Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment for COVID-19 With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Molnupiravir Among Patients Living in Nursing Homes

Advances in the effectiveness and safety of azvudine treatment: a comprehensive review

The global impact of COVID-19 has highlighted the urgent need for effective therapeutic interventions against SARS-CoV-2. Azvudine, a dual-target nucleoside drug initially developed for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), has gained attention for its potential in treating COVID-19. On 25 July 2022, Azvudine received conditional approval from the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China, making it the first oral SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) inhibitor for COVID-19 treatment. This review explores the pharmacological activity, antiviral mechanisms, and clinical effectiveness of azvudine in the context of COVID-19. Clinical trials have demonstrated its ability to reduce the viral load, shorten the time to nucleic acid negativity, and improve clinical outcomes in patients. Additionally, azvudine has shown excellent pharmacokinetic properties and a favorable safety profile with mild side effects. The review also addresses the importance of drug interactions and safety considerations, particularly in high-risk populations. Research should focus on optimizing second-generation inhibitors with enhanced effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 variants, improving oral bioavailability, and minimizing adverse effects, ensuring more robust treatment options for COVID-19.

Measures to Prevent and Control COVID-19 in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Scoping Review

Importance

Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) experienced high mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading them to adopt preventive measures to counteract viral spread. A critical appraisal of these measures is essential to support SNFs in managing future infectious disease outbreaks.

Objective

To perform a scoping review of data and evidence on the use and effectiveness of preventive measures implemented from 2020 to 2024 to prevent COVID-19 infection in SNFs in the US.

Evidence Review

Two analyses were performed. First, an analysis of the federal COVID-19 SNF Database was conducted to describe time trends in COVID-19 incidence, deaths, testing, vaccination, and treatment among SNF residents and staff, as well as shortages in staff and personal protective equipment (PPE). Then, a comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2023 to April 2024 to identify high-quality evidence on the use and effectiveness of modifiable preventive measures used among SNF residents. Both nonpharmacologic (facility characteristics, PPE, cohorting, and isolation, visitation, staffing, testing) and pharmacologic (vaccination, treatment) measures were reviewed.

Findings

Nationwide data indicated early shortages of PPE, infrequent testing, and persistent staff shortages in SNFs. Other nonpharmacologic measures, such as visitor restrictions or ventilation modifications, were widely adopted but there were no available national data to quantify their effectiveness. These nonpharmacologic measures lacked high-quality studies to verify effectiveness. In contrast, the effectiveness of vaccination and antiviral treatment was shown in multiple studies. Evidence also showed associations between COVID-19 outcomes in residents and crowding, staff size, hours per residents and networks, and surveillance testing of residents and staff. Despite high initial uptake, up-to-date vaccination status was suboptimal in residents and staff from 2022 to 2024. Only a minority of infected residents received antiviral treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

This scoping review found that although many preventive measures were implemented in SNFs in the US throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, few were based on clear evidence of their effectiveness. Pharmacologic measures, such as vaccination and antiviral treatment, had more robust evidence supporting their efficacy than nonpharmacologic interventions. Using the scarce resources and staff of SNFs on measures of questionable effectiveness could distract from known effective ones such as vaccination and antiviral treatment. When possible, implementation efforts should be commensurate with the demonstrated effectiveness of available preventive measures.

Comparing the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation study

AIMS

To compare the effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Territory-wide electronic health records in Hong Kong were used to perform target trial emulation using a sequential trial approach. Patients (1) aged ≥18 years, (2) with T2DM, (3) with COVID-19 infection, and (4) who received molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within 5 days of infection between 16 March 2022 and 31 December 2022 in non-hospital and hospital settings were included. Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators were matched using one-to-one propensity-score matching and followed for 28 days. Risk of outcomes was compared between groups by Cox regression adjusted for baseline characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed on age (<70 years, ≥70 years), sex, Charlson comorbidity index (<4, ≥4), and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses (<2 doses, ≥2 doses).

