Comparison of 24-Month Outcomes After Treatment for Distal Radius Fracture: The WRIST Randomized Clinical Trial

Reporting Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: The Presence of Spin in the Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spin is a form of reporting bias which suggests a treatment is beneficial despite a statistically nonsignificant difference in outcomes. Our purpose was to define the prevalence of spin within the abstracts of distal radius fracture (DRF) systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MA). We also sought to identify article characteristics that were more likely to contain spin.

METHODS

We performed a SR of multiple databases to identify DRF SRs and MAs. Articles were screened and analyzed by 3 reviewers. We recorded article and journal characteristics including adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, funding disclosures, methodologic quality (AMSTAR 2 instrument), impact factor, and country of origin. Presence of the 9 most severe types of spin in abstracts were recorded. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to analyze the association between article characteristics and the presence of spin.

RESULTS

A total of 112 articles were included. Spin was present in 46% of abstracts, with type 1 spin ("conclusions not supported by findings") most frequent (19%). Spin was present in 43% of abstracts in PRISMA-adhering journals compared to 49% in journals that did not (OR = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.37-1.68). For articles originating from China, spin was present in 61% of abstracts compared to 39% of abstracts from other countries (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.13-5.75).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to low article quality, there are high rates of spin within the abstracts of SRs and MAs related to treatment of DRF. Articles within journals that adhere to PRISMA do not appear to contain less spin.

A prospective randomized control trial comparing outcomes of casting, pinning, and plating for distal end of radius fractures (AO type A2, A3, C1, or C2) in the elderly population

PURPOSE

With this prospective randomized control trial (RCT), we aim to provide the outcome analyses of the three most used treatment modalities for distal end of radius (DER) fracture management in the elderly.

METHODS

A prospective randomized control trial was performed. Fifty-two patients with DER fractures (AO A2, A3, C1, or C2) were randomized to the casting (n = 17), percutaneous pinning (n = 18), and the volar plating group (n = 17). Radiological measurements measured were radial inclination (RI), radial height (RH), volar tilt (VT), and ulnar variance (UV). The outcome was measured based on range-of-motion, grip strength, Patient-Related-Wrist-Evaluation (PRWE) score, and the Quick-Disabilities-of-the-Arm-Shoulder-Hand (QDASH) score.

RESULTS

Immediate post-operative and 1-year-follow-up X-rays showed a significant difference measurement between the groups (p < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of the casting and pinning groups (p < 0.05) and the casting and plating groups (p < 0.05) revealed significant differences at the 1-year follow-up, but not the pinning and plating groups (p > 0.05). The analysis found significant differences in clinical outcomes after 1 month of follow-up, with the plating group outperforming the other two (p > 0.05). However, after a year of follow-up, all groups had comparable outcomes; however, the plating group showed improved palmar flexion (p < 0.001), radial deviation (p < 0.001), and a lower PRWE score (p < 0.05), indicating better wrist function. Complications were more in casting group.

CONCLUSION

The study found a radiologically significant difference between groups throughout the follow-up, but it did not affect functional results. Clinical outcomes were similar across the groups, with plating showing better palmar flexion and radial deviation. Grip strength was also better in the plating group, but statistically insignificant. The study suggests plating should be chosen over other treatments for high-demand patients.

Orthopaedic Research Consortiums: A Review of Scope, Sex and Racial Representation

