Month 24 Outcomes After Treatment Initiation With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 10: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORE2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Association of Retinal Thickness at Month 1 Post-Treatment with Later Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the association of retinal thickness 1 month post-randomization (1 month after first study injection with aflibercept or bevacizumab) with later retinal thickness, visual acuity, and number of treatments in eyes with central or hemiretinal vein occlusion enrolled in the SCORE2 trial.

DESIGN

Cohort study using data from a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

Analysis included 350 SCORE2 participants through 2 years of follow-up. Main outcome measures are central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography, best-corrected visual acuity letter score (VALS), and number of treatments for macular edema. CST was classified as thin (≤216µm), medium (>216µm and ≤300µm), or thick (>300µm).

RESULTS

At Month 1, 15% (51/350) of study eyes were in the thin CST class, 57% (199/350) in the medium CST class, and 29% (100/350) in the thick CST class. Of eyes with thin CST at Month 1, 89-96% were also thin during Months 2-12. Over all visits studied, the VALS of eyes in the medium Month 1 CST class was significantly greater than the Month 1 thin class. During Months 6-12 (p<0.001) and 12-24 (p <0.001), but not during Months 0-6 (p=0.36) when monthly treatment was protocol-specified, the mean number of treatments for macular edema per study eye was highest in the thick CST class and lowest in the thin CST class. The thin CST class is significantly more likely to have disorganization of the retinal inner layers inside the central subfield, more paracentral acute middle maculopathy at Month 1, and a history of anti-VEGF treatment prior to trial enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with a thin CST at Month 1 were more likely to be in their Month 1 CST class during Months 2-12 than eyes in the thick or medium Month 1 CST classes. Eyes in the medium CST class had the best VALS, with fewest treatments in the thin class after Month 6. These findings suggest that having a post-treatment thin CST can be as detrimental to visual acuity as having a post-treatment thick CST.

Heterogeneity in disease activity, frequency of treatments, and visual outcomes among patients with retinal vein occlusion: relationship between injection need and vision with as-needed ranibizumab

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We characterised the relationships between monitoring frequency, ranibizumab injection need and vision in patients receiving as-needed (pro re nata; PRN) ranibizumab for macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in this post-hoc analysis of SHORE and HORIZON.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years and older with macular oedema due to BRVO/CRVO were included in this analysis. Injection frequency and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated by PRN injection frequency in the PRN dosing phase (months (M) 7-15) of SHORE and through 12 months of HORIZON. Prespecified PRN re-treatment criteria for each trial were based on protocol-prespecified BCVA and optical coherence tomography outcomes.

RESULTS

After the initial 7 monthly ranibizumab injections, patients in SHORE gained a mean of 18.3 letters from baseline. Patients randomised to PRN, on average, maintained these gains. However, some patients experienced additional mean gains, whereas others suffered losses (range 4.0 (95% CI 0.7 to 7.3) to -4.6 (95% CI -11.8 to 2.6) letters in patients who received 0 and 6-7 PRN injections, respectively). In BRAVO and CRUISE (lead-in trials), patients experienced mean gains from baseline to M6 (monthly dosing) of 19.3 and 15.0 letters, respectively, with gains maintained with PRN from M6 to M12. However, mean BCVA changes from baseline to M12 varied in HORIZON (range -0.4 (95% CI -2.5 to 1.6) to -3.6 (95% CI -6.2 to -1.0) letters in patients who received zero and six injections, respectively, during the preceding PRN phase of BRAVO and CRUISE).

CONCLUSION

The BRVO/CRVO population is heterogenous with a varied response to ranibizumab treatment.

Long-term outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment with 5+PRN regimen for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion

AIM

To assess the long-term outcomes of treating macular edema (ME) associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with a regimen of "5+pro re nata (PRN)".

