Cellular fibrous histiocytoma of the skin: evidence of a clonal process with different karyotype from dermatofibrosarcoma

[Atypical histiocytoma in a child]

BACKGROUND

Histiocytoma (HC) is a very common benign tumour generally seen in the lower limbs of adults, particularly women. There are, however, atypical forms of HC that behave like locally aggressive tumours, occasionally with relapse or even metastasis. Herein we report a case of locally aggressive HC in a child, which, on account of its clinical extension, required seven surgical procedures to achieve complete excision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 13-year-old child consulted for a hard purplish papule measuring 8 mm in diameter located in the right lumbar region. Punch biopsy revealed a poorly delineated dermal-hypodermic tumour comprising randomly distributed moderately pleomorphic fusiform cells, arranged in bands or with storiform architecture, certain of which were multi-nucleated. The mitotic index was high (11 mitoses in 10 fields at high magnification). There was no expression by the tumour of melanocytic markers (PS100, Melan-A), histiocytic markers (CD68) or CD34. FISH analysis showed the absence of COL1A1-PDGFB fusion gene. Based on these immunohistochemical and molecular findings, a diagnosis was made of atypical HC with high cellular density. Since the lower margins of the section showed tumoural foci, surgical excision was performed with 5-mm margins. Because the lateral and vertical limits were reached in all cases, a series of five further procedures (the last of was preceded by multiple peripheral biopsies) was necessary to achieve complete excision. These multiple excision procedures resulted in total excision of 25 cm across the longest side. No clinical relapse was seen after 25 months.

DISCUSSION

Cellular or atypical forms of HC carry a high likelihood of post-surgical relapse. They are characterised by marked pleomorphism and high cellular density. In our patient, the extent of the lesion had been greatly underestimated initially, resulting in the need for several surgical procedures in order to achieve complete excision. It is thus important to highlight the predictive factors for this type of tumour in order to enable sufficiently extensive excision, or excision guided by previous biopsies, to be contemplated from the outset. These predictive factors are: young patient age, unusual location (trunk, face, neck), high cellularity, marked mitotic activity and deep extension.

Expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 and MMP-11 in dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

Dermatofibroma (DF) and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) are the spindle cell mesenchymal neoplasms of the dermis and subcutis. Their histogenesis still remains uncertain and controversial. Traditionally, CD34 and factor XIIIa or other markers have been widely used to distinguish these two diseases. However, the results of these markers reveal overlapping and they lack specificity. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks were collected from the biopsied cases in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in Taiwan between 2004 and 2006. This study included 19 cases of DF and 17 cases of DFSP. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies CD34, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and MMP-11 was performed. We found that the expression of CD34, MMP-2 and MMP-11 shows significant statistical differences in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) study positive or negative reactivity (positive of CD34 in DFSP and positive of MMP-2 and MMP-11 in DF; p=0.03, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) between DF and DFSP. The result for expression of MMP-9 reveals no differences. The results indicate that the pathogenesis of DF and DFSP are affected by different expressions of extracellular matrix proteins. Metalloproteinases may play a direct role in these two diseases. Since no single marker can completely distinguish DF from DFSP, a combination of more than two or three stains may elevate the accuracy of diagnosis.

Overrepresentation of 17q22-qter and 22q13 in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans but not in dermatofibroma: a comparative genomic hybridization study

Histopathological differentiation between dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) and dermatofibroma (DF) is often difficult, because both neoplasms share some clinical features and the presence of a storiform pattern. In the present study, we investigated the usefulness of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in the diagnosis of these entities by examining 12 DFSP and 12 DF cases. The most frequent DNA sequence copy number changes detected in 10 (83%) of 12 DFSP cases (mean, 1.9 aberrations/tumor; range, 0-3) consisted of gains of 17q22-qter (10 tumors), 22q13 (nine tumors), and 8q24.1-qter (three tumors). High-level amplification, which was detected in three tumors, was seen only in chromosome 17, with 17q23-q25 as the minimal common region. Loss of DNA sequences was not found in DFSP cases. In contrast, two (17%) of the 12 DF cases (mean, 0.5 aberrations/tumor; range, 0-4) showed DNA sequence copy number changes, although recurrent gains and losses and high-level amplifications were not observed. Gains were more common than losses in DF. Overrepresentation of 17q and 22q sequences was a common finding in DFSP but not in DF. Thus, CGH seems to be useful for distinguishing DFSP from DF in most cases.

Cytogenetic evidence of clonality in cutaneous benign fibrous histiocytomas: a report of the CHAMP study group

AIMS

Cutaneous benign fibrohistiocytic tumours are among the most common soft tissue lesions. Their biological nature, in particular whether they are neoplastic or reactive, has long been disputed. Some morphological subtypes can be confused with sarcoma. Since available karyotypic data in these lesions are scarce, this study was undertaken to determine whether their cytogenetic analysis might demonstrate clonality and might help in differential diagnosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirteen karyotyped benign cutaneous fibrous histiocytomas (BFH) were morphologically reassessed and classified as ordinary BFH (eight cases), cellular BFH (four cases), and one ankle-type lesion. Five cases (38%) showed clonal cytogenetic changes, although the aberrations varied and did not correlate with histological subtypes. Karyotypic aberrations were more common in cellular BFH (3/4) than in the ordinary BFH (2/8).

CONCLUSIONS

The demonstration of clonal chromosome abnormalities, in at least some cases, supports the neoplastic nature of cutaneous BFH. The karyotypic changes identified are different from those in dermatofibrosarcoma, with which cellular BFH is often confused histologically.