Snake-shaped ePTFE nasal tip graft combined with conchal cartilage in Asian rhinoplasty: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Lacking a nasal tip projection is a common deformity of Asian nasals. Various commonly used nasal tip grafts require dissecting septal perichondrium, most of them are autologous cartilage with a nonintegrated design. A snake-shaped expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) nasal tip graft is an integrated, stable tip graft without any additional assembly and splicing, conforming to the nasal anatomy characteristics of Asians.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed on Asian patients who underwent rhinoplasty in the nasal tip at Peking University Third Hospital from 2015 to 2022. Nasal tip grafts were categorized into three groups: snake-shaped ePTFE combined with conchal cartilage (n = 15), only costal cartilage (n = 25), and only conchal cartilage (n = 17). Patients were excluded if their rhinoplasty did not involve any of the grafts above. Visual Analogue Scale, FACE-Q Nose, FACE-Q Nostril, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale, and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scale were used to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative results.

RESULTS

Fifty-three (93.0%) cases had low nasal dorsum and 46 (80.7%) cases had short nose. There was no significant difference in complication rates among the three groups. The difference between preoperative and postoperative scale scores was statistically significant among the three groups (p < 0.05). Score improvements, including all scales, were the highest in the costal cartilage group and lowest in the conchal cartilage group.

CONCLUSIONS

Snake-shaped ePTFE nasal tip grafts can be an effective integrated alternative that provides long-term safety and efficacy compared with traditional autogenous implants (conchal and costal cartilages).

Saddle Nose Deformity Reconstruction with a Allograft Bone

OBJECTIVE

Providing lasting cosmetic and functional results for patients with saddle nose deformity with allograft.

METHODS

This report describes experience with using a of freeze-dried allograft bone allograft in 58 patients who underwent dorsal augmentation over 5-year period (2018-2023). Thirty-eight patients had saddle-shaped deformity of the nose, and 16 patients had post-traumatic cases with saddle nose deformities. All patients underwent a clinical examination using computed tomography. Before surgery using a 3D model, the graft was contoured according to the shape of the nasal defect. The grafts were installed using a closed approach and were placed under the periosteum of the bone. Using lateral photographs, anthropometric measurements of the nose were taken before and after surgery to assess aesthetic outcome after surgery. To assess the results of aesthetic rhinoplasty (UQ), the Portuguese version of the Utrecht Questionnaire was used, which contains a visual analogue scale (VAS) on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical procedure. No complications or major graft resorption was observed. An analysis comparing preoperative and 1-year follow-up data using 3D scanning showed a significant increase in dorsal height without dorsal expansion. After rhinoplasty, the mean visual analog scale (VAS) aesthetic score improved significant from 2.3 preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively 8.4, and 8.9 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The use of freeze-dried allograft bone is a useful method of dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty without donor site complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The current techniques in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

An essential aspect of rhinoplasty is the enhancement of the nasal dorsal contour by performing dorsal augmentation (DA) rhinoplasty. A wide range of techniques are available for DA as the demand for aesthetic nasal refinement grows. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current techniques used in DA rhinoplasty.

MAIN BODY

Research articles on DA rhinoplasty techniques were identified through a comprehensive literature search. Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science were used as electronic databases. Each database was searched for articles published since its inception. DA rhinoplasty techniques were examined in this literature review. Methodological quality was assessed for the selected studies, and data was extracted to examine materials used, surgical approaches, and reported outcomes for each technique. Various DA methods, including autologous grafts and synthetic implants, are examined in-depth in this review. Comparing approaches can help better understand their respective advantages and limitations.

CONCLUSION

A wealth of techniques is available for DA rhinoplasty, each with advantages. Patients' nasal anatomy, desired outcomes, and potential risks must be considered by surgeons when determining their surgical approach. DA methods continue to evolve rapidly, creating a need for a thorough understanding of the current landscape to make informed decisions.

