Evaluating patient's knowledge of maternal serum screening

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Standardized Video Education on Prenatal Genetic Testing Choices: Uptake of Genetic Testing

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the use of a standardized prenatal genetic testing educational video and its effects on patient uptake of prenatal testing, patient knowledge, decisional conflict, and decisional regret.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to intervention (standardized video education) or control (no video education). The video education group viewed a 5-minute educational video on genetic testing options, and the control group did not review the video. Both groups answered validated questionnaires to assess maternal knowledge (Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire [MSSK]), conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale [DCS]), and regret (Decisional Regret Scale [DRS]). The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake; secondary outcomes were knowledge-based test score, and level of decisional conflict and regret.

RESULTS

We enrolled 210 patients between 2016 and 2020, with 208 patients randomized, 103 patients in the video education group and 105 patients in the control group. Four patients were excluded from the video education group for missing data. Video education was associated with a 39% lower chance of prenatal testing compared with patients who did not receive video education, (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.92). Patients in the video education group had higher mean MSSKQ scores by 2.9 points (8.5 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Conflict Scores by 7.3 points (31.5 vs. 38.8, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Regret Scores by 5.4 points (23.8 vs. 29.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found that video education on prenatal genetic testing improved patients' knowledge, decreased testing and decisional conflict and regret regarding testing. This may indicate improved understanding of testing options and more informed decisions that align with their personal values and beliefs. This standardized video can be easily implemented in clinical practice to increase patient understanding and support decisions that align with patient's values.

KEY POINTS

· A standardized educational video improves patient knowledge about prenatal testing options in pregnancy.. · Video education decreases testing and decisional conflict and decisional regret in pregnancy.. · A standardized educational video may be used in the clinical setting to educate patients on testing options and help them make informed decisions about testing..

Multisite assessment of the impact of a prenatal testing educational App on patient knowledge and preparedness for prenatal testing decision making

In this study, we wanted to assess the impact of the use of a patient educational app on patient knowledge about noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and preparedness for prenatal screening decision-making. A randomized control study was carried out at three international sites between January 2019 and October 2020. Study participants completed a pre-consultation survey and post-consultation survey to assess knowledge, satisfaction, and preparedness for prenatal screening consultation. Providers completed a post-consultation survey. In the control arm, the pre-consultation survey was completed prior to consultation with their prenatal care provider. In the intervention arm, the pre-consultation survey was completed after using the app but prior to consultation with their prenatal care provider. Mean knowledge scores in the 203 participants using the app were significantly higher pre-consultation (p < 0.001) and post-consultation (p < 0.005) than those not using the app. Higher pre-consultation knowledge scores in the intervention group were observed at all sites. Most (86%) app users stated they were "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" with it as a tool. Providers rated the intervention group as more prepared than controls (p = 0.027); provider assessment of knowledge was not significantly different (p = 0.073). This study shows that clinical implementation of a patient educational app in a real-world setting was feasible, acceptable to pregnant people, and positively impacted patient knowledge.

Awareness of paternal age effect disorders among Japanese pregnant women: implications for prenatal genetic counseling for advanced paternal age

The increasing prevalence of advanced paternal age (APA) has mirrored the rise in maternal age. APA is associated with an increased risk of de novo pathogenic single-nucleotide variants, but this topic has been much less frequently discussed than advanced maternal age (AMA). To explore the awareness of pregnant women regarding paternal age effect (PAE) disorders, a self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted for pregnant women at their first prenatal visit before 17 weeks of gestation. A total of 120 valid respondents (95.2%) were included in the analyses. Of these, 63.3% of pregnant women were aware of PAE disorders. This was markedly lower than the 90.8% recognition of maternal age effect (MAE) disorders. One-third of women with awareness of MAE disorders were not aware of PAE disorders. Pregnant women who were parous, older than their male partners, with knowledge of prenatal testing prior to this pregnancy, and with experience of prenatal testing in a prior pregnancy were significantly more aware of PAE disorders than others. Awareness of PAE disorders was not associated with undergoing prenatal testing during the present pregnancy. Our results show that the prevalence of pregnant women's awareness of PAE disorders was lower than that of MAE disorders. The current study served as a preliminary baseline of information about pregnant women's awareness of PAE disorders. With the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing, which has the potential to identify PAE disorders, these findings will help the development of a framework for comprehensive prenatal genetic counseling for APA pregnancies.

Informed Decision Making Regarding Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening

OBJECTIVE

To explore informed decision making for prenatal aneuploidy screening (PAS) by investigating the relationships among women's understanding of PAS, their health literacy, and their satisfaction with their decisions regarding PAS.

DESIGN

A descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational study.

SETTING

Southeastern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-five adult women who were at least 18 weeks pregnant; most were White non-Hispanic (n = 75, 78.9%) and college educated (n = 56, 59.0%).

METHODS

Potential participants were invited to complete an online survey that was distributed via e-mail to recipients of an electronic pregnancy and parenting newsletter. The survey included questions about women's understanding of PAS, their health literacy, and their satisfaction with their decisions regarding PAS based on three validated instruments. I used descriptive statistics, bivariate correlational analysis, and multiple linear regression to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Higher level of education (β =.225, p = .038) and higher scores from the Health Literacy Questionnaire's scale Ability to Actively Engage With Health Care Providers (β =.317, p = .004) were significantly associated with increased understanding of PAS. Higher scores on two scales from the Health Literacy Questionnaire, Feeling Understood andSupportedby Health Care Providers (β =.329 , p = .004) and Ability to Find Good Health Information (β = .402, p = .013), were significantly associated with greater satisfaction with decisions regarding prenatal aneuploidy screening. Forty-two percent (n = 40) of participants did not report satisfaction with PAS.

