Safety and Efficacy of Bevacizumab Plus Standard-of-Care Treatment Beyond Disease Progression in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The AvaALL Randomized Clinical Trial

Ivonescimab in non-small cell lung cancer: harmonizing immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis has become a useful strategy in cancer treatment. Ivonescimab, the first-approved bispecific antibody targeting both immune checkpoint inhibition and anti-angiogenesis, represents a breakthrough over the conventional dual-drug combination approach. The emerging clinical evidence demonstrates promising efficacy and manageable safety profile of ivonescimab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), suggesting its potential role as a cornerstone in the next generation of cancer immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents the pharmacological characteristics of ivonescimab, revisits relevant clinical trials and key data, and provides an in-depth analysis. Additionally, the potential of ivonescimab in NSCLC treatment is discussed, along with its clinical prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

The available clinical data demonstrate that simultaneously targeting both immune checkpoint inhibition and angiogenesis pathways through a single bispecific antibody represents a significant therapeutic advancement in NSCLC treatment. Ivonescimab's innovative dual-targeting mechanism, supported by promising efficacy data from the HARMONi trials and its manageable safety profile, appears to be fundamental to its potential to challenge current standards of care. As the first approved bispecific antibody with this unique mechanism of action, ivonescimab may not only transform current treatment paradigms but also pioneer a new direction in cancer immunotherapy.

Quantitative Bias Analysis for Single-Arm Trials With External Control Arms

Importance

Unmeasured confounding is a key concern for decision-makers when observational datasets are used to assemble external control arms (ECAs) for single-arm trials.

Objective

To investigate the utility of quantitative bias analysis (QBA) for exploring the sensitivity to unmeasured confounding of nonrandomized analyses using ECAs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study emulated 15 treatment comparisons using experimental arms from existing randomized trials in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) conducted after 2011 and ECAs derived from observational data. Participants were eligible individuals diagnosed with aNSCLC between January 1, 2011, and March 1, 2020. After adjustment for measured baseline confounders, a prespecified QBA was conducted to address potential bias by known unmeasured and mismeasured confounders. The QBA relied on a synthesis of external evidence from a targeted literature search, randomized trial data, and clinician input. Hazard ratios from the original randomized trials were compared with those from their emulation based on ECA analyses. Analyses were completed from February 2022 to October 2023.

Exposure

Initiation of systemic therapies for aNSCLC.

Main outcomes and measures

Hazard ratios for all-cause death.

Results

Sample sizes varied from 52 to 830 depending on the treatment group. The mean difference in the log hazard ratio estimates when using the original control arm vs the ECA for each trial was 0.247 in unadjusted analyses (ratio of hazard ratios, 1.36), 0.139 when adjusted for measured confounders (ratio of hazard ratios, 1.22), and 0.098 when adding external adjustment for unmeasured and mismeasured confounders (ratio of hazard ratios, 1.17).

Conclusions and Relevance

QBA was feasible and informative in ECA analyses in which residual confounding was expected to be the most important source of bias. These findings encourage further exploration of how QBA can help quantify the impact of bias in other settings and when using other data sources.

Efficacy and Safety of KRASG12C Inhibitor IBI351 Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC: Results From a Phase 2 Pivotal Study

INTRODUCTION

KRAS glycine-to-cysteine substitution at codon 12 (G12C) mutation is a well-recognized and increasingly promising therapeutic target with huge unmet clinical needs in NSCLC patients. IBI351 is a potent covalent and irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C. Here, we present the efficacy and safety of IBI351 from an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 pivotal study.

METHODS

Eligible patients with NSCLC with KRAS G12C who failed standard therapy were enrolled. IBI351 was orally administered at a dose of 600 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate assessed by an independent radiological review committee (IRRC) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Other endpoints were safety, IRRC-confirmed disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival.