RESULTS

Totals of 17 974 non-hospitalized (8987 in each group) and 3678 hospitalized (1839 in each group) patients were identified. Non-hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had lower risk of all-cause mortality (absolute risk reduction [ARR] at 28 days 0.80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-1.04; hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.73) and hospitalization (ARR at 28 days 4.01%, 95% CI 3.19-4.83; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66-0.82) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Hospitalized nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiators had reduced risk of all-cause mortality (ARR at 28 days 2.94%, 95% CI 1.65-4.23; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.80) as compared with molnupiravir initiators. Consistent findings were found across all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir may be preferred to molnupiravir for COVID-19 patients with T2DM and without contraindication to either treatment.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and the Omicron Variant of COVID-19 Prognosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the prognosis of COVID-19 patients infected with the Omicron variant. The primary objective was to determine if COVID-19 patients with COPD had higher mortality rates compared to those without COPD. Secondary objectives included assessing the risk of respiratory failure, hospital stay length, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and oxygen requirements in COPD patients with COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 2761 COVID-19 patients admitted to the Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, between January 1 and June 30, 2022. Among them, 7.4% (n = 205) had COPD. Demographic and clinical data, including vaccination status and comorbidities, were collected. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included respiratory support requirement, hospital stay length, and ICU admission. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

COPD did not independently increase the risk of COVID-19 mortality after adjusting for confounders. Instead, older age, male sex, incomplete vaccination, long-term oxygen therapy use, and specific comorbidities were identified as significant predictors of 30-day mortality. COPD patients were more likely to require oxygen and noninvasive ventilation, but there were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes compared to non-COPD patients.

CONCLUSION

COPD itself was not an independent risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. Age, sex, vaccination status, comorbidities, and long-term oxygen therapy use were important predictors of mortality. These findings underscore the importance of considering multiple factors when assessing the impact of COPD on COVID-19 prognosis, particularly with the Omicron variant.

Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Older Patients with COVID-19: A Comprehensive Review

The consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are particularly severe in older adults with a disproportionate number of severe and fatal outcomes. Therefore, this integrative review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical characteristics, management approaches, and prognosis of older patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Common clinical presentations in older patients include fever, cough, and dyspnea. Additionally, preexisting comorbidities, especially diabetes and pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases, were frequently observed and associated with adverse outcomes. Management strategies varied, however, early diagnosis, vigilant monitoring, and multidisciplinary care were identified as key factors for enhancing patient outcomes. Nonetheless, the prognosis remains guarded for older patients, with increased rates of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. However, timely therapeutic interventions, especially antiviral and supportive treatments, have demonstrated some efficacy in mitigating the severe consequences in this age group. In conclusion, while older adults remain highly susceptible to severe outcomes from COVID-19, early intervention, rigorous monitoring, and comprehensive care can play a pivotal role in improving their clinical outcomes.

Paxlovid use is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular diseases in COVID-19 patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Paxlovid has been shown to be effective in reducing mortality and hospitalization rates in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is not known whether Paxlovid can reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in COVID-19-surviving patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs).

METHODS

TriNetX data from the US Collaborative Network were used in this study. A total of 5,671,395 patients with AIRDs were enrolled between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. People diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in the cohort (n = 238,142) from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. The Study population was divided into two groups based on Paxlovid use. Propensity score matching was used to generate groups with matched baseline characteristics. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals of cardiovascular outcomes, admission rate, mortality rate, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate were calculated between Paxlovid and non-Paxlovid groups. Subgroup analyses on sex, age, race, autoimmune diseases group, and sensitivity analyses for Paxlovid use within the first day or within 2-5 days of COVID-19 diagnosis were performed.

RESULTS

Paxlovid use was associated with lower risks of cerebrovascular complications (HR = 0.65 [0.47-0.88]), arrhythmia outcomes (HR = 0.81 [0.68-0.94]), ischemic heart disease, other cardiac disorders (HR = 0.51 [0.35-0.74]) naming heart failure (HR = 0.41 [0.26-0.63]) and deep vein thrombosis (HR = 0.46 [0.24-0.87]) belonging to thrombotic disorders in AIRD patients with COVID-19. Compared with the Non-Paxlovid group, risks of major adverse cardiac events (HR = 0.56 [0.44-0.70]) and any cardiovascular outcome mentioned above (HR = 0.76 [0.66-0.86]) were lower in the Paxlovid group. Moreover, the mortality (HR = 0.21 [0.11-0.40]), admission (HR = 0.68 [0.60-0.76]), and ICU admission rates (HR = 0.52 [0.33-0.80]) were significantly lower in the Paxlovid group than in the non-Paxlovid group. Paxlovid appears to be more effective in male, older, and Black patients with AIRD. The risks of cardiovascular outcomes and severe conditions were reduced significantly with Paxlovid prescribed within the first day of COVID-19 diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Paxlovid use is associated with a lower risk of CVDs and severe conditions in COVID-19-surviving patients with AIRD.

Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir on severe outcomes of COVID-19 in the era of vaccination and Omicron: An updated meta-analysis

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR) was approved to treat SARS-CoV-2 positive outpatients at high risk of progression to severe disease, based on a randomized trial in unvaccinated patients. Effectiveness in vaccinated patients and against Omicron has not yet been confirmed by clinical trial data, but a recent meta-analysis suggested good real-world effectiveness based on 12 studies. We updated this meta-analysis by searching Medline and Embase databases for studies assessing effectiveness of NR on mortality, hospitalization, composite outcome of hospitalization and/or death, and progression to severe disease, published between October 1, 2022 and May 22, 2023. Random effects meta-analysis and subgroup analysis for vaccinated patients was performed. A total of 32 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled RR for the effect of NR on mortality, hospitalization, hospitalization and/or mortality, and progression to severe disease were 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.52), 0.43 (CI: 0.37-0.51), 0.52 (CI: 0.45-0.61) and 0.54 (CI: 0.41-0.73), respectively. A subgroup analysis on vaccinated patients indicated lower effectiveness of NR on mortality (RR: 0.55, CI: 0.45-0.68), but similar effectiveness for hospitalization, hospitalization and/or mortality, or progression to severe disease (RR: 0.52, 0.58, and 0.66, respectively). This updated meta-analysis robustly confirms the protective effects of NR on severe COVID-19 outcomes.

Effect of pre-hospitalization use of oral antiviral agents on reducing critical illness and mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of administering nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir before hospitalisation on subsequent critical illness among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who required hospitalisation between 1 January 1 2022 and 31 August 2022. The primary outcomes were the development of critical illness, including intensive care unit admission, use of mechanical ventilation, or mortality. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the varying risks of critical illness and mortality. A total of 1,011 COVID-19 patients were analysed. Among them, 304 (30.1%) received molnupiravir and 131 (13.0%) received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir before hospitalisation.

RESULTS

There were significant reductions for critical illness (adjusted odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.39, P < 0.001) and mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.59, P < 0.001) in patients receiving oral antivirals compared with those who did not. No significant differences in critical illness were observed between molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The combination of COVID-19 vaccines and oral antivirals can further reduce the risk of critical illness in high-risk populations.

CONCLUSION

Administering molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir before hospitalisation reduced the risk of COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe pneumonia progressing to critical illness and mortality.

Safety and Effectiveness of Molnupiravir in Japanese Patients with COVID-19: Final Report of Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Molnupiravir is an orally available prodrug of N-hydroxycytidine that received special approval for emergency treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan in December 2021 and full approval in April 2023. To assess the real-world safety and effectiveness of molnupiravir in Japanese patients with COVID-19, we conducted nationwide post-marketing surveillance to collect data at registered institutions in Japan.

METHODS

The surveillance data were collected from December 27, 2021, to May 2, 2023. All reported adverse events were collected for safety analysis. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were assessed by the treating physicians. Effectiveness was assessed by the composite of hospitalization or all-cause death in outpatients and the composite of oxygen/mechanical ventilation initiation or all-cause death in inpatients. The observation period was from molnupiravir initiation through day 29.

RESULTS

Of 3214 patients enrolled in the survey, 3179 were analyzed for safety. At baseline, 52.31% (1663/3179) of patients were male, the median (range) age was 69.0 (18-107) years, 82.38% (2619/3179) received COVID-19 vaccines, and 95.72% (3043/3179) had risk factors for severe COVID-19 illness. COVID-19 severity at baseline was mild in 86.44% (2748/3179) and moderate I in 10.22% (325/3179). A total of 205 ADRs occurred in 5.50% (175/3179) of patients; ADRs that occurred in > 0.5% of patients were diarrhea (1.86% [59/3179]) and rash (0.69% [22/3179]). Seven serious ADRs were reported in seven patients. In the effectiveness analysis population, the incidence of all-cause death through day 29 was 1.14% (34/2988), and the incidence of death through day 29 related to COVID-19 was 0.40% (12/2988). The cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint was 2.34% (47/2006) in outpatients and 4.60% (38/826) in inpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale survey showed that molnupiravir was safe and effective in real-world settings in highly vaccinated Japanese patients with COVID-19, including older patients and those with comorbidities.