CONCLUSION

A woman's health literacy and her ability to actively engage with health care providers are critical for informed decision making about PAS. Findings highlight the need for woman-centered strategies to promote open and intentional communication about PAS.

Use of a novel computerized decision aid for aneuploidy screening: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose:

To assess whether knowledge following use of a decision aid (DA) for aneuploidy screening and testing is inferior to knowledge in women who saw a genetic counselor (GC) only.

Methods:

This is a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of pregnant women at ≤22 weeks. Women who were scheduled for GC were randomly allocated to use a DA before GC or to GC alone. The primary outcome was knowledge score, comparing women who had used the DA only to those who saw GC alone. Analysis was by intent to treat.

Results:

Between 01–10/2017, 197 women were randomized, 105 to GC only and 92 to DA use before GC. Demographics and baseline knowledge were similar between groups. Mean knowledge score following DA use was not inferior to mean knowledge score following GC only (10.4 vs 10.6, p=0.306). Decisional conflict was similar following completion of the DA to following GC only, but was reduced following completion of both the DA and GC compared to GC only (0.22 vs. 1.74, p=0.003).

Conclusion:

Knowledge surrounding aneuploidy screening in women who used a DA was not inferior to knowledge in women who underwent GC. Use of the DA in addition to GC reduced decisional conflict.

Pregnant women of South Asian ethnicity in Canada have substantially lower vitamin B12 status compared with pregnant women of European ethnicity

Maternal vitamin B12 (B12) status has been inversely associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and positively with fetal growth and infant development. South Asians, Canada's largest ethnic minority, are prone to B12 deficiency. Yet, data are lacking on B12 status in South Asian pregnant women in North America. We sought to determine B12 status, using multiple biomarkers, in 1st and 2nd trimester pregnant women of South Asian and, for comparison, European ethnicity living in Vancouver, Canada. In this retrospective cohort study, total B12, holotranscobalamin (holoTC), methylmalonic acid (MMA), and total homocysteine concentrations were quantified in two routinely collected (mean gestational week: 11·5 (range 8·3-13·9) and 16·5 (range 14·9-20·9)), banked serum samples of 748 healthy pregnant South Asian (n 371) and European (n 377) women. South Asian pregnant women had significantly lower B12 status than European pregnant women at both time points, as indicated by lower serum total B12 and holoTC concentrations, and higher MMA concentrations (all P≤0·001). The largest difference, which was substantial (Cohen's d≥0·5), was observed in mean serum total B12 concentrations (1st trimester: 189 (95 % CI 180, 199) v. 246 (95 % CI 236, 257) pmol/l; 2nd trimester: 176 (95 % CI 168, 185) v. 226 (95 % CI 216, 236) pmol/l). Further, South Asian ethnicity was a significant negative predictor of B12 status during pregnancy. South Asian women living in Vancouver have substantially lower B12 status during early pregnancy. Future research identifying predictors and health consequences of this observed difference is needed to allow for targeted interventions.

Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results

Objective To determine patient perception of residual risk after receiving a negative non-invasive prenatal testing result. Introduction Recent technological advances have yielded a new method of prenatal screening, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which uses cell-free fetal DNA from the mother's blood to assess for aneuploidy. NIPT has much higher detection rates and positive predictive values than previous methods however, NIPT is not diagnostic. Past studies have demonstrated that patients may underestimate the limitations of prenatal screening; however, patient perception of NIPT has not yet been assessed. Methods and Materials We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess patient understanding of the residual risk for aneuploidy after receiving a negative NIPT result. Ninety-four participants who had prenatal genetic counseling and a subsequent negative NIPT were surveyed. Results There was a significant decline in general level of worry after a negative NIPT result (p = <0.0001). The majority of participants (61%) understood the residual risk post NIPT. Individuals with at least four years of college education were more likely to understand that NIPT does not eliminate the chance of trisomy 13/18 (p = 0.012) and sex chromosome abnormality (p = 0.039), and were more likely to understand which conditions NIPT tests for (p = 0.021), compared to those women with less formal education. Conclusion These data demonstrate that despite the relatively recent implementation of NIPT into obstetric practice, the majority of women are aware of its limitations after receiving genetic counseling. However, clinicians may need to consider alternative ways to communicate the limitations of NIPT to those women with less formal education to ensure understanding.

Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate a decision aid designed to prepare patients of advanced maternal age for counseling about prenatal diagnostic testing.

SETTING

A regional genetics center.

DESIGN

A before/after study.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants used an audioguided workbook to learn about options and outcomes and to clarify personal risks, values, questions, and predispositions.

SUBJECTS

21 women of advanced maternal age and 17 spouses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Knowledge of prenatal testing alternatives, decisional conflict, level of anxiety, and acceptability of the decision aid.

RESULTS

After using the decision aid, participants had significantly reduced decisional conflict (uncertainty) and a significant increase in knowledge. There was no effect on state or trait anxiety. More than three-quarters of participants were satisfied with the length, clarity, balance, and acceptability of the decision aid.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision aid shows promise as a useful aid for preparing couples for counseling.

[Assessment of patients' knowledge of first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening at the time of their first trimester ultrasonographic evaluation: Results of a prospective study about 201 women]

OBJECTIVE

Assess pregnant women's knowledge on first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening, at the time of their first trimester ultrasound scan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was submitted to the patients coming for their 12-week pregnancy ultrasonographic evaluation in a University Hospital prenatal clinic between May 2012 and May 2013. Correct and incorrect statements on Down syndrome screening were proposed to the mothers who were asked to rate them. Each patient was questioned on her prior exposition to Down syndrome screening, the category of medical of professional she previously consulted, and the information she received. Patients' knowledge was evaluated according to these criteria.

