Outcomes Following Early Postoperative Adjuvant Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

Optimizing post-acute care inpatient rehabilitation for patients with brain metastasis: A systematic review of functional outcomes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to provide insight into optimizing inpatient rehabilitation (IR) for patients with brain metastases (BM) following hospitalization, including exploring functional outcomes and reviewing interdisciplinary considerations.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, a search of PubMed and Embase was conducted to identify studies demonstrating functional outcomes of IR for patients with brain metastases.

RESULTS

Three studies met inclusion criteria and a total of 59 patients with brain metastasis underwent IR. The median length of IR was 19.2 days (range: 17.95 - 20). Discharge destination after IR is available for 39 patients, including 33 (84.6%) who were discharged home, 1 (2.6%) who was discharged to a long-term care facility, 3 (7.7%) to an acute care ward, and 2 (5.1%) to palliative care. All 3 studies (n=59) used the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) to assess function after IR. The weighted average total FIM percent gain between admission and discharge was 14.9% (range: 9.6% - 27.4%) and the average FIM efficiency was 0.61 (range: 0.45 - 0.94). For the 2 studies (n=46) that reported motor and cognitive FIM, the weighted average motor gain (16.5%) was greater than the cognitive gain (3.6%).

CONCLUSION

Inpatient rehabilitation (IR) may enhance functional status and independence in patients with brain metastases during the interim post-hospitalization period, optimizing functional performance for a smoother transition to subsequent oncologic treatments. Healthcare providers within the multidisciplinary team should optimize the post-acute hospitalization period by considering both functional status and oncologic prognosis in patients with brain metastases to streamline rehabilitation efforts and minimize delays in oncologic care.

Factors associated with local failure after stereotactic radiation to the surgical bed of patients with a single breast cancer metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are increasingly common due to improved systemic therapies prolonging survival. This study evaluates local control and factors influencing outcomes in patients with resected BCBM treated with postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

METHODS

A retrospective review included single resected BCBM treated with postoperative SRT from 2010 to 2022. The median follow-up was 28 months (range, 14-43). Variables analyzed included tumor size, biology, surgical corridor inclusion, radiation dose, and timing of SRT. Multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox regression.

RESULTS

62 patients were analyzed in multivariable analysis, HER2-positive status was associated with improved local control (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.36-0.88, p = 0.032), as was a higher biologically effective dose (BED > 40 Gy, HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.89, p = 0.028). In contrast, tumor size > 5 cm (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.7-4.6, p = 0.021) and delayed initiation of SRT beyond 28 days post-surgery (HR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.9-4.7, p = 0.015) were associated with worse outcomes. Age, cystic metastases, inclusion of surgical corridor, and tumor location were not significantly related to local control. Radiation necrosis occurred in 13% of patients, predominantly asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative SRT provides effective local control in resected BCBM. In multivariable analysis, HER2 positivity, higher BED, and timely SRT significantly influenced outcomes, while larger tumor size and delayed treatment were negative prognostic factors. Future research should optimize dosimetric strategies and integrate systemic therapy to improve local and intracranial control.

Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastases: An International, Multicenter, Single-Arm Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Previous reports have suggested that neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BrMets) mitigates the elevated risks of radiation necrosis (RN) and meningeal recurrence associated with adjuvant SRS. We report treatment outcomes from a multicenter phase II trial (NCT03368625) of single-fraction neoadjuvant SRS for large BrMets.

METHODS

Patients with 1 index BrMet requiring resection and up to 9 nonindex BrMets not requiring resection were recruited across 3 centers and treated with single-fraction SRS (14-21 Gy) targeting the index lesion with a 2-mm margin, followed by surgical resection. Nonindex lesions were targeted with definitive SRS. The primary end point was 1-year rate of grade 2+ RN affecting the index lesion. Secondary end points included median overall survival, 2-year intracranial progression-free survival, and 1-year rates of local failure (LF) affecting the index lesion, leptomeningeal disease, and pachymeningeal disease.

