Quality evaluation of plateletpheresis using the new AMICUS (Baxter) cell separator: evolution of CD 62 expression

Comparative Analysis of Various Aspects of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC Cell Separator Instruments

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Fenwal Amicus and the Fresenius COM.TEC apheresis instruments regarding donor peripheral blood parameters, operational variables of the instruments, and quality control parameters of the product obtained.

METHODS

We performed 100 platelet collections from 100 voluntary donors using the 2 studied devices. We measured platelet count using an automated analyzer and analyzed the activation statuses using a flow cytometer.

RESULTS

The median time needed to perform the procedures was significantly longer with the COM.TEC. However, the product we obtained using the Amicus instrument showed higher degrees of platelet-activation. All products we obtained with both instruments had white blood cell counts of less than 5 × 10(6) per bag. We observed no statistical difference regarding collection efficiency and collection rates between the devices.

CONCLUSION

Both instruments collected platelets efficiently, with minimal donor discomfort. Compared with the COM.TEC instrument, the Amicus reached the platelet target yield more quickly; however, it displayed an increase in platelet activation.

Monitoring of platelet activation in platelet concentrates using transmission electron microscopy

OBJECTIVE

The quality of platelet concentrates (PC) is important for the in vivo recovery of thrombostasis in patients suffering from bleeding disorders and in tumor patients after chemotherapy. In this respect, activated platelets (PLT) cannot display their full functionality in the recipient and even can cause adverse effects. Therefore, we developed a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) method for quality assessment of PC.

METHODS

Score values taken from panorama TEM images describe the progress of PLT activation. To exemplify this method, i) 19 apheresis PC isolated with the Baxter Amicus system (BA) were compared with 14 PC obtained from pooled buffy coats (BC). ii) The score values of 33 PC derived from BA as well from BC were compared with flow-cytometric CD62P determinations by cross correlation. iii) Changes in the score value profiles during storage of a single pathogen-reduced BA PC were monitored over a period of 7 days.

RESULTS

The TEM evaluation described allows for demonstrating particular PLT activation stages. i) Significant differences between the percentages of the score values 0, 1 and 2 could be demonstrated in both processing groups. No significant differences were found comparing these two groups. ii) A weak correlation could be shown when comparing the percentages of score values 2 plus 3 with the percentage of CD62P-positive PLT. iii) The pathogen reduction affected slightly the score profiles during storage due to an increase of dead PLT.

CONCLUSION

Our investigations demonstrate the unique detailed quality information of PC obtained by the TEM method. This method can be performed in every routine electron microscopy laboratory.

Association between polymorphisms in the vesicular monoamine transporter 1 gene (VMAT1/SLC18A1) on chromosome 8p and schizophrenia

Linkage studies have suggested a susceptibility locus for schizophrenia (SZ) exists on chromosome 8p21-22. The vesicular monoamine transporter 1 gene (VMAT1), also known as SLC18A1, maps to this SZ susceptibility locus. Vesicular monoamine transporters are involved in the presynaptic vesicular packaging of monoamine neurotransmitters, which have been postulated to play a role in the etiology of SZ. Variations in the VMAT1 gene might affect transporter function and/or expression, and might be involved in the etiology of SZ. Genotypes of 62 patients with SZ and 188 control subjects were obtained for 4 missense single nucleotide polymorphisms (Thr4Pro, Thr98Ser, Thr136Ile, Val392Leu) and 2 noncoding single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs988713, rs2279709). All cases and controls were of European descent. The frequency of the minor allele of the Thr4Pro polymorphism was significantly increased in SZ patients when compared to controls (p = 0.0140; d.f. = 1; OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.11-2.57). Assuming a recessive mode of inheritance, the frequency of homozygote 4Pro carriers was significantly increased in the SZ patients when compared to controls (24 vs. 8%, respectively; p = 0.0006; d.f. = 1; OR = 3.74; 95% CI = 1.703-8.21). Haplotype analysis showed nominal significance for an individual risk haplotype (p = 0.013); however, after permutation correction, the global p value did not attain a statistically significant level (p = 0.07). Results suggest that variations in the VMAT1 gene may confer susceptibility to SZ in patients of European descent. Further studies are necessary to confirm this effect, and to elucidate the role of VMAT1 in central nervous system physiology and possible involvement in the genetic origins of SZ.

Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators

SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: A variety of apheresis devices are now available on the market for plateletapheresis. We compared two apheresis instruments (Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC) with regard to processing time, platelet (PLT) yield and efficiency, and white blood cell (WBC) content. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Donors undergoing plateletpheresis were randomly separated into two groups (either the Amicus or the COM.TEC cell separator). RESULTS: In the pre-apheresis setting, 32 plateletpheresis procedures performed with each instrument revealed no significant differences in donors' sex, age, weight, height and total blood volume between the two groups. However, the pre-apheresis PLT count was higher with the COM.TEC than with the Amicus (198 × 10(3)/μl vs. 223 × 10(3)/μl; p = 0.035). The blood volume processed to reach a target PLT yield of ≥3.3 × 10(11) was higher in the COM.TEC compared to the Amicus (3,481 vs. 2,850 ml; p < 0.001). The median separation time was also significantly longer in the COM.TEC than in the Amicus (61 vs. 44 min; p < 0.001). 91 and 88% of the PLT products collected with the Amicus and the COM.TEC, respectively, had a PLT count of >3.3 × 10(11) (p = 0.325). All products obtained with both instruments had WBC counts lower than 5 ↔ 10(6), as required. There was no statistical difference with regard to collection efficiency between the devices (55 ± 15 vs. 57 ± 15%; p = 0.477). However, the collection rate was significantly higher with the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC instrument (0.077 ± 0.012 × 10(11) vs. 0.057 ± 0.008 × 10(11) PLT/min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both instruments collected platelets efficiently. Additionally, consistent leukoreduction was obtained with both instruments; however, compared with the COM.TEC instrument, the Amicus reached the PLT target yield more quickly.

First comparison of productivity and citrate donor load between the Trima version 4 (dual-stage filler) and the Trima Accel (single-stage filler) in the same donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Aside from new software the blood cell separator TRIMA (GambroBCT) also received a newly designed separation chamber offering a novel single stage separation technology, called Trima Accel. We evaluated this new system focusing on productivity and donor comfort by comparing it to the previous version (Trima version 4) in collecting single-donor platelet concentrates (SD-PCs) and plasma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Each of 20 donors underwent platelet apheresis using both devices. We compared the collection efficiency (CE), the collections rate (CR), the volume of the collected plasma and the residual leukocytes. Furthermore we compared donor comfort in terms of duration of the donation, flow of citrate back to the donor and platelet and white blood cell (WBC) loss.

RESULTS

While the number of collected platelets and the platelet concentration did not differ significantly between both techniques the time of the procedure was reduced by 15.6% with Trima Accel. This results in an increase of the CR and CE of 25% and 15% respectively when using Trima Accel. Log normal probability plotting of WBC counts showed that both techniques complied with the European and the US leukoreduction guidelines. The mean flow of ACDA to the donor per minute and per litre blood volume was also reduced by 20%.

CONCLUSION

These data show that the Trima Accel represents a further improvement in apheresis platelet production with a better productivity and donor comfort, especially regarding the mean flow of ACDA to the donor.

Platelet activation during plasma-reduced multicomponent PLT collection: a comparison between COBE Trima and Spectra LRS turbo cell separators

BACKGROUND

The wide diffusion of multicomponent collection in donor apheresis has led to the yielding of different components, such as plasma-reduced platelet-pheresis at high PLT concentration. We investigated whether this collection modality could induce more PLT activation compared to standard plateletpheresis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty-one plateletpheresis collections (20 Trima and 21 Spectra LRS Turbo v.7.0, COBE) were evaluated. Donor, procedure, and product data were recorded. ADP, collagen, and U46619 (a thromboxane-A2 analog)-induced PLT aggregation was investigated in basal (donor) and final (plateletpheresis unit) samples. The expression of PLT activation marker P-selectin (CD62P) was studied using flow cytometry in basal and final samples. In all cases, P-selectin was investigated in final samples after stimulation with ADP to assess for a possible further release of the antigen. Four additional plateletpheresis procedures were performed in donors from Group A, using the traditional, nonplasma-reduced program.

RESULTS

Plateletpheresis obtained by means of the Trima device showed a lower response to in-vitro induced PLT aggregation and a higher percentage of P-selectin-expressing PLT when compared to products obtained using the Spectra device. Moreover, P-selectin release after ADP stimulation was reduced in plateletpheresis units obtained using the Trima device. These differences disappeared when a nonplasma-reduced collection program was used. In-vivo evaluation did not detect any difference between plateletpheresis obtained by means of the two cell separators.

