Association of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens With Overall Survival Among Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Transplant

How we treat mantle cell lymphoma with cellular therapy in 2025: the European and American perspectives

Cellular therapies have been cornerstones of the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) for decades and have helped to improve the outcome of this formerly very unfavourable B-cell lymphoma considerably. Current established roles of cellular therapies include autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as part of first-line therapy, chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T-cells (CART) for relapsed/refractory MCL, and allogeneic HCT for settings in which CARTs have failed or are unavailable. Therapeutic innovations have recently entered the MCL treatment landscape and are moving upstream in treatment algorithms, challenging the existing management principles. The purpose of this paper is to give some guidance regarding how to best use cellular therapies in this increasingly complex environment. Due to differences in CART labels, available non-cellular treatment options, and philosophy between the American and the European health systems, we found it reasonable to contrast the American and European perspectives on defined standard scenarios, which are often overlapping but show discrepancies in some important aspects.

Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine conditioning regimen for adult patients with lymphoid malignancies undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a study on behalf of GETH-TC

The efficacy of thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF) conditioning in lymphoproliferative disorders remains under investigation. We analyzed outcomes in 157 patients with lymphoid malignancies who underwent a first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) following TBF conditioning. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years reached 32%, while the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 19%. At 3 years, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 49.7%, 58.0%, and 44.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade III-IV acute GVHD at 100 days and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD at 3 years were 8.3% and 12%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients receiving high-dose thiotepa (10 mg/kg) demonstrated a significantly lower CIR than those receiving low-dose thiotepa (5 mg/kg) (HR 2.95 [95% CI, 1.37-6.33], p = 0.006), with no significant effect on NRM. Female donor-to-male recipient transplants were associated with reduced OS (HR 2.0 [95% CI, 1.17-3.44], p = 0.011) and increased NRM (HR 2.43 [95% CI, 1.29-4.35], p = 0.005). TBF conditioning demonstrated a substantial anti-tumor effect, counterbalanced by elevated toxicity. Careful patient selection and effective toxicity mitigation strategies are essential to ensure individuals can tolerate TBF's toxicity while maximizing its benefits in disease control.

Outcomes in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma refractory or intolerant to brentuximab vedotin and anti-PD-1 therapy: a real world analysis from 15 U.S. academic centers

Anti-PD-1 based therapies and brentuximab vedotin (BV) have significantly improved survival in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and have been incorporated into earlier lines of therapy. However, there is insufficient data regarding the clinical outcomes in patients who develop refractory disease or who become intolerant of BV and anti-PD-1 therapies (double refractory/intolerant; DR/INT). Here, we evaluated outcomes in patients with DR/INT cHL from 15 US academic medical centers. A total of 173 patients were identified as DR/INT. The median overall survival from the time of cHL diagnosis (OS-1) was 14.8 years (95% CI: 10.9-20.9 years) and the 10-year OS-1 estimate was 62% (95% CI: 52-70%). After accounting for differences in age, patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplant prior to developing DR/INT had significantly longer OS-1 (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.96, p = 0.04). Median OS from time of DR/INT (OS-2) was 7.4 years (95% CI: 4.3-NR) and the 5-year OS-2 estimate was 57% (95% CI: 48-66%). Both anti-PD-1 and BV based therapy rechallenge were effective with median PFS of 237 days (95% CI: 155-357 days) and 183 days (95% CI: 108-273 days), respectively. Finally, advanced therapy options such as CD30 directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplant after DR/INT were associated with improved OS-2 (p < 0.001). To our knowledge, this represents the largest cohort of patients with DR/INT cHL. OS-2 will serve as a benchmark for future studies aiming to improve survival in DR/INT cHL.

Fludarabine Plus Myeloablative Dose of Busulfan Regimen Was Associated with High Nonrelapse Mortality in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Malignant Lymphoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison Study with Fludarabine Plus High-Dose Melphalan

In recent years, there have been notable advancements in the treatment of malignant lymphoma. However, a certain percentage of patients are unlikely to achieve a cure through chemotherapy alone. Therefore, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a crucial curative treatment for malignant lymphoma. FluBu4, comprising fludarabine (Flu) combined with a myeloablative dose of intravenous busulfan (Bu; 12.8 mg/kg in total), is a widely used conditioning regimen for allo-HSCT, but its usefulness in malignant lymphoma (ML) has not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FluBu4 in allo-HSCT for lymphoma by comparing the outcomes of two conditioning regimens: FluBu4 and FluMel140. We used a Japanese national database from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program to retrospectively analyze the first allo-HSCT for ML in patients aged ≥16 years. Allo-HSCT cases treated with posttransplant cyclophosphamide were excluded. Two groups, namely FluBu4 and FluMel140 were selected by propensity score matching (PSM) with a case ratio of 1:2. From 921 cases, 113 were selected by PSM for the FluBu4 group and 226 for the FluMel140 group. The median age was 54 (19 to 68) years, the median observation period of survivors was 33.8 months, and 145 (42.7%) had a history of autologous HSCT. There were no significant differences in patients' backgrounds between the two groups after PSM. Three-year overall survival (OS) was significantly worse for FluBu4 than for FluMel140 (28.0% versus 48.6%; P < .01). The 3-year cumulative relapse rate was comparable for FluBu4 and FluMel140 (40.1% versus 38.5%; P = .65). However, 3-year nonrelapse mortality was significantly higher for FluBu4 than for FluMel140 (35.3% versus 22.5%; P = .02). There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at day 100 after allo-HSCT and the 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. While the common and major cause of death was the relapse of lymphoma, aGVHD, and noninfectious lung complications were observed more frequently with FluBu4 than with FluMel140. One-year cumulative incidence of interstitial pneumonia was significantly higher for FluBu4 than for FluMel140 (5.3% versus 0.4%; P = .03). FluBu4 use was associated with worse nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and OS in allo-HSCT for ML compared with FluBu4 and FluMel140 adjusted by PSM. Patients treated with FluBu4 had a higher incidence of noninfectious pulmonary complications and an increased number of associated deaths. A higher rate of NRM in the patients treated with FluBu4 was particularly evident in patients aged ≥60, and its use should be avoided in this patient population.

