Assessment of Duration and Effects of 3 vs 6 Months of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of the TOSCA Randomized Clinical Trial

MAPK Signaling-Mediated RFNG Phosphorylation and Nuclear Translocation Restrain Oxaliplatin-Induced Apoptosis and Ferroptosis

Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is crucial to develop novel strategies to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy. Here, the fringe family is screened to determine their contribution to chemotherapy resistance in CRC. It is found that RFNG depletion significantly sensitizes cancer cells to oxaliplatin treatment. Mechanistically, chemotherapy-activated MAPK signaling induces ERK to phosphorylate RFNG Ser255 residue. Phosphorylated RFNG S255 (pS255) interacts with the nuclear importin proteins KPNA1/importin-α1 and KPNB1/importin-β1, leading to its translocation into the nucleus where it targets p53 and inhibits its phosphorylation by competitively inhibiting the binding of CHK2 to p53. Consequently, the expression of CDKN1A is decreased and that of SLC7A11 is increased, leading to the inhibition of apoptosis and ferroptosis. In contrast, phosphor-deficient RFNG S225A mutant showed increased apoptosis and ferroptosis, and exhibited a notable response to oxaliplatin chemotherapy both in vitro and in vivo. It is further revealed that patients with low RFNG pS255 exhibited significant sensitivity to oxaliplatin in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model. These findings highlight the crosstalk between the MAPK and p53 signaling pathways through RFNG, which mediates oxaliplatin resistance in CRC. Additionally, this study provides guidance for oxaliplatin treatment of CRC patients.

Principles of risk assessment in colon cancer: immunity is key

In clinical practice, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) following tumor surgical resection raises a critical dilemma for stage II colon cancer (CC) patients. The prognostic features used to identify high-risk CC patients rely on the pathological assessment of tumor cells. Currently, these factors are considered for stratifying patients who may benefit from ACT at early CC stages. However, the extent to which these factors predict clinical outcomes (i.e. recurrence, survival) remains highly controversial, also uncertainty persists regarding patients' response to treatment, necessitating further investigation. Therefore, an imperious need is to explore novel biomarkers that can reliably stratify patients at risk, to optimize adjuvant treatment decisions. Recently, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of Immunoscore (IS), an immune digital-pathology assay, in stage II CC patients. IS emerged as the sole significant parameter for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in high-risk patients. Moreover, IS effectively stratified patients who would benefit most from ACT based on their risk of recurrence, thus predicting their outcomes. Notably, our findings revealed that digital IS outperformed the visual quantitative assessment of the immune response conducted by expert pathologists. The latest edition of the WHO classification for digestive tumor has introduced the evaluation of the immune response, as assessed by IS, as desirable and essential diagnostic criterion. This supports the revision of current cancer guidelines and strongly recommends the implementation of IS into clinical practice as a patient stratification tool, to guide CC treatment decisions. This approach may provide appropriate personalized therapeutic decisions that could critically impact early-stage CC patient care.

Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients' values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Elevated postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen guides adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer: a multicentre cohort retrospective study

Most clinical doctors rely on high-risk factors recommended by guidelines to decide whether to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. However, these high-risk factors do not include postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). This study aims to explore the elevation of postoperative CEA as a risk factor, in addition to other high-risk factors, to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on stage II colon cancer patients who underwent curative surgery at Yunnan Cancer Hospital and The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from April 2008 to January 2019. Patients were classified into three groups based on high-risk factors recommended by guidelines and postoperative CEA levels: low-risk with normal postoperative CEA, low-risk with elevated postoperative CEA and high-risk. COX regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors affecting patients' recurrence free survival (RFS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create the patients' RFS curve. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) curve was used to assess the correlation between postoperative CEA and RFS on a continuous scale. Among 761 patients, there were 444 males (62.01%), with a median [IQR] age of 58.0 (18.0-88.0) years. A group of 425 high-risk patients had a 3-year RFS of 82.2% (95% CI 78.5-86.1%), while a group of 291 low-risk patients had a 3-year RFS of 89.7% (95% CI 86.1-93.5%). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.22-2.74; P = 0.0067). Among them, the 3-year RFS of 261 low-risk patients with normal postoperative CEA was 93.6% (95% CI 90.5-96.8%), while the 3-year RFS of 30 low-risk patients with elevated postoperative CEA was 57.3% (95% CI 41.8-71.4%). There was a significant difference compared to the 3-year RFS of 425 high-risk patients (overall log-rank P < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis adjusted by the COX proportional hazards model showed that low-risk patients with elevated postoperative CEA patients (HR 14.95, 95% CI 4.51-49.63, P < 0.0001) was independently associated with a 3-year RFS. The restricted cubic spline model showed that in stage II colon cancer patients with tumor diameter > 1.955 ng/mL, the risk of postoperative recurrence increased with increasing postoperative CEA levels. Patients with elevated postoperative CEA levels have a significantly increased risk of recurrence. They should be included as high-risk factors to guide adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.

