Performance of a novel eight-color flow cytometry panel for measurable residual disease assessment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important prognostic indicator of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Different flow cytometric panels have been developed for the MRD assessment of CLL in Western countries; however, the application of these panels in China remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

Owing to the requirements for high accuracy, reproducibility, and comparability of MRD assessment in China, we investigated the performance of a flow cytometric approach (CD45-ROR1 panel) to assess MRD in patients with CLL. The European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC) eight-color panel was used as the "gold standard."

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rate of the CD45-ROR1 panel in the MRD assessment of CLL were 100% (87/87), 88.5% (23/26), and 97.3% (110/113), respectively. Two of the three inconsistent samples were further verified using next-generation sequencing. In addition, the MRD results obtained from the CD45-ROR1 panel were positively associated with the ERIC eight-color panel results for MRD assessment (R = 0.98, p < 0.0001). MRD detection at low levels (≤1.0%) demonstrated a smaller difference between the two methods (bias, -0.11; 95% CI, -0.90 to 0.68) than that at high levels (>1%). In the reproducibility assessment, the bias was smaller at three data points (within 24, 48, and 72 h) in the CD45-ROR1 panel than in the ERIC eight-color panel. Moreover, MRD levels detected using the CD45-ROR1 panel for the same samples from different laboratories showed a strong statistical correlation (R = 0.99, p < 0.0001) with trivial interlaboratory variation (bias, 0.135; 95% CI, -0.439 to 0.709). In addition, the positivity rate of MRD in the bone marrow samples was higher than that in the peripheral blood samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, this study demonstrated that the CD45-ROR1 panel is a reliable method for MRD assessment of CLL with high sensitivity, reproducibility, and reliability.

First-Line Treatment of Older Patients with CLL: A New Approach in the Chemo-Free Era

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, with or without the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Obinutuzumab, represent the preferred options for the first-line therapy of CLL because they are more effective and may improve quality of life. However, patient inclusion criteria are heterogeneous across trials designed for older patients, and the identification of CLL-specific parameters identifying unfit patients at risk of developing drug-specific adverse events is required to guide treatment choice. Due to inclusion/exclusion criteria in trials, higher discontinuation rates with BTKi were reported in real-world studies, and registry analyses provided useful information on factors predicting earlier discontinuation in a real-world setting. Though targeted agents were shown to be cost-effective treatments in high-income countries, the out-of-pocket expenses may limit accessibility to these drugs, and the overall expenditure for new drugs in CLL is projected to increase substantially, posing an issue for sustainability. This being said, the choice of a finite-duration treatment based on venetoclax-containing regimens or treatment until progression with BTKi is today possible in high-income countries, and the therapy choice drivers are represented by coexisting medical conditions rather than age, patient expectations, logistics, and sustainability.

A CAPTIVATEing Analysis for Higher-Risk CLL

In an exploratory analysis of the phase II CAPTIVATE study, previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with a higher-risk feature of immune globulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) unmutated status, del(17p), and/or TP53 mutation had similar efficacy and safety outcomes compared with patients without a higher-risk feature when treated with fixed-duration ibrutinib and venetoclax. See related article by Allan et al., p. 2593.

Minimal/Measurable Disease Analysis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma by Flow Cytometry

CLL/SLL is the most common leukemia in the western world. The disease is indolent; however, most patients require treatment at some point of the disease course. Outside of allogeneic transplants, the treatment is rarely curative but often controls CLL/SLL manifestations for many years. Several lines of therapy may be used sequentially to prolong clinical remission. Because of the prolonged disease course, CLL/SLL monitoring represents a sizable portion of the workload in a typical flow cytometry laboratory involved in the diagnosis and monitoring of hematopoietic neoplasms. Minimal/measurable disease monitoring of CLL/SLL has emerged as a key component in treatment monitoring and sequencing. In the face of effective therapies, clinical laboratories are tasked with monitoring ever smaller proportions of MRD with high precision and accuracy. With the recent addition of surface antigen-targeting biologics such as antibodies and CAR-T cells, the task has become more complex due to the unavailability of commonly analyzed antigens for flow cytometric analysis. This article details a flow cytometric test developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center that has proven to consistently achieve high sensitivity (<0.01% of nucleated cells) in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, even when CD19 is lost or unavailable for analysis. Moreover, the test helps distinguish between CLL and other CD5-positive B cell neoplasms. The Basic Protocol provides a detailed operational procedure for processing, staining, and cytometric acquisition of samples. The Support Protocol provides typical steps and caveats for MRD data analysis in CLL/SLL and in distinguishing CLL/SLL from other B cell neoplasms and normal CD5-positive B cells. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Processing, staining, and cytometric analysis of bone marrow or peripheral blood cells for MRD analysis of CLL/SLL Support Protocol: Analysis and interpretation of CLL MRD assay.

