Preference Phenotypes in Thyroid Nodule Management: A Patient Segmentation Approach

OBJECTIVE

Patient preferences regarding thyroid nodules are poorly understood. Our objective is to (1) employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to explore risk tradeoffs in thyroid nodule management, and (2) segment respondents into preference phenotypes.

STUDY DESIGN

DCE.

SETTING

Thyroid surgery clinic, online survey.

METHODS

A DCE including 5 attributes (cancer risk, voice concerns, incision/scar, medication requirement, follow-up frequency) was refined with qualitative patient and physician input. A final DCE including 8 choice tasks, demographics, history, and risk tolerance was administered to participants with and without thyroid disease. Analysis was performed with multinomial logit modeling and latent class analysis (LCA) for preference phenotyping.

RESULTS

A total of 1026 respondents were included; 480 had thyroid disease. Risk aversion was associated with increasing age (P < .001), female gender (P < .001), and limited education (P = .038), but not previous thyroid disease. Cancer risk most significantly impacted decision-making. Of the total possible utility change from thyroid nodule decision-making, 47.8% was attributable to variations in cancer risk; 20.0% from medication management; 14.9% from voice changes; 12.7% from incision/scar; and 4.6% from follow-up concerns. LCA demonstrated 3 classes with distinct preference phenotypes: the largest group (64.2%) made decisions primarily based on cancer risk; another group (18.2%) chose based on aversion to medication; the smallest group (17.7%) factored in medication and cancer risk evenly.

CONCLUSION

Cancer risk and the need to take medication after thyroid surgery factor into patient decision-making most heavily when treating thyroid nodules. Distinct preference phenotypes were demonstrated, reinforcing the need for individual preference assessment before the treatment of thyroid disorders.

Patient Experiences With Thyroid Nodules: A Qualitative Interview Survey

Objective

To qualitatively explore the broad set of preferences and attitudes patients have about thyroid nodules, which influence the decision-making process.

Study Design

A descriptive survey design was administered as interviews.

Setting

Outpatient thyroid surgery clinic.

Methods

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 patients presenting for initial evaluation of thyroid nodules at a surgeon's office. Probative, open-ended questions were posed regarding diagnosis, treatment, risk attitudes, and the decision-making process. Thematic analysis was used to develop code-transcribed interviews, and an iterative refinement resulted in underlying themes.

Results

During the diagnostic process, patients integrated emotional responses (fear, anxiety, and shock) with rationale concerns (likelihood of cancer, risk assessment), and ultimately relied heavily on expert opinion and recommendation. Contextualization with other personal or familial health problems served as helpful touchstones for decision-making. Overtreatment and overdiagnosis were not commonly discussed. When thinking about potential therapies, there was a strong bias to action rather than surveillance among patients. Surgical risk and the possibility of lifelong medication, however, were strong motivators for a subset of patients to seek nonsurgical alternatives.

Conclusion

Patients describe a decision-making process that incorporates emotional response and rational consideration of risks, contextualized within the personal experience and physician expertise. The bias for action and intervention is strong, and most patients strongly weighted physicians' recommendations. Themes from this qualitative analysis may serve as the backbone for future stated preference research pertaining to thyroid disease.

Construct Validity of the EuroQoL-5 Dimension and the Health Utilities Index in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the construct validity of 2 health utility instruments-the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and the Health Utilities Index-Mark 3 (HUI-3)-and to compare them with disease-specific measures in patients with head and neck cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre.

METHODS

Patients were administered the EQ-5D, HUI-3, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its head and neck cancer module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UWQoL). Several a priori expected relations were examined. The correlative and discriminative properties of the various instruments were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients completed the 4 questionnaires. A significant ceiling effect was observed among EQ-5D responses (23% reported a maximum score of 1). The EQ-5D (rho = 0.79) and HUI-3 (rho = 0.60) had a strong correlation with the social-emotional domain of the UWQoL. The EQ-5D had a moderate correlation with the physical domain of the UWQoL (rho = 0.42), whereas the HUI-3 had a weak correlation (rho = 0.29). The EQ-5D and HUI-3 were able to distinguish among levels of health severity measured on the EORTC QLQ-C30 though not the QLQ-H&N35. Comparatively, the UWQoL was able to distinguish levels of disease severity on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that disease-specific domains from head and neck quality-of-life instruments are not strongly correlated with the EQ-5D and HUI-3. Consideration should be put toward development of a disease-specific preference-based measure for health economic evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Neurotization Preferences in Smile Reanimation: A Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND

Common donor nerve options in smile reanimation include ipsilateral trigeminal motor or contralateral facial nerve branches. Neurotization preference may be influenced by multiple factors, whose relative importance remains poorly understood. In this article, decision-making in smile reanimation is assessed using a stated preference model.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews with facial palsy patients identified five relevant attributes for study: smile type ("smile when biting" versus "smile spontaneously" as proxies for trigeminal versus cross-facial neurotization), number of operations, success rates, complication rates, and side effects. Community volunteers (n = 250) completed a discrete-choice experiment relevant to free muscle transfer for smile reanimation. Preoperative and postoperative states were demonstrated through video vignettes, together with explanation of surgical risks, consequences, and benefits. Attribute importance was modeled using hierarchical Bayes estimation.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-one responses met quality controls. Attribute importance ranked as follows: chance of success, 37.3 percent; smile type, 21.4 percent; side effects, 13.9 percent; complication rates, 13.8; and number of operations, 13.6 percent. All attributes significantly correlated with decision making (p < 0.0001). An aggregate response model revealed most participants (67.6 percent; standard error, 3.0 percent) preferred smile reanimation by cross-facial (assuming a success rate of 80 percent) as opposed to ipsilateral trigeminal motor branch neurotization. When the success rate for cross-facial neurotization was reduced below 67 percent, trigeminal neurotization was preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher risk of failure, most respondents preferred a cross-facial as opposed to trigeminal neurotization strategy for smile reanimation. These findings highlight the complexity of decision-making and need for individualized risk tolerance assessment in the field of facial reanimation.

Decision aid and preference assessment of topical anesthesia for otolaryngology procedures

OBJECTIVES

To determine preference patterns for topical anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy pre-coronavirus (2019 coronavirus disease [COVID-19]) pandemic and analyze outcomes based on preference, using a decision aid format.

METHODS

A decision aid was developed with expert and patient input. New patients presenting to subspecialty clinics over a 2-month pre-COVID-19 period completed a pre-procedure survey about their priorities, then were asked to choose between topical oxymetazoline/lidocaine spray or none. A post-procedure outcome survey followed.

RESULTS

Of 151 patients, 90.1% patients elected to have topical anesthesia. Top patient priorities were "I want the scope to be easy for the doctor" and "I want to be as comfortable as possible." Patients who strongly wanted to avoid medication (P = .002) and bad taste (P = .003) were more likely to select no spray, whereas those who wanted to avoid pain received anesthetic (P = .011). According to the post-procedure assessment, 95.4% of patients were satisfied or strongly satisfied their choice, and this did not correlate with anesthetic vs none.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient preferences are easily elicited and correlate with treatment choices. Most patients chose to have topical anesthetic and were willing to tolerate side effects; however, both patients with and without topical anesthetic were satisfied with their choices. This decision aid can be used to optimize shared decision making in the otolaryngology clinic. Given the aerosolizing potential of both spray and no spray conditions, this insight may be consequential when devising office protocols for post-COVID-19 practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

How Patients Choose a Laryngologist: A Pilot Stated Preference Study

Objective

Patients consider many factors when deciding how to receive medical care. This study used best-worst scaling (BWS), a technique novel to otolaryngology, to quantitatively examine preferences among patients choosing a laryngologist. Our objective was to quantify in a pilot cohort the relative importance patients place on a variety of attributes when seeking a laryngologist.

Study Design

BWS survey.

Setting

Academic voice clinic.

Methods

New patients were recruited to take a computerized BWS survey developed using attributes derived from patient input, expert opinion, and literature review. Attributes were grouped into 4 categories: physician reputation, physician qualifications, hospital-related factors, and other nonclinical factors. Responses were analyzed using multinomial logit regression to determine importance scores and associations with other variables.