Spatial tumour gene signature discriminates neoplastic from non-neoplastic compartments in colon cancer: unravelling predictive biomarkers for relapse

BACKGROUND

Opting for or against the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in therapeutic management of stage II colon cancer remains challenging. Several studies report few survival benefits for patients treated with adjuvant therapy and additionally revealing potential side effects of overtreatment, including unnecessary exposure to chemotherapy-induced toxicities and reduced quality of life. Predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. We, therefore, hypothesise that the spatial tissue composition of relapsed and non-relapsed colon cancer stage II patients reveals relevant biomarkers.

METHODS

The spatial tissue composition of stage II colon cancer patients was examined by a novel spatial transcriptomics technology with sub-cellular resolution, namely in situ sequencing. A panel of 176 genes investigating specific cancer-associated processes such as apoptosis, proliferation, angiogenesis, stemness, oxidative stress, hypoxia, invasion and components of the tumour microenvironment was designed to examine differentially expressed genes in tissue of relapsed versus non-relapsed patients. Therefore, FFPE slides of 10 colon cancer stage II patients either classified as relapsed (5 patients) or non-relapsed (5 patients) were in situ sequenced and computationally analysed.

RESULTS

We identified a tumour gene signature that enables the subclassification of tissue into neoplastic and non-neoplastic compartments based on spatial expression patterns obtained through in situ sequencing. We developed a computational tool called Genes-To-Count (GTC), which automates the quantification of in situ signals, accurately mapping their position onto the spatial tissue map and automatically identifies neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue compartments. The GTC tool was used to quantify gene expression of biological processes upregulated within the neoplastic tissue in comparison to non-neoplastic tissue and within relapsed versus non-relapsed stage II colon patients. Three differentially expressed genes (FGFR2, MMP11 and OTOP2) in the neoplastic tissue compartments of relapsed patients in comparison to non-relapsed patients were identified predicting recurrence in stage II colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In depth spatial in situ sequencing showed potential to provide a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in the recurrence of disease and revealed novel potential predictive biomarkers for disease relapse in colon cancer stage II patients. Our open-access GTC-tool allowed us to accurately capture the tumour compartment and quantify spatial gene expression in colon cancer tissue.

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in colorectal cancer patients: mechanisms, pharmacokinetics and strategies

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment approach for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OIPN) is a severe dose-limiting clinical problem that might lead to treatment interruption. This neuropathy may be reversible after treatment discontinuation. Its complicated mechanisms are related to DNA damage, dysfunction of voltage-gated ion channels, neuroinflammation, transporters, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, etc. Several strategies have been proposed to diminish OIPN without compromising the efficacy of adjuvant therapy, namely, combination with chemoprotectants (such as glutathione, Ca/Mg, ibudilast, duloxetine, etc.), chronomodulated infusion, dose reduction, reintroduction of oxaliplatin and topical administration [hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)]. This article provides recent updates related to the potential mechanisms, therapeutic strategies in treatment of OIPN, and pharmacokinetics of several methods of oxaliplatin administration in clinical trials.

Underutilization or appropriate care? Assessing adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in 3 heterogenous subpopulations with stage II/III colorectal cancer within a large integrated health system

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines have recommended adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, although the survival benefit is unclear. ACT is also recommended for patients with stage III colon cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence and mortality. For stage II/III rectal cancer, however, the role of perioperative chemotherapy (PCT, adjuvant or neoadjuvant) remains controversial, resulting in substantial variation in its use in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To understand real-world use and predictors of ACT or PCT use and survival outcomes in 3 heterogeneous patient groups with colorectal cancer (CRC), and to inform the evidence gap between guideline-based care and clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with an initial stage II/III CRC diagnosis between 2008 and 2013 identified from Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health record databases. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-74 years at diagnosis and received primary curative surgery. We fitted mixed effects logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of ACT receipt and Cox proportional hazards models on propensity score-matched (PS-matched) samples to assess the association between ACT/PCT receipt and survival. RESULTS: We included 1,690 patients with colon cancer (stage II: 820 and stage III: 870) and 587 patients with rectal cancer (stage II: 241 and stage III: 346). We found that 65% of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, 15% of those with stage III colon, and 15% of those with stage II/III rectal cancer did not receive ACT/PCT. Patients with stage II colon cancer with T4 stage (odds ratio [OR] = 5.79, 95% CI = 3.33 - 10.06) and a lower comorbidity score were more likely to receive ACT (high vs low Charlson score: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 - 0.87). Patients with stage III rectal cancer were more likely to receive PCT than those with stage II disease (OR = 7.85, 95% CI = 2.07 - 29.74). Patients with another cancer diagnosis prior to CRC diagnosis were less likely to receive PCT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.16 - 0.85). ACT/PCT use was associated with improved overall survival among patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (PS-matched hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.70) and those with stage III CRC (stage III colon: PS-matched HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.36; stage III rectal: PS-matched HR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.13 - 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: We found potential underuse of appropriate chemotherapy treatment in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer and stage III CRC. Clinicians' and providers' decisions on ACT administration may not be fully guided by the risk of recurrence and 5-year survival benefits in stage II colon cancer. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (under R37-CA218413). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