RESULTS

Two hundred and one patients were included in this study. The average correct answer rating was 4.6 (out of 8 questions). The average incorrect answer rating was 2.4 (out of 6 questions). No difference was found between the different social and demographic groups, nor according to the category of professional consulted before the first ultrasound scan. Higher correct answer ratings were observed when the patient had already been submitted to a Down syndrome screening (P=0.039), when they had previously received explanations about the screening (P=0.003); and when they stated that they had been sufficiently informed (P=0.042).

CONCLUSION

These results show that patients' knowledge on Down syndrome screening is inadequate and depends on their experience of previous screening and information. It is deemed necessary to improve information especially to young women who are pregnant for the first time.

Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review

Genetic screening and health-care guidelines recommend that programmes should facilitate informed choice. It is therefore important that accurate measures of informed choice are available to evaluate such programmes. This review synthesises and appraises measures used to evaluate informed choice in population-based genetic screening programmes for reproductive risk. Databases were searched for studies offering genetic screening for the purpose of establishing reproductive risk to an adult population sample, in which aspects of informed choice were measured. Studies were included if, at a minimum, measures of uptake of screening and knowledge were used. Searches identified 1462 citations and 76 studies were reviewed in full text; 34 studies met the inclusion criteria. Over 20 different measures of informed choice were used. Many measures lacked adequate validity and reliability data. This systematic review will inform future evaluation of informed choice in population genetic screening programmes.

Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

Prenatal genetic testing guidelines recommend providing patients with detailed information to allow informed, preference-based screening and diagnostic testing decisions. The effect of implementing these guidelines is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of a decision-support guide and elimination of financial barriers to testing on use of prenatal genetic testing and decision making among pregnant women of varying literacy and numeracy levels.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Randomized trial conducted from 2010-2013 at prenatal clinics at 3 county hospitals, 1 community clinic, 1 academic center, and 3 medical centers of an integrated health care delivery system in the San Francisco Bay area. Participants were English- or Spanish-speaking women who had not yet undergone screening or diagnostic testing and remained pregnant at 11 weeks' gestation (n = 710).

INTERVENTIONS

A computerized, interactive decision-support guide and access to prenatal testing with no out-of-pocket expense (n = 357) or usual care as per current guidelines (n = 353).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was invasive diagnostic test use, obtained via medical record review. Secondary outcomes included testing strategy undergone, and knowledge about testing, risk comprehension, and decisional conflict and regret at 24 to 36 weeks' gestation.

RESULTS

Women randomized to the intervention group, compared with those randomized to the control group, were less likely to have invasive diagnostic testing (5.9% vs 12.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.80]) and more likely to forgo testing altogether (25.6% vs 20.4%; OR, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.43-7.64], reference group screening followed by invasive testing). Women randomized to the intervention group also had higher knowledge scores (9.4 vs 8.6 on a 15-point scale; mean group difference, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.34-1.31]) and were more likely to correctly estimate the amniocentesis-related miscarriage risk (73.8% vs 59.0%; OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.39-2.75]) and their estimated age-adjusted chance of carrying a fetus with trisomy 21 (58.7% vs 46.1%; OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.22-2.28]). Significant differences did not emerge in decisional conflict or regret.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Full implementation of prenatal testing guidelines using a computerized, interactive decision-support guide in the absence of financial barriers to testing resulted in less test use and more informed choices. If validated in additional populations, this approach may result in more informed and preference-based prenatal testing decision making and fewer women undergoing testing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00505596.

Patient and provider attitudes toward screening for Down syndrome in a Latin American country where abortion is illegal

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient and provider attitudes toward first trimester nuchal translucency (NT) screening for Down syndrome and to assess how patients consent to screening in a country where abortion is illegal.

METHODS

Patients presenting for first trimester ultrasound including NT screening in two obstetric units in Chile completed a questionnaire about their attitudes toward NT screening and perspectives on the consent process. A follow-up questionnaire assessed satisfaction with the test. Prenatal care providers also completed a questionnaire ascertaining their perspectives on NT screening.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients completed the initial questionnaire and 78 completed the follow-up questionnaire. Although 98 (94%) patients desired NT screening only 38 (38%) indicated that they would undergo diagnostic testing if they received screen positive results. Only 3 patients screened positive; however, 15 (20%) participants experienced increased anxiety after the test. Almost all of the 36 providers surveyed indicated that they counsel their patients thoroughly, but 38 (39%) patients reported that they received adequate information.

CONCLUSION

NT screening is often performed without patients' full understanding of the implications of potential results and may cause anxiety. Providers should elicit patients' preferences regarding prenatal testing and engage them in shared decision making about whether to undergo screening, particularly when abortion is not an option.

Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: what knowledge is relevant?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the content of decision-relevant knowledge needed for informed decision-making about (non-) participation in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome (DS), in order to develop a knowledge questionnaire for routine application in large-scale programme evaluations.

METHODS

A generic list of content domains for knowledge about screening was extracted from the literature. Items reflecting specific knowledge domains were constructed. An expert group of professionals and pregnant women expressed whether domains and items represented decision-relevant information.

RESULTS

All presented domains were scored as (very) important. Options when receiving an 'increased probability for DS' test result, the meaning of this result, the aim of the screening, and voluntary nature of the test were scored as most important. The condition being screened for, prevalence, and the screening procedure were scored as relatively less important, with a high amount of expert consensus.

