Financial Toxicity and Its Association With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Partners of Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Financial Toxicity and Breast Cancer: Why Does It Matter, Who Is at Risk, and How Do We Intervene?

Financial toxicity, or the financial burden patients experience because of medical costs, can lead to negative patient effects including lower quality of life, compromised clinical care, and worse health outcomes. People with cancer and survivors are more likely to have financial toxicity than those without cancer, and patients with breast cancer are uniquely at risk. Patients with breast cancer often require multimodal treatment (surgery, radiation, and/or systemic therapy) and adjuvant hormonal therapy can continue for years after primary treatment. With improved disease outcomes, patients with breast cancer have prolonged survivorship often lasting decades but may carry chronic toxicities from treatment; both ongoing treatment of metastatic disease and long-term surveillance include continued tests, imaging, and medical visits that add to the cumulative burden on patients and their families. Additionally, breast cancer predominately affects women, who are more likely to have dual caregiver responsibilities, and increasingly is diagnosed in younger patients, who may have fertility preservation expenses and are more likely to experience education and/or employment disruption. When faced with high costs, patients may face difficult decisions regarding what sacrifices they are willing to endure to receive care. Interventions designed to reduce financial toxicity are moving out of the pilot phase, and ongoing randomized trials are expected to provide evidence into the effectiveness of financial navigation programs. Further work to address financial toxicity in breast cancer at the patient-provider, institutional, and governmental levels is needed for comprehensively better financial outcomes and quality of life.

Long-term Financial Toxicity after CAR T-cell Therapy among Patients in Remission and Their Caregivers

BACKGROUND

The long-term financial toxicity for patients who received Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and their caregivers remains under-explored.

AIMS

The aim of this research is to describe the financial toxicity of patients who are in remission one to five years after receiving CAR T-cell therapy and their caregivers and explore associations between social determinants of health (SDoH), clinical factors, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with financial toxicity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included adults who had received CAR T-cell therapy for a hematologic malignancy and their current or former informal caregivers. Patients and caregivers completed measures of financial toxicity, HRQoL, and a demographic survey, while patients also completed cognitive function and symptom burden measures. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used in this exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients and 31 caregivers study participants. Financial toxicity was relatively low, 25% of patients reported mild to moderate and 18% of caregivers reported mild to severe financial toxicity. Patient financial toxicity was significantly associated with patient income, HRQoL domains, the mental HRQoL summary score, and symptom burden. Caregiver financial toxicity was significantly associated with caregiver age, employment status, HRQoL domains, and the mental HRQoL summary score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and caregivers reported low levels of financial toxicity in the present study: A majority of patients (75%) and caregivers (81%) experienced zero to minimal financial toxicity. Certain patients and caregivers at higher risk for financial toxicity may benefit from targeted interventions coupled with supportive care to address other HRQoL needs.

The experience of subjective financial distress on cancer patients in China: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

To explore the experience of Chinese cancer patients with SFD (Subjective Financial Distress), and add new evidence to studies on the SFD of cancer.

METHODS

Cancer patients and caregivers hospitalized in the oncology department of a Grade A hospital in Jiangsu Province from August 2022 to October 2022 were recruited as participants for semi-structured interviews using purposeful sampling and the maximum variation principle. The themes were extracted using Colaizzi's phenomenological data analysis method.

RESULTS

The interview involved 24 participants who qualified, comprising 15 patients and 9 caregivers. A total of 3 themes and 9 sub-themes were extracted from interviews: (1) financial risk perception (increasing objective financial burden, decreasing financial accessibility); (2) coping behaviors (changes in daily consumption patterns, changes in work status, changes in treatment plans, and seeking support); (3) negative psychological response (personal dimension, family dimension, and social dimension).

CONCLUSION

SFD is widely present in Chinese cancer families and is being dealt with passively, which adversely affects the lives or work of cancer families. Healthcare professionals should pay attention to this phenomenon and conduct early and comprehensive assessments so that future interventions can be implemented to alleviate their SFD.

The association between multimorbidity patterns and physical frailty among middle-aged and older community-dwelling adults: the mediating role of depressive symptoms

Background

This study aimed to investigate the association between multimorbidity and frailty, and the potential mediating role of depressive symptoms in Chinese middle-aged and older community-dwelling adults.

Methods

We selected a total of 5,232 adults with two or more chronic diseases from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) database. Clusters of participants with similar multimorbidity patterns were identified through fuzzy c-means cluster analyses. The cross-sectional association between multimorbidity and frailty was measured through logistic regression analyses. Mediation analysis was applied to examine direct and indirect associations within the counterfactual framework.