The c-MYC-WDR43 signalling axis promotes chemoresistance and tumour growth in colorectal cancer by inhibiting p53 activity

Oxaliplatin chemoresistance is a major challenge in the clinical treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC), which is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. In this study, we identified the tryptophan-aspartate repeat domain 43 (WDR43) as a potentially critical oncogenic factor in CRC pathogenesis through bioinformatics analysis. It was found that WDR43 is highly expressed in CRC tissues, and WDR43 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis of CRC patients. WDR43 knockdown significantly inhibits cell growth by arresting cell cycle and enhancing the effect of oxaliplatin chemotherapy both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, upon oxaliplatin stimulation, c-MYC promotes the transcriptional regulation and expression of WDR43. WDR43 enhances the ubiquitination of p53 by MDM2 through binding to RPL11, thereby reducing the stability of the p53 protein, which induces proliferation and chemoresistance of CRC cells. Thus, the overexpression of WDR43 promotes CRC progression, and could be a potential therapeutic target of chemoresistance in CRC.

A predictive nomogram model for low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and to construct a nomogram capable of predicting the risk of LARS in patients who undergo rectal cancer resection.

METHODS

About 538 patients who had undergone anterior resection were recruited as a development set. In addition, 114 patients with rectal cancer were analysed as a validation set to test the new nomogram. Patients in the development set were grouped into two separate cohorts: those with major LARS and those with minor or no LARS. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to detect risk factors for major LARS.

RESULTS

The prevalence of major LARS was 40.7%, of minor LARS was 28.6% and the proportion with no LARS was 30.7% in the development set. In multivariate analysis, female gender, preoperative chemoradiation, low tumour height, diverting ileostomy, postoperative anastomotic leakage were shown to be independently associated with major LARS occurring in patients after rectal cancer resection. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the nomogram were 0.726 (95% CI: 0.682-0.769) and 0.750 (95% CI: 0.655-0.845) in the development and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit tests showed that the model was acceptably accurate.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram model based on risk factors could be valuable as a predictor of the probability of major LARS after rectal cancer surgery, and provides a guide that clinical staff can use to take preventive measures for high-risk patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits on patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in stage IIA colon cancer: a SEER-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

Indications for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA (T3N0M0) colon cancer are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IIA colon cancer. We aimed to examine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS in stage IIA colon cancer patients with elevated CEA levels.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIA colon cancer (N = 3477) diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the prognostic effect of CEA on CSS and OS.

RESULTS

Cox regression analysis demonstrated that CEA was an independent risk factor for CSS and OS in patients with stage IIA colon cancer (CSS: HR = 2.001, 95% CI 1.603-2.499, P < 0.001; OS: HR = 1.530, 95% CI 1.335-1.752, P < 0.001). In the subgroup with elevated CEA, patients received adjuvant chemotherapy had a better OS compared with those did not (χ2 = 10.585, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CEA was an independent risk factor for CSS and OS in patients with stage IIA colon cancer. Patients with stage IIA colon cancer with an elevated CEA level might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy benefits after complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: Reanalysis of data from the ESCME trial

AIM

The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colon cancer after complete mesocolic excision (CME) have not been evaluated sufficiently. We reanalysed the ESCME trial data to investigate the survival benefits and establish AC stratified indications.

METHODS

The data of Stage II and III colon cancer patients who received CME in the ESCME trial were reanalysed. Patients were divided into AC and non-AC (NAC) groups. The primary outcomes measured were differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival (DFS) between the groups.

