Cardiac Stress Test Trends Among US Patients Younger Than 65 Years, 2005-2012

Significance of Coronary Artery Calcifications and Ischemic Electrocardiographic Changes Among Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

BACKGROUND

Estimation of coronary artery calcification (CAC) can provide important prognostic information in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to investigate whether CAC evaluation offers additional insight into the association of stress electrocardiographic (ECG) changes with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

METHODS

A total of 12,265 patients (47% female, median: 64 (56-73) years, body mass index: 29 ± 7 kg/m2) who underwent exercise treadmill or regadenoson single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT) MPI during June 2016 to May 2022 at a large academic center were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 1.6 (IQR: 0.5-3.0) years, the primary outcome (3-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization, major adverse cardiac event [MACE]) occurred in 1,422 patients. Within participants with normal perfusion, MACE rate was the highest in patients with CAC with or without ischemic stress ECG (9.6% and 7%, respectively), and low event rates were observed in patients without CAC with or without ischemic stress ECG (0.5% and 1.9% respectively). In a subgroup analysis, all CAC grades (mild, moderate, severe) were independently associated with worse 3-year composite endpoint rates. In multivariable analysis, the presence of CAC was associated with MACE independent of ischemic ECG changes in both the overall cohort (P < 0.001) and when restricting the analysis to patients with normal perfusion (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with normal single-photon emission computed tomography/CT MPI, CAC is strongly associated with adverse outcomes independent of ischemic ECG changes with low event rates in patients without CAC on attenuation CT irrespective of ischemic stress ECG changes.

Clinical Care Delivery in Chest Pain Patients Without an Acute Coronary Syndrome-A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Chest pain is a prevalent and critical complaint among patients in emergency departments (EDs) across the United States. Professional societies have refined clinical guidelines to establish the most effective diagnostic pathways for identifying obstructive coronary artery disease. However, many healthcare systems do not adhere to the guideline-validated clinical pathways and instead order repeat diagnostic testing. This study evaluated the efficiency of care delivered to chest pain patients in our tertiary medical center. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to our ED with acute chest pain between November and December 2022, collecting information about chest pain, the testing received, and their outcomes. The data were then reviewed to determine clinical practice patterns. Results: We included 342 patients, with a mean age of 54 years; 54.7% of study participants were females. Patients who were eventually admitted from the ED (46.5%, n = 159) were either under observation or inpatient status. Furthermore, 16.6%, n = 57, of patients had an ischemic evaluation within the preceding year. Physicians documented a HEART score in 24.6%, n = 84 of the patients. While HEART score is a considerable factor utilized by admitting physicians to triage incoming patients, 39%, n = 62, of all admitted patients had a low HEART score (<3) and a negative ischemic evaluation within the past year. Conclusions: This single-center retrospective analysis of care delivery for non-ACS (acute coronary syndrome) chest pain patients demonstrated that the HEART score was not thoroughly documented in the study population. This resulted in an overperformance of inpatient ischemic testing, with an increased length of stay and costs for the institution and healthcare system. This study serves as a quality improvement initiative to explore similar data within their institutions and as a reminder of the importance of utilizing validated clinical pathways to streamline clinical care and reduce healthcare costs.

Acupuncture Dosage and Its Correlation with Effectiveness in Patients with Chronic Stable Angina: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of various acupuncture dosages for Chronic Stable Angina (CSA) using randomized controlled trials (RCTs), addressing the unclear relationship between dosage and effectiveness despite acupuncture's potential.

Methods

We searched eight bibliographic databases from inception to October 31, 2024, evaluating RCTs comparing acupuncture to placebo or standard care for CSA patients, focusing on angina attack frequency as the primary outcome. Studies were categorized into high (HDG), moderate (MDG), and low (LDG) dosage groups based on acupuncture characteristics: the number of acupoints, total sessions, frequency per week, and the need for "Deqi".

Results

Of the 807 citations screened, 16 studies (1240 patients) were included: 3 studies in LDG, 10 in MDG, and 3 in HDG. Acupuncture significantly reduced angina attacks compared to placebo (SMD, -0.51; 95% CI [-0.77, -0.25], P = 0.0001, I 2=62%), and standard care (SMD, -1.25, 95% CI [-1.89, -0.61], P = 0.00001, I2 =92%) without increasing adverse events. MDG showed a notable difference in reducing angina attacks (SMD, -0.60, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.29], P = 0.001, I2 =60%) while LDG and HDG did not. There is no difference in adverse events between groups. The evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate, and the results should be cautiously applied.

Conclusion

Acupuncture therapy effectively and safely alleviates CSA symptoms. Moderate dosage demonstrated the potential for better effects in reducing symptoms, suggesting optimal dosage considerations for future treatments.

