Intraventricular concentration times time (C x T) methotrexate and cytarabine for patients with recurrent meningeal leukemia and lymphoma

Ommaya reservoir use in pediatric ALL and NHL: a review at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

PURPOSE

The intraventricular route of chemotherapy administration, via an Ommaya Reservoir (OmR) improves drug distribution in the central nervous system (CNS) compared to the more commonly used intrathecal administration. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with intraventricular chemotherapy, focused on methotrexate, in patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (aged 7 days - 22.2 years) with 26 OmR placements were identified for a total of 25,009 OmR days between 1990 and 2019. Methotrexate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations (n = 124) were analyzed from 59 courses of OmR therapy in 15 patients. Twenty-one courses involved methotrexate dosing on day 0 only, whereas 38 courses involved booster dosing on days 1, 2, or both. We simulated the time CSF methotrexate concentrations remained > 1 µM for 3 days given various dosing regimens.

RESULTS

CSF methotrexate exposure was higher in those who concurrently received systemic methotrexate than via OmR alone (p < 10- 7). Our simulations showed that current intraventricular methotrexate boosting strategy for patients ≥ 3 years of age maintained CSF methotrexate concentrations ≥ 1 µM for 72 h 40% of the time. Alternatively, other boosting strategies were predicted to achieve CSF methotrexate concentrations ≥ 1 µM for 72 h between 46 and 72% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

OmR were able to be safely placed and administer intraventricular methotrexate with and without boost doses in patients from 7 days to 22 years old. Boosting strategies are predicted to increase CSF methotrexate concentrations ≥ 1 µM for 72 h.

Optimum Methotrexate Exposure in Patients With Suspected or Confirmed CNS Invasive Hematological Malignancies: A Systematic Critical Review

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

The present review aims to evaluate the current state-of-the-art dosing regimens of high-dose (HD) and intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize its therapeutic response and minimize associated toxicity, particularly in the central nervous system (CNS).

RESULTS

MTX is administered systemically in a HD regimen (>1 g/m 2 ) for the treatment of various hematological neoplasms. HD-MTX treatment becomes complicated by marked interindividual drug elimination variability. TDM is specified to manage this high variability. Approximately 3%-7% of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia are diagnosed with CNS involvement, and the incidence of CNS relapse in patients, despite receiving prophylaxis, ranges from 5% to 10%. HD-MTX penetrates the blood-brain barrier and can be administered intrathecally, making this drug an important component of chemotherapy regimens for patients with hematologic malignancies involving the CNS or those at high risk of CNS relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The major evidence found was that an MTX area under the curve target between 1000 and 1100 μmol hour -1 L is associated with better clinical outcomes. However, there seems to be a clinical gap in the prospective validation of HD and IT MTX management to optimize clinical outcomes and minimize toxicity, using the relationship between exposure level (area under the curve MTX) and optimal response to MTX, at systemic and CNS exposure.

Improving the Brain Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Childhood Brain Tumors

The central nervous system (CNS) may be considered as a sanctuary site, protected from systemic chemotherapy by the meninges, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Consequently, parenchymal and CSF exposure of most antineoplastic agents following intravenous (IV) administration is lower than systemic exposure. In this review, we describe the different strategies developed to improve delivery of antineoplastic agents into the brain in primary and metastatic CNS tumors. We observed that several methods, such as BBB disruption (BBBD), intra-arterial (IA) and intracavitary chemotherapy, are not routinely used because of their invasiveness and potentially serious adverse effects. Conversely, intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy has been safely and widely practiced in the treatment of pediatric primary and metastatic tumors, replacing the neurotoxic cranial irradiation for the treatment of childhood lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). IT chemotherapy may be achieved through lumbar puncture (LP) or across the Ommaya intraventricular reservoir, which are both described in this review. Additionally, we overviewed pharmacokinetics and toxic aspects of the main IT antineoplastic drugs employed for primary or metastatic childhood CNS tumors (such as methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, hydrocortisone), with a concise focus on new and less used IT antineoplastic agents.