When to use stem cell transplantation for classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare hematologic malignancy with a bimodal distribution of incidence, with most patients diagnosed between the ages of 15 and 30 years and another peak in patients older than 55 years. It is estimated that in 2023, almost 9000 people were diagnosed with HL in the United States. Most patients will be cured using conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The treatment of HL has changed significantly over the past decade following the approval of highly effective novel therapies, including brentuximab vedotin and the checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. The increasing use of these novel therapies has resulted in decreased utilization of both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with HL. In this review, we discuss the role of stem cell transplantation in patients with HL, with a particular focus on recent data supporting allogeneic HCT as a curative option in patients who progress on or are intolerant to CPI treatment.

ASTCT and USCLC Clinical Practice Recommendations for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the most common subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). While MF generally follows an indolent course, a subset of patients will experience progressive and/or treatment-refractory disease; Sézary syndrome is an aggressive lymphoma associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is the only currently available potentially curative treatment modality for MF/SS there is no published guidance on referral criteria, transplant timing orallo-HCT approach. To develop consensus clinical practice recommendations, we performed a Delphi survey of 32 specialists in dermatology (n = 9), transplant hematology/oncology (n = 10), non-transplant hematology/oncology (n = 8), and radiation oncology (n = 5) from across the United States. Consensus required agreement of ≥75% of participants. Sixteen consensus statements were generated on four topics: (1) criteria for referral for consideration for allo-HCT, (2) allo-HCT preparative regimens and procedures (3) disease status at the time of allo-HCT, and (4) multidisciplinary management in the pre- and post-transplant settings. These clinical practice guidelines provide a framework for decision-making regarding allo-HCT for MF/SS and highlight areas for future prospective investigation.

High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous or Allogeneic Transplantation in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma-Is There Still a Role?

Novel therapies such as CAR-T, BTK inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors have changed the management of aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Nonetheless, these novel therapies have their own risk of late toxicities including second malignancies. They also create a subgroup of patients with relapse, treatment failure, or indefinite maintenance. We discuss the current role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in this context. In patients with recurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, CAR-T cell treatment has largely replaced autologous transplant. Autologous transplant should be considered in patients with late relapses and in selected patients with T-cell-rich B-cell lymphoma, where CAR-T cell therapy may be less effective. It also remains the treatment of choice for consolidation of patients with primary CNS lymphoma. In mantle cell lymphoma, intensive chemotherapy combined with BTK inhibitors and rituximab results in excellent outcomes, and the role of autologous transplantation is declining. In Hodgkin's lymphoma, autologous transplant consolidation remains the standard of care for patients who failed initial chemotherapy. Allogeneic transplantation has lower relapse rates but more complications and higher non-relapse mortality than autologous transplantation. It is usually reserved for patients who fail autologous transplantation or in whom autologous stem cells cannot be collected. It may also have an important role in patients who fail CAR-T therapies. The increasing complexity of care and evolving sequencing of therapies for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas only emphasizes the importance of appropriate patient selection and optimal timing of stem cell transplantation.

Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/busulfan versus fludarabine/low-dose melphalan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens are commonly used in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, the optimal regimen remains unknown. In this study, the outcomes of adult patients with NHL who received fludarabine plus reduced-dose busulfan (6.4 mg/kg; Flu/Bu2) (n = 286) and fludarabine plus low-dose melphalan (80 or 100 mg/m2; Flu/Mel80-100) (n = 283) between January 2009 and December 2020 were compared using Japanese registry data. The primary end-point was the 5-year overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS was 53.8% (95% CI, 47.6-59.6) and 42.4% (95% CI, 35.6-49.0) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Mel80-100 groups respectively (p = 0.030). After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the adjusted HR of Flu/Bu2 compared with Flu/Mel80-100 group for 5-year OS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99, p = 0.046), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.78-1.21, p = 0.798) for 5-year progression-free survival, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94, p = 0.022) for 5-year cumulative risk of non-relapse mortality and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.95-1.64, p = 0.115) for 5-year cumulative risk of relapse. In this study, patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 were associated with better OS and lower non-relapse mortality than those who received Flu/Mel80-100.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for DLBCL: a report from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation on more than 40,000 patients over 32 years

Autologous(auto-) and allogeneic(allo-) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are key treatments for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), although their roles are challenged by CAR-T-cells and other immunotherapies. We examined the transplantation trends and outcomes for DLBCL patients undergoing auto-/allo-HSCT between 1990 and 2021 reported to EBMT. Over this period, 41,148 patients underwent auto-HSCT, peaking at 1911 cases in 2016, while allo-HSCT saw a maximum of 294 cases in 2018. The recent decline in transplants corresponds to increased CAR-T treatments (1117 cases in 2021). Median age for auto-HSCT rose from 42 (1990-1994) to 58 years (2015-2021), with peripheral blood becoming the primary stem cell source post-1994. Allo-HSCT median age increased from 36 (1990-1994) to 54 (2015-2021) years, with mobilized blood as the primary source post-1998 and reduced intensity conditioning post-2000. Unrelated and mismatched allo-HSCT accounted for 50% and 19% of allo-HSCT in 2015-2021. Three-year overall survival (OS) after auto-HSCT improved from 56% (1990-1994) to 70% (2015-2021), p < 0.001, with a decrease in relapse incidence (RI) from 49% to 38%, while non-relapse mortality (NRM) remained unchanged (4%). After allo-HSCT, 3-year-OS increased from 33% (1990-1999) to 46% (2015-2021) (p < 0.001); 3-year RI remained at 39% and 1-year-NRM decreased to 19% (p < 0.001). Our data reflect advancements over 32 years and >40,000 transplants, providing insights for evaluating emerging DLBCL therapies.