METHODS

This retrospective study included 27 eyes of 27 patients with ME associated with non-ischemic CRVO (non-iCRVO group, n=15) and ischemic CRVO (iCRVO group, n=12). The eyes were treated with five consecutive intravitreal injections of conbercept or ranibizumab, followed by reinjections as needed or PRN. Retinal laser photocoagulation or intravitreal dexamethasone implants (DEX) were implemented in both groups when necessary. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were recorded at baseline, at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 12mo, and at the final visit. The efficacy rates of BCVA and CRT before and after treatment were calculated. The number of injections at each visit and the incidence of adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

The patients, aged 59.4±15.1y, were followed up for 24.7±8.8mo (range: 15-42mo). After treatment, BCVA improved significantly from 1.04±0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.59±0.36 logMAR (P=0.038) at the final visit in all patients. Both the non-iCRVO and the iCRVO groups achieved improved BCVA compared to the baseline at all visit points, but there was no statistical significance (P=0.197 and 0.33, respectively). The mean CRT was statistically reduced compared to baseline at all visit points in all the eyes and in both groups (all P<0.001). The apparent effective rate was 22.22% for BCVA and 37.04% for CRT after the first injection, 48.15% for BCVA and 62.96% for CRT after 5 consecutive injections, and 74.08% for BCVA and 100% for CRT at the end of follow up. The average number of injections in all patients was 9.0±2.4 at 12mo and 14.9±8.1 finally with no statistical significance between both groups (P>0.05). Laser treatment was applied to all eyes in the iCRVO group, while only 5 patients in the non-iCRVO group. Six patients in the non-iCRVO group and 3 patients in the iCRVO group had a drug switch. DEX was applied to 4 eyes in the non-iCRVO group and 5 eyes in the iCRVO group.

CONCLUSION

The 5+PRN anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regimen is found to be safe and effective for both iCRVO and non-iCRVO, especially in the iCRVO group. The best regimen for such patients needs to be further investigated. Adjuvant laser therapy and DEX are necessary in some cases.

SCORE2 Report 24: Nonlinear Relationship of Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Retinal and Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a nonlinear association between central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral-domain OCT and concurrent visual acuity letter score (VALS) exists in eyes treated initially with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2).

DESIGN

Long-term follow-up after a randomized clinical trial from 64 centers in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were followed up to 60 months and treated at investigator discretion after completing the 12-month treatment protocol.

METHODS

Two-segment linear regression models were compared with simple linear regression models of VALS on CST. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess strength of CST and VALS associations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Central subfield thickness was measured by OCT and VALS by the electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study methodology.

RESULTS

Estimated inflection points, reflecting turning points at which the CST and VALS association changes from positive to negative, calculated at 7 postbaseline visits, range from 217 to 256 μm. A strongly positive correlation exists to the left of each estimated inflection point, ranging from 0.29 (P < 0.01 at month 60) to 0.50 (P < 0.01 at month 12), and a strongly negative correlation exists to the right of each estimated inflection point, ranging from -0.43 (P < 0.01 at month 1) to -0.74 (P < 0.01 at month 24). Randomization statistical tests showed that 2-segment models are favored over 1-segment models for all postbaseline months (P < 0.001 for all tests performed).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between CST and VALS in eyes with CRVO or HRVO after treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is not simply linear. The usually modest correlations between OCT-measured CST and visual acuity belie strong left and right correlations present in 2-segment models. Post-treatment CST close to the estimated inflection points showed the best expected VALS. The SCORE2 participants with a post-treatment CST after treatment close to the estimated inflection points of 217 to 256 μm showed the best VALS. In patients treated with anti-VEGF for macular edema associated with CRVO or HRVO, a thinner retina is not always associated with better VALS.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Treatment discontinuation patterns of anti VEGF in retinal vein occlusion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research is to report on real-world anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment patterns in retinal vein occlusions (RVO).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Treatment-naive RVO patients initiating anti-VEGF injections between 2015 and 2021.

METHODS

Medical records available until June 2022 were reviewed. Demographics, diagnosis, number of injections, treatment length, reason for discontinuation, and baseline and final data (e.g., date, age, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], and central subfield thickness) were recorded. Statistical analyses performed with STATA 17.0 assessed differences between baseline and final values, branch (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and treatment-discontinuation subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 219 treatment-naive eyes were included (70.3 ± 13.2 years of age, 52.5% female), with 99 BRVOs and 120 CRVOs (2482 injections). The discontinuation rate was 76.7% (168 of 219), with 72.7% of patients (77 of 99) with BRVOs and 75.8% of patients (91 of 120) with CRVOs discontinuing injections. Reasons for discontinuation included stable off active therapy (98 eyes), severe comorbidity or death (17 eyes), switched to intraocular steroid (implant or injection) (12 eyes), lack of visual benefit (10 eyes), ocular comorbidity (5 eyes), patient decision (5 eyes), and patient transfer (5 eyes). Among the remaining 67 eyes, 16 (24%) were lost to follow-up. Reasons for discontinuation differed between BRVO and CRVO patients (p = 0.002). Eyes with CRVO presented with worse BCVA (p < 0.0001) and achieved worse final BCVA (p < 0.0001), but both groups experienced improvements (p < 0.0001). Younger age, better baseline BCVA, and a diagnosis of BRVO were independent predictors of better final visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

