Mobile Application-Based Communication Facilitation Platform for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Palliative and End-of-Life Care During Critical Cardiovascular Illness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cardiac intensive care units are witnessing a demographic shift, characterized by patients with increasingly complex or end-stage cardiovascular disease with a greater burden of concomitant comorbid noncardiovascular disease. Despite technical advances in care that may be offered, many critically ill cardiovascular patients will nevertheless experience significant morbidity and mortality during the acute decompensation, including physical and psychological suffering. Palliative care, with its specialized focus on alleviating suffering, aligns treatments with patient and caregiver values and improves overall care planning. Integrating palliative care into cardiovascular disease management extends the therapeutic approach beyond life-sustaining measures to encompass life-enhancing goals, addressing the physical, emotional, psychosocial, and spiritual needs of critically ill patients. This American Heart Association scientific statement aims to explore the definitions and conceptual framework of palliative care and to suggest strategies to integrate palliative care principles into the management of patients with critical cardiovascular illness.

Development and Deployment of a Music Listening Intervention Mobile Application for a Two-Group Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Music is one nonpharmacological intervention to reduce anxiety and stress for mechanically ventilated patients. Efficient delivery of a music listening intervention can be enhanced through digital tools such as a mobile application (app) loaded onto an electronic tablet device. The objective of this study is to describe the iterative development and deployment of a novel app (Soundese) to deliver, record, and retrieve data associated with a two-arm randomized, blinded clinical trial testing music listening intervention compared to control silence condition on delirium severity among critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) older adult patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support. The Soundese mobile app was developed to deliver either experimental music listening intervention or a silence control listening condition to a sample of older adults receiving mechanical ventilatory support in the ICU and retrieve all protocol data. The Soundese app was developed using the Swift software language and is compatible with all iOS devices. The Soundese app consists of two components: (1) a mobile app that delivers the assigned, blinded listening intervention from an iPad through headphones to each subject and automatically logs each listening session, its duration, the randomization arm, and uploads these data to a server, and (2) an analysis app that generates a spreadsheet with summarized data of the respective listening session, music details, and reports for further analyses. A Dropbox application programmer interface enabled the secure storage of files on a designated Dropbox account. After initial field testing and iterative development changes based on research staff feedback, the Soundese app delivers the assigned experimental listening condition or silence control condition when deployed remotely in the field. The app's mobile nature allows for immediate and automatic data capture, which is summarized for statistical analysis. There is no need for any manual recording of any intervention data by busy ICU staff, including listening time or music selections. The Soundese mobile app efficiently delivers the research protocol with fidelity and collects the necessary data for an ICU-based clinical trial. The app may be useful in other clinical trials testing music listening interventions in various settings or for deploying other audio-based interventions.

Perspectives on Implementing a Communication Facilitator Intervention From a Critical Care Setting

CONTEXT

Critically-ill patients and their families often experience communication challenges during their ICU stay and across care transitions. An intervention using communication facilitators may help address these challenges.

OBJECTIVES

Using clinicians' perspectives, we identified facilitators and barriers to implementing a communication intervention.

METHODS

Using purposive sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 clinicians from an intensive care unit at an academic health center that participated in a randomized trial of communication facilitators. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide data collection and analysis.

RESULTS

CFIR constructs of relative advantage, communication, and critical incidents facilitated the intervention's implementation. CFIR constructs of access to knowledge and information, relational connections, and clinician knowledge and belief hindered its implementation. Clinicians reported that facilitators provided continuity to patients and families, support in a trusting and proactive manner over transitions of care, and bridged communication between families and clinicians particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. Limited information about the intervention prevented clinicians from working with facilitators earlier in the course of the intervention. Differences in beliefs regarding facilitator involvement during family meetings also hampered the intervention's implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies should incorporate implementation strategies that help connect facilitators to clinicians early in the intervention period which may improve role clarity and enhance collaboration.

