Effect of a Standard vs Enhanced Implementation Strategy to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing in Nursing Homes: A Trial Protocol of the Improving Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Institutions Through Facilitated Implementation (IMUNIFI) Study

Determining the Appropriateness of Initiating Antibiotic Therapy in Nursing Home Residents

One approach for improving antibiotic prescribing in nursing homes is evaluating appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy. However, determining appropriateness has been a challenge. To investigate this problem literature review identified studies evaluating appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy in nursing homes. Two criteria were used most often to assess appropriateness: infection surveillance criterion or criteria specifically designed to assist clinicians for prescribing antibiotics. Development of these criteria and results of studies using these criteria were reviewed. There was considerable variability in percentage appropriateness of initiating therapy for these criteria, variation in the methodology for conducting these studies, and limitations of the criteria. The main limitation of infection surveillance criteria is that they are specifically designed to be highly specific but this results in low sensitivity. Thus, surveillance criteria should not be used for assessing appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. The other criterion is limited because it uses only localizing signs and symptoms of infection and these findings may not be documented in the medical record when evaluating appropriateness retrospectively. Several alternative methods to assess appropriateness were identified but evaluation of these methods have not been published. Several changes are suggested to improve the evaluation of the appropriateness of initiating antibiotic therapy in nursing home residents: confirmation by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that surveillance definitions should not be used to evaluate appropriateness; develop and validate definitions of clinical infections in residents; standardize methods to evaluate appropriateness prospectively by the facility antimicrobial stewardship program; educate clinicians and nursing staff regarding the criteria for assessing appropriateness; and investigate the influence of provider-, resident-, family-, and facility-level factors on antibiotic use in nursing home residents.

The Trial to Reduce Antimicrobial Use in Nursing Home Residents With Alzheimer Disease and Other Dementias (TRAIN-AD): A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Antimicrobials are extensively prescribed to nursing home residents with advanced dementia, often without evidence of infection or consideration of the goals of care.

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to improve the management of suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) and lower respiratory infections (LRIs) for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cluster randomized clinical trial of 28 Boston-area nursing homes (14 per arm) and 426 residents with advanced dementia (intervention arm, 199 residents; control arm, 227 residents) was conducted from August 1, 2017, to April 30, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention content integrated best practices from infectious diseases and palliative care for management of suspected UTIs and LRIs in residents with advanced dementia. Components targeting nursing home practitioners (physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses) included an in-person seminar, an online course, management algorithms (posters, pocket cards), communication tips (pocket cards), and feedback reports on prescribing of antimicrobials. The residents' health care proxies received a booklet about infections in advanced dementia. Nursing homes in the control arm continued routine care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was antimicrobial treatment courses for suspected UTIs or LRIs per person-year. Outcomes were measured for as many as 12 months. Secondary outcomes were antimicrobial courses for suspected UTIs and LRIs when minimal criteria for treatment were absent per person-year and burdensome procedures used to manage these episodes (bladder catherization, chest radiography, venous blood sampling, or hospital transfer) per person-year.

RESULTS

The intervention arm had 199 residents (mean [SD] age, 87.7 [8.0] years; 163 [81.9%] women; 36 [18.1%] men), of which 163 (81.9%) were White and 27 (13.6%) were Black. The control arm had 227 residents (mean [SD] age, 85.3 [8.6] years; 190 [83.7%] women; 37 [16.3%] men), of which 200 (88.1%) were White and 22 (9.7%) were Black. There was a 33% (nonsignificant) reduction in antimicrobial treatment courses for suspected UTIs or LRIs per person-year in the intervention vs control arm (adjusted marginal rate difference, -0.27 [95% CI, -0.71 to 0.17]). This reduction was primarily attributable to reduced antimicrobial use for LRIs. The following secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between arms: antimicrobials initiated when minimal criteria were absent, bladder catheterizations, venous blood sampling, and hospital transfers. Chest radiography use was significantly lower in the intervention arm (adjusted marginal rate difference, -0.56 [95% CI, -1.10 to -0.03]). In-person or online training was completed by 88% of the targeted nursing home practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cluster randomized clinical trial found that despite high adherence to the training, a multicomponent intervention promoting goal-directed care for suspected UTIs and LRIs did not significantly reduce antimicrobial use among nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03244917.

Effectiveness of interventions targeting antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

There are high levels of inappropriate antibiotic use in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Our objective was to examine evidence of the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce antibiotic use and/or inappropriate use in LTCFs.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from 1997 until November 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Controlled and uncontrolled studies in LTCFs measuring intervention effects on rates of overall antibiotic use and/or appropriateness of use were included. Secondary outcomes were intervention implementation barriers from process evaluations.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently applied the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group's resources to classify interventions and assess risk of bias. Meta-analyses used random effects models to pool results.

RESULTS

Of include studies (n=19), 10 had a control group and 17 had a high risk of bias. All interventions had multiple components. Eight studies (with high risk of bias) showed positive impacts on outcomes and included one of the following interventions: audit and feedback, introduction of care pathways or an infectious disease team. Meta-analyses on change in the percentage of residents on antibiotics (pooled relative risk (RR) (three studies, 6862 residents): 0.85, 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.18), appropriateness of decision to treat with antibiotics (pooled RR (three studies, 993 antibiotic orders): 1.10, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.91) and appropriateness of antibiotic selection for respiratory tract infections (pooled RR (three studies, 292 orders): 1.15, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.40), showed no significant intervention effects. However, meta-analyses only included results from intervention groups since most studies lacked a control group. Insufficient data prevented meta-analysis on other outcomes. Process evaluations (n=7) noted poor intervention adoption, low physician engagement and high staff turnover as barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence that interventions employed to date are effective at improving antibiotic use in LTCFs. Future studies should use rigorous study designs and tailor intervention implementation to the setting.