1
|
Cerda IH, Zhang E, Dominguez M, Ahmed M, Lang M, Ashina S, Schatman ME, Yong RJ, Fonseca ACG. Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality in Headache Disorder Diagnosis, Classification, and Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024:10.1007/s11916-024-01279-7. [PMID: 38836996 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01279-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review provides an overview of the current and future role of artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR) in addressing the complexities inherent to the diagnosis, classification, and management of headache disorders. RECENT FINDINGS Through machine learning and natural language processing approaches, AI offers unprecedented opportunities to identify patterns within complex and voluminous datasets, including brain imaging data. This technology has demonstrated promise in optimizing diagnostic approaches to headache disorders and automating their classification, an attribute particularly beneficial for non-specialist providers. Furthermore, AI can enhance headache disorder management by enabling the forecasting of acute events of interest, such as migraine headaches or medication overuse, and by guiding treatment selection based on insights from predictive modeling. Additionally, AI may facilitate the streamlining of treatment efficacy monitoring and enable the automation of real-time treatment parameter adjustments. VR technology, on the other hand, offers controllable and immersive experiences, thus providing a unique avenue for the investigation of the sensory-perceptual symptomatology associated with certain headache disorders. Moreover, recent studies suggest that VR, combined with biofeedback, may serve as a viable adjunct to conventional treatment. Addressing challenges to the widespread adoption of AI and VR in headache medicine, including reimbursement policies and data privacy concerns, mandates collaborative efforts from stakeholders to enable the equitable, safe, and effective utilization of these technologies in advancing headache disorder care. This review highlights the potential of AI and VR to support precise diagnostics, automate classification, and enhance management strategies for headache disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily Zhang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Moises Dominguez
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Min Lang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sait Ashina
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health-Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - R Jason Yong
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Alexandra C G Fonseca
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mazzolenis ME, Bulat E, Schatman ME, Gumb C, Gilligan CJ, Yong RJ. The Ethical Stewardship of Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Pain and Headache: A Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024:10.1007/s11916-024-01272-0. [PMID: 38809404 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01272-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are becoming more pervasive in medicine, understanding their ethical considerations for chronic pain and headache management is crucial for optimizing their safety. RECENT FINDINGS We reviewed thirty-eight editorial and original research articles published between 2018 and 2023, focusing on the application of AI and ML to chronic pain or headache. The core medical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice constituted the evaluation framework. The AI applications addressed topics such as pain intensity prediction, diagnostic aides, risk assessment for medication misuse, empowering patients to self-manage their conditions, and optimizing access to care. Virtually all AI applications aligned both positively and negatively with specific medical ethics principles. This review highlights the potential of AI to enhance patient outcomes and physicians' experiences in managing chronic pain and headache. We emphasize the importance of carefully considering the advantages, disadvantages, and unintended consequences of utilizing AI tools in chronic pain and headache, and propose the four core principles of medical ethics as an evaluation framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Emilia Mazzolenis
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Evgeny Bulat
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Population Health - Division of Medical Ethics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chris Gumb
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Christopher J Gilligan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Robert J Yong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han R, Acosta JN, Shakeri Z, Ioannidis JPA, Topol EJ, Rajpurkar P. Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review. Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6:e367-e373. [PMID: 38670745 PMCID: PMC11068159 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(24)00047-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
This scoping review of randomised controlled trials on artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice reveals an expanding interest in AI across clinical specialties and locations. The USA and China are leading in the number of trials, with a focus on deep learning systems for medical imaging, particularly in gastroenterology and radiology. A majority of trials (70 [81%] of 86) report positive primary endpoints, primarily related to diagnostic yield or performance; however, the predominance of single-centre trials, little demographic reporting, and varying reports of operational efficiency raise concerns about the generalisability and practicality of these results. Despite the promising outcomes, considering the likelihood of publication bias and the need for more comprehensive research including multicentre trials, diverse outcome measures, and improved reporting standards is crucial. Future AI trials should prioritise patient-relevant outcomes to fully understand AI's true effects and limitations in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Han
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; University of California Los Angeles-Caltech Medical Scientist Training Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Julián N Acosta
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Rad AI, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zahra Shakeri
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eric J Topol
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Pranav Rajpurkar
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hirani R, Noruzi K, Khuram H, Hussaini AS, Aifuwa EI, Ely KE, Lewis JM, Gabr AE, Smiley A, Tiwari RK, Etienne M. Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare: A Journey through History, Present Innovations, and Future Possibilities. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:557. [PMID: 38792579 PMCID: PMC11122160 DOI: 10.3390/life14050557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in healthcare significantly impacting practices from diagnostics to treatment delivery and patient management. This article examines the progress of AI in healthcare, starting from the field's inception in the 1960s to present-day innovative applications in areas such as precision medicine, robotic surgery, and drug development. In addition, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the acceleration of the use of AI in technologies such as telemedicine and chatbots to enhance accessibility and improve medical education is also explored. Looking forward, the paper speculates on the promising future of AI in healthcare while critically addressing the ethical and societal considerations that accompany the integration of AI technologies. Furthermore, the potential to mitigate health disparities and the ethical implications surrounding data usage and patient privacy are discussed, emphasizing the need for evolving guidelines to govern AI's application in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahim Hirani
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA; (R.H.)