CONCLUSION

A knowledge measure for prenatal screening for DS was developed, based on domains and items acquired by expert consensus.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This measure of decision-relevant knowledge can be used in routine, large-scale evaluations of the procedure for offering information about prenatal screening for DS.

First-trimester Down syndrome screening: pregnant women's knowledge

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to assess pregnant women's knowledge of first-trimester combined Down syndrome screening in a setting of required informed consent. As the secondary aim, we wanted to identify relevant differences in knowledge level among subgroups of pregnant women, including those informed in different ways about prenatal examinations.

METHODS

Data stem from a population-based cross-sectional questionnaire study including 15 multiple-choice questions assessing knowledge of different aspects of screening. Included were 6427 first-trimester pregnant women from three Danish obstetric departments offering prenatal screening free of charge. Both participants and non-participants in the screening program were included. The results are based on 4095 responders (64%). Differences between subgroups were examined using chi-squared tests and logistic regression analysis. Estimates are stated with 95% CI.

RESULTS

The majority of the participants (87.6 (86.6-88.6)% to 92.6 (91.7-93.3)%) correctly identified the test concept and the main condition being screened for. Fewer participants (16.4 (15.3-17.6)% to 43.3 (41.8-44.8)%) correctly recognized test accuracy and the potential risk of adverse findings other than Down syndrome. Knowledge level was positively associated with length of education (adjusted ORs 1.0 (0.8-1.4) to 3.9 (2.4-6.4)) and participation in the screening program (adjusted OR 0.9 (0.6-1.3) to 5.9 (3.9-8.8)). Participation in an individual information session was weakly associated with more knowledge.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the pregnant women correctly identified the test concept and the main condition being screened for. The pregnant women were found less knowledgeable on test accuracy and drawbacks.

Pediatric ethics guidelines for hereditary medullary thyroid cancer

Hereditary medullary thyroid cancer is an aggressive cancer for which there is no standard effective systemic therapy, but which can be prevented through genetic screening and prophylactic thyroidectomy. Although this cancer accounts for roughly 17% of all pediatric thyroid cancers, a significant percentage of affected families do not "accept" screening, while many gene carriers delay or refuse prophylactic thyroid surgery for their children. Current genetic screening practices in medullary thyroid cancer are inadequate; more than 50% of index patients with hereditary medullary thyroid cancer present with a thyroid mass; up to 75% have distant metastasis. These proposed pediatric ethics guidelines focus on two ethical issues that affect at-risk children: (1) how do we identify at-risk children whose RET-positive relative refuses to disclose that they carry the mutation? (2) How do we protect RET-positive children whose parents refuse prophylactic thyroidectomy?

Age differences in genetic knowledge, health literacy and causal beliefs for health conditions

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the levels of genetic knowledge, health literacy and beliefs about causation of health conditions among individuals in different age groups.

METHODS

Individuals (n = 971) recruited through 8 community health centers in Suffolk County, New York, completed a one-time survey.

RESULTS

Levels of genetic knowledge were lower among individuals in older age groups (26-35, p = 0.011; 36-49, p = 0.002; 50 years and older, p<0.001) compared to those in the youngest age group (18-25). Participants in the oldest age group also had lower health literacy than those in the youngest group (p <0.001). Those in the oldest group were more likely to endorse genetic (OR = 1.87, p = 0.008) and less likely to endorse behavioral factors like diet, exercise and smoking (OR = 0.55, p = 0.010) as causes of a person's body weight than those in the youngest group. Higher levels of genetic knowledge were associated with higher likelihood of behavioral attribution for body weight (OR = 1.25, p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Providing additional information that compensates for their lower genetic knowledge may help individuals in older age groups benefit from rapidly emerging genetic health information more fully. Increasing the levels of genetic knowledge about common complex diseases may help motivate individuals to engage in health promoting behaviors to maintain healthy weight through increases in behavioral causal attributions.

Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to inform researchers and policymakers about what validated outcome measures are available to evaluate clinical genetics services (CGS) and the need for new measures.

METHODS

Validated outcome measures used to evaluate CGS were identified from a systematic literature review. Subjective outcome measures were assumed to have been validated only if some form of psychometric assessment was reported.

RESULTS

A total of 1688 titles and abstracts were identified, and 61 articles met the inclusion criteria for the final review, which covered 67 validated outcome measures. There were 37 nongenetics-specific and 30 genetics-specific measures identified. No single validated outcome measure encompassed all potential patient benefits from using a CGS. A variety of different domains were identified, including anxiety and depression, coping, decision-making, distress, family environment, health status, knowledge, mood, perception of risk, perceived personal control, psychological impact, quality of life, satisfaction and expectations, self-esteem, spiritual well-being, and worry. Some important aspects of patient benefit from CGS are not covered by existing outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

New research is necessary to develop the array of outcome measures required to quantify the benefits CGS offer patients living with the effects of genetic conditions. These need to be suitable for use in prospective evaluation studies to provide robust evidence for decision-makers to inform service development and commissioning. This includes prioritization of the existing validated outcome measures in terms of their usefulness and relevance to the measurement and valuation of patient benefits from a CGS.