Impact of waitlist time on post-HSCT survival: a cohort study at a hospital in southern Brazil

INTRODUCTION

The time elapsed from diagnosis to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is influenced by numerous factors. In Brazil, patients using the public health system are also dependent on the availability of HSCT-specific beds in the hematology ward.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of listed patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT at a Brazilian public hospital to investigate the impact of the waitlist time on post-HSCT survival.

RESULTS

The median time from diagnosis to HSCT was 19 months (IQR, 10 - 43), of which 6 months (IQR, 3 - 9) were spent on the waitlist. The time on the waitlist for HSCT appeared to influence mainly the survival of adult patients (≥ 18 years), with an increasing risk according to this time (RR, 3.53 and 95%CI, 1.81 - 6.88 for > 3 and ≤ 6 months; RR 5.86 and 95%CI, 3.26 - 10.53 for > 6 and ≤ 12 months, and; RR 4.24 and 95%CI, 2.32 - 7.75 for > 12 months).

CONCLUSION

Patients who remained on the waitlist for less than 3 months had the highest survival (median survival, 856 days; IQR, 131 - 1607). The risk of reduced survival was about 6-fold higher (95%CI, 2.8 - 11.5) in patients with malignancies.

Therapeutic options for large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy

In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for large B cell lymphoma (LBCL), demonstrating remarkable efficacy and ushering a new era of therapeutic possibilities. However, a subset of patients may not achieve the desired response with CAR T. This review examines strategies aimed at optimizing outcomes for patients who relapse or progress after CAR T. Available data on utilization of CD19-directed monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates have shown limited efficacy in this setting. Moreover, bispecific antibodies have also emerged as an alternative therapy in relapsed and or refractory LBCL, but long-term follow up treated cases post-CAR T failure are lacking. Several observational studies have shown efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, but attainment of a complete remission prior to allografting is a prerequisite to achieve durable remissions. As we navigate the intricate landscape of treatment of post CAR T failure, it becomes evident that this represents a therapeutic challenge which necessitates a multifaceted approach.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant for treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) has been noted to be a potential curative treatment in cases of advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sezary syndrome (SS). To assess outcomes of allo-HSCT for MF/SS we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis including 15 manuscripts and 557 patients, published from 2010-2023. Meta-analysis revealed 1-year and 3+year overall survival (OS) of 51% (95% CI 39-64%) and 40% (32-49%). Progression-free survival at 1 year and 3+years were 42% (31-53%) and 33% (25-42%). Non-relapse mortality was 18% (13-23%). Relapse occurred in of 47% (40-53%) with a median time to relapse of 7.9 months (range 1.6-24 months). Rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 45% (35-55%) and 40% (33-48%). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) was associated with superior OS compared to myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (58% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Of patients with relapse after allo-HSCT, 46% treated with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) achieved complete remission. These data support use of allo-HSCT for treatment of advanced-stage MF/SS and suggest superiority of RIC over MAC. Rates of GVHD were comparable to allo-HSCT in general. The improved OS for RIC and high rate of CR with DLI underscore the importance of the graft-versus-lymphoma effect in allo-HSCT for MF/SS.

Reduced-Intensity Compared to Nonmyeloablative Conditioning in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning are preferred for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although prior studies have suggested that higher-intensity regimens in RIC-NMA conditioning are associated with inferior outcomes in patients with NHL, the optimal conditioning regimen remains unknown. We performed a retrospective single-center analysis to determine outcomes of adult patients with B cell and T cell NHL who underwent allo-HCT and received either RIC or NMA conditioning between March 2008 and December 2019. RIC regimens included fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-thiotepa-4 Gy-total body irradiation (Flu-Cy-TT-4Gy-TBI), fludarabine-melphalan (Flu-Mel), fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-4 Gy-total body irradiation (Flu-Cy-4Gy-TBI), and fludarabine-busulfan-4 (Flu-Bu-4). The NMA regimen comprised fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-2 Gy-total body irradiation (Flu-Cy-2Gy-TBI). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Of 279 transplants recipients (median age, 58 years), 110 received RIC (55% Flu-Mel, 38% Flu-Cy-TT-4Gy-TBI, 6% Flu-Bu-4, 1% Flu-Cy-4Gy-TBI) and 169 received NMA conditioning with Flu-Cy-2Gy-TBI. With a median of 64 months of follow-up post-allo-HCT, there was no significant difference in OS between the NMA and RIC groups (median, not reached [NR] versus 103 months; P = .1), and this was maintained on multivariable analysis. Similarly, after adjustment for all independently significant covariates (age, Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS], Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index [HCT-CI], and disease histology), the regression analysis showed no significant difference in PFS with RIC compared to NMA conditioning (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], .92 to 2.09; P = .24). On univariable analysis, there was no significant difference in NRM between the RIC and NMA arms (100-day estimate, 10.0% versus 1.8%; P = .5). After adjustment for age, ethnicity, KPS, HCT-CI, GVHD prophylaxis, and donor source, RIC conditioning was associated with a significantly higher incidence of NRM compared to NMA conditioning (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.04 to 6.52; P = .039). On multivariable analysis, compared with the NMA arm, the RIC arm had higher rates of grade II-IV (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.86; P = .002) and grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 5.62; 95% CI, 2.03 to 15.6; P < .001). The findings of this study suggest that NMA conditioning with Flu-Cy-TBI-2Gy may be considered over more intensive RIC regimens for patients with NHL undergoing allo-HCT.