RESULTS

As of December 13, 2023, 116 patients were enrolled (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 1: 91.4%; brain metastasis: 30.2%; prior treatments with both anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy: 84.5%). As per the IRRC assessment, the confirmed objective response rate was 49.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.7-58.6), and the disease control rate was 90.5% (95% CI: 83.7-95.2). The median duration of response was not reached whereas disease progression or death events occurred in 22 patients (38.6%), and the median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.6-11.0). overall survival data was immature. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 107 patients (92.2%) whereas 48 patients (41.4%) had equal to or higher than grade three TRAEs. Common TRAEs were anemia (44.8%), increased alanine aminotransferase (28.4%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (27.6%), asthenia (26.7%) and presence of protein in urine (25.0%). TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in nine patients (7.8%). In biomarker evaluable patients (n = 95), all patients had positive KRAS G12C in tissue whereas 72 patients were blood-positive and 23 were blood-negative for KRAS G12C. Patients with KRAS G12C in both blood and tissue had higher tumor burden at baseline (p < 0.05) and worse PFS (p < 0.05). Tumor mutation profiling identified tumor protein p53 (45.3%), serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) (30.5%), and kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (21.1%) as the most common genes co-mutated with KRAS G12C. Among 13 genes with mutation frequency equal to or higher than 5%, mutations of six genes (STK11, kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit gamma, DNA polymerase epsilon, SMAD family member 4, and BMP/retinoic acid-inducible neural-specific protein 3) were significantly associated with worse PFS (p < 0.05). Mutation in STK11 was also found to have a significant association with higher tumor burden at baseline and lower response rate (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IBI351 monotherapy demonstrated promising and sustained efficacy with manageable safety, supporting its potential as a new treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC.

Bioinformatics-based screening and analysis of the key genes involved in the influence of antiangiogenesis on myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their effects on the immune microenvironment

This study aimed to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in the influence of antiangiogenic therapy on myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration and investigate their mechanisms of action. Data on DEGs after the action of antiangiogenic drugs in a pan-cancer context were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the clusterProfiler package in R software. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was performed using the gene set variation analysis package to evaluate the levels of immune cells and the activity of immune-related pathways. The relationships of DEGs with the infiltration levels of MDSCs and specific immune cell subpopulations were investigated via gene module analysis. The top 10 key genes were subsequently obtained from PPI network analysis using the cytoHubba plugin of the Cytoscape platform. When the DEGs of the four datasets were intersected, a DEG in the intersection of three datasets and 12 DEGs in the intersection of two datasets were upregulated, and 28 DEGs in the intersection of two datasets were downregulated. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the DEGs were associated with multiple important signaling pathways closely related to tumor onset and development, including cell differentiation, cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and immune responses. Most downregulated genes in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were positively correlated with MDSC expression. Only MGP was negatively correlated; the correlation between CACNG6 and MDSC expression was statistically insignificant. In lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), the relationships of PMEPA1, PCDH7, NEURL1B, and CACNG6 with MDSC expression were statistically insignificant; MGP was negatively correlated with MDSC expression. The top 10 key genes with the highest degree scores obtained using the cytoHubba plugin of Cytoscape were AURKB, RRM2, BUB1, NUSAP1, PRC1, TOP2A, NCAPH, CENPA, KIF2C, and CCNA2. Most of these genes were upregulated in LUAD and associated with immune cell infiltration and prognosis in tumors. An analysis of the relationships between DEGs and infiltration by other specific immune cells revealed the presence of consistent patterns in the downregulated genes, which exhibited positive correlations with the levels of Th2 cells, γδ T cells, and CD56dim NK cells, and negative correlations with other infiltrating immune cells. Antiangiogenic therapy may regulate MDSC infiltration through multiple important signaling pathways closely associated with tumor onset and development, such as cell differentiation, cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and immune responses. Antiangiogenic drugs may exert effects by affecting various types of infiltrating cells associated with immune suppression.

Five years of safety profile of bevacizumab: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance and randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. It has a wide range of clinical applications in various cancers and retinal diseases. The drugs entered the Chinese market by a large margin in 2017, and the user population changed to some extent. This study reevaluated the safety of bevacizumab through an analysis of the World Pharmacovigilance database (Food and Drug Administration Open Vigil 2.1) in conjunction with a comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs.

