Associations of Medicaid Expansion With Insurance Coverage, Stage at Diagnosis, and Treatment Among Patients With Genitourinary Malignant Neoplasms

Medicaid expansion and racial disparity in timely multidisciplinary treatment in muscle invasive bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary cancer care (neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy) is crucial for outcome of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), a potentially curable illness. Medicaid expansion through Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased insurance coverage especially among patients of racial minorities. This study aims to investigate the association between Medicaid expansion and racial disparity in timely treatment in MIBC.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study analyzed Black and White individuals aged 18-64 years with stage II and III bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy from National Cancer Database 2008-2018. Primary outcome was timely treatment started within 45 days following cancer diagnosis. Racial disparity is the percentage-point difference between Black and White patients. Patients in expansion and nonexpansion states were compared using difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences analyses, controlling for age, sex, area-level income, clinical stage, comorbidity, metropolitan status, treatment type, and year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

The study included 4991 (92.3% White, n = 4605; 7.7% Black, n = 386) patients. Percentage of Black patients who received timely care increased following the ACA in Medicaid expansion states (54.5% pre-ACA vs 57.4% post-ACA) but decreased in nonexpansion states (69.9% pre-ACA vs 53.7% post-ACA). After adjusting covariates, Medicaid expansion was associated with a net 13.7 percentage-point reduction of Black-White patient disparity in timely receipt of MIBC treatment (95% confidence interval = 0.5% to 26.8%; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion was associated with statically significant reduction in racial disparity between Black and White patients in timely multidisciplinary treatment for MIBC.

Medicaid Expansion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Participation of Patients With Medicaid in Cancer Clinical Trials

Importance

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion resulted in increased use of Medicaid insurance nationwide. However, the association between Medicaid expansion and access to clinical trials has not been examined to date.

Objective

To examine whether the implementation of ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with increased participation of patients with Medicaid insurance in cancer clinical trials.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Data for this cohort study of 51 751 patients were from the SWOG Cancer Research Network. All patients aged 18 to 64 years and enrolled in treatment trials with Medicaid or private insurance between April 1, 1992, and February 29, 2020, were included. Interrupted time-series analysis with segmented logistic regression was used. The monthly unemployment rate and presidential administration were adjusted to reflect potential differences in Medicaid use associated with economic conditions and national administrative policies, respectively. Data analysis was conducted between June 22, 2021, and August 5, 2022.

Exposure

Implementation of Medicaid expansion on January 1, 2014, was the independent exposure variable.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The number and proportion of patients by insurance type enrolled in cancer clinical trials over time were analyzed.

Results

Overall, data for 51 751 patients were analyzed. Mean (SD) age was 50.6 (9.8) years, 67.3% of patients were female, 41.1% were younger than 50 years, and 9.1% used Medicaid. A 19% annual increase (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.28; P < .001) was identified in the odds of patients using Medicaid after the ACA Medicaid expansion, resulting in a 52% increase (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.29-1.78; P < .001) compared with what was expected in the number of Medicaid patients enrolled over time. The association was greater in states that adopted Medicaid expansion in 2014 to 2015 (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38; P < .001) compared with other states (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.96-1.21; P = .20; P = .04 for interaction). By February 2020, the proportion of patients with Medicaid insurance was 17.8% (95% CI, 15.0%-20.8%; P < .001), whereas the expected proportion had ACA Medicaid expansion not occurred was 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.3%; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings suggest that implementation of ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with increased participation of patients using Medicaid in cancer clinical trials. Improved participation in clinical trials for Medicaid-insured patients is critical for socioeconomically vulnerable patients seeking access to the newest treatments available in trials and for improving confidence that trial findings apply to patients of all backgrounds.

Survival differences between the USA and an urban population from China for all cancer types and 20 individual cancers: a population-based study

Background

The systematic comparison of cancer survival between China and the USA is rare. Here we aimed to assess the magnitude of survival disparities and disentangle the impact of the stage at diagnosis between a Chinese metropolitan city and the USA on cancer survival.

Methods

We included 11,046 newly diagnosed cancer patients in Dalian Cancer Registry, China, 2015, with the follow-up data for vital status until December 2020. We estimated age-standardised 5-year relative survival and quantified the excess hazard ratio (EHR) of death using generalised linear models for all cancers and 20 individual cancers. We compared these estimates with 17 cancer registries' data from the USA, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We further estimated the stage-specific survival for five major cancers by region.