Measurable residual disease does not preclude prolonged progression-free survival in CLL treated with ibrutinib

E1912 was a randomized phase 3 trial comparing indefinite ibrutinib plus 6 cycles of rituximab (IR) to 6 cycles of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in untreated younger patients with CLL. We describe measurable residual disease (MRD) levels in E1912 over time and correlate them with clinical outcome. Undetectable MRD rates (<1 CLL cell per 104 leukocytes) were 29.1%, 30.3%, 23.4%, and 8.6% at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months for FCR, and significantly lower at 7.9%, 4.2%, and 3.7% at 12, 24, and 36 months for IR, respectively. Undetectable MRD at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in the FCR arm, with hazard ratios (MRD detectable/MRD undetectable) of 4.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89-9.71), 3.91 (95% CI, 1.39-11.03), 14.12 (95% CI, 1.78-111.73), and not estimable (no events among those with undetectable MRD), respectively. In the IR arm, patients with detectable MRD did not have significantly worse PFS compared with those in whom MRD was undetectable; however, PFS was longer in those with MRD levels <10-1 than in those with MRD levels above this threshold. Our observations provide additional support for the use of MRD as a surrogate end point for PFS in patients receiving FCR. In patients on indefinite ibrutinib-based therapy, PFS did not differ significantly by undetectable MRD status, whereas those with MRD <10-1 tended to have longer PFS, although continuation of ibrutinib would very likely be necessary to maintain treatment efficacy.

Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics after Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab Treatment: Extended Off-Treatment Follow-up From the Randomized CLL14 Study

PURPOSE

The CLL14 study has established one-year fixed-duration treatment of venetoclax and obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi) for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. With all patients off treatment for at least three years, we report a detailed analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics and long-term outcome of patients treated in the CLL14 study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of obinutuzumab with 12 cycles of venetoclax or 12 cycles of chlorambucil (Clb-Obi). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included rates of undetectable MRD and overall survival. To analyze MRD kinetics, a population-based growth model with nonlinear mixed effects approach was developed.

RESULTS

Of 432 patients, 216 were assigned to Ven-Obi and 216 to Clb-Obi. Three months after treatment completion, 40% of patients in the Ven-Obi arm (7% in the Clb-Obi arm) had undetectable MRD levels < 10^-6 by next-generation sequencing in peripheral blood. Median MRD doubling time was longer after Ven-Obi than Clb-Obi therapy (median 80 v 69 days). At a median follow-up of 52.4 months, a sustained significant PFS improvement was observed in the Ven-Obi arm compared with Clb-Obi (median not reached v 36.4 months; hazard ratio 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.45; P < .0001). The estimated 4-year PFS rate was 74.0% in the Ven-Obi and 35.4% in the Clb-Obi arm. No difference in overall survival was observed (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.35; P = .49). No new safety signals occurred.

CONCLUSION

Appearance of MRD after Ven-Obi is significantly slower than that after Clb-Obi with more effective MRD reduction. These findings translate into a superior long-term efficacy with the majority of Ven-Obi-treated patients remaining in remission.

Extrinsic interactions in the microenvironment in vivo activate an antiapoptotic multidrug-resistant phenotype in CLL

The Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax has yielded exceptional clinical responses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, de novo resistance can result in failure to achieve negative minimal residual disease and predicts poor treatment outcomes. Consequently, additional proapoptotic drugs, such as inhibitors of Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL, are in development. By profiling antiapoptotic proteins using flow cytometry, we find that leukemic B cells that recently emigrated from the lymph node (CD69+/CXCR4Low) in vivo are enriched for cell clusters simultaneously overexpressing multiple antiapoptotic proteins (Mcl-1High/Bcl-xLHigh/Bcl-2High) in both treated and treatment-naive CLL patients. These cells exhibited antiapoptotic resistance to multiple BH-domain antagonists, including inhibitors of Bcl-2, Mcl-1, and Bcl-xL, when tested as single agents in a flow cytometry-based functional assay. Antiapoptotic multidrug resistance declines ex vivo, consistent with resistance being generated in vivo by extrinsic microenvironmental interactions. Surviving "persister" cells in patients undergoing venetoclax treatment are enriched for CLL cells displaying the functional and molecular properties of microenvironmentally induced multidrug resistance. Overcoming this resistance required simultaneous inhibition of multiple antiapoptotic proteins, with potential for unwanted toxicities. Using a drug screen performed using patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultured in an ex vivo microenvironment model, we identify novel venetoclax drug combinations that induce selective cytotoxicity in multidrug-resistant CLL cells. Thus, we demonstrate that antiapoptotic multidrug-resistant CLL cells exist in patients de novo and show that these cells persist during proapoptotic treatment, such as venetoclax. We validate clinically actionable approaches to selectively deplete this reservoir in patients.