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Equipped with On-Off Valves for Intraventricular Therapies in Patients with Communicating Hydrocephalus due to Leptomeningeal Metastases

Ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with a reservoir and a valve to manually switch off the shunt function can be used for intraventricular injections of therapeutics in patients suffering from a communicating hydrocephalus caused by leptomeningeal metastases. These shunt devices avoid the risk of injecting therapeutics through the distal leg of the shunt system into the intraperitoneal space, which may cause toxicity. Furthermore, regular intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics help to maintain sufficient concentrations in the ventricular space. Therefore, ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with an on-off valve are a useful tool to reliably inject chemotherapeutics into the ventricles. In order to systematically assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this procedure, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with leptomeningeal metastases who had received a shunt system at our institution. In total, six adult patients had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt equipped with an on-off valve implanted. Out of these six patients, two patients subsequently received intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics. The configuration of the valve setting and the intraventricular injections were easily feasible in the setting of a neuro-oncology department. The complication of a shunt leakage occurred in one patient following the first intraventricular injection. No extra-central nervous system (CNS) toxicities were observed. In summary, ventriculoperitoneal shunts with on-off valves are useful tools for reliable intraventricular administration of therapeutics.

Intracerebroventricular drug administration

Among the various routes of drug administration, perhaps the least studied is intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration. This route has been shown to be particularly useful in administering to the central nervous system (CNS) drugs that do not cross the blood-brain barrier readily. As such, the ICV route is a valuable option for providing therapeutic CNS drug concentrations to treat patients with CNS infectious and neoplastic diseases. This route of drug administration also has the advantage of minimizing systemic toxicity.

Treatment of recurrent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder of the central nervous system with high-dose methotrexate

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a frequent complication of intestinal transplantation and is associated with a poor prognosis. There is currently no consensus on optimal therapy. Recurrent PTLD involving the central nervous system (CNS) represents a particularly difficult therapeutic challenge. We report the successful treatment of CNS PTLD in a pediatric patient after liver/small bowel transplantation. Initial immunosuppression (IS) was with thymoglobulin, solucortef, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. EBV viremia developed 8 weeks posttransplantation, and despite treatment with cytogam and valganciclovir the patient developed a polymorphic, CD20+, EBV+ PTLD with peripheral lymphadenopathy. Following treatment with rituximab, the lymphadenopathy resolved, but a new monomorphic CD20−, EBV+, lambda-restricted, plasmacytoid PTLD mesenteric mass emerged. Complete response of this PTLD was achieved with 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy; however, 4 months off therapy he developed CNS PTLD (monomorphic CD20−, EBV+, lambda-restricted, plasmacytoid PTLD) of the brain and spine. IS was discontinued and HD-MTX (2.5–5 gm/m²/dose) followed by intrathecal HD-MTX (2 mg/dose ×2-3 days Q 7–10 days per cycle) was administered Q 4–7 weeks. After 3 cycles of HD-MTX, the CSF was negative for malignant cells, MRI of head/spine showed near-complete response, and PET/CT was negative. The patient remains in complete remission now for 3.5 years after completion of systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy. Conclusion. HD-MTX is an effective therapy for CNS PTLD and recurrent PTLD that have failed rituximab and CHOP chemotherapy.

Treatment of leptomeningeal spread of NSCLC: a continuing challenge

OPINION STATEMENT

Leptomeningeal metastasis is a serious and frequently fatal complication of non-small cell lung cancer. Curative treatment remains elusive, but careful use of radiation, systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and symptoms management can greatly improve quality of life and survival. For most patients, we recommend a combination of skull-based radiation with focal radiation to any symptomatic spinal segments followed by systemic chemotherapy. For patients with EGFR mutations, erlotinib may be used as first-line therapy in a daily or high-dose regimen. Pemetrexed has promise for use in patients with brain and leptomeningeal metastases. Patients with multiple comorbidities or low performance status may tolerate intrathecal therapy better than systemic chemotherapy. The most commonly used intrathecal chemotherapies are methotrexate and liposomal cytarabine, although newer agents, such as topotecan and mafosfamide, may be more effective. Elevated intracranial pressure, which causes headaches, vertigo, nausea, and vomiting, should be treated with dexamethasone and acetazolamide. In select patients, cerebrospinal fluid shunting may be considered. The use of antidepressants, central nervous system stimulants, benzodiazepines, antiemetics, and pain medications can increase quality of life in patients with leptomeningeal metastases.

