Phase II trials of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic gastric or pancreatic carcinoma

Currently available first-line drug therapies for treating pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the 9th most common cancer in the United States and the 4th most common cause of cancer-related death given its poor prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

The authors have performed a literature search for pertinent published clinical trials, ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials, and current treatment guidelines using PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, and NCCN, ASCO, ESMO, and JPS websites. The review itself discusses landmark studies and ongoing research into the chemotherapy regimens recommended by each oncologic society. The authors also examine drugs that were promising but failed in Phase 3 trials and those currently being investigated. Finally, the authors provide their expert opinion on the subject and provide their future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

While advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer have been limited in comparison to other cancers, there have been improvements in survival. Combination therapy and a goal of R0 resection are key elements to extend life. Novel agents directed at the unique properties of pancreatic cancer are promising.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a first-line phase II study

OBJECTIVE

Current chemotherapy protocols for gastric cancer present high toxicity. The FOLFIRI regimen has shown promising results with elderly colorectal cancer patients and for gastric cancer patients but this is the first report on elderly gastric cancer patients.

DESIGN

In this multicenter non-randomized phase II trial, we administered the FOLFIRI chemotherapy protocol (irinotecan [180 mg/m(2)], fluorouracil [5-FU] [400 mg/m(2)] and folinic acid 400 mg/m(2) or 200mg/m(2) of l-folinic acid) to patients aged over 70 years with locally-advanced or metastatic gastric cancer combined with Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Responses were assessed at 2 months.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients received eight cycles of the FOLFIRI regimen, with 82.5% of patients showing disease control: 10 patients (26%) showing objective (partial or complete) responses and 23 (57.5%) showing stable disease. One-year overall survival (OS) was 41.5% [95%CI 26.5-56.0] and one-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 31.8% [95%CI 18.4-46.1%]. We observed 10 Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities with one febrile neutropenia. CGA data demonstrated that geriatric functions were not altered by treatment and that nutritional status improved over treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show excellent disease control and relatively high survival rates with limited toxicity similar to younger patients indicating that this regimen should be considered as a possible treatment in advanced gastric cancer of the elderly.

Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the role of radiation therapy

Pancreatic cancer remains associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Surgical resection can be curative, but the majority of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Treatment for patients with locally advanced disease is controversial. Therapeutic options include systemic therapy alone, concurrent chemoradiation, or induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation. We review the evidence to date regarding the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), as well as evolving strategies including the emerging role of targeted therapies. We propose that if radiation is used for patients with LAPC, it should be delivered with concurrent chemotherapy and following a period of induction chemotherapy.

Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: a pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials

Whether elderly patients with metastatic esophageal, gastroesophageal, and gastric cancer do as well with chemotherapy as their younger counterparts was investigated in this pooled analysis. In total, 367 patients from 8 consecutive, first-line trials were included: i) etoposide + cisplatin; ii) 5-fluorourucil + leucovorin; iii) 5-fluorouracil + levamisole; iv) irinotecan; v) docetaxel + irinotecan; vi) oxaliplatin + capecitabine; vii) docetaxel + capecitabine; and viii) bortezomib + paclitaxel + carboplatin. One hundred and fifty-four (42%) patients were > or =65 years old (range: 65-86), and 213 younger (range: 20-64). Elderly patients had worse performance scores (2-3): 19 vs. 8% (p<0.0001). Rates of grade 3+ adverse events across all chemotherapy cycles in univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted for gender, performance score, and stratified by individual study) were higher among elderly patients. Rates of neutropenia, fatigue, infection, and stomatitis in elderly vs. younger patients were 31 vs. 29% (p=0.02 by multivariate analyses); 15 vs. 5% (p=0.01); 9 vs. 4% (p=0.03); 6 vs. 1% (p=0.04). In contrast, duration of chemotherapy, overall survival, and progression-free survival were comparable. Although age should not preclude trial entry, these adverse event rates suggest a need to develop more tolerable regimens for older patients with these malignancies.