Introduction The creation of research groups and consortiums has become more common in all medical and surgical specialities. The purpose of this investigation was to assess and describe collaborative research groups and consortiums within orthopaedic surgery. In addition, we aimed to define the demographics of the research consortium members with particular attention to female and minority members. Methods  Journals with a musculoskeletal/orthopaedic focus and a few medical journals were selected to identify articles published by research groups and consortiums. Articles published from 2020 to 2022 were manually reviewed. Bibliographic information, author information and level of evidence (LOE) were recorded. For identified consortium members, sex and race were defined in a binary manner. Results A total of 92 research consortiums were identified. A list of members was identified for 77 groups (83.7%), totalling 2,260 researchers. The remaining group members were not able to be identified due to the lack of information in the included publications, research group websites or after communicating with the corresponding author for respective articles. Most researchers were male (n=1,748, 77.3%) and white (n=1,694, 75%). Orthopaedic surgeons comprised 1,613 (71.4%) identified researchers. The most common fellowship training for orthopaedic surgeons was paediatrics (n=370, 16.4%), trauma (n=266, 11.8%) and sports medicine (n=229, 10.1%). The consortiums published 261 articles: women were lead (first) authors in 23% and senior (last) authors in 11.1%. Non-white researchers were lead authors in 24.5% (n=64) and senior authors in 17.2% (n=45). The most common level of evidence was level 3, accounting for 45.6% (n=119) of all publications. Level 1 evidence accounted for 12.6% (n=33) of published articles. Discussion Representation of women in orthopaedic research consortiums exceeds their representation in almost every orthopaedic professional society. There is less publicly available data to compare the involvement of under-represented minorities (URMs) in research consortiums to general practice. Further investigations should analyse possible avenues in which gender and racial disparity could be improved within orthopaedic surgery research.

Managing the Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

Distal radius fractures are common injuries. Satisfactory outcomes are typically achieved with appropriate nonoperative or operative treatment. A proportion of these injuries develop symptomatic malunions, which may be treated surgically with distal radius corrective osteotomy. A thorough understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, radiographic parameters, and indications is needed to provide appropriate treatment. Factors, including surgical approach, osteotomy type, use of bone graft, fixation construct, management of associated tendon and/or nerve conditions, soft tissue contracture releases, and need for ulnar-sided procedures, should be considered. A comprehensive evaluation is necessary to guide understanding for when salvage procedures may be preferred.

Complications of operatively treated distal radial fractures

Distal radial fractures represent the most common fractures of the upper extremity. Operative treatment is performed for approximately one-third of distal radial fractures in the adult population. Complications following operative treatment of distal radial fractures vary depending on the treatment modality and can be stratified into preoperative and postoperative complications. Complications can occur in the near, intermediate and long term. The most common complications seen are tendon irritation and rupture, chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), carpal tunnel syndrome, ulnar or radial neuropathy, compartment syndrome, malunion, inadequate fixation or loss of fixation, symptomatic hardware, post-traumatic arthritis, stiffness and infection. Careful planning, treatment and patient selection can help to mitigate these complications.Level of evidence: V.

Social Media Posts About Distal Radius Fracture: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Social media offers a popular, unfiltered source of patient and provider perspectives on health care. This study investigated the characteristics of social media posts referencing distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

Content was queried from Instagram from February 06, 2019, to December 08, 2021, using the hashtags "#distalradiusfracture" and "#wristfracture." The 1500 most-liked posts were analyzed. Poster demographics including age, gender, region, laterality, and treatment type and post characteristics including post type, number, content, timing relative to treatment, tone, and satisfaction were examined. Variables were compared using χ2 tests. Univariate, multivariate, and stepwise regression were performed.

RESULTS

The most popular post formats were single photo (44.5%), multiple photos (32.3%), and single video (13.9%). Patients (40.3%) were the most common poster followed by surgeons (33.4%). Men (48.7%) and women (51.3) were evenly represented. Of the total posts, 87.7% depicted the post-treatment phase of care; 54.8% of posts depicted operative management, while 26.6% depicted non-operative management; and 73.7% of posts were positive in tone, 18.7% neutral, and 7.6% negative. Univariate analysis demonstrated that posters who were patients, friends/family of patients, female, and posts with >100 "likes" were more likely to share negative tones. Multivariate and stepwise regression were consistent with the above.