Busulfan and subsequent malignancy: An evidence-based risk assessment

BACKGROUND

The incidence of secondary malignancies associated with busulfan exposure is considered low, but has been poorly characterized. Because this alkylating agent is increasingly utilized as conditioning prior to gene therapy in nonmalignant hematologic and related disorders, more precise characterization of busulfan's potential contribution to subsequent malignant risk is warranted.

PROCEDURE

We conducted a literature-based assessment of busulfan and subsequent late effects, with emphasis on secondary malignancies, identifying publications via PubMed searches, and selecting those reporting at least 3 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified eight pediatric and 13 adult publications describing long-term follow-up in 570 pediatric and 2076 adult hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. Secondary malignancies were reported in 0.5% of pediatric HCT recipients, with no cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myelocytic leukemia (AML). Fatal secondary malignancies were reported in 0.8% of 1887 evaluable adult HCT recipients, and an overall incidence of secondary malignancies of 4.8% was reported in a subset of 389 evaluable adult patients. We also reviewed long-term results from eight publications evaluating lentiviral- and human promotor-based HSC-targeted gene therapy in 215 patients with nonmalignant conditions, in which busulfan/treosulfan monotherapy or busulfan/fludarabine was the only conditioning. Two malignancies were reported in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), one of which was potentially busulfan-related. No additional malignancies were reported in 173 patients with follow-up of 5-12 years.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of busulfan-related secondary malignancies is low, and likely to be substantially less than 1% in pediatric transplant recipients, especially those receiving busulfan monotherapy for nonmalignant conditions other than SCD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for B-cell lymphoma in Taiwan

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered for patients with high-risk B-cell lymphoma and relapsed or refractory disease. This study aimed to analyze the long-term follow-up data of patients who underwent allo-HSCT in Taiwan. This was a retrospective observational study using data from the Taiwan Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation database. A total of 105 patients who underwent allo-HSCT because of high-risk, relapsed, or refractory disease between 2010 and 2019 were included. Forty-five percent of the patients previously underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The median follow-up duration was 18.6 months. The probability of 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) was 34.5% and 37%, respectively. The probability of 1-year non-relapse mortality was 31.4%, and the major cause was infection (75.8%). The multivariable analysis showed that not in remission at the time of transplantation and the absence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were factors associated with inferior OS. The probability of 3-year OS in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who underwent allo-HSCT and allo-HSCT after ASCT was 40.2% and 25.2%, respectively. Allo-HSCT could be a salvage therapeutic option for relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma. Complete remission at the time of allo-HSCT and the presence of GVHD are independent variables for overall survival.

ASTCT Clinical Practice Recommendations for Transplantation and Cellular Therapies in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has long been the standard approach for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chemosensitive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has caused a paradigm shift in the management of R/R DLBCL patients, especially with the recent approval of CD19-directed CAR-T therapy in the second-line setting in high-risk groups (primary refractory and early relapse [≤12 months]). Consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT and cellular therapies in DLBCL is lacking; therefore, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines undertook this project to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 20 consensus statements with a few key statements as follows: (1) in the first-line setting, there is no role for auto-HCT consolidation for patients achieving complete remission (CR) following R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone) or similar therapy in non-double-hit/triple-hit cases (DHL/THL) and in DHL/THL cases receiving intensive induction therapies, but auto-HCT may be considered in eligible patients receiving R-CHOP or similar therapies in DHL/THL cases; (2) auto-HCT consolidation with thiotepa-based conditioning is standard of care for eligible patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma achieving CR with first-line therapy; and (3) in the primary refractory and early relapse setting, the preferred option is CAR-T therapy, whereas in late relapse (>12 months), consolidation with auto-HCT is recommended for patients achieving chemosensitivity to salvage therapy (complete or partial response), and CAR-T therapy is recommended for those not achieving remission. These clinical practice recommendations will serve as a tool to guide clinicians managing patients with newly diagnosed and R/R DLBCL.

Cardiovascular events among recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cardiovascular diseases are an emerging cause of mortality and morbidity in survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); however, the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in this population is not well described. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on the incidence of CVEs in HSCT recipients. Medline and Embase were searched from inception to December 2020. Inclusion criteria were cohort studies and phase 3 randomized controlled trials that reported CVEs among adults who underwent HSCT for hematological malignancies. After reviewing 8386 citations, 57 studies were included. The incidence of CVEs at 100 days was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17-0.21) per 100 person-days after autologous HSCT and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.05-0.07) per 100 person-days after allogeneic HSCT. This higher incidence after autologous HSCT was driven by reports of arrhythmia from one population-based study in patients with multiple myeloma. The incidence of long-term CVEs was 3.98 (95% CI; 3.44-4.63) per 1000 person-years in survivors of autologous HSCT and 3.06 (95% CI; 2.69-3.48) per 1000 person-years in survivors of allogeneic HSCT. CVEs remain an important but under-reported cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of HSCT. Future studies are required to better understand the incidence and risk factors for CVEs in HSCT recipients.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Large B Cell Lymphoma

