Comparison of Autologous vs Homologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Interpositional arthroplasty using cartilage allografts for treating temporomandibular joint arthrosis: a 3- and 5-year retrospective clinical follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of arthroplasty using interpositional cartilage allografts in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study included patients treated consecutively between 2007 and 2013 using discectomy and interpositional grafting with lyophilized costal cartilage allograft (Tutoplast) sheets. TMJ pain based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), maximal interincisal opening (MIO), joint tenderness to palpation, crepitus from the affected joint, and postoperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Arthroplasty was performed on 37 joints among 34 patients (28 women; mean age: 54 years); 24 joints underwent simultaneous condyle shaving. At final follow-up (3 [n = 37] or 5 [n = 21] years), we observed reduced mean VAS (from 7.6 to 0.9; P < .001) increased mean MIO (from 32.5 to 41.1 mm; P < .001), number of joints with capsule tenderness (from 30 to 3; P < .001), and percentage of joints with crepitus (from 97% to 75%; P = .008). One joint required reoperation because of interposed cartilage fragmentation. No permanent facial nerve injury or malocclusion occurred after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Interpositional arthroplasty is a relatively simple, moderately invasive, and effective surgical treatment for TMJ arthrosis with few complications. However, long-term outcomes of this treatment, specifically beyond 3-5 years postoperatively, remain unknown.

Structural Support for Large to Total Nasal Reconstruction

When large defects of the nose are present, it is imperative to address all 3 layers: the external skin envelope, the osteocartilaginous support, and the inner mucosal lining. The middle structural framework is the primary factor in determining the overall shape of the nose, in addition to facilitating a functional and patent airway. As such, its reconstruction must be robust enough to provide lasting osteocartilaginous support while minimizing disfiguring bulk. The goal is replacement of missing tissue with grafts of similar strength, size, and shape. This article will review approaches to the reconstruction of structural support in large nasal defects.

The current techniques in dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

An essential aspect of rhinoplasty is the enhancement of the nasal dorsal contour by performing dorsal augmentation (DA) rhinoplasty. A wide range of techniques are available for DA as the demand for aesthetic nasal refinement grows. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current techniques used in DA rhinoplasty.

MAIN BODY

Research articles on DA rhinoplasty techniques were identified through a comprehensive literature search. Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science were used as electronic databases. Each database was searched for articles published since its inception. DA rhinoplasty techniques were examined in this literature review. Methodological quality was assessed for the selected studies, and data was extracted to examine materials used, surgical approaches, and reported outcomes for each technique. Various DA methods, including autologous grafts and synthetic implants, are examined in-depth in this review. Comparing approaches can help better understand their respective advantages and limitations.

CONCLUSION

A wealth of techniques is available for DA rhinoplasty, each with advantages. Patients' nasal anatomy, desired outcomes, and potential risks must be considered by surgeons when determining their surgical approach. DA methods continue to evolve rapidly, creating a need for a thorough understanding of the current landscape to make informed decisions.

Complications of Nasal Tip Stabilizing Grafts with Autologous Versus Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage in Septorhinoplasty: A Systematic Review

Background: Complications associated with the use of autologous and homologous costal cartilage for nasal tip stabilizing grafts in septorhinoplasty are not well understood. Objective: The authors review current literature to evaluate complications associated with autologous and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) used for septal extension and columellar strut grafts in rhinoplasty. Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles that used autologous or IHCC for either septal extension or columellar strut grafts in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty were included. The primary outcomes analyzed were postoperative complications. Results: A total of 14 studies representing 1358 patients were included. The pooled complication rate was 4.7%. IHCC grafts were associated with a higher incidence of complications (n = 21, 5.0% vs. n = 44, 4.6%, p = 0.01). Resorption was the most common complication in the IHCC group and occurred significantly more frequently than in the autologous costal cartilage (ACC) group (n = 10, 2.4% vs. n = 5, 0.49%, p = 0.002). Deviation/warping was the most common complication in the ACC group (n = 16, 1.7%). Conclusion: Autologous and irradiated homologous costal rhinoplasties remain safe procedures. The increased incidence of resorption associated with IHCC grafts should be considered during preoperative planning.

Investigation of Two New Grafting Techniques for Dorsal Augmentation Rhinoplasty: An Experimental Study with New Zealand White Rabbits

INTRODUCTION

Cartilage is an important source in supporting the structure of the nose for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. However, it is known that its viability is not always on the ideal level. Various wrapping materials are used to increase the strength of cartilage. Donor site morbidity, which develops following the harvesting of both cartilage and fascia as one such cover material, has attracted interest in recent years.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of dermis and tendon autografts as alternatives to fascia and cartilage.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The sample of the study included 16 New Zealand white rabbits. The right auricular cartilage of all rabbits was amputated, and it was transformed into diced cartilage autografts. The dermis autografts from the right gluteal areas of the rabbits were deepithelialized, and lumbosacral fascia autografts were harvested from the same incision. Additionally, the Achilles tendon of each rabbit was harvested and transformed into diced tendon autografts. Four different autografts were embedded under the skin of each rabbit from 4 different pouches opened in the back of the rabbit. These autografts included diced cartilage alone (Intervention 1), fascia-wrapped cartilage (Intervention 2), dermis-wrapped cartilage (Intervention 3) and fascia-wrapped tendon (Intervention 4) autografts.

RESULTS

Intervention 1 had the most irregular appearance, the outcomes in Intervention 4 were volumetrically smaller and softer. Connective tissue formed between the diced pieces in all interventions, and it was observed that the dermis and fascia had a capsule-like appearance, and their viability was preserved. The differences between the initial and final measurements of the volumes of interventions 1, 2 and 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the initial and final volumetric measurements of intervention 4 (p > 0.05). More peripheral proliferation was observed in the interventions of fascia-wrapped and dermis-wrapped diced cartilage compared to the other interventions. The intervention including fascia-wrapped diced tendon grafts had displayed more fibrosis, fragmentation and collagen fibers, while it showed a lower amount of elastic fiber. There were no significant differences among the intervention in terms of other histological parameters.