Phase I trial of oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, folinic acid and concurrent radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

This dose escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses (RDs) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with concomitant radiotherapy in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. Patients received three courses of LV5FU2 regimen (folinic acid 200 mg m⁻², bolus 5FU 300–400 mg/m², continuous infusion 5FU 400–600 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 2) and escalating doses of oxaliplatin 50 to 100 mg m⁻² on day 1 (FOLFOX). This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks, concomitant to a 50-gray radiotherapy per 5 weeks. Three more cycles were delivered after completion of radiation therapy. Three to six patients were allocated to each of the five dose levels until MTD was reached. Thirty-three patients were enroled and 21 had metastatic disease. Maximum tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 100 mg m⁻², and continuous infusion 5FU was 600 mg m⁻² day⁻ (level 5). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, dysphagia and oesophagitis. The RDs were those of FOLFOX-4 regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg m⁻² and full doses of LV5FU2). The overall response was 48.5%, including 12% complete response. Response rate on primary tumour was 62.9%. This FOLFOX-4 regimen was reasonably well tolerated and effective in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal carcinoma and warrants additional investigation.

Molecular mechanisms of head and neck cancer

Despite advances in understanding the underlying genetics, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) remains a major health risk and one of the leading causes of mortality in the world. Current standards of treatment have significantly improved long-term survival rates of patients, but second tumors and metastases still remain the most frequent cause of high mortality in SCCHN patients. A better understanding of the underlying genetic mechanisms of SCCHN tumorigenesis will help in developing better diagnostics and, hence, better cures. In this article we will briefly outline the current state of diagnostics and treatment and our understanding of the molecular causes of SCCHN.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-fluouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Fifty-five eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC (median age 62 and 90% of patients presented with metastasis) received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) intravenous infusion for 2 h, followed by intravenous infusion of 5-FU (3000 mg/m2) and leucovorin (100 mg/m2) for 46 h every 14 days until the patient's disease was either in progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient's withdrawal or the investigators' decision to discontinue treatment. Of the 55 enrolled patients, 48 were evaluable for response. Three patients (5.4%) showed complete remission and 20 patients (36.4%) achieved partial response. The overall response rate was 47.9%. Nineteen patients (34.5%) had stable disease and six patients (10.9%) showed progressive disease. The median time to progression was 5.6 months and the median overall survival was 10.8 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (12.7%), thrombocytopenia (5.4%), diarrhoea (3.6%) and vomiting (9.1%). Peripheral neuropathy was noted in 61.8% of the patients (grade 1/2: 54.5%; grade 3: 7.3%). Our study confirmed that the combination of oxaliplatin and continuous infusion of 5-FU/leucoverin without bolus 5-FU as first-line chemotherapy is active for patients with AGC and relatively safe with lower haematological toxicity.

Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: from metastatic disease to adjuvant therapy

Pancreatic cancer remains a significant therapeutic challenge in oncology as the 21st century begins. Currently available cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents provide only a modest survival benefit for patients with advanced disease. Recent efforts to improve survival in the setting of locally advanced and metastatic disease have focused on combinations of cytotoxic agents and the integration of newer molecular agents. To date, these strategies have been somewhat disappointing, prompting some experts to consider changes in clinical trial design with more rigorous patient eligibility criteria. In the adjuvant therapy setting, investigation of newer agents has lagged behind studies in more advanced disease, but recent results suggested some evidence of incremental advance. However, just as in advanced pancreatic cancer, without a more disciplined approach to patient selection for surgical intervention and subsequent adjuvant therapy, progress can be expected to remain very slow. This review will provide a brief summary of the history of chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and focus on its current and future role in adjuvant therapy.

Phase II multicenter trial of docetaxel, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (DEF) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a novel, safe, and active regimen

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [DEF] as treatment for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients participated in the study (median age, 56 years; range, 22-73 years); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [PS], 0-2). Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV (day 1), 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV (days 1-3), and epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV (day 1) were administered every 3 weeks for six cycles.