Carcinomatous meningitis: Leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from metastatic spread of cancer to the leptomeninges, giving rise to central nervous system dysfunction. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most frequent causes of LM among solid tumors in adults. An early diagnosis of LM, before fixed neurologic deficits are manifest, permits earlier and potentially more effective treatment, thus leading to a better quality of life in patients so affected. Apart from a clinical suspicion of LM, diagnosis is dependent upon demonstration of cancer in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or radiographic manifestations as revealed by neuraxis imaging. Potentially of use, though not commonly employed, today are use of biomarkers and protein profiling in the CSF. Symptomatic treatment is directed at pain including headache, nausea, and vomiting, whereas more specific LM-directed therapies include intra-CSF chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and site-specific radiotherapy. A special emphasis in the review discusses novel agents including targeted therapies, that may be promising in the future management of LM. These new therapies include anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib in nonsmall cell lung cancer, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in breast cancer, anti-CTLA4 ipilimumab and anti-BRAF tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as vermurafenib in melanoma, and the antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab are currently under investigation in patients with LM. Challenges of managing patients with LM are manifold and include determining the appropriate patients for treatment as well as the optimal route of administration of intra-CSF drug therapy.

A phase-1 pharmacokinetic optimal dosing study of intraventricular topotecan for children with neoplastic meningitis: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium study

PURPOSE

We performed a phase-1 pharmacokinetic optimal dosing study of intraventricular topotecan (IT), administered daily 5×, to determine whether, the maximum tolerated dose of IT topotecan was also the pharmacokinetic optimal dose.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received topotecan administered through an intraventricular access device (0.1 or 0.2 mg/dose), daily × 5 every other week 2× (Induction); every 3 weeks × 2 (Consolidation); then every 4 weeks for up to 11 courses (Maintenance). Ventricular CSF pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1, week 1 of induction, and in a subset of patients after a single intralumbar topotecan dose on day 1, week 3.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled. All were evaluable for toxicity and 18 were assessable for pharmacokinetics. Arachnoiditis requiring corticosteroid therapy occurred in or one of three patients at the 0.1 mg dose level and two of the initial three patients enrolled at the 0.2 mg dose level. All subsequent patients were therefore treated with concomitant dexamethasone. Pharmacokinetic evaluation after accrual of the first seven patients revealed that a topotecan lactone concentration >1 ng/ml for 8 hours was attained in all patients and thus, further dose escalation was not pursued. Results of simulation studies showed that at the dose levels evaluated, >99.9% of patients are expected to achieve CSF topotecan lactone concentrations >1 ng/ml for at least 8 hours.

CONCLUSION

Intraventricular topotecan, 0.2 mg, administered daily for 5 days with concomitant dexamethasone is well tolerated and was defined to be the pharmacokinetic optimal dose in this trial.

Phase 2 clinical trial of intrathecal topotecan in children with refractory leptomeningeal leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group trial (P9962)

PURPOSE

We performed a phase 2 study in children with recurrent or refractory leptomeningeal leukemia to determine the objective response rate after treatment with intrathecal (IT) topotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received age-adjusted IT topotecan (0.4 mg/dose for patients >3 years of age) administered twice weekly (every 3-4 days) for 6 weeks during induction, weekly for 4 weeks during consolidation, and twice monthly for 4 months and then monthly thereafter during maintenance.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients enrolled in the study, of whom 20 were eligible and assessable for toxicity and 16 were assessable for response. Of 16 patients, 6 (38%) had a complete response, 8 (50%) had stable disease, and 2 (13%) had progressive disease. The median event-free survival time (95% CI) was 3.1 (1.6-10.3) months and the median overall survival time (95% CI) was 18.0 (7.3-38.3) months. Eight patients (40%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. There were no grade 4 neurological events (Table III). Four patients experienced a total of 6 grade 3 neurological events including an olfactory seizure, a headache, transient grade 3 speech impairment, muscle weakness, motor neuropathy, and ataxia. Headache was the most common grade ≤2 neurologic event and two patients developed grade ≤2 arachnoiditis.

