 744 consecutive patients (group I-cefuroxime) with 756 in group II (gentamicin + flucloxacillin) who were well matched. There were 4 cases of CDI in the cefuroxime prophylaxis, whereas none in flucloxacillin plus gentamicin (group II). There was a statistically significant (p = 0.036) increased DWI rate in group II (2.5 %) as compared to group I (1.1 %). However, after controlling for age, gender, ASA grade, surgeon grade, implant type and type of anaesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.146). 8.5 % of group I and 16.5 % of group II developed AKI post-operatively (p = 0.023); however, 79 % of group I and 80 % of in group II had complete resolution of AKI prior to their discharge. Further, a significant increase in inpatient deaths (p = 0.057) in group II was observed, but not at 30 days (p = 0.378).

A Prospective Cohort Study To Evaluate the Feasibility of Intraoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery remains debatable. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the feasibility of intraoperative AMP in comparison with conventional AMP in patients undergoing elective open gastrectomy.

METHODS

The duration of AMP was shortened in two six-monthly stages in patients undergoing open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and the incidences of surgical site infections (SSIs) and remote infections (RIs) were surveyed. In the first stage (September 2004 to February 2005), the patients received four intravenous injections of cefazolin 1 g at 12-h intervals starting from 30 min before surgery (conventional AMP). In the second stage (March 2005 to August 2005), the patients received the same agent at three-h intervals starting 30 min before surgery and continuing until the end of the operation (intraoperative AMP).

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients were enrolled, including 202 patients operated on in the first stage of cancer and 221 patients operated on in the second stage. The patient characteristics in the two stages were well balanced. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSIs (10.4% vs. 8.1%; odds ratio [OR], 0.764; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.395-1.480; p = 0.528) or RIs (7.9% vs. 5.9%; OR 0.727; 95% CI 0.340-1.551; p = 0.525) between the two stages. There were no serious adverse events related to the AMP. The treatment effects on the SSIs were similar in all subgroups of patients analyzed. There was no appreciable difference in the trend in the causative pathogens of the SSIs and RIs between the two stages.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative and conventional AMP were associated with similar incidences of SSIs and RIs. Intraoperative AMP appears to be feasible and sufficient in patients undergoing open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Clostridium difficile infection after ileostomy closure mimicking anastomotic leak

Clostridium difficile infection is linked to antibiotic exposure, with elderly and immunocompromised hospitalised patients being particularly at risk. The symptoms range from mild diarrhoea to life-threatening fulminant colitis. We describe an unusual presentation of C. difficile infection after closure of ileostomy in a healthy 60-year-old man with a history of low anterior resection and defunctioning ileostomy for rectal tumour. On the third day postoperatively, the patient developed left lower abdominal pain and profuse diarrhoea. With worsening symptoms and steadily increasing inflammatory markers over the following few days, concerns were raised about an anastomotic leak with pelvic abscess. CT of the abdomen/pelvis on day 7 surprisingly showed colitis in the neorectum/sigmoid colon. A stool test confirmed C. difficile infection.

Inappropriate use of antibiotics and Clostridium difficile infection

We assessed appropriateness of preceding and concurrent antibiotics in 126 consecutive patients with hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infection. In 93 (73.8%) episodes, at least 1 preceding course of antibiotics was inappropriate. We provided feedback on concurrent antibiotics on the day of diagnosis during the final 8 months: 17 of 74 (23.0%) patients were on inappropriate antibiotics. Our recommendations were well received. Reviewing C difficile-infected patients allowed for identification of opportunities to improve antibiotic utilization and potentially improved patient outcomes.

Acute fulminant pseudomembranous colitis which developed after ileostomy closure and required emergent total colectomy: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Pseudomembranous colitis is known to be caused by Clostridium difficile; and, in 3% to 8% of patients, it lapses into an aggressive clinical course that is described as fulminant. We present here a case of extremely rapid and fatal fulminant pseudomembranous colitis that developed after ileostomy closure, a minor surgical procedure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of fatal fulminant pseudomembranous colitis after closure of a diversion ileostomy in an adult.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 69-year-old Japanese man, who had previously undergone low anterior resection and creation of a diverting ileostomy for stage III rectal carcinoma was admitted for ileostomy closure. Preoperatively, he received oral kanamycin and metronidazole along with parenteral cefmetazole. His surgery and postoperative course were uneventful until the third postoperative day, when fever and watery diarrhea became apparent. The next day he presented with epigastric and left lower abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed a slightly distended colon. Later that night, his blood pressure fell and intravenous infusion was started. In the early morning of the fifth postoperative day, his blood pressure could be maintained only with a vasopressor. Follow-up computed tomography demonstrated severe colonic dilation. A colonoscopy confirmed the presence of pseudomembranous colitis, and so oral vancomycin was administered immediately. However, within three hours of the administration, his condition rapidly deteriorated into shock. Although an emergent total colectomy with creation of an end ileostomy was performed, our patient died 26 hours after the surgery. The histopathological examination was consistent with pseudomembranous colitis.