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients enrolled in the study, 125 patients (AC, 49; NAC, 76) had Stage II cancer and 111 (AC, 86; NAC, 25) had Stage III cancer. There were no significant differences in the adjusted 5-year cancer-specific survival and DFS between the AC and NAC groups. Poor differentiation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.947; 95% CI 1.218-7.131) and RAS mutation (HR 3.140; 95% CI 1.363-7.234) affected the 5-year DFS significantly in multivariate Cox regression analysis for Stage II and III cancer, respectively. In subgroup analysis, AC significantly improved 5-year DFS (HR 0.369; 95% CI 0.140-0.978) for Stage III cancer with lymphovascular/perineural invasion compared to NAC.

CONCLUSION

The current indication and benefits of AC for colon cancer patients after CME should be re-evaluated. AC is more appropriate for Stage III cancer with lymphovascular/perineural invasion.

Integrated network pharmacology and serum metabolomics approach deciphers the anti-colon cancer mechanisms of Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction

Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction (HGWD), as a classic Chinese herbal decoction, has been widely used in treating various diseases for hundreds of years. However, systematically elucidating its mechanisms of action remains a great challenge to the field. In this study, taking advantage of the network pharmacology approach, we discovered a potential new use of HGWD for patients with colon cancer (CC). Our in vivo result showed that orally administered HGWD markedly inhibited the growth of CC xenografts in mice. The subsequent enrichment analyses for the core therapeutic targets revealed that HGWD could affect multiple biological processes involving CC growth, such as metabolic reprogramming, apoptosis and immune regulation, through inhibiting multiple cell survival-related signalings, including MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways. Notably, these in silico analysis results were most experimentally verified by a series of in vitro assays. Furthermore, our results based on serum metabolomics showed that the lipid metabolic pathways, including fatty acid biosynthesis and cholesterol metabolism, play key roles in delivery of the anti-CC effect of HGWD on tumor-bearing mice, and that cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily E member 1 (CYP2E1) is a potential therapeutic target. Together, our integrated approach reveals a therapeutic effect of HGWD on CC, providing a valuable insight into developing strategies to predict and interpret the mechanisms of action for Chinese herbal decoctions.

Zuo Jin Wan Reverses the Resistance of Colorectal Cancer to Oxaliplatin by Regulating the MALAT1/miR-200s/JNK Signaling Pathway

Background

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a common chemotherapy drug used in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Our previous work showed that Zuo Jin Wan (ZJW), a traditional Chinese medicine prescription, could improve sensitivity to L-OHP in the treatment of CRC, but the detailed mechanism is not clear. In previous mechanistic studies, we found that the miR-200s expression in CRC is associated with L-OHP sensitivity through regulation of MDR1/p-gp and the downstream c-JunN-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway. Moreover, lncRNA-MALAT1 offers great potential in the regulation of drug resistance by interacting with miR-200s. Therefore, in this work, we explored whether ZJW could reverse L-OHP resistance in CRC by regulating MALAT1, miR-200s, and the downstream signaling pathway.

Methods

Cell Counting Kit-8 and flow cytometry were used to detect the effects of ZJW combined with L-OHP on chemotherapy tolerance and cell apoptosis of HCT116/L-OHP cells. Western blotting and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were used to detect the activation of the JNK signaling pathway and the protein and mRNA expression levels of the drug resistance-related MDR1/ABCB1 gene in HCT116/L-OHP cells treated with ZJW. The binding sites of MALAT1 and miR-200s were predicted by bioinformatics tools and confirmed by qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR was used to detect the expression of miR-200s and MALAT1 in HCT116/L-OHP cells treated with ZJW. A xenograft model of CRC in nude mice was established to observe the effect of ZJW combined with L-OHP on the growth of subcutaneously transplanted tumors. Apoptosis in tumor cells was detected by TUNEL staining. The activation of the JNK signaling pathway and the expression of drug resistance-related proteins were detected by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. qRT-PCR was used to detect the expression of miR-200s and the MALAT1 gene in the tumors.

Results

Our study showed that ZJW could significantly decrease the proliferation and promote apoptosis of HCT116/L-OHP cells treated with L-OHP. We further proved that ZJW could reverse the drug resistance of HCT116/L-OHP cells by reducing MALAT1, indirectly upregulating miR-200s, alleviating the activation of the JNK signaling axis, and downregulating the expression of resistance proteins such as MDR1/ABCB1 and ABCG2. ZJW combined with L-OHP inhibited the growth of subcutaneously transplanted tumors and induced apoptosis in nude mice. ZJW reduced the expression of MALAT1 and upregulated the expression of miR-200s in transplanted tumors. In addition, ZJW also alleviated the activation of the JNK signaling pathway while reducing the expression of MDR1/ABCB1 and ABCG2.