Over 7.5 years, treatment was discontinued for three-quarters of RVOs. Stable disease was the most common reason for discontinuation, with nearly half (45%) of all RVOs in the cohort stable off active therapy. Better visual outcomes were achieved in BRVO than in CRVO, although both groups benefited from treatment.

SCORE2 Report 20: Relationship of Treatment Discontinuation With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Outcomes

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment discontinuation with baseline factors and outcomes in eyes treated initially with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema from central or hemiretinal vein occlusion.

DESIGN

Long-term follow-up after a randomized clinical trial from 64 US centers.

METHODS

Analysis included 150 SCORE2 Month 60 completers classified into 3 groups: discontinued treatment early, treated intermittently, and treated continuously. Outcomes included visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST).

RESULTS

Patients who discontinued treatment early were younger (60.9 years, vs 66.7 and 70.5 for the treated intermittently and treated continuously groups; P = .001), and 17.4% were Black, compared to 19.5% and 4.7% for the treated intermittently and treated continuously groups (P = .006). At Month 60, the discontinued treatment early group had a higher proportion with complete resolution of macular edema (69.6%) than those treated intermittently (15.0%) and treated continuously (15.7%) (P < .001). Least-squares means analyses over follow-up demonstrated that the discontinued treatment early group had a lower mean CST (257 µm) than the treated intermittently (CST = 303 µm, P = .02) and treated continuously (CST = 300 µm, P = .01) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to those treated continuously, those who discontinued treatment early were younger and more likely Black. The discontinued treatment early group had a higher proportion with complete resolution of macular edema at Month 60, and a lower mean CST over follow-up, but not better VA, than the treated continuously and treated intermittently groups. Results support the need for continued monitoring and individualized treatment for patients treated with anti-VEGF for macular edema from central or hemiretinal vein occlusion.

Predictors of As-Needed Ranibizumab Injection Frequency in Patients With Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biomarkers associated with ranibizumab injection frequency after 7 monthly doses in the prospective, multicenter SHORE study for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

DESIGN

Prospective phase IV clinical trial data.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of 95 patients who received 7 monthly doses of ranibizumab followed by either pro re nata (PRN) or nonrandomized monthly injections from months 7-15 in eyes with macular edema secondary to RVO. Baseline SD-OCT biomarkers assessed include central subfield thickness (CST), epiretinal membrane presence, intraretinal and subretinal fluid, hyperreflective foci, disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), and disruption of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone, or interdigitation zone. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses evaluated the association between SD-OCT biomarkers and ranibizumab injection frequency.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 65.3 (SD, 12.7) years. Overall, 57.9% had BRVO/HRVO and 42.1% of eyes had CRVO. Mean BCVA improved (+17.5 [SD, 1.2] Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) during the 7-month fixed dosing period, remaining stable from baseline (+20.1 [SD, 1.5] ETDRS letters) during the PRN phase from months 7-15. The mean number of PRN injections was 4.32 (SD, 2.35). On multivariate regression, greater baseline DRIL (β = 0.021, P = .0275) and higher CST at month 3 (β = 0.01, P < .001) were associated with a higher total number of PRN injections.

CONCLUSION

Greater baseline DRIL and higher CST at 3 months after starting ranibizumab treatment are associated with more frequent ranibizumab injections in PRN-treated patients with macular edema due to RVO.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Retinal Vein Occlusion in Routine Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To characterize treatment patterns for retinal vein occlusion (RVO)-related macular edema (ME) in routine clinical practice and its impact on long-term best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 365 eyes with branch RVO (BRVO) or central/hemi-RVO (CRVO/HRVO)-related ME between 2003 and 2020. Regression analysis identified factors associated with maintenance injection interval (MII). Subgroup analysis compared outcomes between different MIIs.