CONCLUSIONS

Plateletpheresis units obtained by means of multicomponent collection show a higher degree of PLT activation compared to traditional plateletpheresis procedures when high-concentration plasma-reduced products are collected. Randomized clinical studies are needed to assess the real impact of these findings in terms of in-vivo efficacy of plasma-reduced plateletpheresis units.

Automated collection of blood components: their storage and transfusion

The performance of an automated device, the Gambro TRIMA, was evaluated for component production, and an in vivo assessment of the platelets was carried out. Red cell concentrates (RCCs), platelets and plasma were collected and stored according to standard blood bank procedures and evaluated for quality by in vitro measurements. Additionally, single-donor platelets (n=10) were transfused to thrombocytopenic patients after 5 days of storage. Platelet counts were measured after 1 h and the corrected count increment (CCI) was calculated. No significant changes were seen before or after procedure in donor haemoglobin, haematocrit, coagulation factors or platelet count. Return-line samples showed no increase in the level of plasma haemoglobin. Plasma haemoglobin and potassium increased following RBC storage, but there was no change in the red cell number. Platelet aggregation decreased from 52 to 11% (adenosine diphosphate) and the Kunicki morphology score dropped from 379 to 174. Little change was seen in the hypotonic shock response (69-63%) or in the percentage of CD62 expression (4.8-19.8) over time. The CCI averaged 28+/-26 x 10(3) microL(-1) in 10 patients 1 h after transfusion. The TRIMA machine collects RCCs, platelets and plasma in a variety of combinations in one session. For autologous collection, two units of RCC plus platelets can be collected at one time, reducing administrative and testing costs. The platelets have good in vivo recovery, as shown by the CCI values. An added advantage is that the TRIMA machine can be used in hospitals to generate components in times of shortage without the need for a component's laboratory.

Storage of single donor platelet concentrates: paired comparison of storage as single or double concentrates

Modern cell separators allow the collection of two plateletpheresis concentrates (PCs) at one session. This study evaluates the quality of PCs stored as double concentrates in standard storage containers of two manufacturers. We collected 20 PCs that contained 4.5 x 10(11) platelets in 375 ml plasma (10 using the COBE Spectra and 10 using the Fresenius AS.TEC 204 with 500 ml bags) that were split into one unit of 3.0 x 10(11) platelets in 250 ml (3.0-PC) and one of 1.5 x 10(11) platelets in 125 ml (1.5-PC). Storage of one 3.0-PC per bag of a two-bag system corresponded to storage conditions for double PCs and storage of one 1.5-PC per bag to storage conditions of single PCs. Cell counts, blood gas analysis, glucose and lactate levels, platelet aggregation, and activation and plasma levels of beta- thromboglobulin (beta-TG) and complement factor 3a (C3a) were measured before storage and again on days 3 and 5. COBE 3.0-PCs demonstrated less pH rise, lactate production, CD 62P expression and beta-TG plasma levels, and better aggregability after storage than COBE 1.5-PCs. Fresenius 1.5-PCs had similar platelet quality to COBE 3.0-PCs. Fresenius 3.0-PCs showed a fall of pH (day 5: 6.22 +/- 0.56), the highest amount of anaerobic glycolysis compared to all other storage conditions investigated, high CD 62P- expression and beta-TG plasma levels, and impaired aggregability on days 3 and 5. The highest C3a levels were found in COBE 1.5-PCs. 3.0 x 10(11) platelets in 250 ml plasma should be stored either in one bag of the COBE system or in two 500 ml bags of the Fresenius system. The COBE two-bag system allows the storage of two PCs without loss of platelet quality. Two PCs should not be stored in the Fresenius C4L 500 ml storage containers.

Phosphatidylserine exposure in platelet concentrates during the storage period: differences between the platelets collected with different cell separators

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Platelet alterations occur during the production and storage of platelet concentrates, the so called "storage lesion". We studied the platelet alterations during the storage period in apheresis concentrates, employing flow cytometry for phosphatidylserine (PS) detection on platelets during the five days of storage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-seven single donor platelet concentrates harvested with the Cobe Trima, Baxter Amicus, or Haemonetics MCS+ were analyzed for PS exposure by flow cytometry on the day of production (day 1) and on days 3 and 5 of storage. Furthermore PS expression was analyzed in platelet donors' blood samples withdrawn before plateletpheresis.

