Wrong-Site Surgery, Retained Surgical Items, and Surgical Fires : A Systematic Review of Surgical Never Events

Call me Ishmael: addressing the white whale of team communication in the operating room with labelled surgical caps at an academic medical centre

INTRODUCTION

Effective communication in the operating room (OR) is crucial. Addressing a colleague by their name is respectful, humanising, entrusting and associated with improved clinical outcomes. We aimed to enhance team communication in the perioperative environment by offering personalised surgical caps labelled with name and provider role to all OR team members at a large academic medical centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental, uncontrolled, before-and-after quality improvement study. A survey regarding perceptions of team communication, knowledge of names and roles, communication barriers, and culture was administered before and after cap delivery. Survey results were measured on a 5-point Likert Scale; descriptive statistics and mean scores were compared. All cause National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) morbidity and mortality outcomes for surgical specialties were examined.

RESULTS

1420 caps were delivered across the institution. Mean survey scores increased for knowing the names and roles of providers around the OR, feeling that people know my name and feeling comfortable communicating without barriers across disciplines. The mean score for team communication around the OR is excellent was unchanged. The highest score both before and after was knowing the name of an interdisciplinary team member is important for patient care. A total of 383 and 212 providers participated in the study before and after cap delivery, respectively. Participants agreed or strongly agreed that labelled surgical caps made it easier to talk to colleagues (64.9%) while improving communication (66.0%), team culture (60.5%) and patient care (56.8%). No significant differences were noted in NSQIP outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalised labelled surgical caps are a simple, inexpensive tool that demonstrates promise in improving perioperative team communication. Creating highly reliable surgical teams with optimal communication channels requires a multifaceted approach with engaged leadership, empowered front-line providers and an institutional commitment to continuous process improvement.

A perioperative overview of a retained surgical swab in spinal surgery: Case report and prevention protocol

INTRODUCTION

Retained wound swabs although classified as a 'never event' and well documented in many surgical specialties are uncommon in spinal surgery. The aim of this article is to highlight the perioperative circumstances of an incident of a retained surgical swab and present a prevention protocol, in an attempt to eliminate its incidence.

CASE REPORT

The perioperative management of a 53-year-old male undergoing spinal surgery in whom a surgical swab was retained is reported. In addition to existing safety procedures such as the World Health Organization checklist, a Retained Surgical Swab-Prevention Protocol was implemented in our hospital and is presented to eliminate the occurrence of this 'never event' occurring again.

CONCLUSION

Retained surgical swabs or instruments are rare in spinal surgery occurring mostly in the lumbar spine, during emergency and prolonged procedures in patients with high body mass index. Maintaining a high index of suspicion and utilising a prevention protocol will prevent further harm to the patient.

The Retained Surgical Items Risk Assessment Scale: Development and Psychometric Characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Retained surgical items in operating rooms (ORs) continue to contribute significantly to medical errors. The first step in addressing the problem of retained surgical items is to identify the main risk factors. Identification of risk factors can impact OR standards and reduce such errors.

METHODS

The research included 270 participants. The data of the study were collected with the Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Form, Operating Room Count Control Form and the Retained Surgical Items Risk Assessment Scale developed. In the analysis of the data, Content Validity Index, Cronbach α, item-total score correlation, Kuder-Richardson, Kappa, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The Content Validity Index of the scale was 0.92. Kappa value was 0.993. The explained variance in the exploratory factor analysis of the scale was 50.03%. After confirmatory factor analysis, two factors were obtained for the final version of the 15 items. Factors had been determined as "Count and Surgery" and "Equipment". Among the subdimensions of the scale, Cronbach's α values were between 0.742 and 0.760, and 0.722 for the entire scale. When the ROC analysis results were examined, the cut-off point was ≥8, the specificity was 93.13%, and the sensitivity was 87.50%. The area under the ROC curve was calculated as 0.938.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale was presented as a valid and reliable measurement tool developed to assess the Retained Surgical Items Risk in ORs. If high-risk patients are checked and necessary precautions are taken before leaving the ORs, the incidence of retained surgical items can be significantly reduced.

Importance-Performance Analysis of Patient-Safety Nursing in the Operating Room: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

This study attempted to assess the perceived importance and performance of patient-safety nursing among operating room (OR) nurses and to identify the "concentrate here" level using importance-performance analysis (IPA). The goal was to identify the educational priorities of patient-safety nursing and to use it as foundational data to develop educational programs.

Methods

The IPA of patient-safety nursing (infection control, patient identification, specimen management, surgical coefficient, medical equipment and supplies, high-alert medicines, and damage prevention) was surveyed online for nurses in general hospitals in Korea, and the data of 47 participants were analyzed. Differences in the importance and performance of patient-safety nursing were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test, and IPA was conducted to identify areas on which improvement efforts should be focused.

Results

Within the six areas of OR patient-safety nursing, notable differences in importance and performance were observed in infection control and surgical count areas. The IPA revealed specific items that require "concentrate here", including handwashing, checking the cleanliness and sterility of medical equipment, and conducting 5-Rights checks before administering high-alert medications.

Conclusion

Regular training for OR nurses should encompass preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative infection control, as well as appropriate surgical counts. In particular, training, monitoring, feedback, and intervention should be provided on hand hygiene, sterilization maintenance, and accurate administration of high-alert medications, which are items included in "concentrate here".

The frequency and reasons for missed nursing care in Australian perioperative nurses: A national survey

AIM

To describe Australian perioperative nurses' reported frequency and reasons for missed nursing care in the operating room.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional online survey conducted in March-April 2022.

METHODS

A census of Australian perioperative nurses who were members of a national professional body were invited to complete a survey that focussed on their reported frequency of missed nursing care and the reasons for missed nursing care in the operating room using the MISSCare Survey OR.

RESULTS

In all, 612 perioperative nurses completed the survey. The perioperative and intraoperative nursing care tasks reported as most frequently missed included time-intensive tasks and communication with multiple surgical team members present. The most frequently reported reasons for missed care were staffing-related (e.g. staff number, skill mix, fatigue and complacency) and affected teamwork. There were no significant differences in the frequency of missed care based on perioperative nurse roles. However, there were statistically significant differences between nurse management, circulating/instrument nurses and recovery room nurses in reasons for missed care.