Conclusions

Our study identified that MALAT1 promotes colorectal cancer resistance to oxaliplatin by reducing the miR-200s expression. ZJW may reverse chemoresistance by inhibiting the expression of MALAT1 and regulating the miR-200s/JNK pathway, providing an experimental basis for the clinical application of ZJW in relieving chemotherapy resistance.

Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cells Based on Subtraction Enrichment for Recurrence Risk in Stage II Colorectal Cancer

Current guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients by using clinical high risk factors, with which circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were not considered. Here, an assessment to detect CTCs based on subtraction enrichment mediated by magnetic beads conjugated with CD45, immunofluorescence staining of CK, and fluorescence in situ hybridization of CEP8 is established. Both CEP8- and CK-positive CTCs have the potential to improve the risk stratification of stage II CRC patients. Patients with preoperative CTCs of ≥4 had a significantly higher recurrence risk than those with preoperative CTCs of <4 in two external validation cohorts (P < 0.0001). In the subgroup with clinical high risk, when preoperative CTCs were <4, patients did not benefit from ACT (P = 0.5764); however, when preoperative CTCs were ≥4, patients received benefit from ACT (P = 0.0064). Additionally, regardless of clinical risk status and preoperative CTC levels, if postoperative CTC levels were ≥4 for more than three consecutive time points (monitoring time interval, 2-6 months), the recurrence rate was 100%. Our findings suggested that the subtraction enrichment of CTCs could provide a reliable method to stratify the recurrence risk and make therapeutic decisions after surgery in stage II CRC patients.

A Postsurgical Prognostic Nomogram for Locally Advanced Rectosigmoid Cancer to Assist in Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Background

The perioperative treatment model for locally advanced rectosigmoid junction cancer (LARSC) has not been finalized; whether this model should refer to the treatment model for rectal cancer remains controversial.

Methods

We screened 10,188 patients with stage II/III rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2016 from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Among them, 4,960 did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, while 5,228 did receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to balance the two groups for confounding factors, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors and build a predictive nomogram of survival for LARSC. X-tile software was used to divide the patients into three groups (low, medium, and high) according to their risk scores. 726 patients in our hospital were included for external validation.

Results

LARSC patients did not show a benefit from neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P>0.05). After further excluding patients who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy, multivariate analysis found that age, grade, tumor size, T stage, and log odds of positive lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors for patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and were included in the nomogram. The C-index of the model was 0.690 (95% confidence interval: 0.668–0.712). We divided the patients into low, moderate, and high risk subgroups based on prediction scores of the nomogram. We found that adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of low risk patients, while moderate and high risk patients benefited from adjuvant therapy. External validation data found that moderate, and high risk patients also benefited from AT.

Conclusion

Direct surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy may be the best perioperative treatment for LARSC. Moreover, adjuvant chemotherapy is only recommended for moderate and high risk patients as it did not benefit low risk patients.

Biology and Clinical Implications of Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer

Background

Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces mortality, with earlier stage at diagnosis a prominent feature. Other characteristics of FOBT screen-detected cancers and any implications for clinical management have not been well explored.

Methods

We examined a multi-site clinical registry to compare the characteristics and outcomes of FOBT screen-detected CRC via the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP), which is offered biennially to 50-74 year olds, and age matched non-screen detected cases in the same registry. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Odds Ratios were calculated using the Baptista-Pike method and Hazard Ratios via the log-rank method.

Results

Of 7,153 registry patients diagnosed June 1, 2006 to June 30, 2020, 4142 (57.9%) were aged between 50-74 years old. Excluding 406 patients with non-NBCSP screen-detected cancers and 35 patients with unknown method of detection, 473 (12.8%) were screen-detected via the NBCSP and 3228 (87.2%) were non screen-detected. Screen-detected patients were younger (mean age= 62.4 vs 64.2 years, P&lt;.001) and more medically fit (Odds Ratio [OR] for ASA score 1-2 = 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.51 to 2.41, P&lt;.001). Pathologic characteristics within each stage favoured the screen-detected cases. Stage III screen-detected colon cancers were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy (OR = 3.58, 95% CI = 1.52 to 8.36, P=.002). Screen-detected patients had superior relapse free (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.60, P&lt;.001) and overall survival (HR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.35, P&lt;.001), which was maintained in matched stage comparisons and multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Beyond stage at diagnosis multiple other factors associated with a favourable outcome are observed in FOBT screen-detected CRC. Given the substantial stage by stage differences in survival outcomes, if independently confirmed, individualised adjuvant therapy and surveillance strategies could be warranted for FOBT screen-detected cancers.