Results

At baseline, we identified five multimorbidity patterns. Two of these patterns significantly increased the risk of frailty compared to a non-specific pattern. Depression mediated 35.20% of the effect of multimorbidity on frailty (p = 0.042). Notably, in adults aged 60 years and older, this mediation accounted for 69.84% of the total effect, surpassing the direct impact of multimorbidity on frailty. Among individuals with economic support (0.020, 95% CI: 0.002-0.040), high school education (0.062, 95% CI: 0.007-0.120), and no alcohol consumption (0.024, 95% CI: 0.003-0.050), depression entirely mediated the impact of comorbidities.

Conclusion

This study reveals strong links between specific multimorbidity patterns and physical frailty, with depression significantly mediating these effects, particularly in certain populations. Findings emphasize tailored mental health interventions' necessity in specific groups.

Impact of Surgery on Quality of Life in Families of Children With a Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Systematic Review

ObjectiveTo synthesize research exploring the impact of surgery on quality of life (QoL) in families of children with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).DesignMedline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were systematically searched (from database inception to July 2024) to identify studies exploring QoL in families following surgery for a child with CL/P. Studies were quality appraised using Quality Assessment for Diverse Studies criteria, and a narrative synthesis was undertaken.Main Outcome Measure: Quality of life was explored but specific measures varied across studies.Interventions: Type of surgery being investigated varied across the reviewed studies. This systematic review focussed on both functional and aesthetic surgeries throughout childhood.ResultsOf 157 identified studies, 9 were eligible for inclusion (1 mixed-methods, 1 observational, 1 qualitative, 2 cross-sectional, 4 quasi-experimental). Analysis indicated that QoL was positively impacted by surgery through reduced financial burden, increased sense of mastery/coping, and reduced social impact. However, for some families, new demands (eg, medical/dental appliances, food restrictions), intolerance of uncertainty, and adjustment to changes to their child's appearance were identified following surgery.ConclusionsThere is limited qualitative and quantitative research exploring the impact of a child's cleft surgery on family QoL. The quality of studies included in the review was variable. Supporting families accessing cleft services, especially where QoL and mental health are negatively impacted, is important. Due to the variability within and between the studies, and lack of detail relating to rationale and processes taken, the conclusions from this review are tentative. Further research is needed that addresses methodological and conceptual limitations.

Prospective changes in financial toxicity and health-related quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancer

BACKGROUND

Financial toxicity impacts the treatment choices, daily life, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. We investigated future variations in financial toxicity and HRQoL of patients with gynecologic cancer, evaluated using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire.

METHODS

This multicenter study enrolled patients with gynecologic cancer incurring co-payments for anti-cancer drug treatment for over 2 months. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Patients completed the COST, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-OV28, EORTC-QLQ-CX24, EORTC-QLQ-EN24, and EQ-5D-5L. Paired t-tests were used to compare the initial and follow-up responses. Spearman's rank test was used to examine correlations between COST and HRQoL scores.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients (ovarian, 40; cervical, 18; endometrial, 33) completed the questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. The mean COST score was not significantly different between baseline and end of follow-up (19.56 ± 6.63 and 19.97 ± 7.47, respectively; p = 0.439). Significant correlations were found between COST scores and emotional functioning (r = 0.251, p = 0.023), cognitive functioning (r = 0.254, p = 0.020), and financial difficulties (r = - 0.298, p = 0.006), attitude toward disease/treatment (r = 0.356, p = 0.033), poor body image (r = - 0.362, p = 0.042), back and pelvis pain (r = - 0.451, p = 0.010), and taste change (r = - 0.359, p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

During anticancer drug therapy for gynecologic cancer, the COST score remained stable and did not correlate with overall HRQoL, although higher scores were associated with worse HRQoL for specific functions and symptoms.

Defining and Measuring Financial Toxicity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

PURPOSE

Financial toxicity (FT) of cancer treatment likely affects more patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); however, most of the research on FT comes from high-income countries, which may not apply to LMICs. The causes and consequences of FT in patients with cancer in LMICs remain understudied.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL for FT literature in cancer originating from LMICs from inception until the end of 2023, and documented the different definitions used to define FT in LMICs, and the magnitude of FT documented using those definitions. LMIC was defined using the World Bank Country and Lending Group classification.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies on FT in cancer originating from LMICs have increased in recent years (>75% studies published 2020 onward) and used varying criteria to define FT, broadly categorized into five themes. Majority of the studies defined FT in terms of catastrophic health expenditure (45%) or household impoverishment (10%), while 26% of the studies used the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity tool, developed and validated in US patients, to measure FT in LMIC settings. Twenty-six percent of the studies defined FT in terms of coping mechanisms and 10% in terms of subjective financial burden. The magnitude of FT in patients with cancer was substantial irrespective of the definitions used.