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| | - Kaleb Noruzi
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA; (R.H.)
| | - Hassan Khuram
- College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA
| | - Anum S. Hussaini
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Esewi Iyobosa Aifuwa
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA; (R.H.)
| | - Kencie E. Ely
- Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA
| | - Joshua M. Lewis
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA; (R.H.)
| | - Ahmed E. Gabr
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA; (R.H.)
| | - Abbas Smiley
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Raj K. Tiwari
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA; (R.H.)
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| | - Mill Etienne
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA; (R.H.)
- Department of Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abd-Elsayed A, Robinson CL, Marshall Z, Diwan S, Peters T. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:229-238. [PMID: 38345695 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review explores the current applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of pain medicine with a focus on machine learning. RECENT FINDINGS Utilizing a literature search conducted through the PubMed database, several current trends were identified, including the use of AI as a tool for diagnostics, predicting pain progression, predicting treatment response, and performance of therapy and pain management. Results of these studies show promise for the improvement of patient outcomes. Current gaps in the research and subsequent directions for future study involve AI in optimizing and improving nerve stimulation and more thoroughly predicting patients' responses to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
| | - Christopher L Robinson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sudhir Diwan
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Theodore Peters
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 750 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53726, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aintabi D, Greenberg G, Berinstein JA, DeJonckheere M, Wray D, Sripada RK, Saini SD, Higgins PDR, Cohen-Mekelburg S. Remote Between Visit Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care: A Qualitative Study of CAPTURE-IBD Participants and Care Team Members. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2024; 6:otae032. [PMID: 38736840 PMCID: PMC11087934 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otae032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We recently showed that CAPTURE-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-a care coordination intervention comprised of routine remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and a care coordinator-triggered care pathway-was more effective at reducing symptom burden for patients with IBD compared to usual care. We aimed to understand how patients and care team providers experienced the intervention and evaluate purported mechanisms of action to plan for future implementation. Methods In this study, 205 patients were randomized to CAPTURE-IBD (n = 100) or usual care(n = 105). We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 of the 100 participants in the CAPTURE-IBD arm and 5 care team providers to achieve thematic saturation. We used qualitative rapid analysis to generate a broad understanding of experiences, perceived impact, the coordinator role, and suggested improvements. Results Findings highlight that the intervention was acceptable and user-friendly, despite concerns regarding increased nursing workload. Both participants and care team providers perceived the intervention as valuable in supporting symptom monitoring, psychosocial care, and between-visit action plans to improve IBD care and health outcomes. However, few participants leveraged the care coordinator as intended. Finally, participants reported that the intervention could be better tailored to capture day-to-day symptom changes and to meet the needs of patients with specific comorbid conditions (eg, ostomies). Conclusions Remote PRO monitoring is acceptable and may be valuable in improving care management, promoting tight control, and supporting whole health in IBD. Future efforts should focus on testing and implementing refined versions of CAPTURE-IBD tailored to different clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aintabi
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Health System, Ypsilanti, MI, USA
| | - Gillian Greenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Berinstein
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Daniel Wray
- Twine Clinical Consulting, Park City, Utah, USA
| | - Rebecca K Sripada
- Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sameer D Saini
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Peter D R Higgins
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Shirley Cohen-Mekelburg
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rozman de Moraes A, Erdogan E, Azhar A, Reddy SK, Lu Z, Geller JA, Graves DM, Kubiak MJ, Williams JL, Wu J, Bruera E, Yennurajalingam S. Scheduled and Breakthrough Opioid Use for Cancer Pain in an Inpatient Setting at a Tertiary Cancer Hospital. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1335-1347. [PMID: 38534934 PMCID: PMC10969060 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Our aim was to examine the frequency and prescription pattern of breakthrough (BTO) and scheduled (SCH) opioids and their ratio (BTO/SCH ratio) of use, prior to and after referral to an inpatient supportive care consult (SCC) for cancer pain management (CPM). Methods and Materials: Patients admitted at the MD Anderson Cancer Center and referred to a SCC were retrospectively reviewed. Cancer patients receiving SCH and BTO opioids for ≥24 h were eligible for inclusion. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, including the type and route of SCH and BTO opioids, daily opioid doses (MEDDs) of SCH and BTO, and BTO/SCH ratios were reviewed in patients seen prior to a SCC (pre-SCC) and during a SCC. A normal BTO ratio was defined as 0.5-0.2. Results: A total of 665/728 (91%) patients were evaluable. Median pain scores (p < 0.001), BTO MEDDs (p < 0.001), scheduled opioid MEDDs (p < 0.0001), and total MEDDs (p < 0.0001) were higher, but the median number of BTO doses was fewer (2 vs. 4, p < 0.001), among patients seen at SCC compared to pre-SCC. A BTO/SCH ratio over the recommended ratio (>0.2) was seen in 37.5% of patients. The BTO/SCH ratios in the pre-SCC and SCC groups were 0.10 (0.04, 0.21) and 0.17 (0.10, 0.30), respectively, p < 0.001. Hydromorphone and Morphine were the most common BTO and SCH opioids prescribed, respectively. Patients in the early supportive care group had higher pain scores and MEDDs. Conclusions: BTO/SCH ratios are frequently prescribed higher than the recommended dose. Daily pain scores, BTO MEDDs, scheduled opioid MEDDs, and total MEDDs were higher among the SCC group than the pre-SCC group, but the number of BTO doses/day was lower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Rozman de Moraes