RESULTS

In total, 20/37 patients (54%) completed six treatment cycles. Thirteen patients (35%; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 20% to 51%) had an objective response; 1 patient (3%) achieved a complete response and 12 patients (32%) achieved partial responses. Stable disease was observed in 7 patients (19%) and progressive disease in 5 patients (14%). Twelve patients (32%) were unevaluable. Clinical benefit (based on PS, weight gain, and analgesic consumption) was observed in 11 patients (30%). Median follow-up was 41 months (range, 26-53 months), median time to progression was 6.6 months (range, 0.5-29.2 months), median overall survival was 10.7 months (range, 7.0-14.6 months), and 1-year survival was 40%. The regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 8 patients (22%; 6% of cycles) and grade 3-4 neutropenia in 1 patient (1% of cycles). The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were alopecia (11% of cycles), diarrhea (4% of cycles) and vomiting (2% of cycles); grade 1-2 asthenia and fatigue occurred in 43% of cycles.

CONCLUSION

DEF is effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, and has a good safety profile.

Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: Past, present, and future

Advanced pancreatic cancer is a devastating illness characterized by significant morbidity and a brief median survival. Although standard chemotherapy with gemcitabine achieves only modest improvements in survival and quality of life, classic cytotoxic agents, such as 5-fluorouracil, pemetrexed, irinotecan, exatecan, cisplatin, or oxaliplatin, given alone or in combination with gemcitabine, have not proved superior. Thus, more recent trials have focused on targeting the biologic characteristics of pancreatic cancer. Although phase III trials of farnesyl transferase and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors have not improved survival, encouraging preliminary results have been observed in phase II studies of inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor and the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Gemcitabine combined with docetaxel for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with unresectable stage III, IVA, and IVB pancreatic carcinoma were eligible for this study. The first 18 patients received gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1, 8, and 15 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, repeated every 28 days. Due to a high incidence of myelosuppression in this first group, the treatment schedule was modified in the remaining patients to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 i.v. and docetaxel 40 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule. The primary study endpoints were objective response rate and duration of survival.

RESULTS

Ten of 33 evaluable patients achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 30.3% (95% CI, 16.21%-48.87%). Partial responses noted in the pancreas and a variety of metastatic sites were maintained for 4 to 12 months (median 6 months). Twelve additional patients (36%) experienced stable disease. The median time to progression was 6 months, and median survival was 10.5 months. The toxicity profile of the modified gemcitabine/docetaxel schedule was more favorable than that associated with the initial regimen, particularly with respect to hematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The response and survival data reported here for combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel are encouraging given the poor prognosis associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer. These data suggest that gemcitabine plus docetaxel may be more effective than either agent alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and warrants further study.

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of a biweekly regimen of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (FU) alone or in combination with cisplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and to select the best arm for a phase III study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-six patients (two were ineligible) were enrolled onto the randomized multicenter phase II trial. Patients received LV 200 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) followed by FU 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and FU 600 mg/m(2) (22-hour continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2 every 14 days (LV5FU2; arm A), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) (1-hour infusion) on day 1 or 2 (arm B), or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion) on day 1 (arm C).

RESULTS

The overall response rates, which were confirmed by an independent expert panel, were 13% (95% CI, 3.4% to 23.3%), 27% (95% CI, 14.1% to 40.4%), and 40% (95% CI, 25.7% to 54.3%) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 11.1 months) with LV5FU2, respectively; 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.3 months) and 9.5 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.2 months) with LV5FU2-cisplatin, respectively; and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) and 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 13.3 months) with LV5FU2-irinotecan, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Of the three regimens tested, the combination of LV5FU2-irinotecan is the most promising and will be assessed in a phase III trial.

Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II study of the EORTC GastroIntestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

The aim of the study was to assess the response rate and toxicity of high-dose 24 h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Patients with measurable disease, performance status 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy were registered to receive cycles of leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 (or l-LV 250 mg/m2 over 1 h followed by 5FU 2.6 g/m2 over 24 h, weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The main endpoints were the response rate and toxicity. From 37 patients, 36 were the analysed for toxicity, and 33 were eligible and analysed for response. The median age was 59 years (range 28-74 years), and the median performance status was 1. Partial response was observed in three patients (9%) (95% Confidential Interval (CI): [2-24]%). Main grade 3/4 National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria toxicities (patients) were diarrhoea (n = 3), vomiting (n = 2) and hand-foot syndrome (n = 5). Median time to progression was 7 weeks (95% CI: [6.4-11.7] weeks) and median survival 19 weeks (95% CI: [12-35] weeks). In conclusion, high-dose 5FU and folinic acid is well tolerated, but has only modest activity in pancreatic cancer.