CONCLUSION

IT administration of topotecan was tolerable on this dose and schedule. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate, reversible side effects. Complete central nervous system remissions were achieved in a subset of children with recurrent or refractory central nervous system leukemia.

Leukemias and lymphomas: treatment and prophylaxis of the central nervous system

Central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy is required for many acute leukemia patients and for nearly all aggressive or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients as part of an overall chemotherapy plan for disease eradication. The CNS therapy decisions differ for overt disease treatment versus prophylactic treatment and take into consideration the type of leukemia or lymphoma, the age of the patient, and other prognostic factors. A variety of CNS-directed therapies are used for prevention or treatment of CNS disease in acute leukemias or aggressive lymphomas: intrathecal medications (cytosine arabinoside, methotrexate, or both in combination with hydrocortisone) with or without cranial or craniospinal irradiation, intrathecal medication only with intensive systemic chemotherapy, or high-dose chemotherapy specifically chosen for CNS penetrance. Any type of CNS-directed therapy, whether intrathecal chemotherapy, high-dose systemic chemotherapy, or irradiation, may cause acute or delayed (late) toxicity. Ongoing clinical trial research aims to reduce the risk of toxicity from CNS-directed therapy while preserving or improving treatment efficacy.

Treatment of a CNS relapse while on therapy for Burkitt lymphoma

The treatment of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) has come a long way in regards to survival, with the majority of even the advanced stage patients being cured. The prognosis for relapsed BL remains dismal, despite attempts to further intensify therapy. We report on a patient with advanced stage BL who relapsed in the CNS while on therapy. The patient was successfully treated with an intensified regimen based on a concentration times time (C x T) CNS-directed model. Our experience shows both the feasibility and efficacy of such an approach in a patient with an otherwise very poor prognosis.

Evaluation of osmolality and pH of various concentrations of methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa prepared in normal saline, sterile water for injection, and lactated Ringer's solution for intrathecal administration

Background. Neurotoxicity of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy has been variously attributed to the preservatives, volume, osmolality, and pH of the preparations. There has been little evaluation of how different drug concentrations or diluents can affect the osmolality and pH of the final solution. We conducted a three-part study: survey of cancer centers regarding the drug concentrations and diluent used in preparing IT chemotherapy; review of the literature on common practice of preparing IT chemotherapy; evaluation of the pH and osmolality of commonly used chemotherapy preparations for IT.

Method. We surveyed selected cancer centers to provide information on their standard volume, drug concentrations, and choice of diluents. MEDLINE was searched for clinical reports using the MeSH terms of `cytarabine,' `methotrexate,' or `thiotepa' with the subheading `Cerebrospinal fluid' and combined with `intrathecal' in all database fields. Data retrieved included the choice of diluent, volume, and/or drug concentration. We evaluated the pH and osmolality of methotrexate (1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/mL), cytarabine (2, 5, 10, and 25 mg/mL), and thiotepa (1, 2, and 5 mg/mL) in normal saline, sterile water for injection (SWFI), and lactated Ringer's solution.

Results. Nine centers were surveyed (seven in Canada, one in Australia, one in United Kingdom). Most centers used 5mL of preservative-free normal saline, irrespective of the drug or drug concentration used. Forty-four reports in the literature were reviewed. Most reported 5 mL of preservative-free normal saline. Most information on drug concentrations was provided for methotrexate, with an average concentration of about 1—2.5 mg/ mL. Cytarabine 0.4—20 mg/mL and thiotepa 1 mg/mL were also reported. In our in vitro evaluation, there was a trend of increased pH associated with increasing concentration of methotrexate and cytarabine. There was no apparent impact of thiotepa concentration on the pH values of the final preparations, irrespective of the diluent used. Except for cytarabine 10 and 25 mg/mL, all the tested solutions have pH within 10% of the physiologic range of CSF. There was a concentration-dependent change in osmolality with methotrexate and cytarabine preparations. Osmolality was increased with increased concentrations in all except methotrexate mixed in SWFI and thiotepa mixed in normal saline and lactated Ringer's solution. Except for some thiotepa solutions, all the tested solutions have osmolality within 10% of the physiologic range of CSF.