Lollipop-Like Costal Cartilage Graft with a Peach-Shaped Head for East Asian Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Nasal tip refinement is a challenging step of East Asian rhinoplasty due to complex anatomical defects. Autologous costal cartilage grafts are commonly used to provide nasal tip support. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified technique using a lollipop-like cartilage graft with a peach-shaped head.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on Chinese patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty with the modified technique between November 2018 and March 2021 at our center. Preoperative and postoperative facial photographs, patient-reported outcome measures including the visual analog scale (VAS) and the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE), as well as surgery-related complications, were collected for outcome assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 31 adult patients were included in this retrospective cohort study, with a mean follow-up period of 17.12 ± 3.89 months. The majority of patients (28/31; 90.3%) expressed satisfaction with the aesthetic outcomes, as evidenced by a significant increase in mean VAS score from 3.97 ± 1.52 preoperatively to 7.39 ± 0.22 postoperatively (P < 0.01), and a significant increase in mean ROE score from 11.77 ± 2.33 to 17.22 ± 2.47 (P < 0.01). Photogrammetric analysis also demonstrated significant improvements in nasal anatomical measurements. Among the three patients with unsatisfactory feedback, two had mild columella deviations and one had a mild dorsum deviation. No other notable complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

The current study supports the safety and utility of the modified technique utilizing the lollipop-like costal cartilage graft with a peach-shaped head for major tip refinement in East Asian patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Complications Associated with Autologous Costal Cartilage Used in Rhinoplasty: An Updated Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the complications using autologous costal cartilage as grafts in rhinoplasty objectively and systematically with newly published literature.

METHODS

The literature was searched systematically; included studies were published between July of 1990 and April of 2020. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty studies involving 1648 patients were included for meta-analysis. The pooled rates of complications were 3.05% of warping (95% CI 1.36-5.19%), 1.2% of resorption (95% CI 0.26-2.56%), 1.45% of infection (95% CI 0.34-3.06%), and 1.53% of contour irregularity (95% CI 0.53-2.88%). The revision rate was 2.25% (95% CI 0.96-3.9%). Regarding of donor-site morbidities, the rate of hypertrophic chest scar was 2.08% (95% CI 0.31-4.83%), and the rate of pneumothorax was 0% (95% CI 0-0.46%). The pooled rates of complications were 9.06% (95% CI 6.13-12.43%) at the recipient site when complications at the recipient site did not include revision surgery, 1.47% (95% CI 0.17-3.56%) at the donor site, and 15.13% (95%CI 11.03-19.69%) overall. The recipient-site adverse event rate was 12.44% (95% CI 8.98-16.33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Warping was found the most common complication after rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage. Revision after rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage was increased in these years. Donor-site complications increased the complication rate after rhinoplasty using autologous rib cartilage by 22%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Histomorphological Findings of Cartilage and Surrounding Tissues According to Thickness and Manipulations in Rabbits

BACKGROUND

Costal cartilage is commonly employed as a dorsal implant in Asian rhinoplasty. To achieve better outcomes, it is important to know which types of costal cartilage are most appropriate for dorsal augmentation.

OBJECTIVES

The authors investigated how various forms of costal cartilage affect the surrounding tissues and their resorption over time, as well as their clinical appearance, using histomorphological analysis.

METHODS

Cartilage samples were collected from the anterior chest wall of 10 rabbits. Four forms of cartilage-2-mm solid block, 1-mm solid block, diced, and crushed-were prepared and inserted into the subcutaneous tissue pockets of the nasal dorsum of each rabbit. The animals were killed 3 and 6 months later, and graft specimens were examined.

RESULTS

Histomorphological analysis revealed important findings of the cartilage and surrounding tissues. The thickness of thick cartilage significantly decreased over time, but the thickness of thin cartilage did not significantly change (P = 0.038). Additionally, the thick cartilages showed a lower degree of vascularization than the thin cartilages (P < 0.001). A comparison of the cartilage forms revealed that the diced cartilages had better chondrocyte survival than the solid block cartilages (P < 0.001). Fat tissues were prominently observed surrounding the diced cartilages at 3 months (P = 0.01), and fibrosis was more prominently observed in the crushed cartilage than in the other types of cartilages (P = 0.04 and P = 0.005 at 3 and 6 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed differences in resorption depending on the thickness of the costal cartilage in rabbits. Among the various forms of costal cartilages, diced and thin solid-block cartilage were the best option for dorsal augmentation when considering long-term graft survival.

Current Practices in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty addresses the aesthetic and functional impairments caused by a deficient nasal dorsum. Augmentation rhinoplasty can be performed using a variety of different surgical techniques and grafting materials that all have distinct advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

Grafting materials have unique characteristics, uses, and safety profiles. A detailed overview of various grafting materials and their uses, risks, and benefits is provided.