Status of treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Advanced gastric cancer is incurable. The most widely investigated single-agent chemotherapy is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with partial response rates up to 20%. Pilot phase II studies investigating combinations of 5-FU, anthracyclines, mitomycin, methotrexate, and platinums achieved higher response rates; however, the response rates declined in subsequent larger trials. Furthermore, toxicity was substantially higher in confirmatory trials, emphasizing the need to develop well-tolerated regimens prior to multi-institutional testing. Although phase III studies of combination regimens have not achieved a clear worldwide standard, the regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion 5-FU achieved a survival benefit, possibly through the increased activity of infusional 5-FU combined with cisplatin. The taxanes, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, have recently shown important activity in gastric cancer. Patient accrual to a phase III trial comparing a docetaxel-based combination regimen with the regimen of cisplatin and 5-FU has completed accrual. Whether patients with adenocarcinomas of the proximal stomach and gastroesophageal junction will have the same response rates to these new agents as did patients with classical body and distal gastric cancers is unknown. It is anticipated that the development of these active new agents will ultimately improve survival for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) (10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days.

RESULTS

Patients (69% male, 31% female) had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease, and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver (61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression, and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients (oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen in this indication.

Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale

BACKGROUND

A prospective, randomized Phase III trial was performed to determine whether, compared with gemcitabine (GEM) alone, the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to GEM was able to improve the time to disease progression and the clinical benefit rate in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate, overall survival rate, and toxicity patterns of patients in the two treatment arms were evaluated as secondary end points.

METHODS

Patients with measurable, locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive GEM (Arm A) or a combination of GEM and CDDP (Arm B). In Arm A, a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) GEM per week was administered for 7 consecutive weeks, and, after a 2-week rest, treatment was resumed on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 2 cycles. In Arm B, CDDP was given at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) per week 1 hour before GEM at the same dose that was used in Arm A. On Day 22, only GEM was administered. Patients were restaged after the first 7 weeks of therapy and then again after the other 2 cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients entered the trial: Fifty-four patients were randomized to Arm A, and 53 patients were randomized to Arm B. The median time to disease progression was 8 weeks in Arm A and 20 weeks in Arm B; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.048). In Arm A, one complete response and four partial responses were recorded on the basis of an intent-to-treat analysis, with an overall response rate of 9.2% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3-20%). In Arm B, there were no complete responses, whereas 14 partial responses were achieved, with an overall response rate of 26.4% (95%CI, 15-40%). This difference in the overall response rates was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The tumor growth control rate (i.e., total number of patients who achieved complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease) was 42.6% (95%CI, 29-57%) in Arm A and 56.6% (95%CI, 42-70%) in Arm B. A clinical benefit was observed in 21 of 43 patients (49%) in Arm A and in 20 of 38 patients (52.6%) in Arm B without any significant difference. The median overall survival was 20 weeks for patients in Arm A and 30 weeks for patients in Arm B (P = 0.43). Toxicity was mild in both treatment arms, with no significant differences between the two groups except for the statistically higher incidence of Grade 1-2 asthenia in Arm B (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of CDDP to GEM significantly improved the median time to disease progression and the overall response rate compared with GEM alone. The clinical benefit rate was similar in both arms, whereas the median overall survival rate was more favorable for Arm B, although the difference did not attain statistical significance. The authors conclude that the combination of CDDP and GEM currently may be considered as an optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase I study

BACKGROUND

The study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pancreatic ACA patients, with previously untreated advanced or metastatic disease, were enrolled in a dose escalation study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and gemcitabine intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. Doses of both drugs were increased with sequential cohorts of patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients were enrolled to three dose levels. DLT of neutropenia and a severe infection was noted at a dose of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity and nausea and vomiting were the most common grade 3/4 toxicities. The MTD, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, was well tolerated. Three confirmed responses were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ACA was determined. A phase II study of this combination is ongoing and will be reported separately at a later date.