CONCLUSIONS

Much of the missed care that occurs in the operating room is related to communication practices and processes, which has implications for patient safety.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Understanding the types of nursing care tasks being missed and the reasons for this missed care in the operating room may offer nurse managers deeper insights into potential strategies to address this situation.

REPORTING METHOD

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition System for Preventing Wrong-Site Upper Limb Surgery

Our image recognition system employs a deep learning model to differentiate between the left and right upper limbs in images, allowing doctors to determine the correct surgical position. From the experimental results, it was found that the precision rate and the recall rate of the intelligent image recognition system for preventing wrong-site upper limb surgery proposed in this paper could reach 98% and 93%, respectively. The results proved that our Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition System (AIIRS) could indeed assist orthopedic surgeons in preventing the occurrence of wrong-site left and right upper limb surgery. At the same time, in future, we will apply for an IRB based on our prototype experimental results and we will conduct the second phase of human trials. The results of this research paper are of great benefit and research value to upper limb orthopedic surgery.

The Incidence of Retained Objects in Intraoperative X-rays for Missing Counts in Plastic Surgery: We Should Do Better

Background

In the event of incorrect surgical counts, obtaining X-rays to rule out retained surgical items (RSI) is standard practice. However, these safeguards also carry risk. This study investigates the actual incidence of RSI in plastic reconstructive surgery (PRS) cases as measured on intraoperative X-rays and its associated modifiable risk factors.

Methods

X-rays with indication of "foreign body" in PRS procedures from 2012 to 2022 were obtained. Reports with "incorrect surgical counts" and associated perioperative records were retrospectively analyzed to determine the incidence of retained surgical items.

Results

Among 257 X-rays, 21.4% indicated incorrect counts during PRS operations. None were positive for RSIs. The average number of staff present was 12.01. This correlated to an average of 6.98 staff turnovers. The average case lasted 8.42 hours. X-rays prolonged the time under anesthesia by an average of 24.3 minutes. Free flap surgery had 49.1% prevalence of missing counts (lower extremity 25.5%, breast 20%, craniofacial 3.6%), followed by hand (14.5%), breast (10.9%), abdominal reconstruction (10.9%), craniofacial (9.1%), and cosmetic (5.4%).

Conclusions

Although X-rays for incorrect counts intend to prevent catastrophic sequela of inadvertent RSIs, our results suggest the true incidence of RSI in PRS is negligible. However, intraoperative X-rays have potentially detrimental and pervasive consequences for patients, including increased anesthesia time, radiation exposure, and higher overall cost. Addressing modifiable risk factors to minimize unnecessary intraoperative X-rays is imperative while also considering whether this modality is an effective and appropriate tool in PRS procedures with incorrect surgical counts.

Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey

INTRODUCTION

Medical errors still plague healthcare. Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) and ORBB-simulation (ORBBSIM) are innovative emerging technologies which continuously capture as well as categorize intraoperative data, team information, and audio-visual files, in effort to improve objective quality measures. ORBB and ORBBSIM have an opportunity to improve patient safety, yet a paucity of implementation literature exists. Overcoming implementation barriers is critical. This study sought to obtain rich insights while identifying facilitators and barriers to adoption of ORBB and ORBBSIM in alignment with Donabedian's model of health services and healthcare quality. Enrichment themes included translational performance improvement and real-world examples to develop sessions.

METHODS

Interprofessional OR staff were invited to complete two surveys assessing staff's perceptions using TeamSTEPPS's validated Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables, and inductive phenomenological content analysis was used for qualitative.

RESULTS

Survey 1 captured 71 responses from 334 invited (RR 21%) while survey 2 captured 47 responses from 157 (RR 29.9%). The T-TPQ score was 65.2, with Communication (70.4) the highest construct and Leadership (58.0) the lowest. Quality Improvement (QI), Patient Safety, and Objective Case Review were the most common perceived ORBB benefits. Trends suggested a reciprocal benefit of dual ORBB and ORBBSIM adoption. Trends also suggested that dual implementation can promote Psychological Safety, culture, trust, and technology comfort. The need for an implementation plan built on change management principles and a constructive culture were key findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings supported ORBB implementation themes from previous literature and deepened our understanding through the exploration of team culture. This blueprint provides a model to help organizations adopt ORBB and ORBBSIM. Outcomes can establish an empirical paradigm for future studies.

Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a "never event" that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device ("Melzi Sharps Finder®" or MSF) in effective detection of RSS.

METHODS

The first study consisted of determination of the presence of RSS or identification of RSS in an ex-vivo model (a container with hay in a laparoscopic trainer box). The second study consisted of determining presence of RSS in an in-vivo model (laparoscopy in live adult Yorkshire pigs) with 3 groups: C-arm, C-arm with MSF and MSF. The third study used similar apparatus though with laparotomy and included 2 groups: manual search and MSF.

RESULTS

In the first study, the MSF group had a higher rate of identification of a needle and decreased time to locate a needle versus control (98.1% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001; 1.64 min ± 1.12vs. 3.34 min ± 1.28, p < 0.001). It also had increased accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision (100% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001; 1.69 min ± 1.43 vs. 4.89 min ± 0.63, p < 0.001). In-the second study, the accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and time to reach this decision were comparable in each group (88.9% vs. 100% vs. 84.5%, p < 0.49; 2.2 min ± 2.2 vs. 2.7 min ± 2.1vs. 2.8 min ± 1.7, p = 0.68). In the third study, MSF group had higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision than the control (97.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001; 2.0 min ± 1.5 vs. 3.9 min ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that MSF use was independently associated with an accurate determination of the presence of a needle (OR 12.1, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MSF in this study's RSS models facilitated the determination of presence and localization of RSS as shown by the increased rate of identification of a needle, decreased time to identification and higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle. This device may be used in conjunction with radiography as it gives live visual and auditory feedback for users during the search for RSS.

Factors contributing to preventing operating room "never events": a machine learning analysis

BACKGROUND

A surgical "Never Event" is a preventable error occurring immediately before, during or immediately following surgery. Various factors contribute to the occurrence of major Never Events, but little is known about their quantified risk in relation to a surgery's characteristics. Our study uses machine learning to reveal and quantify risk factors with the goal of improving patient safety and quality of care.

