Identification of Palliative Care Needs and Mental Health Outcomes Among Family Members of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury

End-of-Life Symptoms in Adult Patients With Stroke in the Last Two Years of Life: An Integrative Review

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of death globally, yet End-of-Life (EOL) symptoms and their management in these patients are not well understood.

PURPOSE

This integrative review aims to critique and synthesize research on EOL symptoms and symptom management in adult patients with stroke in the last 2 years of life in all settings.

METHODS

The Whittemore and Knafl integrative review methodology guided this review. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were used for the literature search. Included studies were published in English and quantitatively examined symptoms and symptom management. Quality appraisal was guided by the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) assessment tool.

RESULTS

Seven studies, all rated weak, were included in this review. A total of 2175 adult patients from six countries were represented. Results are classified into three main themes: EOL symptom experience, symptom assessment, and symptom management. Commonly reported EOL symptoms among adults with stroke include both stroke-specific (dysphagia, dysarthria) and non-specific symptoms (pain, dyspnea, constipation, and psychological distress). However, communication difficulties and the infrequent use of standardized tools for symptom assessment limit what is known about the EOL symptom experience. Although the relief of pain is generally well-documented, dyspnea and anxiety are much more poorly controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for better assessment and management of EOL symptoms in patients with stroke. Established palliative and EOL care guidelines need to be incorporated into clinical practice to ensure access to high-quality care.

Mobile Application-Based Communication Facilitation Platform for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Unmet and racially disparate palliative care needs are common in intensive care unit (ICU) settings.

Objective

To test the effect of a primary palliative care intervention vs usual care control both overall and by family member race.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted at 6 adult medical and surgical ICUs in 2 academic and community hospitals in North Carolina between April 2019 and May 2022 with physician-level randomization and sequential clusters of 2 Black patient-family member dyads and 2 White patient-family member dyads enrolled under each physician. Eligible participants included consecutive patients receiving mechanical ventilation, their family members, and their attending ICU physicians. Data analysis was conducted from June 2022 to May 2023.

Intervention

A mobile application (ICUconnect) that displayed family-reported needs over time and provided ICU attending physicians with automated timeline-driven communication advice on how to address individual needs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was change in the family-reported Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST; range 0-130, with higher scores reflecting greater need) score between study days 1 and 3. Secondary outcomes included family-reported quality of communication and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder at 3 months.

Results

A total of 111 (51% of those approached) family members (mean [SD] age, 51 [15] years; 96 women [86%]; 15 men [14%]; 47 Black family members [42%]; 64 White family members [58%]) and 111 patients (mean [SD] age, 55 [16] years; 66 male patients [59%]; 45 Black patients [41%]; 65 White patients [59%]; 1 American Indian or Alaska Native patient [1%]) were enrolled under 37 physicians randomized to intervention (19 physicians and 55 patient-family member dyads) or control (18 physicians and 56 patient-family member dyads). Compared with control, there was greater improvement in NEST scores among intervention recipients between baseline and both day 3 (estimated mean difference, -6.6 points; 95% CI, -11.9 to -1.3 points; P = .01) and day 7 (estimated mean difference, -5.4 points; 95% CI, -10.7 to 0.0 points; P = .05). There were no treatment group differences at 3 months in psychological distress symptoms. White family members experienced a greater reduction in NEST scores compared with Black family members at day 3 (estimated mean difference, -12.5 points; 95% CI, -18.9 to -6.1 points; P < .001 vs estimated mean difference, -0.3 points; 95% CI, -9.3 to 8.8 points; P = .96) and day 7 (estimated mean difference, -9.5 points; 95% CI, -16.1 to -3.0 points; P = .005 vs estimated mean difference, -1.4 points; 95% CI, -10.7 to 7.8; P = .76).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study of ICU patients and family members, a primary palliative care intervention using a mobile application reduced unmet palliative care needs compared with usual care without an effect on psychological distress symptoms at 3 months; there was a greater intervention effect among White family members compared with Black family members. These findings suggest that a mobile application-based intervention is a promising primary palliative care intervention for ICU clinicians that directly addresses the limited supply of palliative care specialists.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03506438.