Results

Eighty-seven of 93 patients recruited participated (93.5% response rate). Physician qualifications were the most important attributes to patients, with specialty laryngology training receiving the highest importance score (20.8; 95% CI, 20.2 to 21.5; P < .0001). Recommendations from referring physicians (15.6; 95% CI, 14.3 to 16.9) and use of cutting-edge technology (11.9; 95% CI, 10.7 to 13.1) were the second and third most important, respectively. Least important were nonclinical factors, including wait time to get an appointment (4.3; 95% CI, 2.8 to 5.8) and convenience of office location (1.5; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1). Just over half of patients (51.2%) reported willingness to wait 4 weeks for an appointment with a laryngologist. Older patients were less concerned with convenience-related factors.

Conclusion

Nonclinical factors were less important to patients than clinical factors, and laryngology-specific training was paramount. Stated preference methodologies can elucidate underlying preferences and help providers make care more patient centered.

[Oncology Services for Patients with Head Neck Cancer during Corona-Times - Patients' Perspective]

OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 pandemic has impact on the oncology service system for tumor patients. What is the view of head and neck cancer patients (HNC) on this situation and which coping strategies were developed?

MATERIAL & METHODS

In study 1 PRIO asked 433 tumor patients regarding their impressions/fears during the lockdown between April 15 and May 15, 2020 (online, standardized questionnaire). In 2^nd study 292 tumor patients reported their pandemic-induced perceived changes and coping strategies by established questionnaires (WHO-5, MLQ, GrAw-7). An analysis of the HNC-data obtained by standardized questionnaires was performed.

RESULTS

Study 1 had 91 HNC, study 2-84 HNC. Study 1 shows high stress levels for the majority of HNC (53,8 %). Personal fears regarding the own disease and therapies (39.6 %) are a central problem. The participants await physical (24.7 %) as well as psychological (21.3 %) consequences due to the pandemic and its current management. During the lockdown the isolation (banned visitors at any hospital) was discussed as critical main point by 58.5 % of HNC patients. Study 2 (after lockdown) underlined the mental stress caused by pandemic. Intensified relations within the families (58/100 points) as well as more intensive experience of nature and silence (58/60 points) are the most perceived changes in corona-times. HNC showed increased own inactivity (MLQ) and depressed well-being (WHO-5) and attention to the moment (GrAw-7).

CONCLUSIONS

HNC patients have had high burden and fears due to the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020. Their views are important for further strategies to organize and stabilize the oncology service system during further pandemic periods.

Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part XII: Assessing Patient Preferences

OBJECTIVE

To provide a contemporary resource to update clinicians and researchers on the current state of assessment of patient preferences.

DATA SOURCES

Published studies and literature regarding patient preferences, evidence-based practice, and patient-centered management in otolaryngology.

REVIEW METHODS

Patients make choices based on both physician input and their own preferences. These preferences are informed by personal values and attitudes, and they ideally result from a deliberative evaluation of the risks, benefits, and other outcomes pertaining to medical care. To date, rigorous evaluation of patient preferences for otolaryngologic conditions has not been integrated into clinical practice or research. This installment of the "Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology" series focuses on formal assessment of patient preferences and the optimal methods to determine them.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods have been developed to optimize our understanding of patient preferences.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Understanding these patient preferences may help promote an evidence-based approach to the care of individual patients.

Topical anesthetic techniques in office-based laryngeal surgery: A comparison of patient preferences

OBJECTIVES

Multiple topical anesthesia techniques exist for office-based laryngeal surgery. Our objective was to assess patient and surgeon satisfaction for three different techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

