Standardization of terminology and assessment of functional characteristics of intestinal urinary reservoirs

Functional results after orthotopic bladder substitution: a prospective multicentre study comparing four types of neobladder

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate enterocystometry, voiding pattern and urine leakage of four types of orthotopic bladder substitute.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

At eight urological departments, 78 consecutive men were studied: 66 with an ileal neobladder [30 Studer pouches (S), 24 Hautmann pouches (H) and 12 T-pouches (T)] and 12 with a right colonic [Goldwasser type (G)] neobladder. Enterocystometry, determination of residual urine, micturition protocol and 24 h pad weight test were performed 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Colonic neobladders had higher pouch pressure at first desire, normal desire and strong desire than ileal neobladders (except at first and normal desire at 12 months) (p < 0.02) and contraction was present more often at both 6 and 12 months (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). Compliance was good in all types of pouch. Intermittent self-catheterization was more common in H patients at 6 months (p = 0.033). All patients with colonic neobladders used pads during the day and night. In patients with ileal pouches 32% used pads during the day and 70% during the night at 12 months. Urine leakage was higher in patients with colonic bladders at 6 and 12 months during the day (mean/median of 98/31 ml and 82/16 ml versus 10/0 ml and 4/0 ml, p < 0.001). T-pouches had excellent day-time continence, but nocturnal leakage was high.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hautmann pouch and the Studer pouch behaved similarly at enterocystometry and clinically, and continence was good in the majority of patients. The low number of patients with the other two types of pouch precludes definitive statements.

Urinary diversion and bladder substitution in patients with bladder cancer

For the majority of patients with invasive bladder carcinoma, radical cystectomy remains the gold standard of care. As a result the twentieth century has seen the continuous development of methods for reconstructing the urinary tract. Two decades ago the ileal conduit was by far the most commonly used method, whereas today methods geared toward patient continence are first choices in most centers. Some of these methods are unquestionably more complex than the ileal conduit, yet whether they actually yield uniformly improved quality of life is the cause of much debate. Many different variables play a role in determining the best type of reconstruction for an individual bladder cancer patient. This review analyzes the different factors that must be considered to obtain an optimal match between patient and reconstructive method.

Evaluation of flap valve as an alternative continence mechanism in the Florida pouch

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate urodynamic findings in a successful flap valve (FV) continence mechanism in association with a continent colonic urinary reservoir (Florida pouch) and to compare the urodynamic findings of the FV mechanism with the doubly plicated (PI) standard anti-incontinence segment in the same reservoir.

METHODS

Thirteen patients who successfully received the Florida pouch between 1988 and 1996 agreed to undergo urodynamic evaluation as part of a pilot study. Eight patients had a PI continence mechanism and a mean time from surgery of 51 months; 5 had a FV continence mechanism and a mean time from surgery of 14 months. Enterocystometry was performed with a trans-stomal Bard triple channel 7F catheter. Volume and pressure at first desire to empty (VFDE, PFDE), as well as maximal enterocystometric capacity and pressure (VMEC, PMEC), were recorded. Maximal outlet pressure (MOP) was recorded using the catheter withdrawal technique.

RESULTS

PI and FV groups demonstrated the following mean values respectively: VFDE, 692.7 and 403 mL; PFDE, 19.5 and 19.2 cm H2O; VMEC, 876.5 and 515 mL; PMEC, 25.9 and 24.6 cm H2O; MOP, 57.5 and 51.2 cm H2O (reservoir empty) and 50.5 and 52.6 cm H2O (reservoir full); and functional length of outlet, 24.3 and 24.6 cm. MOP measurement demonstrated greater variability in the PI than in the FV group.

CONCLUSIONS

Urodynamic comparison of these mechanisms reveals that MOP measurement was closer to the mean among FV than PI patients. In addition, the mean VFDE (692.7 mL for PI versus 403 mL for FV, P < 0.05) and the mean VMEC (876.5 mL for PI versus 515 mL for FV, P < 0.05) were significantly less in the FV group. Lower VMEC and less variability in MOP indicate that continence may be more dependent on MOP in the FV mechanism. A longer follow-up time and a larger number of patients will be of assistance in clarifying these findings.