1
|
Duarte‐Bateman D, Shen A, Bullock T, Sadeghi P, Escandón JM, Dedkova E, Gastman BR. Best practices in surgical and nonsurgical management of head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma: An update. Mol Carcinog 2023; 62:101-112. [PMID: 36367533 PMCID: PMC10098483 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Controversy exists regarding optimal management of MCC as high-quality randomized studies and clinical trials are limited, and physicians are bound to interpret highly heterogeneous, retrospective literature in their clinical practice. Furthermore, the rising incidence and notably poor prognosis of MCC urges the establishment of best practices for optimal management of the primary tumor and its metastases. Herein, we summarized the relevant evidence and provided an algorithm for decision-making in MCC management based on the latest 2021 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Additionally, we report current active MCC clinical trials in the United States. The initial management of MCC is dependent upon the pathology of the primary tumor and presence of metastatic disease. Patients with no clinical evidence of regional lymph node involvement generally require sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) while clinically node-positive patients should undergo fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core biopsy and full imaging workup. If SLNB or FNA/core biopsy are positive, a multidisciplinary team should be assembled to discuss if additional node dissection or adjuvant therapy is necessary. Wide local excision is optimal for primary tumor management and SLNB remains the preferred staging and predictive tool in MCC. The management of MCC has progressively improved in the last decade, particularly due to the establishment of immunotherapy as a new treatment option in advanced MCC. Ongoing trials and prospective studies are needed to further establish the best practices for MCC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Duarte‐Bateman
- Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Department of Plastic SurgeryCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Alan Shen
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Taylor Bullock
- Department of DermatologyCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Payam Sadeghi
- Department of Plastic SurgeryCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Joseph M. Escandón
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Strong Memorial HospitalUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Eliska Dedkova
- Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Brian R. Gastman
- Lerner Research InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Department of Plastic SurgeryCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Femia D, Prinzi N, Anichini A, Mortarini R, Nichetti F, Corti F, Torchio M, Peverelli G, Pagani F, Maurichi A, Mattavelli I, Milione M, Bedini N, Corti A, Di Bartolomeo M, de Braud F, Pusceddu S. Treatment of Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Current Therapeutic Options and Novel Immunotherapy Approaches. Target Oncol 2019; 13:567-582. [PMID: 30073632 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-018-0585-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a very aggressive, rare neuroendocrine tumor of the skin with a high frequency of locoregional recurrence and metastasis, and a high mortality rate. Surgical resection, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and radiotherapy represent the gold standard of treatment in patients with localized disease, while chemotherapy has a significant role in the treatment of advanced disease. However, no definitive evidence on the survival impact of radiotherapy in the advanced stages has been provided to date, and response to chemotherapy remains brief in the majority of cases, indicating an urgent need for alternative approaches. Biological and genome sequencing studies have implicated multiple molecular pathways in MCC, thus leading to the development of new agents that target angiogenic factors, anti-apoptosis molecules, poly-ADP ribose polymerase, intracellular signal proteins such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, and peptide receptors such as somatostatin receptors. More recently, immunotherapy agents such as avelumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab, which act by blocking the programmed cell-death (PD)-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint, have shown promising results, especially in the advanced setting, and should now be considered standard of care for metastatic MCC. Current research is focusing on developing new immunotherapeutic strategies, identifying predictive biomarker to aid in the selection of patients responsive to immunotherapy, and defining combination approaches to increase efficacy in refractory patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Femia
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Natalie Prinzi
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Anichini
- Department of Research, Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Mortarini
- Department of Research, Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Nichetti
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Corti
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Torchio
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Peverelli
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Pagani
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Maurichi
- Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mattavelli
- Melanoma and Sarcoma Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Milione
- 1st Pathology Division, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | - Nice Bedini
- Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Pusceddu
- Department of Medical Oncology Unit-1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano and ENETS Center of Excellence, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cassler NM, Merrill D, Bichakjian CK, Brownell I. Merkel Cell Carcinoma Therapeutic Update. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2017; 17:36. [PMID: 27262710 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-016-0409-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin. Early-stage disease can be cured with surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important staging tool, as a microscopic MCC is frequently identified. Adjuvant RT to the primary excision site and regional lymph node bed may improve locoregional control. However, newer studies confirm that patients with biopsy-negative sentinel lymph nodes may not benefit from regional RT. Advanced MCC currently lacks a highly effective treatment as responses to chemotherapy are not durable. Recent work suggests that immunotherapy targeting the programmed cell death receptor 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint holds great promise in treating advanced MCC and may provide durable responses in a portion of patients. At the same time, high-throughput sequencing studies have demonstrated significant differences in the mutational profiles of tumors with and without the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV). An important secondary endpoint in the ongoing immunotherapy trials for MCC will be determining if there is a response difference between the virus-positive MCC tumors that typically lack a large mutational burden and the virus-negative tumors that have a large number of somatic mutations and predicted tumor neoantigens. Interestingly, sequencing studies have failed to identify a highly recurrent activated driver pathway in the majority of MCC tumors. This may explain why targeted therapies can demonstrate exceptional responses in case reports but fail when treating all comers with MCC. Ultimately, a precision medicine approach may be more appropriate for treating MCC, where identified driver mutations are used to direct targeted therapies. At a minimum, stratifying patients in future clinical trials based on tumor viral status should be considered as virus-negative tumors are more likely to harbor activating driver mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Cassler
- Department of Dermatology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dean Merrill
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Isaac Brownell
- Dermatology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1908, USA.
| |
Collapse
|