CONCLUSION

This review synthesizes the different definitions of FT for LMICs that have been used in the literature so far. We conclude that the definitions that capture the coping mechanisms or hardships might reflect the magnitude of FT better than absolute dollar values or relative percentages of expenditures. Future studies can use our results to devise locally tailored definitions of FT.

Financial Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer and Their Caregivers

With advances in cancer treatment, long-term survival rates have improved in recent decades, resulting in extended life expectancies for many patients. This progress brings substantial challenges, however, particularly in terms of the costs associated with cancer care. The financial burden, often considerable, poses difficulties for older adults with cancer and their caregivers. Financial toxicity refers to the unintended financial consequences and distress that patients and families incur from cancer and its treatment. The prevalence of financial toxicity varies (some estimates with over half experiencing this challenge), and certain subgroups (eg, race other than White and those with lack of social support) are at greater risk. Although studies focusing on older adults are limited, existing research has shown that financial toxicity is associated with adverse outcomes, including delayed care, poorer physical, social, and psychological well-being, and lower overall quality of life. Moreover, financial toxicity may result in negative caregiver health outcomes, which can in turn affect patient outcomes. These negative caregiver effects may persist into the bereavement phase. Various methods are available to assess financial toxicity, and they consist of three domains: material, psychological, and behavioral. Available interventions focus on identifying those at risk and providing financial counseling, navigation, and literacy, as well as tangible assistance. Although the impact of financial toxicity is increasingly recognized, studies in older adults and their caregivers are lacking. A better understanding of their needs is important to develop interventions aimed at mitigating financial toxicity in older adults with cancer and their caregivers.

Perceived helpfulness of caregiver support resources: Results from a state-wide poll

Objective

Our goal was to identify specific types of services desired by caregivers and determine subgroups most interested in each service type.

Methods

Caregiving questions were added to a state-wide poll conducted in a majority-rural state. Those who identified as caregivers (n = 428) were asked to report on the helpfulness of 6 domains of services. Descriptive analysis and logistic regressions were conducted.

Results

Top resources caregivers identified as potentially helpful included hands-on services (33.9%), help coordinating care from multiple providers (21.5%), help with finances (18.9%), and help managing emotional stress (17.8%). Only 15% indicated no caregiver resources would be helpful. Younger caregivers endorsed several service domains as more helpful than older caregivers; caregivers reporting higher stress were more likely to endorse most domains as helpful.

Conclusion

Data reinforces the overwhelming need to offer caregiver services. Navigation and integrated and tailored service models may be beneficial to help caregivers identify and access appropriate services within healthcare systems.

Innovation

This study uses an innovative approach to identifying needs of caregivers, who are often invisible within the healthcare system. Our findings suggest a paradigm shift is needed to broaden the scope and depth of services offered to caregivers.

A Costly Cure: Understanding and Addressing Financial Toxicity in Cardiovascular Disease Health Care Within the Domain of Social Determinants of Health

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a significant financial burden on patients and families, compounded by both direct and indirect healthcare costs. The increasing prevalence of CVD, coupled with the rising costs of treatment, exacerbates financial toxicity-defined as the economic strain and associated physical, emotional, and behavioral consequences on patients. This review explores the scope of financial toxicity in CVD care, detailing its prevalence, associated risk factors, and the complex interplay with social determinants of health such as income, insurance status, and comorbidities. Drawing from models in oncology, we highlight key interventions aimed at mitigating financial toxicity, including patient counseling, financial navigation, and enhanced patient-physician cost discussions. By adopting these approaches, healthcare providers can better support patients with CVD in managing both their health and financial well-being, potentially improving clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to develop standardized assessment tools for financial toxicity in CVD and implement system-wide mitigation strategies.