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the care of patients with relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, approximately 60% of CAR-T recipients ultimately will experience disease recurrence or progression. Salvage therapies after CAR-T treatment failures are of limited efficacy and have a short duration of response. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) after CAR-T therapy in LBCL patients. This was a multicenter observational study reporting the outcome of 39 adult LBCL patients who underwent allo-HCT following anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy. The median patient age was 47 years (range, 20 to 68 years). HLA-matched sibling, HLA-matched unrelated, and alternative donors were used in 36%, 36%, and 28% of transplantations, respectively. Conditioning regimens were primarily of low or intermediate intensity. Disease status at allo-HCT was complete response in 41%, partial response in 38%, and progressive disease in 21%. Allo-HCT was performed at a median of 127 days (range, 82 to 206 days) after CAR-T therapy. A high incidence of hepatic toxicity (28%), including sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (15.4%; 95% confidence interval; [CI], 6.2% to 28.5%), was observed. The 1-year cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 38.5% (95% CI, 23.2% to 53.6%) and 15.4% (95% CI, 6.1% to 28.5%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was 11.1% (95% CI, 3.3% to 24.3%). Overall, 2-year nonrelapse mortality and relapse/progression incidence were 26% (95% CI, 13% to 41%) and 43% (95% CI, 27% to 59%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 45% (95% CI, 31% to 66%) and 31% (95% CI, 19% to 50%), respectively. In multivariable analyses, pre-HCT elevated lactate dehydrogenase level and transformed lymphoma were predictive of OS and PFS, respectively. Our data suggest that allo-HCT after anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment failure is feasible with a relatively promising efficacy but possibly high toxicity rate.

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A review

Although the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has declined with the development of novel targeted agents, it continues to play an important role for eligible patients with high-risk or heavily pretreated CLL who lack other treatment options. CLL is susceptible to a potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect which produces long-lasting remissions in 30-50% of transplanted patients. While allogeneic HCT is associated with significant risks of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), infection, and non-relapse mortality (NRM), improvements in patient and donor selection, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care have rendered this an increasingly safe and effective procedure in the current era. In this review, we discuss recent advances in allogeneic HCT for CLL, with a focus on the optimal evidence-based strategies to maximize benefit and minimize toxicity of this potentially curative cellular therapy.

Impact of conditioning regimen intensity on the outcomes of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma patients undergoing allogeneic transplant

There have been no large studies comparing reduced-intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) to myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (T-NHL) patients undergoing allogeneic transplant (allo-HCT). A total of 803 adults with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (age 18-65 years), undergoing allo-HCT between 2008-2019 and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research with either MAC (n = 258) or RIC/NMA regimens (n = 545) were evaluated. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in terms of patient sex, race and performance scores. Significantly more patients in the RIC/NMA cohort had peripheral blood grafts, haematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) of ≥3 and chemosensitive disease compared to the MAC cohort. On multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was not significantly different in the RIC/NMA cohort compared to the MAC cohort (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-1.29; p = 0.95). Similarly, non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.61-1.19; p = 0.34), risk of progression/relapse (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.98-1.70; p = 0.07) and therapy failure (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.92-1.41, p = 0.23) were not significantly different between the two cohorts. Relative to MAC, RIC/NMA was associated with a significantly lower risk of grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.46-0.99, p = 0.04). Among chemorefractory patients, there was no difference in OS, therapy failure, relapse, or NRM between RIC/NMA and MAC regimens. In conclusion, we found no association between conditioning intensity and outcomes after allo-HCT for T-cell NHL.

Allogeneic transplant and CAR-T therapy after autologous transplant failure in DLBCL: a noncomparative cohort analysis

Allogeneic transplant (alloHCT) and chimeric antigen receptor modified (CAR)-T cell therapy are potentially cuarative options of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after an autologous (auto)HCT. Although the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) prognostic model can predict outcomes of alloHCT in DLBCL after autoHCT failure, corresponding models of CAR-T treatment in similar patient populations are not available. In this noncomparative registry analysis, we report outcomes of patients with DLBCL (≥18 years) undergoing a reduced intensity alloHCT or CAR-T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel during 2012 to 2019 after a prior auto-HCT failure and apply the CIBMTR prognostic model to CAR-T recipients. A total of 584 patients were included. The 1-year relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival for CAR-T treatment after autoHCT failure were 39.5%, 4.8%, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates in the alloHCT cohort were 26.2%, 20.0%, 65.6%, and 53.8%, respectively. The 1-year OS of alloHCT recipients classified as low-, intermediate- and high/very high-risk groups according to the CIBMTR prognostic score was 73.3%, 59.9%, and 46.3%, respectively (P = .002). The corresponding rates for low-, intermediate-, and high/very high-risk CAR-T patients were 88.4%, 76.4%, and 52.8%, respectively (P < .001). This registry analysis shows that both CAR-T and alloHCT can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with DLBCL relapsing after a prior autoHCT. The simple CIBMTR prognostic score can be used to identify patients at high risk of treatment failure after either procedure. Evaluation of novel relapse mitigations strategies after cellular immunotherapies are warranted in these high-risk patients.

Double-refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: tackling relapse after brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors

The approval of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has revolutionized the management of relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients. In recent years these agents have rapidly moved to earlier lines of therapy, including post-autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) consolidation, pre-HCT salvage, and the frontline treatment setting. This shift in practice means that double-refractory (refractory to both BV and CPI) cHL is becoming an increasingly common clinical problem. In patients who are not eligible for clinical trials, conventional cytotoxic and targeted therapies (off label) may be a potential option. In patients who are transplant eligible, early referral to allogeneic HCT should be considered given the significant improvement in transplant outcomes in the contemporary era. Cellular therapy options including CD30.chimeric antigen receptor T cells, Epstein-Barr virus-directed cytotoxic T cells, and CD16A/30 bispecific natural killer cell engagers appear promising and are currently in clinical trials.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in T-cell lymphoma: a Meta-Analysis

T-cell lymphoma (TCL) poses a therapeutic challenge. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is frequently offered in primary refractory disease or failed autologous transplant. We systematically searched published articles on outcomes of alloSCT in TCL through PubMed and EMBASE database between January 2000 and October 2019. Among 651 identified studies, 22 (888 patients) were included. Forty percent patients had peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, 15% had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, 21% had anaplastic large cell lymphoma, 5% had cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and 19% had other histologic subtypes. Thirty-six percent patients had relapsed/refractory disease. Myeloablative conditioning regimens were used in 55% patients. At two-, three- and five-year post-transplant, overall survival was 57, 54 and 51%, respectively; progression-free survival was 45, 50 and 45%, respectively; non-relapse mortality was 9, 29 and 29%, respectively; relapse rate was 30, 28 and 29%, respectively. Our study shows that alloSCT provides durable remission in T cell lymphoma.