Regulation of signal transduction pathways in colorectal cancer: implications for therapeutic resistance

Resistance to anti-cancer treatments is a critical and widespread health issue that has brought serious impacts on lives, the economy and public policies. Mounting research has suggested that a selected spectrum of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) tend to respond poorly to both chemotherapeutic and targeted therapeutic regimens. Drug resistance in tumours can occur in an intrinsic or acquired manner, rendering cancer cells insensitive to the treatment of anti-cancer therapies. Multiple factors have been associated with drug resistance. The most well-established factors are the emergence of cancer stem cell-like properties and overexpression of ABC transporters that mediate drug efflux. Besides, there is emerging evidence that signalling pathways that modulate cell survival and drug metabolism play major roles in the maintenance of multidrug resistance in CRC. This article reviews drug resistance in CRC as a result of alterations in the MAPK, PI3K/PKB, Wnt/β-catenin and Notch pathways.

Rapid multi-dynamic algorithm for gray image analysis of the stroma percentage on colorectal cancer

Background: Tumor stroma percentage (TSP), as an independent, low-cost prognostic factor, could complement current pathology and act as a more feasible risk factor for prognosis. However, TSP hadn't been applied into TNM staging. Here, the objective of our study was to investigate the prognostic significance of TSP in a robust rapid multi-dynamic approach with the application of MATLAB and threshold Algorithm for Gray Image analysis.

Methods: Using a retrospective collection of 1539 CRC patients comprising three independent cohorts; one SGH cohort (N=996) and two validation cohorts (N =106, N= 437) from 2 institutions. We investigated 996 CRC of no special type. According to our established thresholds, 357 cases (35.84%) were classified as TSP-high and 639 cases (64.16%) as TSP-low. We determined the gray image area as the stromal part of the WSI and calculated the stroma percentage with our proposed method on MATLAB software.

Results: In both TSP-cad(50%) and TSP-cad(median), multivariate analysis showed the TSP-cad was an independent prognostic factor for the vessel invasion and tumor location. For OS, TSP-manual HR=1.512 (95% CI 1.045-2.187); TSP-cad HR=1.443 (95% CI 0.993-2.097) and TSP-cad(median) HR=1.632 (95% CI 1.105-2.410). Fortunately, TSP-manual and TSP-cad were also found independent prognostic factor in all the cohorts. It was found that TSP-cad had slightly higher HR and wider CI than TSP-manual.

Conclusions: Our research showed that TSP was an independent prognostic factor in CRC. Moreover, threshold algorithm for the quantitation of TSP could be established. In conclusion, with this Rapid multi-dynamic threshold Algorithm for Gray Image counting of TSP, which showed a higher accuracy than manual evaluation by pathologists and could be a practical method for CRC to guide clinical decision making.

Impact of the 12-gene recurrence score assay on deciding adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and IIIA/B colon cancer: the SUNRISE-DI study

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in adjuvant chemotherapy for early colon cancer have widened physicians' recommendations on the regimen and duration (3 or 6 months) of the treatment. We conducted this prospective study to evaluate whether the 12-gene recurrence score (12-RS) assay affected physicians' recommendations on adjuvant treatment selection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIA/IIIB or stage II colon cancer were enrolled. After the patients discussed adjuvant treatment with their treating physicians, the physicians filled in the questionnaire before assay indicating the treatment recommendation. When the 12-RS assay results were available, the physicians again filled in the questionnaire after assay. The primary endpoint was the rate of change in treatment recommendations from before to after the assay, with a threshold rate of change being 20%. Patients with stage IIIA/B to II were enrolled in a ratio of 2 : 1.

RESULTS

Overall, the treatment recommendations changed in 40% of cases after obtaining 12-RS assay results. Recommendations were changed in 45% (80/178; 95% confidence interval, 37% to 53%; P < 0.001) and 30% (29/97; 95% confidence interval, 21% to 40%; P < 0.001) of patients with stage IIIA/B and II colon cancer, respectively. Patients with stage IIIA/B cancer had significantly more change than those with stage II cancer (P = 0.0148). From before to after the 12-RS assay, the percentage of patients whose physicians reported being confident in their treatment recommendations significantly increased from 54% to 81% in stage IIIA/B (P < 0.001) and from 65% to 83% in stage II (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the usefulness of the 12-RS assay in aiding the physician-patient decision-making process for tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIA/B colon cancer.