METHODS

We used data from 9,234 observations on safety standards and 101 root-cause analyses from actual, major "Never Events" including wrong site surgery and retained foreign item, and three random forest supervised machine learning models to identify risk factors. Using a standard 10-cross validation technique, we evaluated the models' metrics, measuring their impact on the occurrence of the two types of Never Events through Gini impurity.

RESULTS

We identified 24 contributing factors in six surgical departments: two had an impact of > 900% in Urology, Orthopedics, and General Surgery; six had an impact of 0-900% in Gynecology, Urology, and Cardiology; and 17 had an impact of < 0%. Combining factors revealed 15-20 pairs with an increased probability in five departments: Gynecology, 875-1900%; Urology, 1900-2600%; Cardiology, 833-1500%; Orthopedics,1825-4225%; and General Surgery, 2720-13,600%. Five factors affected wrong site surgery's occurrence (-60.96 to 503.92%) and five affected retained foreign body (-74.65 to 151.43%): two nurses (66.26-87.92%), surgery length < 1 h (85.56-122.91%), and surgery length 1-2 h (-60.96 to 85.56%).

CONCLUSIONS

Using machine learning, we could quantify the risk factors' potential impact on wrong site surgeries and retained foreign items in relation to a surgery's characteristics, suggesting that safety standards should be adjusted to surgery's characteristics based on risk assessment in each operating room. .

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

MOH 032-2019.

A Contemporary Analysis of Closed Claims Related to Wrong-Site Surgery

BACKGROUND

Wrong-site surgeries are considered "never events" and continue to occur despite the implementation of the Universal Protocol by The Joint Commission in 2003.

METHODS

The authors reviewed closed claims data on wrong-site surgery between 2013 and 2020 from a medical malpractice company. The claims were classified by allegations made by claimants, the responsible services, the types of procedures, the injuries, and contributing factors. Researchers performed a descriptive analysis of the available variables and reviewed the clinical summary of each case.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2020, there were 68 wrong-site closed claims cases. The mean age of the patients was 55.7 (standard deviation 16.21) years, and 51.5% were female. The services most frequently responsible for these were Orthopedic (35.3%), Neurosurgery (22.1%), and Urology (8.8%). The most common types of procedures were spine and intervertebral disc surgery (22.1%), arthroscopy (14.7%), and surgery on muscles/tendons (11.8%). The severity of claims was higher in the inpatient setting compared to the ambulatory setting. The most common alleged injuries included the need for additional surgery (45.6%), pain (33.8%), mobility dysfunction (10.3%), worsened injury (8.8%), death (7.4%), and total loss (7.4%). The top contributing factors to wrong-site surgery were failure to follow policy/protocol (83.8%) and failure to review the medical records (41.2%). The mean closed claim value was $136,452.84, and 60.3% of cases were settled.

CONCLUSION

The risk of wrong-site surgeries is increased with spine surgeries, likely due to unique technical challenges. Further research is required to identify effective methods of prevention of these events.

Associations of wrong surgery with other critical healthcare quality and patient safety challenges: a cross-sectional nationwide study of 100 general hospitals in Spain

Wrong surgery (wrong-site, wrong-procedure, or wrong-patient surgery) is among the most feared patient safety problems in hospitals. We aimed to evaluate associations between numeric assessment of risk assigned to wrong surgery with that of other healthcare quality and patient safety challenges. This nationwide study collected information from healthcare quality experts in charge of a clinical quality and/or patient safety department in general hospitals of ≥ 150 beds in Spain. Out of the 100 included hospitals, the highest strength of associations were observed with risk priority number (RPN) for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, RPN for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients, RPN for incorrect patient identification, RPN for lack of informed consent for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, RPN for catheter-related bacteremia, and RPN for adverse events and injuries due to medical devices related to use and/or design. These results are of potential interest for designing combined and coordinated strategies to improve patient safety in hospitals.

Characteristics of retained foreign bodies and near-miss events in the operating room: a ten-year experience at one institution

PURPOSE

Retained foreign bodies (RFBs) are a major complication of surgical procedures. However, the efficacy of preventive measures is not well defined. This study investigates the characteristics of potential (near miss) and actual RFBs, and the contributions of routine practice for the prevention of RFB events.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of incident reports regarding near-miss and RFB events in patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia in our institution between October 2008 and November 2018.

RESULTS

Among 49,831 operations under general anesthesia, there were 106 (2.13/1000) near-miss events and 24 (0.48/1000) RFB events. Counting surgical materials and intraoperative X-rays detected the remaining items before completion of surgery in 59 (56%) and 15 (14%) cases, respectively. The operator or staff noticed the surgical materials in the remaining 32 (30%) near-miss events. RFBs included 4 sponges (17%), 4 instruments (17%), 4 needles (17%), and 12 miscellaneous items (50%). Of these, 12 (50%) RFBs were discovered on postoperative X-rays and 16 (67%) patients required operative removal. Four incidents (17%) with RFBs were attributable to ignoring count discrepancies during surgery.

CONCLUSION

The actual incidence of RFB events is higher than previously reported. A standardized counting protocol, communication among staff, and intra- and postoperative X-rays may contribute to the prevention and detection of RFBs.

Insurance Claims for Wrong-Side, Wrong-Organ, Wrong-Procedure, or Wrong-Person Surgical Errors: A Retrospective Study for 10 Years

OBJECTIVE

Serious adverse events, such as wrong-side, wrong-organ, wrong-procedure, or wrong-person errors, still occur despite the implementation of preventative measures. In France, we describe the claims related to such errors based on the database from one of the main insurance companies.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of claims declared between January 2007 and December 2017 to Relyens, a medical liability insurance company (Sham), was performed. Their database was queried using the following keywords: "wrong side," "wrong organ," and "wrong person."