METHODS

Real-world pharmacovigilance data originating from case reports were mined using Open Vigil and coded at the preferred term (PT) level using the Standardized MedDRA Query. Proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and reporting odds ratios (ROR) were used to detect safety signals. Eligible items were screened by searching PubMed, Wanfang, and Web of Science, and data were extracted for systematic review and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Analysis of the drug pharmacovigilance database revealed that the most significant PRRs were limb decortication syndrome (PRR = 2926), stomal varices (PRR = 549), anastomotic (PRR = 457) and ureteral fistula (PRR = 406). Most safety signals at the PT level emerged as various types of injuries, toxicities, operational complications, systemic diseases, various reactions at the administration site, hematological and lymphatic disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders. Adverse reactions such as nasal septal perforation (PRR = 47.502), necrotizing fasciitis (PRR = 20.261), and hypertensive encephalopathy (PRR = 18.288) listed as rare in drug specifications should not be ignored with a high signal in the real world. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis, and the overall risk of adverse reactions following bevacizumab administration was relatively low, indicating a good safety profile (HR = 1.19, 95% CI:0.85 ~ 1.65, p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

The frequent adverse reactions of bevacizumab occurring in the real world are consistent with the data provided in RCTs and drug specifications. However, adverse reactions such as nasal septum perforation, necrotizing fasciitis, hypertensive encephalopathy and so on, listed as rare in drug specifications, may have a high signal of correlation in the real world, which all requires active monitoring and timely adjustment of bevacizumab posology during its clinical use.

Randomized, Phase II study of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab versus pemetrexed alone after treatment with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer: TORG (thoracic oncology research group) 1321

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin plus pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed is an efficacious platinum combination regimen for advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data regarding the addition of bevacizumab, especially in maintenance treatment, are insufficient.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included: no prior chemotherapy; advanced, non-squamous, NSCLC; performance status ≤1; and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-negative. Patients (N = 108) received induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for four cycles, and tumor response was needed to confirm four-week response duration. Patients with at least stable disease were randomized to pemetrexed/bevacizumab or pemetrexed alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after induction chemotherapy. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts of peripheral blood samples were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients each were randomized to the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group and the pemetrexed alone group. PFS was significantly better in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group than in the pemetrexed alone group (7.0 vs. 5.4 months, hazard ratio: 0.56 [0.34-0.93], log-rank p = 0.023). In patients with partial response to induction therapy, median overall survival was 23.3 months in the pemetrexed alone group and 29.6 months in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group (log-rank p = 0.077). Pretreatment monocytic (M)-MDSC counts tended to be greater in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group with poor PFS than in those with good PFS (p = 0.0724).

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed as maintenance therapy prolonged PFS in patients with untreated, advanced, non-squamous NSCLC. Furthermore, an early response to induction therapy and pretreatment M-MDSC counts may be related to the survival benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed.

Treatment beyond progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Treatment beyond progression (TBP) is defined as treatment continuing in spite of disease progression, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide evidence for the effects of TBP on lung cancer survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study has been conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials from the inception of each database to December 2021 was conducted. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion and extract data from all the retrieved articles. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). Hazard ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for survival outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified five (15.6%) prospective randomized trials and twenty-seven (84.4%) retrospective observational studies of a total of 9,631 patients for the meta-analysis. 3,941 patients (40.9%) were in a TBP group and 5,690 patients (59.1%) were in a non-TBP group. There is a statistically significant advantage for patients who received TBP compared with those who did not in post progression progression-free survival (ppPFS), post progression overall survival (ppOS), and overall survival (OS) from initiation of drugs (ppPFS: HR, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.644-0.865; P<0.001; ppOS: HR, 0.689; 95% CI, 0.596-0.797; P<0.001; OS from initiation of drugs: HR, 0.515; 95% CI, 0.387-0.685; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence in support of TBP for NSCLC, however, these results require cautious interpretation. Large, randomized, controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TBP in lung cancer treatment are warranted.

SYSTEMIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ identifier CRD42021285147.

