COVID-19 Resulted in Reduction Trainee Bedside Experience, But No Reduction in Surgical Experience

Purpose

Because of the concerns regarding residency process during the pandemic, this study aimed to investigate the volume of clinical interactions of orthopaedic residents at a tertiary hospital by reporting the number of patients treated in the outpatient clinic, inpatient ward, and operating room.

Methods

This retrospective chart study evaluated variables such as volume of clinical interactions of orthopaedic residents at a tertiary hospital by reporting the number of patients treated in the outpatient clinic, inpatient ward, and operating room, from an orthopaedic department in a tertiary trauma center throughout the COVID-19 pandemic era. Comparing these measures was an indirect evaluation tool for measuring the amount of work completed and clinical exposure gained by the residents.

Results

Occupancy percentage, hospitalization days, admissions to the department, and attendance of the outpatient clinic were all decreased during the pandemic. No significant changes were evident in the total number of surgeries nor the number of elective surgeries during the pandemic.

Conclusions

Overall, a reduction in overall hospitalization days, admissions to the department, total number of visits in the outpatient clinic, and occupancy percentage of the ward was observed during COVID-19. However, there was no difference in the average number of monthly surgeries between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 timeframes.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative review.

Public Perceptions of General Surgery Residency Training

OBJECTIVE

Patients are integral to surgical training. Understanding our patients' perceptions of surgical training, resident involvement and autonomy is crucial to optimizing surgical education and thus patient care. In the modern, connected world many factors extrinsic to a patient's experience of healthcare may influence their opinion of our training systems (i.e., social media, television shows, and internet searches). The purpose of this article is to contextualize the literature investigating public perceptions of general surgery training to allow us to effect patient education initiatives to optimize both surgical training and patient safety.

DESIGN

This is a perspective including a literature review summarizing the current knowledge of public perceptions of general surgery training.

CONCLUSIONS

Little is published regarding patient and public perceptions of general surgery residency training and the role of residents within this. Current literature demonstrates that the majority of patients are willing to have residents participate in their care. Patients' attitude toward resident involvement in their operation is improved by utilizing educational materials and by ensuring a supervising attending is present within the operating room. These observations, coupled with future work to delve deeper into factors affecting public perceptions of surgical training and resident involvement within this, can guide strategies to improve surgical education.

Scoping Evidence Review on Training and Skills Assessment for Open Emergency Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Scope evidence on technical performance metrics for open emergency surgery. Identify surgical performance metrics and procedures used in trauma training courses.

DESIGN

Structured literature searches of electronic databases were conducted from January 2010 to December 2019 to identify systematic reviews of tools to measure surgical skills employed in vascular or trauma surgery evaluation and training.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Faculty of Shock Trauma Anesthesiology Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland and Implementation Science, King's College, London.

RESULTS

The evidence from 21 systematic reviews including over 54,000 subjects enrolled into over 840 eligible studies, identified that the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill was used for elective surgery not for emergency trauma and vascular control surgery procedures. The Individual Procedure Score (IPS), used to evaluate emergency trauma procedures performed before and after training, distinguished performance of residents from experts and practicing surgeons. IPS predicted surgeons who make critical errors and need remediation interventions. No metrics showed Kirkpatrick's Level 4 evidence of technical skills training benefit to emergency surgery outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert benchmarks, errors, complication rates, task completion time, task-specific checklists, global rating scales, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills, and IPS were found to identify surgeons, at all levels of seniority, who are in need of remediation of technical skills for open surgical hemorrhage control. Large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to evaluate any benefit of trauma technical skills training on patient outcomes.

Is Patient Advocacy the Solution to Physician Burnout?

Physician burnout has been on the rise over the last several decades in a variety of specialties, leading to high rates of physician suicide and poor health outcomes for patients. As leaders in healthcare attempt to combat this issue through mental health initiatives and changes in medical training policies, we propose patient advocacy as a powerful technique to combat physician burnout and restore autonomy, purpose, and meaning into physicians' lives.

The Role of Outpatient Care Accreditation in Enhancing Foreign Patients' Perception of Colombian Medical Tourism: A Quasi-experimental Design

This study analyzes whether hospitals accredited by the Joint Commission International in outpatient medical care protocols located in Colombia achieve a higher quality perception from foreign patients compared to others treated in a non-accredited one. A t-test with Welch correction, chi-square test, correlation coefficient of Tau Kendall, pre-test, post-test, complementary questionnaire and a 2 focus groups were used in 178 foreign patients. It was observed that patients treated in accredited hospitals had a higher quality perception than the non-accredited group. However, it was found that an unbalanced application of the 3 variables negatively alters quality judgment. Findings contributes to understanding the Colombian medical tourism in depth using non-conventional instruments.