CONCLUSION

Tendon autografts may be a good option for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty as they are easily harvested and have minimal donor site morbidity. Dermis autograft usage is more advantageous than fascia usage in terms of accessibility and convenience.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes.

METHODS

The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review.

RESULTS

Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%).

CONCLUSION

Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Outcomes of Autologous Versus Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Graft in Rhinoplasty

Background: Autologous costal cartilage (ACC) and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are commonly used in septorhinoplasty when there is insufficient septal cartilage for grafting. Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent septorhinoplasty with either ACC or IHCC as measured by rates of infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent rhinoplasty with ACC or IHCC at a single academic institution was performed. Demographic data, surgical details, antibiotic use, and outcomes, including surgical duration, infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate, were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression. Results: One hundred forty-three patients were identified. The median age was 48 years (interquartile range: 35-57.5) and 62.2% (n = 89) were female, 61 patients (42.7%) underwent ACC, and 82 (57.3%) IHCC. Revision rate in both groups was similar (ACC = 14.8%, IHCC = 14.6%; p = 0.98). There was no difference in infection rate (ACC = 4.9%, IHCC = 3.7%; p = 0.71). Postoperative deformity and nasal obstruction were the most common indications for revision surgery. Surgical time was shorter with IHCC (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (±25) for ACC, and 16 months (±12) for IHCC. Conclusions: ACC and IHCC are similar in terms of effectiveness and safety in septorhinoplasty.

Use of human acellular dermal matrix in rhinoplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Alloplastic implants such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM) have been used for various aesthetic and reconstructive purposes since the 1990s. Rhinoplasty addresses both aesthetic and functional nasal impairments, often involving the adoption of grafting materials. Currently, autologous grafts, such as those using septal cartilage, are the gold standard. However, they pose the risk of donor site morbidity, technical challenges, and additional operative time. We review total complications, resorption/re-operation and success rates associated with the use of ADM in rhinoplasty. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Prospero, DynaMed, DARE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases. (Registry: CRD42023428019). A total of 462 patients from 15 studies were included, the mean (range) age was 30 (12-65) years, with a female-to-male ratio of 2:1. The most common indications for ADM were for cosmetic (35%, n = 163) and functional rhinoplasty (5%, n = 24). The most common type of ADM used was Alloderm (46%, n = 211). The most common indication for ADM was dorsal nasal augmentation (68%, n = 314). Eleven patients (2%) required revision surgery. The pooled success of ADM in rhinoplasty was 96% (95% CI 94 to 99, p = 0.93; I2 = 0%). 2% of patients developed postoperative complications and no statistically significant difference was seen in complications or success rates when comparing the different types of ADM. ADM in rhinoplasty was associated with fewer complications and re-operation rates, and similar if not less resorption compared to traditional autografts. Therefore, it can be a viable alternative to current autologous grafts in rhinoplasty surgery.

Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Cartilage Graft in Augmentation Rhinoplasty

Augmentation rhinoplasty or commonly known as "nose jobs" is one of the most common plastic surgical procedures aimed to improve cosmetic appearance. This procedure is considerably safer, less time consuming with faster recovery and immediate cosmetic effect. This procedure needs of highly experienced and well-trained plastic surgeon. According to facial analysis you can select the type of rhinoplasty. Open discussion with the patient to select appropriate surgical technique and its possible risks with your plastic surgeon to ensure the highest level of safety and satisfaction. Autologous grafting materials are safe, efficient and also the first choice for rhinoplasty due to it can survive without a vascular supply, the resorption rate of cartilage is much lower than that of a bone graft. Autologous grafting materials are stable and resistant to infection and extrusion over time so, they are successfully used for dorsal augmentation. To perform successful augmentation rhinoplasty, surgeons should be highly experienced and well-trained and augmentation materials that are currently available and understand their risks, benefits and uses. Autologous cartilage graft regarded as the graft of choice in augmentation rhinoplasty because of their lower rate of infection, rejection, resorption, extrusion, donor site morbidity, easy reshaping.

Considerations for Optimal Grafting in Rhinoplasty

A wide variety of grafting materials and techniques can be used to create functional and aesthetic changes in rhinoplasty. Choosing the optimal grafting approach is critical to achieving an optimal patient outcome. We present a review of autografts, allografts, and alloplasts used in primary and revision rhinoplasty and discuss factors that impact graft choice. Autologous grafts serve as the pillar for grafting material in rhinoplasty given their reliable long-term outcomes, low rates of infection, resorption, and extrusion, and ability to provide structural scaffolding as well as contour. Cadaveric allografts can be utilized as a source of grafting material in certain clinical scenarios including revision rhinoplasty and have been shown to be equally safe and effective as autologous grafts while avoiding donor-site morbidity. Alloplasts can prove useful in rhinoplasty in cases of iatrogenic nasal deformities or revision cases. Careful consideration of clinical scenario, patient factors, and outcome goals is necessary to choose the appropriate grafting approach to address functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Subcutaneously Transplanted Fresh Cartilage in Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Immunocompetent Mouse