The benefit of anti-angiogenic therapy in EGFR exon 21 L858R mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective study

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 21 L858R substitution benefit less from standard EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, and whether anti-angiogenic therapy was beneficial to the EGFR L858R subpopulation was inconclusive. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the survival benefit and the target characteristics of the anti-angiogenic agent in the EGFR L858R patients in our center, comparing those treated with or without anti-angiogenic therapy (cohort A and cohort B). At the median follow-up time of 31.0 months vs 32.7 months (cohort A vs. B) respectively, Cohort A (n = 58) had a significantly prolonged median OS compared to Cohort B (n = 101) (60.0 months vs.37.0 months, HR 0.51, p = 0.016). Anti-angiogenic therapy significantly prolonged the OS in patients with liver metastases (NA vs.26.0 months, HR 0.17, p = 0.023) comparing to patients without liver metastases (60.0 months vs.37.0 months, HR 0.63, p = 0.129). For brain metastatic patients, anti-angiogenic treatment tended to improve median OS with (65.0 months vs.35.0 months, HR 0.29, p = 0.068) or without brain radiotherapy (73.0 months vs.29.0 months, HR 0.24, p = 0.171). The grade 3 or more adverse events were manageable and consistent with previous studies. Patients with EGFR L858R mutation treated with anti-angiogenic therapy in their course of treatment had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those who had never received an anti-angiogenic agent. Patients with liver metastases might benefit more from anti-angiogenic therapy than those without.

Chidamide and apatinib are therapeutically synergistic in acute myeloid leukemia stem and progenitor cells

Background

Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are responsible for the initiation and perpetuation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and also represent leukemia relapse reservoirs with limited therapeutic approaches. Thus, additional treatment strategies are medical unmet needs to eliminate LSCs.

Methods

Cell counting kit-8 and Annexin-V-FITC/PI assays were used to examine the interaction of chidamide and apatinib on LSC-like cell lines (CD34⁺CD38⁻ KG1α and Kasumi-1 cells) and primary CD34⁺ AML cells. AML patient-derived xenografts were established to investigate the in vivo efficacy of the combined regimen. RNA sequencing, Glutamine uptake assay, oxygen consumption assay, and western blotting were employed to explore the molecule mechanism for the cytotoxicity of chidamide with or without apatinib against LSC-like cell lines and/or primary CD34⁺ AML cells.

Results

In this study, chidamide and apatinib were synergisitc to diminish cell viability and induce apoptosis in CD34⁺CD38⁻ KG1α and Kasumi-1 cells and in CD34⁺ primary AML cells. Importantly, chidamide combined with apatinib had more powerful in reducing leukemia burden and improving prognosis than single drug alone in an AML PDX model without significant adverse effects. Chidamide cytotoxicity was associated with decreasing glutamine uptake. The therapeutic synergy of chidamide and apatinib correlated with reprogramming of energy metabolic pathways. In addition, inactivating the VEGFR function and reducing the anti-apoptotic ability of the Bcl2 family contributed to the synergism of chidamide and apatinib in CD34⁺CD38⁻ KG1α cells and CD34⁺ primary AML cells.

Conclusion

Chidamide in combination with apatinib might be a promising therapeutic strategy to get rid of the population of AML stem and progenitor cells, and thus provide a potentially curative option in the treatment of patients with AML, although further clinical evaluations are required to substantiate the conclusion.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40164-022-00282-1.

[Anti-angiogenesis in Lung Cancer: Current Situation, Progress and Confusion]

Lung cancer is a highly vascular tumors, over the past ten years, anti-angiogenes is has been proved to be an effective and highly promising combinational treatment. The data of the combination of anti-angiogenesis with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy has been constantly updating. Advanced lung cancer patients, no matter different groups or different stages of the disease, are benefited from anti-angiogenes. In this paper, based on the clinical status and unsolved problems, combined with the latest clinical and translational research data, we reviewed the current anti-angiogenesis treatment of lung cancer.
.