Findings

Age-standardised 5-year relative survival for all patients in Dalian was lower than that in the USA (49.9% vs 67.9%). By cancer types, twelve cancers with poorer prognosis were observed in Dalian compared to the USA, with the largest gap seen in prostate cancer (Dalian: 55.8% vs USA: 96.0%). However, Dalian had a better survival for lung cancer, cervical cancer, and bladder cancer. Dalian patients had a lower percentage of stage Ⅰ colorectal cancer (Dalian: 17.9% vs USA: 24.2%) and female breast cancer (Dalian: 40.9% vs USA: 48.9%). However, we observed better stage-specific survival among stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ lung cancer patients in Dalian than in the USA.

Interpretation

This study suggests that although the overall prognosis for patients was better in the USA than in Dalian, China, survival deficits existed in both countries. Improvement in cancer early detection and cancer care are needed in both countries.

Funding

National Key R&D Program (2021YFC2501900, 2022YFC3600805), Major State Basic Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-1-010, 2021-I2M-1-046), and Talent Incentive Program of Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Patients with Cancer in the United States: A Review

Since 2014, American states have had the option to expand their Medicaid programs as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law by former President Barack H. Obama in 2010. Emerging research has found that Medicaid expansion has had a significant impact on patients with cancer, who often face significant financial barriers to receiving the care they need. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive examination of the research conducted thus far on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer. We begin with a discussion of the history of Medicaid expansion and the key features of the ACA that facilitated it. We then review the literature, analyzing studies that have investigated the impact of Medicaid expansion on cancer patients in terms of access to care, quality of care, and health outcomes. Our findings suggest that Medicaid expansion has had a positive impact on patients with cancer in a number of ways. Patients in expansion states are more likely to receive timely cancer screening and diagnoses, and are more likely to receive appropriate cancer-directed treatment. Additionally, Medicaid expansion has been associated with improvements in cancer-related health outcomes, including improved survival rates. However, limitations and gaps in the current research on the impact of Medicaid expansion on patients with cancer exist, including a lack of long-term data on health outcomes. Additionally, further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms through which Medicaid expansion impacts cancer care.

Impact of Comprehensive Health Insurance on Quality of Life in Low-Income Hispanic Men with Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the transition from IMPACT, a disease-focused treatment program, to comprehensive health insurance under Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on general and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) on a cohort of previously uninsured low-income men. We hypothesize that general QoL would improve and prostate cancer-specific QoL would remain the same after the transition to comprehensive health insurance.

METHODS

We assessed and compared general QoL using the RAND SF-12v2™ (12-Item Short Form Survey, version 2) and prostate cancer-specific QoL using the UCLA PCI (Prostate Cancer Index) one year before, at, and one year after the transition between 30 men who transitioned to comprehensive insurance (newly insured/Medicaid group) and 54 men who remained in the prostate cancer program (uninsured/IMPACT group). We assessed the independent effects of Medicaid coverage on QoL outcomes using repeated-measures regression.

RESULTS

Our cohort was composed primarily of Hispanic men (82%). At transition, patient demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. General and prostate cancer-specific QoL did not differ between the groups and remained stable over time, Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment and shorter time since treatment were associated with worse urinary and sexual function across both groups and over all three time points.

CONCLUSION

Those who transitioned to full-scope insurance and those who remained in the free prostate cancer-focused treatment program had stable general and prostate cancer-specific QoL. High-touch navigation aspects of a disease-focused program may have contributed to stability in outcomes.

Role of Race and Insurance Status in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis-to-Treatment Interval

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies have shown that both race and insurance status may affect prostate cancer (PCa) workup and treatment. Preliminary investigations have shown that these factors may be associated with treatment delays, which may indicate inequitable care and increase risk of tumor progression. This investigation aimed to assess whether race and insurance impacted the interval between multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-to-biopsy, and biopsy-to-prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution analysis of 261 patients with recorded race and insurance data was performed using an Institutional Review Board-compliant database with information spanning from 2016 to 2022. Race was self-reported during intake, and insurance status was retrieved from the electronic medical record. Insurance was sub-divided into private, Medicare, and Medicaid. Diagnostic or treatment latency was defined as time between mpMRI-to-biopsy, or biopsy-to-surgery.

