1
|
Slade DAJ. Open abdomen in secondary peritonitis: time for closure. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae013. [PMID: 38298065 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
|
2
|
Fernandez CA. Damage Control Surgery and Transfer in Emergency General Surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2023; 103:1269-1281. [PMID: 37838467 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
Selective non traumatic emergency surgery patients are targets for damage control surgery (DCS) to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome and the lethal triad. However, DCS is still a subject of controversy. As a concept, DCS describes a series of abbreviated surgical procedures to allow rapid source control of hemorrhage and contamination in patients with circulatory shock to allow resuscitation and stabilization in the intensive care unit followed by delayed return to the operating room for definitive surgical management once the patient becomes physiologic stable. If appropriately applied, the DCS morbidity and mortality can be significantly reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos A Fernandez
- Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, 7710 Mercy Road, Suite 2000, Omaha, NE 68124, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Risinger WB, Smith JW. Damage control surgery in emergency general surgery: What you need to know. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95:770-779. [PMID: 37439768 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Damage-control surgery (DCS) is a strategy adopted to limit initial operative interventions in the unstable surgical patient, delaying definitive repairs and abdominal wall closure until physiologic parameters have improved. Although this concept of "physiology over anatomy" was initially described in the management of severely injured trauma patients, the approaches of DCS have become common in the management of nontraumatic intra-abdominal emergencies.While the utilization of damage-control methods in emergency general surgery (EGS) is controversial, numerous studies have demonstrated improved outcomes, making DCS an essential technique for all acute care surgeons. Following a brief history of DCS and its indications in the EGS patient, the phases of DCS will be discussed including an in-depth review of preoperative resuscitation, techniques for intra-abdominal source control, temporary abdominal closure, intensive care unit (ICU) management of the open abdomen, and strategies to improve abdominal wall closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William B Risinger
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Proaño-Zamudio JA, Argandykov D, Renne A, Gebran A, Dorken-Gallastegi A, Paranjape CN, Kaafarani HMA, King DR, Velmahos GC, Hwabejire JO. Revisiting abdominal closure in mesenteric ischemia: is there an association with outcome? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:2017-2024. [PMID: 36478280 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02199-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current guidelines advocate liberal use of delayed abdominal closure in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) undergoing laparotomy. Few studies have systematically examined this practice. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of delayed abdominal closure on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with AMI. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2013-2017 registry. We included patients with a diagnosis of AMI undergoing emergency laparotomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of abdominal closure: (1) delayed fascial closure (DFC) when no layers of the abdominal wall were closed and (2) immediate fascial closure (IFC) if deep layers or all layers of the abdominal wall were closed. Propensity score matching was performed based on comorbidities, pre-operative, and operative characteristics. Univariable analysis was performed on the matched sample. RESULTS The propensity-matched cohort consisted of 1520 patients equally divided into the DFC and IFC groups. The median (IQR) age was 68 (59-77), and 836 (55.0%) were female. Compared to IFC, the DFC group showed increased in-hospital mortality (38.9% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.002), 30-day mortality (42.4% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.012), and increased risk of respiratory failure (59.5% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The delayed fascial closure technique was associated with increased mortality compared to immediate fascial closure. These findings do not support the blanket incorporation of delayed closure in mesenteric ischemia care or its previously advocated liberal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson A Proaño-Zamudio
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Dias Argandykov
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Angela Renne
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Anthony Gebran
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ander Dorken-Gallastegi
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Charudutt N Paranjape
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Haytham M A Kaafarani
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - David R King
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - George C Velmahos
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - John O Hwabejire
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rajabaleyan P, Jensen RO, Möller S, Qvist N, Ellebaek MB. Primary anastomosis and suturing combined with vacuum-assisted abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis due to perforation of the small intestine: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2023; 23:280. [PMID: 37715227 PMCID: PMC10503050 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02179-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal resection and a proximal stoma is the preferred surgical approach in patients with severe secondary peritonitis due to perforation of the small intestine. However, proximal stomas may result in significant nutritional problems and long-term parenteral nutrition. This study aimed to assess whether primary anastomosis or suturing of small intestine perforation is feasible and safe using the open abdomen principle with vacuum-assisted abdominal closure (VAC). METHODS Between January 2005 and June 2018, we performed a retrospective chart review of 20 patients (> 18 years) with diffuse faecal peritonitis caused by small intestinal perforation and treated with primary anastomosis/suturing and subsequent open abdomen with VAC. RESULTS The median age was 65 years (range: 23-90 years). Twelve patients were female (60%). Simple suturing of the small intestinal perforation was performed in three cases and intestinal resection with primary anastomosis in 17 cases. Four patients (20%) died within 90-days postoperatively. Leakage occurred in five cases (25%), and three patients developed an enteroatmospheric fistula (15%). Thirteen of 16 patients (83%) who survived were discharged without a stoma. The rest had a permanent stoma. CONCLUSIONS Primary suturing or resection with anastomosis and open abdomen with VAC in small intestinal perforation with severe faecal peritonitis is associated with a high rate of leakage and enteroatmospheric fistula formation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was approved by the Danish Patient Safety Authority (case number 3-3013-1555/1) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (file number 18/28,404). No funding was received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooya Rajabaleyan
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Rie Overgaard Jensen
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Niels Qvist
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mark Bremholm Ellebaek
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kirkpatrick AW, Coccolini F, Tolonen M, Minor S, Catena F, Gois E, Doig CJ, Hill MD, Ansaloni L, Chiarugi M, Tartaglia D, Ioannidis O, Sugrue M, Colak E, Hameed SM, Lampela H, Agnoletti V, McKee JL, Garraway N, Sartelli M, Ball CG, Parry NG, Voght K, Julien L, Kroeker J, Roberts DJ, Faris P, Tiruta C, Moore EE, Ammons LA, Anestiadou E, Bendinelli C, Bouliaris K, Carroll R, Ceresoli M, Favi F, Gurrado A, Rezende-Neto J, Isik A, Cremonini C, Strambi S, Koukoulis G, Testini M, Trpcic S, Pasculli A, Picariello E, Abu-Zidan F, Adeyeye A, Augustin G, Alconchel F, Altinel Y, Hernandez Amin LA, Aranda-Narváez JM, Baraket O, Biffl WL, Baiocchi GL, Bonavina L, Brisinda G, Cardinali L, Celotti A, Chaouch M, Chiarello M, Costa G, de'Angelis N, De Manzini N, Delibegovic S, Di Saverio S, De Simone B, Dubuisson V, Fransvea P, Garulli G, Giordano A, Gomes C, Hayati F, Huang J, Ibrahim AF, Huei TJ, Jailani RF, Khan M, Luna AP, Malbrain MLNG, Marwah S, McBeth P, Mihailescu A, Morello A, Mulita F, Murzi V, Mohammad AT, Parmar S, Pak A, Wong MPK, Pantalone D, Podda M, Puccioni C, Rasa K, Ren J, Roscio F, Gonzalez-Sanchez A, Sganga G, Scheiterle M, Slavchev M, Smirnov D, Tosi L, Trivedi A, Vega JAG, Waledziak M, Xenaki S, Winter D, Wu X, Zakaria AD, Zakaria Z. The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:33. [PMID: 37170123 PMCID: PMC10173926 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00500-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with negative peritoneal pressure therapy (NPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and attenuate the systemic damage from SCIAS, although there are definite risks of leaving the abdomen open whenever it might possibly be closed. This potential therapeutic paradigm is the rationale being assessed in the Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL trial) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ). Initially, the COOL trial received Industry sponsorship; however, this funding mandated the use of a specific trademarked and expensive NPPT device in half of the patients allocated to the intervention (open) arm. In August 2022, the 3 M/Acelity Corporation without consultation but within the terms of the contract canceled the financial support of the trial. Although creating financial difficulty, there is now no restriction on specific NPPT devices and removing a cost-prohibitive intervention creates an opportunity to expand the COOL trial to a truly global basis. This document describes the evolution of the COOL trial, with a focus on future opportunities for global growth of the study. METHODS The COOL trial is the largest prospective randomized controlled trial examining the random allocation of SCIAS patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or the use of the OA with an application of an NPPT dressing. Patients are eligible if they have free uncontained intraperitoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR severely adverse predicted clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is intended to definitively inform global practice by conclusively evaluating 90-day survival. Initial recruitment has been lower than hoped but satisfactory, and the COOL steering committee and trial investigators intend with increased global support to continue enrollment until recruitment ensures a definitive answer. DISCUSSION OA is mandated in many cases of SCIAS such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome associated with closure, or a planned second look as for example part of "damage control"; however, improved source control (locally and systemically) is the most uncertain indication for an OA. The COOL trial seeks to expand potential sites and proceed with the evaluation of NPPT agnostic to device, to properly examine the hypothesis that this treatment attenuates systemic damage and improves survival. This approach will not affect internal validity and should improve the external validity of any observed results of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION National Institutes of Health ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, EG23T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Samuel Minor
- Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Emanuel Gois
- Department of Surgery, Londrina State University, and National COOL Coordinator for Brazil, Londrina, Brazil
| | - Christopher J Doig
- Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery I, San Matteo Hospital Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Dario Tartaglia
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Orestis Ioannidis
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Elif Colak
- University of Samsun, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - S Morad Hameed
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hanna Lampela
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Espoo, Finland
| | | | - Jessica L McKee
- Global Project Manager, COOL Trial and the TeleMentored Ultrasound Supported Medical Interventions Research Group, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Naisan Garraway
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery, Macerata, Italy
| | - Chad G Ball
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Neil G Parry
- Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Voght
- Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Julien
- Department of Surgery, NSHA-Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jenna Kroeker
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek J Roberts
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Elissavet Anestiadou
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital "George Papanikolaou", Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Konstantinos Bouliaris
- General Surgery Department of Koutlimbaneio, Triantafylleio General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | | | - Marco Ceresoli
- General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesco Favi
- Chirurgia Generale E d'Urgenza, Ospedale M. Bufalini - Cesena, AUSL Della Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Joao Rezende-Neto
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arda Isik
- General Surgery Department, Istanbul Medeniyet University School of Medicine Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Camilla Cremonini
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Silivia Strambi
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Georgios Koukoulis
- General Surgery Department of Koutlimbaneio, Triantafylleio General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Sandy Trpcic
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alessandro Pasculli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery "V. Bonomo", University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Erika Picariello
- General Surgery Unit, Ospedale M. Buffalini Di Cesena, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ademola Adeyeye
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Afe Babalola University Multisystem Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
| | - Goran Augustin
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Felipe Alconchel
- Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital IMIB-Arrixaca, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, S/N, Murcia, Spain
| | - Yuksel Altinel
- Bagcilar Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Luz Adriana Hernandez Amin
- Nurse Master of Nursing, Professor and Coordinator of the teaching-service relationship, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sucre, Sincelejo, Colombia
| | - José Manuel Aranda-Narváez
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery Unit. General, Digestive and Transplantation Surgery Department, University Regional Hospital of Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, University of Milan Medical School, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Brisinda
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Cardinali
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Madonna del Soccorso, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Andrea Celotti
- General Surgery Unit, UO Chirurgia Generale - Ospedale Maggiore Di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Mohamed Chaouch
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Monastir University, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Maria Chiarello
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale Di Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Colorectal and Digestive Surgery Unit-DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital AP-HP, University Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Nicolo De Manzini
- Department of General Surgery, Cattinara University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Samir Delibegovic
- Department of Proctology, Clinic for Surgery, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, University Hospital of Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Regione Lombardia, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Unit of Digestive and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Clinique Saint Louis, Poissy, Poissy, Ile de France, France
- Unit of Emergency and General Surgery, Guastalla Hospital, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Guastalla, Italy
| | - Vincent Dubuisson
- Chirurgie Digestive, Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire Et, Générale University Hospital of Bordeaux FR, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Alessio Giordano
- Emergency and General Consultant Surgeon, Nuovo Ospedale "S. Stefano", Azienda ASL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Carlos Gomes
- Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitário Terezinha de Jesus, SUPREMA, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Jinjian Huang
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | | | | | | | - Mansoor Khan
- General Surgery, University Hospitals, Sussex, UK
| | | | - Manu L N G Malbrain
- First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
- International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium
| | - Sanjay Marwah
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | | | | | - Alessia Morello
- Department of General Surgery, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital - San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy, Italy
| | - Francesk Mulita
- Department of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Greece
| | - Valentina Murzi
- Department of Surgical Science, Cagliari State University, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | | | - Ajay Pak
- Department of General Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, India
| | - Michael Pak-Kai Wong
- School of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | | | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Caterina Puccioni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Kemal Rasa
- Department of General Surgery, Hüseyin Kemal Raşa, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Jianan Ren
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Francesco Roscio
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Antonio Gonzalez-Sanchez
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery Unit. General, Digestive and Transplantation Surgery Department, University Regional Hospital of Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maximilian Scheiterle
- Emergency Surgery Unit and Trauma Team, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Dmitry Smirnov
- Department of Surgery, South Ural State Medical University, Chelyabinsk City, Russia
| | - Lorenzo Tosi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sofia Xenaki
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Xiuwen Wu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Andee Dzulkarnean Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences and Hospital USM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Georgetown, Malaysia
| | - Zaidi Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences and Hospital USM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Georgetown, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vacuum-assisted laparostomy in severe abdominal trauma and urgent abdominal pathology with compartment syndrome, peritonitis and sepsis: Comparison with other options for multistage surgical treatment (systematic review and meta-analysis). ACTA BIOMEDICA SCIENTIFICA 2023. [DOI: 10.29413/abs.2023-8.1.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. The concept of multistage surgical treatment of patients has been established in surgery rather recently and therefore the discussions on the expediency of using a particular surgical technique in a specific situation still continue. Vacuum-assisted laparostomy is being widely implemented into clinical practice for the treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome, severe peritonitis and abdominal trauma, but the indications and advantages of this method are not clearly defined yet.The aim of the study. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the comparison of the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted laparostomy with various variants of relaparotomy and laparostomy without negative pressure therapy in the treatment of patients with urgent abdominal pathology and abdominal trauma complicated by widespread peritonitis, sepsis or compartment syndrome.Material and methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses”. We carried out the analysis of non-randomized (since January 2007 until August 6, 2022) and randomized (without time limits for the start of the study and until August 6, 2022) studies from the electronic databases eLibrary, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar Search, Mendeley.Results. Vacuum-assisted laparostomy causes statistically significant shortening of the time of treatment of patients in the ICU and in hospital and a decrease in postoperative mortality compared to other variants of laparostomy without vacuum assistance.Conclusion. To obtain data of a higher level of evidence and higher grade of recommendations, it is necessary to further conduct systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on randomized clinical studies.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rajabaleyan P, Michelsen J, Tange Holst U, Möller S, Toft P, Luxhøi J, Buyukuslu M, Bohm AM, Borly L, Sandblom G, Kobborg M, Aagaard Poulsen K, Schou Løve U, Ovesen S, Grant Sølling C, Mørch Søndergaard B, Lund Lomholt M, Ritz Møller D, Qvist N, Bremholm Ellebæk M. Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. World J Emerg Surg 2022; 17:25. [PMID: 35619144 PMCID: PMC9137120 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Secondary peritonitis is a severe condition with a 20–32% reported mortality. The accepted treatment modalities are vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand (ROD). However, no randomised controlled trial has been completed to compare the two methods potential benefits and disadvantages. Methods This study will be a randomised controlled multicentre trial, including patients aged 18 years or older with purulent or faecal peritonitis confined to at least two of the four abdominal quadrants originating from the small intestine, colon, or rectum. Randomisation will be web-based to either primary closure with ROD or VAC in blocks of 2, 4, and 6. The primary endpoint is peritonitis-related complications within 30 or 90 days and one year after index operation. Secondary outcomes are comprehensive complication index (CCI) and mortality after 30 or 90 days and one year; quality of life assessment by (SF-36) after three and 12 months, the development of incisional hernia after 12 months assessed by clinical examination and CT-scanning and healthcare resource utilisation. With an estimated superiority of 15% in the primary outcome for VAC, 340 patients must be included. Hospitals in Denmark and Europe will be invited to participate. Discussion There is no robust evidence for choosing either open abdomen with VAC treatment or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis. The present study has the potential to answer this important clinical question. Trial Registration The study protocol has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03932461). Protocol version 1.0, 9 January 2022. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooya Rajabaleyan
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Jens Michelsen
- Research Unit for Anaesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Uffe Tange Holst
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Palle Toft
- Research Unit for Anaesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan Luxhøi
- Surgical Department, Hospital of Southwest Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Musa Buyukuslu
- Surgical Department, Hospital of Southwest Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Borly
- Surgical Department, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | | | | | - Kristian Aagaard Poulsen
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Sophie Ovesen
- Surgical Department, Viborg Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Niels Qvist
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
- Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Akbayir O, Ulukent SC, Guraslan H, Seyhan NA, Gunkaya OS, Cingillioglu B, Akturk E, Yuksel IT. Open abdomen technique used in complications of major gynecological oncology surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48:1904-1912. [PMID: 35596265 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the open abdomen technique (laparostomy) used in complications of major gynecological oncology surgery. METHODS We analyzed retrospectively the surgical database of all patients who had undergone major open surgery by the same gynecologic oncologist over a 5-year period. All patients who had had open abdomen procedure were identified; demographic data and indications of primary surgery, temporary abdominal closure procedure details, fascia closure and morbidity, mortality rates were evaluated. Intraabdominal infection and intraoperative massive hemorrhage were the major indications for all open abdomen cases. Mannheim Peritonitis Index was used perioperatively to determine open abdomen decision in intraabdominal infections. Vacuum Assisted Abdominal Closure system and Bogota Bag were used for temporary abdominal closure techniques. RESULTS Out of the total 560 patients who had undergone major oncological surgery, 19 patients (3.3%) had open abdomen procedure due to surgical complications. Eleven patients had intraabdominal infection, six patients had hemodynamic instability due to peri and postoperative hemorrhage, two patients had gross fecal contamination during posterior pelvic exenteration surgery. The fascia was closed totally in 15 (78%), partially in 3 (15%) and could not be closed in 1 patient who had died secondary to multiorgan failure. Total morbidity and mortality rates were 26% (5/19) (two intrabdominal abscess, one pulmonary embolism, one skin necrosis, one enteroatmospheric fistula) and 5.2% (1/19) respectively. CONCLUSION Open abdomen is a life-saving procedure when applied with correct indications and timing. Gynecological oncologic surgeries are candidates to serious complications and gynecologic oncologists dealing with such surgery should be as experienced as general surgeons in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozgur Akbayir
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Suat C Ulukent
- Department of General Surgery, Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hakan Guraslan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Niyazi A Seyhan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
| | - Osman S Gunkaya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Basak Cingillioglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Erhan Akturk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ilkbal T Yuksel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Effect of Antibiotic Duration in Emergency General Surgery Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infection Managed with Open vs Closed Abdomen. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:419-427. [PMID: 35290260 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on duration of antibiotics in patients managed with an open abdomen (OA) due to intra-abdominal infection (IAI) are scarce. We hypothesized that patients with IAI managed with OA rather than closed abdomen (CA) would have higher rates of secondary infections (SIs) independent of the duration of the antibiotic treatment. METHODS This was an observational, prospective, multicenter, international study of patients with IAI requiring laparotomy for source control. Demographic and antibiotic duration values were collected. Primary outcomes were SI (surgical site, bloodstream, pneumonia, urinary tract) and mortality. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, chi-square/Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression. RESULTS Twenty-one centers contributed 752 patients. The average age was 59.6 years, 43.6% were women, and 43.9% were managed with OA. Overall mortality was 16.1%, with higher rates among OA patients (31.6% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001). OA patients had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (4.7 vs 1.8, p < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (3.6 vs 2.7, p < 0.001), and APACHE II scores (16.1 vs 9.4, p < 0.001). The mean duration of antibiotics was 6.5 days (8.0 OA vs 5.4 CA, p < 0.001). A total of 179 (23.8%) patients developed SI (33.1% OA vs 16.8% CA, p < 0.001). Longer antibiotic duration was associated with increased rates of SI: 1 to 2 days, 15.8%; 3 to 5 days, 20.4%; 6 to 14 days, 26.6%; and more than 14 days, 46.8% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with IAI managed with OA had higher rates of SI and increased mortality compared with CA. A prolonged duration of antibiotics was associated with increased rates of SI. Increased antibiotic duration is not associated with improved outcomes in patients with IAI and OA.