CONCLUSION

Most posts regarding DRF originate from patients, are post-treatment, and are positive. Negative tone is associated with posts from patients, family/friends of patients, female posters, and posts with >100 likes. With this information, surgeons will be better prepared to address patient concerns, manage expectations, and actively participate in social media themselves.

The Moderating Effect of Age on Patient-Reported Benefits From Operative Management of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-Regression Analysis

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures in older adults (>65 years) remains uncertain despite numerous randomized trials. The purpose of this study was to examine the moderating effect of age on patient-reported benefits of volar locked plating versus cast immobilization for intra-articular distal radius fractures.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to compare volar locked plating and cast immobilization of intra-articular distal radius fractures. Meta-regression analyses were used to examine the moderating effect of age on improvements in patient-reported outcome measures from operative treatment of distal radius factures. Modeling results were then used to estimate improvements in Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores from surgery that are associated with ages ranging from 65 to 90 years.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials including 1,806 patients were included. Age was a significant moderator of patient-reported benefits after operative treatment, with decreasing DASH score benefits from surgery associated with older ages. Model predictions show that a majority of patients aged <70 years will experience a clinically meaningful improvement in DASH scores from surgery. Patients aged 70-80 years have decreasing DASH benefits with age, but many may still experience a clinically meaningful improvement from surgery. Patients aged >80 years are unlikely to experience a clinically meaningful improvement in DASH scores with surgical management.

CONCLUSIONS

Older ages are associated with decreased benefits from surgical management with volar locked plating as compared to cast immobilization. Patients aged >80 years are unlikely to experience a clinically significant improvement with surgery. Surgeons and policymakers may use these data to counsel patients, health systems, and professional organizations on the risks and benefits of operative treatment in older adults.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognosis 1, Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

An Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Minimal Clinically Important Difference Usage in Hand Surgery

Background

This study was designed to examine the current use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) calculations in the hand surgery literature in an effort to standardize their use for research purposes.

Methods

A systematic review of the hand surgery literature was conducted. All nonshoulder upper extremity articles utilizing PROMs were compared between different journals, different surgical indications, and differing usage. MCID values were reported, and calculation methods assessed.

Results

In total, 4677 articles were reviewed, and 410 met the inclusion criteria of containing at least one PROM. Of the 410 articles reporting PROMs, 148 also mentioned an associated MCID. Of the articles that mentioned MCIDs, 14 calculated MCID values based on their specific clinical populations, whereas the remainder referenced prior studies. An estimated 35 different PROMs were reported in the study period; 95 different MCID values were referenced from 65 unique articles.

Conclusions

There are many different PROMs currently being used in hand surgery clinical reports. The reported MCIDs from their related PROMs are from multiple different sources and calculated by different methods. The lack of standardization in the hand surgery literature makes interpretation of studies utilizing PROMs difficult. There is a need for a standardized method of calculating MCID values and applying these values to established PROMs for nonshoulder upper extremity conditions.

Current Management and Volar Locking Plate Fixation with Bone Cement Augmentation for Elderly Distal Radius Fractures-An Updated Narrative Review

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common among all kinds of fractures with an increase in incidence due to the rapidly expanded size of the elderly population in the past decades. Both non-surgical and surgical treatments can be applied for this common injury. Nowadays, more and more elderly patients with DRFs undergo surgical treatments to restore pre-injury activity levels faster. However, optimal treatment for geriatric DRFs is still debated, and careful evaluation and selection of patients are warranted considering clinical and functional outcomes, and complications following surgical treatments. Furthermore, osteoporosis is a predominant factor in elderly DRFs mostly deriving from a low-energy trauma, so many treatment modalities are developed to enhance better bone healing. Among various options for bone augmentation, bone cement is one of the most widely used measures. Bone cement such as calcium phosphate theoretically improves fracture stability and healing, but whether the elderly patients with DRFs can significantly benefit from surgical fixation with bone cement augmentation (BCA) remains controversial. Hence, in the present review, the latest literature regarding current concepts of management and evidence about volar locking plate fixation (VLPF) with BCA for elderly DRFs was searched in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science; out of >1000 articles, full texts of 48 and 6 articles were then examined and analyzed separately for management and VLPF with BCA for elderly DRFs. We aim to provide the readers with updates concerning the above issues.