Cartilage is considered to be immune privileged in general. Clinically, live cells are removed from subcutaneously transplanted allogeneic cartilage mainly for preservation and for infection control. However, because maintaining cartilage feature requires live chondrocyte, it would be beneficial to subcutaneously transplant cartilage with live chondrocyte even if it was allogeneic. We harvested femoral head from 3-week-old male C57BL/6 mice, subcutaneously transplanted to 6-week-old male mice, BALB/c, BALB/c nu/nu, or C57BL/6-Tg (enhanced green fluorescent protein [EGFP] under the control of the CMV-IE enhancer, chicken beta-actin promoter, rabbit beta-globin genomic DNA [CAG promoter]), as allogeneic, allogeneic immunodeficient control, or syngeneic transplantation. We also transplanted cartilaginous particles from human induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human leukocyte antigen homozygous donor to 6-week-old male mice either BALB/c and BALB/c nu/nu as xenogeneic or xenogeneic immunodeficient control. The transplantation periods were 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. As the result, we did not observe exposure of the transplant or apparent macroscopic inflammatory in all samples. Histological analysis suggested that the femoral head showed focal ossification and thinning in syngeneic transplantation. In allogeneic transplantation, slight invasion of CD3 (+) T cell and the denaturation of the cartilage were observed, suggesting immune reaction against allogeneic cartilage. In xenogeneic transplantation, slight invasion of CD3 (+) cell and CD4 (+) cell and the structure of the perichondrium-like tissue got unclear, suggesting slight immune reaction against xenogeneic cartilage. Our findings suggest that we should carefully investigate for appropriate procedure to control immune reaction against allogeneic cartilage with live chondrocyte and to maintain its cartilage feature for long time.

UCHL1 alleviates apoptosis in chondrocytes via upregulation of HIF‑1α‑mediated mitophagy

Stem cell‑based tissue engineering has shown significant potential for rapid restoration of injured cartilage tissues. Stem cells frequently undergo apoptosis because of the prevalence of oxidative stress and inflammation in the microenvironment at the sites of injury. Our previous study demonstrated that stabilization of hypoxia‑inducible factor 1α (HIF‑1α) is key to resisting apoptosis in chondrocytes. Recently, it was reported that Ubiquitin C‑terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1) can stabilize HIF‑1α by abrogating the ubiquitination process. However, the effect of UCHL1 on apoptosis in chondrocytes remains unclear. Herein, adipose‑derived stem cells were differentiated into chondrocytes. Next, the CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) system, LDN‑57444 (LDM; a specific inhibitor for UCHL1), KC7F2 (a specific inhibitor for HIF‑1α), and 3‑methyladenine (a specific inhibitor for mitophagy) were used to activate or block UCHL1, HIF‑1α, and mitophagy. Mitophagy, apoptosis, and mitochondrial function in chondrocytes were detected using immunofluorescence, TUNEL staining, and flow cytometry. Moreover, the oxygen consumption rate of chondrocytes was measured using the Seahorse XF 96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer. UCHL1 expression was increased in hypoxia, which in turn regulated mitophagy and apoptosis in the chondrocytes. Further studies revealed that UCHL1 mediated hypoxia‑regulated mitophagy in the chondrocytes. The CRISPRa module was utilized to activate UCHL1 effectively for 7 days; endogenous activation of UCHL1 accelerated mitophagy, inhibited apoptosis, and maintained mitochondrial function in the chondrocytes, which was mediated by HIF‑1α. Taken together, UCHL1 could block apoptosis in chondrocytes via upregulation of HIF‑1α-mediated mitophagy and maintain mitochondrial function. These results indicate the potential of UCHL1 activation using the CRISPRa system for the regeneration of cartilage tissue.

Experimental Study on the Biological Outcome of Auricular Cartilage and Costal Cartilage at Different Time Periods After Autologous Cartilage Rhinoplasty

Since autologous cartilage is a good transplant material, it is widely used in various fields of clinical medicine. In this study, we collected clinical specimens obtained at different numbers of years after transplantation and used histologic staining to explore the post-transplantation changes in auricular cartilage and costal cartilage. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent primary autologous cartilage rhinoplasty and secondary rhinoplasty from 2017 to 2021, and the remaining autologous cartilage tissue after surgery was used for histologic testing. As time progressed after transplantation, the density of costal chondrocytes decreased first and then increased, while the secretion of type II collagen and extracellular matrix both decreased slightly. There was a clear boundary between the cartilage tissue and the surrounding connective tissue, and there was no ingrowth of blood vessels in the cartilage. Auricular cartilage showed a decrease in the integrity of the matrix edge. Moreover, local fibrosis was visible, and vascular ingrowth was observed at the edge of the cartilage. The content of type II collagen first increased and then decreased, and the cell secretion function was lower than that of normal chondrocytes. The results of the study suggest that the histologic outcome of elastic cartilage after transplantation is significantly different from that of hyaline cartilage. Moreover, costal cartilage was more stable than auricular cartilage after transplantation.

Diagnosis and Management of Common Presentations of Posttraumatic Nasal Deformity: A Narrative Review

Posttraumatic nasal deformity (PTND) is a surgical challenge for the otolaryngologist and plastic surgeon. Various classifications and management algorithms have been proposed without reaching much consensus in terms of definition and management.

Methods

We present a narrative review aimed to define PTND and consolidate current knowledge regarding its diagnosis, subtypes, and treatment options.

Results

This report is a clinical overview of PTND. We also review recent studies that characterize different osteotomy approaches and techniques used for patients with PTND.

Conclusions

By providing a summary of the main challenges for PTND, we aim to add context to its variable presentation. We hope this broad overview will reinforce more effective communication between providers and promote patient understanding in order to ensure favorable long-term outcomes.

Complications Associated with Autologous Costal Cartilage Used in Rhinoplasty: An Updated Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the complications using autologous costal cartilage as grafts in rhinoplasty objectively and systematically with newly published literature.