Collapse
|
11
|
Napolitano LM. Intra-abdominal Infections. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 43:10-27. [PMID: 35172355 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are a common cause of sepsis, and frequently occur in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. IAIs include many diagnoses, including peritonitis, cholangitis, diverticulitis, pancreatitis, abdominal abscess, intestinal perforation, abdominal trauma, and pelvic inflammatory disease. IAIs are the second most common cause of infectious morbidity and mortality in the ICU after pneumonia. IAIs are also the second most common cause of sepsis in critically ill patients, and affect approximately 5% of ICU patients. Mortality with IAI in ICU patients ranges from 5 to 50%, with the wide variability related to the specific IAI present, associated patient comorbidities, severity of illness, and organ dysfunction and failures. It is important to have a comprehensive understanding of IAIs as potential causes of life-threatening infections in ICU patients to provide the best diagnostic and therapeutic care for optimal patient outcomes in the ICU.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cristaudo AT, Hitos K, Gunnarsson R, Decosta A. Development and validation of a multivariable prediction model in open abdomen patients for entero-atmospheric fistula. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:1079-1084. [PMID: 35119771 PMCID: PMC9303347 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparostomy or Open Abdomen (OA) has matured into an effective strategy in the management of abdominal catastrophe. Single prognostic factors have been identified in a previous systematic review regarding entero-atmospheric fistula (EAF). Unfortunately, no prognostic multivariable model for EAF exist. The aim was to develop and validate a multivariable prediction model from a retrospective cohort study involving three hospital's databases. METHODS Fifty-seven variables were evaluated to develop a multivariable model. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for on a developmental data set from two hospitals. Receiver operator characteristics analysis with area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed on the developmental data set (internal validation) as well as on an additional validation data set from another hospital (external validation). RESULTS Five-hundred and forty-eight patients managed with an OA. Two variables remained in the multivariable prediction model for EAF. The AUC for EAF on internal validation were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67-0.92) on external validation. CONCLUSIONS A multivariable prediction model for EAF was externally validated and an easy-to-use probability nomogram was constructed using the two predictor variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III; prognostic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam T Cristaudo
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Westmead Research Centre for Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Kerry Hitos
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Westmead Research Centre for Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Ronny Gunnarsson
- General Practice / Family medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Research, Education, Development & Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Götaland, Sweden.,Primary Health Care Clinic for Homeless People, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alan Decosta
- College of Medicine & Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lebedev NV, Popov VS, Klimov AE, Svanadze GT. [Eritonitis outcome prediction]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2021:92-98. [PMID: 34941215 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202112192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The review is devoted to the most common general clinical and specific grading systems for peritonitis outcome prediction. Particular attention is paid to methodological approaches, prediction reliability, simplicity of use in clinical practice and their importance in decision-making. It is shown that none of the modern grading systems is universal and absolutely reliable. Combining several systems is quite difficult and will take additional time that is impossible for intraoperative environment. Despite various systems for peritonitis outcome prediction, none of them can completely satisfy surgeons, primarily in choice of surgical access, intervention type and option for its completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N V Lebedev
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - V S Popov
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - A E Klimov
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - G T Svanadze
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Management of the patient with the open abdomen. Curr Opin Crit Care 2021; 27:726-732. [PMID: 34561356 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to outline the management of the patient with the open abdomen. RECENT FINDINGS An open abdomen approach is used after damage control laparotomy, to decrease risk for postsurgery intra-abdominal hypertension, if reoperation is likely and after primary abdominal decompression.Temporary abdominal wall closure without negative pressure is associated with higher rates of intra-abdominal infection and evisceration. Negative pressure systems improve fascial closure rates but increase fistula formation. Definitive abdominal wall closure should be considered once oedema has subsided and the patient has stabilized. Delayed abdominal closure after trauma (>24-48 h) is associated with less achievement of fascial closure and more complications. Protective lung ventilation should be employed early, particularly if respiratory compromise is evident. Conservative fluid management and less sedation may decrease delirium and increase definitive abdominal closure rates. Extubation may be performed before definitive abdominal closure in selected patients. Antibiotic therapy should be brief, targeted and guideline concordant. Survival depends on the underlying disease, the closure method and the course of hospitalization. SUMMARY Changes in the treatment of patients with the open abdomen include negative temporary closure, conservative fluid management, early protective lung ventilation, decreased sedation and extubation before abdominal closure in selected patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Faes S, Hübner M, Girardin T, Demartines N, Hahnloser D. Rate of stoma formation following damage-control surgery for severe intra-abdominal sepsis: a single-centre consecutive case series. BJS Open 2021; 5:6423702. [PMID: 34750614 PMCID: PMC8576255 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) is associated with high mortality and stoma rates. A two-stage approach with initial damage-control surgery (DCS) and subsequent reconstruction might decrease stoma and mortality rates but requires standardization. Methods A standardized two-stage damage-control algorithm for IAS was implemented in April 2016 and applied systematically. Results Some 203 consecutive patients (median age 70 years, 62 per cent ASA score greater than 3) had DCS for severe IAS. Median operation time was 82 minutes, 60 per cent performed during night-time. Median intraoperative noradrenaline doses were 20 (i.q.r. 26) µg/min and blood gas analysis (ABG) was abnormal (metabolic acidosis) in 90 per cent of patients. The second-stage operation allowed definitive surgery in 76 per cent of patients, 24 per cent had up to four re-DCSs until definitive surgery. The in-hospital mortality rate was 26 per cent. At hospital discharge, 65 per cent of patients were stoma free. Risk factors for in-hospital death were noradrenaline (odds ratio 4.25 (95 per cent c.i. 1.72 to 12.83)), abnormal ABG (pH: odds ratio 2.72 (1.24 to 6.65); lactate: odds ratio 6.77 (3.20 to 15.78)), male gender (odds ratio 2.40 (1.24 to 4.85)), ASA score greater than 3 (odds ratio 5.75 (2.58 to 14.68)), mesenteric ischaemia (odds ratio 3.27 (1.71 to 6.46)) and type of resection (odds ratio 2.95 (1.24 to 8.21)). Risk factors for stoma at discharge were ASA score greater than 3 (odds ratio 2.76 (95 per cent c.i. 1.38 to 5.73)), type of resection (odds ratio 30.91 (6.29 to 559.3)) and longer operation time (odds ratio 2.441 (1.22 to 5.06)). Conclusion Initial DCS followed by secondary reconstruction of bowel continuity for IAS within 48 hours in a tertiary teaching hospital was feasible and safe, following a clear algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seraina Faes
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Timothée Girardin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Dieter Hahnloser
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith MTD, Clarke DL. Staged laparotomy for acute non-traumatic intra-abdominal emergencies in a tertiary South African unit. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:2637-2643. [PMID: 34636467 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients undergoing laparotomy for emergency general surgery (EGS) have poor outcomes. Attempts have been made to improve these outcomes by adopting damage control principles known to benefit polytraumatized patients. Studies describing the use of staged laparotomy (SL) in EGS have been modest in size and heterogenous. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with SL at a tertiary hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. METHODS The Hybrid Electronic Medical Registry (HEMR) at Greys Hospital was interrogated for all consecutive admissions undergoing staged EGS laparotomy. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. RESULTS From 2012 to 2018, 242 patients (16.5% of all EGS laparotomies) underwent SL for an EGS condition. The median patient age was 38 years old (IQR 27-56 years). Physiological indications were present in 125 patients (51.7%) and non-physiological indications (NPI) in 117 (48.3%). Haemodynamic instability was the most common physiological indication (51; 21.1%) and gross contamination was the most non-physiological indication (91; 37.6%). Adverse event and mortality rates were 84.8% and 26.9%, respectively. Independent predictors of mortality were enteric breach (OR3.9; 95% CI (2.1-7.8)), physiological indication (OR 2.1; 95% CI (1.1-3.7)) and anastomosis (OR 2.0; 1.05-3.73). "Clip and drop" did not contribute to mortality (P = 0.43; OR1.34 (0.64-2.7)). Mortality was higher in the group without repeat laparotomy. Mortality rate was not associated with increasing number of relaparotomies. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing EGS laparotomy form a high-risk group. "Clip and drop" approach and number of relaparotomies were not associated with mortality. Indications and components of this approach need to be standardized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle T D Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| | - Damian L Clarke
- Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Kluger Y, Agastra E, Abu-Zidan FM, Abbas AES, Ansaloni L, Adesunkanmi AK, Atanasov B, Augustin G, Bala M, Baraket O, Baral S, Biffl WL, Boermeester MA, Ceresoli M, Cerutti E, Chiara O, Cicuttin E, Chiarugi M, Coimbra R, Colak E, Corsi D, Cortese F, Cui Y, Damaskos D, de’ Angelis N, Delibegovic S, Demetrashvili Z, De Simone B, de Jonge SW, Dhingra S, Di Bella S, Di Marzo F, Di Saverio S, Dogjani A, Duane TM, Enani MA, Fugazzola P, Galante JM, Gachabayov M, Ghnnam W, Gkiokas G, Gomes CA, Griffiths EA, Hardcastle TC, Hecker A, Herzog T, Kabir SMU, Karamarkovic A, Khokha V, Kim PK, Kim JI, Kirkpatrick AW, Kong V, Koshy RM, Kryvoruchko IA, Inaba K, Isik A, Iskandar K, Ivatury R, Labricciosa FM, Lee YY, Leppäniemi A, Litvin A, Luppi D, Machain GM, Maier RV, Marinis A, Marmorale C, Marwah S, Mesina C, Moore EE, Moore FA, Negoi I, Olaoye I, Ordoñez CA, Ouadii M, Peitzman AB, Perrone G, Pikoulis M, Pintar T, Pipitone G, Podda M, Raşa K, Ribeiro J, Rodrigues G, Rubio-Perez I, Sall I, Sato N, Sawyer RG, Segovia Lohse H, Sganga G, Shelat VG, Stephens I, Sugrue M, Tarasconi A, Tochie JN, Tolonen M, Tomadze G, Ulrych J, Vereczkei A, Viaggi B, Gurioli C, Casella C, Pagani L, Baiocchi GL, Catena F. WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST global clinical pathways for patients with intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:49. [PMID: 34563232 PMCID: PMC8467193 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00387-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and have been reported as major contributors to non-trauma deaths in hospitals worldwide. The cornerstones of effective treatment of IAIs include early recognition, adequate source control, appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and prompt physiologic stabilization using a critical care environment, combined with an optimal surgical approach. Together, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery (GAIS), the Surgical Infection Society-Europe (SIS-E), the World Surgical Infection Society (WSIS), and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) have jointly completed an international multi-society document in order to facilitate clinical management of patients with IAIs worldwide building evidence-based clinical pathways for the most common IAIs. An extensive non-systematic review was conducted using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases, limited to the English language. The resulting information was shared by an international task force from 46 countries with different clinical backgrounds. The aim of the document is to promote global standards of care in IAIs providing guidance to clinicians by describing reasonable approaches to the management of IAIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Sartelli
- Department of Surgery Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Yoram Kluger
- grid.413731.30000 0000 9950 8111Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ervis Agastra
- General Surgery Department, Regional Hospital of Durres, Durres, Albania
| | - Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
- grid.43519.3a0000 0001 2193 6666Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ashraf El Sayed Abbas
- grid.469958.fDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Abdulrashid Kayode Adesunkanmi
- grid.10824.3f0000 0001 2183 9444Department of Surgery, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Osun State, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Boyko Atanasov
- grid.35371.330000 0001 0726 0380Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Plovdiv, UMHAT Eurohospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Goran Augustin
- grid.412688.10000 0004 0397 9648Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Miklosh Bala
- grid.17788.310000 0001 2221 2926Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Oussama Baraket
- grid.12574.350000000122959819Department of general surgery Bizerte hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Suman Baral
- Department of Surgery, Lumbini Medical College and Teaching Hospital Ltd., Palpa, Tansen, Nepal
| | - Walter L. Biffl
- grid.415401.5Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754Emergency and General Surgery Department, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cerutti
- grid.415845.9Anesthesia and Transplant Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- grid.416200.1Emergency Department, Niguarda Ca’Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- grid.144189.10000 0004 1756 8209Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raul Coimbra
- grid.43582.380000 0000 9852 649XRiverside University Health System, CECORC Research Center, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, USA
| | - Elif Colak
- Department of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Daniela Corsi
- General Direction, Area Vasta 3, ASUR Marche, Macerata, Italy
| | | | - Yunfeng Cui
- grid.265021.20000 0000 9792 1228Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Dimitris Damaskos
- grid.418716.d0000 0001 0709 1919Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nicola de’ Angelis
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery Unit, Regional General Hospital F. Miulli, Bari, Italy