Conclusions. There is limited published literature on the potential impact of diluent and drug concentration on the pH and osmolality of IT chemotherapy preparation. Most cancer centers conventionally prepare IT chemotherapy with 5mL of preservative diluent normal saline, irrespective of the specific drug or dose used. The conventional practice means that most methotrexate preparations are likely to have comparable pH and osmolality to CSF. In contrast, cytarabine preparations may show significantly higher pH than the CSF, while thiotepa preparations generally have lower osmolality than the CSF. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2009) 15: 45—52.

Continuous intrathecal treatment with methotrexate via subcutaneous port: implication for leptomeningeal dissemination of malignant tumors

Use of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy can extend survival of patients with untreated leptomeningeal dissemination of malignant tumors from one month to two to six months. The goal of the present study was to determine the effect of continuous IT (CIT) via a subcutaneous port that was placed using a neuronavigation system. Twenty patients with leptomeningeal dissemination (primary disease: 10 cancers, 6 gliomas and 4 lymphomas) were given 2-7 cycles of continuous IT (CIT) with methotrexate (MTX; 10 mg) administered into the lateral ventricle for 5 consecutive days biweekly. The concentration of MTX in the lateral ventricle was 7 to 10 x 10(-6 )M from Day 1 to 4. Response to this therapy included 6 patients with complete remission, 7 with progressive disease, and 7 with stable disease. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median overall survival of 8 months while the overall survival rate for leptomeningeal specific death or for metastasis from cancer was 13 or 5 months, respectively. Complications of CIT with MTX were relatively low (<0.5%), and nausea and vomiting did not occur in any of the patients. In conclusion, CIT with 10 mg MTX via subcutaneous port for 5 days may improve the therapeutic effect and reduce the complications associated with treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination from malignant tumors. This would be a safe technique with possible implications that bear repeating more patients.

New agents for intrathecal administration

Intrathecal administration of chemotherapy, with or without radiation therapy, is the primary treatment modality for the prevention and treatment of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with leukemia or lymphoma. Although this treatment strategy has been very effective for patients with hematological malignancies, currently available intrathecal agents are relatively ineffective for patients with neoplastic meningitis resulting from an underlying solid or CNS tumor effective. This article provides an overview of some of the practical considerations and limitations associated with intrathecal chemotherapy, and is followed by a comprehensive review of some of the preclinical and early phase clinical trials of novel anticancer agents and treatment strategies using the intrathecal route.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid malignancy: a review

Leptomeningeal metastases (LMM) consist of diffuse involvement of the leptomeninges by infiltrating cancer cells. In solid tumors, the most frequent primary sites are lung and breast cancers, two tumors where the incidence of LMM is apparently increasing. Careful neurological examination is required to demonstrate multifocal involvement of the central nervous system (CNS), cranial nerves, and spinal roots, which constitute the clinical hallmark of the disease. Cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) analysis is almost always abnormal but only a positive cytology or demonstration of intrathecal synthesis of tumor markers is diagnostic. T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced sequence of the entire neuraxis (brain and spine) plays an important role in supporting the diagnosis, demonstrating the involved sites and guiding treatment. Radionuclide CSF flow studies detect CSF compartmentalization and are useful for treatment planning. Standard therapy relies mainly on focal irradiation and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy. Studies using other therapeutic approaches such as new biological or cytotoxic compounds are ongoing. The overall prognosis remains grim and quality of life should remain the priority when deciding which treatment option to apply. However, a sub-group of patients, tentatively defined here, may benefit from an aggressive treatment.