Prospero Registration Number

CRD42022321547.

Role of non-invasive coronary imaging in stable angina

Chest pain represents a symptom of significant clinical concern due to the potential for lethal etiologies. Accordingly, it is critical to ascertain the presence of stable angina through various diagnostic tests to inform subsequent therapeutic strategies. Stable angina, while potentially progressing to more severe conditions if left untreated, suffers from a paucity of research regarding its management compared to other more fatal causes of chest pain. Recent advancements in radiological imaging necessitate a re-evaluation of the array and functionality of diagnostic tests, with particular emphasis on prioritizing non-invasive methods such as electrocardiography and echocardiography. This study undertakes a comprehensive review of the literature pertaining to various diagnostic tests for stable angina. We conclude that the management of a patient presenting with chest pain encompasses a continuum of care, beginning with a detailed patient history to estimate pre-test probability and culminating in computed tomography coronary angiography. This continuum is highly individualized, taking into account patient-specific variables, disease burden, and test indications. In an era of rapid research advancement, our findings delineate the optimal sequence of initial diagnostic tests, emphasizing the role of current non-invasive imaging modalities as outlined in standard clinical guidelines.

Hemodynamic response and safety of vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

INTRODUCTION

Vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a powerful diagnostic modality, but data toward its use in patients with permanent pacemakers (PPMs) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with ICDs (>1% pacing) or PPMs who underwent regadenoson single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and all patients with ICDs or PPMs who underwent stress CMR were retrospectively identified. SPECT tests were analyzed for hemodynamic responses and new pacing requirements; CMR studies were examined for safety, device characteristics and programming, hemodynamic responses, and image quality. Changes from baseline were evaluated with the Related-Samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Of 67 patients (median age 65 [IQR 58-72] years, 31 [46%] female, 31 [46%] Black), 47 underwent SPECT and 20 CMR. With regadenoson SPECT, 89% of patients experienced tachycardic responses above resting heart rates (+19 [13-32] beats per minute, p < .01). During stress CMR, 10 (50%) devices were asynchronously paced approximately 10 beats per minute above resting rates, and the remaining were temporarily deactivated. Those with asynchronous pacing had no changes in heart rates, whereas patients with deactivated devices had near uniform heart rate accelerations. Image quality was diagnostic in the majority of stress CMR sequences, with nonconditional ICDs contributing 40 of 57 (70%) of nondiagnostic segments.

CONCLUSION

This data supports the safety of vasodilator stress CMR with promising diagnostic quality images in patients with CMR conditional ICDs and PPMs. Despite a near uniform tachycardic response to regadenoson in the SPECT environment, high rates of asynchronous pacing during vasodilator stress CMR did not result in competitive pacing or adverse arrhythmic events. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and confirm the diagnostic and prognostic performance of stress CMR in these individuals.

A Reminder That Stress Echocardiography Is Useful in Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia in Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Case Series

Identification of ischemia remains critical when assessing individuals presenting with atypical symptoms or in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). Several imaging modalities are currently available to attain this diagnostic goal. Unfortunately, not all case presentations are straightforward, particularly when microvascular dysfunction (MVD) is the cause of symptoms in the absence of identifiable epicardial luminal stenosis. Specifically, in such cases, current imaging guidelines do not include stress echocardiography (SE) as a recommended tool when assessing these patients. We present three cases that highlight the utility of SE for identifying MVD and provide mechanistic explanations. We believe that SE should not be completely discarded as an inadequate testing modality; we highlight the potential utility of this imaging modality not only in diagnosing CAD and pre-surgical evaluation of patients but also in identifying patients with MVD.

Stress CMR in patients with obesity: insights from the Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States (SPINS) registry

AIMS

Non-invasive assessment and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in patients with large body habitus is challenging. We aim to examine whether body mass index (BMI) modifies the prognostic value and diagnostic utility of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in a multicentre registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The SPINS Registry enrolled consecutive intermediate-risk patients who presented with a clinical indication for stress CMR in the USA between 2008 and 2013. Baseline demographic data including BMI, CMR indices, and ratings of study quality were collected. Primary outcome was defined by a composite of cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Of the 2345 patients with available BMI included in the SPINS cohort, 1177 (50%) met criteria for obesity (BMI ≥ 30) with 531 (23%) at or above Class 2 obesity (BMI ≥ 35). In all BMI categories, >95% of studies were of diagnostic quality for cine, perfusion, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. At a median follow-up of 5.4 years, those without ischaemia and LGE experienced a low annual rate of hard events (<1%), across all BMI strata. In patients with obesity, both ischaemia [hazard ratio (HR): 2.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-3.50; P = 0.003] and LGE (HR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.83-5.22; P < 0.001) maintained strong adjusted association with the primary outcome in a multivariable Cox regression model. Downstream referral rates to coronary angiography, revascularization, and cost of care spent on ischaemia testing did not significantly differ within the BMI categories.