RESULTS

Autologous grafting materials include septal cartilage, auricular cartilage, and costal cartilage. These donor sites can provide various amounts of en bloc or diced cartilage. Alternatively, bone may be used when strong structural stability is required, and soft tissue may be used to fill mild to moderate defects. Homologous grafts (e.g., irradiated and nonirradiated rib) and acellular dermal matrices are alternatives to autologous graft with many similar advantages and no need for an additional surgical site. Lastly, alloplastic implants may be successfully used for dorsal augmentation if both patient and surgeon understand their associated risks.

CONCLUSION

To perform successful dorsal augmentation, surgeons should be familiar with the wide variety of operative approaches and augmentation materials that are currently available and understand their risks, benefits, and uses.

Defining regional variation in nasal anatomy to guide ethnic rhinoplasty: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been increasing focus on understanding nasal anatomy in ethnic populations and using it to guide rhinoplasty techniques in non-Caucasian patients. Many disparate groups have historically been inappropriately clustered based on geography. However, there has been little attention on describing regional differences within these populations.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The search terms "African", "Asian", "Indian", "Middle Eastern", "Hispanic OR Mestizo", "rhinoplasty", "nasal", "anatomy", and "ethnic" were used in combination with the Boolean operators "AND" or "OR" to identify the initial search results. Papers were included if they originated from the specific geographic region of interest, if they specifically discussed patients of one particular nationality or sub-ethnicity, or if they discussed multiple anatomical subtypes within a specific ethnicity of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 81 papers were identified overall. The search identified 40 articles discussing Asian nasal anatomy, 8 articles discussing Indian nasal anatomy, 6 articles discussing African nasal anatomy, 9 articles discussing Middle Eastern nasal anatomy, and 19 papers discussing Latin American nasal anatomy. Numerous regional variants were described within each historic geographic phenotype. The majority of descriptions of Asian nasal anatomy were consistent with the classical definition, whereas nasal anatomy among the other ethnicities was more variable. Very little has been written about the geographic variation of nasal anatomy across the African continent. Several established sub-classification schemes exist for the Latin American nose.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of the heterogeneity of ethnic nasal anatomy is critical for surgeons performing rhinoplasty on non-Caucasian patients.

Prevalence of complications associated with polymer-based alloplastic materials in nasal dorsal augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Various techniques with different grafts and implants have been proposed to establish a smooth and symmetric nasal dorsum with adequate function. Broadly, two categories of materials have been used in this regard: alloplastic implant materials and autograft materials. The aim of these meta-analyses is to explore the incidence of complications after dorsum augmentation surgery using alloplastic materials.

Materials and methods

After duplication removal 491 papers remained that title and abstract were assessed for eligibility. Regarding the study type, 27 observational studies were included, 21 retrospective and 6 prospective case series. A total of 3803 cases were enrolled in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Result

Twenty-seven articles reported on complications and outcomes of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty with synthetic materials. In a random-effects model, the weighted mean percentage was 2.75% (95% CI 1.61 to 4.17%). the weighted mean percentage were 1.91% (95% CI 0.77 to 3.54%), 0.72% (95% CI 0.316 to 1.31%), and 0.78% (95% CI 0.43 to 1.24%) respectively.

Conclusion

The widely used alloplasts were expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), high-density polyethylene, and silicone. The total rates for complications, infection, deviation, irregularity, hematoma, extrusion, and overcorrection were 2.75%, 1.91%, 0.72%, 0.70%, 0.78%, and 0.49%, respectively. The revision rate, based on the random effects model, was 6.40% with 95%CI (3.84 to 9.57).

Trial registration

This meta-analysis was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number CRD42020209644).

Crushed Septal Cartilage-Covered Diced Cartilage Glue (CCDG) Graft: A Hybrid Technique of Crushed Septal Cartilage

BACKGROUND

Diced cartilage glue (DG) grafts have been widely used in dorsal augmentation but can induce dorsal irregularities. The authors evaluated the postoperative feasibility of a crushed septal cartilage-covered diced cartilage glue (CCDG) graft.

