1
|
Linassi F, Kreuzer M, Maran E, Farnia A, Zanatta P, Navalesi P, Carron M. Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244145. [PMID: 33351856 PMCID: PMC7755218 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Aging affects pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics of anesthetics, but age effects on Entropy-guided total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusions (TIVA-TCI) are not fully characterized. We compared aging effects on effective estimated brain concentration of Propofol (CeP) during TIVA-TCI Entropy-guided anesthesia, without neuromuscular blockade (NMB). METHODS We performed an observational, prospective, single-center study enrolling 75 adult women undergoing Entropy-guided Propofol-Remifentanil TIVA-TCI for breast surgery. Primary endpoint was the relationship between age and CeP at maintenance of anesthesia (MA) during Entropy-guided anesthesia. Secondary endpoints were relationships between age and CeP at arousal reaction (AR), return of consciousness (ROC) and explicit recall evenience. We calculated a linear model to evaluate the age's impact on observational variable and performed pairwise tests to compare old (≥65 years, n = 50) and young (<65 years, n = 25) patients or patients with and without an AR. RESULTS We did not observe age-related differences in CeP during MA, but CeP significantly (p = 0,01) decreased with age at ROC. Entropy values during MA increased with age and were significantly higher in the elderly (RE: median 56[IQR49.3-61] vs 47.5[42-52.5],p = 0.001; SE: 51.6[45-55.5] vs 44[IQR40-50],p = 0.005). 18 patients had an AR, having higher maximum RE (92.5[78-96.3] vs 65[56.5-80.5],p<0.001), SE (79[64.8-84] vs 61[52.5-69],p = 0.03, RE-SE (12.5[9.5-16.5] vs 6 [3-9],p<0.001. CONCLUSION Older age was associated with lower CeP at ROC, but not during MA in unparalysed patients undergoing breast surgery. Although RE and SE during MA, at comparable CeP, were higher in the elderly, Entropy, and in particular an increasing RE-SE, is a reliable index to detect an AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Linassi
- Department of Medicine—DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Kreuzer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Eleonora Maran
- Department of Medicine—DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Antonio Farnia
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazzale Ospedale, Treviso, Italy
| | - Paolo Zanatta
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Navalesi
- Department of Medicine—DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Carron
- Department of Medicine—DIMED, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Continuing professional development module : An updated introduction to electroencephalogram-based brain monitoring during intended general anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2020; 67:1858-1878. [PMID: 33190217 PMCID: PMC7666718 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01820-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The electroencephalogram (EEG) provides a reliable reflection of the brain's electrical state, so it can reassure us that the anesthetic agents are actually reaching the patient's brain, and are having the desired effect. In most patients, the EEG changes somewhat predictably in response to propofol and volatile agents, so a frontal EEG channel can guide avoidance of insufficient and excessive administration of general anesthesia. Persistent alpha-spindles (around 10 Hz) phase-amplitude coupled with slow delta waves (around 1 Hz) are commonly seen during an "appropriate hypnotic state of general anesthesia". Such patterns can be appreciated from the EEG waveform or from the spectrogram (a colour-coded display of how the power in the various EEG frequencies changes with time). Nevertheless, there are exceptions to this. For example, administration of ketamine and nitrous oxide is generally not associated with the aforementioned alpha-spindle coupled with delta wave pattern. Also, some patients, including older adults and those with neurodegenerative disorders, are less predisposed to generate a strong electroencephalographic "alpha-spindle" pattern during general anesthesia. There might also be some rare instances when the frontal EEG shows a pattern suggestive of general anesthesia, while the patient has some awareness and is able to follow simple commands, albeit this is typically without obvious distress or memory formation. Thus, the frontal EEG alone, as currently analyzed, is an imperfect but clinically useful mirror, and more scientific insights will be needed before we can claim to have a reliable readout of brain "function" during general anesthesia.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fritz BA, King CR, Ben Abdallah A, Lin N, Mickle AM, Budelier TP, Oberhaus J, Park D, Maybrier HR, Wildes TS, Avidan MS, Apakama G, Aranake-Chrisinger A, Bolzenius J, Burton J, Cui V, Emmert DA, Goswami S, Graetz TJ, Gupta S, Jordan K, Kronzer A, McKinnon SL, Muench MR, Murphy MR, Palanca BJ, Patel A, Spencer JW, Stevens TW, Strutz P, Tedeschi CM, Torres BA, Trammel ER, Upadhyayula RT, Winter AC, Jacobsohn E, Fong T, Gallagher J, Inouye SK, Schmitt EM, Somerville E, Stark S, Lenze EJ, Melby SJ, Tappenden J. Preoperative Cognitive Abnormality, Intraoperative Electroencephalogram Suppression, and Postoperative Delirium: A Mediation Analysis. Anesthesiology 2020; 132:1458-1468. [PMID: 32032096 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative delirium is a common complication that hinders recovery after surgery. Intraoperative electroencephalogram suppression has been linked to postoperative delirium, but it is unknown if this relationship is causal or if electroencephalogram suppression is merely a marker of underlying cognitive abnormalities. The hypothesis of this study was that intraoperative electroencephalogram suppression mediates a nonzero portion of the effect between preoperative abnormal cognition and postoperative delirium. METHODS This is a prespecified secondary analysis of the Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENGAGES) randomized trial, which enrolled patients age 60 yr or older undergoing surgery with general anesthesia at a single academic medical center between January 2015 and May 2018. Patients were randomized to electroencephalogram-guided anesthesia or usual care. Preoperative abnormal cognition was defined as a composite of previous delirium, Short Blessed Test cognitive score greater than 4 points, or Eight Item Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia score greater than 1 point. Duration of intraoperative electroencephalogram suppression was defined as number of minutes with suppression ratio greater than 1%. Postoperative delirium was detected via Confusion Assessment Method or chart review on postoperative days 1 to 5. RESULTS Among 1,113 patients, 430 patients showed evidence of preoperative abnormal cognition. These patients had an increased incidence of postoperative delirium (151 of 430 [35%] vs.123 of 683 [18%], P < 0.001). Of this 17.2% total effect size (99.5% CI, 9.3 to 25.1%), an absolute 2.4% (99.5% CI, 0.6 to 4.8%) was an indirect effect mediated by electroencephalogram suppression, while an absolute 14.8% (99.5% CI, 7.2 to 22.5%) was a direct effect of preoperative abnormal cognition. Randomization to electroencephalogram-guided anesthesia did not change the mediated effect size (P = 0.078 for moderation). CONCLUSIONS A small portion of the total effect of preoperative abnormal cognition on postoperative delirium was mediated by electroencephalogram suppression. Study precision was too low to determine if the intervention changed the mediated effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A Fritz
- From the Department of Anesthesiology (B.A.F., C.R.K., A.B., A.M.M., T.P.B., J.O., D.P., H.R.M., T.S.W., M.S.A) the Division of Biostatistics (N.L.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (N.L.). Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Anesthesiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada Department of Medicine, Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Medicine, Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Medicine, Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Medicine, Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|