Medicare Enrollment Among Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease Receiving Dialysis in Outpatient Facilities Between 2005 and 2016

Expanding Access to High KDPI Kidney Transplant for Recipients Aged 60 y and Older: Cost Utility and Survival

Background

Modern organ allocation systems are tasked with equitably maximizing the utility of transplanted organs. Increasing the use of deceased donor organs at risk of discard may be a cost-effective strategy to improve overall transplant benefit. We determined the survival implications and cost utility of increasing the use of marginal kidneys in an older adult Canadian population of patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Methods

We constructed a cost-utility model with microsimulation from the perspective of the Canadian single-payer health system for incident transplant waitlisted patients aged 60 y and older. A kidney donor profile index score of ≥86 was considered a marginal kidney. Donor- and recipient-level characteristics encompassed in the kidney donor profile index and estimated posttransplant survival scores were used to derive survival posttransplant. Patients were followed up for 10 y from the date of waitlist initiation. Our analysis compared the routine use of marginal kidneys (marginal kidney scenario) with the current practice of limited use (status quo scenario).

Results

The 10-y mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years per patient in the marginal kidney scenario were estimated at $379 485.33 (SD: $156 872.49) and 4.77 (SD: 1.87). In the status quo scenario, the mean cost and quality-adjusted life-years per patient were $402 937.68 (SD: $168 508.85) and 4.37 (SD: 1.87); thus, the intervention was considered dominant. At 10 y, 62.8% and 57.0% of the respective cohorts in the marginal kidney and status quo scenarios remained alive.

Conclusions

Increasing the use of marginal kidneys in patients with end-stage kidney disease aged 60 y and older may offer cost savings, improved quality of life, and greater patient survival in comparison with usual care.

Frailty screening for determination of hemodialysis access placement

OBJECTIVE

Choosing the right hemodialysis vascular access for frail patients remains difficult because the patient's preferences and the likelihood of access function and survival must be considered. We hypothesize that patients identified before arteriovenous (AV) access as frail by the PRISMA-7 score may have worse outcomes, indicating that fistula creation may not be the most clinically beneficial option and it would be in the best interest of the patient to receive either AV graft (AVG) placement or dialysis through a percutaneous catheter. Our pilot study aims to determine whether an association exists between patient frailty as defined by PRISMA-7 and newly created AV fistula (AVF) and AVG access outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single institutional prospective cohort study of patients undergoing new AVF or AVG intervention from April 2021 to May 2023. Patients were assessed using the PRISMA-7 frailty questionnaire before their AV access surgery. Patients were grouped by frailty score and score groups were examined for trends. Univariable analysis was performed for baseline differences between frail and nonfrail patients. Failure to achieve maturation, postoperative infection, and 180-day mortality difference was also investigated for frail vs nonfrail patients. Univariable analysis was performed for nonmaturation using standard comorbidities, arterial and venous diameters, and frailty. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed for the outcome of nonmaturation using frailty as one of the variables in conjunction with the univariable risks associated with nonmaturation.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients undergoing new AV access placement were investigated, among whom 53% were designated as frail (PRISMA-7 score ≥3). When comparing the frail and nonfrail new AV access groups, the access (AVF and AVG combined) failed in 48% (10/21) of the frail patients, but only failed in 5% (1/19) of the nonfrail patients 1 (P = .012). When distinguishing between AV access types, AVF creations followed the overall trend with 60% of AVF access (9/15) sites in frail patients failing to mature when compared with nonfrail patients, who all had fistulas that matured to use (P = .049). Surgical site infection was absent in all frail patients and present in 5% of nonfrail patients (1/19). Both 30-day and 60-day readmission rates were higher in the frail group compared with the nonfrail group. There was 180-day mortality present in 5 of frail patients % (1/21) and absent in nonfrail patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that both frailty (adjusted odd ratio, 10.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-82.25); P = .033) and younger age (adjusted odd ratio, 0.953; 95% confidence interval, 0.923-0.983; P = .002) both had a significant association with nonmaturation. Power analysis revealed a power statistic of 0.898 indicating a probability of type 2 error of 10.02% with a P value of .002. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit for the logistic regression had 75% overall accuracy for the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient frailty is significantly associated with an increased incidence of AV access failure to mature.

