Consolidative 32P after second-look laparotomy for ovarian carcinoma

Consolidation and maintenance treatments for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete response after first-line chemotherapy: A review of the literature

Most patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer experience objective responses to paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy, but responses are generally short-lived and the clinical outcome is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, the strategy to consolidate and to prolong the duration of response is very attractive. Different consolidation or maintenance treatments have been attempted, such as whole abdomen radiotherapy, intraperitoneal chromic phosphate, radioimmunotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic support, prolonged administration of the first-line regimen, second-line single-agent chemotherapy, and biological agents. Clinical studies have given conflicting, inconclusive, and generally disappointing results. A recent US randomised trial appeared to show that the prolonged administration of single-agent paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) significantly improved the progression-free survival of complete responders to paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy. Alternative less toxic, and probably more effective schedules of administration of chemotherapy (i.e. weekly paclitaxel) might assure a better balance between quality of life and anti-tumor activity in patients previously exposed to chemotherapy.

High-dose melphalan-based chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation after second look laparotomy in patients with chemosensitive advanced ovarian carcinoma: long-term results

The importance of dose intensity has been suggested in ovarian carcinoma. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term results of melphalan-based high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with hematopoietic rescue in a unicentric series of 33 patients with advanced ovarian cancer sensitive to first-line chemotherapy. Before HDC, treatment with debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy was followed by second-look operation (SLO). HDC consisted of melphalan (n = 8), melphalan and cyclophosphamide (n = 9), or melphalan, etoposide and carboplatinum (n = 16). Toxicity was mainly hematological. One death occurred from infection during aplasia. With a median follow-up of 60 months after intensification, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 29% and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 45%. Survival differed significantly according to tumor status at SLO. Women with microscopic or macroscopic disease at SLO, ie with a pathological partial response to first-line therapy (PPR), had survivals of 7% at 5 years, similar to other salvage therapies. Better results were obtained in the 20 women with a complete pathological response (PCR) at SLO with 43% 5-year PFS (median, 51 months) and 75% 5-year OS (median not reached). In conclusion, melphalan-based HDC with hematopoietic rescue had an acceptable toxicity in patients with chemosensitive advanced ovarian cancer. In situations of salvage therapy for patients in PPR, this treatment was not effective in long-term analysis. On the contrary, long-term results were favorable in patients with PCR, suggesting further prospective randomized studies comparing HDC and other consolidation treatments should be undertaken in this particular situation.