CONCLUSION

It is important to recognize that, although rare, there is a type of extremely aggressive pseudomembranous colitis in which the usual waiting period for medical treatment might be lethal. We consider that colonoscopy and computed tomography are helpful to decide the necessity of emergent surgical treatment without delay.

Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery: prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prolonging antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Prospective before-after cohort study. In 2004, cefazolin was given pre- and intraoperatively at 1g doses while in 2007 it was continued after surgery for 24h. All consecutive adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft, valve, and/or aortic operations during the study periods were included. The primary outcomes were deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess risk factors for DSWI.

RESULTS

954 patients between 1/2004 and 12/2004 were compared to 424 patients between 1/2007 and 6/2007. In 2007, there were significantly more patients >60yrs., emergency and combined operations and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was higher compared to 2004 (8.53% vs. 6.92%, p=0.006). The rate of DSWI decreased non-significantly from 3.8% (36/954) in 2004 to 2.6% (11/424) in 2007, p=0.27. The adjusted odds ratio of the study period for DSWI was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.70-1.13). There was no difference in 30-day (5.2% vs. 5.4%) or 6-month mortality (9.2% in both periods), despite increasing patients' risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis did not result in a significant decrease in DSWI. The value of prolonging antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiac operations should be further evaluated.

Clinical review of the management of fulminant clostridium difficile infection

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality among elderly hospitalized patients. A small but increasing number of patients have developed fulminant CDI, and a significant number of these patients require emergency colectomy. In this review, we discuss the risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of fulminant CDI.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Biosis, Science Citation Index, Ovid Journals) was performed from the period between January 1980 and June 2008 using the key words "Clostridium difficile,""pseudomembranous enterocolitis,""colectomy,""acute abdomen,""antibiotic-associated diarrhea," or "fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis." Articles not in English or not related to human subjects were excluded. For this review, we analyzed the articles identified in our original search and those articles cited in the original review articles. No randomized trials were found on the surgical management of fulminant CDI and only retrospective studies with a minimum of five patients were used in the review. With respect to medical treatment, we based our review on guideline articles, systematic reviews, and available randomized trials.

CONCLUSION

Both the incidence and severity of CDI are increasing. Fulminant CDI is underappreciated as a life-threatening disease because of a lack of awareness of its severity and its nonspecific clinical syndrome. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for a good outcome, and early surgical intervention should be used in patients who are unresponsive to medical therapy. The surgical procedure of choice is a total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy, although the mortality rate remains high.

Infection control measures to limit the spread of Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) presents mainly as a nosocomial infection, usually after antimicrobial therapy. Many outbreaks have been attributed to C. difficile, some due to a new hyper-virulent strain that may cause more severe disease and a worse patient outcome. As a result of CDAD, large numbers of C. difficile spores may be excreted by affected patients. Spores then survive for months in the environment; they cannot be destroyed by standard alcohol-based hand disinfection, and persist despite usual environmental cleaning agents. All these factors increase the risk of C. difficile transmission. Once CDAD is diagnosed in a patient, immediate implementation of appropriate infection control measures is mandatory in order to prevent further spread within the hospital. The quality and quantity of antibiotic prescribing should be reviewed to minimise the selective pressure for CDAD. This article provides a review of the literature that can be used for evidence-based guidelines to limit the spread of C. difficile. These include early diagnosis of CDAD, surveillance of CDAD cases, education of staff, appropriate use of isolation precautions, hand hygiene, protective clothing, environmental cleaning and cleaning of medical equipment, good antibiotic stewardship, and specific measures during outbreaks. Existing local protocols and practices for the control of C. difficile should be carefully reviewed and modified if necessary.