RESULTS

51.3% of BRVO patients received injections ≤q8 weeks, 26.4% received injections q8-12 weeks, and 22.3% received injections >q12 weeks. 45.2% of CRVO/HRVO patients received injections ≤q8 weeks, 32.1% received injections q8-12 weeks, and 22.6% received injections >q12 weeks. Age, diabetes, and baseline CST were found to predict MII. There was no significant difference in BCVA and CST at baseline, 12, or 24 months in all MII groups in BRVO and CRVO/HRVO.

CONCLUSION

There exists a significant heterogeneity in anti-VEGF treatment frequency for RVO-associated ME in routine clinical practice. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53:626-633.].

Central retinal vein occlusion 36-month outcomes with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry

PURPOSE

To analyze the 3-year outcomes in a broad population of patients starting VEGF inhibitors for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN

Observational database study.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 527 treatment-naïve CRVO eyes that commenced VEGF inhibitors between December 1, 2010 and 2018 were tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry.

METHODS

Longitudinal models were used to plot changes in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change in VA from baseline to 36 months, injections, visits, completion, switching, and suspensions of therapy > 180 days at the final review.

RESULTS

Overall (527 eyes) mean VA change (95% confidence interval [CI]) was + 10 (7, 12) letters, 37% had final VA ≥ 70 and 30% ≤ 35 letters, mean CST changed -306 μm. Completers (257/527, 49%) had mean 36-month changes in VA and CST of + 12 letters and -324 μm with a median of 18 injections at 26 visits. The adjusted mean VA change was similar to each VEGF inhibitor (mean, + 11.4 letters) despite a greater reduction in CST with aflibercept (-310 μm) versus ranibizumab (-258 μm) versus bevacizumab (-216 μm; P < 0.001). Eyes with baseline VA that was trial-eligible (19-73 letters; 356/527, 68%) gained 7 letters, very poor (< 19 letters; 129/527, 24%) gained 22 letters, or very good (> 73 letters; 42/527, 8%) lost 7 letters. Switching (160/527, 30%) was most often to aflibercept (79 eyes). By using suspensions and discontinuation reasons, we identified similar proportions had ceased therapy (154/527, 29%) and were still receiving it at 36 months (165/527, 31%). Only 62/527 eyes (12%) had resolution of macular edema without treatment for > 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CRVO that commenced VEGF inhibitors in routine care for whom follow-up was available had VA improvements of around 12 letters at 3 years, but with > 50% lost to follow-up, the VA outcome for the entire group was likely worse. The choice of VEGF inhibitor influenced CST but not VA outcomes. We estimated that around half of the eyes were still receiving injections after 36 months.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Month 60 Outcomes After Treatment Initiation With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate 5-year outcomes in eyes initially treated with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema due to central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Long-term follow-up (LTF) after a randomized clinical trial from 64 centers in the United States. Participants were followed up to 60 months and treated at investigator discretion after completing the 12-month treatment protocol. Main outcomes were visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent (248/330) of eligible participants completed at least 1 visit between months 24 and 60, and 45% completed the month 60 visit. Among participants completing month 60, overall mean VALS improvement over baseline was 13.5 (95% CI: 9.6, 17.5), less than the mean improvement of 20.6 (95% CI: 18.7, 22.4) observed at month 12, with no significant differences between originally assigned study groups. Further, 66% (99/150) had at least 1 treatment between months 48 and 60 with a mean (SD) of 3.41 (3.69) treatments over this period. Mean CST was 671 μm at baseline and 261 μm (95% CI: 241.2, 280.9) at month 60.

CONCLUSIONS

Although VALS improved substantially when patients were treated per protocol through month 12, improvement lessened when treatment was at investigator discretion and fewer treatments were received although VALS remained markedly improved over baseline through year 5. Most patients continued to receive treatment in year 5. This suggests that continued monitoring and, if warranted, treatment with anti-VEGF therapy benefits patients with macular edema associated with central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion. Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

SCORE2 Report 17: Macular thickness fluctuations in anti-VEGF-treated patients with central or hemiretinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate macular thickness fluctuations and their association with visual acuity outcome in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to central (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) treated initially with intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of 362 patients with ME secondary to CRVO or HRVO initially randomized to six monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept or bevacizumab. Three spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) central subfield thickness (CST) fluctuation measures were investigated over Months 1-12: standard deviation (SD), number of turning points (T) for each participant, and a measure denoted as Zigzag reflecting the magnitude of alternating ups and downs in a participant's CST. Main outcome measure is Month 12 visual acuity letter score (VALS).

