Standard Restrictions vs Expedited Activity After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Postoperative Activity Restrictions After Slings: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IMPORTANCE

Restricting activity after midurethral slings is an unproven practice.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative activity restriction on satisfaction and outcomes after slings.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter, 2-arm, noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 18-85 years undergoing treatment with a midurethral sling were randomized 1:1 to postoperative activity restriction or liberal activity. Restrictions included avoidance of strenuous exercise and heavy lifting. The liberal group was allowed to resume activity at their discretion. Our primary outcome was satisfaction with postoperative instruction at 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes included surgical failure, mesh exposure rates, and other adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 158 patients were randomized with 80 to the liberal group and 78 to the restricted group. At 2 weeks, 54 (80.6%) of patients in the liberal group and 48 (73.9%) of patients in the restricted group were satisfied. We found statistical evidence supporting the hypothesis that postoperative liberal activity instruction is noninferior to activity restriction with regard to patient satisfaction (P = 0.0281). There was no significant difference in strenuous activity at 2 weeks (P = 0.0824). The liberal group reported significantly more moderate activity at 2 weeks (P = 0.0384) and more strenuous activity at 6 weeks and 6 months (P = 0.0171, P = 0.0118, respectively). The rate of recurrent or persistent stress incontinence for liberal versus restricted groups was 18.52% versus 23.53% (P = 0.635). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative liberal activity was noninferior to activity restriction with regard to patients' satisfaction. There was no evidence supporting a statistically significant association between postoperative instruction and negative surgical outcomes.

Measuring Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An Evolution

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Advances in our understanding of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have been made with the introduction of valid, reliable measures of anatomy and patient-reported outcome measures.

METHODS

This review provides an overview of the evolution of POP measurement and its implications for clinical practice and research.

RESULTS

Since the introduction of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ), studies have demonstrated that some degree of loss of anatomic support is normal, with as many as 40% of normal women having stage 2 prolapse. Vaginal support is dynamic and can wax and wane but is largely stable over time. Vaginal bulge symptoms are the most reliable and specific symptom for POP and the hymen is an important threshold for symptom development. Most pelvic floor symptoms have only weak to moderate correlation with the anatomic severity of POP. Treatment success rates are highly variable depending upon criteria used and definitions of anatomic success commonly used are too strict and often not clinically relevant. There is substantial discordance between subjective and anatomic measures of success, and both are dynamic, fluctuating between success and failure for many patients without intervening treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic organ prolapse is multidimensional, dynamic, and has a complex impact on patients. Patients' symptoms are more clinically relevant than anatomic support. Symptomatic cure, particularly the absence of vaginal bulge symptoms, is more clinically relevant than anatomic cure and composite outcomes can be misleading and overestimate failure rates. Future studies should compare treatments using continuous variables along multiple dimensions rather than using composite outcomes or dichotomizing patients into success or failure.

Activity Restrictions After Gynecologic Surgery

Gynecologic surgeons have traditionally restricted the physical activity of postoperative patients. Minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery programs have contributed to decreased hospital stays and more expeditious recovery. In this narrative review, we review the current state of postoperative activity restrictions in gynecology and other specialties, the purported risks and potential benefits of postoperative activity, the available evidence to refute or support activity in the postoperative activity, and, finally, the potential benefit of added activity in the postoperative period.