Introducing longitudinal cumulative dose to describe chemotherapy patterns over time: Case study of a colon cancer trial

Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens take months to complete. Despite this, studies evaluate chemotherapy adherence via measures assessed at the end of treatment (eg, number of patients missing any dose, relative dose intensity [RDI]). This approach ignores information like the timing of treatment delays. We propose longitudinal cumulative dose (LCD) to integrate impacts of dose reductions, missed doses and dose delays over time. We obtained data from the 2246 participants in the MOSAIC trial randomized to FOLFOX (all three agents) or 5-FU/LV (only 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin). We evaluated proportions of patients stopping treatment early and reducing, missing or delaying a dose in each arm for each chemotherapy agent at each cycle. We calculated LCD, the fraction of the final standard dose a participant reached by a given day, for each participant and each agent and compared it over time and at 24 weeks between treatment arms. Participants randomized to FOLFOX were more likely to stop treatment, reduce doses, miss doses or delay cycles; these differences increased over time. Median LCD for oxaliplatin in the FOLFOX arm at 24 weeks was 77%. The LCD for 5-fluorouracil differed between arms (FOLFOX arm median: 81%; 5-FU/LV arm median: 96%). Visualizing LCD highlighted the timing of deviations from standard administration in a way RDI could not, with major differences in 5-fluorouracil LCD across treatment arms beginning after the sixth dose. Further evaluation of LCD and its impacts on clinical outcomes may clarify mechanisms for heterogeneous patient outcomes.

A Phase II Study Demonstrates No Feasibility of Adjuvant Treatment with Six Cycles of S-1 and Oxaliplatin in Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, with ERCC1 as Biomarker for Response to SOX

Simple Summary

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is currently standard of care in esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, prognosis remains dismal. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of administering six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. Although six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated patients, mainly due to toxicity, efficacy results were promising compared to a propensity-score matched cohort. Exploratory biomarker analyses demonstrated potential benefit for patients with Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) negative tumor expression. A proteomics biomarker model provided valuable information for prediction of survival and pharmacokinetics of 5-FU showed a correlation with treatment-related toxicity. Although it remains unclear if additional chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity, could potentially benefit from this treatment option based on our exploratory biomarker research.

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Patients treated with nCRT (paclitaxel, carboplatin) and esophagectomy received six 21-day cycles with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m²) on day 1 and S-1 (25 mg/m² twice daily) on days 1–14. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥50% completing treatment. We performed exploratory propensity-score matching to compare survival, ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase (TS) immunohistochemistry analyses, proteomics biomarker discovery and 5-FU pharmacokinetic analyses. Forty patients were enrolled and 48% completed all adjuvant cycles. Median dose intensity was 98% for S-1 and 62% for oxaliplatin. The main reason for early discontinuation was toxicity (67%). The median recurrence-free and overall survival were 28.3 months and 40.8 months, respectively (median follow-up 29.1 months). Survival was not significantly prolonged compared to a matched cohort (p = 0.09). Patients with ERCC1 negative tumor expression had significantly better survival compared to ERCC1 positivity (p = 0.01). Our protein signature model was predictive of survival [p = 0.04; Area under the curve (AUC) 0.80]. Moreover, 5-FU pharmacokinetics significantly correlated with treatment-related toxicity. To conclude, six cycles adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although the question remains whether additional treatment with chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity could potentially benefit from adjuvant SOX based on our exploratory biomarker research.

Randomised phase II trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with continuous versus intermittent use of oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III colon cancer (CCOG-1302 study)

BACKGROUND

Peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) caused by oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects patients' quality of life. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) with intermittent oxaliplatin use compared with the standard CAPOX in adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with curative resection for stage II/III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either CAPOX with continuous oxaliplatin (eight cycles of CAPOX) or CAPOX with intermittent oxaliplatin (two cycles of CAPOX, four cycles of capecitabine and two cycles of CAPOX). The primary end-point was the 1-year PSN rate, and the key secondary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were enrolled in the intent-to-treat population. After 4 patients withdrew, 196 patients were included in the safety analysis. The overall treatment completion rate was 65% for continuous vs. 89% for intermittent treatment (p < 0.001). The 1-year PSN rate was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-70%) for continuous and 16% (95% CI, 10%-25%) for intermittent treatment (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 52 months, 40 events (20%) were observed. The 3-year DFS was 81% (95% CI, 71%-87%) for continuous and 84% (95% CI, 75%-90%) for intermittent treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.47-1.63). Among patients with high-risk disease (T4 or N2-3), the 3-year DFS was 57% for continuous vs. 74% for intermittent treatment (HR, 0.66).

CONCLUSION

CAPOX with planned intermittent oxaliplatin may be feasible as an adjuvant therapy for colon cancer and substantially reduce the duration of long-lasting PSN.