"Collateral damage": antibiotics and the risk of Clostridium difficile infection

Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery are at increased risk for infection, and antimicrobial use continues to be required. Antimicrobial selection, however, is an important consideration given the increasing incidence and severity of C. difficile infection described in the literature. When choosing antimicrobials for prophylaxis and treatment, evaluate patients for risk factors that may predispose them to C. difficile infection. Patients receiving multiple antibiotics or broad-spectrum antibiotics, women, patients with concurrent proton pump inhibitor use, and those with renal failure are at increased risk. Choice of antibiotics should be evaluated for their potential or likelihood to cause C. difficile infection. When a number of these risk factors are present, avoiding the use of high-risk antibiotics may be warranted.

[Long-term usefulness of an information programme on practices in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis]

INTRODUCTION

In France, numerous concordant studies show that there are some discrepancies between guidelines on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the current practice. In a previous study, conducted in April-June 2001, we found that the rate of appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was approximately 40%. An information programme was implemented and the purpose of this paper was to present the short- and long-term usefulness of this campaign.

METHODS

A total of 13 pairs of surgeons/anaesthetists participated in data collection during the three periods of the study. Prescriptions were observed in order to answer to five questions. Five variables describing practices concerning antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery were compared to national recommendations (updated in 1999): did the surgical procedure require antibiotic prophylaxis and was this carried out? Was the antibiotic used appropriate? Was the timing of the first injection optimal? Was the total duration of the treatment correct? Was the dose correct?

RESULTS

The overall compliance with recommendations was significantly improved during the third period (P = 0.0002). This improvement was particularly marked for antimicrobial prophylaxis duration.

CONCLUSION

It seems that sequential surveillance of antimicrobial prophylaxis, including numerous surgical teams, could considerably improve the practices, if it was associated to informations that allowed physicians to appropriate the procedures.

Prophylactic antibiotics adversely affect nosocomial pneumonia in trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Little data are available regarding the impact that prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use (>48 hours) has on the development of nosocomial pneumonia. This retrospective study was conducted to assess the effect that prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use has on the development of nosocomial pneumonia and antibiotic use complications.

METHODS

The records of patients who contracted nosocomial pneumonia during mechanical ventilation were retrospectively reviewed. These patients then were classified into two groups: those who received prolonged prophylactic antibiotics before the diagnosis of pneumonia and those who did not receive antibiotics.

RESULTS

For the patients who received prolonged prophylactic antibiotics, the first pneumonia was diagnosed later, the causative organisms were more likely to be resistant or Gram-negative bacteria, and the incidence of antibiotic complications were two times greater than for patients who did not receive extended antibiotic prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Justification for the use and duration of prolonged (>48 hours) prophylactic antibiotics requires careful reevaluation because this practice is associated with significant clinical complications that lead to increased use of patient resources, lengthened hospital stay, and higher cost.

Gastrointestinal disorders and the critically ill. Clostridium difficile infection and pseudomembranous colitis

Clostridium difficile causes a spectrum of diseases ranging from diarrhoea to pseudomembranous colitis, primarily in the hospitalized elderly, although community-acquired infection is probably under-documented. Host factors are increasingly recognized as critical determinants of disease expression. Exposure to antibiotics, particularly those adversely affecting anaerobic gut flora, appears to create a niche which is exploited by C. difficile. Several retrospective and intervention studies have indicated that third-generation cephalosporins have a high propensity to induce C. difficile diarrhoea. Conversely, some broad-spectrum antibiotics, including ureidopenicillins (e.g. piperacillin-tazobactam) and ciprofloxacin, are less likely to induce C. difficile infection. Effective control of C. difficile in the hospital requires both antibiotic control and prevention of environmental seeding and bacterial spread. Epidemic C. difficile strains are widely distributed in the hospital environment, both as a cause and result of nosocomial diarrhoea. Current treatment options are antibiotic-based, which is less than ideal. Although many biotherapeutic approaches have been tried few have shown real benefit.

[Evaluation of practices in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the Franche-Comté before and after implementation of an information program]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the practices of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the Franche-Comté region of France before and after the implementation of information program.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicenter transversal study type before/after. The information program included a feedback on the observed results during the period before and a meeting with opinion leaders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected by 28 pairs of surgeons/anaesthetists. Prescriptions were analysed to answer five questions about antibiotic prophylaxis practices in surgery: did the surgical procedure require antibiotic prophylaxis and was this carried out? Was the appropriate antibiotic used? Was the timing of the first injection optimal? Was the total duration of the treatment correct? Was the dose correct? Our data were compared to national recommendations (updated in 1999).