The different overall survival between single-agent EGFR-TKI treatment and with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis

Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy or with bevacizumab in real-world non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was lacking. 310 patients of advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutation receiving first-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy or with bevacizumab were included and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analysed. Patients receiving EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab were significantly younger, had better performance status and with high incidence of brain metastasis (55.8%). In the propensity-score matched cohort, PFS (13.5 vs. 13.7 months; log-rank p = 0.700) was similar between the two groups. The OS (61.3 vs. 34.2 months; log-rank p = 0.010) and risk reduction of death (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.20–0.85]; p = 0.017) were significantly improved in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group. Analysis of treatment by brain metastasis status demonstrated EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab in patients with brain metastasis was associated with significant OS benefit compared to other groups (log-rank p = 0.030) and these patients had lower early-CNS and early-systemic progressions. The secondary T790M did not significantly differ between EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab and EGFR-TKI monotherapy groups (66.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.460). Forty-one (31.1%) and 31 (23.5%) patients received subsequent osimertinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The post-progression OS of osimertinib and chemotherapy were 22.1 and 44.9 months in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group and were 10.0 and 14.1 months in EGFR-TKI monotherpay group, respectively. First-generation EGFR-TKI with bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy in real-world patients of NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Patients with brain metastasis received additional OS benefit from this treatment.

Nephrotoxicity From Molecularly Targeted Chemotherapeutic Agents

The introduction of novel molecularly targeted therapies in the last 2 decades has significantly improved the patient survival compared to standard conventional chemotherapies. However, this improvement has been accompanied by a whole new spectrum of kidney adverse events. Although known as "targeted," many of these agents lack specificity and selectivity, and they have a tendency to inhibit multiple targets including those in the kidneys. Early detection and correct management of kidney toxicities is crucial to preserve kidney functions. The knowledge of these toxicities helps guide optimal and continued utilization of these potent therapies. The incidence, severity, and pattern of nephrotoxicity may vary depending on the respective target of the drug. Here, we review the mechanism of action, clinical findings of kidney adverse events, and their proposed management strategies.

Local Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with a Spray-Dried Bevacizumab Formulation

Local delivery of biotherapeutics to the lung holds great promise for treatment of lung diseases, but development of physically stable, biologically active dry powder formulations of large molecules for inhalation has remained a challenge. Here, spray drying was used to manufacture a dry powder pulmonary formulation of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody approved to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by intravenous infusion. By reformulating bevacizumab for local delivery, reduced side effects, lower doses, and improved patient compliance are possible. The formulation had aerosol properties suitable for delivery to the deep lung, as well as good physical stability at ambient temperature for at least 6 months. Bevacizumab’s anti-VEGF bioactivity was not impacted by the manufacturing process. The formulation was efficacious in an in vivo rat model for NSCLC at a 10-fold decrease in dose relative to the intravenous control.

The real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Anlotinib is an anti-angiogenetic multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in the real world.

METHODS

Patients with aNSCLC receiving anlotinib were enrolled in two cohorts (treatment naive and previously treated). The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and anlotinib-related adverse events (ar-AEs).

RESULTS

203 patients accrued in the study. In the treatment-naïve cohort (n = 80), the PFS was 7.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-10.7) and OS was 10.8 (95% CI 5.8-15.8) months of monotherapy group (immature survival for combination group). In previously treated cohort (n = 123), the PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.1-9.9) in the combination group and 4.3 months (95% CI 2.1-6.6) in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.83; p = 0.007), respectively. The OS was 18.5 months (95% CI 10.5-26.6) in the combination group and 7.8 months (95% CI 7.1-8.4) in the monotherapy group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.22-0.66; p = 0.001), respectively. The ar-AEs of grade ≥ 3 in the monotherapy and the combination groups were hypertension (9.0 and 8.7%), fatigue (8.1 and 7.6%), hand-foot syndrome (8.1 and 6.5%), diarrhea (5.4 and 8.7%), proteinuria (5.4 and 5.4%), and mucositis oral (6.3 and 8.7%).

CONCLUSION

In aNSCLC, anlotinib monotherapy has a promising efficacy in the first-line setting. It may be an option for those who are ineligible for chemotherapy; anlotinib combination therapy in a ≥ second-line setting showed manageable toxicities and encouraging efficacy, indicating a good application prospect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered with ISRCTN Registry (ID ISRCTN35543977) on January 26th, 2021 and Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2000032265) on April 4th, 2020.