METHODS

The literature was searched systematically; included studies were published between July of 1990 and April of 2020. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty studies involving 1648 patients were included for meta-analysis. The pooled rates of complications were 3.05% of warping (95% CI 1.36-5.19%), 1.2% of resorption (95% CI 0.26-2.56%), 1.45% of infection (95% CI 0.34-3.06%), and 1.53% of contour irregularity (95% CI 0.53-2.88%). The revision rate was 2.25% (95% CI 0.96-3.9%). Regarding of donor-site morbidities, the rate of hypertrophic chest scar was 2.08% (95% CI 0.31-4.83%), and the rate of pneumothorax was 0% (95% CI 0-0.46%). The pooled rates of complications were 9.06% (95% CI 6.13-12.43%) at the recipient site when complications at the recipient site did not include revision surgery, 1.47% (95% CI 0.17-3.56%) at the donor site, and 15.13% (95%CI 11.03-19.69%) overall. The recipient-site adverse event rate was 12.44% (95% CI 8.98-16.33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Warping was found the most common complication after rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage. Revision after rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage was increased in these years. Donor-site complications increased the complication rate after rhinoplasty using autologous rib cartilage by 22%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Dorsal Augmentation: A Review of Current Graft Options

Background

Dorsal augmentation is one of the more complication-prone procedures in rhinoplasty, demanding ample skill and experience to produce an aesthetic and functional result. Numerous autologous grafts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic materials have been attempted for augmentation with varying success. Each graft material has its own unique properties that require varying surgical intricacies. The relative risks and benefits of these strategies and materials are also variable and must be weighed. Alloplastic implants are commonly used in eastern countries, but, due to different patient populations and complication profiles, have found less acceptance among western surgeons.

Methods

A PubMed search was done using the terms "dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty," "liquid rhinoplasty," and "grafts used for rhinoplasty." Publication dates ranging from 1957-2022 were included. Abstracts were screened for relevance, and references from each article were reviewed to identify further articles. Chapters on dorsal augmentation from two key rhinoplasty textbooks were also reviewed.

Results

A total of 79 articles and 2 textbooks were formally screened; of these, 65 resources were included. Findings were grouped under the headings "facial analysis," "ethnic factors in graft selection," "graft characteristics," "septal cartilage," "auricular cartilage," "costal cartilage," "diced cartilage grafts," "bone grafts," "soft tissue grafts," "nonsurgical/liquid rhinoplasty," and "alloplastic implants."

Conclusions

Current dorsal augmentation literature focuses on retrospective studies and expert experiences. There are limited quantitative and prospective studies present to delineate an ideal graft. With consistently advancing technology and knowledge of facial aesthetics, a surgeon must maintain a thorough understanding of the current graft and implant options to offer a specialized treatment plan for each deformity and patient.

Autologous Costal Cartilage Grafting for a Large Osteochondral Lesion of the Femoral Head: A 1-Year Single-Arm Study with 2 Additional Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

There is currently no ideal treatment for osteochondral lesions of the femoral head (OLFH) in young patients.

METHODS

We performed a 1-year single-arm study and 2 additional years of follow-up of patients with a large (defined as >3 cm 2 ) OLFH treated with insertion of autologous costal cartilage graft (ACCG) to restore femoral head congruity after lesion debridement. Twenty patients ≤40 years old who had substantial hip pain and/or dysfunction after nonoperative treatment were enrolled at a single center. The primary outcome was the change in Harris hip score (HHS) from baseline to 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), hip joint space width, subchondral integrity on computed tomography scanning, repair tissue status evaluated with the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, and evaluation of cartilage biochemistry by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping.

RESULTS

All 20 enrolled patients (31.02 ± 7.19 years old, 8 female and 12 male) completed the initial study and the 2 years of additional follow-up. The HHS improved from 61.89 ± 6.47 at baseline to 89.23 ± 2.62 at 12 months and 94.79 ± 2.72 at 36 months. The EQ VAS increased by 17.00 ± 8.77 at 12 months and by 21.70 ± 7.99 at 36 months (p < 0.001 for both). Complete integration of the ACCG with the bone was observed by 12 months in all 20 patients. The median MOCART score was 85 (interquartile range [IQR], 75 to 95) at 12 months and 75 (IQR, 65 to 85) at the last follow-up (range, 24 to 38 months). The ACCG demonstrated magnetic resonance properties very similar to hyaline cartilage; the median ratio between the relaxation times of the ACCG and recipient cartilage was 0.95 (IQR, 0.90 to 0.99) at 12 months and 0.97 (IQR, 0.92 to 1.00) at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ACCG is a feasible method for improving hip function and quality of life for at least 3 years in young patients who were unsatisfied with nonoperative treatment of an OLFH. Promising long-term outcomes may be possible because of the good integration between the recipient femoral head and the implanted ACCG.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Application of methylene blue combined with ropivacaine intercostal nerve block in postoperative analgesia of autologous costal cartilage augmentation rhinoplasty

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of methylene blue combined with ropivacaine intercostal nerve block on postoperative analgesia after autologous costal cartilage augmentation rhinoplasty.

METHODS

In this study 100 female patients who underwent autologous costal cartilage comprehensive augmentation rhinoplasty in Chongqing Huamei Plastic Surgery Hospital from April to November 2021 were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 50 cases in each group. In the experimental group methylene blue was combined with ropivacaine intercostal nerve block as patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), and the control group was ropivacaine intercostal nerve block combined with PCIA. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of resting and coughing at 6 h (T1), 24 h (T2), 48 h (T3), 72 h (T4) after surgery were recorded and evaluated. At the same time, the number and times of oral analgesics were recorded as well as nausea, vomiting, burning pain and paresthesia.