Outcome of Allogeneic Transplantation for Mature T-cell Lymphomas: Impact of Donor Source and Disease Characteristics

OS (3-year) of patients with TCL getting haplo-HCT or MSD, MUD TCD+, or MUD TCD− allo-HCT was 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%, respectively.

PFS (3-year) of patients with TCL getting haplo-HCT or MSD, MUD TCD+, or MUD TCD− allo-HCT is 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively.

Mature T-cell lymphomas constitute the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) of all lymphomas. Large studies evaluating contemporary outcomes of allo-HCT in mature T-cell lymphomas relative to commonly used donor sources are not available. Included in this registry study were adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) between 2008 and 2018. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) platforms compared were posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical (haplo-)HCT, matched sibling donor (MSD) HCT, matched unrelated donor HCT with in vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD+), and matched unrelated donor HCT without in vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD−). Coprimary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse/progression incidence (RI). A total of 1942 patients were eligible (237 haplo-HCT; 911 MSD; 468 MUD TCD+; 326 MUD TCD−). Cohorts were comparable for baseline characteristics with the exception of higher proportions of patients with decreased performance status (PS) and marrow graft recipients in the haplo-HCT group. Using univariate and multivariate comparisons, OS, PFS, RI, and NRM were not significantly different among the haplo-HCT, MSD, MUD TCD+, and MUD TCD− cohorts, with 3-year OS and PFS of 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%, respectively, and 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. Significant predictors of inferior OS and PFS on multivariate analysis were active disease status at HCT and decreased PS. AITL was associated with significantly reduced relapse risk and better PFS compared with PTCL-NOS. Allo-HCT can provide durable PFS in patients with mature T-cell lymphoma (TCL). Outcomes of haplo-HCT were comparable to those of matched donor allo-HCT.

Immunotherapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Current Landscape and Future Directions

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy has played a pivotal role in the management of relapsed DLBCL. Stem cell transplant and CAR T-cell therapy are curative treatment modalities for relapsed disease. Despite this, a subset of patients continues to progress, and their outcomes remain dismal. Newer therapeutic options to optimize outcomes as well as minimize toxicity are warranted.

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease. B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway is essential for malignant B-cell growth, survival, and proliferation. Various immune cells, including T-cells and macrophages in the tumor microenvironment (TME) contribute to tumor cell survival and pathogenesis of chemo-resistance. The presence of many targets on the malignant B-cells and in the TME has led to emergence of novel therapeutic agents. Stem cell transplant is the oldest treatment modality leveraging immune system in DLBCL. Subsequently, CD20 targeting monoclonal antibody and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy changed the treatment landscape of DLBCL. Recently, multiple novel immunotherapeutic agents have been added in the armamentarium for the management of DLBCL, and many are under development. In this review article, we will review latest updates of immunotherapeutic agents in the management of DLBCL.

Increased early mortality after fludarabine and melphalan conditioning with peripheral blood grafts in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide

Due to the evolving use of haploidentical donor grafts in hematopoietic cell transplantation, there is increased need to better understand the risks and benefits of using bone marrow versus peripheral blood grafts, as well as how specific pre-transplantation conditioning regimens impact patient safety and treatment outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 38 patients at two centers who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation using fludarabine plus melphalan-based conditioning regimens with post-transplant cyclophosphamide and peripheral blood donor grafts. We observed an unexpectedly high rate of early non-relapse mortality and severe cytokine release syndrome. The poor outcomes with 1-year overall survival of 34%, disease-free survival of 29%, and non-relapse mortality of 34% motivate us to reconsider the appropriateness of the combination of fludarabine and melphalan conditioning with T-cell replete peripheral blood grafts in the setting of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant with post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-type Richter syndrome

Richter syndrome (RS) represents a transformation from chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) to aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which is associated with a dismal prognosis. Patients with DLBCL-RS have poor outcomes with DLBCL-directed therapy; thus, consolidation with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been used, with durable remissions observed. Studies reporting HCT outcomes in patients with DLBCL-RS have been small, have not evaluated the prognostic impact of cytogenetic risk factors, and were conducted prior to the era of novel targeted therapy of CLL/SLL. We performed a Center for International Blood and Transplant Research registry study evaluating outcomes after autologous HCT (auto-HCT; n = 53) and allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT; n = 118) in patients with DLBCL-RS treated in the modern era. More auto-HCT recipients were in complete response (CR) at HCT relative to allo-HCT recipients (66% vs 34%), whereas a higher proportion of allo-HCT recipients had 17p deletion (33% vs 7%) and had previously received novel agents (39% vs 10%). In the auto-HCT cohort, the 3-year relapse incidence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 37%, 48%, and 57%, respectively. Among allo-HCT recipients, the 3-year relapse incidence, PFS, and OS were 30%, 43%, and 52%, respectively. In the allo-HCT cohort, deeper response at HCT was associated with outcomes (3-year PFS/OS, 66%/77% CR vs 43%/57% partial response vs 5%/15% resistant; P < .0001 for both), whereas cytogenetic abnormalities and prior novel therapy did not impact outcomes. In our study, HCT resulted in durable remissions in therapy-sensitive patients with DLBCL-RS treated in the era of targeted CLL/SLL therapy, including patients with high-risk features.

Reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Richter's transformation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may potentially cure patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and Richter's transformation (CLL-RT) or CLL without RT, but the impact of novel agents on HSCT is unclear. CLL-RT patients have a grave prognosis, and their outcomes after HSCT are uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all 58 CLL patients, including 23 CLL-RT patients, who underwent reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) between September 2006 and April 2017. With a median follow-up of 68 months (range, 24-147 months), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28%-56%), and overall survival (OS) was 58% (95% CI, 48%-74%). The 1-year graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 38% (95% CI, 25%-50%). Patients with CLL-RT and CLL patients without RT had comparable outcomes. In both cohorts, treatment-sensitive response and ≤3 previous lines of therapy produced superior PFS and OS. Outcomes were agnostic to adverse cytogenetic and molecular features. Novel agents did not have a negative impact on HSCT outcomes. Total body irradiation (TBI)-containing RIC yielded inferior PFS, OS, and GRFS. CLL-RT patients older than age 55 years who had an HSCT Comorbidity Index score of ≥2 demonstrated inferior OS. This study, which is the largest series of RIC-HSCT for patients with CLL-RT, provides evidence supporting RIC-HSCT in early remission courses for patients with CLL-RT and poor-risk CLL patients. TBI-containing RIC should be considered with caution.

Outcomes of Fludarabine, Melphalan and Total Body Irradiation as a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen in Matched Donor Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Fludarabine 30 mg/m²/d × 5 and melphalan 140 mg/m² × 1 (Flu-Mel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We hypothesized that addition of 200cGy total body irradiation (TBI) to Flu-Mel140 may improve antitumor activity and transplant outcomes. Primary objectives was overall survival (OS) at 3 years. Secondary objectives were to assess the cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients receiving Flu-Mel140-TBI followed by HLA-matched donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) using peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-one patients (median age, 58 years) underwent alloSCT between January 2008 and December 2018. Thirty-one percent of patients had a prior transplant, 32% had high or very-high disease risk index, and the donor was unrelated in 70% of patients. Grade 3 to 4 regimen-related toxicities were mucositis (37%), cardiac toxicity (17%), and renal toxicity (10%). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at day +100 was 24.7% and chronic GVHD at 1 year was 51.3%. Median follow-up for survival was 6.1 years. At 3 years, OS was 39.81%, RFS was 31.47%, and relapse rate was 30.5%. One-year NRM was 29.9%. Patients undergoing first transplantation experienced improved OS compared with second or beyond (63.08% versus 42.31%, P = .02). After adjusting for disease subtypes, age (≤55 versus 55), comorbidity index (CI), number of transplant and GVHD prophylaxis, multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any survival difference among disease subtypes. High CI (≥3) was predictive of adverse OS and NRM, whereas older age (>55 years) was associated with high NRM. Our study shows that Flu-Mel140-TBI seems feasible and provides durable disease control. Addition of TBI did not appear to improve outcomes compared to previously published reports of Flu-Mel140. Considerable NRM could result from the inclusion of patients with older age and prior transplants.

The evolving role of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in the era of chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has revolutionized the management of many haematological malignancies. It is associated with impressive disease responses in relapsed or refractory high-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) with durable remissions in a subset of patients. Historically, haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been the standard consolidation strategy for many of these patients who are now being treated with CAR T. Relapses are frequent after CD19 CAR T therapy in B-ALL and consolidation with allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) may improve survival of patients with high-risk disease. There appears to be a clear difference in B-ALL outcomes between paediatric and adult patients, with the latter having a much higher risk of relapse after CAR T therapy. Late relapses are infrequent in patients with B-NHL and consolidation with allo-HCT may not be needed in patients who achieve a complete remission after CAR T therapy. Future registry-based and prospective studies will hopefully provide the needed data in the future to risk-stratify the recipients of CAR T therapy. Meanwhile, we provide guidance on patient selection and practical issues with performing allo-HCT after CAR T therapy.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in T Cell and Natural Killer Cell Lymphomas: Update on Recent Advances

Mature T and natural killer (NK) cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (T-NHL) has a poor prognosis. Data from existing retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) may improve the survival in patients with chemosensitive disease, either in the upfront or salvage setting. Auto-HCT is currently recommended to be used as frontline consolidation in peripheral T cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma-anaplastic lymphoma kinase negative, NK/T cell (disseminated), and enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma. However, about one-third of patients never reach transplantation because of early relapse or refractory disease. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), via its immunologic graft-versus-lymphoma effect, has been used to salvage patients with relapsed or refractory disease, resulting in long-term disease-free survival in a fraction of patients. However, the higher risk of transplant-related mortality due to regimen-related toxicities, graft-versus-host disease, and post-transplant infectious complications continues to limit the mainstream adoption of allo-HCT for this disease. Despite that, allo-HCT has been incorporated as part of the frontline treatment for aggressive subtypes of T-NHL, such as γδ T cell lymphoma and aggressive NK cell leukemia. Recent attempts to incorporate novel targeted T cell directed therapies into the treatment pathway of T-NHL may enhance treatment response and enable more patients to reach transplant, offering an alternative means of treating this disease.

Sequential intensive chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic transplantation for refractory lymphoma

We evaluate the safety of bendamustine as a bridge to stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and residual disease after salvage therapy. Thirty-four subjects without complete responses (CR) received bendamustine 200 mg/m²/day for 2 days followed 14 days later by SCT. Sixteen subjects in partial remission (PR) with maximal FDG-PET SUVs ≤8 prior to bendamustine received autologous SCT, while 13 with suboptimal responses were allografted. Five subjects did not proceed to transplant. No bendamustine toxicities precluded transplantation and no detrimental effect on engraftment or early treatment-related mortality (TRM) was attributable to bendamustine. At 1 year, 75% of auto-recipients and 31% of allo-recipients were alive with CR. Two subjects in the autologous arm developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasia (t-MN). In conclusion, a bendamustine bridge to SCT can be administered without early toxicity to patients with suboptimal responses to salvage chemotherapy. However this approach may increase the risk of t-MN. (NCT02059239).Supplemental data for this article is available online at here.