CONCLUSION

In this large multicentre registry, elevated BMI did not negatively impact the diagnostic quality and the effectiveness of risk stratification of patients referred for stress CMR.

Frequency and Outcomes of Preoperative Stress Testing in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty from 2004 to 2017

Importance

Cardiac stress testing is often performed prior to noncardiac surgery, although trends in use of preoperative stress testing and the effect of testing on cardiovascular outcomes are currently unknown.

Objective

To describe temporal trends and outcomes of preoperative cardiac stress testing from 2004 to 2017.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cross-sectional study of patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty from 2004 to 2017. Trend analysis was conducted using Joinpoint and generalized estimating equation regression. The study searched IBM MarketScan Research Databases inpatient and outpatient health care claims for private insurers including supplemental Medicare coverage and included patients with a claim indicating an elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2017.

Exposures

Elective total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Trend in yearly frequency of preoperative cardiac stress testing.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 801 396 elective total hip (27.9%; n = 246 168 of 801 396) and total knee (72.1%; 555 228 of 801 396) arthroplasty procedures, with a median age of 62 years (interquartile range, 57-70 years) and 58.1% women (n = 465 545 of 801 396). The overall rate of stress testing during the study period was 10.4% (n = 83 307 of 801 396). The rate of stress tests increased 0.65% (95% CI, 0.09-1.21; P = .03) annually from quarter (Q) 1 of 2004 until Q2 of 2006. A joinpoint was identified at Q3 of 2006 (95% CI, 2005 Q4 to 2007 Q4) when preoperative stress test use decreased by -0.71% (95% CI, -0.79% to 0.63%; P < .001) annually. A second joinpoint was identified at the Q4 of 2013 (95% CI, 2011 Q3 to 2015 Q3), when the decline in stress testing rates slowed to -0.40% (95% CI, -0.57% to -0.24%; P < .001) annually. The overall rate of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest was 0.24% (n = 1677 of 686 067). Rates of myocardial infraction and cardiac arrest were not different in patients with at least 1 Revised Cardiac Risk Index condition who received a preoperative stress test and those who did not (0.60%; n = 221 of 36 554 vs 0.57%; n = 694 of 122 466; P = .51).

Conclusions and Relevance

The frequency of preoperative stress testing declined annually from 2006 through 2017. Among patients with at least 1 Revised Cardiac Risk Index condition, no difference was observed in cardiovascular outcomes between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative testing.

Stress cardiac MRI in stable coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Non-invasive testing is often the first step in the evaluation of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is an established modality with high diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value. This review will focus on the recent advances in understanding how stress CMR can help guide patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnostic accuracy of stress CMR has been validated against coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with stable CAD. Large registry data have shown stress CMR to have important prognostic importance and that its cost-effectiveness compares favorably to alternatives. In patients with stable CAD, guidance using a CMR based strategy led to equivalent outcomes when compared to coronary angiography with FFR.

SUMMARY

In persons with stable CAD, Stress CMR is an accurate and cost-effective imaging modality that should be considered in patients at intermediate pre-test probability of CAD. Prognostic studies have shown it to have excellent negative predictive value and that it can safely serve as a "gatekeeper" for invasive angiography.

Limited Use of Outpatient Stress Testing in Young Patients With Atypical Chest Pain

Low prevalence of coronary artery disease within this population suggests that younger patients may not require stress testing for chest pain evaluations as long as pretest likelihood is low.

The new clinical standard of integrated quadruple stress echocardiography with ABCD protocol

BACKGROUND

The detection of regional wall motion abnormalities is the cornerstone of stress echocardiography. Today, stress echo shows increasing trends of utilization due to growing concerns for radiation risk, higher cost and stronger environmental impact of competing techniques. However, it has also limitations: underused ability to identify factors of clinical vulnerability outside coronary artery stenosis; operator-dependence; low positivity rate in contemporary populations; intermediate risk associated with a negative test; limited value of wall motion beyond coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, stress echo has potential to adapt to a changing environment and overcome its current limitations.