Leptomeningeal cancer in the pediatric patient

The treatment and prophylaxis of leptomeningeal leukemia and lymphoma in children has dramatically improved disease control and long-term survival. However, the treatment of other leptomeningeal cancers has been less successful and the neurologic morbidity associated with central nervous system-directed therapy has a significant long-term impact on quality of life. Further research is critical to identify new therapeutic strategies for children with or at high risk for leptomeningeal cancer.

Pharmacokinetics Following Intraventricular Administration of Chemotherapy in Patients with Neoplastic Meningitis

Intraventricular administration of chemotherapy is one approach to overcoming the limited distribution of anticancer drugs and their active metabolites into the CNS. This form of regional chemotherapy has led to effective treatment of occult and overt meningeal leukaemia in humans. In contrast, the efficacy of this therapy is extremely limited in the treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination of various solid tumours. Pharmacokinetic studies of the commonly intraventricularly applied anticancer agents in humans have demonstrated that, using low drug doses, very high drug concentrations can be achieved in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and relatively high concentrations in the leptomeninges but not in the brain tissue and the plasma. Therefore, this approach is not an effective treatment for bulky disease of brain tissue, and results in minimal systemic toxicity. In comparison with intralumbar administration, lower interpatient variability of CSF drug concentrations and improved clinical efficacy were observed. 'Concentration x time' schedules, i.e. frequent small drug doses over a short period, enable long-term CSF exposure to cytotoxic drug concentrations while avoiding excessively high and potentially neurotoxic drug concentrations. The technique of ventriculolumbar cerebrospinal perfusion delivers continuously high drug concentrations throughout the CSF for several hours, but its widespread use is limited by the technical complexities of this approach. In this article, the dosages, schedules and pharmacokinetic data of routinely used intraventricular agents in humans, e.g. methotrexate, cytarabine, glucocorticoids and thiotepa, are outlined in detail. In addition, pharmacokinetic data of investigational agents for intraventricular administration (diaziquone, DTC 101, mercaptopurine, mafosfamide, etoposide, topotecan, nimustine [ACNU] and bleomycin) are presented. Better understanding of the CSF pharmacology of these drugs is an essential prerequisite for safe, effective administration of these drugs. Investigational efforts are underway to verify the feasibility and efficacy of different dosages, schedules and combination therapies of these new intra-CSF agents. Current and future clinical research should also focus on methods allowing the delivery of tumoricidal drug concentrations for extended periods into the CSF and the brain tissue while minimising neurotoxicity and systemic toxicity (e.g. liposomal drug preparations, monoclonal antibodies, immunotoxins and gene therapy).

CNS prophylaxis and treatment in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: variation in practice and lessons from the literature

Practices regarding central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis and treatment for non-"high-grade" lymphomas are not standardized. We designed a survey to address the CNS surveillance, prophylaxis and treatment (S + P + T) habits of Ontario oncologists, to compare tertiary with community care and gauge interest in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We mailed 145 questionnaires to oncologists/hematologists registered at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario between 1980 and 1999. The questionnaire posed questions of S + P + T for a variety of histologies, locations and risk factors. Results showed that 49/77 respondents treated adult NHL, (19 community, 30 tertiary care). Surveillance LP's were commonly done in testicular, orbital, sinus and epidural sites of presentation (76, 69, 71, 80%, respectively), but these were less commonly prophylaxed (45, 33, 29 and 41%). HIV associated NHL received surveillance and prophylaxis by 51 and 33% of respondents. Stage IV disease, increased LDH and extranodal-sites warranted infrequent S + P. IT chemotherapy via LP was the most commonly used form of prophylaxis (74%) or treatment (84%). Twenty percent used systemic agents that cross the blood brain barrier for prophylaxis, and 45% for treatment. A vast heterogeneity of practice within and between tertiary care and community physicians' practices was documented. Ninety percent of physicians indicated willingness to participate in a RCT. In conclusion, CNS surveillance and prophylaxis in non-"high-grade" NHL is highly variable, probably because there are poorly defined risk factors, inconclusive prophylaxis efficacy and the inconvenience/toxicity of therapy. Patients at high risk by International prognostic index criteria are at an increased risk for CNS relapse. A RCT comparing standard chemotherapy with or without CNS prophylaxis in selected patients is needed.