RESULTS

We collected 219 claims (0.4% of the total claims). The main specialties involved were orthopedics (34% of cases), neurosurgery (14%), and dentistry (14%). The claims were related to wrong organ (44%), side (39%), identity (13%), or procedure (4%). Juridical entity involved were mainly public facility (69%), followed by private facility (19%) or private physician (10%). The mean number of annual claims made has decreased of 20% since the mandatory implementation of the checklist in 2010 (22 versus 17.5 events per year). The main risk factors identified according to the ALARM protocol were factor related to the team (87%) or to the task to accomplish (78%). A direct causal factor was involved in 20% of the files, the main one being the organization (43%) closely related to the medical file (36%). The settlement was performed by conciliation in 69% of the claim and in court in 30%. The compensation was higher during a court settlement.

CONCLUSIONS

Wrong-side, wrong-organ, wrong-procedure, or wrong-person surgical errors are rare but fully preventable by the implementation of a safety culture.

A Multicenter Collaborative Effort to Reduce Preventable Patient Harm Due to Retained Surgical Items

BACKGROUND

Unintentional retention of surgical items is severe but preventable patient harm in surgical procedures. One multicenter health care organization experienced a harm event due to retained surgical items (RSIs) every eight days in 2019-2020. The research team sought to reduce the incidence of harm due to RSIs, improve near-miss reporting, and increase process reliability in operating rooms across the organization.

METHODS

A total of 114 health care facilities in the organization were invited to participate in a multistate, multicenter patient safety initiative to reduce patient harm caused by RSIs. A national-level workgroup comprising various disciplines proposed an evidence-based best practice bundle with five elements: surgical stop, surgical debrief, visual counter, imaging, and reporting of deviations. The workgroup ensured that extensive education and support were accessible to all the participating sites. The researchers monitored the process reliability of bundle elements and improvement milestones of all the sites, along with rates of harm related to RSIs.

RESULTS

Implementing the evidence-based RSI reduction bundle across 114 health care facilities resulted in a 14.3% reduction in the rate of harm caused by RSIs and a 59.1% increase in RSI near-miss reporting. The compliance to the RSI bundle reached an average of 70.5%, and 63.2% of the facilities are actively performing Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycles to improve bundle compliance continually.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an RSI bundle can be done reliably, can improve near-miss reporting, and can reduce patient harm. Variation in process reliability between centers suggests the significance of overcoming cultural and organizational barriers.

Automatic detection of foreign body objects in neurosurgery using a deep learning approach on intraoperative ultrasound images: From animal models to first in-human testing

Objects accidentally left behind in the brain following neurosurgical procedures may lead to life-threatening health complications and invasive reoperation. One of the most commonly retained surgical items is the cotton ball, which absorbs blood to clear the surgeon’s field of view yet in the process becomes visually indistinguishable from the brain parenchyma. However, using ultrasound imaging, the different acoustic properties of cotton and brain tissue result in two discernible materials. In this study, we created a fully automated foreign body object tracking algorithm that integrates into the clinical workflow to detect and localize retained cotton balls in the brain. This deep learning algorithm uses a custom convolutional neural network and achieves 99% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and surpasses other comparable algorithms. Furthermore, the trained algorithm was implemented into web and smartphone applications with the ability to detect one cotton ball in an uploaded ultrasound image in under half of a second. This study also highlights the first use of a foreign body object detection algorithm using real in-human datasets, showing its ability to prevent accidental foreign body retention in a translational setting.

Risk Reduction Strategy to Decrease Incidence of Retained Surgical Items

BACKGROUND

Retained surgical items (RSIs) are rare but serious events associated with significant morbidity and costs. We assessed the effectiveness of radiofrequency (RF) detection technology and Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) in reducing the incidence of RSIs.

STUDY DESIGN

All RSIs reported to the New York Patient Occurrence Reporting and Tracking System at five large urban teaching hospitals from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed. In 2012, TeamSTEPPS training was provided to all perioperative staff at each site, and use of RF detection became required in all procedures. The incidence of events before and after the interventions were compared using odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 997,237 operative procedures were analyzed. After the interventions, the incidence of RSIs decreased from 11.66 to 5.80 events per 100,000 operations (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 0.50 [0.32 to 0.78]). The frequency of RSIs involving RF-detectable items decreased from 5.21 to 1.35 events per 100,000 operations (OR [95% CI] = 0.26 [0.11 to 0.60]). The difference in RSIs involving non-RF-detectable surgical items was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of RSIs was significantly lower during the time period after implementing RF detection technology and after TeamSTEPPS training, primarily driven by a decrease in retained RF-detectable items. RF detection technology may be worth pursuing for hospitals looking to decrease RSI frequency. The benefit of TeamSTEPPS training alone may not result in a reduction of RSIs.

Effect of Patient Safety Training Program of Nurses in Operating Room

PURPOSE

This study developed an in-service training program for patient safety and aimed to evaluate the impact of the program on nurses in the operating room (OR).

METHODS

A pretest-posttest self-controlled survey was conducted on OR nurses from May 6 to June 14, 2020. An in-service training program for patient safety was developed on the basis of the knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) theory through various teaching methods. The levels of safety attitude, cognition, and attitudes toward the adverse event reporting of nurses were compared to evaluate the effect of the program. Nurses who attended the training were surveyed one week before the training (pretest) and two weeks after the training (posttest).

RESULTS

A total of 84 nurses participated in the study. After the training, the scores of safety attitude, cognition, and attitudes toward adverse event reporting of nurses showed a significant increase relative to the scores before the training (p < .001). The effects of safety training on the total score and the dimensions of safety attitude, cognition, and attitudes toward nurses' adverse event reporting were above the moderate level.

CONCLUSION

The proposed patient safety training program based on KAP theory improves the safety attitude of OR nurses. Further studies are required to develop an interprofessional patient safety training program. In addition to strength training, hospital managers need to focus on the aspects of workflow, management system, department culture, and other means to promote safety culture.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and content validation of the Global Trigger Tool surgical module

OBJECTIVE

to translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Global Trigger Tool surgical module content for Brazil.

METHOD

this is methodological research, carried out between March/2018 and February/2019, following the steps of translation, synthesis, back-translation, validation by the Delphi technique, pre-test and presentation to developers. Two translators, two back-translators, six professionals participated in the expert committee. A pre-test was carried out with a retrospective analysis of 244 medical records of adult patients. The content validity index and Cronbach's alpha were determined for data analysis.

RESULTS

the translation and cross-cultural adaptation allowed adjustments of items for use in Brazil. The mean Content Validity Index was 1.38, and the degree of agreement among experts was 92.4%. Cronbach's alpha was 0.83 for the 11 surgical triggers and their guidelines.