The frequency of medical reversals in a cross-sectional analysis of high-impact oncology journals, 2009-2018

Background

Identifying ineffective practices that have been used in oncology is important in reducing wasted resources and harm. We sought to examine the prevalence of practices that are being used but have been shown in RCTs to be ineffective (medical reversals) in published oncology studies.

Methods

We cross-sectionally analyzed studies published in three high-impact oncology medical journals (2009–2018). We abstracted data relating to the frequency and characterization of medical reversals.

Results

Of the 64 oncology reversals, medications (44%) represented the most common intervention type (39% were targeted). Fourteen (22%) were funded by pharmaceutical/industry only and 56% were funded by an organization other than pharmaceutical/industry. The median number of years that the practice had been in use prior to the reversal study was 9 years (range 1–50 years).

Conclusion

Here we show that oncology reversals most often involve the administration of medications, have been practiced for years, and are often identified through studies funded by non-industry organizations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08632-8.

Immune-related genes and gene sets for predicting the response to anti-programmed death 1 therapy in patients with primary or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Although antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint protein programmed death-1 (PD-1) exert therapeutic effects in patients with primary or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the majority of patients exhibit partial or complete resistance to anti-PD1 treatment. Thus, the aim of the present study was to identify reliable biomarkers for predicting the response to anti-PD-1 therapy. The present study analyzed tumor specimens isolated from 24 patients (13 with primary and 11 with metastatic NSCLC) prior to treatment with approved PD1-targeting antibodies. The expression profile of 395 immune-related genes was examined using RNA immune-oncology panel sequencing. The results demonstrated that six immune-related differently expressed genes (DEGs), including HLA-F-AS1, NCF1, RORC, DMBT1, KLRF1 and IL-18, and five DEGs, including HLA-A, HLA-DPA1, TNFSF18, IFI6 and PTK7, may be used as single biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with primary and with metastatic NSCLC, respectively. In addition, two DEG sets comprising either six (HLA-F-AS1, NCF1, RORC, DMBT1, KLRF and IL-18) or two (HLA-A and TNFSF18) DEGs as potential combination biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with NSCLC. Patients with a calculated expression level of the DEG sets >6.501 (primary NSCLC) or >6.741 (metastatic NSCLC) may benefit from the anti-PD-1 therapy. Overall, these findings provided a basis for the identification of additional biomarkers for predicting the response to anti-PD-1 treatment.

Nephrotoxicity of Anti-Angiogenic Therapies

The use of inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) signaling for the treatment of cancer has increased over the last decade. This signaling pathway plays a fundamental role in angiogenesis and also in kidney physiology. The emergence of anti-angiogenic therapies has led to adverse nephrotoxic effects, despite improving the outcomes of patients. In this review, we will present the different anti-angiogenic therapies targeting the VEGFR pathway in association with the incidence of renal manifestations during their use. In addition, we will discuss, in detail, the pathophysiological mechanisms of frequent renal diseases such as hypertension, proteinuria, renal dysfunction, and electrolyte disorders. Finally, we will outline the cellular damage described following these therapies.

The Role of Anti-angiogenesis in the Treatment Landscape of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer - New Combinational Approaches and Strategies of Neovessel Inhibition