RESULTS

PS expression on platelets gave the following median values: in blood donors before apheresis it was 1.12% (0.13-1.78) in platelets concentrates on the first day (2 h after apheresis) 2.06% (0.66-15.2), the third day 6.57% (1.98-51.13) and the fifth day 23.04% (3.86-80.23). All differences between median values of PS expression in blood samples before apheresis, and platelets concentrates on days 1, 3 and 5 of storage, are statistically significant. The expression of PS in platelet concentrates was analyzed in relation to the blood cell separator used for the collection procedure and showed the following results: on day 1 the median values of PS in platelet concentrates collected with the three different blood cell separators, Trima, Cobe and MCS, did not show statistically significant differences. On day 3, the platelets concentrates collected with the Trima and with the MCS showed differences that were statistically significant. Those were respectively 10.59% (4.56-51.13) and 3.53% (1.98-12.61), p = 0.005. The PS expression in platelet concentrates collected with the Trima and MCS showed differences that are also statistically significant on day 5 at respectively 32.4% (9.61-80.23) and 8.57% (3.86-48.42), p = 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

PS exposure in platelet concentrates on days 3 and 5 rise to levels that could compromise the quality of the platelet units. Improvements in standardized platelet quality controls, and in platelet collection systems are required to reduce the storage lesions in platelets concentrates.

Apheresis-induced platelet activation:comparison of three types of cell separators

BACKGROUND

Platelet-harvesting technology differs in various cell separators. Alteration in shear stress and biocompatibility of surfaces may give variable platelet activation and thereby affect the quality of the component.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Four groups (n = 10) of single-needle apheresis procedures using three cell separators, were compared: 1) Spectra LRS, 90-minute harvesting time; 2) MCS+, 90-minute harvest; 3) Amicus, 90-minute; and 4) Amicus, 45-minute. Whole-blood samples were collected from the donors as were samples from the final components at intervals during the first 4 hours after cessation of the apheresis. Platelet activation status and platelet activation capacity after agonist stimulation were assessed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

No activated platelets were found in preapheresis and postapheresis samples from the donors. The platelets in the components from the Amicus (90-min) were significantly more activated than those in the other groups of components: that is, there was increased size of platelet aggregates, increased fraction of microparticles, increased degranulation, increased fibrinogen receptor activation, and decreased von Willebrand factor receptor expression. Moreover, the response of these platelets to agonist stimulation was reduced for all activation variables.

CONCLUSIONS

After 90 minutes' processing time, platelets obtained with the Amicus cell separator were significantly more activated than platelets harvested with the Spectra and the MCS+.

Prospective comparison of plateletapheresis using four apheresis systems on the same donors

To address the demand for higher plateletapheresis efficiency while maintaining consistent leukoreduction, manufacturers of apheresis systems have introduced new equipment or modifications to existing equipment. Using the same 20 donors, we compared the Fresenius AS104 (AS104), Fenwal Amicus, and COBE Spectra Version 7 Leukoreduction System (Turbo) to the COBE Spectra Version 5 Leukoreduction System (V5-LRS) and each other in regard to platelet (plt) collection efficiencies, processing times, and leukoreduction consistency. Using current pre-procedure platelet counts, target endpoints were set at 6-6.5 x 10(11) plt or 3.3-4.0 x 10(11) plt in up to 100 minutes processing time. Median platelet yields for V5-LRS, AS104, Amicus, and Turbo were 3.98, 3.63, 5.03, and 4.99 x 10(11) plt respectively; median collection efficiencies were 53, 46, 73, and 56% respectively; median collection rates were.049,.039,.065, and. 060 x 10(11) plt/minute respectively; double product frequencies were 35, 10, 40, and 30% respectively; and median processing times were 87, 92, 77, and 79 minutes, respectively. Amicus had a significantly higher collection efficiency and higher incidence of double products than all other systems. While AS104 had a significantly lower collection efficiency and lowest double product frequency than all other systems, Amicus and Turbo had significantly lower processing times than V5-LRS and AS104. AS104 leukoreduction was inconsistent, but V5-LRS, Amicus, and Turbo were consistently leukoreduced ((99.8% had <5 x 10(6) WBC at 95% confidence interval). The best overall performance was for the Amicus with Turbo a close second.