Tumor Histological Grade and Immunotherapy Response in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The effects of HIV and oncogenic human papillomavirus on the tumor immune microenvironment of penile squamous cell carcinoma

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) occurs more frequently in some developing countries compared to developed countries. Infection with HIV and/or high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) are risk factors for penile cancer development. The tumor microenvironment of PSCC may predict prognosis and may inform on the best targets for immunotherapy. We evaluated the immune microenvironment of penile tumors histologically, and determined whether and/or how HIV and/or hrHPV infections affect this tumor microenvironment. We conducted a prospective analytical cross-sectional study in which penile cancer tumors from 35 patients presenting at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia were histologically staged and assessed for presence of tumor infiltrating immune cells and expression of immune checkpoints. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate immune checkpoints and infiltrating immune cells, while multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction was used for hrHPV genotyping. The median age of all participants was 55 years. About 24% had advanced histological stage, 83% were HIV+, and 63% had hrHPV detected in their tumors using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. PDL1 expression was significantly higher in HIV- participants than HIV+ participants (p = 0.02). Tumors with multiple hrHPV infections had a significantly higher number of cells expressing TIM3 than those with one hrHPV (p = 0.04). High grade tumors had a significantly higher infiltrate of FoxP3+ cells (p = 0.02), CD68+ cells (p = 0.01), CD163+ cells (p = 0.01), LAG3+ cells (p = 0.01), PD1+ cells (p = 0.01) and TIM3+ cells (p = 0.03) when compared with low grade tumours. There was significant moderate to strong positive correlation of cells expressing PD1 and LAG3 (⍴ = 0.69; p = 0.0001), PD1 and TIM3 (⍴ = 0.49; p = 0.017) and TIM3 and LAG3 PDL1 (⍴ = 0.61; p = 0.001). In conclusion, the tumor microenvironment of penile squamous cell carcinoma seems to be affected by both HIV and HPV infections. TIM3 appears to be a potential therapeutic target in PSCC patients with hrHPV infections.

Allergy History and Immunotherapy Response in Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the association between patient-reported allergy history and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) response in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

Data were collected from the electronic medical records on baseline age, sex, allergy history, human papillomavirus status, T-stage, N-stage, smoking status, and survival for patients with and without an allergy history. The primary outcome was ICI response defined as complete or partial response by the RECIST criteria. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare rates and odds of ICI response. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare survival between groups.

RESULTS

Our study included 52 patients with an allergy history and 36 patients without an allergy history. The groups were similar in age, sex, HPV status, smoking status, and T- and N-stage. Patients with an allergy history (17/52, 32.1%) had a greater ICI response rate than patients without allergy history (4/36, 11.1%) (P = .02). After adjusting for HPV, patients with allergies had 3.93 (1.19-13.00) times increased odds of ICI response compared to patients without allergies. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 and 4.2 months for patients with and without an allergy history respectively (log-rank, P = .04). The median overall survival was 25.0 and 11.1 months for patients with and without an allergy history respectively (log-rank, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported allergy history was associated with ICI response in patients with RMHNSCC, underscoring the potential clinical utility of allergy history in estimating ICI response.

Prognostic nutritional index predicts the prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC). However, their efficacy is variable, and there are still no effective and convenient biomarkers to identify and assess their efficacy. In recent years, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and other commonly used biomarkers still cannot meet clinical needs. PNI is easy to obtain and its predictive value for the prognosis of immunotherapy has been confirmed in many cancer species, but the relationship between PNI and the efficacy of immunotherapy for esophageal cancer is still unclear. Therefore, this study aims to explore the predictive value of PNI in advanced esophageal cancer treated with ICIs.

Methods

The clinicopathological features of 78 patients with advanced EC who received immunotherapy in the 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team from September 2018 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The laboratory test results within 10 days prior to the start of ICI treatment were recorded, including absolute lymphocyte count and albumin (ALB) level. Meanwhile, the effects of pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and body mass index (BMI) on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced EC were analyzed.

Results

The median age of the enrolled patients was 58 years, and 38 patients (48.7%) received second-or-later-line therapy. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 7.4 months and 13 months, respectively. The mPFS and mOS were 8.8 months and 15 months, respectively, in the high baseline PNI subgroup, which were significantly higher than those in the low baseline PNI subgroup (4.7 and 8.2 months, respectively; both P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that low baseline PNI was an independent predictor of poor PFS [hazard studio (HR) =0.35, 95% CI: 0.14-0.85, P=0.020) and poor OS (HR =0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.99, P=0.047) and treatment line was an independent predictor of PFS. Baseline BMI was not significantly associated with prognosis.

Conclusions

PNI is a simple and effective biomarker for predicting the prognosis of immunotherapy in patients with advanced EC, although further prospective studies are warranted.