METHODS

The medical records of 38 patients who underwent dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty with an open approach were retrospectively reviewed. DG graft was used in 18 patients (47.4%), and CCDG graft was used in 20 patients (52.6%). Surgical outcomes were assessed by comparing anthropometric data on facial photographs and satisfaction questionnaires on aesthetic outcomes and palpable irregularities on nasal dorsum before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Both groups showed successful aesthetic outcomes. Dorsal height, radix height, and tip projection were all increased postoperatively in both groups. Tip rotation did not significantly increase (p > 0.05). Both groups showed similar outcomes in terms of aesthetic satisfaction but a significant difference in palpable irregularity. CCDG graft group showed significantly better (p = 0.04) satisfaction with dorsal irregularities (4.15 ± 0.75) than the DG graft group (3.56 ± 0.92). CCDG graft group also showed significantly better mean values (p = 0.048) in the degree of irregularity by two surgeons (3.85 ± 0.65) than the DG graft group (3.25 ± 0.97). No patient had significant complaints about irregular dorsum, and none of them underwent a revision rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSION

CCDG graft can be a complementary option for avoiding postoperative irregular dorsum complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Dorsal Augmentation

To manage the deficient nasal dorsum, a thorough knowledge of dorsal augmentation techniques should be mastered by the rhinoplasty specialist. Indications for dorsal augmentation may arise in both primary and revision rhinoplasty presentations. To direct operative planning, a complete facial analysis, noting the importance of maintaining overall nasofacial balance, is essential. An array of techniques, including autologous and nonautologous (ie, allogeneic and synthetic) sources, have been used globally-each carrying its own advantages and disadvantages. The authors believe autologous grafts to be the optimal source for dorsal augmentation because of their biocompatibility and ability to produce natural and long-lasting outcomes.

Long-Term Complications from Diced Cartilage in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-analysis

Objective: To analyze the incidences of long-term complications and revision surgery associated with diced cartilage grafts in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for clinical studies on the use of diced cartilage for dorsal augmentation published. A meta-analysis was conducted to pool the estimated rates of infection, overcorrection, visible irregularity, absorption, and revision surgery. Result: A total of 14 studies involving 2380 patients were included in the systematic review. The combined rates were 11.5% for overall complications and 5.3% for revision surgery. The rates of the most frequently reported complications were 4.5% for infection, 5.3% for visible irregularity, 0.7% for overcorrection, and 0.5% for absorption. There was no significant difference in the rates of visible irregularity (p = 0.23) and revision surgery (p = 0.71) among the wrapped diced cartilage, glued diced cartilage, and free diced cartilage groups. Conclusion: This meta-analysis presents the first comprehensive and quantitative report of long-term complications associated with diced cartilage in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. Infection and visible irregularity were the most frequently reported complications. The rates of irregularity and revision surgery were not correlated with the diced cartilage packing methods.

Lengthening of the Asian Nose

The Asian nose has its unique morphology and forms a significant proportion of noses treated by the rhinoplasty surgeon not only in Asia but also in other countries where the Asian diaspora resides. The anatomical features and dimensions of the Asian nose differ from noses of persons of African, Caucasian, Indian, and Middle Eastern origins, poses its own challenges, and warrants a unique set of techniques for its aesthetic improvement. In this article, we present an overview of the approach to the lengthening of the Asian nose, drawing from our own experience with managing the Asian nose and referencing the published literature on the subject.

Complications of Alloplast Rhinoplasty and Their Management: A Comprehensive Review

In Asian countries, augmentation rhinoplasty is especially common, where alloplastic implants are used much more commonly than autologous tissues. In rhinoplasty, such artificial materials include silicone, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE), and acellular human dermis. As the use of implants has become increasingly common in rhinoplasty, more adverse effects such as infection, extrusion, movement, irregularities, absorption, prolonged swelling, seroma, and contracture have been recognized and reported in the literature. Surgeons should be able to recognize these probable complications and manage them successfully. Early detection and prompt management of the complication are essential for minimizing the severity of the deformity. Proper management of complications is key for the success of dorsal augmentation using alloplastic implants.

Plasma polymer surface modified expanded polytetrafluoroethylene promotes epithelial monolayer formation in vitro and can be transplanted into the dystrophic rat subretinal space

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the surface modification of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) using an n-heptylamine (HA) plasma polymer would allow for functional epithelial monolayer formation suitable for subretinal transplant into a non-dystrophic rat model. Freshly isolated iris pigment epithelial (IPE) cells from two rat strains (Long Evans [LE] and Dark Agouti [DA]) were seeded onto HA, fibronectin-coated n-heptylamine modified (F-HA) and unmodified ePFTE and fibronectin-coated tissue culture (F-TCPS) substrates. Both F-HA ePTFE and F-TCPS substrates enabled functional monolayer formation with both strains of rat. Without fibronectin coating, only LE IPE formed a monolayer on HA-treated ePTFE. Functional assessment of both IPE strains on F-HA ePTFE demonstrated uptake of POS that increased significantly with time that was greater than control F-TCPS. Surgical optimization using Healon GV and mixtures of Healon GV: phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to induce retinal detachment demonstrated that only Healon GV:PBS allowed F-HA ePTFE substrates to be successfully transplanted into the subretinal space of Royal College of Surgeons rats, where they remained flat beneath the neural retina for up to 4 weeks. No apparent substrate-induced inflammatory response was observed by fundus microscopy or immunohistochemical analysis, indicating the potential of this substrate for future clinical applications.