INTEGRATED-QUADRUPLE STRESS-ECHO

Four parameters now converge conceptually, logistically, and methodologically in the Integrated Quadruple (IQ)-stress echo. They are: 1- regional wall motion abnormalities; 2-B-lines measured by lung ultrasound; 3-left ventricular contractile reserve assessed as the stress/rest ratio of force (systolic arterial pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/end-systolic volume from 2D); 4- coronary flow velocity reserve on left anterior descending coronary artery (with color-Doppler guided pulsed wave Doppler). IQ-Stress echo allows a synoptic functional assessment of epicardial coronary artery stenosis (wall motion), lung water (B-lines), myocardial function (left ventricular contractile reserve) and coronary small vessels (coronary flow velocity reserve in mid or distal left anterior descending artery). In "ABCD" protocol, A stands for Asynergy (ischemic vs non-ischemic heart); B for B-lines (wet vs dry lung); C for Contractile reserve (weak vs strong heart); D for Doppler flowmetry (warm vs cold heart, since the hyperemic blood flow increases the local temperature of the myocardium). From the technical (acquisition/analysis) viewpoint and required training, B-lines are the kindergarten, left ventricular contractile reserve the primary (for acquisition) and secondary (for analysis) school, wall motion the university, and coronary flow velocity reserve the PhD program of stress echo.

CONCLUSION

Stress echo is changing. As an old landline telephone with only one function, yesterday stress echo used one sign (regional wall motion abnormalities) for one patient with coronary artery disease. As a versatile smart-phone with multiple applications, stress echo today uses many signs for different pathophysiological and clinical targets. Large scale effectiveness studies are now in progress in the Stress Echo2020 project with the omnivorous "ABCD" protocol.

Integrated quadruple stress echocardiography

Stress echocardiography (SE) is an established diagnostic technique. For 40 years, the cornerstone of the technique has been the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), due to the underlying physiologically-relevant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. In the last decade, three new parameters (more objective than RWMA) have shown the potential to integrate and complement RWMA: 1) B-lines, also known as ultrasound lung comets, as a marker of extravascular lung water, measured using lung ultrasound with the 4-site simplified scan symmetrically of the antero-lateral thorax on the third intercostal space, from mid-axillary to anterior axillary and mid-clavicular line; 2) left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR), assessed as the peak stress/rest ratio of left ventricular force, also known as elastance (systolic arterial pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/end-systolic volume from 2D echocardiography); 3) coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) on left anterior descending coronary artery, calculated as peak stress/rest ratio of diastolic peak flow velocity assessed using pulsed-wave Doppler. The 4 parameters (RWMA, B-lines, LVCR and CFVR) now converge conceptually, logistically, and methodologically in the Integrated Quadruple (IQ)-SE. IQ-SE optimizes the versatility of SE to include in a one-stop shop the core "ABCD" (asynergy+B-lines+contractile reserve+Doppler flowmetry) protocol. It allows a synoptic assessment of parameters mirroring the epicardial artery stenosis (RWMA), interstitial lung water (B-lines), myocardial function (LVCR) and small coronary vessels (CFVR). Each variable has a clear clinical correlate, different and complementary to all others: RWMA identify an ischemic vs. non-ischemic heart; B-lines a wet vs. dry lung; LVCR a strong vs. weak heart; CFVR a warm vs. cold heart. IQ-SE is highly feasible, with minimal increase in the imaging and analysis time, and obvious diagnostic and prognostic impact also beyond coronary artery disease - especially in heart failure. Large scale effectiveness studies with IQ-SE are now under way with the Stress Echo 2020 Study, and will provide the necessary evidence base prior to large scale acceptance of the technique.

Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Stress Testing Among US Patients Younger Than 65 Years

Background

Scientific statements have championed the measurement of clinical outcomes after cardiac stress testing to better define their value. Using contemporary national data, we sought to describe the characteristics of patients who experience outcomes after stress testing.

Methods and Results

Using administrative claims from a large national private insurer, we conducted an observational cohort study of patients without cardiovascular disease aged 25 to 64 years who underwent stress testing from 2006 to 2011 and had at least 1 year of membership in the insurance company before and after testing. We used Kaplan–Meier time‐to‐event analyses to determine rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), elective coronary revascularization, and coronary angiography without revascularization in the year following testing. We used logistic regression to determine factors associated with outcomes, and stratified the cohort into quintiles based on likelihood of experiencing AMI and/or revascularization to describe the characteristics of patients at highest and lowest risk. Among 553 027 patients who underwent stress testing (mean age 50 years, 49% women, 73% white), 0.8% were hospitalized for AMI, 1.8% underwent elective coronary revascularization, and 2.5% underwent coronary angiography without revascularization within 1 year. Patients who were older, male, and white were more likely to undergo subsequent revascularization. Patients in the lowest likelihood quintile were young (mean age 40 years), frequently women (84.7%), had a low incidence of coexisting conditions (5.2% with diabetes mellitus), and had a 0.5% rate of AMI and/or revascularization.

Conclusions

The proportion of US patients younger than 65 who had AMI and/or coronary revascularization after stress testing was low. Assessing risk of subsequent outcomes may be useful in improving patient referrals for stress testing.