Motor activity effects in female Fischer 344 rats exposed to isopropanol for 90 days

Riding (High) into the danger zone: a review of potential differences in chemical exposures in fighter pilots resulting from high altitude and G-forces

INTRODUCTION

When in flight, pilots of high performance aircraft experience conditions unique to their profession. Training flights, performed as often as several times a week, can expose these pilots to altitudes in excess of 15 km (~50,000 ft, with a cabin pressurized to an altitude of ~20,000 ft), and the maneuvers performed in flight can exacerbate the G-forces felt by the pilot. While the pilots specifically train to withstand these extreme conditions, the physiologic stress could very likely lead to differences in the disposition of chemicals in the body, and consequently, dangerously high exposures. Unfortunately, very little is known about how the conditions experienced by fighter pilots affects chemical disposition. Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to present information about the effects of high altitude, G-forces, and other conditions experienced by fighter pilots on chemical disposition. Using this information, the expected changes in chemical exposure will be discussed, using isopropyl alcohol as an example. Expert opinion: There is a severe lack of information concerning the effects of the fighter pilot environment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chemicals. Given the possibility of exposure prior to or during flight, it is important that these potential effects be investigated further.

Tolerable Levels of Nonclinical Vehicles and Formulations Used in Studies by Multiple Routes in Multiple Species With Notes on Methods to Improve Utility

Formulation of nonclinical evaluations is a challenge, with the fundamental need to achieve multiples of the clinical exposure complicated by differences in species and routes of administration-specific tolerances, depending on concentrations, volumes, dosing regimen, duration of each administration, and study duration. Current practice to approach these differences is based on individual experience and scattered literature with no comprehensive data source (the most notable exception being our 2006 publication on this same subject). Lack of formulation tolerance data results in excessive animal use, unplanned delays in the evaluation and development of drugs, and vehicle-dependent results. A consulting firm, a chemical company, and 4 contract research organizations conducted a rigorous data mining operation of vehicle data from studies dating from 1991 to 2015, enhancing the data from this author's 2006 publication (3 of the six 2015 contributors were also 2006 contributors). Additional data were found in the published literature. The results identified 108 single-component vehicles (and 305 combination formulations) used in more than 1,040 studies across multiple species (dog, primate, rat, mouse, rabbit, guinea pig, minipig, pig, chick embryo, and cat) by multiple routes for a wide range of study durations. The tabulated data include maximum tolerated use levels by species, route, duration of study, dose-limiting toxicity where reported, review of the available literature on each vehicle, guidance on syringe selection, volume and pH limits by route with basic guidance on nonclinical formulation development, and guidance on factors to be considered in nonclinical route selection.

Nonclinical vehicle use in studies by multiple routes in multiple species

The laboratory toxicologist is frequently faced with the challenge of selecting appropriate vehicles or developing utilitarian formulations for use in in vivo nonclinical safety assessment studies. Although there are many vehicles available that may meet physical and chemical requirements for chemical or pharmaceutical formulation, there are wide differences in species and route of administration specific to tolerances to these vehicles. In current practice, these differences are largely approached on a basis of individual experience as there is only scattered literature on individual vehicles and no comprehensive treatment or information source. This approach leads to excessive animal use and unplanned delays in testing and development. To address this need, a consulting firm and three contract research organizations conducted a rigorous data mining operation of control (vehicle) data from studies dating from 1991 to present. The results identified 65 single component vehicles used in 368 studies across multiple species (dog, primate, rat, mouse, rabbit, guinea pig, minipig, chick embryo, and cat) by multiple routes. Reported here are the results of this effort, including maximum tolerated use levels by species, route, and duration of study, with accompanying dose limiting toxicity. Also included are basic chemical information and a review of available literature on each vehicle, as well as guidance on volume limits and pH by route and some basic guidance on nonclinical formulation development.

