Methotrexate and leucovorin double-modulated 5-fluorouracil combined with cisplatin (MPFL) in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine the efficacy and safety profile of the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil modulated both by methotrexate and leucovorin in metastatic/recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were treated with cisplatin 40 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 24 hours on day 1; high-dose 5-fluorouracil 2,000 mg/m2/day and leucovorin 100 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 48 hours on days 1 and 2; methotrexate 40 mg/m2/day as a bolus infusion 4 hours before 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks in a cycle.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 25%, and 14% of the patients achieved stable disease status. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly improved overall survival in the disease-control group (12.0 months vs. 5.3 months, p<0.001). Only 3 (10.7%) patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and none developed grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This multiagent-containing regimen has an excellent safety profile and improved survival in disease-control group of patients with metastatic/recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients

BACKGROUND

A frequent complication of anticancer treatment, oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis, threatens the effectiveness of therapy because it leads to dose reductions, increases healthcare costs, and impairs patients' quality of life. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology assembled an international multidisciplinary panel of experts to create clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, evaluation, and treatment of mucositis.

METHODS

The panelists examined medical literature published from January 1966 through May 2002, presented their findings at two separate conferences, and then created a writing committee that produced two articles: the current study and another that codifies the clinical implications of the panel's findings in practice guidelines.

RESULTS

New evidence supports the view that oral mucositis is a complex process involving all the tissues and cellular elements of the mucosa. Other findings suggest that some aspects of mucositis risk may be determined genetically. GI proapoptotic and antiapoptotic gene levels change along the GI tract, perhaps explaining differences in the frequency with which mucositis occurs at different sites. Studies of mucositis incidence in clinical trials by quality and using meta-analysis techniques produced estimates of incidence that are presented herein for what to our knowledge may be a broader range of cancers than ever presented before.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the pathobiology of mucositis, its incidence, and scoring are essential for progress in research and care directed at this common side-effect of anticancer therapies.

Cisplatin, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II randomized study

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin (CDDP) is among the most active single agents against squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), and it is still the reference drug in the induction chemotherapy setting, when used in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Raltitrexed has been shown to be devoid of clinical activity against SCCHN when used alone; however, both preclinical and early clinical data regarding the combination raltitrexed-CDDP hold promise. Thymidylate synthase is the target enzyme of both raltitrexed and 5-FU; however, the two drugs have distinct sites of action on the enzyme and the combination of the two agents may be synergistic. We have previously shown that the combination of raltitrexed, levofolinic acid (LFA) and 5-FU has clinical activity against SCCHN; in a subsequent phase I study, cisplatin was added, and the combination of CDDP plus raltitrexed on day 1, followed by LFA and 5-FU on day 2, was judged feasible and active, since a 67% response rate was shown across all dose levels, with a 100% response rate at the recommended dose for phase II.

METHODS

Patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN, not pretreated with chemo- or radiotherapy were randomized to receive either CDDP 60 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 900 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm A) or CDDP 65 mg/m2 and methotrexate 500 mg/m2 on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m2 and 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on day 2 (arm B). Both treatments were repeated every 2 weeks. Evaluation for tumor response was performed after four cycles. According to Simon two-stage design, with a target complete response (CR) rate (p1) of 35%, at least 7 CR among the first 31 treated patients and 16 CR among the final sample size of 52 patients were required.

RESULTS

An interim analysis was performed when 36 patients were evaluable in each arm. In arm A, 10 CR (28%) and 19 partial responses (PR) (53%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 81%. In arm B, 3 CR (8%) and 12 PR (34%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 42%. The difference in both CR and overall response rate between the two arms was statistically significant (p = 0.03 and <0.001, respectively). Therefore, the accrual was stopped in arm B and continued only in arm A. Overall, 13 CR (21%) and 34 PR (56%) were observed among the 61 patients who were accrued in arm A, for an overall response rate of 77% (95% confidence interval 64-87%). Neutropenia was the main side effect in both arms (grade 3-4 in 45 and 23 patients in arm A and B, respectively). Extrahematologic toxicity was mild in both arms; however, 2 patients in arm B died due to toxicity (grade 4 mucositis in one case, grade 4 renal toxicity in the other).

CONCLUSIONS

Although response data for our experimental treatment look encouraging, the hypothesis of a 35% activity, expressed as capability to induce a CR, cannot be accepted. The results obtained in this study are not substantially different from those of other trials of CDDP-5-FU-based regimens, and our combination is unlikely to represent a major breakthrough when used in this setting.