RESULTS

Between April 2018 and November 2022, 35 patients were enrolled; the median follow-up period was 11.8 months (IQR: 6.14, 15.9). No patients developed grade 2+ RN. Six patients experienced LF (1-year rate: 18.0% [95% CI: 7.03, 32.9]); 1 patient developed classic leptomeningeal disease (1-year rate: 2.9% [95% CI: 0.21, 12.9]), and 1 patient developed pachymeningeal disease (1-year rate: 3.2% [95% CI: 0.22, 14.6]). The median overall survival was 13.8 months (95% CI: 8.15, 22.4), and the 2-year intracranial progression-free survival was 29.5% (95% CI: 13.8, 63.1).

CONCLUSION

In this study, no patients experienced symptomatic RN and the incidence of meningeal failure was lower than historical rates associated with postoperative SRS. However, the high 1-year rate of LF suggests a potential benefit for higher or fractionated radiation doses or larger clinical target volume margins.

Survival Among Patients With ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Central Nervous System Disease

Importance

Approximately one-third of patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive (ERBB2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) develop brain metastasis. It is unclear whether patients with disease limited to the central nervous system (CNS) have different outcomes and causes of death compared with those with concomitant extracranial metastasis.

Objective

To assess overall survival (OS) and CNS-related mortality among patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer and a diagnosis of CNS disease by disease distribution (CNS only vs CNS plus extracranial metastasis).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with ERBB2+ MBC and CNS disease, including parenchymal brain metastasis, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), or dural metastasis, who were treated between August 2010 and April 2022 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Data were analyzed between December 2023 and August 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival, estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and CNS-related mortality with cumulative incidence.

Results

The cohort included 274 patients (272 [99.3%] female). The median age was 53.7 years (range, 28.7-87.4 years); 125 patients (45.6%) presented with de novo MBC. At CNS metastasis diagnosis, 73 (26.6%) presented with CNS-only disease. There was a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range, 0.2-12.0 years) from CNS disease diagnosis among those alive at the end of follow-up. Both OS and CNS-related death were significantly correlated with the pattern of presentation: OS was shortest among patients with LMD (1.24 years; 95% CI, 0.89-2.08 years) followed by those with extracranial metastasis (2.16 years; 95% CI, 1.87-2.58 years) and was longest among patients with parenchymal or dural CNS disease only (3.57 years; 95% CI, 2.10-5.63 years) (P = .001). Of 192 patients (70.1%) who died, 106 (55.2%) died of a CNS-related cause. The group with CNS-only disease remained at high risk of death from CNS causes, with a 3-year CNS-related death rate of 33.98% (95% CI, 22.84%-45.43%) and a 3-year death rate from other causes of 6.07% (95% CI, 1.93%-13.69%). On multivariable modeling for CNS-related death, LMD (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.19-2.93; P = .007) and treatment with whole-brain radiotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13-2.58; P = .01) were associated with CNS-related death.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, 55.2% of deaths among patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer and brain metastasis were due to CNS-related causes, with the greatest risk among patients with LMD. CNS-only presentation was associated with improved survival but a higher rate of CNS-related death, supporting an approach of aggressive local therapy for select patients.

Preoperative versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Resection is often the primary treatment for large brain tumors but is less practical for multiple brain metastases (BM). Current guidelines recommend stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for untreated BMs or following the surgical removal of a solitary BM to reduce the risk of local tumor recurrence. Preoperative SRS (pre-SRS) shows promise with fewer complications and more precise targeting, but it lacks tissue diagnosis and may hinder wound healing. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of pre-SRS and postoperative SRS (post-SRS) for BM treatment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected based on PICO criteria, including patients with metastatic intracranial lesions undergoing preoperative or postoperative radiosurgery. Data related to outcomes and complications were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed, employing the fixed effect model due to study design similarities and limited patient numbers. Four studies encompassing 616 BM patients (221 preoperative, 405 postoperative) were included. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, cancer source, and lesion location, were similar between groups. Radiosurgery modalities included LINAC and Gamma Knife, with hypofractionated treatments more common postoperatively. Outcomes showed comparable overall survival (p = 0.07), local failure (p = 0.26), and distant failure rates (p = 0.84) between groups. The preoperative group had lower risks of radiation necrosis (p = 0.02) and leptomeningeal disease (p = 0.03) in 1-year follow-up, with significantly better composite outcomes (p = 0.04). No significant difference in wound issues was observed (p = 0.98). This review reveals pre- and post-SRS for BM have similar outcomes for LF, DF, and OS. Pre-SRS potentially lowers RN and LMD risks, with better tumor targeting and less radiation to healthy tissue, while post-SRS targets residual disease but with higher complication risks. Future research should optimize SRS protocols.

