Comparative Effectiveness of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant vs Fingolimod, Natalizumab, and Ocrelizumab in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Healthcare utilization and costs associated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Norwegian patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients experience long-term deterioration of neurological function, reduced quality of life, long-lasting treatment cycles, and an increased risk of early workability loss imposing an economic burden to society. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has shown promising treatment effects for relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). This study employs a micro-costing approach to estimate healthcare utilization and costs associated with AHSCT in Norwegian RRMS patients. Patient-level data were extracted from medical journals of 30 RRMS patients receiving AHSCT treatment at Haukeland University Hospital in the period from January 2015 to January 2018. The time horizon for the analysis was from the pretransplant screening until one year after AHSCT. A correlation was found between patient body weight and total healthcare cost. The average total healthcare cost of AHSCT for RRMS patients was estimated to EUR 66 304 (95% CI: EUR 63 598 - EUR 69 010) including costs associated with the pre-AHSCT period, AHSCT treatment phases and one-year follow-up. The majority of the costs, EUR 64 329, occurred during the treatment phase and within the first 100 days after AHSCT. The results indicate that long-term healthcare cost savings may be achieved using AHSCT in selected patients with aggressive RRMS. This is due to the high costs of most used disease modifying treatments. Further research including long-term clinical data is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of this treatment.

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in two patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by compartmentalized smoldering neuroinflammation caused by the proliferation of immune cells residing in the central nervous system (CNS), including B cells. Although inflammatory activity can be prevented by immunomodulatory therapies during early disease, such therapies typically fail to halt disease progression. CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have revolutionized the field of hematologic malignancies. Although generally considered efficacious, serious adverse events associated with CAR-T cell therapies such as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) have been observed. Successful use of CD19 CAR-T cells in rheumatic diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus and neuroimmunological diseases like myasthenia gravis have recently been observed, suggesting possible application in other autoimmune diseases.

METHODS

Here, we report the first individual treatment with a fully human CD19 CAR-T cell therapy (KYV-101) in two patients with progressive MS.

FINDINGS

CD19 CAR-T cell administration resulted in acceptable safety profiles for both patients. No ICANS was observed despite detection of CD19 CAR-T cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. In case 1, intrathecal antibody production in the cerebrospinal fluid decreased notably after CAR-T cell infusion and was sustained through day 64.

CONCLUSIONS

CD19 CAR-T cell administration in progressive MS resulted in an acceptable safety profile. CAR-T cell presence and expansion were observed in the cerebrospinal fluid without clinical signs of neurotoxicity, which, along with intrathecal antibody reduction, indicates expansion-dependent effects of CAR-T cells on CD19+ target cells in the CNS. Larger clinical studies assessing CD19 CAR-T cells in MS are warranted.

FUNDING

Both individual treatments as well the generated data were not based on external funding.

Disease modifying therapy in the treatment of tumefactive multiple sclerosis: A retrospective cohort study

Tumefactive multiple sclerosis (TMS) is characterized by large demyelinating brain lesions. This was a retrospective cohort study of 67 patients with TMS between January 2015-2023, examining different disease modifying therapy impact on expanded disability scale score change at follow-up. Median age was 36 with a female predominance. Mean EDSS was 3.3 ± 2.3 at TMS onset, 2.1 ± 1.9 at year one, and 2.1 ± 1.9 at last follow-up. A multilinear regression model found higher presentation EDSS and post-diagnosis non-B-cell high efficacy therapies were each independently associated with higher EDSS at last follow up. Further research is needed to determine the value of B-cell therapy in TMS.

Cost and effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a highly effective one-off treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS), potentially representing an optimal front-loading strategy for costs.

OBJECTIVE

Exploring cost/effectiveness of AHSCT and high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments (HE-DMTs) in RR-MS, estimating costs at our centre in Italy, where National Health Service (NHS) provides universal health coverage.

METHODS

Costs (including drugs, inpatient/outpatient management) for treatment with AHSCT and HE-DMTs were calculated as NHS expenditures over 2- and 5-year periods. Cost-effectiveness for each treatment was estimated as "cost needed to treat" (CNT), i.e. expense to prevent relapses, progression, or disease activity (NEDA) in one patient over n-years, retrieving outcomes from published studies.

RESULTS

Costs of AHSCT and HE-DMTs were similar over 2 years, whereas AHSCT was cheaper than most HE-DMTs over 5 years (€46 600 vs €93 800, respectively). When estimating cost-effectiveness of treatments, over 2 years, mean CNT of HE-DMTs for NEDA was twofold that of AHSCT, whereas it was similar for relapses and disability. Differences in CNT were remarkable over 5 years, especially for NEDA, being mean CNT of HE-DMTs €382 800 vs €74 900 for AHSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

AHSCT may be highly cost-effective in selected aggressive RR-MS. Besides priceless benefits for treated individuals, cost-savings generated by AHSCT may contribute to improving healthcare assistance at a population level.

Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis: A 2023 Review of Published Studies

This comprehensive literature review underscores the potential of stem cell transplantation (SCT) as a therapeutic intervention for multiple sclerosis (MS). By amalgamating evidence from various sources, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational, retrospective, and comparative studies, this review offers a holistic understanding of SCT's effectiveness, safety, and feasibility in diverse contexts of MS management. SCT has shown promise in mitigating disease activity and progression, particularly in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). RCTs like the high dose immunoablation and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in MS (ASTIMS) versus mitoxantrone therapy in severe multiple sclerosis and multiple sclerosis international stem cell transplant (MIST) trials reveal SCT's capacity to reduce new lesion occurrences and inflammatory activity. However, variability exists in disability score improvements among these studies. Observational and retrospective investigations further affirm SCT's potential, highlighting decreased relapse rates, enhanced expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores, and a noteworthy proportion of patients achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). The initial literature search using all of the search items produced a total of 3,636 articles. After title, abstract, and article type screening and article retrieving, 147 articles were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion criteria. At the end of the literature search, 37 articles met the eligibility criteria. They were included in our review according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) present lower progression and relapse rates, suppression of inflammatory activity, and a greater reduction in T2 lesions on MRI than those treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In summary, while SCT presents promise as a therapeutic option for MS, its deployment should be tailored to individual patient characteristics, disease stages, and responses.

Should autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation be offered as a first-line disease modifying therapy to patients with multiple sclerosis?

In multiple sclerosis (MS), progression independent of new focal inflammation may commence shortly after disease onset, and it is increasingly revealed that the risk of disability accrual is reduced by early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE-DMTs). People with aggressive MS may therefore benefit from early treatment with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), a procedure inducing maximal immunosuppression followed by immune reconstitution, demonstrated to be superior to DMTs in one randomized clinical trial. However, in current practice prior failure to HE-DMTs is typically required to establish the indication for AHSCT. In the present article, the available evidence on the potential role of AHSCT as first-line treatment in aggressive MS and the rationale for its early use will be summarized. Proposed definitions of aggressive MS that could help identifying MS patients eligible for early treatment with AHSCT will also be discussed.