Interrater Reliability of Clinical Grading Measures for Cutaneous Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Mortality in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease

Importance

Chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is associated with impaired quality of life and symptom burden. The independent association of skin involvement with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their utility as a clinical prognostic marker remain unknown. Identification of patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD and impaired PROs could assist in initial risk stratification and treatment selection.

Objective

To compare the association of sclerotic and epidermal-type chronic GVHD with longitudinal PROs and to evaluate whether PROs can identify patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD at high risk for death.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter prospective cohort study involved patients from the Chronic GVHD Consortium of 9 US medical centers, enrolled between August 2007 and April 2012, and followed up until December 2020. Participants included adults 18 years and older with a diagnosis of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression and with skin involvement during the study period.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed using the Lee Symptom Scale (LSS) skin subscale with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Quality of life was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT) instrument with lower scores indicating worse outcomes. Nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, and their association with PROs at diagnosis were also assessed.

Results

Among 436 patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD (median [IQR] age at transplant, 51 [41.5-56.6] years; 261 [59.9%] male), 229 patients had epidermal-type chronic GVHD (52.5%), followed by 131 with sclerotic chronic GVHD (30.0%), and 76 with combination disease (17.4%). After adjusting for confounders, patients with sclerotic chronic GVHD had mean FACT-BMT scores 6.1 points worse than those with epidermal disease (95% CI, 11.7-0.4; P = .04). Patients with combination disease had mean LSS skin subscale scores 9.0 points worse than those with epidermal disease (95% CI, 4.2-13.8; P < .001). Clinically meaningful differences were defined as at least 7 points lower for FACT-BMT and 11 points higher for LSS skin subscale. At diagnosis, clinically meaningful worsening in FACT-BMT score was associated with an adjusted odds of nonrelapse mortality increased by 9.1% (95% CI, 2.0%-16.7%; P = .01). Similarly, for clinically meaningful worsening in LSS skin subscale score, adjusted odds of nonrelapse mortality increased by 16.4% (95% CI, 5.4%-28.5%; P = .003). These associations held true after adjusting for clinical severity by the National Institutes of Health Skin Score.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study demonstrated that skin chronic GVHD was independently associated with long-term PRO impairment, with sclerotic and combination disease carrying the highest morbidity. The degree of impairment at skin chronic GVHD diagnosis was a prognostic marker for mortality. Therefore, PROs could be useful for risk stratification and treatment selection in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II: Disease activity grading and therapeutic management

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and a leading cause of long-term morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and impaired health-related quality of life. The skin is commonly affected and presents heterogeneously, making the role of dermatologists critical in both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, new clinical classification and grading schemes inform treatment algorithms, which now include 3 Federal Drug Administration-approved therapies, and evolving transplant techniques are changing disease epidemiology. Part I reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of cGVHD. Part II discusses disease grading and therapeutic management.

Interrater reproducibility of the Myoton and durometer devices to quantify sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a severe complication in long-term survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This disease is challenging to manage clinically due to a lack of validated tools to quantitatively measure skin sclerosis. The current gold standard for measuring skin sclerosis is the NIH Skin Score which has only moderate agreement among clinicians and experts. To more accurately assess skin sclerosis in cGVHD, the Myoton and durometer devices can be used to directly measure biomechanical parameters of the skin. However, the reproducibility of these devices is not known in patients with cGVHD. To determine this reproducibility, three observers independently measured 10 anatomic sites in each of seven patients with sclerotic cGVHD using the Myoton and durometer. Clinical reproducibility was measured by mean pairwise differences (U-statistic) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Mean pairwise differences, expressed in true physical units, were used to report typical errors for each anatomic site and device. Mean pairwise differences were less than 11% of the average overall values for all five Myoton parameters and durometer hardness. These were lower for Myoton creep (4.1%), relaxation time (4.7%), and frequency (5.1%) than decrement (9.0%), stiffness (10.4%), and durometer hardness (9.0%). Myoton parameters creep, relaxation time, and frequency showed promise for capturing skin biomechanics more accurately than Myoton stiffness, decrement, or durometer hardness. Mean pairwise differences trended highest in the shin and volar forearm and lowest in the dorsal forearm. The interobserver ICC for overall (averaged across all measured body sites of a patient) creep (0.94; 95% CI 0.87-1.00), relaxation time (0.96; 95% CI 0.90-1.00), and frequency (0.95; 95% CI 0.88-1.00), trended higher than that for decrement (0.43; 95% CI 0.00-0.88), stiffness (0.92; 95% CI 0.81-1.00), and durometer hardness (0.82; 95% CI 0.61-1.00). Similar trends were observed in healthy participants. These findings can help clinicians design better studies to assess therapeutic response to new cGVHD treatments and support the interpretation of future measurements.

Methods to Assess Disease Activity and Severity in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Critical Literature Review

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a potentially debilitating complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, confers increased risk for mortality. Whereas treatment decisions rely on an accurate assessment of disease activity/severity, validated methods of assessing cutaneous cGVHD activity/severity appear to be limited. In this study, we aimed to identify and evaluate current data on the assessment of disease activity/severity in cutaneous cGVHD. Using modified PRISMA methods, we performed a critical literature review for relevant articles. Our literature search identified 1741 articles, of which 1635 were excluded as duplicates or failure to meet inclusion criteria. Of the included studies (n = 106), 39 (37%) addressed clinical and/or histopathologic parameters, 53 (50%) addressed serologic parameters, 8 (7.5%) addressed imaging parameters, and 6 (5.5%) addressed computer-based technologies. The only formally validated metric of disease activity/severity assessment in cutaneous cGVHD is the National Institutes of Health consensus scoring system, which is founded on clinical assessment alone. The lack of an objective marker for cGVHD necessitates further studies. An evaluation of the potential contributions of serologic, imaging, and/or computer-based technologies is warranted.