A Phenomenological Approach to Financial Toxicity: The-Economic-Side Effect of Cancer

The economic burden of chronic diseases such as cancer could negatively impact patients' health and quality of life. The daily management of the disease results in economic needs that patients often face directly, which may lead to real toxicity, just defined as financial toxicity. This study aims to explore cancer patients' experiences, emotions, opinions, and feelings related to the phenomenon of financial toxicity. A phenomenological qualitative descriptive study was conducted through face-to-face interviews with adult oncological patients. The sample (n = 20) was predominantly composed of females (with a meanly 58 years old) with breast cancer and in chemotherapy treatment. The most relevant topics that emerged from the patients' experiences were the impact on work, the distance from the treatment centre, the economic efforts, the impact on the quality of life, and the healthcare workers' support during the healthcare pathway. From the phenomenological analysis of the interviews, three main themes and seven related subthemes emerged. This study provided a phenomenological interpretation of financial toxicity in adult cancer patients and underlines that this issue involves families or caregivers, too. Financial problems appear relevant for those who experience cancer and should be included in a routine assessment by healthcare professionals.

Decision-making conflicts regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological neoplasms: A descriptive qualitative study

PURPOSE

To explore and understand the conflict in decision-making of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological neoplasms.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study of 16 patients with hematologic neoplasms in the hematology department was conducted between February 2022 and May 2022. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. Face-to-face in-depth personal interviews were performed. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. This descriptive qualitative study adhered to the COREQ checklist.

RESULTS

All patients indicated difficulties in making decisions regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Five themes were identified: (1) weighing the pros and cons of HSCT, (2) financial burden versus desire for rebirth, (3) treatment urgency versus being unprepared, (4) saving oneself versus damaging loved ones, and (5) family companionship versus emotional isolation. These themes reflect the contradictions, entanglements, and realistic conflicts in decision-making regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with hematological neoplasms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified multiple conflicts of decision-making in patients with hematologic neoplasms regarding decisions on hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. Healthcare workers should provide patients with disease knowledge, doctor-patient and intra-family communication, and access to financial support in order to resolve their conflicts and ultimately help them make the decision that is most optimum for them.

The impact of negative COVID-19 experiences on cancer survivors' health-related quality of life and psychological distress: a moderated mediation model

Introduction

Cancer survivors experienced poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and greater psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic than those without cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms that may explain how negative experiences during the pandemic are associated with distress and HRQoL remain unknown. We examined whether psychosocial risk factors (i.e., healthcare disruption, disruption to daily activities and social interaction [DDASI], and financial hardship) mediated the relationship between negative COVID-19-related experiences and cancer survivors' HRQoL and psychological distress (i.e., depressive symptoms, and anxiety) and whether the mediating effects were moderated by psychosocial protective factors (i.e., stress management ability and social support).

Methods

A total of 9,651 cancer survivors completed a questionnaire assessing negative COVID-19-related experiences, psychosocial and practical experiences, and HRQoL. Conditional process analysis was used to evaluate the proposed moderated mediation models.

Results

Participants had a mean age of 63.8 years (SD = 12.3) and were mostly non-Hispanic White (82.3%). DDASI and financial hardship mediated the relationship between negative COVID-19-related experiences and cancer survivor's HRQoL and psychological distress. Stress management ability buffered the indirect effect of DDASI on cancer survivors' HRQoL and psychological distress. Social support buffered the indirect effect of financial hardship on HRQoL and depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Financial resources and social interactions may buffer negative effects of major disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should assess the longitudinal impact of these associations.

Long-term patient-reported values following cancer surgery: A global survey study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the long-term quality of life (QOL) and priorities of an international cohort of cancer surgery survivors.

METHODS

Patients were surveyed through online support groups. We utilized the Short Form-12 questionnaire to evaluate QOL and a novel survey to assess the relative importance of longevity, experience, and costs.

RESULTS

A total of 592 patients from six continents responded. They were 58 ± 12 years old, 70% female, and 92% White. Patients averaged 37 months from their initial cancer diagnosis, with a maximum survivorship of 46 years. Across 17 disease sites, respondents generally ranked longevity, functional independence, and emotional well-being most important, while treatment experience and costs were ranked least important (W = 33.6%, p < 0.001). However, a subset of respondents ranked costs as significantly important. There were no differences in QOL based on demographics, except patients with higher education and income reported better QOL scores. Despite improvements in QOL throughout survivorship, both physical-QOL (41.1 ± 11.1 at 1 year vs. 42.3 ± 12.6 at 5 years, p = 0.511) and mental-QOL (41.3 ± 13.4 at 1 year vs. 44.6 ± 13.9 at 5 years, p = 0.039) remained below that of the general population (50 ± 10; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors experience enduring physical and mental impairment throughout survivorship. Future efforts should aim to provide sustained support across varied socioeconomic groups, ensuring equitable care and enhancement of QOL postcancer treatment.