METHODS

All consecutive patients presenting to an outpatient laryngology office for awake surgical procedures were enrolled. Patients were anesthetized with local anesthesia (2 cubic centimeters of 4% lidocaine) in one of three ways: 1) nebulizer, 2) flexible cannula through a channeled laryngoscope, or 3) transtracheal instillation. Demographics, procedure times, and surgeon satisfaction were recorded. A validated 11-item patient satisfaction questionnaire (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Survey) was administered after the procedure to calculate an overall satisfaction score (-3[worst] to 3[best]). Descriptive and correlative statistics were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred consecutive patients were included (37 females, 73 males), with relatively equal numbers between groups (32 nebulizer, 35 cannula, 33 transtracheal). Seven procedures were aborted (4 nebulizer, 2 cannula, 1 transtracheal) due to movement, anxiety, or technical issues. Three patients did not adequately complete the survey. Of the 90 remaining patients, patient satisfaction was highest with the transtracheal technique (2.04) versus cannula (1.46) or nebulizer (1.45), and this was statistically significant (P = 0.0167). This difference was driven by decreased pain and nausea scores in the transtracheal group. Surgeon satisfaction was lower with nebulizer and higher with transtracheal injection (P = 0.0081). There was a correlation between surgeon satisfaction and patient satisfaction (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Transtracheal instillation was favored by both patients and the surgeon. Choice of local anesthetic techniques may impact patient preferences and surgical success. This may serve as a basis for optimizing anesthetic care in office-based laryngeal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:166-170, 2020.

Enhancing dysphonia clinic consultations through a focus on patients' expectations: streamlining and validation of a new tool ('ACaPELa-R' questionnaire)

OBJECTIVE

The Assessing and Caring for Patients' Expectations in Laryngology ('ACaPELa') questionnaire was developed to guide laryngology clinic consultations. This study aimed to audit its use, revise it depending on outcomes and validate it.

METHODS

The questionnaire was completed by all new patients attending a laryngology clinic over one year. The questionnaire was refined and validated in a new cohort of patients over a six-month period.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 242 patients (15.3 per cent) incorrectly gave the same ranking to more than one question. Questions with similar content were collapsed to cover broader themes, and an outcome question was added, resulting in the five-item Assessing and Caring for Patients' Expectations in Laryngology - Revised ('ACaPELa-R') questionnaire. Using this revised questionnaire, there was a significant reduction in the number of same-ranked questions (4.4 vs 15.3 per cent; p = 0.003) and high patient satisfaction post-consultation (95.7 per cent).

CONCLUSION

The Assessing and Caring for Patients' Expectations in Laryngology - Revised questionnaire makes patients' rank ordering of questions easier. It can be used to inform how different topics should be approached during the consultation and utilised for clinician self-audit.

Voice Outcomes After Radiation for Early-Stage Laryngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Radiation treatment for laryngeal cancer has been shown to cause tissue changes to the vocal folds, which can result in degradation of voice. Our objective in this study was to investigate changes in perceptual, acoustic, and patient-reported outcomes over an extended period of follow-up after radiation.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

All patients treated with radiation for early-stage laryngeal carcinoma (in situ, T1, or T2) by a single surgeon from 2011-2018 were reviewed. Demographics and treatment information were recorded. Only patients with at least two dates of follow-up with acoustic data (cepstral spectral index of dysphonia [CSID]) and patient-reported surveys (voice handicap index-10 [VHI-10]) were included. Voice samples were rated by two senior speech-language pathologists on the grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain scale.

RESULTS

Of 115 patients with early-stage laryngeal cancer, 31 patients met inclusion criteria. The average follow-up from time of treatment was 9.6 years (range 3.0-20.3 years), and the average time in between the first and last voice recordings was 2.6 years (range 0.3-5.5 years). The lesions represented were carcinoma in situ (n = 4), T1 (n = 22), and T2 (n = 5). The VHI-10 scores worsened slightly (mean increase +0.27, median +1) from first to last measurements as did the CSID score (median increase +7.0, median +7.4), though neither reached statistical significance when correlated with time since radiation (P = 0.269 and P = 0.0850). Perceptual analysis as rated by two speech-language pathologists raters showed excellent inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84), with no significant change over time (mean +0.39, median, with P = 0.347). Grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain, VHI-10, and CSID were all correlated (all pairwise comparisons P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Perceptual, acoustic, and patient-reported outcomes years after radiation for early-stage laryngeal cancer do not show voice degradation over time in this preliminary analysis. Further research with a larger cohort may elucidate voice changes in this population.