Undetectable minimal residual disease is an independent prognostic factor in splenic marginal zone lymphoma

The role of minimal residual disease (MRD) in splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) has not been well studied. We prospectively designed a study to evaluate undetectable MRD (uMRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry as a prognostic factor. Residual disease level of <0·01% was defined as uMRD. A total of 71 newly diagnosed patients with bone marrow involvement were enrolled and all received rituximab-based therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 98·5% (70/71), with a complete remission (CR) rate of 54·9% (39/71). There were a total of 295 MRD detections in bone marrow and 77·4% patients (55/71) had uMRD. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) [(74·8 ± 6·5)% vs. (31·4 ± 12·6)%, P < 0·001] and 5-year overall survival (OS) [(87·2 ± 5·6)% vs. (68·9 ± 13·4)%, P = 0·035] were significantly higher in uMRD patients than in MRD-positive patients. The 5-year PFS in partial remission (PR) patients with positive MRD was significantly poorer than that of PR patients with uMRD [(21·1 ± 12·9)% vs. (83·3 ± 8·8)%, P = 0·005]. Multivariate prognostic analysis revealed that uMRD was an independent good prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio 0·162, 95% confidence interval 0·041-0·635; P = 0·009). All these results highlight uMRD as an independent prognostic factor in patients with SMZL, especially for patients who only achieve PR.

The Evolving Landscape of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia on Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment

The knowledge of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has progressively deepened during the last forty years. Research activities and clinical studies have been remarkably fruitful in novel findings elucidating multiple aspects of the pathogenesis of the disease, improving CLL diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Whereas the diagnostic criteria for CLL have not substantially changed over time, prognostication has experienced an expansion with the identification of new biological and genetic biomarkers. Thanks to next-generation sequencing (NGS), an unprecedented number of gene mutations were identified with potential prognostic and predictive value in the 2010s, although significant work on their validation is still required before they can be used in a routine clinical setting. In terms of treatment, there has been an impressive explosion of new approaches based on targeted therapies for CLL patients during the last decade. In this current chemotherapy-free era, BCR and BCL2 inhibitors have changed the management of CLL patients and clearly improved their prognosis and quality of life. In this review, we provide an overview of these novel advances, as well as point out questions that should be further addressed to continue improving the outcomes of patients.

CD43 in the malignant flow cytometry laboratory in 2020

Objectives: CD43 can be useful in routine flow cytometry. We conducted a systematic review aiming to describe when CD43 is used by flow cytometry in malignant hematology and to determine its value in these settings. Methods: Systematic review of MEDLINE (search 'CD43' AND 'flow cytometry,' starting in 2010). Results: Twenty-one of 103 entries retrieved were included in this systematic review. CD43 is used in three settings: 1) in the classification of mature B cell lymphoproliferative disorders, 2) as part of a strategy to quantify residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and 3) to help classify CD10-positive B cell populations. In this section, the published data is summarized, the clinical usefulness in each of these settings is evaluated and illustrative cases are shown. Conclusion: CD43 has a growing role in the diagnosis and management of B cell malignancies; it has become essential for the classification of B cell lymphoproliferative disorders and may be of help in the differential diagnosis of CD10-positive lymphomas by FC. It is also required for optimal quantification of CLL residual disease, which will soon be used to guide therapeutic decisions.

Incorporating molecular biomarkers into the continuum of care in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a mature B-cell malignancy characterized by marked heterogeneity. Discoveries in disease biology over the past two decades have helped explain clinical variability and heralded the arrival of the targeted therapy era. In this article, we review improvements in risk stratification which have coincided with this progress, including individual biomarkers and their incorporation into prognostic models. Amidst an ever-expanding list of biomarkers, we seek to bring focus to the essential tests to improve patient care and counseling at particular times in the disease course, beginning with prognosis at diagnosis. The majority of patients do not require treatment at the time of diagnosis, making time-to-first-treatment a key initial prognostic concern. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers are then considered at subsequent major junctures, including at the time of treatment initiation, while on therapy, and at the time of relapse on novel agents.

