Risk of Diabetes Associated With Cancer Development

Glycemic control in diabetic patients improved overall lung cancer survival across diverse populations

BACKGROUND

The consequence of diabetes on lung cancer overall survival (OS) is debated. This retrospective study used 2 large lung cancer databases to assess comprehensively diabetes effects on lung cancer OS in diverse demographic populations, including health disparity.

METHODS

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center database (32 643 lung cancer patients with 11 973 patients with diabetes) was extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) using natural language processing (NLP). Associations were between diabetes and lung cancer prognostic features (age, sex, race, body mass index [BMI], insurance status, smoking, stage, and histopathology). Hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1c) and glucose levels assessed glycemic control. Validation was with a Louisiana cohort (17 768 lung cancer patients with 5402 patients with diabetes) enriched for health disparity cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, and survival tree analyses were employed.

RESULTS

Lung cancer patients with diabetes exhibited marginally elevated OS or no statistically significant difference versus nondiabetic patients. When examining OS for 2 glycemic levels (HgbA1c > 7.0 or glucose > 154 mg/dL vs HgbA1c > 9.0 or glucose > 215 mg/dL), a statistically significant improvement in OS occurred in lung cancer patients with controlled versus uncontrolled glycemia (P < .0001). This improvement spanned sex, age, smoking status, insurance status, stage, race, BMI, histopathology, and therapy. Survival tree analysis revealed that obese and morbidly obese patients with controlled glycemia had higher lung cancer OS than comparison groups.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate a need for optimal glycemic control to improve lung cancer OS in diverse populations with diabetes.

Hyperglycemia induces gastric carcinoma proliferation and migration via the Pin1/BRD4 pathway

Diabetes is a potential risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). Pin1, a peptidyl–prolyl cis/trans isomerase, promotes GC cell proliferation and migration. The role and underlying mechanism of the Pin1/BRD4 axis in hyperglycemia-induced proliferation and migration of GC cells were analyzed in vivo and in vitro. Proliferation and migration of GC cells were measured; Pin1 and BRD4 expression of the cell cycle were determined. Pin1 and BRD4 were downregulated by transfecting Pin1 shRNA lentivirus into GC cells and JQ1-intervention GC cells. Tumor formation and lung metastasis were assessed in vivo. Inhibition of Pin1 and BRD4 significantly suppressed high-glucose (HG)-induced GC cell proliferation and migration. HG enhanced G1/S cell-cycle transition, associated with increased Pin1 and BRD4 expression. Silencing Pin1 significantly downregulated the expression of BRD4 and NAP1L1 and upregulated that of P21 in GC cells. In vivo studies indicated that hyperglycemia promotes tumor growth and lung metastasis by inducing Pin1 and BRD4 expression. Thus, Pin1/BRD4 plays an important role in hyperglycemia-promoted tumor growth. The significance of these findings toward improved prognosis of diabetic patients with GC cannot be underestimated.

The Survival Benefit for Optimal Glycemic Control in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Preexisting Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a frequent comorbidity in patients with cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with DM and to assess whether an optimal glycemic control improves overall survival (OS).

Methods

A total of 1279 advanced NSCLC patients including 300 (23.5%) with preexisting DM were retrospectively reviewed. The continuous relationship between glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) level and OS was analyzed by restricted cubic spline (RCS) function. Optimal HbA1c cut-off point was determined using X-tile analysis. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared among groups stratified by diabetes status and HbA1c. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to identify prognostic factors for OS after adjusting for baseline characteristics.

Results

DM and non-DM patients had similar OS (median (95% CI): 22.85 (20.05-26.73) vs. 22.22 (20.35-24.76) months, P=0.950). The multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that DM status was not a prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.952, 95% CI: 0.808-1.122, P=0.559). However, there existed a non-linear but generally positive relationship between the elevated HbA1c level and increased risk of overall mortality. HbA1c > 6.6% was a negative prognostic factor for OS (HR: 1.593, 95% CI: 1.113-2.280, P=0.011). The median OS (95% CI) for nondiabetic patients, DM patients with HbA1c ≤6.6% and those with HbA1c > 6.6% was 22.22 (20.01-24.43), 25.28 (21.79-28.77) and 15.45 (7.57-23.33) months, respectively. Well-controlled DM patients had a comparable crude OS (HR (95% CI): 0.90 (0.76-1.08), P=0.273] compared to nondiabetic patients while patients with HbA1c>6.6% had a worse crude OS than patients without DM (HR (95% CI): 1.70 (1.24-2.34), P=0.001]. The survival benefit of good HbA1c control was prominent in all subgroups.

Conclusion

Impaired glycemic level negatively affects survival for patients with advanced NSCLC while proper glycemic control with HbA1c ≤6.6% improves the OS.