Assessment of Psychosocial Outcomes in Genetic Counseling Research: An Overview of Available Measurement Scales

The aim of the present paper was to describe and evaluate many of the measurement scales currently used in genetic counseling outcomes research. A team of three researchers reviewed the available literature and selected a variety of validated instruments suitable for measurement of genetic counseling outcomes. There are numerous scales to assess each of the following outcomes among counselees: satisfaction with genetic counseling; knowledge; decision-making; psychological adjustment; coping; perceived personal control; perceptions of disease risk; and family communication about genetic risk. However, the strengths and limitations inherent to each instrument warrant careful consideration prior to implementation. In the genetic counseling context, scale selection should be undertaken with thought directed towards the characteristics of the research sample (e.g. levels of literacy, culture, medical condition), the practicalities of the research setting (e.g. available funding and resources, time restrictions, researcher expertise), the purpose of the research (i.e. the specific aspect of the genetic counseling experience to be studied), and the science underlying the scale (e.g. theoretical framework, psychometric properties).

How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a French study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the level of information and informed consent for maternal serum screening (MSS) for Down syndrome (DS) in the second trimester of pregnancy and analyse the exercise of autonomy towards the test by the women concerned.

METHODS

We studied the population of pregnant women attending obstetric consultations in two French hospitals over a 3-month period. The women were assigned to three groups according to MSS results for DS: women at high risk of having a child with DS (group 1), women at low risk (group 2) and women who did not undergo the test (group 3). A questionnaire was completed before the medical consultation, to assess the quality of consent before amniocentesis for the group at high risk and before the second-trimester ultrasound scan for the other two groups.

RESULTS

We analysed 305 questionnaires for 89, 137 and 79 women belonging to groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively. In total, 123 women (40.3% [IC 95%, 35-46%]) were considered to be well informed; 33 (10%, [IC 95%, 8-12%]) had a high level of knowledge, but made choices not consistent with their stated attitude, and 149 (49.7% [IC 95%, 45-56%]) were considered uninformed. Logistic regression analysis showed that maternal consent depended on three independent components: The score attributed to the doctor for information about MSS (t = 4.216, p < 0.001). Whether the patient belonged to group 1 (t = -2.631, p < 0.009). Educational level (< high-school diploma, high-school diploma or at least two years of higher education after high school) (t = 2.324, p < 0.02). The rate of consent increased with educational level and was highest for the women in group 1 and for those whose doctor had a high information score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings clearly show that women are provided with insufficient information concerning MSS screening for DS in the second trimester of pregnancy for real and valid consent to be obtained.

Health literacy and patient understanding of screening tests for aneuploidy and neural tube defects

OBJECTIVE

To determine if health literacy is associated with patient understanding of prenatal screening tests for fetal aneuploidy and neural tube defects.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study on a cohort of English-speaking patients receiving prenatal care in two resident-staffed ambulatory clinics. Health literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-7. Understanding of the prenatal screening tests was assessed using a modified Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Over an 8-month period, 125 patients were approached, and 101 (81%) consented to the study. Thirty-eight (38%) women demonstrated low health literacy. Patients with low health literacy were more likely to demonstrate inadequate understanding when compared to those with adequate health literacy (97% versus 11%, respectively; P < 0.01). Similarly, patients with < 12th grade education were more likely to have inadequate understanding when compared to patients with > 12th grade education (53% versus 30%, respectively; P = 0.02). Health literacy is a more sensitive and specific predictor of inadequate understanding than education (sensitivity 84% versus 70%, respectively, P < 0.05; specificity 98% versus 47%, respectively, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with low health literacy are more likely to demonstrate inadequate understanding of these prenatal screening tests than women with adequate health literacy.

Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Informed choice for prenatal screening has long been considered an essential aspect of service provision, and has been researched extensively in the second trimester. This study aims at examining whether women having first-trimester screening in a private clinic had made an informed choice.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey recruited women having first-trimester screening at specialist ultrasound practices. Two questionnaires containing a validated Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice (MMIC) were self-administered pre- and post-screening.

RESULTS

MMIC was completed by 81% (163/202) of women. Ninety-nine percent of women had a positive attitude towards screening, therefore informed choice was essentially measured on knowledge alone. Pre-screening, 68% made an informed choice, compared with 74% post-screening (chi2 = 1.6, p = 0.21 (McNemar)). Knowledge was associated with education level, information sources and perception of screening as routine or optional.

CONCLUSIONS

The Australasian Guidelines on prenatal screening state that all women having testing should be provided with written information, and it should be ensured that they have appropriate understanding of the test(s). These guidelines are not being met, even in private clinical care. Health professionals should ensure that all women are provided with suitable information about prenatal screening that is tailored to their level of education and individual needs, and should emphasise that screening is optional.

Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening?

PURPOSE

Prenatal screening should enable pregnant women to make informed choices. An informed decision is defined as being based on sufficient, relevant information and consistent with the decision maker's values. This study aims to assess to what extent pregnant women make informed choices about prenatal screening, and to assess the psychological effects of informed decision-making.

METHODS

The study sample consisted of 1159 pregnant women who were offered the nuchal translucency measurement or the maternal serum screening test. Level of knowledge, value consistency, informed choice, decisional conflict, satisfaction with decision, and anxiety were measured using questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 83% were classified as having sufficient knowledge about prenatal screening, 82% made a value-consistent decision to accept or decline prenatal screening, and 68% made an informed decision. Informed choice was associated with more satisfaction with the decision, less decisional conflict (this applied only to test acceptors), but was not associated with less anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Although the rate of informed choice is relatively high, substantial percentages of women making uninformed choices due to insufficient knowledge, value inconsistency, or both, were found. Informed choice appeared to be psychologically beneficial. The present study underlines the importance of achieving informed choice in the context of prenatal screening.