CONCLUSION

the module was translated, cross-culturally adapted for Brazil, with high reliability to identify surgical adverse events.

How crises work: A model of error cause and effect in surgical practice

INTRODUCTION

Surgical crises have major consequences for patients, staff and healthcare institutions. Nevertheless, their aetiology and evolution are poorly understood outside the remit of root-cause analyses.

AIMS

To develop a crisis model in surgery in order to aid the reporting and management of safety critical events.

METHODS

A narrative review surveyed the safety literature on failure causes, mechanisms and effects in the context of surgical crises. Sources were identified using non-probability sampling, with selection and inclusion being determined by author panel consensus. The data underwent thematic analysis and reporting followed the recommendation of the SALSA framework.

RESULTS

Data from 133 sources derived five principal themes. Analysis suggested that surgical care processes become destabilized in a step-wise manner. This crisis chain is initiated by four categories of threat or risk: (i) the systems in which surgeons operate; (ii) surgeons' technical, cognitive and behavioural skills; (iii) surgeons' physiological and psychological state (operational condition); and (iv) professional culture. Once triggered, the crisis chain is driven by only three types of errors: Type I. Performance errors consist of failures to diagnose, plan or execute tasks; Type II. Awareness errors are failures to recognise, comprehend or extrapolate the impact of performance failures; Type III. Rescue errors represent failures to correct faulty performance. The co-occurrence of all three error types gives rise to harm, which can lead to a crisis in the absence of mitigating actions.

CONCLUSION

Surgical crises may be triggered by four categories of threat and driven by only three types of error. These may represent universal targets for safety interventions that create new opportunities for crisis management.

Hidden retained surgical sponge with intestinal migration: A rare case report

Introduction and importance

Retained surgical items are mistakenly left items used during surgery. They are not always radiopaque and in literature there are numbers of case reports that were not found by X ray. Transmigration of the retained surgical item to the small intestine is one of the possible outcomes rarely seen in patients.

Case presentation

we present a case 32-year-old male with a history of open appendectomy one year ago presented to the emergency department with fever and diffuse abdominal cramps, which worsened after meals.

Clinical discussion

Lab tests, abdominal and pelvis sonography, x-rays and CT scan and small intestine series all were unremarkable and only after defecation of a surgical gauze with blue marker, the diagnosis was made.

Conclusion

In all missed items at the end of operation standard counting protocols must be considered and if we couldn't find the missed item never forget the meticulous follow ups because of a great chance of non-opaque item existence, in extremely rare cases the sponge could entered the bowels without obstruction or perforation and eventually defecated.

•

Retained surgical items are mistakenly left items used during surgery.

•

Transmigration of the retained surgical item to the small intestine is one of the possible outcomes rarely seen in patients.

•

In all missed items at the end of operation standard counting protocols must be considered.

The Role of Humans in Surgery Automation

Innovation in healthcare promises unparalleled potential in optimizing the production, distribution, and use of the health workforce and infrastructure, allocating system resources more efficiently, and streamline care pathways and supply chains. A recent innovation contributing to this is robot-assisted surgeries (RAS). RAS causes less damage to the patient's body, less pain and discomfort, shorter hospital stays, quicker recovery times, smaller scars, and less risk of complications. However, introducing a robot in traditional surgeries is not straightforward and brings about new risks that conventional medical instruments did not pose before. For instance, since robots are sophisticated machines capable of acting autonomously, the surgical procedure's outcome is no longer limited to the surgeon but may also extend to the robot manufacturer and the hospital. This article explores the influence of automation on stakeholder responsibility in surgery robotization. To this end, we map how the role of different stakeholders in highly autonomous robotic surgeries is transforming, explore some of the challenges that robot manufacturers and hospital management will increasingly face as surgical procedures become more and more automated, and bring forward potential solutions to ascertain clarity in the role of stakeholders before, during, and after robot-enabled surgeries (i.e. a Robot Impact Assessment (ROBIA), a Robo-Terms framework inspired by the international trade system 'Incoterms', and a standardized adverse event reporting mechanism). In particular, we argue that with progressive robot autonomy, performance, oversight, and support will increasingly be shared between the human surgeon, the support staff, and the robot (and, by extent, the robot manufacturer), blurring the lines of who is responsible if something goes wrong. Understanding the exact role of humans in highly autonomous robotic surgeries is essential to map liability and bring certainty concerning the ascription of responsibility. We conclude that the full benefits the use of robotic innovations and solutions in surgery could bring to healthcare providers and receivers cannot be realized until there is more clarity on the division of responsibilities channeling robot autonomy and human performance, support, and oversight; a transformation on the education and training of medical staff, and betterment on the complex interplay between manufacturers, healthcare providers, and patients.

Pediatric surgical errors: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Medical errors were largely concealed prior to the landmark report "To Err Is Human". The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to determine the extent pediatric surgery defines and studies errors, and to explore themes among papers focused on errors in pediatric surgery.

METHODS

The methodological framework used to conduct this scoping study has been outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. In January 2020, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Oxford Level of Evidence was assigned to each study; only studies rated Level 3 or higher were included.

RESULTS

Of 3,064 initial studies, 12 were included in the final analysis: 4 cohort studies, and 8 outcome/audit studies. This data represented 5,442,000 aggregate patients and 8,893 errors. There were 6 different error definitions and 5 study methods. Common themes amongst the studies included a systems-focused approach, an increase in errors seen with increased complexity, and studies exploring the relationship between error and adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed multiple error definitions, multiple error study methods, and common themes described in the pediatric surgical literature. Opportunities exist to improve the safety of surgical care of children by reducing errors. Original Scientific Research Type of Study: Systematic Scoping Review Level of Evidence Rating: 1.

Successful laparoscopic removal of gossypiboma: A case report

Introduction and importance

Gossypiboma is defined as developing an exudative inflammatory process around retained foreign bodies (RFBs). This problem may be asymptomatic or present with severe systemic or regional symptoms. Traditionally, every RFB must be removed with a surgical procedure. In the era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic removal is a good choice for these problems.