RESULTS

Stratified by race, there was no difference in either latency period when comparing African American (AA) and white patients. Stratified by insurance status, there was no difference in time from mpMRI-to-biopsy (P = .50), but there was a significantly longer interval from biopsy-to-prostatectomy for patients with Medicaid insurance (P = .02). Patients with Medicaid waited on average 168 days to receive surgery, in contrast to 92 days for private and 87 for Medicare. Notably, 82% of Medicaid patients were AA.

CONCLUSION

Insurance status, which is inherently linked to race and social determinants of health, portended a significantly increased interval between biopsy and surgery. Physicians should be aware of the relationship between insurance status and treatment delay, as well as its potential downstream consequences.

Changes in survival over time for primary brain and other CNS tumors in the United States, 2004-2017

Purpose

Despite advances in cancer diagnosis and clinical care, survival for many primary brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors remain poor. This study performs a comprehensive survival analysis on these tumors.

Methods

Survival differences were determined utilizing the National Program of Cancer Registries Survival Analytic file for primary brain and CNS tumors. Overall survival and survival of the 5 most common histopathologies, within specific age groups, were determined. Overall survival was compared for three time periods: 2004–2007, 2008–2012, and 2013–2017. Survival differences were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Models were adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, and treatment. Malignant and non-malignant brain tumors were assessed separately.

Results

Among malignant brain and CNS tumor patients overall, there were notable differences in survival by time period among all age groups. Similar differences were noted in non-malignant brain and CNS tumor patients, except for adults (aged 40–64 years), where no survival changes were observed. Survival differences varied within specific histopathologies across age groups. There were improvements in survival in 2008–2012 and 2013–2017, when compared to 2004–2007, in children, AYA, and older adults with malignant tumors, and among older adults with non-malignant tumors.

Conclusion

Overall survival for malignant brain and other CNS tumors improved slightly in 2013–2017 for all age groups as compared to 2004–2007. Significant changes were observed for non-malignant brain and other CNS tumors among older adults. Information regarding survival over time can be utilized to identify population level effects of diagnostic and treatment improvements.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04138-w.

Early prostate-specific antigen response among Black and non-Black patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with apalutamide

Aim: To assess reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels among Black and non-Black patients treated with apalutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) or metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Patients & methods: Patients were identified from electronic medical data. PSA reduction (≥50%, ≥90% or below 0.2 ng/ml) after apalutamide initiation was assessed. Results: A total of 313 patients with nmCRPC and 260 patients with mCSPC were identified. The majority of patients treated with apalutamide achieved a 90% reduction in PSA regardless of indication or race. The proportion of patients achieving a PSA reduction at any level was similar among Black and non-Black patients and was consistent with apalutamide phase III trials. Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, apalutamide consistently produced reduction in PSA levels in Black and non-Black men with nmCRPC or mCSPC.

Access to Urological Care for Medicaid-Insured Patients at Urology Practices Acquired by Private Equity Firms

OBJECTIVE

To characterize appointment access for Medicaid-insured patients seeking care at urology practices affiliated with private equity firms in light of the recent national trends in practice consolidation.

METHODS

We identified 214 urology offices affiliated with private equity firms that were geographically matched with 231 non-private equity affiliated urology offices. Using a standardized script, researchers posed as an adult patient with either Medicaid or commercial insurance in the clinical setting of new onset, painless hematuria. The primary outcome was whether the patient's insurance was accepted for an appointment. The secondary outcome was appointment wait time.

RESULTS

We conducted 815 appointment inquiry calls to 214 PE and 231 non-PE-affiliated urology offices across 12 states. Appointment availability was higher for commercially-insured patients (99.0%; 95% CI: 98.1%-99.9%) versus Medicaid-insured patients (59.8%; 95% CI: 55.0%-64.6%) (p<0.0001). Medicaid acceptance was higher at non-PE affiliated (66.8%; CI 60.4%-73.2%) than PE-affiliated practices (52.1%; 95% CI 45.0%-59.2%) (p=0.003). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, state Medicaid expansion status (OR 2.20; CI 1.14-4.28; p=0.020) was independently associated with Medicaid appointment availability, whereas PE-affiliation (OR 0.55; CI 0.37-0.83; p=0.004) was independently associated with lower Medicaid access. Appointment wait times did not differ significantly for commercially-insured versus Medicaid patients (19.2 vs 20.1 days; p=0.59), but PE-affiliated practices offered shorter mean wait times than non-PE offices (17.5 vs 21.4 days; p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Access disparities for urologic evaluation in patients with Medicaid insurance at urology practices and were more pronounced at private equity acquired practices.