A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients

Prenatal diagnosis (PND) is offered routinely as part of pregnancy care to a large number of women at increased risk of fetal anomalies. Despite an extraordinary growth in the use of PND and significant resource allocation, few studies have examined outcomes of PND counseling, and virtually no research has evaluated the relative efficacy of various approaches to genetic counseling. This study was a randomized trial that compared which counseling methods - individual, group, and use of a decision aid - are effective in PND counseling for women of advanced maternal age (>/=35 years) and their partners. Three hundred and fifty-two women and 225 partners completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires assessing changes in knowledge, decisional conflict, state anxiety, satisfaction, use of PND, and pregnancy outcomes. All participants showed a significant increase in knowledge and a decrease in decisional conflict post intervention. Those in the group intervention showed a significantly greater increase in knowledge than those in the individual counseling intervention. While high levels of satisfaction were reported by all, those in individual counseling were significantly more satisfied than those receiving group counseling or the decision aid. This study has shown unique benefits with each type of intervention such that women and their partners preferred individual genetic counseling, while they learned best in group-counseling sessions, and experienced the least decisional conflict regarding genetic testing with a decision aid.

Stress, social support, and emotional distress in a community sample of pregnant women

Emotional distress in women during pregnancy has been shown to increase the risk of adverse outcomes for women and newborns. Increasingly, assessment and management of mood and anxiety problems during pregnancy entail consideration of life stress and interpersonal relationships with partners, friends, and family members. This study describes cross-sectional relations between life stress, perceived social support, and symptoms of depression and anxiety as well as the mediating influence of social support on relations between stress and symptoms. A community sample of women (N = 2,052) provided self-report data during their second trimester of pregnancy. Empirical fit was found for a structural equation model that depicted the combined influences of sociodemographic factors (i.e., socioeconomic status, age, parity), stress (partner conflict and life events), and social support on symptoms of depression and anxiety, chi2 (df 51) = 310.65, p <.05; CFI=.91. Women who reported low levels of social support showed stronger relations between stress and symptoms than women who reported high levels of social support--indicative of a mediating effect of social support. Consistent with previous studies, results suggest that dyadic psychosocial assessment of pregnant women and their partners may facilitate interventions to augment support networks, thereby reducing the risk of emotional distress.

Psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: cross sectional questionnaire study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the psychological impact on women of being tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) when smear test results are borderline or mildly dyskaryotic.

DESIGN

Cross sectional questionnaire study.

SETTING

Two centres participating in an English pilot study of HPV testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results.

PARTICIPANTS

Women receiving borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results tested for HPV and found to be HPV positive (n = 536) or HPV negative (n = 331); and women not tested for HPV with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear results (n = 143) or normal smear results (n = 366).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

State anxiety, distress, and concern about test result, assessed within four weeks of receipt of results.

RESULTS

Women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear results who were HPV positive were more anxious, distressed, and concerned than the other three groups. Three variables independently predicted anxiety in HPV positive women: younger age (beta = -0.11, P = 0.03), higher perceived risk of cervical cancer (beta = 0.17, P < 0.001), and reporting that they did not understand the meaning of test results (beta = 0.17, P = 0.001). Testing HPV negative was not reassuring: among women with abnormal smear test results, those who were HPV negative were no less anxious than those who were not tested for HPV.

CONCLUSIONS

Informing women more effectively about the meaning of borderline or mildly dyskaryotic smear test results and HPV status, in particular about the absolute risks of cervical cancer and the prevalence of HPV infection, may avoid some anxiety for those who are HPV positive while achieving some reassurance for those who test HPV negative.

The voices and concerns about prenatal testing of Cambodian, Lao and Vietnamese women in Australia

OBJECTIVES

to examine how Cambodian, Lao and Vietnamese women experience prenatal testing and to examine their knowledge and communication with health-care providers.

SETTING

Melbourne Metropolitan Area, Victoria, Australia.

DESIGN

an ethnographic study of childbearing and childrearing among women born in South-east Asia and now living in Melbourne, Australia reporting in-depth interviews with 67 women who had given birth in Australia.

FINDINGS

nearly all the women had prenatal testing as advised by their doctors and their main concerns were about their unborn baby and the need to follow doctors' advice. The women felt 'indifferent' towards prenatal testing, perceiving it as a normal part of antenatal care in Australia. Despite agreeing to undertake prenatal testing, the women did not have adequate understanding of the tests. This may be due to lack of information per se or inadequate communication between health providers and women.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

inevitably, the onus rests with the health-care provider to ensure that all options available to women are understood, so that women can make a positive and informed choice regardless of their social or cultural background. This will lead to women's increased satisfaction with care during pregnancy.

Mothers' knowledge of screening for trisomy 21 in 1999: a survey in Paris maternity units

OBJECTIVE

To assess mothers' knowledge of screening tests for trisomy 21.

STUDY DESIGN

Interview of all women who had recently delivered a healthy child and were present in 15 Paris maternity units during one of the two non-consecutive days in June 1999 (N = 734).

RESULTS

Two-third said that they had access to a nuchal translucency measurement (NTM) and to maternal serum screening (MSS), and 16% to amniocentesis. Thirty-eight percent of the women who had NTMs and 69% of those who had serum screening said that they had been informed of the need for amniocentesis if the results were abnormal. Among the women who had amniocentesis, 20% did not know the risk of miscarriage and 41% had not been informed about the possibility of terminating the pregnancy if trisomy 21 was diagnosed.

CONCLUSIONS

Mothers' knowledge about the screening tests for trisomy 21 remains fragmentary. Providing comprehensive information about all these tests should be considered in early pregnancy so that women can make informed choices.