Case presentation

A young woman was referred to us with intermittent vague abdominal pain and a history of open cholecystectomy. After initial imaging, we found a twisted string-like object in epigastrium. Considering clinical findings and imaging, the patient was taken to the operating room with a diagnosis of RFB. After an explorative laparoscopy, we found an encapsulated fibrotic mass around a surgical sponge with pus-like secretions.

Conclusion

After diagnosing either RFB or gossypiboma, surgical intervention is mandatory, even in asymptomatic patients. Laparoscopy can help the surgeon to remove the retained item safely. Also, decreased length of stay and postoperative pain are significant advantages of laparoscopic removal.

•

A young woman presented to us complaining of vague abdominal pain without any specific signs and symptoms.

•

After initial imaging, a twisted string-like radiopaque object was seen in the epigastrium.

•

The patient was operated with the aid of laparoscopy, and the retained sponge removed successfully.

Laparoscopic Removal of Retained Surgical Sponge After Caesarean Section: A Case Report

Gossypiboma or textiloma denotes the formation of a mass lesion due to the development of foreign body reactions around the retained surgical item in the body. Most of the cases are asymptomatic in the initial postoperative period. Due to the dense adhesions, most of the cases of intra-abdominal gossypiboma are treated by an open approach. Here we present a case of a 38-year-old lady with left iliac fossa pain one month after caesarean section. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen revealed gossypiboma. The patient was successfully treated with laparoscopic removal of the gossypiboma.

Tradução, adaptação transcultural e validação de conteúdo do módulo cirúrgico do Global Trigger Tool

RESUMO Objetivo: traduzir, adaptar transculturalmente e validar o conteúdo do módulo cirúrgico do Global Trigger Tool para o Brasil. Método: pesquisa metodológica, realizada entre março/2018 e fevereiro/2019, seguindo os passos de tradução, síntese, retrotradução, validação pela técnica Delphi, pré-teste e apresentação para os desenvolvedores. Participaram dois tradutores, dois retrotradutores, seis profissionais para o comitê de especialistas. Realizou-se o pré-teste com análise retrospectiva de 244 prontuários de pacientes adultos. Determinou-se o índice de validade de conteúdo e alfa de Cronbach para análise dos dados. Resultados: a tradução e a adaptação transcultural permitiram ajustes dos itens para uso no Brasil. O Índice de Validade de Conteúdo médio foi 1,38, e grau de concordância entre os especialistas, 92,4 %. O alfa de Cronbach foi 0,83 para os 11 triggers cirúrgicos e respectivas orientações. Conclusão: o módulo foi traduzido e adaptado transculturalmente para o Brasil, com alta confiabilidade para identificar eventos adversos cirúrgicos.

Defining and Studying Errors in Surgical Care: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the extent surgical disciplines categorize, define, and study errors, then use this information to provide recommendations for both current practice and future study.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The report "To Err is Human" brought the ubiquity of medical errors to public attention. Variability in subsequent literature suggests the true prevalence of error remains unknown.

METHODS

In January 2020, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Only studies with Oxford Level of Evidence Level 3 or higher were included.

RESULTS

Of 3,064 studies, 92 met inclusion criteria: 6 randomized controlled trials, 4 systematic reviews, 24 cohort, 10 before-after, 35 outcome/audit, 5 cross sectional and 8 case-control studies. Over 15,933,430 patients and 162,113 errors were represented. There were 6 broad error categories, 13 different definitions of error, and 14 study methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported prevalence of error varied widely due to a lack of standardized categorization, definitions, and study methods. Future research should focus on immediately recognizing errors to minimize harm.

Preventing Operating Room Fires: Impact of Surgical Drapes on Oxygen Contamination of the Operative Field

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to measure underdrape oxygen pooling, surgical site oxygen contamination, and time to restoration of 21% oxygen concentration after cessation of oxygen delivery by measuring oxygen concentration under simulated clinical conditions with various drapes.

METHODS

In a 2-part study, oxygen permeability of four differing surgical drapes was measured (Part A) and a mannequin was used to measure underdrape oxygen pooling and surgical site oxygen contamination (Part B). In Part A, a container of high concentration oxygen was sealed with a surgical drape. Oxygen concentrations on both sides of the drape were then measured over time to quantify drape oxygen permeability. Part B included a mannequin model draped for a hypothetical surgical site with oxygen administered by face mask. Oxygen concentration was measured at both the surgical site and under the drape nearest the surgical site.

RESULTS

Oxygen permeability varied significantly between drapes tested. The surgical site oxygen concentration ranged from 20% to 58% (P = 0.0001). The commonly used woven 100% cotton operating room (OR) towel was highly permeable. The plastic occlusive drape created an impermeable barrier, which did not allow for any oxygen contamination but created the longest time to return to 21% oxygen concentration at the underdrape site after cessation of oxygen delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical drapes have varying oxygen permeability and can lead to high concentration underdrape oxygen pooling. Oxygen contamination of the surgical site varies widely based on drape material and may reach dangerously high levels, especially with the cotton OR towel. Surgical drape selection may impact OR fire risk.

Long Term Rigid Retained Foreign Object After Breast Augmentation: A Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction: Retained foreign object (RFO) is a rare iatrogenic complication. This article presents an unprecedented case of a plastic RFO post-augmentation mammoplasty.

Case Presentation: We present the case of a 32-year-old woman, 8 years after breast augmentation surgery, with a 4 year history of a palpable migrating mass in the superior lateral quadrant of her right breast with fluctuating levels of pain. Imaging studies included mammography tests, sonographic examinations, a Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan, and a Computed Tomography scan, all of which did not identify any pathological findings. Exploratory surgery discovered a syringe-tip cover in the implant pocket.

Conclusion: Persistent complaints and symptoms accompanied by non-specific imaging studies warrant escalation of diagnostic methods, in line with a high awareness for the possibility of an RFO. As pocket lavage is a common practice in various surgeries, this report can serve as a valuable reminder for surgical teams to account for syringe covers and other disposable items at the end of all operations.

Preoperative Site Marking: Are We Adhering to Good Surgical Practice?

OBJECTIVES

Wrong-site surgery is a never event and a serious, preventable patient safety incident. Within the United Kingdom, national guidance has been issued to minimize the risk of such events. The mandate includes preoperative marking of all surgical patients. This study aimed to quantify regional variation in practice within general surgery and opinions of the surgeons, to help guide the formulation and implementation of a regional general surgery preoperative marking protocol.