The role of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Patients with pancreatic cancer have a very poor outlook. There have been major advances in the standard surgical treatment of this disease, resulting in decreased post-operative mortality and morbidity. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been developed to increase long-term patient survival following potentially curative resection. The standard chemotherapeutic agent is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), although newer cytotoxic agents are in clinical trials for advanced cancer. Initial studies of adjuvant therapy have been based on small numbers of patients, but recently two large European randomised controlled trials of adjuvant therapy (EORTC and ESPAC-1) have been completed. These suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant survival advantage over resection alone but chemoradiotherapy does not. Promising new agents are being developed and tested mainly in clinical trials of advanced pancreatic cancer. The results of large-scale randomised controlled trials to assess adjuvant therapies for pancreatic cancer demonstrate the great surgical and oncological progress that has been made over the past decade.

Treatment of non-resectable pancreatic cancer with intraperitoneal 5-FU and leucovorin IV

AIM

To explore the feasibility of intraperitoneal (IP) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and (IV) leucovorin for patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Thirty patients (11 men), median age 65 (range 36-74 years), with a non-resectable pancreatic carcinoma in stage III (n=2) and IV (n=28) were treated with IP 5-FU 750-1000 mg/m(2)and leucovorin IV 100 mg/m(2)for 2 days every 3rd week. Tumour effect was analysed with repeated computed tomography (CT) scans, performance status was estimated with Karnofsky's index (KI) and morphine consumption, and toxicity assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

RESULTS

Median survival time was 7 months (range 0-21). There was no difference in survival between patients with different grading, staging or tumour size. Regional and systemic toxicity: The treatment was well tolerated, with no grade III or IV complications or side-effects. The median KI showed a minor reduction during treatment. The median morphine consumption per 24 hours increased from 0 mg (range 0-250) at inclusion, to 70 mg (range 0-540) at exclusion. The median nadir (WBC) was 7.2x10(3)/mm(3)(range 5.2-18.8). All patients had abdominal discomfort and distension during IP installation.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU is feasible for patients with nonresectable pancreatic carcinoma. The treatment can induce a temporary stabilization of tumour growth and eventually prolong survival without adverse effects.

Treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a comprehensive review

The current standard therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the single-agent gemcitabine, by the increasingly used fixed rate infusion of 10 mg/m2/min. There is strong reason to anticipate that additional benefits will accrue with gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy. Gemcitabine and CPT-11 are synergistic with many drugs and non-cross-resistant with each other. Rigorous clinical investigations will be performed in an effort to identify optimal drug sequence and schedules for these novel combinations.

Gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil for nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Gemcitabine has been shown to be an active agent in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This study was conducted to prospectively examine the tolerance and early efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Twenty-three patients, median age 64 years, were treated with combined modality therapy. Nine patients underwent tumor resection before chemoradiation; 14 patients with locally unresectable tumors received definitive chemoradiation. Radiotherapy utilized four fields to the tumor and lymphatics to 45 Gy, plus a lateral boost to 50.4 Gy. Concurrent 5-FU 500 mg/m(2)/day was administered on days 1-3 and 29-31, followed by 4 months of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2)/week for 3 weeks (fourth week break). Adjuvant gemcitabine was well tolerated. Eighty-three percent of the patients completed three to four cycles. The primary dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia, which was observed in 10 patients (43%). Nonhematologic toxicities were reported in five patients (22%). There were no cases of gemcitabine-induced radiation recall and there have been no deaths attributed to treatment toxicity. Median follow-up for the 23 patients was 12 months (range, 5-50); the actuarial median survival was 13 months. This report confirms that adjuvant gemcitabine following radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be safely administered.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine and UFT modulated by leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The ONCOPAZ Cooperative Group