Women's knowledge of prenatal ultrasound and informed choice

This study evaluated women's understanding of prenatal ultrasound in terms of meeting the requirements for informed choice. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to evaluate (1) how information is provided, (2) women's perceived value of the information received and, (3) their understanding of ultrasound in relation to the principles of informed choice. Women (n=113) completed a questionnaire prior to their 18-week ultrasound. Fifty-five percent stated they received no information from their care provider. Only 31.9% considered health care providers as a "very helpful" source of information. Yet, 69.0% stated their care provider gave them information that facilitated their understanding. Gaps were identified in women's understanding of ultrasound. Specifically, 46.0% did not view ultrasound as a screen for anomalies; some were uncertain about their safety (18.6%), diagnostic capabilities (26.5%), and limitations of testing (37.2%). These results suggest that women's understanding of ultrasound does not meet the requirements of informed choice.

Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a survey of pregnant women's views

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to assess women's self-reported awareness of Down syndrome before they became pregnant and after they were supposedly informed about screening. We investigated their understanding of the purpose of screening and what a high statistical risk for Down syndrome means, and if there was a high statistical risk whether they would undergo amniocentesis.

METHODS

Pregnant women (n=274) ranging from 17 to 43 years of age, with different educational backgrounds, were surveyed by means of a questionnaire which was given to them immediately before blood samples were taken.

RESULTS

Women without a college education were significantly less likely then those with a college education to be aware of Down syndrome prior to pregnancy. Many of them reported being unaware of it even after they had been counseled and tested. Women with a lower level of education were also significantly less likely to have a clear understanding of purpose of screening. Fewer than 0.7% of women who were tested said they were not prepared to undergo amniocentesis, and 47.1% said they would consider amniocentesis only after receiving the screening test result.

CONCLUSION

Procedures for education women prior to maternal screening must be provided.

Triple Test Screening for Down Syndrome: Looking Back on a False-Positive Result and Having or Not Having a Triple Test in Subsequent Pregnancies

Objectives: It was the main aim of the present retrospective study carried out in Flanders to evaluate how women with a false-positive triple test result look back on their experience and decision making and how many of them make use of the triple test in subsequent pregnancies. Methods: All 508 women tested in the Centre for Human Genetics in Leuven in 1995 who had a positive triple test result followed by a normal amniocentesis outcome were invited to participate in a mailed questionnaire study with open and multiple choice questions in 1998. The response rate was 68%. Results: The answers to the multiple choice question assessing how they look back on their initial expectations regarding the exact meaning of the triple test revealed that less than one half reported that it concerned the identification of 'a higher risk of carrying a child with Down syndrome (DS)'. Reporting correct initial expectations was significantly associated with a higher education level. The same holds for indecisiveness regarding pregnancy termination should the amniocentesis have detected a fetus with DS. As expected, a large majority of the women reported a high level of distress or worry after the communication of the positive triple test result. Overall the findings show that retrospectively most women had the feeling that the decision to have amniocentesis was their own decision rather than a professional's. Of the subgroup with one or more subsequent pregnancies 70% had another triple test. Conclusions: The overall results of this study clearly reveal a need for a systematic approach aimed at better informing and counselling pregnant women about the implications and limitations of the triple test. Notwithstanding the reported high level of distress caused by a positive triple test result, a large majority of the women with subsequent pregnancies had another triple test; they represent a clearly higher percentage than in another recent study. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Favorable attitudes toward testing for chromosomal abnormalities via analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood

PURPOSE

The NICHD Fetal Cell Isolation Study (NIFTY) was a multicentered project to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities. The project included a psychosocial component, which is the basis of this article. We examined the attitudes of high-risk pregnant women toward the availability of a maternal blood test to identify fetal chromosomal abnormalities, how women would respond to hypothetical normal and abnormal maternal blood testing results, and the factors associated with a woman's preference to have an invasive procedure in response to a normal maternal blood test.

METHODS

High-risk pregnant women (N = 854) planning to have prenatal diagnostic invasive testing (amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) completed a survey.

RESULTS

The women highly favored maternal blood testing. Almost all women would seek invasive testing after an abnormal blood test. Only half of the women would seek invasive testing after a normal blood test; these women were older, more willing to terminate their pregnancy, and valued the increased accuracy of invasive testing more highly than women who would not have invasive testing after a normal maternal blood test.

CONCLUSIONS

Women having invasive diagnostic testing welcome a noninvasive procedure that uses fetal cells in maternal blood, and its availability would decrease invasive testing by approximately 50%. Research needs to examine the attitudes and anticipated responses of other risk groups as well as the effects of information about maternal blood test sensitivity and specificity on attitudes and responses.

How women deal with the results of serum screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy

To gain insight into how pregnant women experience serum screening for Down syndrome, we sent questionnaires to two groups of relevant subjects in the north of the Netherlands. The questionnaires addressed the following issues: decision-making process, knowledge and opinions. Questionnaire A was sent to women of 36 years of age and older (n=99) (group A) who were all 20 to 36 weeks pregnant at that time. In the Netherlands prenatal diagnosis is routinely available to these women. Questionnaire B was sent to women of younger than 36 years (n=69) (group B) who had received a screen-positive result and had subsequently undergone amniocentesis. About half of these women were still pregnant at that time. For these women, serum screening is only available on the basis of opting-in. The two questionnaires were largely identical. The response rates to questionnaires A and B were 82% and 91%, respectively. Group A (women of 36 years and older) considered that second trimester serum screening made a welcome contribution to the decision-making process about whether to undergo amniocentesis. Moreover, it reduced the amniocentesis rate considerably. The vast majority said they would apply for serum screening in a following pregnancy, but favoured the idea of first trimester screening. In group B (women of younger than 36 years), reassurance was the most commonly mentioned reason for undergoing serum screening. Almost all the women experienced some degree of anxiety when they were informed about the screen-positive result and 13% continued to be anxious, even after the favourable result of the amniocentesis. The majority of the respondents would also apply for serum screening in a following pregnancy and were of the opinion that this screening should be offered to all pregnant women in the Netherlands.

