The HIV-2 genotype and the HIV-1 syncytium-inducing phenotype are associated with a lower virus replication in dendritic cells

Metabolic activation of nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in dendritic and Langerhans cells

BACKGROUND

Langerhans cells and interstitial dendritic cells are the earliest targets for HIV infection through sexual transmission of HIV. Metabolism of nucleoside analogues markedly differs in proliferating T lymphocytes and resting monocyte/macrophages, and thus their antiviral efficacy can substantially differ between both cell types.

METHODS

The metabolism of radio-labelled zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir (PMPA) to their antivirally active metabolites was studied in primary cells, representative of early in vivo targets of HIV [i.e. monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MO-DC), MO-derived Langerhans cells (MO-LC), PHA/IL-2-activated T-blast cells] as well as in a laboratory T-lymphocyte (CEM) cell line.

RESULTS

Whereas lamivudine metabolism to its active triphosphate derivative (3TC-TP) did not markedly differ between T-cells and MO-derived LC and DC, zidovudine was much better converted to ZDV-TP in T-cells than in MO-LC and MO-DC. In contrast, tenofovir was markedly more abundantly converted to its antivirally active diphosphate metabolite PMPApp in MO-DC and MO-LC than zidovudine and lamivudine.

CONCLUSION

Our metabolic data suggest that tenofovir may be superior to zidovudine and lamivudine for inhibition of HIV replication in dendritic/Langerhans cells, the first-line cell types targeted by a primary HIV infection.

Activity of reverse transcriptase inhibitors in monocyte-derived dendritic cells: a possible in vitro model for postexposure prophylaxis of sexual HIV transmission

Because prevention of heterosexual HIV transmission is not always possible, it is important to develop effective strategies of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Since in vivo comparison of drug potency is difficult, we developed an in vitro model with cells resembling primary targets during sexual transmission: monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MO-DCs), Langerhans cells (MO-LCs), and resting autologous CD4(+) T cells. Nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs and NNRTIs, respectively) were evaluated for their antiviral activity, when added immediately after infection or at a later time point. In parallel, their immune-suppressive effect was examined by measuring inhibition of mixed MO-DC/allogeneic CD4(+) T cell cultures. Most RTIs potently inhibited HIV replication, even if added 24 hr after infection (representing PEP). The sensitivity to antiretroviral drugs was similar in HIV-infected MO-DCs and MO-LCs, but decreased in cocultures with resting autologous CD4(+) T cells. The NNRTIs efavirenz and UC-781 as well as the NRTIs AZT, 3TC, and d4T showed a similar high potency in MO-DC plus autologous CD4(+) T cell cocultures as compared with CEM T cells, whereas their activity in phytohemagglutinin/interleukin 2 (PHA/IL-2)-activated CD4(+) T cells was lower. The dideoxynucleoside RTI abacavir as well as the phosphonates (R)-PMPA and PMEA were more active in infected MO-DCs as compared with either CEM T cells or PHA/IL-2 activated CD4(+) T cells. Infection in cocultures of MO-DCs and autologous CD4(+) T cells could be aborted in a proportion of the cultures, with high concentrations of PMEA and/or efavirenz, but not with AZT. Suppressive activity in mixed leukocyte cultures was observed only at very high concentrations of RTI. Our data suggest that cocultures of MO-DCs and autologous CD4(+) T cells can be used as a possible in vitro model to explore protocols for PEP after sexual HIV transmission.

Modeling HIV transfer between dendritic cells and T cells: importance of HIV phenotype, dendritic cell-T cell contact and T-cell activation

OBJECTIVE

To study the requirements for HIV transfer between dendritic cells (DC) and CD4 T cells, using an in vitro model, combined with flow cytometry.

METHODS

Immature DC and macrophages (MA) were generated from monocytes. After infection, DC or MA were cultured alone or with purified CD4 T cells. Intracellular HIV was measured, using (1) the monocyte (MO)-tropic AD8 HIV, endowed with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP); and (2) intracellular staining of laboratory HIV strains and clones from primary isolates.

RESULTS

(1) Clone AD8-EGFP infected DC and MA with equal efficiency, but the virus was preferentially transferred from DC to autologous T cells. (2) DC were more productively infected with R5/NSI, as compared to X4/SI, HIV, but both HIV phenotypes were easily transmitted to autologous T4 cells. (3) HIV-infected DC transferred the virus to T cells across a semi-permeable membrane, if the T cells were in contact with non-infected DC. (4) Co-culture of T cells with autologous non-infected DC induced T-cell activation. HIV-infected DC selectively increased HLA-DR on T cells and HLA-DR (+) T cells were preferential targets for HIV transfer. (5) Resting Ba-L-infected CD4 T cells were able to transmit the virus 'inversely' to co-cultured DC.

CONCLUSION

HIV transfer between monocyte-derived dendritic cells and autologous CD4 T cells was directly demonstrated using flow cytometry. The transfer proceeded in both directions, depended on cellular contact and was associated with partial T-cell activation. This model, representing relevant in vivo targets of HIV, is useful to further investigate interactions between HIV, DC and T cells, without the need for primary ex vivo DC.