RESULTS

The VAS scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group at all time points. At 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery, the VAS score of the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The VAS score of calm 72 h after surgery in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The analgesic effect of the two groups was better when they coughed after surgery. At 6 h after surgery, the VAS score of coughing in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05); At 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after surgery, the VAS score of the coughing state in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Intercostal nerve block with methylene blue combined with ropivacaine can achieve good postoperative analgesic effects in augmentation rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage.

Update on Rhinoplasty Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures. The current study aimed to use bibliometric analysis to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate rhinoplasty research and determine the research trends and hotspots in this field.

METHODS

Publications on rhinoplasty research were extracted from the web of science core collection database. VOSviewer1.6.18 was used to analyze the co-authorship, co-occurrence, the citations of countries, institutions, authors, and hotspot keywords, and the journals in which the studies were published.

RESULTS

On April 8, 2022, 11,130 records of rhinoplasty research published between 1945 and 2021 were collected. Most of the retrieved studies were original research articles (n = 8309, 74.65%), and 1950 (17.52%) papers were available in an open-access format. The annual publication output increased annually. Research groups in the USA were the main contributors and had a strong academic reputation in this field. University of California System was the institution with the greatest contribution (4.17%, with 464 publications). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (1248 publications, 11.21%) published the most research in this field and was also the most frequently co-cited journal (33,894 citations, total link strength [TLS]: 722,672). R. J. Rohrich (140 publications) was the most prolific author and the most frequently co-cited author (2562 citations, TLS: 56,624). The following rhinoplasty research hotspots were identified: cleft rhinoplasty, nasal reconstruction, nasal tip, revision rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, nasal prosthesis, hyaluronic acid, and preservation rhinoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide a general overview of the major directions in rhinoplasty research. Preservation rhinoplasty, rib graft, nonsurgical rhinoplasty, hyaluronic acid, FACE-Q, fillers, and three-dimensional technology may be future research hotspots.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Need for Innovation in Rhinoplasty

Rhinoplasty is a challenging surgery and results are not always perfect. There are many obstacles to achieving optimal results. Among these are inadequate instrumentation, the unpredictability of healing, imprecise planning, and many more. Furthermore, selecting patients who can most benefit from surgery is equally important. In this article, some of the more pressing areas of rhinoplasty that need innovation are discussed. From proper patient selection, to advances in education, to the standardization of training programs, to the development of sophisticated implants, the future of rhinoplasty surgery lies in continued creativity and innovation.

Efficacy and safety of equine cartilage for rhinoplasty: a multicenter double-blind non-inferiority randomized confirmatory clinical trial

Background

The efficacy and safety of equine cartilage as a competent xenograft material for rhinoplasty were evaluated and compared to the outcomes of rhinoplasty using silicone implants.

Methods

We performed a multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority, and randomized confirmatory study. Fifty-six patients were randomized 1:1 to the study group (using MegaCartilage-E) and control group (using silicone implants). The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) score, photo documentation, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and adverse event data were obtained until 12 months after surgery. The primary efficacy, which is the change in ROE score 6 months after surgery, was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat set. The secondary efficacy was evaluated in the per-protocol set by assessing the change in ROE score 6 and 12 months after surgery and nasofrontal angle, the height of the nasion, and GAIS 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Results

The change in ROE score of the study group was non-inferior to that of the control group; it increased by 24.26±17.24 in the study group and 18.27±17.60 in the control group (p=0.213). In both groups, all secondary outcome measures increased, but there was no statistical difference. In the safety set, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 10 patients (35.71%) in the study group and six patients (21.43%) in the control group (p=0.237). There were 13 adverse device events in the study group and six adverse device events in the control group (p=0.515).

Conclusion

Processed equine cartilage can be used effectively and safely as xenograft material for rhinoplasty.

An update on rib grafting in rhinoplasty: which rib is right?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In revision or posttraumatic rhinoplasty, the quantity and quality of septal cartilage available for grafting is often deficient and auricular cartilage often provides insufficient strength for structural nasal reconstruction. Accordingly, rib cartilage serves as a reliable, abundant source of cartilage for grafting. However, the various sources of rib cartilage carry respective benefits and weaknesses. This review examines recent studies, novel applications and a comparison of the primary sources of rib cartilage, including autologous cartilage, irradiated cadaveric rib and fresh frozen cadaveric cartilage.

RECENT FINDINGS

Options for rib cartilage include autologous, irradiated cadaveric rib, and more recently, reports on fresh frozen cadaveric cartilage. Studies continue to conclude that autologous and irradiated donor cartilage carry equivalent results, have similar rates of complication and have a comparable cost profile.

SUMMARY

Regardless of the source, rib cartilage plays an important role in structural rhinoplasty, especially in revision cases. Although the risks, benefits and long-term results of autologous and radiated homologous cartilage have been evaluated in observational studies, fresh frozen rib cartilage will need further follow up before widespread use, although preliminary literature shows promise.

The Ageing Nose: Challenges and Solutions

Purpose of Review

Rhinoplasty has traditionally been considered an elective procedure for younger patients. However, increasingly older patients are undergoing nasal surgery for both functional and aesthetic indications. We provide an overview of the common problems with rhinoplasty in the elderly and the surgical techniques that can be reliably utilised to address them to produce predictable and longstanding results.

Recent Findings

Outcomes from studies of older rhinoplasty patients emphasise the need for a tailored approach that preserves natural structures. However, if reinforced structural support is required, especially in functional cases, grafting techniques such as septal extension grafts, spreader grafts and alar strut grafts are required. Furthermore, special consideration must be made for the nasal skin in older patients, and utilisation of dorsal onlay grafts is often necessary.

Summary

Surgery for the ageing nose is a complex challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon. Preoperative assessment is critical and must include detailed facial analysis that considers the amplification of facial asymmetry due to the ageing process and an appreciation that expectations in this population may differ from younger patients. A comprehensive understanding of the age-related anatomical changes in the nasal structure and the wide repertoire of operative techniques are required to restore form and function.