Schedule-dependent synergism and antagonism between methotrexate and cytarabine against human leukemia cell lines in vitro

Methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine have been widely used for the treatment of acute leukemias and lymphomas for over 30 years. However, the optimal schedule of this combination is yet to be determined and a variety of schedules of the combination has been used. We studied the cytotoxic effects of MTX and cytarabine in combination against human leukemia cell lines at various schedules in vitro. The effects of the combinations at the concentration of drug that produced 80% cell growth inhibition (IC(80)) were analyzed using the isobologram method of Steel and Peckham. Simultaneous exposure to MTX and cytarabine for 3 days produced antagonistic effects in human T cell leukemia, MOLT-3 and CCRF-CEM, B cell leukemia, BALL-1, Burkitt's lymphoma, Daudi, promyelocytic leukemia, HL-60 and Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia, K-562 cells. Simultaneous exposure to MTX and cytarabine for 24 h produced antagonistic effects, sequential exposure to MTX for 24 h followed by cytarabine for 24 h produced synergistic effects, and the reverse sequence produced additive effects in both CCRF-CEM and HL-60 cells. Sequential exposure to MTX for 24 h followed by cytarabine for 3 days also produced synergistic effects in MOLT-3 cells. Cell cycle analysis supported these observations. Our findings suggest that the simultaneous administration of MTX and cytarabine is not appropriate and the sequential administration of MTX followed by cytarabine may be the optimal schedule of this combination.

Intrathecal chemotherapy

An unforeseen consequence of improved disease-free survival in many hematologic and solid tumor malignancies has been an increase in the incidence of disease recurrence in the leptomeninges. The recognition of the central nervous system (CNS) as a unique 'sanctuary' site has resulted in the development of therapeutic strategies specifically directed at the leptomeninges. Although therapeutic strategies have been successful in the prevention and treatment of CNS leukemia, there are still a paucity of therapeutic options for patients with neoplastic meningitis due to solid tumors or recurrent CNS leukemia. This article provides an overview of the pharmacology and toxicity of intrathecal agents that are commonly employed in the treatment and prevention of leptomeningeal disease, and describes new agents that are in the early stages of clinical development.

Comparison of cytosine arabinoside delivery to rat brain by intravenous, intrathecal, intraventricular and intraparenchymal routes of administration

We evaluated the delivery of 14C-cytosine arabinoside (AraC) to rat brain by: 1) intravenous (IV) bolus, by 2) intrathecal (IT) and 3) intraventricular (IVT) infusion, and by 4) convection-enhanced delivery (CED) into the caudate nucleus. Plasma and brain AraC metabolites were measured with HPLC, and distribution and concentration of 14C-AraC in brain sections were measured by quantitative autoradiography. After IV administration, the alpha and beta plasma half-lives were 1.9 and 46.5 min, respectively. The blood-to-brain transfer constant of AraC was 2.5+/-1.4 microliter g(-1) min(-1), compatible with high water solubility. After IT and IVT administration, tissue levels were high at the brain and ventricular surfaces, but declined exponentially into brain. After CED, maximum brain levels were up to 10,000 times higher than the IV group, and the distribution pattern was one of high 14C-AraC concentration in the convective component, with exponentially declining concentrations outside this region. The rate loss constant from brain was 0.002+/-0.0004 min(-1), suggesting that AraC was accumulating in brain cells. AraC was metabolized into uracil arabinoside within the brain. 14C-AraC was infused into 1 dog and distributed widely in the ipsilateral hemisphere. These studies suggest that delivery of AraC to brain parenchyma by the IV, IT or IVT routes will be subtherapeutic. Delivery by CED can achieve, and maintain, therapeutic levels of AraC in the brain, and should be further evaluated as a potential method of drug delivery.