Tumor progression depends primarily on vascular supply, which is facilitated by angiogenic activity within the malignant tissue. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly vascularized tumor, and inhibition of angiogenesis was projected to be a promising therapeutic approach. Over a decade ago, the first anti-angiogenic agents were approved for advanced stage NSCLC patients, however, they only produced a marginal clinical benefit. Explanations why anti-angiogenic therapies only show modest effects include the highly adaptive tumor microenvironment (TME) as well as the less understood characteristics of the tumor vasculature. Today, advanced methods of in-depth characterization of the NSCLC TME by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) and preclinical observations enable a detailed characterization of individual cancer landscapes, allowing new aspects for a more individualized inhibition of angiogenesis to be identified. Furthermore, the tumor vasculature itself is composed of several cellular subtypes, which closely interact with other cellular components of the TME, and show distinct biological functions such as immune regulation, proliferation, and organization of the extracellular matrix. With these new insights, combinational approaches including chemotherapy, anti- angiogenic and immunotherapy can be developed to yield a more target-oriented anti-tumor treatment in NSCLC. Recently, anti-angiogenic agents were also shown to induce the formation of high endothelial venules (HEVs), which are essential for the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures, and key components in triggering anti-tumor immunity. In this review, we will summarize the current knowledge of tumor-angiogenesis and corresponding anti-angiogenic therapies, as well as new aspects concerning characterization of tumor-associated vessels and the resulting new strategies for anti-angiogenic therapies and vessel inhibition in NSCLC. We will further discuss why anti-angiogenic therapies form an interesting backbone strategy for combinational therapies and how anti-angiogenic approaches could be further developed in a more personalized tumor-oriented fashion with focus on NSCLC.

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab vs erlotinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: Survival follow-up results of the randomized JO25567 study

OBJECTIVES

The JO25567 randomized Phase II study demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with erlotinib plus bevacizumab compared with erlotinib monotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFR+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we present updated PFS and final overall survival (OS) data after a median follow-up of 34.7 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent NSCLC were randomized to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg once daily (n = 77) or erlotinib in combination with intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days (n = 75) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. OS was analyzed using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Consistent with the primary analysis, addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib was associated with a significant improvement in PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-0.76; log-rank two-sided P = 0.0005; median 16.4 months vs 9.8 months, respectively). In contrast, a significant improvement in OS was not seen (HR 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.53-1.23; P =  0.3267; median 47.0 months vs 47.4 months, respectively). Post-study therapy was similar between the treatment arms and EGFR mutation type did not affect OS outcomes. The 5-year OS rate was numerically higher with erlotinib plus bevacizumab vs erlotinib monotherapy (41 % vs 35 %). Updated safety analyses confirmed the previously reported manageable tolerability profile, with no new safety issues.

CONCLUSION

Addition of bevacizumab to first-line erlotinib did not show significant improvement in OS in Japanese patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent EGFR+ NSCLC. Both treatment arms showed a similar median OS benefit (as long as 4 years), irrespective of individual patient characteristics. Results from ongoing studies evaluating the combination of EGFR and VEGF signaling inhibitors are eagerly awaited.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-111390 and JapicCTI-142569.

The Anti-Angiogenic Effects of Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drugs

The growth and metastasis of malignant tumors benefit from the formation of blood vessels within the tumor area. There, new vessels originate from angiogenesis (the sprouting of pre-existing neighboring vessels) and/or vasculogenesis (the mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial cell precursors which incorporate in tumor vasculature and then differentiate into mature endothelial cells). These events are induced by soluble molecules (the angiogenic factors) and modulated by endothelial cell interactions with the perivascular matrix. Given angiogenesis/vasculogenesis relevance to tumor progression, anti-angiogenic drugs are often employed to buttress surgery, chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the treatment of a wide variety of cancers. Most of the anti-angiogenic drugs have been developed to functionally impair the angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor: however, this leaves other angiogenic factors unaffected, hence leading to drug resistance and escape. Other anti-angiogenic strategies have exploited classical inhibitors of enzymes remodeling the perivascular matrix. Disappointingly, these inhibitors have been found toxic and/or ineffective in clinical trials, even though they block angiogenesis in pre-clinical models. These findings are stimulating the identification of other anti-angiogenic compounds. In this regard, it is noteworthy that drugs utilized for a long time to counteract human immune deficiency virus (HIV) can directly and effectively hamper molecular pathways leading to blood vessel formation. In this review the mechanisms leading to angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, and their susceptibility to anti-HIV drugs will be discussed.

