Association of Brain Metastases With Survival in Patients With Limited or Stable Extracranial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Predictive role of intracranial PD-L1 expression in a real-world cohort of NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibition following brain metastasis resection

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that treatment of NSCLC brain metastases with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is associated with response rates similar to those of extracranial disease. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) serves as a predictive biomarker for ICI response. However, the predictive value of brain metastasis-specific (intracranial) PD-L1 TPS is not established. We investigated the role of intra- and extracranial PD-L1 TPS in NSCLC patients treated with ICI following brain metastasis resection.

METHODS

Clinical data from NSCLC patients treated with ICI following brain metastasis resection (n = 64) were analyzed. PD-L1 TPS of brain metastases (n = 64) and available matched extracranial tumor tissue (n = 44) were assessed via immunohistochemistry. Statistical analyses included cut point estimation via maximally selected rank statistics, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and multivariable Cox regression analysis for intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS), extracranial progression-free survival (ecPFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was found in 54.7% of brain metastases and 68.2% of extracranial tumor tissues, with a median intra- and extracranial PD-L1 TPS of 7.5% (0 - 50%, IQR) and 15.0% (0 - 80%, IQR), respectively. In matched tissue samples, extracranial PD-L1 TPS was significantly higher than intracranial PD-L1 TPS (p = 0.013). Optimal cut points for intracranial and extracranial PD-L1 TPS varied according to outcome parameter assessed. Notably, patients with a high intracranial PD-L1 TPS (> 40%) exhibited significantly longer icPFS as compared to patients with a low intracranial PD-L1 TPS (≤ 40%). The cut point of 40% for intracranial PD-L1 TPS was independently associated with OS, icPFS and ecPFS in multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the potential role of intracranial PD-L1 TPS in NSCLC, which could be used to predict ICI response in cases where extracranial tissue is not available for PD-L1 assessment as well as to specifically predict intracranial response.

Brain Metastases in the Setting of Stable Versus Progressing Extracranial Disease Among Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Women with metastatic breast cancer (BC) are at risk of developing brain metastases (BrM), which may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Given the emergence of systemic therapies with activity in the brain, more breast oncology clinical trials include patients with BrM, but most require extracranial disease progression for trial participation.

METHODS

We evaluated the proportion of patients with BC BrM who have intracranial disease progression in the setting of stable extracranial disease in a retrospective cohort study of 751 patients treated between 2008 and 2018 at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer. Extracranial disease progression was defined as any progression outside of the brain within 4 weeks of a patient's local/regional treatment. Clinical/pathologic characteristics and outcomes were also abstracted from patients' medical records.

RESULTS

Of 752 patients in the cohort, 691 were included in our study. Sixty-one patients were excluded due to the presence of a second primary tumor or uncertain tissue origin of the BrM. BC subtype based on the primary tumor was known for 592 (85.6%) patients; 33.1% (n = 196) had HER2+ disease, 40% (n = 237) had HR+/HER2- disease, and 26.9% (n = 159) had triple negative BC. Extracranial disease status was available for 677 patients (98%); 41.1% (n = 284/691) had stable extracranial disease and 56.8% (n = 393/691) had extracranial disease progression within 4 weeks of treatment for BrM.

DISCUSSION

A high proportion of patients with BC BrM (41.1%) would be excluded from clinical trials due to stable extracranial disease. Efforts should be made to design trials for this patient population.

Re-examining prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are at high risk for brain metastases. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended in this population to reduce the incidence of brain metastases and prolong survival. We aimed to assesses the efficacy of PCI in this population in the era of routine brain imaging. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the use among patients who were radiographically confirmed not to have brain metastases after completion of first-line therapy.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, cohort studies and controlled trials reporting on the use of PCI for patients SCLC were identified in EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and grey literature sources. The literature search was conducted on November 12, 2023. Summary data were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled hazard ratios (HR) for the primary outcome of overall survival between PCI and no intervention groups. This study is registered with the Open Science Framework, DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/BC359, and PROSPERO, CRD42021249466.

Findings

Of 4318 identified records, 223 were eligible for inclusion. 109 reported on overall survival in formats amenable to meta-analysis; PCI was associated with longer survival in all patients with SCLC (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.55-0.63; p < 0.001; n = 56,770 patients), patients with limited stage disease (HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.55-0.65; p < 0.001; n = 78 studies; n = 27,137 patients), and patients with extensive stage disease (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.70; p < 0.001; n = 28 studies; n = 26,467 patients). Between-study heterogeneity was significant when pooled amongst all studies (I2 = 73.6%; 95% CI 68.4%-77.9%). Subgroup analysis did not reveal sources of heterogeneity. In a subgroup analysis on studies that used magnetic resonance imaging to exclude presence of brain metastases at restaging among all patients, overall survival did not differ significantly between patients who did or did not receive PCI (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.52-1.05; p = 0.08; n = 9 studies; n = 1384 patients).

Interpretation

Our findings suggested that administration of PCI is associated with a survival benefit, but not when considering studies that radiographically confirmed absence of brain metastases, suggesting that the survival benefit conferred by PCI might be therapeutic rather than prophylactic.

Funding

No funding.

Toxicity and outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: the risk of subsequent symptomatic intralesional hemorrhage exceeds that of radiation necrosis

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the outcomes and patterns of toxicity in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without immunotherapy (IO).

METHODS

From a prospective registry, we reviewed MBM patients treated with single fraction Gamma Knife SRS between 2008 and 2021 at our center. We recorded all systemic therapies (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy) administered before, during, or after SRS. Patients with prior brain surgery were excluded. We captured adverse events following SRS, including intralesional hemorrhage (IH), radiation necrosis (RN) and local failure (LF), as well as extracranial disease status. Distant brain failure (DBF), extracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using a cumulative Incidence function and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 165 patients with 570 SRS-treated MBM. Median OS for patients who received IO was 1.41 years versus 0.79 years in patients who did not (p = 0.04). Ipilimumab monotherapy was the most frequent IO regimen (30%). In the absence of IO, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2 +) RN was 3% at 24 months and remained unchanged with respect to the type or timing of IO. The incidence of post-SRS g2 + IH in patients who did not receive systemic therapy was 19% at 1- and 2 years compared to 7% at 1- and 2 years among patients who did (HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.046). Overall, neither timing nor type of IO correlated to rates of DBF, OS, or LF. Among patients treated with IO, the median time to extracranial PFS was 5.4 months (95% IC 3.2 - 9.1).

CONCLUSION

The risk of g2 + IH exceeds that of g2 + RN in MBM patients undergoing SRS, with or without IO. IH should be considered a critical adverse event following MBM treatments.