BACKGROUND

Use of chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC) pursues a palliative objective. Gemcitabine is active against this tumor and shows in vitro synergism with 5-fluorouracil. UFT is a combination of tegafur (a prodrug of 5-flouorouracil) and uracil that can be given orally. The administration of UFT for several weeks may simulate the effects of a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil. The objective of the current study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination gemcitabine-UFT-leucovorin in the treatment of APC.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with bidimensionally measurable APC were included. The study regimen consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week rest, intravenous 6S-steroisomer of leucovorin (6SLV) 250 mg/m(2) in 2 hours on Day 1, oral 6SLV 7.5 mg/12 hours on Days 2-14, and oral UFT 390 mg/m(2)/day (in 2 doses) on Days 1-14. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks for a minimum of 3 per patient unless progressive disease was detected.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three courses were given, with a median of 4 per patient. World Health Organization Grade 3-4 toxicity was: diarrhea in 7 patients (17%), leucopenia in 2 (5%), nausea/vomiting in 2 (5%), and anemia in 1 (4%). Among 38 patients evaluable for response, 6 achieved a partial response (16%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6-31. 4), 15 had stable disease (39%), and 17 had progression (45%). Improvement in performance status and symptoms (pain, analgesic consumption, and weight) was present in 11 (29%) and 17 (45%) patients, respectively. Eighteen patients (47%; 95% CI, 31.5-54.5) experienced a clinical benefit response.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine-UFT-6SLV is convenient and moderately active and shows a low toxicity for the palliative treatment of patients with APC.

Phase II evaluation of continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, mitomycin-C, and oral dipyridamole in advanced measurable pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial

At present there remains a need for more effective systemic therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Some studies have suggested that infusional chemotherapy schedules and biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve the therapeutic outcome in advanced colon cancer. One such regimen that uses continuous infusion 5-FU, weekly leucovorin, daily dipyridamole, and intermittent mitomycin-C has activity in both colon and unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. The intent of this trial was to test the effectiveness of this four-drug regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients received 5-FU 200 mg/m2 daily by continuous infusion, leucovorin 30 mg/m2 IV weekly, mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 day 1, and dipyridamole 75 mg orally four times daily for 5 weeks. After a 1-week break, treatment cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. Eligibility included biopsy-proven advanced measurable pancreatic cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 and 2, and no prior systemic chemotherapy. Of 46 evaluable patients, 9 partial responses and 1 complete tumor response were seen, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval 11-36%). The median survival in the group of 50 patients registered to this trial was 4.6 months, with a range of 0.33 to 40.2 months. Toxicity was manageable, with the most common toxicities (> or =grade III National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) being anorexia (13%), stomatitis (17%), and hand-foot syndrome (13%). Of note, little severe hematologic toxicity and no significant headaches were reported. Although some patients did respond, the therapeutic results are not encouraging enough to take this regimen to phase III testing.

Current approaches and future strategies for pancreatic carcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease characterized by local invasion and early dissemination. It is resistant to conventional surgical, radiotherapeutic, and chemotherapeutic modalities. These interventions have had minimal impact on overall survival with very few patients enjoying long term survival. Over the past few years, 2'difluoro-2'deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) has demonstrated modest activity in this disease and investigations are proceeding to expand its role in combination with radiotherapy and other chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, the identification of the molecular defects underlying this disease has suggested molecular targets for the design of rational systemic therapy. These targets include matrix metalloproteinases, K-ras, HER2/neu, p53, and the epidermal growth factor receptor. Current and future clinical trials designed to improve the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer will be discussed.

Current status of and future prospects for the medical management of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas

Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas is one of the most refractory neoplasms to medical treatment. Although of marginal value, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone or in combination with other agents or modalities has been the standard surgical adjuvant approach to localized unresectable tumor as well as the standard treatment for disseminated pancreatic cancer. Recently, a new chemotherapeutic agent, gemcitabine, has been shown to be somewhat more effective than 5-FU against metastatic pancreatic cancer. Treatment with gemcitabine usually results in a greater likelihood of objective response and better symptom control than treatment with 5-FU or drug combinations that include 5-FU. However, treatment with gemcitabine does not improve overall survival of patients with disseminated neoplasm. Newer promising agents such as 9-nitrocamptothecin have recently entered clinical trials, and novel modalities (e.g., gene therapy) are nearing full-scale clinical trial. There are reasons to believe that these and other new initiatives may soon significantly improve the medical management of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas.