Multicenter Pilot Study to Assess a Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Implant for Functional and Aesthetic Septorhinoplasty

Importance: A validated biomaterial would have several medical advantages in septorhinoplasties requiring a large-volume graft such as avoiding donor site morbidity, making ambulatory surgery possible, and reducing surgical costs. Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of a ceramic to treat saddle and crooked noses. The main endpoint was the biocompatibility of the implant. The secondary endpoint was its functional and aesthetic efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The nasal septum (NASEPT) study is a pilot multicenter noncomparative prospective phase IIa clinical trial. The biomaterial tested was a biphasic calcium phosphate implant composed of 75% hydroxyapatite and 25% beta tri calcium phosphate. This versatile material can be used to replace septal skeleton when it is absent or nonusable. We included 25 patients with a multifractured osseous and cartilaginous framework after several traumas or surgeries. The implant placement technique was identical to an extracorporeal septoplasty through the external approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary endpoint was the occurrence of expected adverse and severe adverse events. The secondary endpoints were clinical functional and aesthetic results and histological microscopic modifications. Results: Any extrusion, infection, pain, and epistaxis were observed. All implants were placed in a sagittal, straight, and solid position without extralobular depression. Comparisons between pre- and postoperative symptoms showed that nasal comfort (p < 10^-4) and quality of life (p < 10^-4) were dramatically improved in all patients. The nasolabial angle (p = 0.047) and the columellar projection (p = 0.024) were improved after surgery. Histological data showed little submucosal inflammation at 6 months with well-differentiated epithelium. The mean follow-up was 23 months: three patients underwent revision surgery for functional or aesthetic details and four implants were removed (16%) owing to a foreign body reaction between 17 and 74 months. Conclusion and Relevance: The NASEPT implant meets functional and aesthetic requirements in complex septorhinoplasties but its long-term biocompatibility needs to be improved. It could potentially avoid donor site morbidity.

Comparison of Autologous vs Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Augmentation rhinoplasty requires adding cartilage to provide enhanced support to the structure of the nose. Autologous costal cartilage and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are well-accepted rhinoplasty options. Tutoplast is another alternative cartilage source. No studies, to our knowledge, have definitively demonstrated a higher rate of complications with IHCC grafts compared with autologous costal cartilage grafts.

Objective

To compare rates of outcomes in the published literature for patients undergoing septorhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage vs IHCC grafts vs Tutoplast grafts.

Data Sources

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for articles published from database inception to February 2019 using the following keywords: septorhinoplasty, rhinoplasty, autologous costal cartilage graft, cadaveric cartilage graft, and rib graft.

Study Selection

Abstracts and full texts were reviewed in duplicate, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Only patients who underwent an en bloc dorsal onlay graft were included for comparison to ensure a homogenous study sample. A total of 1308 results were found. After duplicate records were removed, 576 unique citations remained. Studies were published worldwide between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2017.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Independent extraction by 2 authors was performed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All reported outcomes after septorhinoplasty and rates of graft warping, resorption, infection, contour irregularity, and revision surgery among patients receiving autologous grafts vs IHCC vs Tutoplast cartilage grafts.

Results

Of 576 unique citations, 54 studies were included in our systematic review; 28 studies were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our search captured 1041 patients of whom 741 received autologous grafts and 293 received IHCC grafts (regardless of type). When autologous cartilage (n = 748) vs IHCC (n = 153) vs Tutoplast cartilage (n = 140) grafts were compared, no difference in warping (5%; 95% CI, 3%-9%), resorption (2%; 95% CI, 0%-2%), contour irregularity (1%; 95% CI, 0%-3%), infection (2%; 95% CI, 0%-4%), or revision surgery (5%; 95% CI, 2%-9%) was found.