Aggrescan3D (A3D) 2.0: prediction and engineering of protein solubility

Protein aggregation is a hallmark of a growing number of human disorders and constitutes a major bottleneck in the manufacturing of therapeutic proteins. Therefore, there is a strong need of in-silico methods that can anticipate the aggregative properties of protein variants linked to disease and assist the engineering of soluble protein-based drugs. A few years ago, we developed a method for structure-based prediction of aggregation properties that takes into account the dynamic fluctuations of proteins. The method has been made available as the Aggrescan3D (A3D) web server and applied in numerous studies of protein structure-aggregation relationship. Here, we present a major update of the A3D web server to version 2.0. The new features include: extension of dynamic calculations to significantly larger and multimeric proteins, simultaneous prediction of changes in protein solubility and stability upon mutation, rapid screening for functional protein variants with improved solubility, a REST-ful service to incorporate A3D calculations in automatic pipelines, and a new, enhanced web server interface. A3D 2.0 is freely available at: http://biocomp.chem.uw.edu.pl/A3D2/

New advances in antiangiogenic combination therapeutic strategies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Tumor growth relies on the sufficient blood supply and continuously requires new blood vessels to maintain, which lead to vascular abnormalities (Folkman, N Engl J Med 285:1182-1186, 1971). Antiangiogenic therapy has emerged with the goal of normalizing vasculature and tumor microenvironment (TME). Some antiangiogenic therapies combined with chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy have been approved for clinical application. In this review, we summarize the recent advances of antiangiogenic combination therapeutic strategies in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

References of this review are searched through PubMed and EMBASE and the abstracts of cancer conferences. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was used for relative trials.

RESULTS

Based on different mechanisms, antiangiogenic agents can be divided into monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which mainly include bevacizumab and ramucirumab, and multi-target antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which include sunitinib, sorafenib, nintedanib, apatinib, anlotinib, fruquintinib, etc. In recent years, a number of large clinical studies have shown that antiangiogenic agents have conferred a significant overall survival (OS) benefit to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). More and more evidences confirm that the combination of antiangiogenic agents with chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy can improve the effect and prolong the survival of NSCLC patients. However, many problems about the application of antiangiogenic agents on advanced NSCLC patients still need to be explored. For example, the combination therapy of multi-target antiangiogenic agents is just beginning, and the biomarkers are not clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiangiogenic agents can achieve therapeutic benefit in advanced NSCLC patients and the combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy can lead to synergistic effect. However, exploring the best combination therapy and efficacy-related biomarkers needs further study.

Apatinib exhibits cytotoxicity toward leukemia cells by targeting VEGFR2-mediated prosurvival signaling and angiogenesis

OBJECTIVE

Vascular permeability contributes to disease progression and drug resistance in hematological malignancies, including AML. Thus, targeting angiogenic signaling is a promising treatment strategy, especially for relapsed and resistant AML. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of apatinib, a novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets VEGFR2.

METHODS

Several AML cell lines were exposed to various concentrations of apatinib, and then CCK8 and Annexin V/PI assays were performed to determine IC50 values and apoptosis, respectively. The effect of apatinib against primary AML cells from 57 adult patients and 11 normal controls was also analyzed utilizing an apoptosis assay. Next, we tested the underlying mechanism of apatinib in AML using western blotting and mass cytometry (CyTOF). Finally, the activity of apatinib against tumor growth and angiogenesis was further evaluated in vivo in xenograft models.

RESULTS

We found apatinib significantly inhibited growth and promoted apoptosis in AML cell lines in vitro. Similarly, apatinib showed cytotoxicity against primary AML cells but didn't affect normal BMMCs. Its effect was highly correlated with several clinical features, such as NPM1 mutation, extramedullary infiltration, relapsed/refractory disease, and M2 and M5 FAB subtypes. In addition, apatinib suppressed AML growth and attenuated angiogenesis in xenograft models. Mechanistically, apatinib-induced cytotoxicity was closely associated with inhibition of the VEGFR2-mediated Src/STAT3 and AKT/mTOR pathways and induction of mitochondria-mediated apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib exerts antileukemia effects by targeting VEGFR2-induced prosurvival signaling and angiogenesis, thus providing a rationale for the application of apatinib in AML.