Application of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for reference dose and reference concentration estimation for acetone

Recent health risk assessments to propose a Reference Dose (RfD) for acetone (Forsyth, 2001; U.S. EPA, 2001) have been based on the results of an oral subchronic study conducted in rats and mice (Dietz et al., 1991; NTP, 1991). These assessments have utilized the traditional concept of establishing the RfD by determining the lowest experimentally determined No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (NOAEL) and applying various Uncertainty Factors (UFs) (U.S. EPA, 1988). This article describes a risk assessment for acetone based on the systemic toxicity observed in subchronic and developmental toxicity studies to estimate an RfD and an inhalation reference concentration (RfC) for acetone. Specifically, this approach examined the subchronic study by Dietz et al. (1991), as well as an inhalation developmental toxicity study on acetone (Mast et al., 1988) and several toxicology studies of isopropanol (IPA). This was accomplished by applying a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model developed previously for IPA and its metabolite acetone (Clewell et al., 2001). The incorporation of the PBPK model into the derivation of an RfD and RfC for acetone allowed for a tissue-based approach rather than an external exposure-based approach, making it possible to derive an oral RfD from an inhalation study. In addition, the use of the PBPK model to analyze data from chronic and reproductive/developmental studies conducted with IPA enabled an assessment of the potential for acetone to produce any of the effects observed in the IPA studies. This analysis provided sufficient information to reduce the need for UFs in the adjustment of the NOAEL from the oral subchronic study for the determination of an RfD. Using the PBPK model in the acetone risk assessment supports a composite UF of 60 for the subchronic study, compared to composite factors of 300 to 3000 in the other recent risk assessments. This difference resulted in an RfD of 16 mg/kg/d, compared to the values of 0.3 to 3 that have previously been estimated (Forsyth, 2001; U.S. EPA, 2001). Considering the results from the inhalation developmental study (Mast et al., 1988) resulted in an RfD of 8.7 mg/kg/d. Using this study also fills a data gap for acetone that exists if only the oral database for acetone is considered for RfD derivation. An RfC of 29 ppm was also estimated for acetone using the Mast et al. (1988) study results in combination with the PBPK model. The potential impact of endogenous acetone on a risk assessment for acetone is also discussed.

Application of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for isopropanol in the derivation of a reference dose and reference concentration

An interspecies physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model describing isopropanol (IPA) and its major metabolite, acetone, was applied to perform route-to-route and cross-species dosimetry to derive reference dose (RfD) and reference concentration (RfC) values for IPA. Adult PBPK models for rats and humans were extended to simulate exposure to IPA during pregnancy and used to estimate internal dose metrics in the mother and fetus during development. Endpoints from chronic, developmental, and reproductive toxicity studies were considered for the derivation of RfDs and RfCs. Due to uncertainties in the mode of action of toxicity for IPA and acetone, the dose metric used for most responses was the total area under the blood concentration curve (AUC) for the combination of IPA and acetone. This combined dose metric provided a more conservative estimate than those based on AUCs for IPA or acetone. Peak blood concentration of IPA was the dose metric for neurobehavioral effects. The recommended RfD and RfC for IPA are 10 mg/kg/day and 40 ppm, respectively, based on decreased fetal body weights. All of the PBPK-derived RfD or RfC values for various endpoints were similar (within a factor of 3), regardless of route of exposure in the animal study.

Evaluation of potential neurotoxic effects of occupational exposure to (L)-lactates

Organo psycho syndrome (OPS) or chronic toxic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurotoxic condition reported following long-term exposure to paints containing organic solvent and to other solvents. Lactate esters are finding wider use as solvents. Lactate esters have been well studied in standard toxicity tests, but specific neurotoxicity studies have not been conducted. No clinical signs of chronic neurotoxicity have been observed in standard toxicity tests. Lactate esters are rapidly hydrolyzed in the body to lactic acid and the corresponding alcohol. Alcohols have been reported to have acute neurotoxic effects, usually following high levels of ingestion. The literature on alcohols was reviewed to establish the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for acute neurotoxicity and to look for any evidence of chronic neurotoxicity from the alcohols produced by hydrolysis of the lactate esters. The NOAELs were compared with the potential amounts of alcohol produced by hydrolysis of different lactate esters at 200 mg//m(3) (the NOAEL for most of the lactate esters). In all cases neither acute nor chronic neurotoxicity would be expected based on the amounts of alcohol produced by hydrolysis of the lactate esters at their NOAELs. L-Lactic acid is a normal metabolite in the body and is not considered neurotoxic. Based on this information there is no evidence to suggest that L-lactate esters can cause any chronic neurotoxicity, OPS, or CTE.