Hit it hard: qualitative patient perspectives on the optimisation of immune checkpoint inhibition

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of many cancers, including melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Randomised trials are evaluating outcomes from reduced ICI treatment schedules with the aim of improving quality of life, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to provide insight into patient and carer's perspectives of these trials.

METHODS

Seven focus groups were conducted with 31 people with stage IV melanoma, RCC, or caregivers for people receiving ICI. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes were generated: 1) "Treatment and clinic visits provide reassurance": reducing hospital visits may not improve quality of life. 2) "Assessment of personal risk versus benefit": the decision to participate in an ICI optimisation trial is influenced by treatment response, experience of toxicity and perceived logistical benefits based on the individual's circumstances. 3) "Pre-existing experience and beliefs about how treatment and trials work", including the belief that more treatment is better, influence views around ICI optimisation trials.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insight into recruitment challenges and recommends strategies to enhance recruitment for ongoing ICI optimisation trials. These findings will influence the design of future ICI optimisation trials ensuring they are acceptable to patients.

Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Financial Toxicity After Pancreatectomy and Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Financial toxicity (FT) refers to the adverse impact of cancer treatment costs on patients' experiences, potentially leading to poor adherence to treatment and outcomes. However, the prevalence of FT among patients undergoing major upper gastrointestinal cancer operations, as well as factors associated with FT, remain unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study by sending the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) survey and Surgery-Q (a survey specifically developed for this study) to patients who underwent gastrectomy or pancreatectomy for malignant disease at our institution in 2019-2021.

RESULTS

We sent the surveys to 627 patients and received responses from 101 (16%) patients. The FT prevalence (COST score <26) was 48 (48%). Patients likely to experience FT were younger than 50 years of age, of non-White race, earned an annual income <$75,000, and had credit scores <740 (all p < 0.05). Additionally, longer hospital stay (p = 0.041), extended time off work for surgery (p = 0.011), and extended time off work for caregivers (p = 0.005) were associated with FT. Procedure type was not associated with FT; however, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) had a lower FT probability (p = 0.042). In a multivariable analysis, age <50 years (p = 0.031) and credit score <740 (p < 0.001) were associated with high FT risk, while MIS was associated with low FT risk (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer have a major risk of FT. In addition to predicting the FT risk before surgery, facilitating quicker functional recovery with the appropriate use of MIS is considered important to reducing the FT risk.

Cancer diagnosis and treatment in working-age adults: Implications for employment, health insurance coverage, and financial hardship in the United States

The rising costs of cancer care and subsequent medical financial hardship for cancer survivors and families are well documented in the United States. Less attention has been paid to employment disruptions and loss of household income after a cancer diagnosis and during treatment, potentially resulting in lasting financial hardship, particularly for working-age adults not yet age-eligible for Medicare coverage and their families. In this article, the authors use a composite patient case to illustrate the adverse consequences of cancer diagnosis and treatment for employment, health insurance coverage, household income, and other aspects of financial hardship. They summarize existing research and provide nationally representative estimates of multiple aspects of financial hardship and health insurance coverage, benefit design, and employee benefits, such as paid sick leave, among working-age adults with a history of cancer and compare them with estimates among working-age adults without a history of cancer from the most recently available years of the National Health Interview Survey (2019-2021). Then, the authors identify opportunities for addressing employment and health insurance coverage challenges at multiple levels, including federal, state, and local policies; employers; cancer care delivery organizations; and nonprofit organizations. These efforts, when informed by research to identify best practices, can potentially help mitigate the financial hardship associated with cancer.

Validation of the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) in Vietnamese patients with cancer

INTRODUCTION

The COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) has proven to be a reliable tool for quantifying the impact of financial toxicity (FT) in patients with cancer in clinical and public health settings. However, the COST has not yet been validated in Vietnam. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate its reliability and validity among Vietnamese patients with cancer.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 300 patients with cancer aged 27-95 years (mean: 58.5±11.2) in a tertiary hospital. The COST was translated into Vietnamese and English and adjusted to suit the local culture. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients. The construct and convergent validities were also assessed.

RESULTS

The COST demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.913; McDonald's omega = 0.915). The exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors that explained 64.9% of the variance. The adjusted fit indices indicated a good fit of the model (χ2 (39) = 67.78, p = 0.003; standardized root mean squared residual = 0.042; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.971; comparative fit index = 0.979; root mean square error of approximation = 0.061, 90% confidence interval = 0.035-0084). Higher COST scores were significantly correlated with higher health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L utility score: r = 0.21, p = 0.002; EQ VAS: r = 0.28, p < 0.001). Multivariate quantile regression analysis revealed that female sex, rural residence, and unstable job/unemployment were associated with lower COST scores. There was no statistically significant difference in other factors, including clinical factors (types of cancer, staging, and treatment modalities).