Conclusions and Relevance

No difference was found in outcomes between autologous and homologous costal cartilage grafts, including rates of warping, resorption, infection, contour irregularity, or revisions, in patients undergoing dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. En bloc dorsal onlay grafts are commonly used in augmentation rhinoplasty to provide contour and structure to the nasal dorsum.

Use of Nasal Implants and Dorsal Modification When Treating the East Asian Nose

Dorsal augmentation and tip surgery are essential procedures for East Asians seeking rhinoplasty, because they generally have thicker skin and poorly developed nasal dorsum and tip. For dorsal augmentation, many Asian surgeons prefer using alloplastic material, like silicone, Gore-Tex, and filler injection, for cost-effectiveness, easy handling, and short operation times. Compared with autologous implant materials, the use of synthetic implant is suggested to be associated with many complications, such as infection, extrusion, and deviation. However, even with the use of the autologous material, problems such as reabsorption after grafting, donor site complications can take place.

Safety and Efficacy of Cosmetic Augmentation of the Nasal Tip and Nasal Dorsum With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is a widely used alloplast, but studies of augmentation of the nasal tip and nasal dorsum with ePTFE are lacking.

Objective

To investigate whether attaching the conchal cartilage as shield grafts at the distal end of the graft can prevent extrusion and whether the use of ePTFE in the nasal tip can achieve a stable aesthetic outcome.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A randomized clinical trial was performed from April 1, 2006, to October 31, 2008. Follow-up was completed in 2012 and 2017. The study was conducted at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. One hundred fifty patients seeking rhinoplasty were recruited, and 129 were eligible for inclusion in the study. All the recruited patients were intent-to-treat populations who were randomized into 2 groups: an ePTFE-only group and an ePTFE with conchal cartilage group.

Interventions

Expanded PTFE was used for augmentation of the nasal tip and nasal dorsum in both groups. Conchal cartilage was placed above the distal end in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Preoperative and postoperative standard photographs were obtained. Postoperative satisfaction and complications were evaluated.

Results

Of the 129 patients (mean age [range], 28 years [21-45 years]; 6 male and 123 female) eligible for inclusion in this study, 76 (mean age [range], 31 years [22-45 years]; 4 male and 72 female) were available for follow-up (mean [range], 106.9 months [100-131 months]) through 2017, including 39 in the ePTFE-only group and 37 in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group. Infection occurred in 2 patients (5%) in the ePTFE-only group vs 1 patient (3%) in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group (infection rate [OR, 1.946; 95% CI, 0.169-22.413; P > .99]). Soft-tissue reaction occurred in 0 patients in the ePTFE-only group vs 1 patient (3%) in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group (soft-tissue reaction rate [OR, 0.000; 95% CI, 0.000-8.538; P = .49]). Irregularity occurred in 0 patients in the ePTFE-only group vs 3 patients (8%) in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group (irregularity rate [OR, 0.000; 95% CI, 0.000-1.066; P = .11]). Extrusion occurred in neither of the 2 groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

A new technique using ePTFE alone for augmentation of the nasal tip and nasal dorsum achieved safe, attractive, and acceptable outcomes in nasal contouring and patient satisfaction. The use of conchal cartilage as a shield in the nasal tip is not necessary.

Level of Evidence

1.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17011101.

Preventing nasal airway collapse with irradiated homologous costal cartilage versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: a novel animal model for nasal airway reconstruction

Airway collapse can occur when the forces of inhalation overpower the strength of the nasal lining flap. The authors established an animal model of the reconstructed nasal airway, and examined mechanical properties of tissue composites based on various materials. Twenty-three Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three experimental groups: control (n = 5), irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC, n = 10), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE, n = 8). Two dorsal skin flaps represented nasal lining and skin envelope. No framework, an IHCC or ePTFE rim graft was used as framework. At three weeks, changes in the cross-sectional area of the lining flap were measured when negative pressure was applied. En-bloc specimens containing the graft and soft tissue were examined for histological change and tissue ingrowth. Reduction of cross-sectional area with simulated inhalation was 87.74% in the control group, 82.76% (IHCC), and 67.29% (ePTFE). Cross-sectional reduction was significantly less in ePTFE group than control group (p = 0.004) and IHCC group (p = 0.001). The difference was not significant in the control and IHCC groups. There was histologic evidence of tissue ingrowth in the ePTFE group. This novel animal model of nasal airway reconstruction supports the use and potential benefit of using ePTFE for prevention of airway collapse.