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Elif Erdogan
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Ahsan Azhar
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Suresh K. Reddy
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Zhanni Lu
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Joshua A. Geller
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - David Mill Graves
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Michal J. Kubiak
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Janet L. Williams
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Jimin Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| | - Sriram Yennurajalingam
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation Medicine, and Integrative Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (A.R.d.M.); (E.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Martindale APL, Ng B, Ngai V, Kale AU, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Golub RM, Collins GS, Moher D, McCradden MD, Oakden-Rayner L, Rivera SC, Calvert M, Kelly CJ, Lee CS, Yau C, Chan AW, Keane PA, Beam AL, Denniston AK, Liu X. Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1619. [PMID: 38388497 PMCID: PMC10883966 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45355-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension for Artificial Intelligence interventions (CONSORT-AI) was published in September 2020. Since its publication, several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of AI interventions have been published but their completeness and transparency of reporting is unknown. This systematic review assesses the completeness of reporting of AI RCTs following publication of CONSORT-AI and provides a comprehensive summary of RCTs published in recent years. 65 RCTs were identified, mostly conducted in China (37%) and USA (18%). Median concordance with CONSORT-AI reporting was 90% (IQR 77-94%), although only 10 RCTs explicitly reported its use. Several items were consistently under-reported, including algorithm version, accessibility of the AI intervention or code, and references to a study protocol. Only 3 of 52 included journals explicitly endorsed or mandated CONSORT-AI. Despite a generally high concordance amongst recent AI RCTs, some AI-specific considerations remain systematically poorly reported. Further encouragement of CONSORT-AI adoption by journals and funders may enable more complete adoption of the full CONSORT-AI guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Ng
- Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Christ Church, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Victoria Ngai
- University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - Aditya U Kale
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Robert M Golub
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine//UK EQUATOR Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottowa, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa D McCradden
- Department of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genetics & Genome Biology Research Program, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research & Learning, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Clinical and Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Christopher Yau
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pearse A Keane
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Andrew L Beam
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard. T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shrivastava M, Ye L. Neuroimaging and artificial intelligence for assessment of chronic painful temporomandibular disorders-a comprehensive review. Int J Oral Sci 2023; 15:58. [PMID: 38155153 PMCID: PMC10754947 DOI: 10.1038/s41368-023-00254-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic Painful Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) are challenging to diagnose and manage due to their complexity and lack of understanding of brain mechanism. In the past few decades' neural mechanisms of pain regulation and perception have been clarified by neuroimaging research. Advances in the neuroimaging have bridged the gap between brain activity and the subjective experience of pain. Neuroimaging has also made strides toward separating the neural mechanisms underlying the chronic painful TMD. Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming various sectors by automating tasks that previously required humans' intelligence to complete. AI has started to contribute to the recognition, assessment, and understanding of painful TMD. The application of AI and neuroimaging in understanding the pathophysiology and diagnosis of chronic painful TMD are still in its early stages. The objective of the present review is to identify the contemporary neuroimaging approaches such as structural, functional, and molecular techniques that have been used to investigate the brain of chronic painful TMD individuals. Furthermore, this review guides practitioners on relevant aspects of AI and how AI and neuroimaging methods can revolutionize our understanding on the mechanisms of painful TMD and aid in both diagnosis and management to enhance patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Shrivastava
- Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Liang Ye