Prognostic value of high-sensitivity measurable residual disease assessment after front-line chemoimmunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status is widely adopted in clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Findings from FILO group trials (CLL2007FMP, CLL2007SA, CLL2010FMP) enabled investigation of the prognostic value of high-sensitivity (0.7 × 10^-5) MRD assessment using flow cytometry, in blood (N = 401) and bone marrow (N = 339), after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR)-based chemoimmunotherapy in a homogeneous population with long follow-up (median 49.5 months). Addition of low-level positive MRD < 0.01% to MRD ≥ 0.01% increased the proportion of cases with positive MRD in blood by 39% and in bone marrow by 27%. Compared to low-level positive MRD < 0.01%, undetectable MRD was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) when using blood (72.2 versus 42.7 months; hazard ratio 0.40, p = 0.0003), but not when using bone marrow. Upon further stratification, positive blood MRD at any level, compared to undetectable blood MRD, was associated with shorter PFS irrespective of clinical complete or partial remission, and a lower 5-year PFS rate irrespective of IGHV-mutated or -unmutated status (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, high-sensitivity (0.0007%) MRD assessment in blood yielded additional prognostic information beyond the current standard sensitivity (0.01%). Our approach provides a model for future determination of the optimal MRD investigative strategy for any regimen.

14-Color single tube for flow cytometric characterization of CD5+ B-LPDs and high sensitivity automated minimal residual disease quantitation of CLL/SLL

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of CLL/SLL relies on flow cytometric immunophenotyping. Increasing emphasis is being placed on precise detection of the minimal residual disease. Following antigen recommendations of ERIC and ESCCA's Harmonization Project, we validated a 14-color assay for the characterization CD5+ lymphoproliferative neoplasms and CLL MRD with a sensitivity of at least 10^-4 .

METHODS

The assay was designed based on ERIC/ESCCA recommended antigens with the addition of CD40 for alternate gating when CD19 expression is reduced. Lower limit of quantitation/lower limit of detection, assay procedural precision, linearity, and limit of blank were established. Then, 52 CD5+ B-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasms (41 CLL/11 non-CLL) and 29 normal samples were used for parallel evaluation. Automated cluster identification and quantitation of CLL clones in MRD setting was performed using Barned-Hutt SNE. Separation analysis between CLL and non-CLL phenotypes was performed by PCA and bh-SNE.

RESULTS

Separation ratios for each antigen exceeded ERIC/ESCCA guidelines. Precision was <20% at LLOQ (0.01%). The limit of blank was <10/500,000 cells. Concordance between the 14-color and legacy assay (Deming regression y = 1.01x, r²  = .99) was seen. All 20 samples with MRD levels 0.5%-0.006% (median 0.04%) showed an abnormal cell cluster by bh-SNE, with concordant results between manual and automated quantitation (y = x, r²  = 1). CLL cases clustered together and away from mantle cell lymphoma by bh-SNE and PCA with outlier atypical phenotype CLL cases posing diagnostic challenges by both manual and automated analysis.

CONCLUSION

The 14-color CD5+ LPD assay provides a robust standardization platform for MRD and disease characterization using both manual and automated analysis.

Recent progress of prognostic biomarkers and risk scoring systems in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent adult leukemia with high heterogeneity in the western world. Thus, investigators identified a number of prognostic biomarkers and scoring systems to guide treatment decisions and validated them in the context of immunochemotherapy. A better understanding of prognostic biomarkers, including serum markers, flow cytometry outcomes, IGHV mutation status, microRNAs, chromosome aberrations and gene mutations, have contributed to prognosis in CLL. Del17p/ TP53 mutation, NOTCH1 mutation, CD49d, IGHV mutation status, complex karyotypes and microRNAs were reported to be of predictive values to guide clinical decisions. Based on the biomarkers above, classic prognostic models, such as the Rai and Binet staging systems, MDACC nomogram, GCLLSG model and CLL-IPI, were developed to improve risk stratification and tailor treatment intensity. Considering the presence of novel agents, many investigators validated the conventional prognostic biomarkers in the setting of novel agents and only TP53 mutation status/del 17p and CD49d expression were reported to be of prognostic value. Whether other prognostic indicators and models can be used in the context of novel agents, further studies are required.