RESULTS

The overall frequency of conformity was about 40% both before and after the implementation of an information/awareness campaign. Only the conformity of the total duration of the prophylaxis was significantly higher after the action, but only for interventions that lasted less than two hours. [RR = 2.09 (1.32-3.31), p = 0.001]. This improvement in the total duration of regulation seemed to be related to the more frequent use of written protocols in the surgical units.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that information campaign have little effect within the framework of the good use of antibiotics. We agree with the experts who claim that only an overall strategy including organization, education and restriction will really improve the frequency of conformity of the practices of surgical prophylaxis.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery. Prescription compliance in Franche-Comté with the national reference system]

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in the Franche-Comté region of France.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 36 surgical teams (72 pairs surgeons/anaesthesists) participated in data collection. Five variables describing practices concerning antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery were compared to national recommendations: did the surgical procedure require antibiotic prophylaxis and was it carried out? Was the antibiotic used appropriately? Was the timing of the first injection optimal? Was the total duration of the treatment correct? Was the dose correct?

RESULTS

Among the 687 operations for which data were collected, 513 (74.7%) that corresponded to class 1 or 2 Altemeier operations for which the Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation (SFAR) had drawn up recommendations were analysed in order to answer these questions. The overall frequency of conformity with the regulations was 40% for these 513 operations. Of the 156 patients who did not receive the recommended antibiotic, 133 (85.5%) received an antibiotic with an activity range wider than that of the recommended antibiotic. The duration of prophylaxis was longer than recommended in 80 (87.9%) out of the 91 patients for whom the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis did not respect the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective surveillance showed that less than 50% of patients received an antibiotic prophylaxis that was conformed to the regulations. To ensure the efficiency of prophylaxis and to prevent deleterious effects, such as the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, the recommendations must be regularly respected. Frequent audits of practices should be carried out by the teams responsible for fighting nosocomial infections.

Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea

To test the hypothesis that extended antibiotic prophylaxis increases the risk of Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhoea (CDAD), we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2641 patients under-going cardiovascular surgery. Main outcome measures were the duration of prophylaxis (< 48 h vs. > 48 h) and the occurrence of CDAD. CDAD occurred in 31 patients (1.2%), who were significantly older (70 +/- 9 y vs. 66 +/- 10 y; P = 0.03), received more therapeutic antibiotics (2.2 +/- 1.9 vs. 0.4 +/- 0.9; P = 0.001) and had a longer postoperative hospital stay (26 +/- 19 d vs. 9 +/- 8 d; P < 0.001) than non-cases. After adjusting for confounding, we did not observe an association between prolonged prophylaxis and CDAD [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.8; CI, 0.4-1.8]. In contrast, three independent predictors were identified: increasing length of hospital stay (AOR per one-day-increment, 1.03; CI, 1.01-1.05), and treatment with third generation cephalosporins (AOR, 5.9; CI, 2.2-16.0) or beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (AOR, 4.6; CI, 1.7-12.3). Our results did not confirm that extended prophylaxis after clean surgery increases the risk of CDAD, which remains an uncommon postoperative complication, associated even with short antibiotic exposure.

Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiovascular surgery and its effect on surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence supporting short antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP), it is still common practice to continue ABP for more than 48 hours after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To compare the effect of short (<48 hours) versus prolonged (>48 hours) ABP on surgical site infections (SSIs) and acquired antimicrobial resistance, we conducted an observational 4-year cohort study at a tertiary-care center. An experienced infection control nurse performed prospective surveillance of 2641 patients undergoing CABG surgery. The main exposure was the duration of ABP, and main outcomes were the adjusted rate of SSI and the isolation of cephalosporin-resistant enterobacteriaceae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (acquired antibiotic resistance). Adjustment for confounding was performed by multivariable modeling. A total of 231 SSIs (8.7%) occurred after a median of 16 days, including 93 chest-wound infections (3.5%) and 13 deep-organ-space infections (0. 5%). After 1502 procedures using short ABP, 131 SSIs were recorded, compared with 100 SSIs after 1139 operations with prolonged ABP (crude OR, 1.0; CI, 0.8 to 1.3). After adjustment for possible confounding, prolonged ABP was not associated with a decreased risk of SSI (adjusted OR, 1.2; CI, 0.8 to 1.6) and was correlated with an increased risk of acquired antibiotic resistance (adjusted OR, 1.6; CI, 1.1 to 2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm that continuing ABP beyond 48 hours after CABG surgery is still widespread; however, this practice is ineffective in reducing SSI, increases antimicrobial resistance, and should therefore be avoided.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment

PURPOSE

This review examines the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and current medical and operative strategies in the treatment of Clostridium difficile diarrhea and colitis. Prevention and future avenues of research are also investigated.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted with the use of MEDLINE.