METHODS

A SurveyMonkey questionnaire was designed and distributed to 120 surgeons within the Mersey region, United Kingdom. This included all surgical trainees in Mersey (47 registrars, 56 core trainees), 15 consultants, and 2 surgical care practitioners. This sought to ascertain their routine practice and how they would choose to mark for 12 index procedures in general surgery, if mandated to do so.

RESULTS

A total of 72 responses (60%) were obtained to the SurveyMonkey questionnaire. Only 26 (36.1%) said that they routinely marked all of their patients preoperatively. The operating surgeon marked the patient in 69% of responses, with the remainder delegating this task. Markings were visible after draping in only 55.6% of marked cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, surgeons may not be adhering to "Good Surgical Practice"; practice is widely variable and surgeons are largely opposed and resistant to marking patients unless laterality is involved. We suggest that all surgeons need to be actively engaged in the design of local marking protocols to gain support, change practice, and reduce errors.

Never events in orthopaedics: A nationwide data analysis and guidance on preventative measures

BACKGROUND

Never Events (NE) are serious clinical incidents that are wholly preventable if appropriate institutional safeguards are in place and followed. They are often used as a surrogate of the quality of healthcare delivered by an institution. Most NEs are surgical and orthopaedic surgery is one of the most involved specialties.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify common NE themes associated with orthopaedics within the National Health Service (NHS) of England.

METHOD

We conducted an observational study analysing the annual NE data published by the NHS England from 2012 to 2020 to collate all orthopaedic surgery-related NE and construct relevant recurring themes.

RESULTS

We identified 460 orthopaedic NE out of a total of 3247 (14.16%) reported NE to NHS England. There were 206 Wrong implants/prostheses under 8 different themes. Wrong hip and knee prosthesis were the commonest "wrong implants" (n = 94; 45.63% and n = 91; 44.17% respectively). There were 197 "Wrong-site surgery" incidents in 22 different themes. The commonest of these was the laterality problems accounting for 64 (32.48%) incidents followed by 63 (31.97%) incidents of wrong spinal level interventions. There were 18 (9.13%) incidents of intervention on the wrong patients and 17 (8.62%) wrong incisions. Retained pieces of instruments were the commonest retained foreign body with 15 (26.13%) incidents. The next categories were retained drill parts and retained instruments with 13 (22.80%) incidents each.

CONCLUSION

We identified 47 different themes of NE specific to orthopaedic surgery. Awareness of these themes would help in their prevention. Site marking can be challenging in the presence of cast and on operating on the digits and spine. Addition of a Real-time intra-operative implant scan to the National Joint Registry can avoid wrong implant selection while Fiducial markers, intraoperative imaging, O-arm navigation, and second time-out could help prevent wrong level spinal surgery.

Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management.

METHODS

Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical "sharps," a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of "sharps". Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview.

RESULTS

Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery.

CONCLUSION

The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events.

Communication failures contributing to patient injury in anaesthesia malpractice claims☆

BACKGROUND

Communication amongst team members is critical to providing safe, effective medical care. We investigated the role of communication failures in patient injury using the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database.

METHODS

Claims associated with surgical/procedural and obstetric anaesthesia and postoperative pain management for adverse events from 2004 or later were included. Communication was defined as transfer of information between two or more parties. Failure was defined as communication that was incomplete, inaccurate, absent, or not timely. We classified root causes of failures as content, audience, purpose, or occasion with inter-rater reliability assessed by kappa. Claims with communication failures contributing to injury (injury-related communication failures; n=389) were compared with claims without any communication failures (n=521) using Fisher's exact test, t-test, or Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

At least one communication failure contributing to patient injury occurred in 43% (n=389) out of 910 claims (κ=0.885). Patients in claims with injury-related communication failures were similar to patients in claims without failures, except that failures were more common in outpatient settings (34% vs 26%; P=0.004). Fifty-two claims had multiple communication failures for a total of 446 injury-related failures, and 47% of failures occurred during surgery, 28% preoperatively, and 23% postoperatively. Content failures (insufficient, inaccurate, or no information transmitted) accounted for 60% of the 446 communication failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication failure contributed to patient injury in 43% of anaesthesia malpractice claims. Patient/case characteristics in claims with communication failures were similar to those without failures, except that failures were more common in outpatient settings.

Analysis and outcomes of wrong site thyroid surgery

Background

In thyroid surgery, wrong-site surgery (WSS) is considered a rare event and seldom reported in the literature.

Case presentation

This report presents 5 WSS cases following thyroid surgery in a 20-year period. We stratified the subtypes of WSS in wrong target, wrong side, wrong procedure and wrong patient. Only planned and elective thyroid surgeries present WSS cases. The interventions were performed in low-volume hospitals, and subsequently, the patients were referred to our centres. Four cases of wrong-target procedures (thymectomies [n = 3] and lymph node excision [n = 1] performed instead of thyroidectomies) and one case of wrong-side procedure were observed in this study. Two wrong target cases resulting additionally in wrong procedure were noted. Wrong patient cases were not detected in the review. Patients experienced benign, malignant, or suspicious pathology and underwent traditional surgery (no endoscopic or robotic surgery). 40% of WSS led to legal action against the surgeon or a monetary settlement.

Conclusion

WSS is also observed in thyroid surgery. Considering that reports regarding the serious complications of WSS are not yet available, these complications should be discussed with the surgical community. Etiologic causes, outcomes, preventive strategies of WSS and expert opinion are presented.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01247-7.

Cryoneurolysis' outcome on pain experience (COPE) in patients with low-back pain: study protocol for a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Background

Low-back pain, including facet joint pain, accounts for up to 20 % of all sick leaves in DenmarkA proposed treatment option is cryoneurolysis. This study aims to investigate the effect of cryoneurolysis in lumbar facet joint pain syndrome.