Multi-investigator collaboration in orthopedic surgery research compared to other medical fields: Update comparing 2021-2009

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of multicenter studies in the orthopedic literature compared to general medicine and other surgical subspecialty studies as an update to a previous study. The number of multicenter research studies across three orthopedic surgery journals was higher in 2021 compared to 2009 (7.2% [95% CI: 5.1%-9.4%, χ2  [df = 1 = 43.8]], p < 0.0001), as was the number of authors and institutions listed on clinical research studies. While these trends in multicenter research publishing are encouraging, orthopedic surgery still lags behind the general medicine and other surgical subspecialty literature bases. Of the 934 orthopedic surgery studies published, 92 (9.9%) were multicenter studies compared to 64.4% of the general medicine and 26.9% of the other surgical subspecialty studies (χ2  [df = 2] = 472.6, p < 0.001). Multicenter trials conducted in orthopedics have fundamentally changed musculoskeletal care, affecting the lives of millions of patients. Participation in multicenter research should be encouraged and prioritized through continued advocacy, funding, support, and direction from orthopedic governing bodies, journals, and subspecialty groups.

Trends in Distal Radius Fixation Reimbursement, Charge, and Utilization in the Medicare Population

Background  Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the second most common fragility fracture experienced by the elderly, and surgical management constitutes an appreciable sum of Medicare expenditure for upper extremity surgery. Using Medicare data from 2012 to 2017, our primary aim was to describe temporal changes in surgical treatment, physician payment, and patient charges for DRF fixation. Methods  We examined surgical volumes and retrospective patient charge (services billed by surgeon) and surgeon payment (professional fee) data from 2012 to 2017 for four DRF surgeries: closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of extra-articular fractures, ORIF of intra-articular (IA) (2-fragment) fractures, and ORIF of IA (> 3 fragments) fractures. The reimbursement ratio was defined and calculated as the ratio of charges to payment. Rates were adjusted for inflation using the annual consumer-price index. Results  For these four surgeries from 2012 to 2017, total patient charges grew by 64% from $117 to 193 million, while surgeon payment grew by 42% from $30 to 42 million. CRPP cases fell by 47%, while ORIF increased by 17, 14, and 45% for extra-articular, IA (2-fragment), and IA (> 3 fragments) surgeries, respectively. After adjusting for inflation, payment to physicians increased by more than or equal to 16% for all procedures except for CRPP, which fell by 2%. Charges during this same period increased from 13 to 38%. Reimbursement ratios declined from -9.2% to -13% for each procedure. Conclusion  From 2012 to 2017, while charges have outpaced surgeon payment, payment has outpaced inflation for all forms of distal radius ORIF, aside from CRPP. There has been a continued sharp decline of CRPP. Level of Evidence is III, economic.

Recognizing and Treating Unique Distal Radius Fracture Patterns that are Prone to Displacement

An unstable distal radius fracture is one that is not capable of resisting displacement after initial closed reduction. The challenge in managing distal radius fractures is identifying which fractures are prone to displacement. Currently, there are no standard criteria for assessing the stability of distal radius fractures. The fracture pattern and patient characteristics should be taken into consideration when treating distal radius fractures. This article discusses how to recognize and manage distal radius fractures that are prone to displacement.

Total Wrist Arthroplasty as a Motion-Sparing Option for Distal Radius Malunion in a Patient of Advanced Age: A Case Report

CASE

A 62-year-old woman presented with wrist pain secondary to a distal radius fracture malunion 4 months after a fall onto an outstretched hand. She was not an ideal candidate for osteotomy and bone graft because of the degree of displacement and osteoporosis, so after nonoperative treatment was unsuccessful, she was offered total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) or arthrodesis and opted for TWA.