Relevance of Minimal Residual Disease in the Era of Targeted Agents

The evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved in parallel with the enormous progresses in the therapeutic armamentarium and the application of cutting-edge diagnostic techniques the CLL community witnessed in the past few years. Minimal residual disease is considered an objective measure of disease status defined by the number of residual leukemic cells detected in a sample of peripheral blood and/or bone marrow as proportion of the total white blood cells and defined undetectable if fewer than 1 CLL cell among 10,000 white blood cells (10 or 0.01%) is detected. In this review, we aim at shedding light on how to evaluate MRD, what we already know about MRD from the experience with chemoimmunotherapy, and why MRD evaluation remains still relevant in the era of targeted agents.

Stiffness based enrichment of leukemia cells using microfluidics

To improve the survival rate of cancer patients, new diagnosis strategies are necessary to detect lower levels of cancer cells before and after treatment regimens. The scarcity of diseased cells, particularly in residual disease after treatment, demands highly sensitive detection approaches or the ability to enrich the diseased cells in relation to normal cells. We report a label-free microfluidic approach to enrich leukemia cells from healthy cells using inherent differences in cell biophysical properties. The microfluidic device consists of a channel with an array of diagonal ridges that recurrently compress and translate flowing cells in proportion to cell stiffness. Using devices optimized for acute T cell leukemia model Jurkat, the stiffer white blood cells were translated orthogonally to the channel length, while softer leukemia cells followed hydrodynamic flow. The device enriched Jurkat leukemia cells from white blood cells with an enrichment factor of over 760. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the device were found to be >0.8. The values of sensitivity and specificity could be adjusted by selecting one or multiple outlets for analysis. We demonstrate that low levels of Jurkat leukemia cells (1 in 104 white blood cells) could be more quickly detected using flow cytometry by using the stiffness sorting pre-enrichment. In a second mode of operation, the device was implemented to sort resistive leukemia cells from both drug-sensitive leukemia cells and normal white blood cells. Therefore, microfluidic biomechanical sorting can be a useful tool to enrich leukemia cells that may improve downstream analyses.

Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Biomarkers in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a malignancy of B cells with a variable clinical course. Prognostication is important to place patients into different risk categories for guiding decisions on clinical management, to treat or not to treat. Although several clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular parameters have been established, in the past decade, a tremendous understanding of molecular lesions has been obtained with the advent of high-throughput sequencing. Meanwhile, rapid advances in the understanding of the CLL oncogenic pathways have led to the development of small-molecule targeting signal transducers, Bruton tyrosine kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, as well as anti-apoptotic protein BCL2 apoptosis regulator. After an initial response to these targeted therapies, some patients develop resistance and experience disease progression. Novel gene mutations have been identified that account for some of the drug resistance mechanisms. This article focuses on the prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers in CLL relevant to the molecular pathology practice, beginning with a review of well-established prognostic markers that have already been incorporated into major clinical guidelines, which will be followed by a discussion of emerging biomarkers that are expected to impact clinical practice soon in the future. Special emphasis will be put on predictive biomarkers related to newer targeted therapies in hopes that this review will serve as a useful reference for molecular diagnostic professionals, clinicians, as well as laboratory investigators and trainees.

Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in CLL: Ready for Use in Clinical Routine?

The introduction of chemoimmunotherapy and more recently the implementation of novel agents into first-line and relapse treatment have substantially improved treatment outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). With longer progression-free survival and more frequently observed deep remissions there is an emerging need for sensitive methods quantitating residual disease after therapy. Over the last decade, assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) has increasingly been implemented in CLL trials. The predictive value of MRD status on survival outcomes has repeatedly been proven in the context of chemoimmunotherapy and cellular therapies. Recent data suggests a similar correlation for Bcl-2 inhibitor-based therapy. While the relevance of MRD assessment as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials is largely undisputed, its role in routine clinical practice has not yet been well defined. This review outlines current methods of MRD detection in CLL and summarizes MRD data from relevant trials. The significance of MRD testing in clinical studies and in routine patient care is assessed and new MRD-guided treatment strategies are discussed.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: The Conundrum in Assessing the Therapy Response of Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

In 2018, the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) updated the guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Included were definitions for response, which incorporated consideration of the significance of minimal residual disease. Here we discuss the clinical significance of complete response or partial response, as defined in the 2018 iwCLL guidelines, and the relative value of assessing for minimal residual disease.