RESULTS

C. difficile is a gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium capable of causing toxigenic colitis in susceptible patients, usually those receiving antibiotics. Overgrowth of toxigenic strains may result in a spectrum of disease, including becoming an asymptomatic carrier, diarrhea, self-limited colitis, fulminant colitis, and toxic megacolon. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion and depends on clinical data, laboratory stool studies (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay and cytotoxin test), and endoscopy in selected cases. Protocols for treatment of primary and relapsing infections are provided in algorithm format. Discontinuation of antibiotics may be enough to resolve symptoms. Medical management with oral metronidazole or vancomycin is the first-line therapy for those with symptomatic colitis. Teicoplanin, Saccharomyces spp. and Lactobacillus spp., and intravenous IgG antitoxin are reserved for more recalcitrant cases. Refractory or relapsing infections may require vancomycin given orally or other newer modalities. Fulminant colitis and toxic megacolon warrant subtotal colectomy. Cost, in terms of extended hospital stay, medical and surgical management, and, in some cases, ward closure, is thought to be formidable. Review of perioperative antibiotic policies and analysis of hospital formularies may contribute to prevention and decreased costs.

CONCLUSION

C. difficile diarrhea and colitis is a nosocomial infection that may result in significant morbidity, mortality, and medical costs. Standard laboratory studies and endoscopic evaluation assist in the diagnosis of clinically suspicious cases. Appropriate perioperative antibiotic dosing, narrowing the antibiotic spectrum when treating infections, and discontinuing antibiotics at appropriate intervals prevent toxic sequelae.

Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection

A systematic review of the literature to identify risk factors associated with Clostridium difficile infection was conducted. Two main outcomes were considered: C. difficile diarrhoea and C. difficile carriage. A qualitative assessment, based on a set of defined and consistently applied criteria, appeared to be the best approach for risk factors other than antibiotic use, as an approach based on meta-analysis would have utilized only the information provided by a minority of the studies. Risk factors for which there was evidence suggestive or consistent with an association with C. difficile diarrhoea were: increasing age (excluding infancy), severity of underlying diseases, non-surgical gastrointestinal procedures, presence of a nasogastric tube, anti-ulcer medications, stay on ITU, duration of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic course, administration of multiple antibiotics. For malignant haematological disorders there was evidence of an association only with C. difficile carriage, but there were no suitable studies to explore a possible association of this risk factor with symptomatic infection. Antibiotic use lent itself to quantitative assessment with meta-analysis using logistic regression. Exposure to an antibiotic was shown to be statistically significantly associated with both C. difficile diarrhoea and C. difficile carriage. The meta-analysis approach enabled the ranking of individual antibiotics in relation to the risk of C. difficile infection, though the 95% confidence intervals were often wide and overlapping. Antibiotics associated with a lower risk of C. difficile diarrhoea should be considered, especially when attempting to control a C. difficile outbreak or when prescribing for a patient with other C. difficile risk factors. This systematic review of the literature enabled the identification of features it would be desirable to consider in future epidemiological studies.