Health care disparities involved in establishing functional arteriovenous fistula hemodialysis access

OBJECTIVE

Race-related disparities in outcomes associated with cardiovascular disease are well-documented. Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation can be a challenge in establishing functional access in the population of patients with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. We sought to investigate the incidence of adjunctive procedures required to establish fistula maturation and evaluate the association with demographic factors including patient race.

METHODS

This study was a single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing first-time AVF creation for hemodialysis from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2021. Subsequent arteriovenous access interventions, such as percutaneous angioplasty, fistula superficialization, branch ligation and embolization, surgical revision, and thrombectomy, were recorded. The total number of interventions performed after index operation was recorded. Demographic data including age, sex, race, and ethnicity was recorded. The need for and number of subsequent interventions was evaluated using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 669 patients were included in this study. Patients were 60.8% male and 39.2% female. Race was reported as White in 329 (49.2%), Black in 211 (31.5%), Asian in 27 (4.0%), and other/unknown in 102 (15.3%). Of the patients, 355 (53.1%) underwent no additional procedures after initial AVF creation, 188 (28.1%) underwent one additional procedure, 73 (10.9%) had two additional procedures, and 53 (7.9%) had three or more additional procedures. As compared with the White reference group, Black patients were at higher risk of having maintenance interventions (relative risk [RR], 1.900; P ≤ .0001) and additional AVF creation interventions (RR, 1.332; P = .05), and total interventions (RR, 1.551; P ≤ .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients were at significantly higher risk of undergoing additional surgical procedures, including both maintenance and new fistula creations, as compared with their counterparts of other racial groups. Further exploration of the root cause of these disparities is necessary to facilitate the achievement of equivalent high-quality outcomes across racial groups.

The Association of Dialysis Facility Payer Mix With Access to Kidney Transplantation

Importance

Insurance coverage for patients with end-stage kidney disease has shifted toward more commercially insured patients at dialysis facilities. The associations among insurance status, facility-level payer mix, and access to kidney transplantation are unclear.

Objective

To determine the association of dialysis facility commercial payer mix and 1-year incidence of wait-listing for kidney transplantation, and to delineate the association of commercial insurance at the patient vs facility level.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective population-based cohort study used data from the United States Renal Data System from 2013 to 2018. Participants included patients aged 18 to 75 years initiating chronic dialysis between 2013 and 2017, excluding patients with a prior kidney transplant or with major contraindications to kidney transplant. Data were analyzed from August 2021 and May 2023.

Exposure

Dialysis facility commercial payer mix, calculated as the proportion of patients with commercial insurance per facility.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was patients added to a waiting list for kidney transplant within 1 year of dialysis initiation. Multivariable Cox regression, censoring for death, was used to adjust for patient-level (demographic, socioeconomic, and medical) and facility-level factors.

Results

A total of 233 003 patients (97 617 [41.9%] female patients; mean [SD] age, 58.0 [12.1] years) across 6565 facilities met inclusion criteria. Participants included 70 062 Black patients (30.1%), 42 820 Hispanic patients (18.4%), 105 368 White patients (45.2%), and 14 753 patients (6.3%) who identified as another race or ethnicity (eg, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and multiracial). Of 6565 dialysis facilities, the mean (SD) commercial payer mix was 21.2% (15.6 percentage points). Patient-level commercial insurance was associated with increased incidence of wait-listing (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.80-1.93; P < .001). At the facility-level and before covariate adjustment, higher commercial payer mix was associated with increased wait-listing (fourth vs first payer mix quartile [Q]: HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.67-1.91; P < .001). However, after covariate-adjustment, including adjusting for patient-level insurance status, commercial payer mix was not significantly associated with outcome (Q4 vs Q1: aHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.09; P = .60).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this national cohort study of patients newly initiated on chronic dialysis, although patient-level commercial insurance was associated with higher access to the kidney transplant waiting lists, there was no independent association of facility-level commercial payer mix with patients being added to waiting lists for transplant. As the landscape of insurance coverage for dialysis evolves, the potential downstream impact on access to kidney transplant should be monitored.

Assessment of Spending for Patients Initiating Dialysis Care

IMPORTANCE

Despite a widespread belief that private insurers spend large amounts on health care for enrollees receiving dialysis, data limitations over the past decade have precluded a comprehensive analysis of the topic.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the amount and types of increases in health care spending for privately insured patients associated with initiating dialysis care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cohort study covering calendar years 2012 to 2019 included patients with kidney failure who had employer-sponsored insurance for 12 months following dialysis initiation. Data analysis was performed from August 27, 2021, to August 18, 2022. The data cover the entirety of the US and were obtained from the Health Care Cost Institute. The data include all medical claims for enrollees in employer-sponsored health insurance plans offered by multiple major health care insurers within the US. Participants included patients younger than 65 years who were continuously enrolled in these plans in the 12 months before and after their first claim for dialysis care. Patients also had to have nonmissing documented key characteristics, such as sex, race and ethnicity, and health characteristics.

