Absence of seroconversion of HIV-1 antibody in seroreactive individuals

Three cases of HIV-1 seroreversion

Three patients were enrolled, two as hemophiliacs, and one with acute EBV infection. Serial serum samples of each patient were tested with at least 3 different HIV antibody EIA tests, an immunofluo-rescent test and two western blots (WB). In the third case, PCR and reverse transcriptase enzyme activity measurement were also done. One of the regularly checked serum samples of hemophiliac patients was reactive with different HIV screening and confirmatory assays. Their next blood samples, two weeks and one month later, respectively, were negative with the same tests. In Case 3. two and a half years after the first examination, the EIA tests results changed to negative, but the WB was still indeterminate. In the case of the two hemophiliac patients, the patients may have been exposed to HIV containing blood products (before 1985), but were not infected. Regular treatment with factor VIII concentrate, in which HIV antigens may be present, can boost the immune response and results in transient seropositivity. In the case of the EBV infected patient, the transient HIV seropositivity may be the consequence of EBV induced proliferation of anti-HIV-antibody producing B cell clones. During our ten year HIV confirmatory practice we tested more than 40000 samples, from which transient seropositivity were observed only in the three cases summarized in this paper.

Five myths about AIDS that have misdirected research and treatment

A number of widely repeated and factually incorrect myths have pervaded the AIDS research literature, misdirecting research and treatment. Five of the most outstanding are: 1) that all risk groups develop AIDS at the same rate following HIV infection; 2) that there are no true seroreversions following HIV infection; 3) that antibody is protective against HIV infection; 4) that the only way to treat AIDS effectively is through retroviral therapies; and 5) that since HIV is so highly correlated with AIDS incidence, it must be the sole necessary and sufficient cause of AIDS. A huge body of research, reviewed in this paper, demonstrates the falsity of these myths. 1) The average number of years between HIV infection and AIDS is greater than 20 years for mild hemophiliacs, 14 years for young severe hemophiliacs, 10 years for old severe hemophiliacs, 10 years for homosexual men, 6 years for transfusion patients of all ages, 2 years for transplant patients, and 6 months for perinatally infected infants. These differences can only be explained in terms of risk-group associated cofactors. 2) Seroreversions are common. Between 10 and 20 percent of HIV-seronegative people in high risk groups have T-cell immunity to HIV, and may have had one or more verified positive HIV antibody tests in the past. 3) Antibody, far from being protective against HIV, appears to be highly diagnostic of loss of immune regulation of HIV, and some evidence of antibody-enhancement of infection exists. 4) Non-retroviral treatments of HIV infection, including safer sex practices, elimination of drug use, high nutrient diets, and limited reexposure to HIV and its cofactors have proven to be effective means of preventing or delaying onset of AIDS. 5) Many immunosuppressive factors, including drug use, multiple concurrent infections, and exposure to alloantigens, are as highly correlated with AIDS risk groups as HIV. These data are more consistent with AIDS being a multifactorial or synergistic disease than a monofactorial one.