The Genetic Knowledge Index: developing a standard measure of genetic knowledge

This paper reports on the development of a unidimensional genetic knowledge index that has been tested and validated in a general population sample. The Index is intended to provide the basis for a standard measure of basic genetic knowledge that can be applied across diverse populations and research settings. The study group was composed of 330 European Americans selected randomly in the Louisville, KY, metropolitan area. The final version of the Genetic Knowledge Index (GKI) consisted of five items identified by principle components analysis, correlation coefficients, and the alpha measure of internal consistency. Construct validity of the GKI was determined by appropriate statistical correlations with educational attainment and attitudes toward genetic discrimination. The Index provides a numerical ranking of subjects' knowledge of practical genetics. Implications for research are discussed.

Participation in prenatal screening tests and intentions concerning selective termination in Finnish maternity care

AIMS

The study examined how prenatal screening tests are presented to women, factors associated with women's participation in screening, their experience of decision-making and intentions concerning pregnancy termination, and hospital data on rates of selective terminations.

METHODS

Questionnaires were given to pregnant women visiting maternity centres in two Finnish towns in which serum screening was offered (n = 1,035) and in one town where midtrimester ultrasound screening was offered (n = 497). Response rates to the questionnaires were 88 and 85%, respectively. Other questionnaires asking about selective terminations following detected fetal disorders were sent in 1993 to all public hospitals with obstetrics or gynaecology departments (response rate 100%).

RESULTS

The serum screening test had usually been offered to women as a free choice, but for 22% of them it was presented as a routine procedure. Most women (92%) underwent serum screening and most (86%) found the decision to participate or not easy. In almost every aspect of presentation and participation studied, serum and ultrasound screening differed from each other. 85% of respondents to ultrasound screening answered that it was offered as a routine procedure. Close acquaintance with a person with congenital disability was negatively associated with participation in serum screening and with the intention to terminate pregnancy in case of a detected disability. 27% of women in the serum screening survey and 22% in the ultrasound survey declared that they would have declined pregnancy termination if a fetal disorder had been detected. However, according to the hospitals' data, only 13% of pregnancies with a serious fetal disorder detected were continued.

CONCLUSIONS

All prenatal screening tests, including ultrasound examinations, require an adequate process of informed consent. Because the aim of such tests is to detect fetal malformations and syndromes, health care professionals should discuss the implications with women before they decide. Because acquaintance with a disabled person was found to associate with participation in screening and with intentions about selective termination, women's perceptions of lives of the disabled should receive more attention in future studies.

Informed consent to serum screening for Down syndrome: are women given adequate information?

To assess the information given to women during a maternal serum screening (MSS) programme, we prospectively applied a questionnaire to 504 pregnant women attending for amniocentesis after a screen-positive result. The survey based on 200 usable questionnaires (39.7 per cent of our study population) showed that MSS was imposed as mandatory by 41.5 per cent of providers and done without their patients' agreement by 16 per cent. After release of the test results, 6.5 per cent of women believed that they were carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus and 21.5 per cent thought the risk was about 50-50. A total of 38.5 per cent of the pregnant women were not informed of the risk of miscarriage after amniocentesis and 67.5 per cent believed that there was no possibility of a false-negative result with MSS. Information given over the telephone was particularly poorly understood compared with information provided during an outcome visit, since women who learned of their test result during such a visit scored significantly higher (69 per cent) when questioned about the risk of carrying a Down syndrome-affected fetus, compared with women informed of their test results by telephone (38.7 per cent) or by letter (47 per cent). We therefore suggest routine consultation with an antenatal care professional before testing to enable pregnant women to give their informed consent to MSS.

Development of a knowledge scale about breast cancer and heredity (BCHK)

An 11-item questionnaire, the Breast Cancer and Heredity Knowledge Scale (BCHK), was developed to test general knowledge about breast cancer and hereditary breast cancer (HBC) among women at low to moderate risk of HBC. The BCHK measures knowledge about breast cancer incidence and prognosis, risk factors, screening, disease presentation and treatment, and HBC. Scale items were generated from focus group interviews, previously published breast cancer knowledge scales, and consultation with a multidisciplinary research team, including health professionals and women with breast cancer or a family history of breast cancer. A 27-item draft scale was tested on 36 breast clinic patients and 17 women from the general public. Results were used to develop the final 11-item scale. Development of the scale and its potential uses are discussed.

Factors affecting women's knowledge of antenatal serum screening

Antenatal screening for fetal anomaly is offered routinely in Glasgow. This study assessed pregnant women's knowledge of the test and implications of results. Questionnaires were completed by 574 women. Knowledge of the nature and uses of the test was superior to earlier studies Two-thirds knew that screening was undertaken for Down's syndrome, and 81% for spina bifida. The majority were aware of the sample used, ages invited and gestation at which it was undertaken. Knowledge of the likely results and implications was poorer. Three-quarters were unaware that 10% of results would suggest an increased risk. Half did not realise that positive results could occur without fetal abnormality, or negative results could be falsely reassuring. Socioeconomic deprivation was associated with poorer knowledge but not lower uptake. Written information was associated with superior knowledge and higher uptake. Leaflets should be provided prior to booking, at which time resultant queries can be answered.