RESULTS

More fluctuations occurred in eyes randomized to bevacizumab than aflibercept: SD (59.98 vs 32.12; p < 0.0001), T (4.03 vs 3.53; p = 0.02) and Zigzag (24.91 vs 11.60; p = 0.0003). Month 12 VALS is significantly lower for the 4th (highest) quartile of the CST fluctuation measure than for the 1st (lowest) quartile for both SD (mean difference in VALS of 7.87; 95% confidence interval: 3.03, 12.70) and Zigzag (mean difference in VALS of 5.11; 95% confidence interval: 0.29, 9.93). SD and Zigzag quartiles were no longer significantly different after Month 1 VALS was added to the regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater CST fluctuation as assessed by SD and Zigzag was negatively associated with Month 12 VALS. However, early post-treatment VALS is a stronger predictor of VALS outcomes than the CST fluctuation measures.

Association between early and late response in eyes with central or hemiretinal vein occlusion treated with anti-VEGF agents : SCORE2 report 12: secondary analysis of the SCORE2 clinical trial

PURPOSE

To assess whether early visual acuity letter score change from baseline (ΔVALS) and early spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) measures of center point thickness (CPT) are associated with later ΔVALS in eyes with macular edema due to central or hemiretinal vein occlusion treated with intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 362 participants.

RESULTS

Considered separately at month 3, CPT (categorized as ≤ 300 μm, > 300 μm) and ΔVALS (categorized as < 5, 5-9, ≥ 10) are predictive of ΔVALS at month 6 (aflibercept: P = 0.02 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.007 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS) and, except for CPT in the bevacizumab arm, also predictive of ΔVALS at month 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.03 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.18 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS). Month 3 predictors are also associated with average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (CPT P = 0.01 in the aflibercept arm, P = 0.02 in the bevacizumab arm; ΔVALS > 10 versus < 5; P < 0.001 for both aflibercept and bevacizumab). When month 3 measures are considered jointly, ΔVALS effect remains significant for average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.002; bevacizumab: P < 0.0001) but not CPT (aflibercept: P = 0.18; bevacizumab: P = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

While both month 3 ΔVALS and CPT are predictive of ΔVALS after month 3 through month 12, early ΔVALS has a stronger relationship than CPT with later ΔVALS. SCORE2 registration number is NCT01969708.

Cost-Utility of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-utility of treatment for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) using intravitreal injections of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept.

DESIGN

Decision analysis model of cost-utility.

PARTICIPANTS

Data from study participants in the Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in Vein Occlusion (LEAVO) study.

METHODS

A decision analysis of a disease simulation model was used to calculate comparative cost-utility of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR), and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) for the treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO based on data from the LEAVO study. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were used to calculate associated modeled costs in a hospital- or facility-based and nonfacility setting from a third-party payer perspective, and societal costs also were calculated. Cost utility was calculated based on the preserved visual utility during the 2 years of the study and also by estimating utility for the expected lifetime.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost of treatment, cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

From the third-party payer perspective, the estimated lifetime costs per QALY in the facility and nonfacility settings were $39 325 and $17 944, respectively, for IVB; $114 095 and $92 653, respectively, for IVR; and $78 935 and $63 270, respectively, for IVA. From the societal perspective, the estimated lifetime costs per QALY in the facility setting were $52 754 for IVB, $128 242 for IVR, and $86 262 for IVA. The ICER of IVA compared with that of IVB was $153 633/QALY from the third-party facility setting and $152 992/QALY from the societal perspective. The use of IVB compared with IVR and IVA compared with IVR were cost-saving interventions (ICER, <0) regardless of the perspective or setting.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of macular edema in CRVO, IVB yields the best cost utility among the 3 anti-VEGF agents modeled. Intravitreal aflibercept maintains acceptable lifetime cost per QALY while having a favorable cost utility compared with IVR.

Use of Anti-VEGF Drugs in Retinal Vein Occlusions

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is one of the most prevalent causes of visual loss in the Western World. Its pathogenesis is still not completely known. Chronic macular edema and ischemia compromise the functional and anatomical status of the retina. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have demonstrated better results than other previous options, including observation or laser therapy. This narrative review aims to analyze the current aspects related to these drugs.