- grid.410511.00000 0001 2149 7878Université Paris Est, UPEC, Creteil, France
| | - Samir Delibegovic
- grid.412410.20000 0001 0682 9061Department of Surgery, University Clinical Center of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Zaza Demetrashvili
- Department General Surgery, Kipshidze Central University Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Belinda De Simone
- grid.418056.e0000 0004 1765 2558Department of general, Digestive and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal De Poissy/St Germain en Laye, Poissy, France
| | - Stijn W. de Jonge
- grid.415401.5Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA USA
| | - Sameer Dhingra
- grid.464629.b0000 0004 1775 2698Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, Bihar India
| | - Stefano Di Bella
- grid.5133.40000 0001 1941 4308Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health sciences, Trieste University, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Salomone Di Saverio
- grid.412972.bDepartment of General Surgery, University of Insubria, University Hospital of Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Regione Lombardia, Varese, Italy
| | - Agron Dogjani
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Trauma, Tirana, Albania
| | - Therese M. Duane
- grid.429044.f0000 0004 0402 1407Department of Surgery, Texas Health Resources, Fort Worth, TX USA
| | - Mushira Abdulaziz Enani
- grid.415277.20000 0004 0593 1832Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Division, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- grid.8982.b0000 0004 1762 5736Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Joseph M. Galante
- grid.27860.3b0000 0004 1936 9684Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA USA
| | - Mahir Gachabayov
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Vladimir City Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medicine, Vladimir, Russia
| | - Wagih Ghnnam
- grid.10251.370000000103426662Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - George Gkiokas
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 0800Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitário Terezinha de Jesus, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | - Ewen A. Griffiths
- grid.412563.70000 0004 0376 6589Department of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Timothy C. Hardcastle
- Trauma Service, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital and Department of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, Durban, South Africa
| | - Andreas Hecker
- grid.411067.50000 0000 8584 9230Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Torsten Herzog
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XDepartment of Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Syed Mohammad Umar Kabir
- grid.415900.90000 0004 0617 6488Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Aleksandar Karamarkovic
- grid.7149.b0000 0001 2166 9385Surgical Clinic “Nikola Spasic”, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - Peter K. Kim
- grid.251993.50000000121791997Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Jae Il Kim
- grid.411612.10000 0004 0470 5112Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
- grid.414959.40000 0004 0469 2139General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Victor Kong
- grid.414386.c0000 0004 0576 7753Department of Surgery, Edendale Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| | - Renol M. Koshy
- grid.412570.50000 0004 0400 5079Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Igor A. Kryvoruchko
- grid.412081.eDepartment of Surgery #2, National Medical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Kenji Inaba
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Arda Isik
- grid.411776.20000 0004 0454 921XDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Katia Iskandar
- grid.444421.30000 0004 0417 6142Department of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rao Ivatury
- grid.224260.00000 0004 0458 8737Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA USA
| | | | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- grid.11875.3a0000 0001 2294 3534School of Medical Sciences, Universitiy Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan Malaysia
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrey Litvin
- grid.410686.d0000 0001 1018 9204Department of Surgical Disciplines, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Regional Clinical Hospital, Kaliningrad, Russia
| | - Davide Luppi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, ASMN, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Gustavo M. Machain
- grid.412213.70000 0001 2289 5077Department of Surgery, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion, Asuncion, Paraguay
| | - Ronald V. Maier
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Athanasios Marinis
- grid.417374.2First Department of Surgery, Tzaneion General Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Cristina Marmorale
- grid.7010.60000 0001 1017 3210Department of Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Sanjay Marwah
- grid.412572.70000 0004 1771 1642Department of Surgery, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, India
| | - Cristian Mesina
- Second Surgical Clinic, Emergency Hospital of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Ernest E. Moore
- grid.239638.50000 0001 0369 638XErnest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, USA
| | - Frederick A. Moore
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, and Center for Sepsis and Critical Illness Research, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Ionut Negoi
- Department of Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Iyiade Olaoye
- grid.412975.c0000 0000 8878 5287Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria
| | - Carlos A. Ordoñez
- grid.477264.4Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fundacion Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia
- grid.8271.c0000 0001 2295 7397Department of Surgery, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - Mouaqit Ouadii
- grid.412817.9Department of Surgery, Hassan II University Hospital, Medical School of Fez, Sidi Mohamed Benabdellah University, Fez, Morocco
| | - Andrew B. Peitzman
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Gennaro Perrone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 08003rd Department of Surgery, Attiko Hospital, MSc “Global Health-Disaster Medicine”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Tadeja Pintar
- grid.29524.380000 0004 0571 7705Department of Surgery, UMC Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Giuseppe Pipitone
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases - INMI - Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- grid.7763.50000 0004 1755 3242Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Kemal Raşa
- Department of Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Julival Ribeiro
- grid.414433.5Infection Control, Hospital de Base, Brasília, DF Brazil
| | - Gabriel Rodrigues
- grid.411639.80000 0001 0571 5193Department of General Surgery, Kasturba Medical College & Hospital, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Ines Rubio-Perez
- grid.81821.320000 0000 8970 9163General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- General Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Norio Sato
- grid.255464.40000 0001 1011 3808Department of Aeromedical Services for Emergency and Trauma Care, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Robert G. Sawyer
- grid.268187.20000 0001 0672 1122Department of Surgery, Western Michigan University School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI USA
| | - Helmut Segovia Lohse
- grid.412213.70000 0001 2289 5077Department of Surgery, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion, Asuncion, Paraguay
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- grid.414603.4Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Emergency Surgery & Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vishal G. Shelat
- grid.240988.fDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Stephens
- grid.415900.90000 0004 0617 6488Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Michael Sugrue
- grid.415900.90000 0004 0617 6488Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Antonio Tarasconi
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Joel Noutakdie Tochie
- grid.412661.60000 0001 2173 8504Department of Emergency medicine, Anesthesiology and critical care, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Matti Tolonen
- grid.15485.3d0000 0000 9950 5666Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Gia Tomadze
- grid.412274.60000 0004 0428 8304Surgery Department, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Jan Ulrych
- grid.411798.20000 0000 9100 9940First Department of Surgery, Department of Abdominal, Thoracic Surgery and Traumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andras Vereczkei
- grid.9679.10000 0001 0663 9479Department of Surgery, Clinical Center University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Bruno Viaggi
- grid.24704.350000 0004 1759 9494Department of Anesthesiology, Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Florence Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Gurioli
- Department of Surgery, Camerino Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Claudio Casella
- grid.7637.50000000417571846Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Leonardo Pagani
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Surgery, AAST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
- grid.7637.50000000417571846Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abebe K, Geremew B, Lemmu B, Abebe E. Indications and Outcome of Patients who had Re-Laparotomy: Two Years' Experience from a Teaching Hospital in a Developing Nation. Ethiop J Health Sci 2021; 30:739-744. [PMID: 33911835 PMCID: PMC8047254 DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i5.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Complications from abdominal surgery may necessitate a second or more surgeries, re-laparotomy. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Data on relaparotomy from the developing nations is limited. This study aims to assess the indications and outcome of patients who had relaparotomy. Methods A retrospective review of medical records of all patients who underwent Re-laparotomy at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College from January 2016 to December 2017 was done. Result Of 2146 laparotomies, 6.9% (149) needed re-laparotomy and 129 patients were analyzed. Most (123,95.3%) had on-demand re-laparotomy. Patients operated on emergency made 70.5% (91) of the cases making the ratio of emergency to elective surgery 2.4:1. The three most common surgeries that needed re-laparotomy were, Perforated appendicitis (35,27.1%), bowel obstructions (28,21.7%) , and trauma (20,13.4%). The most common indications for relaparotomy were intra-abdominal abscess (57,44.23%), wound dehiscence (17,13.2%) and anastomotic leak (15 ,11.6%). Surgical site infection (128,100%) and malnutrition (58,45%) were the leading complications. The overall mortality rate was 12.8 % (19). There was no statically significant difference in mortality rate between on-demand and planned re-laparotomy (P=0.388), urgency of the primary surgery (P=0.891) and the number of relaparotomy (p=0.629). Re-laparotomy for anastomotic leak (p=0.001) and patients above fifty years of age (P=0.015) had significant associations with mortality. Conclusion Intra-abdominal abscess collection, wound dehiscence and anastomotic leak were the most common indications of re-laparotomies. Age above fifty years and anastomotic leaks were significantly associated with mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirubel Abebe
- Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Befekadu Lemmu
- Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Engida Abebe
- Department of Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infection is the second most common cause of sepsis, and the mortality rate from abdominal sepsis remains high. High molecular weight (HMW) hyaluronic acid (HA) has been studied in sterile injury models as an anti-inflammatory and anti-permeability agent. This study evaluated the therapeutic effects of intraperitoneal HMW HA administration in mice with peritonitis-induced sepsis. Sepsis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), followed 4 h later by an intraperitoneal injection of HMW HA (20 mg/kg) solution or phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Survival, physiological data, organ injury, bacterial burden, and inflammatory cytokine levels were assessed in the CLP mice. To assess the effect of HA on macrophage phagocytosis activity, RAW264.7 cells, primed with lipopolysaccharide, were exposed with either PBS or HMW HA (500 μg/mL) prior to exposure to 10 CFU of E coli bacteria. HMW HA instillation significantly improved blood oxygenation, lung histology, and survival in CLP mice. Inflammatory cytokine levels in the plasma and bacterial burdens in the lung and spleen were significantly decreased by HA administration at 24 h after CLP. At 6 h after CLP, HA significantly decreased bacterial burden in the peritoneal lavage fluid. HMW HA administration significantly increased E coli bacterial phagocytosis by RAW264.7 cells in part through increased phosphorylation of ezrin/radixin/moesin, a known downstream target of CD44 (a HA receptor); ezrin inhibition abolished the enhanced phagocytosis by RAW264.7 cells induced by HA. Intraperitoneal administration of HMW HA had therapeutic effects against CLP-induced sepsis in terms of suppressing inflammation and increasing antimicrobial activity.
Collapse
|
20
|
Outcome in patients with open abdomen treatment for peritonitis: a multidomain approach outperforms single domain predictions. J Clin Monit Comput 2021; 36:1109-1119. [PMID: 34247307 PMCID: PMC9294021 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00743-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Numerous patient-related clinical parameters and treatment-specific variables have been identified as causing or contributing to the severity of peritonitis. We postulated that a combination of clinical and surgical markers and scoring systems would outperform each of these predictors in isolation. To investigate this hypothesis, we developed a multivariable model to examine whether survival outcome can reliably be predicted in peritonitis patients treated with open abdomen. This single-center retrospective analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression modeling in combination with repeated random sub-sampling validation to examine the predictive capabilities of domain-specific predictors (i.e., demography, physiology, surgery). We analyzed data of 1,351 consecutive adult patients (55.7% male) who underwent open abdominal surgery in the study period (January 1998 to December 2018). Core variables included demographics, clinical scores, surgical indices and indicators of organ dysfunction, peritonitis index, incision type, fascia closure, wound healing, and fascial dehiscence. Postoperative complications were also added when available. A multidomain peritonitis prediction model (MPPM) was constructed to bridge the mortality predictions from individual domains (demographic, physiological and surgical). The MPPM is based on data of n = 597 patients, features high predictive capabilities (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.87 (0.85 to 0.90, 95% CI)) and is well calibrated. The surgical predictor “skin closure” was found to be the most important predictor of survival in our cohort, closely followed by the two physiological predictors SAPS-II and MPI. Marginal effects plots highlight the effect of individual outcomes on the prediction of survival outcome in patients undergoing staged laparotomies for treatment of peritonitis. Although most single indices exhibited moderate performance, we observed that the predictive performance was markedly increased when an integrative prediction model was applied. Our proposed MPPM integrative prediction model may outperform the predictive power of current models.