TRIAL IDENTIFIER

UMIN000012535.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer

Simple Summary

Stage II colon cancer is defined as an early stage of the tumor disease, without the involvement of lymph nodes or distant organs. In this group of patients, surgery alone is associated with high cure rate and the role of post-operative chemotherapy is still a matter of debate. In patients with tumor features associated with a high risk of recurrence, post-operative chemotherapy is recommended even if it has a small survival benefit. This clinical issue leads to the need for identifying patients who may benefit from post-operative chemotherapy based on their risk of recurrence. The purpose of this review is to highlight and discuss the uncertainties of the previous trials about the risk stratification, the weight of each prognostic factor and the therapeutic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer patients. Moreover, we summarize the data from previous studies in a decision algorithm that could help clinicians in clinical practice.

Abstract

In stage II colon cancer management, surgery alone has shown a high cure rate (about 80%), and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is still a matter of debate. Patients with high-risk features (T4, insufficient nodal sampling, grading, etc.) have a poorer prognosis and, usually, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended. The purpose of the present study is to highlight and discuss what is still unclear and not completely defined from the previous trials regarding risk stratification and therapeutic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. With all the limitations of generalizing, we make the effort of trying to quantify the relative contribution of each prognostic factor and the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. Finally, we propose a decision algorithm with the aim of summarizing the current evidence and translating it to clinical practice.

The Optimal Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (UICC stage II and III) has been under investigation over the last 30 years, regarding treatment duration and regimens. In this review, choice of regimen, its duration, possible limitations and future perspectives are discussed. Monotherapy with 5-fluorouracil was followed by addition of oxaliplatin, resulting in improved 3-yr disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates, but also increased peripheral sensory neurotoxicity (PSN). The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant therapy (IDEA) collaboration demonstrated less toxicity, especially PSN, when shortening treatment duration to 3 months. However, formally, the anticipated non-inferiority of 3 months with fluoropyrimidine (FP)/oxaliplatin over 6 months (at 3-yr DFS) was not met for all patients groups, although subgroup analyses showed non-inferiority with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CAPOX) rather than with FOLFOX, and also in relation to the prognostic information (e.g., clinical low-risk group, pT1-3 N0). In addition, first data of newer parameters like Immunoscore® and ctDNA show promising results as stratification parameters. Further investigations to better define clinical risk groups and prognostic factors are mandatory. Besides this, individual decision-making of treatment intensity (FP or FP/oxaliplatin) and duration should always consider patient characteristics and preferences, also given the absolute relatively small differences and their clinical relevance.

Colonoscopic screening is associated with reduced Colorectal Cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

It is the great priority to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) as early as possible, finally to reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, although colonoscopy is recommended in many consensuses, yet no one systematic review is conducted to figure out how colonoscopy could change the incidence and mortality. In our study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the association between colonoscopy screening and the incidence or mortality of CRC. PubMed, EMBASE, and PMC database were systematically searched from their inception to June 2020. A total of 13 cohort and 16 case-control studies comprising 4,713,778 individuals were obtained in this review. Our results showed that colonoscopy was associated with a 52% RR reduction in incidence of CRC (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.46-0.49) and 62% RR reduction in mortality of CRC (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.36-0.40). Subgroup analysis of different interventions, study design, country, sample size, age or sex showed that the incidence and mortality reduction remained consistent, and colonoscopy screening had the same effect on people below and above 50. Our study indicated that colonoscopy could significantly reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC.

Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Nanoplatforms for Colorectal Cancer Therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease worldwide, and patients at late stages of CRC often suffer from a high mortality rate after surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapeutics (ACs) have been extensively developed to improve the survival rate of such patients, but conventionally formulated ACs inevitably distribute toxic chemotherapeutic drugs to healthy organs and thus often trigger severe side effects. CRC cells may also develop drug resistance following repeat dosing of conventional ACs, limiting their effectiveness. Given these limitations, researchers have sought to use targeted drug delivery systems (DDSs), specifically the nanotechnology-based DDSs, to deliver the ACs. As lipid-based nanoplatforms have shown the potential to improve the efficacy and safety of various cytotoxic drugs (such as paclitaxel and vincristine) in the clinical treatment of gastric cancer and leukemia, the preclinical progress of lipid-based nanoplatforms has attracted increasing interest. The lipid-based nanoplatforms might be the most promising DDSs to succeed in entering a clinical trial for CRC treatment. This review will briefly examine the history of preclinical research on lipid-based nanoplatforms, summarize the current progress, and discuss the challenges and prospects of using such approaches in the treatment of CRC.

Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II or III colon cancer: experiences from a multicentre clinical trial in China

Since January 2020, the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease designated covid-19 by the World Health Organization, a human-to-human contagious viral pneumonia that began in 2019, has been extensively influencing daily life in China[...]