Tailored Treatment Strategies for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in a Rapidly Changing Era

The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is rapidly evolving, with multiple agents recently approved. They include a glycoengineered monoclonal antibody (obinutuzumab), B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors (ibrutinib, idelalisib, and duvelisib), and the BCL-2 inhibitor (venetoclax). These compounds are dramatically changing the natural course of the disease. Nonetheless, despite improved survival rates, particularly in higher-risk disease (older adults, patients with unmutated IGHV, del(11q), and del(17p)/TP53 mutated), there is still room for progress. Given the panoply of highly effective therapies commercially available, it is important to define a tailored treatment strategy for this heterogeneous condition that considers balance of treatment efficacy versus toxicity or tolerance. This article summarizes the most promising clinical advances by reviewing the data from recent clinical trials and discussing meaningful clinical endpoints, including the role of minimal residual disease assessment. The recent development of therapies targeting dysregulated pathways is revolutionary and may ultimately lead us to not only achieve prolonged remission durations but also envision the possibility of a functional cure for a larger population of patients.

The expanding role of venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma

The BCL-2 protein family members inhibit cellular apoptosis, and their overexpression represents a common survival adaption in cancer. Recently, a selective BCL-2 inhibitor ABT-199, venetoclax, has demonstrated remarkable activity in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), both as a single agent and in combination with anti-CD20 immunotherapies, such as rituximab. In this article, we review the development and latest clinical data that have led to the expanded approval of venetoclax with rituximab in relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. We also discuss ongoing and future clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of venetoclax in previously untreated patients and to investigate venetoclax combinations with inhibitors of B-cell receptor signaling pathway. These studies hope to offer an expanded list of chemotherapy-free regimens for patients with CLL/SLL.

On the front line: first choice pharmacotherapeutics for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a common hematologic malignancy with a highly variable clinical course. Frontline treatments include cytotoxic chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and small molecule inhibitors. Clinical and molecular factors guide treatment initiation and selection. Over the last decade, refinement of CLL risk stratification tools and growth of the arsenal of effective therapeutics have profoundly improved outcomes. These advances have concurrently increased the complexity of managing the early phases of treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the factors considered in the determination of first-line treatment of CLL. Areas of emphasis include assessment of patient fitness, disease classification and risk stratification, and the mechanisms, efficacy, and toxicities associated with available pharmacotherapeutics.

EXPERT OPINION

Multiple different treatments may be appropriate for a specific clinical scenario, and selection among them requires discussion of relative risks and benefits. Advances in frontline CLL treatment will continue to shift the treatment paradigm toward prioritizing quality of life alongside survival, limiting treatment and toxicity, and the development of biologically rational synergistic drug combinations and sequences.

Ibrutinib and its use in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Ibrutinib represents a revolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment scenario providing results never seen before and offering an effective therapy even in high-risk patients with really poor outcome after chemoimmunotherapy. Thanks to longer updates, on one hand, ibrutinib has confirmed its efficacy continuing to show clinical benefits over time; on the other hand, resistance mechanisms are slowly emerging. Moreover, clinicians should be aware of ibrutinib-related side effects, paying attention to screen patients that could benefit more from the drug and try to prevent adverse events. While ibrutinib approval indication is expanding, high treatment costs will shortly require a selection of those who can really draw advantage from Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition and those who could continue to be treated with chemoimmunotherapy.

Novel synthetic drugs currently in clinical development for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Over the last few years, several new synthetic drugs, particularly Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and BCL-2 inhibitors have been developed and investigated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Areas covered: This review highlights key aspects of BTK, PI3K and BCL-2 inhibitors that are currently at various stages of preclinical and clinical development in CLL. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles in English concerning CLL, B-cell receptor, BCL-2 antagonists, BTK inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, was conducted via PubMed. Publications from 2000 through July 2017 were scrutinized. The search terms used were acalabrutinib, ACP-196, BGB-3111, ONO-4059, GS-4059, duvelisib, IPI-145, TGR-1202, copanlisib, Bay 80-6946, buparlisib, BKM-120, BCL-2 inhibitors, venetoclax, ABT-263, navitoclax, CDK inhibitors, alvocidib, flavopiridol, dinaciclib, SCH 727,965, palbociclib, PD-0332991, in conjunction with CLL. Conference proceedings from the previous five years of the ASH and EHA Annual Scientific Meetings were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles. Expert opinion: The use of new synthetic drugs is a promising strategy for the treatment of CLL. Data from ongoing and future clinical trials will aid in better defining the status of new drugs in the treatment of CLL.