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kovoor JG, Nann SD, Barot DD, Garg D, Hains L, Stretton B, Ovenden CD, Bacchi S, Chan E, Gupta AK, Hugh TJ. Prehabilitation for general surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2411-2425. [PMID: 37675939 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehabilitation seeks to optimize patient health before surgery to improve outcomes. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted on prehabilitation, however an updated synthesis of this evidence is required across General Surgery to inform potential Supplementary discipline-level protocols. Accordingly, this systematic review of RCTs aimed to evaluate the use of prehabilitation interventions across the discipline of General Surgery. METHODS This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023403289), and adhered to PRISMA 2020 and SWiM guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid Embase were searched to 4 March 2023 for RCTs evaluating prehabilitation interventions within the discipline of General Surgery. After data extraction, risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Quantitative and qualitative data were synthesized and analysed. However, meta-analysis was precluded due to heterogeneity across included studies. RESULTS From 929 records, 36 RCTs of mostly low risk of bias were included. 17 (47.2%) were from Europe, and 14 (38.9%) North America. 30 (83.3%) investigated cancer populations. 31 (86.1%) investigated physical interventions, finding no significant difference in 16 (51.6%) and significant improvement in 14 (45.2%). Nine (25%) investigated psychological interventions: six (66.7%) found significant improvement, three (33.3%) found no significant difference. Five (13.9%) investigated nutritional interventions, finding no significant difference in three (60%), and significant improvement in two (40%). CONCLUSIONS Prehabilitation interventions showed mixed levels of effectiveness, and there is insufficient RCT evidence to suggest system-level delivery across General Surgery within standardized protocols. However, given potential benefits and non-inferiority to standard care, they should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua G Kovoor
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Silas D Nann
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Dwarkesh D Barot
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Devanshu Garg
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lewis Hains
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Brandon Stretton
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher D Ovenden
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Erick Chan
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Aashray K Gupta
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Health and Information, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Thomas J Hugh
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Adams MCB, Nelson AM, Narouze S. Daring discourse: artificial intelligence in pain medicine, opportunities and challenges. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:439-442. [PMID: 37169486 PMCID: PMC10525018 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are currently expanding their influence within healthcare. For pain clinics, unfettered introduction of AI may cause concern in both patients and healthcare teams. Much of the concern stems from the lack of community standards and understanding of how the tools and algorithms function. Data literacy and understanding can be challenging even for experienced healthcare providers as these topics are not incorporated into standard clinical education pathways. Another reasonable concern involves the potential for encoding bias in healthcare screening and treatment using faulty algorithms. And yet, the massive volume of data generated by healthcare encounters is increasingly challenging for healthcare teams to navigate and will require an intervention to make the medical record manageable in the future. AI approaches that lighten the workload and support clinical decision-making may provide a solution to the ever-increasing menial tasks involved in clinical care. The potential for pain providers to have higher-quality connections with their patients and manage multiple complex data sources might balance the understandable concerns around data quality and decision-making that accompany introduction of AI. As a specialty, pain medicine will need to establish thoughtful and intentionally integrated AI tools to help clinicians navigate the changing landscape of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith C B Adams
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Biomedical Informatics, Physiology & Pharmacology, and Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ariana M Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Singhal M, Gupta L, Hirani K. A Comprehensive Analysis and Review of Artificial Intelligence in Anaesthesia. Cureus 2023; 15:e45038. [PMID: 37829964 PMCID: PMC10566398 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In the field of anaesthesia, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a game-changing technology. Applications of AI include keeping records, monitoring patients, calculating and administering drugs, and carrying out mechanical procedures. This article explores the current uses, challenges, and prospective applications of AI in anaesthesia practices. This review discusses AI-supported systems like anaesthesia information management systems (AIMS), mechanical robots for carrying out procedures, and pharmacological models for drug delivery. AIMS has helped in automated record-keeping, predicting bad events, and monitoring the vital signs of the patient. Their application has a vital role in improving the efficacy of anaesthesia management and patient safety. The application of AI in anaesthesia comes with its own unique difficulties. Noteworthy obstacles include issues with data quantity and quality, technical limitations, and moral and legal dilemmas. The key to overcoming these barriers is to set guidelines for the ethical use of AI in healthcare, improve the reliability and comprehension of AI systems, and certify the health data precision and security. AI has very bright potential. Exciting future directions include developments in AI and machine learning thus development of new applications, and the possible enhancement in training and education. Potential research areas include the application of AI to chronic disease management, pain management, and the reinforcement of anaesthesiologists' education. AI could be used to design authentic lifelike training simulations and individualized student feedback systems, hence transforming anaesthesia education and training methodology. For this review, we conducted a PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database search in 2022-2023 and retrieved articles on AI and its uses in anaesthesia. Recommendations for future research and development include strengthening the safety and reliability of health data, building a better understanding of AI systems, and looking into new areas of use. The power of AI can be used to innovate anaesthesia practices by concentrating on these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghna Singhal