Antibiotics for the acute abdomen

Antibiotics are only an adjunct to proper surgical therapy for the treatment of the acute abdomen associated with bacterial secondary peritonitis. Upon presentation, all patients require a preoperative dose of antibiotics for prophylaxis against infection of remaining sterile tissues. Patients found intraoperatively to have an established peritoneal infection benefit from an immediate postoperative course of therapeutic antibiotics. A regimen that adequately covers facultative and aerobic gram-negative bacilli and anaerobic organisms is essential. The duration of therapeutic antibiotics is probably best decided on an individual patient basis. The goal of antibiotics is to reduce the concentration of bacteria invading tissues. The pathogens of bacterial peritonitis are influenced by such factors as the patient's pre-existing chronic diseases, state of acute physiologic debilitation, immunocompetence, recent antibiotic use, recent hospitalization, and neutralization of gastric acidity. Intraoperative peritoneal cultures are most useful in patients suspected of having impaired local host defenses. In these patients, all identified organisms, such as Enterococcus or Candida, may be potential pathogens. The common practice of administering empiric and prolonged courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients who manifest persistent signs of inflammation may be more harmful than beneficial. These patients warrant an exhaustive search for extra-abdominal and intraperitoneal sources of new infection. Otherwise, such use of antibiotics may continue to promote the selection of bacteria that are highly resistant to conventional antibiotics and permit the overgrowth of organisms commonly seen with tertiary peritonitis. The best chance of resolving bacterial peritonitis is through early, aggressive surgical management complemented by short courses of potent antibiotics and appropriate physiologic support. Through these efforts, the clinician tries to help the systemic inflammatory response to benefit the host and not become unregulated, result in MOFS, and produce a high mortality.

Clostridium difficile colitis after aortic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and outcome of Clostridium difficile colitis (CDC) following aortic surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study, and case-note review.

PATIENTS

Of 180 patients undergoing aortic surgery for either aneurysmal or occlusive disease between 1 September 1994 and 31 August 1996 (24 months), 15 (8.4%) developed CDC. There were 12 male and three female patients of median age 65 (range 46-84).

RESULTS

Two patients died from multiple organ failure in association with CDC, one of whom underwent negative relaparotomy for suspected ischaemic bowel because the diagnosis of CDC had not been entertained. Previously identified risk factors for CDC comprised: age > 65 (eight); renal impairment (four); chronic obstructive airways disease (seven); coexistent malignancy (three); admission from another hospital (four); H2 antagonist therapy (13); ITU (nine); and/or HDU care (14). Diarrhoea commenced a median of 9 (range 5-26) days, and CDC, was diagnosed a median of 14 (range 10-26) days after operation. All patients received intravenous Cefuroxime, originally prescribed as prophylaxis, for a median of 6 (range 3-16) days prior to onset of CDC. Two patients received 1 additional antibiotic; one received 2; two received 3; and one received 4 prior to onset of CDC.

CONCLUSIONS

CDC is a common and potentially serious complication of vascular, and in particular, aortic surgery. Although such patients often possess several risk factors for CDC, colitis frequently follows prolonged 'prophylactic' cephalosporin administration, which should therefore be avoided.

Nosocomial infections and nosocomial pneumonia

Nosocomial infections are a major source of revenue loss, morbidity, and even mortality to surgical patients. This review presents current issues regarding nosocomial infections and nosocomial pneumonias. This study is a literature review that presents material on nosocomial infections in general and details regarding Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infections. Nosocomial infections, including pneumonias, are serious medical complications, and prevention by strict adherence to barrier precaution is the most important means of protecting the patient from hospital-acquired bacterial flora.

Let us shorten antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy in surgery

Excessive duration of antibiotics for prophylaxis and treatment of surgical infection appears to be the principal reason for "inappropriate" administration in current surgical practice. The main factors to blame are the inability of the clinician to distinguish between contamination, infection, and inflammation. Failure to distinguish between contamination and infection is the reason that prophylaxis is unnecessarily carried through into the postoperative phase for prolonged periods. Failure to distinguish between infection and inflammation misguides surgeons to continue antibiotics for unnecessarily long treatment periods. The concept for shortening courses of antibiotic administration is supported by a forum of experts. The majority of experts also favored a trend away from the use of therapeutic courses of fixed duration, by tailoring the duration of administration to the intraoperative findings to shorten treatment courses. Specific recommendations are (1) contamination: single dose prophylaxis (gastroduodenal peptic perforations operated within 12 hours, traumatic enteric perforations operated within 12 hours, peritoneal contamination with bowel contents during elective or emergency procedures, early or phlegmonous appendicitis, or phlegmonous cholecystitis); (2) resectable infection: 24-hour postoperative antibiotics (appendectomy for gangrenous appendicitis, cholecystectomy for gangrenous cholecystitis, bowel resection for ischemic or strangulated "dead" bowel without frank perforation); (3) advanced infection: 48 hours to 5 days, based on operative findings and patient's condition (intra-abdominal infection from diverse sources); (4) severe infection with the source not easily controllable: longer administration periods may be necessary (e.g., infected pancreatic necrosis).