Fresh Frozen Rib Cartilage Grafts in Revision Rhinoplasty: A 9-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Revision rhinoplasty is undoubtedly one of the most challenging procedures in facial plastic surgery. The complexity is compounded when there is a paucity of native septal cartilage to perform the required framework reconstruction. Harvest of autologous costal cartilage can result in increased operative times and possible secondary-site complications such as contour irregularity, poor scarring, and even pneumothorax.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of the senior author's (R.J.R.) patients from 2011 to 2020 who underwent primary or revision rhinoplasty. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with fresh frozen off-the-shelf cartilage used in revision rhinoplasty only with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up. Outcomes for evaluation were warping, resorption, displacement, and infection.

RESULTS

The authors identified 226 patients who underwent open rhinoplasty with the use of fresh frozen rib cartilage grafts and met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 12.18 months (range, 6 months to 8 years). The majority of patients had undergone one prior rhinoplasty procedure (54 percent); however, 4 percent of patients had undergone four or more prior procedures on their nose. The overall infection rate was 2.7 percent ( n = 6), with the majority successfully managed with antibiotics alone (2.3 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

The results in revision rhinoplasty are significantly enhanced with the creation of a stable nasal framework using off-the-shelf, easily accessible, specifically tailored fresh frozen cadaveric rib grafts. The long-term outcomes and complication rate in this 9-year retrospective study demonstrates the safety of fresh frozen rib graft in comparison to autologous or irradiated rib graft.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Complications associated with irradiated homologous costal cartilage use in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) as an alternative source of graft material for rhinoplasty remains controversial because of the risk of complications. Herein, we aimed to perform a comprehensive assessment of complications associated with IHCC use in rhinoplasty through a meta-analysis of published studies.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible published studies, and we evaluated the complication rates of IHCC use in rhinoplasty. Published studies meeting the inclusion criteria included clinical studies involving at least 10 patients and assessing at least 1 postoperative long-term complication of rhinoplasty. Two investigators independently extracted data from the included studies using a standardized form. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The main outcomes were the rates of various complications, including the need for revision surgery.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving a total of 959 patients were analyzed. The complication rates were 2.07% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80%-5.23%) for warping, 1.77% (95% CI, 1.10%-2.83%) for infection, 1.34% (95% CI, 0.34%-5.16%) for resorption, 2.13% (95% CI, 0.86%-5.19%) for displacement, 2.99% (95% CI, 1.24%-7.03%) for revision, 0.16% (95% CI, 0.01%-3.25%) for extrusion, and 2.04% (95% CI, 1.02%-4.02%) for avulsion. All the included trials had moderate-to-high methodological quality except for small sample sizes and subjectively reporting of some complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall long-term complication rates associated with IHCC use in rhinoplasty were low. Revision and displacement were the most common complications at the one-year follow-up; surgeons should pay special attention to the risk of these complications. IHCC can serve as a reliable material for rhinoplasty and achieve good patient satisfaction.

The Use of Autologous and Cadaveric Grafts in Rhinoplasty: A Survey Study

BACKGROUND

Both autologous and cadaveric grafts are often used during rhinoplasty to create volume and provide support. Despite discussion in the literature comparing the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and complication rates between grafting options, it remains unclear which is the superior choice when considering availability, donor site morbidity, and cost. There is a little description of the current use of these materials amongst facial plastic surgeons.

METHODS

A 12 question survey was created, and IRB approval was obtained. The survey was distributed to practicing members of the AAFPRS via their membership listserv.

RESULTS

178 respondents completed the survey for an overall response rate of 17.5%. The most common rhinoplasty graft types used by respondents were autologous septal cartilage (96.6%), autologous auricular grafts (93.8%), autologous rib graft (ARG) (75.8%), and cadaveric rib graft (CRG) (56.7%). Patient comorbidities and performing more than 50 rhinoplasties per year were positively correlated with use of CRG grafts and concerns about complications and cost were negatively correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

While autologous septal and auricular cartilage remain the most common graft choices amongst surveyed facial plastic surgeons, a majority utilize cadaveric rib grafts in their practice. Patient comorbidities, surgery volume, concerns about graft complications, and cost were the chief factors associated with use of cadaveric grafts amongst survey respondents.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Dorsal Augmentation

To manage the deficient nasal dorsum, a thorough knowledge of dorsal augmentation techniques should be mastered by the rhinoplasty specialist. Indications for dorsal augmentation may arise in both primary and revision rhinoplasty presentations. To direct operative planning, a complete facial analysis, noting the importance of maintaining overall nasofacial balance, is essential. An array of techniques, including autologous and nonautologous (ie, allogeneic and synthetic) sources, have been used globally-each carrying its own advantages and disadvantages. The authors believe autologous grafts to be the optimal source for dorsal augmentation because of their biocompatibility and ability to produce natural and long-lasting outcomes.

Cost Utility Analysis of Costal Cartilage Autografts and Human Cadaveric Allografts in Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Human cadaveric allograft (HCA) and costal cartilage autograft (CCA) have been described for reconstruction during rhinoplasty. Neither are ideal due to infection, resorption, and donor site morbidity. The clear superiority of 1 graft over the other has not yet been demonstrated. This study assesses comparative costs associated with current grafting materials to better explore the cost ceiling for a theoretical tissue engineered implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cost utility analysis was performed. Initial procedure costs include physician fees (CPT 30420), hospital outpatient prospective payments, ambulatory surgical center payments, and fees for the following: rib graft (CPT 20910), hospital observation, and DRG (155) for inpatient admission. Additional costs for revision procedure, included the following fees: physician (CPT 30345), rib graft, hospital outpatient prospective payment, and ambulatory surgical center payments. Total costs under each scenario were calculated with and without the revision procedure. Comparison of total costs for each potential outcome to the estimated health utility value allowed for comparison across rhinoplasty subgroups.