Mobile App-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Critically Ill Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Few person-centered, scalable models of collaborative intensive care unit (ICU) clinician-palliative care specialist care exist.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of a collaborative palliative care intervention compared to usual care among family members of patients in the ICU.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This parallel-group randomized clinical trial with patient-level randomization was conducted between April 2021 and September 2023. The study was set at 6 medical and surgical ICUs in 1 academic hospital and 1 community hospital. The study participants included critically ill older adult patients with 1 of 11 poor outcome phenotypes, their family members with elevated palliative care needs, and their attending ICU physicians.

Intervention

An automated electronic health record-integrated, mobile application-based communication platform that displayed family-reported needs over 7 days, coached ICU attending physicians on addressing needs, and prompted palliative care consultation if needs were not reduced within 3 study days.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was change in the family-reported Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) score between study days 1 and 3. The 13-item NEST score is a number between 0 and 130, with higher scores indicating a greater need. Secondary outcomes included quality of communication and goal of care concordance, as well as 3-month psychological distress.

Results

Of 151 family members, the mean (SD) age was 57.4 (12.9) years, and 110 (72.9%) were female. Of 151 patients, the mean (SD) age was 69.8 (9.7) years, and 86 (57.0%) were male. Thirty-five ICU physicians were male (68.6%). Seventy-six patients were randomized to the intervention group and 75 to the control group. Treatment group differences in estimated mean NEST scores were similar at 3 days between the intervention and control groups (-3.1 vs -2.0, respectively; estimated mean difference in differences, -1.3 points [95% CI, -6.0 to 3.5]) and 7 days (-2.3 vs -2.2, respectively; estimated mean difference in differences, 0 points [95% CI, -6.2 to 6.2]). Median (IQR) need scores were lower among individuals who remained in the ICU at day 3 for intervention participants vs controls (24.5 [16.5-34.5] vs 27.5 [13.0-40.0], respectively); median (IQR) need scores were also lower among those who remained in the ICU at day 7 for intervention vs controls (22.0 [11.0-35.0] vs 28.0 [14.0-35.0], respectively). Goal concordance, quality of communication, and psychological distress symptoms did not differ. Twenty-nine intervention participants (38.2%) had palliative care consultations, compared to only 3 (4.0%) among controls, (P < .001); 66 intervention participants (87.0%) had a family meeting, compared to 48 (64.0%) among controls (P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, a collaborative, person-centered, ICU-based palliative care intervention had no effect on palliative care needs or psychological distress compared to usual care despite a higher frequency of palliative care consultations and family meetings among intervention participants.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04414787.

Identification of unmet information needs among families of critically ill patients and their association with post-intensive care syndrome-family: protocol for a single-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Families of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) need a variety of information about the patient. Meeting these information needs improves the quality of communication between the family and ICU staff, as well as reduces the risk of post-intensive care syndrome-family (PICS-F). However, information needs continue to be unmet, and information regarding which specific information needs are met or unmet is insufficient. Additionally, the unmet needs that affect PICS-F are unknown. Therefore, this study aims to identify the unmet information needs of families of patients admitted to the ICU in terms of communication with ICU staff and determine their association with PICS-F.

METHODS

This study will be a single-center cross-sectional study using a questionnaire survey. The participants will include family members of patients admitted to the emergency ICU of the Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital in Japan. Eligibility for participation will be assessed from medical records, and family members of patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be identified and sent a questionnaire. PICS-F and unmet information needs will be assessed 1 to 12 months after patients leave the ICU. PICS-F assessment will include the evaluation of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and prolonged grief disorder. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses will be used to examine the association between PICS-F and unmet information needs.

DISCUSSION

This study will fill a research gap in communication between ICU staff and families of ICU patients by examining the information that tends not to be provided or understood by families, thereby providing an understanding of the information that is likely to be an unmet information need. Additionally, this study can contribute to the development of future communication strategies by investigating which unmet information needs are associated with PICS-F risk, thus emphasizing the information needs that should be given priority when developing effective communication strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Center Clinical Trials Registry UMIN 000053813.