CONCLUSION

At 14-month follow-up, the patient reported significant improvement in her pain and function. The current generation of TWA implants may allow use in the management of symptomatic distal radius malunions in older, low-demand patients.

Functional outcomes and complications after treatment of distal radius fracture in patients sixty years and over: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIM

This network meta-analysis aims to compare functional outcomes and complications between conservative treatment and surgery for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and over.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of conservative treatment and surgery for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and over. Primary outcomes included grip strength and overall complications. Secondary outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores, wrist range of motion and forearm rotation, and radiographic assessment. All continuous outcomes were assessed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and binary outcomes were assessed using odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine a hierarchy of treatments. Cluster analysis was performed for grouping treatments based on the SUCRA values of primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs were included to compare conservative treatment, volar lockedplate (VLP), K-wires fixation, and external-fixation. VLP outperformed conservative treatment for 1-year and minimum 2-year grip strength (SMD; 0.28 [0.07 to 0.48] and 0.27 [0.02 to 0.53], respectively). VLP yielded the optimal grip strength at 1-year and minimum 2-year follow-up (SUCRA; 89.8% and 86.7%, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients aged 60 to 80 years old, VLP outperformed conservative treatment in DASH and PRWE scores (SMD, 0.33 [0.10, 0.56] and 0.23 [0.01, 0.45], respectively). In addition, VLP had the fewest complications (SUCRA = 84.3%). Cluster analysis suggested that VLP and K-wire fixation were more effective treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Evidence to date demonstrates that VLP provides measurable benefits in grip strength and fewer complications to those 60 years of age and over, and that benefit is not reflected in current practice guidelines. There is a subgroup of patients where K-wire fixation outcomes are similar to those of VLP; defining this subgroup may yield substantial societal benefits.

Colles' Fracture: An Epidemiological Nationwide Study in Italy from 2001 to 2016

The present study aimed to evaluate the yearly number of Colles' fractures in Italy from 2001 to 2016, based on official information found in hospitalization records. A secondary aim was to estimate the average length of hospitalization for patients with a Colles' fracture. A tertiary aim was to investigate the distribution of the procedures generally performed for Colles' fractures' treatment in Italy. An analysis of the National Hospital Discharge records (SDO) maintained at the Italian Ministry of Health, concerning the 15 years of our study (from 2001 to 2016) was performed. Data are anonymous and include the patient's age, sex, domicile, length of hospital stays (days), primary diagnoses and primary procedures. From 2001 to 2016, 120,932 procedures for Colles' fracture were performed in Italy, which represented an incidence of 14.8 procedures for every 100,000 adult Italian inhabitants. The main number of surgeries was found in the 65-69- and 70-74-year age groups. In the present study, we review the epidemiology of Colles' fractures in the Italian population, the burden of the disease on the national health care system (in terms of length of hospitalization) and the distribution of the main surgical procedures performed for the treatment of the disease.

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Treatment Modalities for Patients Older Than 60 Years with Distal Radius Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and complications of different treatment modalities for elderly patients with distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Eight databases were searched. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies were RCTs that compared different treatment modalities (surgical or nonoperative) in patients older than 60 years with displaced or unstable intra-articular and/or extra-articular DRFs.

RESULTS

Twenty-three RCTs met the eligibility criteria (2020 patients). For indirect comparisons, the main findings of the NMA were in volar locking plate (VLP) versus cast immobilization, with the mean differences for the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at -4.45 points (p < 0.05) and grip strength at 6.11% (p < 0.05). Additionally, VLP showed a lower risk ratio (RR) of minor complications than dorsal plate fixation (RR: 0.02) and bridging external fixation (RR: 0.25). Conversely, VLP and dorsal plate fixation showed higher rates of major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other treatment modalities, VLP showed statistically significant differences for some functional outcomes; however, most differences were not clinically relevant. For complications, although most differences were not statistically significant, VLP was the treatment modality that reported the lowest rate of minor and overall complications but also showed one of the highest rates of major complications in these patients. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022315562.

