Intra-mesenteric artery steroid administration relieved severe refractory gastro-intestinal graft-vs.-host disease in an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation patient

Regional intra-arterial steroid treatment in 120 patients with steroid-resistant or -dependent GvHD

GvHD results in death in the majority of steroid-resistant patients. This report assesses the safety and efficacy of two regional intra-arterial steroid (IAS) treatment protocols in the largest published cohort of patients with resistant/dependent hepatic and/or gastrointestinal GvHD, as well as identification of predictors of response to IAS and survival. One hundred and twenty patients with hepatic, gastrointestinal GvHD or both were given IAS. Gastrointestinal initial response (IR) and complete response (CR) were documented in 67.9% and 47.6%, respectively, whereas hepatic IR/CR in 54.9% and 33.3%, respectively. The predictors of gastrointestinal CR were lower peak GvHD and steroid-dependent (SD) GvHD. The predictors for hepatic CR were male patient, reduced intensity conditioning and SD GvHD. Twenty-six of the 120 patients (21.6%) are currently alive (median follow-up for the survivors 91.5 months). The 12 months' overall survival is 30% with no treatment-associated deaths. Predictors of 12 months' survival were as follows: first transplant, age<20 years, non-TBI regimen and GvHD CR. Shorter time to gastrointestinal IR but not time to hepatic IR was associated with improved 12 months' survival. IAS appears to be safe and effective. Gastrointestinal treatment is more effective than hepatic treatment. In our study, we conclude our current recommendations for IAS treatment.

Intra-arterial methylprednisolone for severe steroid refractory gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a significant complication of bone marrow transplantation with approximately half of patients being refractory to steroids. There are numerous second-line systemic immunosuppressive treatments but the overall prognosis is poor and these therapies are associated with high mortality due to infection. An alternative approach to systemic treatment for GVHD is targeted delivery of immunosuppression. We present two pediatric cases with steroid-refractory gastrointestinal GVHD who clinically responded to intra-arterial steroid administration. We also review the literature regarding this treatment modality with a particular emphasis in children.

Intramesenteric steroid treatment for steroid- refractory gastrointestinal graft versus host disease

Currently, steroid-refractory severe gastrointestinal (GI) graft versus host disease (GVHD) is among the most important complications of allogeneic transplantation, and as yet there is no standard approach to its treatment. Herein we report two cases with steroid-refractory GI GVHD that received intramesenteric steroid treatment. In both cases the frequency and volume of diarrhea resolved completely following intramesenteric methylprednisolone (MP) injection. In conclusion, intra-arterial steroid injection might be an alternative treatment approach for steroid-refractory GI GVHD.

Conflict of interest:None declared.

Intra-arterial methylprednisolone infusion in treatment-resistant graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a potentially fatal complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Standard primary therapy for acute GVHD includes systemic steroids, often in combination with other agents. Unfortunately, primary treatment failure is common and carries a high mortality. There is no generally accepted secondary therapy for acute GVHD. Although few data on localized therapy for GVHD have been published, intra-arterial injection of high-dose corticosteroids may be a viable option. We treated 11 patients with steroid-resistant GVHD using a single administration of intra-arterial high-dose methylprednisolone. Three patients (27%) died periprocedurally. Four patients (36%) had a partial response to intra-arterial treatment and were discharged on total parenteral nutrition and oral medication. Four patients (36%) had a complete response and were discharged on oral diet and oral medication. No immediate treatment or procedure-related complications were noted. Twenty-seven percent of patients survived long-term. Our preliminary results suggest that regional intra-arterial treatment of steroid-resistant GVHD is a safe and potentially viable secondary therapy in primary treatment-resistant GVHD.

Role of intra-arterial steroid administration in the management of steroid-refractory acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

We report here a case of severe steroid-refractory gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease treated with intra-arterial administration of corticosteroids. A 53-year-old female with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplant from her HLA-matched sibling. She developed grade II skin and grade IV gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease with no hepatic involvement. Therapy with oral prednisone easily controlled her skin rash but she had profuse diarrhea that did not respond to high dose intravenous corticosteroids and denileukin diftitox. Infusion of methyl-prednisolone into superior and inferior mesenteric arteries produced dramatic improvement of diarrhea, with complete resolution of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease.

Pulse cyclophosphamide for corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease

Corticosteroid-resistant GVHD is difficult to manage and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Cyclophosphamide (Cy) is an established immunosuppressive and cytotoxic drug widely used as part of pretransplant conditioning regimens. In a retrospective study of 15 patients who had not responded to corticosteroids (nine with acute GVHD, three with GVHD after donor leukocyte infusion, and three progressive chronic GVHD), pulse Cy at a median dose of 1 g/m(2) was very effective in the treatment of skin (100% response), liver (70% response), and the oral cavity (100% response). Severe intestinal GVHD responded poorly. The toxicity profile was acceptable, with manageable, short-term myelosuppression in some patients. The risk of opportunistic infections, mixed chimerism, relapses, or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was not increased. Overall survival was 57%, with median and maximum follow-up of 9 and 37 months, respectively. The cost of the drug was negligible, especially when compared to monoclonal antibodies. Pulse Cy requires further investigation in corticosteroid-resistant GVHD.

Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease

Corticosteroid-resistant graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is difficult to manage and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as the salvage therapy for steroid-refractory GvHD. Twenty one patients (10 with acute GvHD and 11 with chronic GvHD) were studied retrospectively. Steroid-resistant GvHD was defined as acute or chronic GvHD not responding to a first-line regimen of cyclosporine A and corticosteroids in a dose equivalent to 2 mg/kg methylprednisolone for at least 7 days. MMF was added at a dose of 2 g daily, and corticosteroids were tapered. Thirteen (62%) of 21 patients responded to the treatment with MMF, including 6 (60%) of 10 patients with acute refractory GvHD and 7 (64%) of 11 patients with chronic refractory GvHD. The most common adverse effects were infectious complications (67%, 14 of 21 patients) and hematological toxicity (29%, 6 of 21 patients). Median duration of MMF administration was 6 months (range 1-27 months). Sixteen of 21 patients were alive after the median follow-up of 27 months (range 1-72 months) after the initiation of MMF therapy. All 16 surviving patients were in good clinical condition and in remission of their hematological malignancy. Five patients died--two of relapses of leukemia and three of refractory intestinal GvHD. These results suggest that MMF can be an effective treatment for some cases of steroid-refractory GvHD.

Intra-arterial steroid-injection therapy for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease with the evaluation of angiography

We treated three patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) with intra-arterial steroid-injection therapy (IAST). Two patients with gut aGVHD received IAST into both superior and inferior mesenteric arteries, while one patient with liver aGVHD received IAST into the proper hepatic artery. The volume of stools and the bilirubin level improved soon after IAST. Angiography of the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries was performed in the two patients with steroid-refractory gut aGVHD, and identical abnormal findings were obtained. IAST might be an earlier option for steroid-refractory aGVHD.

Intrahepatic arterial administration of low-dose methotrexate in patients with severe hepatic graft-versus-host disease: An open-label, uncontrolled trial

BACKGROUND

Hepatic grafr-versus-host disease (GVHD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Standard therapy includes systemically administered immunosuppressive drugs. More recent reports have described catheter-directed intrahepatic arterial (IHA) delivery of low-dose methotrexate (MTX) and methylprednisolone in the treatment of corticosteroid-resistant severe hepatic GVHD.

OBJECTIVE

This article reports on MTX toxicity and the variability in plasma drug concentrations after IHA administration of low-dose MTX in patients with severe hepatic GVHD.

METHODS

In this open-label, uncontrolled pilot study, MTX and methylprednisolone were administered via the hepatic artery in patients with corticosteroid-resistant grade III or IV GVHD of the liver. Patients also received standard therapy. MTX concentrations were measured in the hepatic artery 5 and 10 minutes after injection and in peripheral venous blood at 1, 2, and 24 hours.

RESULTS

Six patients (5 males [83.3%], I female [16.7%]; median age, 32 years; range, 8-42 years) were enrolled in the study. No hepatotoxicity was observed after IHA administration of MTX. In 5 patients with normal renal function, plasma drug concentrations 24 hours after administration of MTX ranged from 0.01 to 0.12 micromol/L (mean [SD], 0.043 [0.042] micromol/L). In 1 patient with renal failure, plasma MTX concentrations were 1.0 micromol/L 24 hours after administration and 0.07 micromol/L 5 days after administration. The severe hematologic and renal toxicity observed in this patient may have contributed to his death. Adverse events in patients with GVHD and normal renal function, who had normal plasma MTX concentrations, were comparable to those that have been reported after administration of an intravenous infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with GVHD and normal renal function, IHA administration of low-dose MTX was not associated with liver or bone marrow toxicity. Further study is needed to determine the optimal protocols for treating corticosteroid-resistant hepatic GVHD.

Intra-arterial catheter directed therapy for severe graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), resulting in death in the majority of steroid-resistant patients. We assessed the efficacy of regional intra-arterial treatment in patients with resistant hepatic and/or gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD. In total, 15 patients with steroid resistant grade 3-4 hepatic (n = 4), gastrointestinal (GI) (n = 8) GVHD or both (n = 3) were given intra-arterial treatment. Patients with hepatic GVHD received methotrexate and methylprednisolone into the hepatic artery. Patients with GI GVHD were treated with infusions of methylprednisolone into the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries. Two patients with pronounced upper GI symptoms also received upper GI treatment. In total, 25 procedures were carried out (range 1-3 per patient). Hepatic response was observed in four out of seven (57%) patients with hepatic GVHD, three (43%) featuring good response. Complete responses were observed in nine (82%) GI GVHD patients, with median time to initial and complete response of 3 d (range 1-7) and 15.8 d (range 4-33) respectively. Regional treatment of severe GVHD with intra-arterial treatment appears to be effective and safe. GI treatment maybe more effective than intrahepatic treatment. Early administration of isolated intra-arterial therapy in high-risk patients may further improve the outcome and reduce untoward effects of systemic immunosuppressive treatment.