CONCLUSIONS

The COST is reliable and valid, making it suitable for assessing FT severity in Vietnamese patients with cancer.

Mixed-Methods Study on the Responsiveness of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity Among People With Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

Financial toxicity is a contributor to the psychosocial burden of cancer care. There is no consensus measure of financial toxicity; however, recent studies have adopted the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). Despite its growing popularity, data on the responsiveness to change of the COST instrument are lacking. To address this gap in the literature, we performed a sequential mixed-methods study of people with multiple myeloma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the quantitative phase of the study, we collected COST scores at two time points approximately 8 weeks apart from 72 patients. In the qualitative phase, we conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of 12 patients who reported the largest changes in scores. The qualitative data were analyzed using a deductive coding scheme developed using the Framework Method in the context of a commonly cited conceptual model of financial toxicity.

RESULTS

The median absolute change in COST scores was four points (IQR, 2-6). Only 13% of the sample had the same COST scores at both assessments; 38% had an improved score and 50% had a worsened score. Only, seven of the 12 patients (58%) interviewed reported changes to one or more of the constructs in the conceptual model of financial toxicity. Most commonly, changes to out-of-pocket medical costs were reported (5/12). Changes to nonmedical expenses (n = 2) and subjective financial distress without changes to objective financial burden (n = 2) were also reported.

CONCLUSION

Additional research is needed to explicate changes in COST scores over time.

The invisible scars: Unseen financial complications worsen every aspect of long-term health in trauma survivors

BACKGROUND

Trauma survivors are susceptible to experiencing financial toxicity (FT). Studies have shown the negative impact of FT on chronic illness outcomes. However, there is a notable lack of data on FT in the context of trauma. We aimed to better understand prevalence, risk factors, and impact of FT on trauma long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Adult trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥9 treated at Level I trauma centers were interviewed 6 months to 14 months after discharge. Financial toxicity was considered positive if patients reported any of the following due to the injury: income loss, lack of care, newly applied/qualified for governmental assistance, new financial problems, or work loss. The Impact of FT on Patient Reported Outcome Measure Index System (PROMIS) health domains was investigated.

RESULTS

Of 577 total patients, 44% (254/567) suffered some form of FT. In the adjusted model, older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.2-0.81) and stronger social support networks (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.74) were protective against FT. In contrast, having two or more comorbidities (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.01-3.28), lower education levels (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 95%, 1.26-3.03), and injury mechanisms, including road accidents (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.51-4.77) and intentional injuries (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.44-12.86) were associated with higher toxicity. No significant relationship was found with ISS, sex, or single-family household. Patients with FT had worse outcomes across all domains of health. There was a negative linear relationship between the severity of FT and worse mental and physical health scores.

CONCLUSION

Financial toxicity is associated with long-term outcomes. Incorporating FT risk assessment into recovery care planning may help to identify patients most in need of mitigative interventions across the trauma care continuum to improve trauma recovery. Further investigations to better understand, define, and address FT in trauma care are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Evaluation of a Conference on Cancer-Related Financial and Legal Issues: A Potential Resource to Counter Financial Toxicity

This study describes the conception, development, and growth of the Triage Cancer Conference hosted by Triage Cancer, a national nonprofit organization providing free legal and financial education to the cancer community. We conducted a retrospective analysis of post-conference participant surveys. Descriptive statistics were calculated for participant demographics, and acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness were evaluated. From 2016-2021, 1239 participants attended the conference and completed post-conference surveys. Participants included social workers (33%), nurses (30%), and cancer patients/survivors (21%), with representation from over 48 states. Among those who reported race, 16% were Black, and 7% were Hispanic. For acceptability, more than 90% of participants felt that the conference content, instructors, and format were suitable and useful. For feasibility, more than 90% of participants felt that the material was useful, with 93-96% reporting that they were likely to share the information and 98% reporting that they would attend another triage cancer event. Appropriateness was also high, with >80-90% reporting that the sessions met the pre-defined objectives. Triage Cancer fills an important gap in mitigating financial toxicity, and formal evaluation of these programs allows us to build evidence of the role and impact of these existing resources. Future research should focus on adding validated patient-reported outcomes, longer-term follow-up, and ensuring inclusion and evaluation of outcome metrics among vulnerable populations.