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, IND
| | - Lalit Gupta
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, IND
| | - Kshitiz Hirani
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, IND
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adogwa O, Reid MC, Chilakapati S, Makris UE. Clin-STAR corner: 2021 update in musculoskeletal pain in older adults with a focus on osteoarthritis-related pain. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:2373-2380. [PMID: 37186060 PMCID: PMC10524733 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain remains a leading cause of disability and functional impairment among older adults and is associated with substantial societal and personal costs. Chronic pain is particularly challenging to manage in older adults because of multimorbidity, concerns about treatment-related harm, as well as older adults' beliefs about pain and its management. This narrative review presents data on nine high-quality, peer-reviewed clinical trials published primarily over the past two years that focus on MSK pain management in older adults, of which four were comprehensively reviewed. These studies address contributors to knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain (insomnia), provide evidence for digital delivery or artificial intelligence driven behavioral interventions and potentially more efficient/equally effective modes of delivering glucocorticoids for OA; each of the selected studies have potential for scalability and meaningful impact in the care of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owoicho Adogwa
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - M. Cary Reid
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weil Cornell Medicine, NY, NY
| | - Sai Chilakapati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, TX
| | - Una E. Makris
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, TX
- Medical Service, Veterans Administration North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Karmakar A, Khan MJ, Abdul-Rahman MEF, Shahid U. The Advances and Utility of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Regional Anesthesia: An Overview of Recent Developments. Cureus 2023; 15:e44306. [PMID: 37779803 PMCID: PMC10535025 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in regional anesthesia has brought about transformative changes in acute pain management for surgical procedures. This review explores the evolving landscape of AI and robotics applications in regional anesthesia, outlining their potential benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations. AI-driven pain assessment, real-time guidance for needle placement during nerve blocks, and predictive modeling solutions for nerve blocks have the potential to enhance procedural precision and improve patient outcomes. Robotic technology aids in accurate needle insertion, reducing complications and improving pain relief. This review also highlights the ethical and safety considerations surrounding AI implementation, emphasizing data security and professional training. While challenges such as costs and regulatory hurdles exist, ongoing research and clinical trials demonstrate the practical utility of these technologies. In conclusion, AI and robotics have the potential to reshape regional anesthesia practice, ultimately improving patient care and procedural accuracy in pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arunabha Karmakar
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT
| | | | | | - Umair Shahid
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Golden SE, Unger S, Slatore CG. Implementing Smoking Cessation Telehealth Technologies Within the VHA: Lessons Learned. Fed Pract 2023; 40:256-260. [PMID: 37868257 PMCID: PMC10589000 DOI: 10.12788/fp.0393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Health care systems need to reach patients who are smokers and connect them to evidence-based resources that can help them quit. Telehealth, such as an interactive voice response (IVR) system, may be one solution, but there is no roadmap to develop or implement an IVR system within the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Observations We describe the development and implemention of IVR at the VA Portland Health Care System in Oregon to proactively reach veterans who use tobacco and connect them with cessation resources. We coordinated with local departments to verify the necessary processes and strategies that are important. We recommend several questions to ask the IVR vendor and be prepared to answer before contract finalization. The Patient Engagement, Tracking, and Long-term Support (PETALS) initiative may be an excellent place to start for VA IVR-related questions and can be used for IVR initiation within the VA, but other vendors will be needed for nonresearch purposes. Finally, we describe the process timeline and steps to help potential users. Conclusions IVR systems, once they are developed and implemented, can be efficient, low-cost, resource-nonintensive solutions that can effectively connect patients with needed health care services. Developing an IVR system within the VA was challenging for our research team. We experienced a large learning curve during implementation and hope that our experience and lessons will help VA personnel in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E Golden
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Oregon
| | | | - Christopher G Slatore
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Oregon
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Darnall BD, Edwards KA, Courtney RE, Ziadni MS, Simons LE, Harrison LE. Innovative treatment formats, technologies, and clinician trainings that improve access to behavioral pain treatment for youth and adults. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1223172. [PMID: 37547824 PMCID: PMC10397413 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1223172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is prevalent across the life span and associated with significant individual and societal costs. Behavioral interventions are recommended as the gold-standard, evidence-based interventions for chronic pain, but barriers, such as lack of pain-trained clinicians, poor insurance coverage, and high treatment burden, limit patients' ability to access evidenced-based pain education and treatment resources. Recent advances in technology offer new opportunities to leverage innovative digital formats to overcome these barriers and dramatically increase access to high-quality, evidenced-based pain treatments for youth and adults. This scoping review highlights new advances. First, we describe system-level barriers to the broad dissemination of behavioral pain treatment. Next, we review several promising new pediatric and adult pain education and treatment technology innovations to improve access and scalability of evidence-based behavioral pain treatments. Current challenges and future research and clinical recommendations are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth D. Darnall