Collapse
|
21
|
Marques HS, Araújo GRL, da Silva FAF, de Brito BB, Versiani PVD, Caires JS, Milet TDC, de Melo FF. Tertiary peritonitis: A disease that should not be ignored. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:2160-2169. [PMID: 33869592 PMCID: PMC8026831 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i10.2160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infections can be classified into uncomplicated or complicated (peritonitis). Peritonitis is divided into primary, secondary, and tertiary. Tertiary peritonitis is the less common but the most severe among peritonitis stratifications, being defined as a recurrent intra-abdominal infection that occurs 48 h after a well-succeeded control of a secondary peritonitis. This disease has a complex pathogenesis that is closely related to the capacity of the peritoneal cavity to activate immunological processes. Patients who progress to persistent peritonitis are at an increased risk of developing several infectious complications such as sepsis and multiple organ failure syndrome. Moreover, tertiary peritonitis remains an important cause of hospital death mainly among patients with associated risk factors. The microbiological profile of organisms causing tertiary peritonitis is often different from that observed in other types of peritonitis. In addition, there is a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant pathogens causing this condition, and an appropriate and successful clinical management depends on an early diagnosis, which can be made easier with the use of clinical scores presenting a good prediction value during the intensive care unit admission. Complementarily, immediate therapy should be performed to control the infectious focus and to prevent new recurrences. In this sense, the treatment is based on initial antimicrobial therapy and well-performed peritoneal drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Santos Marques
- Campus Vitória da Conquista, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45083-900, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Glauber Rocha Lima Araújo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Breno Bittencourt de Brito
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Paulo Victor Dias Versiani
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Jaqueline Silva Caires
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Geral de Vitória da Conquista, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Thiago de Carvalho Milet
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Geral de Vitória da Conquista, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Fabrício Freire de Melo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista 45029-094, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sartelli M, Ansaloni L, Bartoletti M, Catena F, Cardi M, Cortese F, Di Marzo F, Pea F, Plebani M, Rossolini GM, Sganga G, Viaggi B, Viale P. The role of procalcitonin in reducing antibiotics across the surgical pathway. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:15. [PMID: 33761972 PMCID: PMC7988639 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00357-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Procalcitonin (PCT) is widely considered as a highly sensitive biomarker of bacterial infection, offering general and emergency surgeons a key tool in the management of surgical infections. A multidisciplinary task force of experts met in Bologna, Italy, on April 4, 2019, to clarify the key issues in the use of PCT across the surgical pathway. The panelists presented the statements developed for each of the main questions regarding the use of PCT across the surgical pathway. An agreement on the statements was reached by the Delphi method, and this document reports the executive summary of the final recommendations approved by the expert panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michele Bartoletti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Infectious Disease Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cardi
- Department of Surgery, “P. Valdoni” Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cortese
- Department of Emergency Surgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Federico Pea
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Medicine, Laboratory Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Rossolini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Clinical Microbiology and Virology Unit, Florence Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Viaggi
- Neurointensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Infectious Disease Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Miller AS, Boyce K, Box B, Clarke MD, Duff SE, Foley NM, Guy RJ, Massey LH, Ramsay G, Slade DAJ, Stephenson JA, Tozer PJ, Wright D. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:476-547. [PMID: 33470518 PMCID: PMC9291558 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is a requirement for an expansive and up to date review of the management of emergency colorectal conditions seen in adults. The primary objective is to provide detailed evidence-based guidelines for the target audience of general and colorectal surgeons who are responsible for an adult population and who practise in Great Britain and Ireland. METHODS Surgeons who are elected members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Emergency Surgery Subcommittee were invited to contribute various sections to the guidelines. They were directed to produce a pathology-based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence-based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after two votes were included in the guidelines. RESULTS All aspects of care (excluding abdominal trauma) for emergency colorectal conditions have been included along with 122 recommendations for management. CONCLUSION These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence-based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of emergency colorectal conditions and should serve as practical text for clinicians managing colorectal conditions in the emergency setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S. Miller
- Leicester Royal InfirmaryUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustLeicesterUK
| | | | - Benjamin Box
- Northumbria Healthcare Foundation NHS TrustNorth ShieldsUK
| | | | - Sarah E. Duff
- Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Phil J. Tozer
- St Mark’s Hospital and Imperial College LondonHarrowUK
| | - Danette Wright
- Western Sydney Local Health DistrictSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Okishio Y, Ueda K, Nasu T, Kawashima S, Kunitatsu K, Kato S. Is open abdominal management useful in nontrauma emergency surgery for older adults? A single-center retrospective study. Surg Today 2021; 51:1285-1291. [PMID: 33420826 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02214-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Open abdominal management (OAM) is being adopted increasingly frequently in nontrauma patients. This study assessed the effectiveness of OAM in nontrauma older adults. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all adults who underwent nontrauma emergency laparotomy requiring postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) management between September 2012 and August 2017 at our hospital. Patients ≥ 80 years old, who underwent OAM, were compared with those < 80 years old. The primary outcome was the 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were the 30-day mortality, unplanned relaparotomy, and the ICU length of stay (LOS). RESULTS The OAM group comprised 58 patients, including 27 who were ≥ 80 years old. The patients ≥ 80 years old in the OAM group had a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate (33% vs. 10%; p = 0.027) than those < 80 years old. There were no significant differences in the 30-day mortality rate, patients' unplanned relaparotomy rate, or ICU LOS between the patients ≥ 80 years old and those < 80 in the OAM group. CONCLUSIONS Older adults who underwent OAM had a significantly higher mortality rate than younger patients. However, the OAM strategy for older nontrauma patients may still be useful and reasonable considering the severe condition of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Okishio
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan.
| | - Kentaro Ueda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan
| | - Toru Nasu
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan
| | - Shuji Kawashima
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan
| | - Kosei Kunitatsu
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan
| | - Seiya Kato
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Faes S, Hübner M, Demartines N, Hahnloser D. Cytokine clearance in serum and peritoneal fluid of patients undergoing damage control surgery with abdominal negative pressure therapy for abdominal sepsis. Pleura Peritoneum 2020. [PMCID: PMC7790174 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2020-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Open abdomen technique with negative pressure therapy (NPT) is widely used in patients with severe abdominal sepsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate cytokine clearance in serum and peritoneal fluid during NPT. Methods This prospective pilot study included six patients with severe abdominal sepsis requiring discontinuity resection and NPT for 48 h followed by planned reoperation. Cytokines (IL6, IL8, IL10, TNFalpha, and IL1beta) were measured in the serum and peritoneal fluid during index operation, on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. Results Concentrations of cytokines in peritoneal fluid were higher than in serum. IL10 showed a clearance both in serum (to 16.6%, p=0.019) and peritoneal fluid (to 40.9%, p=0.014). IL6 cleared only in serum (to 24.7%, p=0.001) with persistently high levels in peritoneal fluid. IL8 remained high in both serum and peritoneal fluid. TNFalpha and IL1beta were both low in serum with wide range of high peritoneal concentrations. Only TNFalpha in peritoneal fluid showed significant differences between patients with ischemia vs. perforation (p=0.006). Conclusions The present pilot study suggests that cytokines display distinct patterns of clearance or persistence in the peritoneal fluid and serum over the first 48 h of treatment in severe abdominal sepsis with NPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seraina Faes
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Dieter Hahnloser
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Okada I, Hifumi T, Kiriu N, Yoneyama H, Inoue K, Seki S, Hasegawa E, Kato H, Masuno T, Yokobori S. Preoperative physical functional status affects the long-term outcomes of elderly patients with open abdomen. Acute Med Surg 2020; 7:e602. [PMID: 33282315 PMCID: PMC7700104 DOI: 10.1002/ams2.602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The mortality rates among elderly patients with open abdomen (OA) are high, and pre-existing comorbidities could affect the outcomes. However, long-term prognosis remains uncertain. We examined long-term outcomes in elderly patients with OA, focusing on physical functional status. Methods We undertook a retrospective cohort study between 2007 and 2017 at a single institution. Patients with OA who were aged ≥65 years were categorized into two groups: "good preoperative functional status" group (GFG) and "poor preoperative functional status" group (PFG). The GFG was defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization performance status (PS) 0-1, whereas PFG was defined as PS 2-4. The primary outcomes were survival and PS 2 years following the initial surgery. Results Of the 53 participants, 38 and 15 were assigned to the GFG and PFG, respectively. The PFG (median age, 81 years) was older than the GFG (median age, 75.5 years; P = 0.040). The 2-year survival rate was 39.5% in GFG and 6.7% in PFG, and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant difference (P = 0.022). Among all patients, the PS at 2 years was worse than that at discharge (P = 0.007). Preoperative PS was correlated with 2-year survival (P = 0.003), whereas age and pre-existing comorbidities were not. Conclusion The long-term outcomes of elderly patients with OA are affected by the preoperative physical functional status. Functional status deteriorates in a time-dependent manner. Therefore, surgery requiring OA must be carefully considered for elderly patients with PS 2 or higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Okada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center Tokyo Japan
| | - Toru Hifumi
- Department of Emergency Medicine St. Luke's International Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Nobuaki Kiriu
- Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine National Defense Medical College Tokorozawa Japan
| | - Hisashi Yoneyama
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center Tokyo Japan
| | - Kazushige Inoue
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center Tokyo Japan
| | - Satoshi Seki
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center Tokyo Japan
| | - Eiju Hasegawa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center Tokyo Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kato
- Department of Emergency Medicine Minamitama Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Tomohiko Masuno
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Nippon Medical School Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Shoji Yokobori
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Nippon Medical School Hospital Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Petersen S, Deder A, Prause A, Pohland C, Richter D, Mansfeld T, Puhl G. Transverse vs. median laparotomy in peritonitis and staged lavage: a single center case series. GERMAN MEDICAL SCIENCE : GMS E-JOURNAL 2020; 18:Doc07. [PMID: 32973421 PMCID: PMC7492753 DOI: 10.3205/000283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background: Staged lavage was first introduced in the 1970s and now serves as a therapeutic option for septic patients with peritonitis. A central aspect of this treatment concept is leaving the abdomen open after a wide incision. To evaluate the influence of transverse vs. median access to the abdomen in staged lavage, data from the authors’ patients were analyzed. Methods: To evaluate patients with peritonitis, prospective intensive care data were examined together with data on the surgical details. The main aspects covered here were the surgical details of the lavage (namely, transverse vs. median laparotomy), number of lavages, fascia closure, wound-healing disorders, and observed lethality, in combination with the preoperatively evaluated SAPS-II score, expected hospital lethality, patient age, and the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Results: Between January 2008 and December 2018, 522 patients were treated with open abdomen and staged lavage. The mean age of the patients was 66.0 years (standard deviation (SD) 15.9 years). A median incision was used in 140 cases, and transverse laparotomy was performed in 382. The mean SAPS-II score was 46.5 (SD 15.7), expected lethality was 39.6% (SD 26.3%), and observed lethality was 19.9%. On average, two lavages were performed after the index operation. Transverse incision was significantly less likely to cause wound-healing disorder (p=0.03), and fascial dehiscence was observed less frequently in the transverse laparotomies group than in median incisions in the statistical trend (p=0.06). Conclusion: In summary, staged lavage reduced expected lethality in patients with peritonitis. Transverse incision caused wound-healing disorders and fascial dehiscence less often. Therefore, the indication for transverse laparotomy should be generous, as this form of treatment is advantageous in case of peritonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Petersen
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alice Deder
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Prause
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care & Emergency, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christopher Pohland
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Richter