RESULTS

The mean cost of primary outpatient rhinoplasty using HCA and CCA were $8075 and $8342 respectively. Revision outpatient rhinoplasty averaged $7447 and increased to $8228 if costal cartilage harvest was required. Hospital admission increased the cost of primary rhinoplasty with CCA to $8609 for observational admission and to $13653 for 1 day inpatient admission. Revision CCA rhinoplasty with an inpatient admission complicated by pneumothorax increased costs to $21 099.

CONCLUSION

Cost of rhinoplasty without hospitalization was similar between HCA and CCA and this cost represents the lower limit of a practical cost for an engineered graft. Considering complications such as need for revision or for admission after CCA due to surgical morbidity, the upper limit of cost for an engineered implant would approximately double.

Long-Term Outcomes of Inferior Meatus Augmentation Procedure to Treat Empty Nose Syndrome

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

We sought to report the long-term, symptom-focused, prospective outcomes in empty nose syndrome (ENS) patients after undergoing inferior meatus augmentation procedure (IMAP) through use of four validated questionnaires: Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire (ENS6Q), 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

A single-center prospective case series was performed for patients diagnosed with ENS who underwent IMAP between July 2017 and February 2020. Diagnosis of ENS was based on the following criteria: 1) reported discomfort with nasal breathing and/or paradoxical nasal obstruction after inferior turbinate reduction, 2) a positive ENS6Q score of at least 11, and 3) a positive cotton test. Questionnaire responses were recorded prior to surgery as well as 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Seventeen eligible patients were included. Mean ENS6Q scores were significantly reduced at all postoperative time points (p < .0001, p < .0001, p < .0001, p = .0003). Of the six ENS6Q subdomains, five (suffocation, dryness, sense of diminished airflow, nasal crusting, and nasal burning) were significantly reduced 1-year postoperatively (p < .0001, p = .0004, p = .0136, p = .0114, p = .0080, respectively). SNOT-22 scores were significantly reduced at all time points (p = .0021, p = .0227, p = .0004, and p = .0025). Of the SNOT-22 subdomains, the sleep subdomain was significantly reduced 1-year postoperatively (p = .0432). Low baseline GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were recorded at 7 and 9.4, respectively, and although scores at all postoperative time points were reduced, there was no statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

IMAP via implant of cadaveric rib cartilage provides significant, long-term improvements in ENS-specific and general sinonasal symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2736-E2741, 2021.

Fabrication and evaluation of an optimized xenogenic decellularized costal cartilage graft: preclinical studies of a novel biocompatible prosthesis for rhinoplasty

On account of the poor biocompatibility of synthetic prosthesis, millions of rhinoplasty recipients have been forced to choose autologous costal cartilage as grafts, which suffer from limited availability, morbidity at the donor site and prolonged operation time. Here, as a promising alternative to autologous costal cartilage, we developed a novel xenogeneic costal cartilage and explored its feasibility as a rhinoplasty graft for the first time. Adopting an improved decellularization protocol, in which the ionic detergent was substituted by trypsin, the resulting decellularized graft was confirmed to preserve more structural components and better mechanics, and eliminate cellular components effectively. The in vitro and in vivo compatibility experiments demonstrated that the decellularized graft showed excellent biocompatibility and biosecurity. Additionally, the functionality assessment of rhinoplasty was performed in a rabbit model, and the condition of grafts after implantation was comprehensively evaluated. The optimized graft exhibited better capacity to reduce the degradation rate and maintain the morphology, in comparison to the decellularized costal cartilage prepared by conventional protocol. These findings indicate that this optimized graft derived from decellularized xenogeneic costal cartilage provides a new prospective for future investigations of rhinoplasty prosthesis and has great potential for clinical application.

Cadaveric Costal Cartilage Grafts in Rhinoplasty and Septorhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes and Complications

ABSTRACT

Irradiated cadaveric costal cartilage (CC) has been utilized as an alternative to autologous cartilage (AC) in functional and aesthetic nasal surgery. The impact of graft choice between AC and CC on functional outcomes in rhinoplasty has yet to be studied. A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify comparative studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of CC in nasal surgery. Functional and aesthetic outcomes and complications were reviewed and compared between AC and CC. Meta-analytic comparisons were performed when appropriate using data from comparative studies using a random-effects model. Four studies met inclusion criteria. The indication for surgery was functional in the majority of cases, and 34.6% of cases were revision rhino- or septorhinoplasties. Disparate data across studies prevented meta-analysis on functional outcomes; however, qualitative review of function outcomes demonstrated comparable outcomes between the CC and AC groups. No differences in graft infection, warping, and resorption rates were detected. Analysis of all graft-related complications was higher in the CC group (P = 0.02); however, when AC donor site-related complications were included, no significance between the two groups was observed. In conclusion, limited, high quality data was available for analysis. Of the available studies, this systematic review suggest that the use of AC or CC may lead to comparable results in terms of functional outcomes. More long-term studies directly comparing AC and CC functional outcomes would be welcomed.

Efficacy and Safety of Lyophilized Articular Cartilage Matrix as an Injectable Facial Filler

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an injectable lyophilized articular cartilage matrix (LACM) which is in the form of cartilage powder that may increase the convenience of use and become unaffected by donor site morbidity as a potential filler.

METHODS

The safety test was conducted using 20 rabbits with an intravascular embolization model. Commonly used commercial hyaluronic acid (HA), acellular dermal matrix (ADM), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and polylactic acid (PLA) products were selected for comparison of efficacy and adverse effect of LACM. The efficacy test was performed using 30 mice subcutaneous buttock-injection model. Gross assessments of the changes in size of injected materials and histological examinations were conducted.