- Stanford Pain Relief Innovations Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Karlyn A. Edwards
- Stanford Pain Relief Innovations Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Rena E. Courtney
- Salem VA Health Care System, PREVAIL Center for Chronic Pain, Salem, VA, United States
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | - Maisa S. Ziadni
- Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Laura E. Simons
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Lauren E. Harrison
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Piette JD, Thomas L, Newman S, Marinec N, Krauss J, Chen J, Wu Z, Bohnert ASB. An Automatically Adaptive Digital Health Intervention to Decrease Opioid-Related Risk While Conserving Counselor Time: Quantitative Analysis of Treatment Decisions Based on Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Reported Risk Measures. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e44165. [PMID: 37432726 PMCID: PMC10369305 DOI: 10.2196/44165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients prescribed opioid analgesic (OA) medications for pain experience serious side effects, including dependence, sedation, and overdose. As most patients are at low risk for OA-related harms, risk reduction interventions requiring multiple counseling sessions are impractical on a large scale. OBJECTIVE This study evaluates whether an intervention based on reinforcement learning (RL), a field of artificial intelligence, learned through experience to personalize interactions with patients with pain discharged from the emergency department (ED) and decreased self-reported OA misuse behaviors while conserving counselors' time. METHODS We used data representing 2439 weekly interactions between a digital health intervention ("Prescription Opioid Wellness and Engagement Research in the ED" [PowerED]) and 228 patients with pain discharged from 2 EDs who reported recent opioid misuse. During each patient's 12 weeks of intervention, PowerED used RL to select from 3 treatment options: a brief motivational message delivered via an interactive voice response (IVR) call, a longer motivational IVR call, or a live call from a counselor. The algorithm selected session types for each patient each week, with the goal of minimizing OA risk, defined in terms of a dynamic score reflecting patient reports during IVR monitoring calls. When a live counseling call was predicted to have a similar impact on future risk as an IVR message, the algorithm favored IVR to conserve counselor time. We used logit models to estimate changes in the relative frequency of each session type as PowerED gained experience. Poisson regression was used to examine the changes in self-reported OA risk scores over calendar time, controlling for the ordinal session number (1st to 12th). RESULTS Participants on average were 40 (SD 12.7) years of age; 66.7% (152/228) were women and 51.3% (117/228) were unemployed. Most participants (175/228, 76.8%) reported chronic pain, and 46.2% (104/225) had moderate to severe depressive symptoms. As PowerED gained experience through interactions over a period of 142 weeks, it delivered fewer live counseling sessions than brief IVR sessions (P=.006) and extended IVR sessions (P<.001). Live counseling sessions were selected 33.5% of the time in the first 5 weeks of interactions (95% CI 27.4%-39.7%) but only for 16.4% of sessions (95% CI 12.7%-20%) after 125 weeks. Controlling for each patient's changes during the course of treatment, this adaptation of treatment-type allocation led to progressively greater improvements in self-reported OA risk scores (P<.001) over calendar time, as measured by the number of weeks since enrollment began. Improvement in risk behaviors over time was especially pronounced among patients with the highest risk at baseline (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS The RL-supported program learned which treatment modalities worked best to improve self-reported OA risk behaviors while conserving counselors' time. RL-supported interventions represent a scalable solution for patients with pain receiving OA prescriptions. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02990377; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02990377.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Piette
- Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Health Behavior Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Laura Thomas
- Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Sean Newman
- Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Health Behavior Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Nicolle Marinec
- Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Health Behavior Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Joel Krauss
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Trinity Health St. Joseph Mercy, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jenny Chen
- Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Health Behavior Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Zhenke Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rohaj A, Bulaj G. Digital Therapeutics (DTx) Expand Multimodal Treatment Options for Chronic Low Back Pain: The Nexus of Precision Medicine, Patient Education, and Public Health. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11101469. [PMID: 37239755 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11101469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Digital therapeutics (DTx, software as a medical device) provide personalized treatments for chronic diseases and expand precision medicine beyond pharmacogenomics-based pharmacotherapies. In this perspective article, we describe how DTx for chronic low back pain (CLBP) can be integrated with pharmaceutical drugs (e.g., NSAIDs, opioids), physical therapy (PT), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and patient empowerment. An example of an FDA-authorized DTx for CLBP is RelieVRx, a prescription virtual reality (VR) app that reduces pain severity as an adjunct treatment for moderate to severe low back pain. RelieVRx is an immersive VR system that delivers at-home pain management modalities, including relaxation, self-awareness, pain distraction, guided breathing, and patient education. The mechanism of action of DTx is aligned with recommendations from the American College of Physicians to use non-pharmacological modalities as the first-line therapy for CLBP. Herein, we discuss how DTx can provide multimodal therapy options integrating conventional treatments with exposome-responsive, just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAI). Given the flexibility of software-based therapies to accommodate diverse digital content, we also suggest that music-induced analgesia can increase the clinical effectiveness of digital interventions for chronic pain. DTx offers opportunities to simultaneously address the chronic pain crisis and opioid epidemic while supporting patients and healthcare providers to improve therapy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarushi Rohaj
- The Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, L.S. Skaggs College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Grzegorz Bulaj
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, L.S. Skaggs College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Goldsmith ES, Miller WA, Koffel E, Ullman K, Landsteiner A, Stroebel B, Hill J, Ackland PE, Wilt TJ, Duan-Porter W. Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based psychotherapies for chronic pain in adults: A systematic review. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:742-769. [PMID: 36934826 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) have demonstrated effectiveness for improving outcomes in chronic pain. These evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) remain underutilized in clinical practice, however. To identify research gaps and next steps for improving uptake of EBPs, we conducted a systematic review of patient-, provider-, and system-level barriers and facilitators of their use for chronic pain. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases databases from inception through September 2022. Prespecified eligibility criteria included outpatient treatment of adults with chronic pain; examination of barriers and facilitators and/or evaluation of implementation strategies; conducted in the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), Ireland, Canada or Australia; and publication in English. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and rated quality. We conducted a qualitative synthesis of results using a best-fit framework approach building upon domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We identified 34 eligible studies (33 moderate or high quality), most (n=28) of which addressed patient-level factors. Shared barriers across EBPs included variable patient buy-in to therapy rationale and competing responsibilities for patients; shared facilitators included positive group or patient-therapist dynamics. Most studies examining ACT and all examining MBSR assessed only group formats. No studies compared barriers, facilitators, or implementation strategies of group CBT to individual CBT, or of telehealth to in-person EBPs. Conceptual mismatches of patient knowledge and beliefs with therapy principles were largely analyzed qualitatively, and studies did not explore how these mismatches were addressed to support engagement. Future research on EBPs for chronic pain in real-world practice settings is needed to explore provider and system-level barriers and facilitators, heterogeneity of effects and uptake, and both effects and uptake of EBPs delivered in various formats, including group vs. individual therapy and telehealth or asynchronous digital approaches. Perspective This systematic review synthesizes evidence on barriers and facilitators to uptake of cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic pain. Findings can guide future implementation work to increase availability and use of evidence-based psychotherapies for treatment of chronic pain. Registration: PROSPERO number CRD42021252038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Goldsmith
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Wendy A Miller
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Erin Koffel
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristen Ullman
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Veterans Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Adrienne Landsteiner
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Veterans Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Benjamin Stroebel
- Department of Dermatology, University of California - San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Hill
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA
| | - Princess E Ackland
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy J Wilt
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Veterans Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Wei Duan-Porter
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Veterans Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pearce FJ, Cruz Rivera S, Liu X, Manna E, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ. The role of patient-reported outcome measures in trials of artificial intelligence health technologies: a systematic evaluation of ClinicalTrials.gov records (1997-2022). Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e160-e167. [PMID: 36828608 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00249-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