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Mansfeld
- Department of Surgery, Westklinikum Hamburg Rissen, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gero Puhl
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schietroma M, Romano L, Pessia B, Mattei A, Fiasca F, Carlei F, Giuliani A. TNM: a simple classification system for complicated intra-abdominal sepsis after acute appendicitis. MINERVA CHIR 2020; 75:442-448. [PMID: 32773736 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.20.08274-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed diagnosis in case of acute appendicitis (AA) could lead to complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS). Grading systems are not commonly employed in the clinical practice, because they are too complicated or too specific. Therefore, we suggest grading the severity of complicated IAS after AA with a simple system: TNM, an acronym borrowed by cancer staging where T indicates temperature, N neutrophils, and M multiple organ failure (MOF). This prospective observational study evaluates the predictive value of the TNM score on mortality of patients with complicated IAS after AA. METHODS Sixty-eight patients with complicated IAS after AA were treated. Three classes of attributes were chosen: temperature (T), neutrophils count (N), and MOF (M). After defining the categories T (T0-T4), N (N0-N3) and M (M0-M2), these were grouped in stages (0-IV). Variables analyzed for their possible relation to death were age, sex, temperature, neutrophils count, preoperative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stage (0-IV). Odds ratios were calculated in a univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS TNM staging was: one patient stage 0; 16 patients at stage I; 26 patients at stage II; 16 patients at stage III; nine patients at stage IV. Death occurred in 15 patients (22%). Neutrophil count, preoperative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stages III-IV were potential predictors of postoperative death in univariate analysis; only stage IV was significant independent predictor of postoperative mortality in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS TNM classification is very easy to use; it helps to define the mortality risk and is useful to objectively compare patients with sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Schietroma
- Department of Surgery, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lucia Romano
- Department of Surgery, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy -
| | - Beatrice Pessia
- Department of Surgery, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonella Mattei
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Fabiana Fiasca
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Carlei
- Department of Surgery, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Surgery, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Swallow AY, Akoko LO, Lema LE. Patient's characteristics, management practices and outcome of re-laparotomies in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. Heliyon 2020; 6:e04295. [PMID: 32671249 PMCID: PMC7339055 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relaparotomy is an important indicator of the safety and quality of laparotomy in any surgical setting. Despite this, its measure in many low- and middle-income countries is scarce, Tanzania included. Understanding its existence will help curb it and mitigate its adverse outcomes by systematic improvement strategies. This study, therefore, aimed to examine characteristics of patients undergoing on-demand relaparotomy and their management outcomes at a tertiary level hospital in Tanzania. METHODS A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in the department of surgery of Muhimbili National Hospital for one year in 2017-2018. All patients (of all ages and sex) who required an on-demand relaparotomy within 60 days of their index laparotomy were identified for inclusion into the study. Data were collected regarding patient's demography, clinical characteristics, index surgical procedure, indication for relaparotomy, number of re-laparotomies, complications during re-laparotomy, ICU admission, and mortality. Data were entered into SPSS version 23 for analysis where continuous variables were summarized as means with standard deviations and categorical variables summarized as the frequency with proportions. Ethical approval for the audit was obtained from the Muhimbili University of Health IRB. RESULTS A total of 101 patients had undergone relaparotomy, with a relaparotomy rate among those primarily operated at our hospital of 7.6%. Their mean age was 37 years with equal sex distribution. The leading primary procedure had involved bowel resection and anastomosis (47.5%) with anastomotic leak being the leading reason for relaparotomy (37.6%) followed by intra-abdominal collection (29.7%), bowel fistula (19.8%) and wound dehiscence (18.8%). Electrolyte imbalance was the leading complication among the patients (22.9%) followed by anemia (21.5%), wound infection (18.9%) and Septicemia (11%). The overall mortality of rate was 39.6%. CONCLUSION On-demand relaparotomy carries a high mortality and morbidity at Muhimbili National Hospital in Tanzania. Addressing predictors and improving post-operative services are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Larry O. Akoko
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Leonard E. Lema
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after emergent laparotomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2020; 86:670-678. [PMID: 30562327 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To standardize care and promote early fascial closure among patients undergoing emergent laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure (TAC), we developed a protocol addressing patient selection, operative technique, resuscitation strategies, and critical care provisions. We hypothesized that primary fascial closure rates would increase following protocol implementation with no difference in complication rates. STUDY DESIGN We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 138 adult trauma and emergency general surgery patients who underwent emergent laparotomy and TAC, comparing protocol patients (n = 60) to recent historic controls (n = 78) who would have met protocol inclusion criteria. The protocol includes low-volume 3% hypertonic saline resuscitation, judicious wound vacuum fluid replacement, and early relaparotomy with sequential fascial closure. Demographics, baseline characteristics, illness severity, resuscitation course, operative management, and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was fascial closure. RESULTS Baseline characteristics, including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and postoperative lactate levels, were similar between groups. Within 48 hours of initial laparotomy and TAC, protocol patients received significantly lower total intravenous fluid resuscitation volumes (9.7 vs. 11.4 L, p = 0.044) and exhibited higher serum osmolarity (303 vs. 293 mOsm/kg, p = 0.001). The interval between abdominal operations was significantly shorter following protocol implementation (28.2 vs. 32.2 hours, p = 0.027). The incidence of primary fascial closure was significantly higher in the protocol group (93% vs. 81%, p = 0.045, number needed to treat = 8.3). Complication rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Protocol implementation was associated with lower crystalloid resuscitation volumes, a transient hyperosmolar state, shorter intervals between operations, and higher fascial closure rates with no difference in complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.
Collapse
|
31
|
Li X, Wei J, Zhang Y, Wang W, Wu G, Zhao Q, Li X. Open abdomen treatment for complicated intra-abdominal infection patients with gastrointestinal fistula can reduce the mortality. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19692. [PMID: 32311946 PMCID: PMC7220662 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of the open abdomen (OA) and closed abdomen (CA) approaches for treating intestinal fistula with complicated intra-abdominal infection (IFWCIAI), and analyze the risk factors in OA treatment.IFWCIAI is associated with high mortality rates and healthcare costs, as well as longer postoperative hospital stay. However, OA treatment has also been linked with increased mortality and development of secondary intestinal fistula.A total of 195 IFWCIAI patients who were operated over a period of 7 years at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into the OA group (n = 112) and CA group (n = 83) accordingly, and the mortality rates, hospital costs, and hospital stay duration of both groups were compared. In addition, the risk factors in OA treatment were also analyzed.OA resulted in significantly lower mortality rates (9.8% vs 30.1%, P < .001) and hospital costs ($11721.40 ± $9368.86 vs $20365.36 ± $21789.06, P < .001) compared with the CA group. No incidences of secondary intestinal fistula was recorded and the duration of hospital stay was similar for both groups (P = .151). Delayed OA was an independent risk factor of death following OA treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.316; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.068-1.623, P = .010), whereas early enteral nutrition (EN) exceeding 666.67 mL was a protective factor (HR = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.993-0.999, P = .018). In addition, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans were the main pathogens responsible for the death of patients after OA treatment.OA decreased mortality rates and hospital costs of IFWCIAI patients, and did not lead to any secondary fistulas. Early OA and EN also reduced mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuzhao Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
- Department of General surgery, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750002, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China
| | - Jiangpeng Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi
| | - Weizhong Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
| | - Guosheng Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
| | - Qingchuan Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
| | - Xiaohua Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tau N, Cohen I, Barash Y, Klang E. Free abdominal gas on computed tomography in the emergency department: aetiologies and association between amount of free gas and mortality. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102:581-589. [PMID: 32233866 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Free abdominal gas is an important finding with major clinical implications. However, data on the aetiologies and prognosis of patients with free gas are scarce. Our primary aim was to describe the sources of free abdominal gas on emergency department (ED) computed tomography (CT). The secondary aim was to evaluate the association between the amount of free gas and all-cause mortality. METHODS All patients who underwent CT in the ED between February 2012 and February 2019 with free abdominal gas were included in the study. A scoring system was used to assess the amount of free gas: small - gas bubbles; medium - any gas pocket ≤2cm in diameter; large - any gas pocket >2cm. Data were collected from laboratory and clinical assessment regarding the source of free gas and all-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 372 patients had free abdominal gas. Colonic diverticulitis was the most common aetiology among those with a small or medium amount of free gas (81/250 [32.4%] and 12/71 [16.9%] respectively). For patients with a large amount of gas, peptic disease was the most common aetiology (11/51 [21.6%]). Three-quarters of the patients (280/372, 75.2%) had the source of free gas identified during ED admission. Ninety-day mortality rates were 7.2%, 9.9% and 21.6% for patients with small, medium and large amounts of gas respectively (p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS Colonic diverticulitis was the most common source of free abdominal gas and peptic disease was the most common cause of a large amount of free gas. Mortality rates correlated with the amount of gas and were significantly higher in patients with a large amount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Tau
- Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, , Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - I Cohen
- Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, , Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Y Barash
- Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, , Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - E Klang
- Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, , Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Eckmann C, Isenmann R, Kujath P, Pross A, Rodloff AC, Schmitz FJ. Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Intra-abdominal infections. GMS INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2020; 8:Doc13. [PMID: 32373438 PMCID: PMC7186812 DOI: 10.3205/id000057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
This is the seventh chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. The chapter deals with the empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy of complicated intra-abdominal infections. It includes recommendations for antibacterial and antifungal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Eckmann
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Hannoversch-Münden, Germany
| | - Rainer Isenmann
- Allgemein- und Visceralchirurgie, St. Anna-Virngrund-Klinik Ellwangen, Germany
| | - Peter Kujath
- Chirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Universität Lübeck, Germany
| | - Annette Pross
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Germany
| | - Arne C. Rodloff
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Infektionsepidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Germany
| | - Franz-Josef Schmitz
- Institut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Mikrobiologie, Hygiene, Umweltmedizin und Transfusionsmedizin Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Staged Peritoneal Lavage for Secondary Peritonitis. World J Surg 2020; 44:2185-2190. [PMID: 32144471 PMCID: PMC7266858 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05455-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Secondary peritonitis is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Data on the effect of staged re-laparotomy or re-laparoscopy as a surgical option in the management of abdominal sepsis due to secondary peritonitis are limited and conflicting. Herein, we report the outcomes of patients undergoing staged peritoneal lavage (SPL) for secondary peritonitis in our department. Methods This is a single-center retrospective analysis of the data of patients undergoing SPL for secondary peritonitis. SPL was performed via either re-laparotomy or re-laparoscopy. The simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) was calculated at the time of the initial operation and for each SPL. The end points of interest included: the evolution of sepsis characterized by the SAPS II score, the mortality rate and the rate of definitive abdominal wall closure. Results The data of 74 patients with a median age of 73 years requiring at least one SPL between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed. The median number of SPL performed was three (range 1–12). A sequential drop of SAPS II score from 41 at the initial procedure to 32 at the third SPL was documented. The overall mortality rate was 16.2%, definitive abdominal closure was achieved in all surviving patients and the median length of stay was 17.5d Conclusion Staged re-laparotomy or re-laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage may reduce the severity of peritonitis and reduce the risk of mortality in patients with abdominal sepsis. Maintaining the abdominal wall under constant retraction using a rigid mesh while creating an open abdomen is a crucial step in achieving definite abdominal wall closure. Thus, staged peritoneal lavage may be a good surgical option for selected patients with peritonitis.