EXPOSURES

A claim for dialysis care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Out-of-pocket, inpatient, outpatient, physician services, prescription medication, and total health care spending. The hypothesis tested was formulated before data collection.

RESULTS

The sample included 309 800 enrollee-months, which was a balanced panel of 25 months for 12 392 enrollees. At baseline, 7534 patients (61%) were male, 5415 (44%) were aged 55 to 64 years, and patients had been enrolled with their insurer for a mean of 30 months (95% CI, 29.9-30.1 months). In the 12 months before initiating dialysis care, total monthly health care spending was $5025 per patient per month (95% CI, $4945-$5106). Dialysis care initiation was associated with an increase in total monthly spending of $14 685 (95% CI, $14 413-$14 957). This increase occurred across all spending categories (dialysis, nondialysis outpatient, inpatient, physician services, and prescription drugs). Monthly patient out-of-pocket spending increased by $170 (95% CI, $162-$178). These spending increases occurred abruptly, beginning about 2 months before dialysis initiation, and remained increased for the subsequent 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, evidence that private insurers experience significant, sustained increases in spending when patients initiated dialysis was noted. The findings suggest that proposed policies aimed at limiting the amount dialysis facilities charge private insurers and the enrollees has the potential to reduce health care spending in this high-cost population.

Rates of Medicare Enrollment Among Dialysis Patients After Implementation of Medicare Payment Reform and the Affordable Care Act Marketplace

IMPORTANCE

Medicare finances health care for most US patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), regardless of age. The 2011 Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for dialysis reduced reimbursement for hemodialysis, and the 2014 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace increased patient access to new private insurance options, potentially influencing organizations that provide health care, such as hospitals, nursing homes, and dialysis facilities, to adjust their payer mix away from Medicare sources.

OBJECTIVE

To describe Medicare enrollment trends among patients with incident ESKD in 2006 to 2016.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study involved US patients aged 18 to 64 years who were not enrolled in Medicare at dialysis initiation in 2006 to 2016, with 1-year follow-up through 2017. Data analysis was conducted April 2021 to June 2022.

EXPOSURES

The exposure of interest was a 3-category indicator of time, whether patients initiated dialysis before policies were enacted (2006-2010), in the first years of the Medicare ESKD PPS (2011-2013), or during the Medicare ESKD PPS and implementation of the ACA Marketplace (2014-2016).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient-level Medicare enrollment through the first year of dialysis. Logistic regression and Cox models were used to examine associations of time, patient characteristics, and Medicare enrollment, adjusting for patient demographic, clinical, and market-level characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 335 157 patients aged 18 to 64 years with ESKD not actively enrolled in Medicare when they initiated dialysis in 2006 to 2016, the mean (SD) age was 49.9 (10.8) years, 198 164 (59.1%) were men, 188 290 (56.2%) were White, and 313 622 (93.6%) received in-center hemodialysis. New Medicare enrollment was higher in 2006 to 2010 (110 582 patients [73.1%]) than after the Medicare ESKD PPS and ACA Marketplace in 2014 to 2016 (55 382 patients [58.5%]). In adjusted analyses, declining Medicare enrollment was associated with implementation of 2011 Medicare ESKD PPS and 2014 ACA policies and was disproportionately lower among younger, racially minoritized, and ethnically Hispanic patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There was declining Medicare enrollment among new dialysis patients associated with the 2011 Medicare ESKD PPS and 2014 ACA Marketplace that raise concerns about benefits and harms to patients and payers and continued disparities in kidney care. As the dialysis payer mix moves toward higher proportions of patients not covered by Medicare, it will be important to understand the implications for health care system and patient outcomes.

Trends in Dialysis Industry Consolidation After Medicare Payment Reform, 2006-2016

Question

Findings

Meaning

Importance

Objective

Design, Setting, and Participants

Exposures

Main Outcomes and Measures

Results

Conclusions and Relevance

Payment for Dialysis Services in the Individual Market

This cross-sectional study examines the prevalence and spending of patients with end-stage kidney disease in the individual market.