A New Target for Hodgkin Lymphoma - Camidanlumab Tesirine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are limited treatment options for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients who progress on brentuximab vedotin and programmed death-1 inhibitors. Camidanlumab Tesirine (Cami) is a new agent that has shown activity in multiply relapsed/refractory cHL patients. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of Cami.

RECENT FINDINGS

In phase 1 study of Cami in relapsed/refractory cHL and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), Cami was noted to be safe with encouraging clinic activity in multiply relapsed/refractory cHL. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 95% (n = 73 of 77) of patients, while grade 3 TEAEs were reported in 66% (n = 51) of cHL patients. Cami was associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including peripheral sensory neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS)/radiculopathy, colitis, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, thyroiditis, and pneumonitis. The overall response rate (ORR) and complete (CR) rate were 71%/40% in the cHL cohort (n = 75). In the interim analysis of an ongoing phase 2 study in 2020, Cami demonstrated good clinical efficacy with an ORR/CR rate of 83%/38% among the 47 evaluable cHL patients. The toxicity profile was similar to that seen in the phase 1 study, with no new safety signals.. As the phase 2 study with Cami is continuing to accrue patients and we await the final results, the preliminary results with Cami are encouraging and provide an additional therapeutic option especially for patients with multiply relapsed/refractory cHL and perhaps other hematological malignancies expression CD25.

Multicenter Phase II Study on Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation Using a Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen and Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Poor-Prognosis Lymphomas

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation from haploidentical donors using unmanipulated bone marrow and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide has been largely employed to cure high-risk lymphomas. However, the increased incidence of relapse associated with the use of a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen is still considered a concerning issue. The aim of our study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, including thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, and fludarabine, in high-risk lymphoma patients. This was a prospective multicenter study. We enrolled 49 patients, of whom 47 were evaluable. Graft source (bone marrow) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis were the same for all patients. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free of disease progression at 1 year. The primary endpoint was met, as 29 out of 47 patients were alive and free of disease at 1 year (1-year progression-free survival, 60%). Forty-five recipients engrafted and achieved full donor chimerism at day 100. The cumulative incidences (CIs) of ANC engraftment at 30 days and platelet engraftment at 60 days were 89% and 83%, respectively. Two patients experienced graft failure. The CIs of day 100 grades 2 to 4 acute GVHD and 2-year moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were 26% and 16%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 47.5 months (range, 22 to 74), the 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 54% and 64%, respectively. The 4-year CI of relapse was 28%, and the 4-year nonrelapse mortality was 15%. Thiotepa-based reduced-intensity conditioning was well tolerated with encouraging survival in a cohort of patients with poor-prognosis lymphoma. Both the incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were acceptable.

Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphomas-Expectations and Pitfalls

T-cell replete Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an emerging therapeutic option for patients with advanced relapsed or refractory lymphoma. The feasibility of this platform is supported by several retrospective studies showing a toxicity profile that is improved relative to umbilical cord blood and mismatched unrelated donor (UD) transplant and comparable to matched unrelated donor transplant. In particular, cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is reduced after Haplo-SCT relative to UD and matched related donor (MRD) transplant thanks to PT-Cy employed as GVHD prophylaxis. This achievement, together with a similar incidence of acute GVHD and disease relapse, results in a promising advantage of Haplo-SCT in terms of relapse-free/GVHD free survival. Unmet needs of the Haplo-SCT platform are represented by the persistence of a not negligible rate of non-relapse mortality, especially due to infections and disease relapse. Future efforts are warranted in order to reduce life-threatening infections and to employ Halo-SCT with PT-Cy as a platform to build new immunotherapeutic strategies.

Impact of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens on Outcomes in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are frequently used for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the RIC regimen with the best risk/benefit profile for allo-HCT in DLBCL is not known. This is particularly important because patients with DLBCL undergoing allo-HCT in the future would be enriched for those whose lymphoma has failed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy or other novel immunotherapies, with potentially more advanced disease and suboptimal performance scores. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we report the outcomes of the 3 most commonly used allo-HCT RIC regimens in patients with DLBCL. Our analysis included a total of 562 adult DLBCL patients in the CIBMTR registry undergoing allo-HCT using matched related or unrelated donors, between 2008 and 2016. Patients received 1 of 3 RIC regimens: fludarabine/i.v. busulfan ~6.4 mg/kg (Flu/Bu), fludarabine/melphalan 140 mg/m² (Flu/Mel140), or BCNU/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan (BEAM). Accordingly, the study group was divided into 3 groups: Flu/Bu (n = 151), Flu/Mel140 (n = 296), and BEAM (n = 115). Relative to Flu/Bu, the Flu/Mel140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 3.82; P = .001) and BEAM (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.34 to 4.80; P = .004) regimens were associated with a risk of higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Although the risk of relapse with Flu/Mel140 was lower than that with Flu/Bu (HR, .70; 95% CI, .52 to .95; P = .02), this did not translate to improved progression-free survival (HR, 1.04) or overall survival (HR, 1.30). There was a significantly higher risk of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease with BEAM compared with Flu/Bu (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.35; P = .03). In the chemosensitive subset, multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher mortality risk with Flu/Mel140 (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.04; P = .02) relative to Flu/Bu conditioning. In the largest analysis comparing the impact of various RIC regimens on the survival of DLBCL patients undergoing allo-HCT, our results suggest that Flu/Bu is a better RIC choice in less fit or heavily pretreated patients due to lowest NRM risk.