Association of Noncontrast Computed Tomography and Perfusion Modalities With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Late-Window Stroke Thrombectomy

Impact of stroke imaging selection modality on endovascular thrombectomy outcomes in the early and extended time windows: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of imaging selection modality on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) remains unclear. This study aims to compare post-EVT outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO who underwent basic imaging (computed tomography with or without computed tomography angiography) and advanced imaging (computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging) in early and late time windows.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception until June 10, 2023. Studies investigating the relationship between the imaging selection modality and post-EVT outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO were retrieved. A random-effects model was used to pool the effect estimates of successful reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), functional independence, and mortality. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software v.4.3, and the outcomes were assessed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULT

A total of 13 non-randomized observational studies, comprising 19,694 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. In the early time windows, AIS-LVO patients receiving advanced imaging demonstrated a higher likelihood of functional independence (OR, 1.25, 95% CI, 1.08-1.46) and a lower risk of mortality (OR,.73 95% CI,.61-.86) compared to those receiving basic imaging. In the extended time windows, AIS-LVO patients undergoing advanced imaging had a lower mortality rate (OR,.79, 95% CI,.68-.92). Regardless of the time of onset, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sICH or successful reperfusion.

CONCLUSION

Advanced imaging combined with EVT may achieve better clinical outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO. Further high-quality studies are needed to validate these findings.

Brain imaging prior to thrombectomy in the late window of large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Optimal imaging modalities to select patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO) are not known. We conducted a systematic review comparing outcomes of patients selected by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)/CT angiography (CTA) vs. those selected by CT perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for EVT in these patients.

METHODS

We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2000, to July 15, 2023, to identify studies comparing outcomes of patients selected for EVT by NCCT/CTA vs. CTP or MRI in the late time window for AIS-LVO. Primary outcome was independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days or discharge. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. We pooled data across studies based on an inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Six cohort studies with 4208 patients were included. Pooled results showed no significant difference in the rate of independence at 90 days or discharge (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.03) and sICH (RR 1.26, 0.85-1.86) between patients selected by NCCT/CTA vs. CTP or MRI for EVT in the late window of AIS-LVO. However, patients selected by NCCT/CTA vs. CTP or MRI for EVT were associated with a higher risk of mortality (RR 1.21, 1.06-1.39).

CONCLUSION

For AIS-LVO in the late window, patients selected by NCCT/CTA compared with those selected by CTP or MRI for EVT might have a comparable rate of functional independence and sICH. Baseline NCCT/CTA may triage AIS-LVO in the late window.

Perfusion vs non-perfusion computed tomography imaging in the late window of emergent large vessel ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend the treatment of emergent large vessel ischemic stroke (ELVIS) patients presenting beyond 6 hours of last known well time with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) based on perfusion computed tomography (CT) neuroimaging. We compared the outcomes (long-term good clinical outcomes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality) of ELVIS patients according to the type of CT neuroimaging they underwent.

METHODS

We searched the following databases: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus from January 1, 2015, to June 14, 2023. We included studies of late-presenting ELVIS patients undergoing EVT that had with data for non-perfusion and perfusion CT neuroimaging. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Data were pooled using a random effects model.

RESULTS

We found 7 observational cohorts. Non-perfusion versus perfusion CT was not statistically significantly different for both long-term clinical (n = 3,224; RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.06; I2 = 18%) and sICH (n = 3,724; RR: 1.08 95% CI 0.60 to 1.94; I2 = 76%). Perfusion CT had less mortality (n = 3874; RR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.40; I2 = 0%). The certainty of these findings is very low because of limitations in the risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision domains of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

CONCLUSION

The use of either non-perfusion or perfusion CT neuroimaging may have little to no effect on long-term clinical outcomes and sICH for late-presenting EVT patients. Perfusion CT neuroimaging may be associated with a reduced the risk of mortality. Evidence uncertainty warrants randomized trial data.

Multiphase CT angiography perfusion maps for predicting target mismatch and ischemic lesion volumes