Collapse
|
35
|
de Vries FEE, Claessen JJM, Atema JJ, van Ruler O, Boermeester MA. Immediate Closure of Abdominal Cavity with Biologic Mesh versus Temporary Abdominal Closure of Open Abdomen in Non-Trauma Emergency Patients (CLOSE-UP Study). Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2020; 21:694-703. [PMID: 32097095 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2019.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In more than 10% of emergency laparotomies in non-trauma patients, primary fascial closure is not achievable because of excessive visceral edema, which leaves the patient with an open abdomen (OA). An OA harbors an inherent high risk of serious complications, and temporary closure devices are used to achieve delayed fascial closure. A potential new strategy in preventing OA is immediate closure during the emergency procedure with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh. Methods: This is a prospective comparative cohort feasibility study in 13 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Non-trauma patients who underwent emergency laparotomy in which regular sutured primary fascial closure was not achievable because of excessive intra-abdominal edema were eligible. In one cohort, Biomesh (n = 20), the abdominal cavity was immediately closed at the emergency laparotomy with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh. In a parallel cohort, Control (n = 20), the resulting OA was managed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC; inlay polyglactin [Vicryl™] mesh [n = 7]) or commercial (ABTheraTM) abdominal negative pressure therapy device (n = 13)). The primary end point was the proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days. Results: At 90 days, 65% (13/20) of the abdominal cavities were closed in the Biomesh cohort versus 45% (9/20) in Controls (p = 0.204). In the Biomesh cohort, seven of 20 (35%) patients had at least one major complication versus 15 of 20 (75%) patients in the Control cohort (p = 0.011). Both the median number of intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation days were significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort; one versus 10 (p = 0.002) and 0 versus four (p = 0.003) days, respectively. The number of abdominal reoperations was significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort (median 0 vs. two, p < 0.001; total number five vs. 44). Conclusions: If primary fascial closure cannot be achieved at the emergency laparotomy in non-trauma patients, immediate abdominal closure by use of a non-crosslinked biologic mesh prevents OA management. This results in a non-significant higher proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days compared with OA management with TAC techniques, and in a significant reduction of major complications and reoperations, and a shorter ICU stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur E E de Vries
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M Claessen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper J Atema
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oddeke van Ruler
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ng-Kamstra JS, Rennert-May E, McKee J, Lundgren S, Manns B, Kirkpatrick AW. Protocol for a parallel economic evaluation of a trial comparing two surgical strategies in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis: the COOL-cost study. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:15. [PMID: 32085778 PMCID: PMC7035651 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00294-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of death in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) remains high despite decades of surgical and antimicrobial research. New management strategies are required to improve outcomes. The Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL) trial investigates an open-abdomen (OA) approach with active negative pressure peritoneal therapy. This therapy is hypothesized to better manage peritoneal bacterial contamination, drain inflammatory ascites, and reduce the risk of intra-abdominal hypertension leading to improved survival and decreased complications. The total costs and cost-effectiveness of this therapy (as compared with standard fascial closure) are unknown. METHODS We propose a parallel cost-utility analysis of this intervention to be conducted alongside the 1-year trial, extrapolating beyond that using decision analysis. Using resource use metrics (e.g., length of stay, re-admissions) from patients at all study sites and microcosting data from patients enrolled in Calgary, Alberta, the mean cost difference between treatment arms will be established from a publicly-funded health care payer perspective. Quality of life will be measured at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively with the Euroqol EQ-5D-5 L and SF-36 surveys. A within-trial analysis will establish cost and utility at 1 year, using a bootstrapping approach to provide confidence intervals around an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. If neither operative strategy is economically dominant, Markov modeling will be used to extrapolate the cost per quality-adjusted life years gained to 2-, 5-, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. Future costs and benefits will be discounted at 1.5% per annum. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve will be generated using Monte Carlo simulation. If all trial outcomes are similar, the primary analysis will default to a cost-minimization approach. Subgroup analysis will be carried out for patients with and without septic shock at presentation, and for patients whose initial APACHE II scores are > 20 versus ≤ 20. DISCUSSION In addition to an estimate of the clinical effectiveness of an OA approach for SCIAS, an understanding of its cost effectiveness will be required prior to its adoption in any resource-constrained environment. We will estimate this key parameter for use by clinicians and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03163095, registered May 22, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Ng-Kamstra
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1 N4, Canada.
| | - Elissa Rennert-May
- Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jessica McKee
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Skyla Lundgren
- Surgical Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Braden Manns
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1 N4, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.,The Trauma Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sartelli M, Pagani L, Iannazzo S, Moro ML, Viale P, Pan A, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, D'Errico MM, Agreiter I, Amadio Nespola G, Barchiesi F, Benigni V, Binazzi R, Cappanera S, Chiodera A, Cola V, Corsi D, Cortese F, Crapis M, Cristini F, D'Arpino A, De Simone B, Di Bella S, Di Marzo F, Donati A, Elisei D, Fantoni M, Ferrari A, Foghetti D, Francisci D, Gattuso G, Giacometti A, Gesuelli GC, Marmorale C, Martini E, Meledandri M, Murri R, Padrini D, Palmieri D, Pauri P, Rebagliati C, Ricchizzi E, Sambri V, Schimizzi AM, Siquini W, Scoccia L, Scoppettuolo G, Sganga G, Storti N, Tavio M, Toccafondi G, Tumietto F, Viaggi B, Vivarelli M, Tranà C, Raso M, Labricciosa FM, Dhingra S, Catena F. A proposal for a comprehensive approach to infections across the surgical pathway. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:13. [PMID: 32070390 PMCID: PMC7029591 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00295-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of best practices in infection prevention and management, many healthcare workers fail to implement them and evidence-based practices tend to be underused in routine practice. Prevention and management of infections across the surgical pathway should always focus on collaboration among all healthcare workers sharing knowledge of best practices. To clarify key issues in the prevention and management of infections across the surgical pathway, a multidisciplinary task force of experts convened in Ancona, Italy, on May 31, 2019, for a national meeting. This document represents the executive summary of the final statements approved by the expert panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Sartelli
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, ASUR Marche, Macerata, Italy.
| | - Leonardo Pagani
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | | | - Maria Luisa Moro
- Regional Agency for Health and Social Care, Emilia-Romagna Region-ASSR, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Clinics of Infectious Diseases, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, "Alma Mater Studiorum"-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Pan
- Infectious Diseases, ASST di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Emergency Surgery Unit, New Santa Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marcello Mario D'Errico
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Iris Agreiter
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Denis Burkitt, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Francesco Barchiesi
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Valeria Benigni
- Clinical Administration, Senigallia Hospital, ASUR Marche, Senigallia, AN, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Cappanera
- Infectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine, "S. Maria" Hospital, Terni, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Cola
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniela Corsi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Civitanova Marche Hospital, ASUR Marche, Civitanova Marche, MC, Italy
| | - Francesco Cortese
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Care Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Crapis
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Pordenone Hospital, Pordenone, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro D'Arpino
- Hospital Pharmacy Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Operative Unit of General Surgery, Azienda USL IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Bella
- Infectious Diseases Department, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Abele Donati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Daniele Elisei
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Macerata Hospital, ASUR Marche, Macerata, Italy
| | - Massimo Fantoni
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Istituto di Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Ferrari
- Department of Critical Care Medicine Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Domitilla Foghetti
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Gianni Gattuso
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy
| | - Andrea Giacometti
- Infectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Biological Sciences and Public Health, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Marmorale
- Department of Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University of Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Enrica Martini
- Hospital Hygiene Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Rita Murri
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Istituto di Clinica delle Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Padrini
- Clinical Administration Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Paola Pauri
- Unit of Microbiology and Virology, Senigallia Hospital, Senigallia, AN, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Ricchizzi
- Regional Agency for Health and Social Care, Emilia-Romagna Region-ASSR, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vittorio Sambri
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Unit of Microbiology, The Great Romagna Area Hub Laboratory, Pievesestina, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Walter Siquini
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, ASUR Marche, Macerata, Italy
| | - Loredana Scoccia
- Unit of Hospital Pharmacy, Macerata Hospital, ASUR Marche, Macerata, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Scoppettuolo
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Division of Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Tavio
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giulio Toccafondi
- Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety Center, Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabio Tumietto
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Clinics of Infectious Diseases, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, "Alma Mater Studiorum"-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruno Viaggi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Florence Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cristian Tranà
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, ASUR Marche, Macerata, Italy
| | | | | | - Sameer Dhingra
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Fausto Catena
- Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Which Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine Have Shown Reduced Mortality? A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:1680-1691. [DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
39
|
Tsai YY, Chen WTL. Management of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery: a review article. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 10:1229-1237. [PMID: 31949944 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.07.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality, prolonged length of stay, higher readmission rates, the potential need for further operative interventions, and unintended permanent stomas; resulting in increased hospital costs and resource use, and decreased quality of life. This review article is to present definition, diagnosis and management strategies for AL after rectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yao Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| | - William Tzu-Liang Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schietroma M, Pessia B, Mattei A, Romano L, Giuliani A, Carlei F. Temperature-Neutrophils-Multiple Organ Failure Grading for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2019; 21:69-74. [PMID: 31460841 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2019.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The grading systems for intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) are not employed commonly in clinical practice because they are too complicated or too specific. We propose to grade IAS with a simple grading system: the TNM system, which is an acronym borrowed from cancer staging, where T indicates Temperature, N indicates Neutrophils, and M indicates Multiple organ failure (MOF). The aim of this prospective observational study is to assess the predictive value of the TNM score on deaths of patients with complicated IAS. Patients and Methods: We considered 147 patients with complicated IAS. Three classes of attribute were chosen: Temperature (T), Neutrophil count (N), and MOF (M). After defining the categories T (T0-T4), N (N0-N3), and M (M0-M2), they were grouped in stages (0-IV). We analyzed specific variables for their possible relation to death: Age, gender, blood transfusion, causes of IAS, T, N, pre-operative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stage 0, I, II, III, and IV. Odds ratios were calculated in a uni-variable and multi-variable analysis. Results: This was the distribution in classes, based on TNM stages: One patient was in stage 0; 15 patients in stage I; 47 patients in stage II; 56 patients in stage III; 28 patients in stage IV. Death occurred in 45 (30.6%) patients. The N, pre-operative organ failure, immunocompromised status, stage III-IV were potential predictors of post-operative death in uni-variable analysis. Only pre-operative organ failure and stage IV were significant independent predictors of post-operative death in multi-variable analysis. Conclusions: The TNM classification is an easy system that could be considered to define the death risk of patients with IAS and to compare patients with sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Schietroma
- Department of Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Beatrice Pessia
- Department of Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonella Mattei
- Department of Life, Health &Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lucia Romano
- Department of Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Carlei