Gemcitabine combined with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil in advanced and symptomatic pancreatic cancer: a clinical benefit-oriented phase II study

Gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil are the only two compounds with reproducible activity against advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). We have evaluated a novel combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil on the clinical benefit response (CBR) end point. Eleven consecutive patients with symptomatic APC were entered in a two-stage phase II trial. Gemcitabine was administered by intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection at the dose of 1,000 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8, 15 and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2) was given by continuous i.v. infusion on days 1-5. Treatment was repeated every 28 days. A CBR was achieved in 7/11 patients. The mean time to loss of CBR was 26.5 weeks (range 14-18, median 22). Toxicity was mild and no APC patient experienced WHO grade 3 toxicity. The gemcitabine/5-fluorouracil combination is well tolerated and produces a symptomatic relief in the majority of APC patients.

A phase II study: docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to further characterise the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel. 43 patients were enrolled into this phase II study. Treatment consisted of a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks without premedication with corticosteroids until progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Dose modifications were planned for adverse events. Patients were observed for 1 month after the last docetaxel infusion, to document any late adverse events, with a follow-up every 3 months until death. Response rate and duration were the major efficacy endpoints. Response status was reviewed by an external independent panel. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first treatment cycle. 40 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for safety. After independent review, partial response was recorded in 6 patients (overall response rate, 15%; 95% confidence limit (CI), 7.7-29.8%) and stable disease was recorded in 15 patients (38%). The median duration of response was 5.1 months (range: 3.1-7.2). The median pain control time was 4.5 months (range: 0-8) and the median time to performance status worsening was 2.3 months (range: 0-4.5). Most patients 40 (93.0%) received a relative dose intensity of more than 70% of the planned dose. The incidence and severity of adverse events reflected the known safety profile for docetaxel. Docetaxel clearance was reduced in patients with elevated concentrations of hepatic enzymes or bilirubin. Docetaxel is an active agent for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Intensified adjuvant therapy for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma: survival results and observations regarding patterns of failure, radiotherapy dose and CA19-9 levels

PURPOSE

Primary endpoints were 1. To determine if, in the context of postoperative adjuvant therapy of pancreatic and nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma, continuous infusion (C.I.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (Lv), combined with continuous-course external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to liver (23.4-27.0 Gy), regional lymph nodes (50.4-54.0 Gy) and tumor bed (50.4-57.6 Gy), followed by 4 months of C.I. 5-FU/Lv without EBRT could be given with acceptable toxicity. 2. To determine an estimate of disease-free and overall survival (DFS, OS) with this treatment in this context. Secondary endpoints were 1. To observe the effects of therapy at two different dose levels of irradiation, and 2. To observe for correlations among DFS, OS and CA 19-9 levels during therapy.

METHODS

Patients received C.I. 5-FU 200 mg/m2 and Lv 5 mg/m2 Monday through Friday during EBRT, and 4 cycles of the same chemotherapy without EBRT were planned for each 2 weeks of 4, beginning 1 month following the completion of EBRT. Therapy was to begin within 10 weeks of surgery and patients were monitored for disease recurrence, toxicity, and CA 19-9 levels before the start of EBRT/5-FU/Lv, before each cycle of C.I. 5-FU/Lv, and periodically after the completion of therapy. There were two EBRT dosage groups: Low EBRT, 23.4 Gy to the whole liver, 50.4 Gy to regional nodes and 50.4 Gy to the tumor bed; High EBRT, 27.0 Gy to the whole liver, 54.0 Gy to regional nodes, and 57.6 Gy to the tumor bed.