The complexity of CT perfusion (CTP) acquisition protocols may limit the availability of target mismatch assessment at resource-limited hospitals. We compared CTP mismatch with a mismatch surrogate generated from a simplified dynamic imaging sequence comprising widely available non-contrast CT (NCCT) and multiphase CT angiography (mCTA). Consecutive patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke who received NCCT, mCTA, and CTP were retrospectively included in this study. An mCTA-perfusion (mCTA-P) dynamic series was formed by co-registering NCCT and mCTA. We simulated an ideal mCTA-P study by down-sampling CTP (dCTP) dynamic images according to mCTA timing. Ischemic core and penumbra volumes were estimated by cerebral blood flow and Tmax thresholding, respectively, on perfusion maps calculated independently for CTP, dCTP, and mCTA-P by deconvolution. Concordance in target mismatch (core < 70 ml, penumbra ≥ 15 ml, mismatch ratio ≥ 1.8) determination by dCTP and mCTA-P versus CTP was assessed. Of sixty-one included patients, forty-six had a CTP target mismatch. Concordance with CTP profiles was 90% and 82% for dCTP and mCTA-P, respectively. Lower mCTA-P concordance was likely from differences in collimation width between NCCT and mCTA, which worsened perfusion map quality due to a CT number shift at mCTA. Moderate diagnostic agreement between CTP and mCTA-P was found and may improve with optimal mCTA scan parameter selection as simulated by dCTP. mCTA-P may be a pragmatic alternative where CTP is unavailable or the risks of additional radiation dose, contrast injections, and treatment delays outweigh the potential benefit of a separate CTP scan.

Automated advanced imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Certainties and uncertainties

The purpose of this is study was to review pearls and pitfalls of advanced imaging, such as computed tomography perfusion and diffusion-weighed imaging and perfusion-weighted imaging in the selection of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients suitable for endovascular treatment (EVT) in the late time window (6-24 h from symptom onset). Advanced imaging can quantify infarct core and ischemic penumbra using specific threshold values and provides optimal selection parameters, collectively called target mismatch. More precisely, target mismatch criteria consist of core volume and/or penumbra volume and mismatch ratio (the ratio between total hypoperfusion and core volumes) with precise cut-off values. The parameters of target mismatch are automatically calculated with dedicated software packages that allow a quick and standardized interpretation of advanced imaging. However, this approach has several limitations leading to a misclassification of core and penumbra volumes. In fact, automatic software platforms are affected by technical artifacts and are not interchangeable due to a remarkable vendor-dependent variability, resulting in different estimate of target mismatch parameters. In addition, advanced imaging is not completely accurate in detecting infarct core, that can be under- or overestimated. Finally, the selection of candidates for EVT remains currently suboptimal due to the high rates of futile reperfusion and overselection caused by the use of very stringent inclusion criteria. For these reasons, some investigators recently proposed to replace advanced with conventional imaging in the selection for EVT, after the demonstration that non-contrast CT ASPECTS and computed tomography angiography collateral evaluation are not inferior to advanced images in predicting outcome in AIS patients treated with EVT. However, other authors confirmed that CTP and PWI/DWI postprocessed images are superior to conventional imaging in establishing the eligibility of patients for EVT. Therefore, the routine application of automatic assessment of advanced imaging remains a matter of debate. Recent findings suggest that the combination of conventional and advanced imaging might improving our selection criteria.

Minimal Imaging Requirements

The minimal requirements for imaging studies prior to endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke are those that can provide the information necessary to determine the indication for treatment (treatment triage) and procedural strategies without being time-consuming. An important notion is to determine whether the patient can benefit from EVT. We should recognize that the perfect diagnostic imaging technique does not yet exist, and each has advantages and disadvantages. Generally, stroke imaging protocols to triage for EVT include the following three options: 1) non-contrast CT and CTA, 2) CT perfusion and CTA, and 3) MRI and MRA. It is not known if perfusion imaging or MRI is mandatory for patients with stroke presenting within 6 hours of onset, although non-contrast CT alone has less power to obtain the necessary information. Dual-energy CT can distinguish between post-EVT hemorrhage and contrast agent leakage immediately after EVT.

CT Perfusion vs Noncontrast CT for Late Window Stroke Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window (6-24 hours) can be evaluated with CT perfusion (CTP) or with noncontrast CT (NCCT) only. Whether outcomes differ depending on the type of imaging selection is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between CTP and NCCT for EVT selection in the late therapeutic window.

METHODS

This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines. A systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Studies focusing on late-window AIS undergoing EVT imaged through CTP and NCCT were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome of interest was rate of functional independence, defined as modified Rankin scale 0-2. The secondary outcomes of interest included rates of successful reperfusion, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

Five studies with 3,384 patients were included in our analysis. There were comparable rates of functional independence (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% CI 0.87-1.22; p = 0.71) and sICH (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.58-2.04; p = 0.80) between the 2 groups. Patients imaged with CTP had higher rates of successful reperfusion (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.64; p = 0.015) and lower rates of mortality (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; p = 0.017).

DISCUSSION

Although recovery of functional independence after late-window EVT was not more common in patients selected by CTP when compared with patients selected by NCCT only, patients selected by CTP had lower mortality.