Consortium for Intracranial Metastasis Academic Research (CIMARa): Global interdisciplinary collaborations to improve outcomes of patient with brain metastases

Brain metastases (BrM) arising from solid tumors is an ever-increasing and often devastating clinical challenge impacting hundreds of thousands of patients annually worldwide. As systemic anticancer therapies, and thus survival, improve, the risk for central nervous system (CNS) recurrence has increased. Historically, patients with BrM were excluded from clinical trials; however, there has been a shift toward increasing inclusion over the past decade. To most effectively design the next generation of clinical trials for patients with BrM, a multidisciplinary team spanning local and systemic therapies is imperative. CIMARa (Consortium for Intracranial Metastasis Academic Research), formalized in June 2021, is an inclusive group of multidisciplinary clinical investigators, research scientists, and advocates who share the collective goal of improving outcomes for patients with BrM. CIMARa aims to improve outcomes through the development, coordination, and awareness of multi-institutional clinical trials testing novel therapeutic agents for this unique patient population alongside the translation of preclinical research to the clinical setting.

Early experience and perioperative risk of GammaTile for upfront brain metastases: Report from a prospective multicenter study

Background

GammaTile (GT), a form of brachytherapy utilizing cesium-131 seeds in a bioresorbable collagen tile, has gained popularity for the treatment of recurrent intracranial tumors and more recently for newly diagnosed metastases. This study reports early experience utilizing GT in upfront brain metastases with a focus on clinical applications and perioperative safety.

Methods

The STaRT Registry (NCT04427384) was queried for all patients receiving GT for upfront metastases from August 2021 to August 2023. Data regarding patient demographics, procedure details, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted and analyzed.

Results

Twenty-eight patients, median age 65 years (range 28-81), with 30 treated metastases were reported from 6 institutions. Patients had 2.8 metastases on average (range 1-15) at the time of surgery; however, most patients had a single metastasis (60.7%). The mean diameter of treated metastases was 3.4 cm (range 1.5-4.7). A median of 4.0 tiles (range 1-10) were used per tumor. The median follow-up was 3.0 months (range 1.0-11.2) with 6 attributed AEs (21.4%), including 1 grade ≥ 3 (infection). In the immediate postoperative period (<14 days), 2 patients reported pain or headache, and 1 reported facial edema. One patient developed seizures on postoperative day 8 requiring medication. At 1-month follow-up, there was 1 superficial wound infection, in a previously colonized patient, requiring surgical intervention without explantation of tiles. At 3-month follow-up, 1 patient reported facial pain not requiring treatment. There were no symptomatic hematomas.

Conclusions

GT demonstrates a favorable safety profile in upfront brain metastases with a 3.6% rate of serious AEs (grade ≥ 3) within 90 days of the procedure.

Intracranial Outcomes of De Novo Brain Metastases Treated With Osimertinib Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

Introduction

Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC have a high incidence of brain metastases. The EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib has intracranial activity, making the role of local central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapies, such as radiation and surgery, less clear.

Methods

Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases who received osimertinib as initial therapy after brain metastasis diagnosis were included. Individual lesion responses were assessed using adapted RANO-BM criteria. CNS progression and local progression of brain metastasis from osimertinib start were analyzed using cumulative incidence treating death as a competing risk. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results

There were 36 patients who had a median interval from brain metastasis diagnosis to first-line osimertinib initiation of 25 days. In total, 136 previously untreated brain metastases were tracked from baseline. Overall, 105 lesions (77.2%) had complete response and 31 had partial response reflecting best objective response of 100%. Best response occurred at a median of 96 days (range: 28-1113 d) from baseline magnetic resonance imaging. This reflects a best objective response rate of 100%. Two-year overall survival was 80%. CNS progression rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-years post-osimertinib were 21%, 32%, and 41%, respectively. Lesion-level local failure was estimated to be 0.7% and 4.7% at 1- and 2-years post-osimertinib, respectively. No clinicodemographic factors including brain metastasis number were associated with post-osimertinib progression.

Conclusions

Intracranial response to osimertinib is excellent for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with de novo, previously untreated brain metastases. Very low local failure rates support a strategy of upfront osimertinib alone in selected patients.