Controversies in the Management of Bicolumnar Fractures of the Distal Humerus

Bicolumnar fractures of the distal humerus pose numerous treatment challenges for upper-extremity surgeons. Although open reduction and internal fixation demonstrates advantages compared with nonsurgical treatment, restoration of osseous anatomy can be difficult, particularly for comminuted, intra-articular fractures. Despite well-recognized complications, total elbow arthroplasty remains an option for elderly patients with fractures not amenable to fixation. Although indications remain controversial, distal humerus hemiarthroplasty has emerged as a potential alternative to total elbow arthroplasty in carefully selected patients with nonreconstructable fractures. Numerous controversies remain with respect to the management decisions for these complex injuries, including the optimal surgical approach, management of the ulnar nerve, and ideal fixation constructs for open reduction internal fixation. Our purpose is to review the management of bicolumnar distal humerus fractures in adult patients and discuss current controversies related to treatment.

Plating vs Closed Reduction for Fractures in the Distal Radius in Older Patients: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Distal radius fractures are common and are managed with or without surgery. Current evidence indicates surgical treatment is not superior to nonsurgical treatment at 12 months.

Objective

Does surgical treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 60 years or older provide better patient-reported wrist pain and function outcomes than nonsurgical treatment at 24 months?

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this secondary analysis of a combined multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) and a parallel observational study, 300 patients were screened from 19 centers in Australia and New Zealand. Of these, 166 participants were randomized to surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Participants who declined randomization (n = 134) were included in the parallel observational group with the same treatment options and follow-up. Participants were followed up at 3, 12, and 24 months by a blinded assessor. The 24-month outcomes are reported herein. Data were collected from December 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020, and analyzed from February 4 to October 21, 2021.

Interventions

Surgical treatment consisting of open reduction and internal fixation using a volar-locking plate (VLP group) and nonsurgical treatment consisting of closed reduction and cast immobilization (CR group).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was patient-reported function using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, wrist pain, patient-reported treatment success, patient-rated bother with appearance, and posttreatment complications.

Results

Among the 166 randomized and 134 observational participants (300 participants; mean [SD] age, 71.2 [7.5] years; 269 women [89.7%]), 151 (91.0%) randomized and 118 (88.1%) observational participants were followed up at 24 months. In the RCT, no clinically important difference occurred in mean PRWE scores at 24 months (13.6 [95% CI, 9.1-18.1] points for VLP fixation vs 15.8 [95% CI, 11.3-20.2] points for CR; mean difference, 2.1 [95% CI, -4.2 to 8.5]; P = .50). There were no between-group differences in all other outcomes except for patient-reported treatment success, which favored VLP fixation (33 of 74 [44.6%] in the CR group vs 54 of 72 [75.0%] in the VLP fixation group reported very successful treatment; P = .002). Rates of posttreatment complications were generally low and similar between treatment groups, including deep infection (1 of 76 [1.3%] in the CR group vs 0 of 75 in the VLP fixation group) and complex regional pain syndrome (2 of 76 [2.6%] in the CR group vs 1 of 75 [1.3%] in the VLP fixation group). The 24-month trial outcomes were consistent with 12-month outcomes and with outcomes from the observational group.

Conclusions and Relevance

Consistent with previous reports, these findings suggest that VLP fixation may not be superior to CR for displaced distal radius fractures for patient-rated wrist function in persons 60 years or older during a 2-year period. Significantly higher patient-reported treatment success at 2 years in the VLP group may be attributable to other treatment outcomes not captured in this study.

Trial Registration

ANZCTR.org Identifier: ACTRN12616000969460.