RESULTS

29 patients were enrolled and treated (23 with pancreatic cancer, and 6 with nonpancreatic periampullary cancer). Of these, 18 had tumor sizes > or = 3 cm and 23 had at least one histologically involved lymph node; 6 had histologically positive resection margins. Mean time to start of EBRT/5-FU/Lv was 53 +/- 2 days following surgery. The first 18 patients were in the Low EBRT Group and the last 11 in the High EBRT Group. Toxicity was moderate and manageable, including a possible case of late radiation hepatitis. Median DFS was 8.3 months (pancreatic cancer patients 8.5 months) and OS was 14.1 months (pancreatic cancer patients 15.9 months). Among patients with pancreatic cancer, results were similar for the Low and High EBRT Groups (DFS: 8.3 vs. 8.6 months; OS: 14.4 vs. 16.9 months, respectively). With a mean follow up of 2.6 +/- 0.3 years for the surviving patients and a minimal follow-up of 2.5 years, 27 of 29 pts have relapsed and 25 pts have died. A rise in CA 19-9 levels preceded clinical relapse by 9.1 +/- 1.5 months. Time to first relapse by site showed inverse correlation with dose of radiotherapy to that site: peritoneal (5 +/- 1 month), hepatic (7 +/- 0.9 months), regional nodes/tumor bed (9.6 +/- 1.8 months). Mean postresection CA 19-9 level was 63.3 +/- 16.2 U/ml. Postresection CA 19-9 values did not correlate with survival, margin status, or with the identification of metastatic carcinoma in resected lymph nodes. However, among patients with histologically involved nodes in the resected specimen, postresection CA 19-9 values did correlate with the number of positive nodes identified (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although toxicity was acceptable, survival results were not improved over those seen with standard adjuvant treatment. Most patients relapsed before the planned chemotherapy cycles were completed, or within 100 days thereof, suggesting disease resistance to C.I. 5-FU/Lv as used in this study. Although this regimen is not recommended for further study, the doses of EBRT utilized may be suitable for evaluation with other chemotherapy combinations. Postoperative CA 19-9 levels did not correlate with survival, but did correlate with the number of histologically involved lymph nodes found in the resected specimen among node-positive patients. Moreover, rising CA 19-9 levels anticipated ultimate clinical failure by 9 months.

La Chemioterapia Adiuvante Concomitante Del Carcinoma Pancreatico

Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer death. Despite improvement in diagnosis and treatment in the last 15 years, mortality rates essentially equal the incidence of the disease. Combination treatment with chemoradiation yields up to now better results than chemotherapy or radiotherapy given alone in consideration of substantial radio and chemoresistance of the cancer cells. This study will review the most important literature data about combination adjuvant treatment and preoperative (primary) chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer. Some other reports will be given on locoregional chemotherapy and finally a brief view on a possible perspective for promising future treatments coming from data of molecular pathology.

Adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery has been shown to be superior to operation alone in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer in many studies, in terms both of local control and median overall survival. Unfortunately, a consistent percentage of patients cannot receive adjuvant treatment since late recovery after surgery or postoperative morbidity. Owing to this last reason, many authors prefer primary chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment find out its background in other relevant biological and clinical evaluations.

Some studies report encouraging results with primary chemoradiation using 5-fluorouracil. Other experiences with relatively new drugs, with potent radiosensiting effect, such as gemcitabine or taxol are going on; many of these are phase I studies. Clinical research in the field of preoperative treatment is up to now emerging in some importants Oncological Institutions. The principal actual aim seems to be that of forsee periods of treatment which will be brief and use the dose of chemotherapy that is active, giving acceptable toxicity.

Ongoing trials will give, in the next years, the answer about the improvement of efficacy of treatments largely expected by all researchers.

Treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma with a combination of protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil and weekly carboplatin: a Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program Study

BACKGROUND

Advanced pancreatic cancer is a rapidly fatal disease whose course has been little influenced by chemotherapy. Earlier studies have shown some modest promise for the combination of protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil (PIF) and cisplatin. We sought to evaluate a regimen of possibly lesser toxicity, PIF plus weekly carboplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with a regimen of protracted infusional fluorouracil 300 mg/m2/day for 70 days and carboplatin 100 mg/m2/weekly on weeks 1 through 10 of a 12-week cycle. After a two-week rest, cycles were repeated until progression.

RESULTS

Median duration on treatment was 82 days (range 4-490 days). Toxicity was mild. Grade 3-4 toxicities were anemia 11%, leukopenia 6%, thrombocytopenia 2%, nausea/ vomiting 7%, diarrhea 9%, mucositis 9%, and renal 2%. Response was evaluable in 47 patients. There were two complete and seven partial responses (17% overall objective response rate among all patients). Stable disease for greater than 12 weeks was seen in 19 patients (40%) and progression in 19 (40%). The median overall survival was 22 weeks (1-99), with 61 weeks median survival in responders (22-99). One-year survival was 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

Response and survival results with this regimen are at least equal to the best combination regimens reported, and were obtained with a low overall rate of serious toxicity.