Raltitrexed/5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy

Preclinical evidence of a schedule-dependent synergism between raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has prompted clinical studies of this combination. We review the main preclinical and clinical results of raltitrexed/5-FU-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy. Promising results include: response rates of 25 and 23% with combinations of raltitrexed/5-FU/levofolinic acid (LFA) as first-line treatment and oxaliplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, respectively; and a 67% response rate in a phase I study of cisplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as first-line treatment of advanced head and neck cancer, including a 100% response rate at the recommended dose. These combinations were well tolerated, with neutropenia as the main dose-limiting toxicity, allowing the drugs to be combined at the doses used in monotherapy. These results suggest a role for raltitrexed within combination regimens in colorectal cancer therapy, as well as other tumors such as head and neck cancer. A further potential application of raltitrexed in combination therapies is within multidisciplinary chemo-radiotherapy strategies, mainly in rectal cancer. Phase II studies are planned/ongoing to investigate these interesting possibilities.

Antitumour activity and side effects of combined treatment with chitosan and cisplatin in sarcoma 180-bearing mice

We examined the possible modulation by chitosan of the antitumour effects and side effects of cisplatin (cis-diaminedichloroplatinum, CDDP). The study showed that CDDP had potent antitumour activity when administered orally as well as intraperitoneally. We also compared the antitumour activity and side effects of orally administered CDDP plus orally administered chitosan versus intraperitoneally administered CDDP plus orally administered chitosan in sarcoma 180-bearing mice. When CDDP (1.25 mgkg(-1) x 2 day(-1)) was intraperitoneally administered to sarcoma 180-bearing mice, myelotoxicity (the reduction of leucocyte and platelet numbers), nephrotoxicity (the increase of blood nitrogen urea level), immunotoxicity (the reduction of spleen and thymus weight) and a reduction in body weight resulted. These intraperitoneally administered CDDP-induced side effects were not prevented by oral administration of chitosan (150 mgkg(-1) x 2 day(-1) and 750 mgkg(-1) x 2 day(-1)) for 14 consecutive days. On the other hand, the side effects such as the reductions of body and spleen weights induced by orally administered CDDP (1.25 mgkg(-1) x 2 day(-1)) were prevented by the oral administration of chitosan (150 mgkg(-1) x 2 day(-1) and 750 mg kg(-1) x 2 day(-1)). From these results, we conclude that the orally administered chitosan plus CDDP might be useful for the prevention of body weight reduction and immunotoxicity (the reduction of spleen weight) induced by the orally administered CDDP without diminishing antitumour activity.

Cisplatin, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I-II trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG)

BACKGROUND

The combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can be regarded as a reference regimen in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Raltitrexed (Tomudex) is a direct and specific thymidilate synthase (TS) inhibitor, which has shown clinical activity against SCCHN in a previous phase I study, when combined with 5-FU and levo-folinic acid (LFA). Preclinical data support the combination of CDDP and raltitrexed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of cisplatin, raltitrexed. LFA and 5-FU in a phase I-II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN were treated with a combination of cisplatin at the starting dose of 40 mg/m2. followed by raltitrexed at the starting dose of 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1; levo-folinic acid at fixed dose of 250 mg/m2, followed by 5-fluorouracil at the starting dose of 750 mg/m2 on day 2. Doses of the three cytotoxic agents were alternately escalated up to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Treatment was recycled every two weeks and given up to a maximum of eight courses; after chemotherapy, patients with locally advanced disease received a locoregional treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were entered into the study. Six dose levels were tested. At CDDP 50 mg/m2, raltitrexed 3 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2, four out of six patients showed DLT, which was in all cases grade 4 neutropenia. Therefore, this dose level was defined as maximum tolerated dose (MTD). CDDP 60 mg/m2, raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2, LFA 250 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2 was the dose level recommended for phase II. CDDP, Raltitrexed and 5-FU mean actually delivered dose intensities at the selected dose level were 26, 1.05, and 378 mg/m2/week, respectively. Neutropenia was the main side effect and was observed even at the lowest dose levels. Nonhematologic side effects were mild. Nine complete responses (20%) and twenty-one partial responses (47%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 67% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 51%-80%), according to intention to treat analysis. Fifteen of fifteen patients (100%) treated at the dose level selected for phase II had an objective response (5 complete responses, 10 partial responses).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our dose escalation clearly demonstrate that it is possible to combine CDDP, raltitrexed, and modulated 5-FU at effective doses, without unexpected toxicities. The response data point to an impressive clinical activity, which will be better defined by an ongoing large phase II study.