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines on end of life and palliative care in the intensive care unit

The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) has developed evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions about end-of-life (EoL) and palliative care for critically ill adults to optimize patient-centered care, improving outcomes of relatives, and supporting intensive care unit (ICU) staff in delivering compassionate and effective EoL and palliative care. An international multi-disciplinary panel of clinical experts, a methodologist, and representatives of patients and families examined key domains, including variability across countries, decision-making, palliative-care integration, communication, family-centered care, and conflict management. Eight evidence-based recommendations (6 of low level of evidence and 2 of high level of evidence) and 19 expert opinions were presented. EoL legislation and the importance of respecting the autonomy and preferences of patients were given close attention. Differences in EoL care depending on country income and healthcare provision were considered. Structured EoL decision-making strategies are recommended to improve outcomes of patients and relatives, as well as staff satisfaction and mental health. Early integration of palliative care and the use of standardized tools for symptom assessment are suggested for patients at high risk of dying. Communication training for ICU staff and printed communication aids for families are advocated to improve outcomes and satisfaction. Methods for enhancing family-centeredness of care include structured family conferences and culturally sensitive interventions. Conflict-management protocols and strategies to prevent burnout among healthcare professionals are also considered. The work done to develop these guidelines highlights many areas requiring further research.

Palliative Care Clinicians' Views on Metrics for Successful Specialist Palliative Care Delivery in the ICU

CONTEXT

A quarter of palliative care (PC) clinicians' consultations are now requested from the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite this high usage, a standardized set of quality metrics for PC delivery in the ICU does not exist.

OBJECTIVES

To explore PC clinicians' views on how to best measure quality of care delivery in their role as a consultant in the ICU setting.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a parent dataset consisting of qualitative data from semi-structured interviews exploring ways to optimize PC clinicians' role in the ICU. Nineteen participants were recruited across five academic medical centers in the US. Participants included PC physicians (n = 14), nurse practitioners (n = 2), and social workers (n = 3). Thematic analysis with an inductive approach was used to generate themes.

RESULTS

We identified two central themes: difficulties in measuring PC quality in the ICU (theme 1) and tension between the role of PC and metrics (theme 2). Theme 1 had two subthemes related to logistical challenges in measuring outcomes and PC clinicians' preference for metrics that incorporate subjective feedback from patients, family members, and the primary ICU team. Theme 2 described how PC clinicians often felt a disconnect between the goal of meeting a metric and their goals in delivering high-quality clinical care.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide insight into PC clinician perspectives on quality metrics and identify major barriers that need to be addressed to successfully implement quality measurement in the ICU setting.

The impact of patient communication software app on facilitating communication with mechanically ventilated patients: A randomized clinical trial

Background & Aim

The use of mechanical ventilation devices as a supportive respiratory system for hospitalized patients in intensive care units is often accompanied by the inability of alert patients to establish verbal communication. This study aims to determine the impact of patient communication software on facilitating communication for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.

Methodology

This clinical trial was conducted with two groups, each comprising 60 alert, mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized in medical universities in Mashhad, from December 2022 to January 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, communication with the patient was established using specially designed software, while in the control group, conventional methods were used to identify patient needs. Data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire and the Ease of Communication Scale. SPSS software (version 20) was utilized for data analysis, employing chi-square, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon and paired t-tests. Cohen's d was also used to evaluate the magnitude of the effect size.

Results

The composition of the groups, including gender and marital status, was comparable, as was their baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, education level, marital status, underlying diseases, airway type, hospital stay length, sedative medication, and mechanical ventilation duration), with no significant differences found (p > 0.05). Before the intervention, there was no difference in communication ease scores between the groups. Post-intervention, the intervention group showed significantly improved communication ease scores compared to the control group (P < 0.001) The Wilcoxon test results indicated a significant reduction in the average communication ease score after the intervention within both the intervention and control groups.

Conclusion

Software designed to assist communication for patients on mechanical ventilation with artificial airways could enhance their ability to communicate their needs more effectively, offering an alternative to methods such as lip-reading, writing, alphabet boards and communication boards.