- Department of Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Karhof S, Haverkort M, Simmermacher R, Hietbrink F, Leenen L, van Wessem K. Underlying disease determines the risk of an open abdomen treatment, final closure, however, is determined by the surgical abdominal history. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 47:113-120. [PMID: 31451863 PMCID: PMC7851030 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01205-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Temporary abdominal closure is frequently used in several situations such as abbreviated surgery in damage control situations or when closing is impossible due to organ distention or increased abdominal pressure. The ultimate goal is to eventually close the fascia; however, little is known about factors predicting abdominal closure. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with the need for open abdomen as well as indicating the possibility of delayed fascial closure after a period of open abdominal treatment. METHODS A retrospective review of all patients that underwent midline laparotomy between January 2008 and December 2012 was performed. Both factors predicting open abdominal treatment and possibility to close the fascia afterwards were identified and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS 775 laparotomies in 525 patients (60% male) were included. 109 patients (21%) had an open abdomen with a mortality rate of 27%. Male gender and acidosis were associated with open abdominal treatment. In 54%, the open abdomen could be closed by delayed fascial closure. The number of laparotomies both before and during temporary abdominal treatment was associated with failure of closure. CONCLUSION In this study, male sex and physiological derangement, reflected by acidosis, were independent predictors of open abdominal treatment. Furthermore, the success of delayed fascial closure depends on number of abdominal surgical procedures. Moreover, based on our experiences, we suggest to change modalities early on, to prevent multiple fruitless attempts to close the abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi Karhof
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark Haverkort
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Simmermacher
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn van Wessem
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Allaway MGR, Clement K, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Early Laparoscopic Washout may Resolve Persistent Intra-abdominal Infection Post-appendicectomy. World J Surg 2019; 43:998-1006. [PMID: 30478686 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4871-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) complicates 2-3% of patients having an appendicectomy. The usual management is prolonged antibiotics and drainage of the IAA. From 2006, our unit chose to use early re-laparoscopy and washout in patients with persistent sepsis following appendicectomy. The aims of this study were to assess the outcomes of early laparoscopic washout in patients with features of persistent intra-abdominal sepsis and compare those with percutaneous drainage and open drainage of post-appendicectomy IAA. METHODS A retrospective case note review was performed for all patients having a laparoscopic washout, percutaneous drainage or open drainage following appendicectomy between January 2006 and December 2017. RESULTS During the period, 4901 appendicectomies occurred. Forty-one (0.8%) patients had a laparoscopic washout, 16 (0.3%) had percutaneous drainage, and 6 (0.1%) had an open drainage. The demographics, ASA grade and pathology at initial appendicectomy were similar. The mean time after appendicectomy was significantly shorter for laparoscopic washout (4.1 days vs. 10.1 and 9.0 days, p = <0.003). The mean time for resolution of SIRS was significantly shorter (2.0 days vs. 3.3 and 5.2 days, p <0.02). The morbidity and length of stay were similar. CONCLUSION Early laparoscopic washout for persistent intra-abdominal sepsis may be an alternative to non-operative management and delayed intervention for IAA and may have better outcomes than either percutaneous drainage or open drainage. A prospective randomised comparison is required to further evaluate the indications and role of early laparoscopic washout post-appendicectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G R Allaway
- Department of Surgery, Nepean Hosptial, P. O. Box 67, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Kristenne Clement
- Department of Surgery, Nepean Hosptial, P. O. Box 67, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Guy D Eslick
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Clinical Sciences Building, Nepean Hospital, P. O. Box 67, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Michael R Cox
- Department of Surgery, Nepean Hosptial, P. O. Box 67, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. .,The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Clinical Sciences Building, Nepean Hospital, P. O. Box 67, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schmoch T, Al-Saeedi M, Hecker A, Richter DC, Brenner T, Hackert T, Weigand MA. Evidenzbasierte, interdisziplinäre Behandlung der abdominellen Sepsis. Chirurg 2019; 90:363-378. [DOI: 10.1007/s00104-019-0795-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
44
|
van de Groep K, Verhoeff TL, Verboom DM, Bos LD, Schultz MJ, Bonten MJM, Cremer OL. Epidemiology and outcomes of source control procedures in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection. J Crit Care 2019; 52:258-264. [PMID: 31054787 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the characteristics and procedural outcomes of source control interventions among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with severe intra-abdominal-infection (IAI). MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified consecutive patients with suspected IAI in whom a source control intervention had been performed in two tertiary ICUs in the Netherlands, and performed retrospective in-depth case reviews to evaluate procedure type, diagnostic yield, and adequacy of source control after 14 days. RESULTS A total of 785 procedures were observed among 353 patients, with initial interventions involving 266 (75%) surgical versus 87 (25%) percutaneous approaches. Surgical index procedures typically involved IAI of (presumed) gastrointestinal origin (72%), whereas percutaneous index procedures were mostly performed for infections of the biliary tract/pancreas (50%) or peritoneal cavity (33%). Overall, 178 (50%) patients required multiple interventions (median 3 (IQR 2-4)). In a subgroup of 236 patients having their first procedure upon ICU admission, effective source control was ultimately achieved for 159 (67%) subjects. Persistence of organ failure was associated with inadequacy of source control at day 14, whereas trends in inflammatory markers were non-predictive. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of ICU patients with IAI require more than one intervention, yet successful source control is eventually achieved in a majority of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten van de Groep
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Tessa L Verhoeff
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Diana M Verboom
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Lieuwe D Bos
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcus J Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc J M Bonten
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Olaf L Cremer
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Outcomes of open abdomen versus primary closure following emergent laparotomy for suspected secondary peritonitis: A propensity-matched analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019; 87:623-629. [DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
46
|
Inukai K, Usui A, Yamada M, Amano K, Mukai N, Tsunetoshi Y, Nakata Y, Yokota J. Open abdominal management for perforative peritonitis with septic shock: a retrospective analysis on usefulness of a standardized treatment protocol. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 47:93-98. [PMID: 30949740 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01132-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Damage control surgery (DCS) with open abdominal management (OAM) has been increasingly expanded to include critically ill non-trauma patients. However, there is limited data regarding the usefulness of this protocol for the treatment of severe perforative peritonitis (PP), especially with septic shock (SS). Here, we retrospectively evaluated the usefulness of our OAM protocol for PP with SS. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with from June 2015 to September 2018. The proposed protocol was composed of the following steps: (1) rapid control of contamination; (2) temporary abdominal closure; (3) repeated washout of the abdominal cavity; and (4) delayed definitive surgery. For temporary abdominal closure, a negative pressure wound therapy device was used. The end points were the morbidity and 30-day mortality rates. Logistic backward regression was performed to identify factors associated with complications. RESULTS The mortality rate was 4% (1/25) and the overall morbidity rate of surviving patients was 58.3% (14/24). The mean duration of the first DCS was 67.36 ± 22.83 min. The median durations of ventilation and intensive care unit stay were 5 and 7 days, respectively. Although not significant, morbidity might be associated with age, diabetes mellitus, initial operative time, and OAM duration. CONCLUSIONS A standardized protocol for OAM may improve the outcomes of patients with SS due to PP. This damage control approach can be applied for the treatment of severe abdominal sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Inukai
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan.
| | - Akihiro Usui
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Motohiko Yamada
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Koji Amano
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mukai
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsunetoshi
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Yasuki Nakata
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Junichiro Yokota
- Department of Acute Care Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-cho, Nishi-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Käser SA, Brosi P, Clavien PA, Vonlanthen R. Blurring the boundary between open abdomen treatment and ventral hernia repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:489-494. [PMID: 30729317 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01757-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Therapeutic approaches for septic open abdomen treatment remain a major challenge with many uncertainties. The most convincing method is vacuum-assisted wound closure with mesh-mediated fascia traction with a protective plastic sheet placed on the viscera. As this plastic sheet and the mesh must be removed before final fascial closure, such a technique only allows temporary abdominal closure. This retrospective study analyzes the results of a modification of this technique allowing final abdominal closure using an anti-adhesive permeable polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh. METHODS The outcome of all consecutive patients with septic open abdomen treatment at one academic surgical department from January 2013 to June 2015 was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Retrospectively, 57 severely ill consecutive patients with septic open abdomen treatment with a 30-day mortality of 26% and a 2-year mortality of 51% were included in the study. In 26 patients, no mesh was implanted; in 31 patients, mesh implantation was done at median third-look laparotomy, median 5 days postoperative. Re-laparotomies after mesh implantation (median n = 2) revealed anastomotic leakage in 16% but no new bowel fistula. In 40% of those patients who had mesh implantation, fascia closure was not achieved and the mesh was left in place in a bridging position avoiding planned ventral hernia. CONCLUSION The application of an anti-adhesive PVDF mesh for fascia traction in vacuum-assisted wound closure of septic open abdomen is novel, versatile, and seems to be safe. It offers the highly relevant possibility for provisional and final abdominal closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Käser
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - P Brosi
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - P A Clavien
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - R Vonlanthen
- Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zharikov AN, Lubyansky VG, Zharikov AA. A differentiated approach to repeat small-bowel anastomoses in patients with postoperative peritonitis: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2019; 46:1055-1061. [PMID: 30719528 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01084-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative peritonitis still remains the cause of a high mortality rate in emergency abdominal surgery. Here we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different surgical strategies for small-bowel perforations that resulted in postoperative peritonitis. METHODS Surgical management results for 140 patients with postoperative peritonitis due to small-bowel perforations, necrosis and anastomotic leakage were comparatively analyzed. Using the APACHE-II and MPI scoring systems, different surgeon attitudes were examined in three patient groups (primary anastomosis, delayed anastomosis, and enterostomy). RESULTS The surgical approach in patient group I (n = 47, APACHE-II 11.7 ± 1.2, MPI 14.7 ± 1.3) involved the closure of small-bowel perforations or small-bowel resection to place primary anastomosis. The mortality rate was 17%. Patient group II (n = 48, APACHE-II 16.8 ± 0.7, MPI 19.3 ± 0.3) underwent delayed small-bowel anastomosis during planned relaparotomies. The mortality rate was 18.8%. Because patients in patient group III (n = 45, APACHE-II 22.3 ± 1.3, MPI 24.6 ± 1.2) were in very critical condition, anastomoses were not placed after bowel resection, and the surgical procedure was completed with enterostomy. The highest mortality rate of 37.8% was documented in this patient group. CONCLUSION The differentiated surgical approach undertaken herein using delayed small-bowel anastomosis in more serious patients with postoperative peritonitis was able to mitigate the risk of recurrent anastomotic leaks and was not accompanied by a considerable rise in mortality. The mortality for primary repair and delayed primary closure was basically the same (17.0% and 18.8%, p = 0.03); however, delayed anastomosis in the patients with postoperative peritonitis at higher APACHE-II and MPI scores for severity of illness showed 15.1% less complications in the form of anastomotic leaks (p = 0.04).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey N Zharikov
- Chair of Neymark Departmental Surgery and Hospital Surgery, Altai State Medical University, Prospect Lenina 40, Barnaul, Altai Krai, 656038, Russia.
| | - Vladimir G Lubyansky
- Chair of Neymark Departmental Surgery and Hospital Surgery, Altai State Medical University, Prospect Lenina 40, Barnaul, Altai Krai, 656038, Russia
| | - Andrey A Zharikov
- Chair of Neymark Departmental Surgery and Hospital Surgery, Altai State Medical University, Prospect Lenina 40, Barnaul, Altai Krai, 656038, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hijji T, AlShammari A, AlHammad A, AlKhalefah G, Hashem F, Almomen S, Aburahmah M. Incisional hernia repair with plication and utilization of Botox injections: First case report from Saudi Arabia for a 19-year-old female. Clin Case Rep 2019; 7:311-315. [PMID: 30847196 PMCID: PMC6389482 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This article reports on the use of Botox preoperatively for the treatment of a complex ventral hernia which would have typically been treated with component separation technique. The case demonstrates that using the recently developed technique can aid in performing a tension-free hernia repair with potentially lower complication and recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talal Hijji
- College of MedicineAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah AlShammari
- College of MedicineAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC)RiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Alanoud AlHammad
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC)RiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Ghadah AlKhalefah
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC)RiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Fuad Hashem
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC)RiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Salha Almomen
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC)RiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Aburahmah
- College of MedicineAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC)RiyadhSaudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Richman A, Burlew CC. Lessons from Trauma Care: Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and Damage Control Laparotomy in the Patient with Gastrointestinal Disease. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:417-424. [PMID: 30276590 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3988-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Richman
- Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock Street, MC 0206, Denver, CO, 80204, USA
| | - Clay Cothren Burlew
- Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 777 Bannock Street, MC 0206, Denver, CO, 80204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|