Methods

A single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) is performed including 120 participants with chronic facet joint pain syndrome, referred to the Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital. Eligible patients receive a diagnostic anesthetic block, where a reduction of pain intensity ≥ 50 % on a numerical rating scale (NRS) is required to be enrolled. Participants are randomized into three groups to undergo either one treatment of cryoneurolysis, radiofrequency ablation or placebo. Fluoroscopy and sensory stimulation is used to identify the intended target nerve prior to administrating the above-mentioned treatments. All groups receive physiotherapy for 6 weeks, starting 4 weeks after treatment. The primary outcome is the patients’ impression of change in pain after intervention (Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)) at 4 weeks follow-up, prior to physiotherapy. Secondary outcomes are a reduction in low-back pain intensity (numeric rating scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D, SF-36) and level of function (Oswestry Disability Index), psychological perception of pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) and depression status (Major Depression Inventory).

Data will be assessed at baseline (T0), randomization (T1), day one (T2), 4 weeks (T3), 3 (T4), 6 (T5) and 12 months (T6).

Discussion

This study will provide information on the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis vs. the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation or placebo for patients with facet joint pain, and help to establish whether cryoneurolysis should be implemented in clinical practice for this patient population.

Trial registration

The trial is approved by the ethical committee of Central Jutland Denmark with registration number 1-10-72-27-19 and the Danish Data Protection Agency with registration number 666,852. The study is registered at Clinicaltrial.gov with the ID number NCT04786145.

Photographic Confirmation of Biopsy Sites Saves Lives

Quality photographic documentation of lesions prior to biopsy can decrease the risk of wrong site surgery, improve patient care, and save lives.

Fire in operating room: The adverse "never" event. Case report, mini-review and medico-legal considerations

The patient's security and safety represent a topic of great importance for public health that led several healthcare organizations in many Countries to share documents to promote risk management and preventing adverse events. Surgical Fire (SF) is an infrequent adverse event generally occurring in the operating room (OR) and consisting of a fire that occurs in, on, or around a patient undergoing a medical or surgical procedure. Here a medico-legal case involving a 65-year-old woman reporting burns to the neck due to an SF during a thyroidectomy was described. A literature review was performed using Pubmed and Scopus databases, focusing on epidemiology, causes, prevention activities associated with the SF, and the related best practices recommendations. The medico-legal analysis of the case led to admit the professional liability because the suggested time (3 min) to use the electrocautery after CHG application was not respected. The case analysis and the literature review suggest the importance of implementing National and Local procedures to promote the management of SF risk. Finally, it is necessary to highlight the role of incident reporting and root causes analysis in understanding the cause of the adverse events and thus enforce their prevention.

Strabismus surgical time-out: an illustrated whiteboard modification

BACKGROUND

Errors in strabismus surgery-including wrong eye, wrong muscle, and wrong procedure-can occur when there is confusion about the surgical plan among members of the surgical team, including surgeons, anesthesia staff, nurses, and technicians. The purpose of this study was to assess whether implementation of a strabismus-specific whiteboard combined with oral statement of the surgical plan using nonophthalmological terminology could improve communication among the team before commencement of surgery.

METHODS

A strabismus-specific whiteboard with labeled diagram of the eyes and extraocular muscles was designed. Patient identifiers, diagnosis, deviation, and procedure name were included. This whiteboard was completed preoperatively and referenced during time-out. The surgeons and operating room staff were trained in its use, and surveys were completed before and 6 months after implementation of the whiteboard time-out.

RESULTS

The pre-implementation survey was completed by 19 operating room staff members, of whom 15 completed the post-implementation survey. The strabismus specific whiteboard increased staff member understanding of procedure laterality (74% to 93%), muscle(s) to be operated (37% to 93%), and specific procedure(s) planned (37% to 87%). Surgeon surveys also showed increased confidence in staff member understanding of each parameter with whiteboard use.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized time-out combined with an illustrated strabismus surgery whiteboard improves communication between team members and has the potential to reduce surgical errors.

Gossypiboma-an unusual cause of surgical abdomen and surgeon's nightmare: A rare case report

INTRODUCTION

The term Gossypiboma is used to describe a retained surgical sponge in body after surgical procedure. It is an infrequent but serious surgical complication which is seldom reported because of the medicolegal implications. It can present within days as a surgical emergency or years after the operation.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of 30-year-old female who presented in emergency with acute pain abdomen and severe distention of abdomen. She had history of caesarean section 15 days ago at another hospital. On clinical examination and investigation, it appeared like a surgical abdomen. Contrast enhanced computed tomography suspected an intrabdominal Gossypiboma. On exploratory laparotomy there was a lump in left side of abdominal cavity. Retained surgical sponge was removed that confirmed the diagnosis of Gossypiboma.

DISCUSSION

Gossypiboma is a real, serious but preventable surgical complication. It affects the patient safety, cost of treatment and may cause mortality if there is delay in diagnosis and treatment. It is commonly seen in emergency and difficult surgeries. Its clinical presentation is extremely variable. It can cause acute surgical abdomen, that needs urgent surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Meticulous counts of surgical items with careful inspection of surgical site can lessen these complications. Radio frequency chip identification verification by barcode scanner can reduce the error rate.

Wrong-Site Surgery in Pennsylvania During 2015–2019: A Study of Variables Associated With 368 Events From 178 Facilities

Wrong-site surgery (WSS) is a well-known type of medical error that may cause a high degree of patient harm. In Pennsylvania, healthcare facilities are mandated to report WSS events, among other patient safety concerns, to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) database. In the study we identified instances of WSS events (not including near misses) that occurred during 2015–2019 and were reported to PA-PSRS. During the five-year period, we found that 178 healthcare facilities reported a total of 368 WSS events, which was an average of 1.42 WSS events per week in Pennsylvania. Also, we revealed that 76% (278 of 368) of the WSS events contributed to or resulted in temporary harm or permanent harm to the patient. Overall, the study shows that the frequency of WSS varied according to a range of variables, including error type (e.g., wrong side, wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong patient); year; facility type; hospital bed size; hospital procedure location; procedure; body region; body part; and clinician specialty. Our findings are aligned with some of the previous research on WSS; however, the current study also addresses many gaps in the literature. We encourage readers to use the visuals in the manuscript and appendices to gain new insight into the relation among the variables associated with WSS. Ultimately, the findings reported in the current study help to convey a more complete account of the variables associated with WSS, which can be used to assist staff in making informed decisions about allocating resources to mitigate risk.