RESULTS

Regarding the safety test, in one rabbit in the HA group, complete blurring occurred in the left eye, and necrosis of the posterior auricular artery was observed in one rabbit in the ADM group. In the ADM, severe ecchymosis around the injection sites was observed, and the bruises lasted longer than in the other groups. The LACM exhibited faster bruise resolution. Comparing the changes in size between weeks 4 and 12 in the mouse model, no significant changes in size were observed in the LACM (p = 0.359), HA (p = 0.421), and ADM (p = 0.097), but a significant change was observed in the PMMA (p = 0.001). In the histological examination, LACM exhibited well-demarcated margins with good biocompatibility.

CONCLUSION

The LACM shows potential as a facial filler according to the in vivo safety and efficacy tests LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Septorhinoplasty and Septoplasty: Outcomes of a Large Cohort Using Autologous Versus Homologous Cartilage, 1999-2019

This study describes the complication rate and use of autologous and/or homologous cartilage in a large 20-year cohort of septo(rhino)plasty surgeries in a Dutch hospital, in relation to postoperative complications of septo(rhino)plasty surgery described in previous studies. A retrospective medical chart review was conducted. 2606 patients, mean age 34.7 (± 13.2) and 59.9% male, underwent primary or revision septo(rhino)plasty surgery from 01/01/1999 to 01/09/2019. Follow-up was known in 1384 of 2606 patients (53.1%) with a mean duration of 47.5 months. Complication registration was complete for 1774 patients. The overall complication rate was 270 out of 1774 (15.2%). The use of autologous costal cartilage (ACC) was a risk factor for overall complication with an odds ratio (OR) of 11.1 (95% CI 0.03-0.30; P < 0.01) as compared to 5.9 (95% CI 0.06-0.45; P < 0.01) when using homologous costal cartilage (HCC). Infections were more likely when ACC (5/26 [19.2%]) was used than when HCC (1/28 [3.6%]) was used. Notable resorption of cartilage was more likely when HCC (9/28 [32.1%]) was used than when ACC (1/26 [3.8%]) was used. Both the use of autologous costal cartilage grafts (OR 11.1) and homologous costal cartilage grafts (OR 5.9) lead to an increased risk of complications. When choosing cartilage type for reconstruction in septo(rhino)plasty, it should be taken into account that both ACC and HCC are associated with a higher risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Recent advances in bioprinting technologies for engineering different cartilage-based tissues

Inadequate self-repair and regenerative efficiency of the cartilage tissues has motivated the researchers to devise advanced and effective strategies to resolve this issue. Introduction of bioprinting to tissue engineering has paved the way for fabricating complex biomimetic engineered constructs. In this context, the current review gears off with the discussion of standard and advanced 3D/4D printing technologies and their implications for the repair of different cartilage tissues, namely, articular, meniscal, nasoseptal, auricular, costal, and tracheal cartilage. The review is then directed towards highlighting the current stem cell opportunities. On a concluding note, associated critical issues and prospects for future developments, particularly in this sphere of personalized medicines have been discussed.

An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models

Some of the earliest success in de novo tissue generation was in bone tissue, and advances, facilitated by the use of endogenous and exogenous progenitor cells, continue unabated. The concept of one health promotes shared discoveries among medical disciplines to overcome health challenges that afflict numerous species. Carefully selected animal models are vital to development and translation of targeted therapies that improve the health and well-being of humans and animals alike. While inherent differences among species limit direct translation of scientific knowledge between them, rapid progress in ex vivo and in vivo de novo tissue generation is propelling revolutionary innovation to reality among all musculoskeletal specialties. This review contains a comparison of bone deposition among species and descriptions of animal models of bone restoration designed to replicate a multitude of bone injuries and pathology, including impaired osteogenic capacity.

Multicenter Pilot Study to Assess a Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Implant for Functional and Aesthetic Septorhinoplasty

Importance: A validated biomaterial would have several medical advantages in septorhinoplasties requiring a large-volume graft such as avoiding donor site morbidity, making ambulatory surgery possible, and reducing surgical costs. Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of a ceramic to treat saddle and crooked noses. The main endpoint was the biocompatibility of the implant. The secondary endpoint was its functional and aesthetic efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The nasal septum (NASEPT) study is a pilot multicenter noncomparative prospective phase IIa clinical trial. The biomaterial tested was a biphasic calcium phosphate implant composed of 75% hydroxyapatite and 25% beta tri calcium phosphate. This versatile material can be used to replace septal skeleton when it is absent or nonusable. We included 25 patients with a multifractured osseous and cartilaginous framework after several traumas or surgeries. The implant placement technique was identical to an extracorporeal septoplasty through the external approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary endpoint was the occurrence of expected adverse and severe adverse events. The secondary endpoints were clinical functional and aesthetic results and histological microscopic modifications. Results: Any extrusion, infection, pain, and epistaxis were observed. All implants were placed in a sagittal, straight, and solid position without extralobular depression. Comparisons between pre- and postoperative symptoms showed that nasal comfort (p < 10^-4) and quality of life (p < 10^-4) were dramatically improved in all patients. The nasolabial angle (p = 0.047) and the columellar projection (p = 0.024) were improved after surgery. Histological data showed little submucosal inflammation at 6 months with well-differentiated epithelium. The mean follow-up was 23 months: three patients underwent revision surgery for functional or aesthetic details and four implants were removed (16%) owing to a foreign body reaction between 17 and 74 months. Conclusion and Relevance: The NASEPT implant meets functional and aesthetic requirements in complex septorhinoplasties but its long-term biocompatibility needs to be improved. It could potentially avoid donor site morbidity.