The extent to which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used in clinical trials for artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is unknown. In this systematic evaluation, we aim to establish how PROMs are being used to assess AI health technologies. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for interventional trials registered from inception to Sept 20, 2022, and included trials that tested an AI health technology. We excluded observational studies, patient registries, and expanded access reports. We extracted data regarding the form, function, and intended use population of the AI health technology, in addition to the PROMs used and whether PROMs were incorporated as an input or output in the AI model. The search identified 2958 trials, of which 627 were included in the analysis. 152 (24%) of the included trials used one or more PROM, visual analogue scale, patient-reported experience measure, or usability measure as a trial endpoint. The type of AI health technologies used by these trials included AI-enabled smart devices, clinical decision support systems, and chatbots. The number of clinical trials of AI health technologies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and the proportion of trials that used PROMs increased from registry inception to 2022. The most common clinical areas AI health technologies were designed for were digestive system health for non-PROM trials and musculoskeletal health (followed by mental and behavioural health) for PROM trials, with PROMs commonly used in clinical areas for which assessment of health-related quality of life and symptom burden is particularly important. Additionally, AI-enabled smart devices were the most common applications tested in trials that used at least one PROM. 24 trials tested AI models that captured PROM data as an input for the AI model. PROM use in clinical trials of AI health technologies falls behind PROM use in all clinical trials. Trial records having inadequate detail regarding the PROMs used or the type of AI health technology tested was a limitation of this systematic evaluation and might have contributed to inaccuracies in the data synthesised. Overall, the use of PROMs in the function and assessment of AI health technologies is not only possible, but is a powerful way of showing that, even in the most technologically advanced health-care systems, patients' perspectives remain central.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Data-Enabled Medical Technologies and Devices Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elaine Manna
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Data-Enabled Medical Technologies and Devices Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Data-Enabled Medical Technologies and Devices Hub, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Birmingham-Oxford Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang M, Zhu L, Lin SY, Herr K, Chi CL, Demir I, Dunn Lopez K, Chi NC. Using artificial intelligence to improve pain assessment and pain management: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:570-587. [PMID: 36458955 PMCID: PMC9933069 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Over 20% of US adults report they experience pain on most days or every day. Uncontrolled pain has led to increased healthcare utilization, hospitalization, emergency visits, and financial burden. Recognizing, assessing, understanding, and treating pain using artificial intelligence (AI) approaches may improve patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. A comprehensive synthesis of the current use and outcomes of AI-based interventions focused on pain assessment and management will guide the development of future research. OBJECTIVES This review aims to investigate the state of the research on AI-based interventions designed to improve pain assessment and management for adult patients. We also ascertain the actual outcomes of Al-based interventions for adult patients. METHODS The electronic databases searched include Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. The search initially identified 6946 studies. After screening, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. The Critical Appraisals Skills Programme was used to assess study quality. RESULTS This review provides evidence that machine learning, data mining, and natural language processing were used to improve efficient pain recognition and pain assessment, analyze self-reported pain data, predict pain, and help clinicians and patients to manage chronic pain more effectively. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this review suggest that using AI-based interventions has a positive effect on pain recognition, pain prediction, and pain self-management; however, most reports are only pilot studies. More pilot studies with physiological pain measures are required before these approaches are ready for large clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meina Zhang
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Linzee Zhu
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Shih-Yin Lin
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Keela Herr
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Chih-Lin Chi
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ibrahim Demir
- College of Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Nai-Ching Chi
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang A, Xiu X, Liu S, Qian Q, Wu S. Characteristics of Artificial Intelligence Clinical Trials in the Field of Healthcare: A Cross-Sectional Study on ClinicalTrials.gov. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13691. [PMID: 36294269 PMCID: PMC9602501 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has driven innovative transformation in healthcare service patterns, despite a lack of understanding of its performance in clinical practice. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of AI-related trials in healthcare based on ClinicalTrials.gov, intending to investigate the trial characteristics and AI's development status. Additionally, the Neo4j graph database and visualization technology were employed to construct an AI technology application graph, achieving a visual representation and analysis of research hotspots in healthcare AI. A total of 1725 eligible trials that were registered in ClinicalTrials.gov up to 31 March 2022 were included in this study. The number of trial registrations has dramatically grown each year since 2016. However, the AI-related trials had some design drawbacks and problems with poor-quality result reporting. The proportion of trials with prospective and randomized designs was insufficient, and most studies did not report results upon completion. Currently, most healthcare AI application studies are based on data-driven learning algorithms, covering various disease areas and healthcare scenarios. As few studies have publicly reported results on ClinicalTrials.gov, there is not enough evidence to support an assessment of AI's actual performance. The widespread implementation of AI technology in healthcare still faces many challenges and requires more high-quality prospective clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sizhu Wu
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-10-5232-8760
| |
Collapse
|